This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 |
Extract from User talk:Whydoesitfeelsogood#April 2021:
Hello, I'm
William Harris. Your recent edit(s) to the page
dog appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please
cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
At no stage did Perri 2021 state that the dog descended from the dire wolf.
William Harris
(talk) 06:42, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi, you just seems to be in love with dogs. How can that be encyclopedic, because it can't. The dog needs to be neutral. -- Whydoesitfeelsogood ( talk) 09:54, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
MR. COHERENT........
Did you actually read the f*cking source for my statement in my entry cited right after it? Or do you just manically revert sourced eduts 'for fun'? -- Philip Johann Nasia ( talk) 11:46, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
.......FOLLOWED BY MR. DIPLOMACY (WHO IS NOW BLOCKED INDEFINITELY)
AND I WONDER WHY I REMAIN A WIKIPEDIA EDITOR........
William Harris
(talk) 06:29, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, WH, how are you? I see that you're removing a good number of country Wikiproject banners from article talk-pages. Are you sure that there's consensus for that? You're citing Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide#Tagging pages with WikiProject banners in your edit summaries, but what I read there is "In general, one should not attempt to police which projects are sufficiently relevant to place their banners on a given talk page" which suggests that these edits might not be such a great idea. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 09:55, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi William. I have been reading a book rescued from a library sale, Australia's Mammal Extinctions by Chris Johnson, there are interesting but contentious ideas proposed as causes and solutions. Are you familiar with this work? ~ cygnis insignis 08:58, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
It is a bit daggy to do this, but I wanted to show you an image from Gould's Mammals of Australia; you probably have looked before but here it is again. The image may change if I get better at working on colour restorations from old texts (it is currently over-cooked). Like the thylacine, that other above (I started this with) suggested the dingo replaced, there are two lithographs showing a close up and in situ like above. Weather perfect, dog is happy, that is about it. Regards, ~ cygnis insignis 09:57, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Do you think maybe you could FORK the Hunting section in the article? Summarize it for the wolf article and move the rest of it to a new one? I feel like the article could use some trimming. Its 11063 words and it better for single species to be under 10000. LittleJerry ( talk) 02:12, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi! I spotted your revert (
1) on mentioned article. This information, however is partially correct, at least the first part of the sentence. Valvasor described breed as strong fearless and powerful dogs, which are breeded in river Pivka valley. Of course, I will add ref. to 1978 shrunken version of Slava Vojvodine Kranjske. With regards,
A09090091 (
talk) 10:51, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi William, as an outsider to WikiProject Dogs who has a few articles about dog breeds on my watchlist to combat vandalism, I initially found your edit to Dunker very confusing ... I wondered why you were adding links to a portal in an until-now non-standard format. I then noticed the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dogs#Portal:Dogs and it made a bit more sense ... while your edits aren't harmful per se I honestly wonder how helpful they are. I'd suggest that, if you continue making these edits, you provide a more informative edit summary, probably with a link to the WikiProject Dogs discussion. I'm generally meh about the existence of portals and relatively negative about see also links, but I don't want to get into a huge fight about them, so I don't feel strongly enough to revert your edits. I also wonder about the wisdom of making potentially controversial edits (which adding portal links can be) while you have a semmi-retired banner on your user page. I'm going to link to this discussion from the WikiProject Dogs talk page. Graham 87 07:25, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
In summary:
Is there anything else you would like to raise? William Harris (talk) 22:28, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Four years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:55, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I hope I’m not bothering you or anything. I just came to ask a favor of you, though I do not know if you are still even active anymore. I edited an article with a statement and I linked an article as evidence for said statement, however it was removed because an editor claimed that it was blank (which I do not understand what they are referring to). I wish to know what I should do in this situation, as I feel that my edit was valid, since it had a linked reference, but I do not want to re edit it back because it could be seen as vandalism and rebellion. What should I do in this situation? Firekong1 ( talk) 19:54, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
I see now. I assumed that since this one event happened, that it would apply to my statement as true evidence. I appreciate you letting me know what I did wrong. Though if I am to find any articles pertaining to my statement of European Martens being threatened by wildfires in Europe on a more general scale, then I will link it as a reference. Thank you very much, old friend. Firekong1 ( talk) 19:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
I understand. Thank you very much, my friend! I am glad to have this knowledge now. I hope to work and improve my skills as a contributor to wikipedia in order to improve this site. Thanks for your help! Firekong1 ( talk) 18:12, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello @ FunkMonk: and @ Mariomassone:, I will never look at an affable yellow Lab in quite the same way again: Origin of the domestic dog#Yellow dog William Harris (talk) 11:18, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
This new study came out August 27 2021 : Morphometric variation in wolves and golden jackal in India (Mammalia, Carnivora) https://bdj.pensoft.net/article/67677/
See the supplementary table 2 for weights. Have a great day and enjoy reading ! Gimly24 ( talk) 23:16, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
User:William Harris, You need to stop adding dubious and poorly-sourced information to the Harris surname page. Firstly, the page relates to the family name. Second, there are several origins of the family name, which I dealt with in the etymology section. Thirdly, the name is not exclusively Scottish (nor is it even common among Scots) so please do not edit the infobox to suggest such a thing.
Several of the sources you cite refer to Harris as a place-name (see Isle of Harris), not as a family name, therefore they are strictly unwelcome here.
The allusion to Ancestry.com refers only to user contributions, and not to items added by Ancestry themselves sourced from books on family names.
Your edits will be reversed. JoeyofScotia ( talk) 13:19, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
When a species officially becomes extinct on earth, what is required for one in changing the article of the related species? Firekong1 ( talk) 03:52, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Thank you Will, my interest actually simply extends to all fauna, especially those that are extinct and close to extinction, and megafauna, especially mammals, happen to be the easiest fauna to use to study this phenomenon. Firekong1 ( talk) 15:15, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
I have just completed a hasty rewrite of field trial ( before) and am astounded that it was rated B class. What are your thoughts now, B or C class? Kind regards, Cavalryman ( talk) 11:38, 27 October 2021 (UTC).
Hey will. I'm having a bit of confusion with the article passer predomesticus with the user innotata. This user has stated that my simple additions of the birds appearance are not helpful edits because they aren't sourced, but I pointed out to them that a few articles here pertaining to animals here use companions, and they aren't sourced.
See here: /info/en/?search=User_talk:Innotata#Hey_again
Here are my revisions:
Am I making a mistake (and in this case, am I in a bit of trouble), or is this just something insignificant?
Firekong1 ( talk) 02:59, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
I believe I was not specific enough before. What I'm saying is that I'm confused as to why I need to add sources for an animal's appearance when it sometimes seems obvious. But I felt that the user was hypocritical since there are several articles on animals using the same comparisons, yet they have no sources (they don't seem to need them), but said user said that they are false information (or similar drivel). Could you please restate what you stated in layman's terms? I did not understand it. By the way, I did not mean that I always want to be "right", but rather, whether or not I'm making a pointless mistake. If you'd like, you can discuss this with the user I mentioned, but be sure to understand my side of this as well. Firekong1 ( talk) 19:44, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Alright. Thanks. So did you resolve this issue with the other user I mentioned? Firekong1 ( talk) 11:47, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Alright then. I still believe that my situation is somewhat nonsensical, and that the user may be overreacting. Firekong1 ( talk) 02:40, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
I have started a draft of the level 5 vital articles rewrite draft, User:Cavalryman/sandbox/sandbox 1. I think there is a great amount of room to expand species at the expense of many of the breed articles and almost all of the individual dogs articles ( Laika is the only one I would include).
There are currently 16 spots to fill, but I would be happy to sacrifice some more breeds if more spots are required. What are your thoughts? Feel free to make some additions. I will present it at WT:DOGS when we have a solution. Cavalryman ( talk) 10:21, 7 December 2021 (UTC).
Hello Cavalryman, my choices for inclusion in priority order are the following:
William Harris (talk) 09:59, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
I was told not to add the term until there were articles using the name commonly, though I found at least one using it, but it didn't count anyway. I also asked if it was appropriate if I as a Wikipedia published papers as a biologist and that would count, but the users seemed to misunderstand what I stated. What should I do? The conversation is here: /info/en/?search=Talk:Panthera_pardus_tulliana#Iranian_Leopard Firekong1 ( talk) 00:29, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Alright. Makes sense. But in the future, when the name "Iranian Leopard" is used more exclusively, then would it count for addition? Firekong1 ( talk) 14:11, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Alright. Then I'll write quite a few research papers regarding the animal and using the name one day! Firekong1 ( talk) 03:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, William Harris! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 07:55, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Merry Christmas William Harris | |
Hi William Harris, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas Share similar holiday wishes by adding {{
subst:User:Davey2010/MerryChristmas}} to your friends' talk pages.
|
Hello. Help improvements for GA. Thanks you. Udem9 ( talk) 01:55, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Was Australia (continent) the last straw?
May I suggest a better 3RR - rest, relax, and return ...
If I get time, sometime in 2022, I am of a mind to rewrite the whole thing, after the cratons drift away ...
May I wish you a happier new year. Aoziwe ( talk) 09:46, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. |
Five years! |
---|
I love your memory of Corinne! Now we miss you too, best wishes for what you do! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 05:35, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, William Harris! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 21:03, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:03, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello William Harris,
Sorry to be an inconvenience to you but I saw a user:LittleJerry had edited the page Hunting behavior of gray wolves and specifically added the refrences Mech & Boitani 2003, pp. 119–121 and Heptner & Naumov 1998, pp. 241–242 and I had asked if they could help me by providing me some more detail on how wolves get lone bison to move.
However when they contacted me back they told me they had copied the refrences from you with the article being wolf. So instead I ask you, can you help me?
Thanks,
Breacan TheBreacanAthair (talk) 16:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC) TheBreacanAthair ( talk) 18:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 |
Extract from User talk:Whydoesitfeelsogood#April 2021:
Hello, I'm
William Harris. Your recent edit(s) to the page
dog appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please
cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
At no stage did Perri 2021 state that the dog descended from the dire wolf.
William Harris
(talk) 06:42, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi, you just seems to be in love with dogs. How can that be encyclopedic, because it can't. The dog needs to be neutral. -- Whydoesitfeelsogood ( talk) 09:54, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
MR. COHERENT........
Did you actually read the f*cking source for my statement in my entry cited right after it? Or do you just manically revert sourced eduts 'for fun'? -- Philip Johann Nasia ( talk) 11:46, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
.......FOLLOWED BY MR. DIPLOMACY (WHO IS NOW BLOCKED INDEFINITELY)
AND I WONDER WHY I REMAIN A WIKIPEDIA EDITOR........
William Harris
(talk) 06:29, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, WH, how are you? I see that you're removing a good number of country Wikiproject banners from article talk-pages. Are you sure that there's consensus for that? You're citing Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide#Tagging pages with WikiProject banners in your edit summaries, but what I read there is "In general, one should not attempt to police which projects are sufficiently relevant to place their banners on a given talk page" which suggests that these edits might not be such a great idea. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 09:55, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi William. I have been reading a book rescued from a library sale, Australia's Mammal Extinctions by Chris Johnson, there are interesting but contentious ideas proposed as causes and solutions. Are you familiar with this work? ~ cygnis insignis 08:58, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
It is a bit daggy to do this, but I wanted to show you an image from Gould's Mammals of Australia; you probably have looked before but here it is again. The image may change if I get better at working on colour restorations from old texts (it is currently over-cooked). Like the thylacine, that other above (I started this with) suggested the dingo replaced, there are two lithographs showing a close up and in situ like above. Weather perfect, dog is happy, that is about it. Regards, ~ cygnis insignis 09:57, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Do you think maybe you could FORK the Hunting section in the article? Summarize it for the wolf article and move the rest of it to a new one? I feel like the article could use some trimming. Its 11063 words and it better for single species to be under 10000. LittleJerry ( talk) 02:12, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi! I spotted your revert (
1) on mentioned article. This information, however is partially correct, at least the first part of the sentence. Valvasor described breed as strong fearless and powerful dogs, which are breeded in river Pivka valley. Of course, I will add ref. to 1978 shrunken version of Slava Vojvodine Kranjske. With regards,
A09090091 (
talk) 10:51, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi William, as an outsider to WikiProject Dogs who has a few articles about dog breeds on my watchlist to combat vandalism, I initially found your edit to Dunker very confusing ... I wondered why you were adding links to a portal in an until-now non-standard format. I then noticed the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dogs#Portal:Dogs and it made a bit more sense ... while your edits aren't harmful per se I honestly wonder how helpful they are. I'd suggest that, if you continue making these edits, you provide a more informative edit summary, probably with a link to the WikiProject Dogs discussion. I'm generally meh about the existence of portals and relatively negative about see also links, but I don't want to get into a huge fight about them, so I don't feel strongly enough to revert your edits. I also wonder about the wisdom of making potentially controversial edits (which adding portal links can be) while you have a semmi-retired banner on your user page. I'm going to link to this discussion from the WikiProject Dogs talk page. Graham 87 07:25, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
In summary:
Is there anything else you would like to raise? William Harris (talk) 22:28, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Four years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:55, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I hope I’m not bothering you or anything. I just came to ask a favor of you, though I do not know if you are still even active anymore. I edited an article with a statement and I linked an article as evidence for said statement, however it was removed because an editor claimed that it was blank (which I do not understand what they are referring to). I wish to know what I should do in this situation, as I feel that my edit was valid, since it had a linked reference, but I do not want to re edit it back because it could be seen as vandalism and rebellion. What should I do in this situation? Firekong1 ( talk) 19:54, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
I see now. I assumed that since this one event happened, that it would apply to my statement as true evidence. I appreciate you letting me know what I did wrong. Though if I am to find any articles pertaining to my statement of European Martens being threatened by wildfires in Europe on a more general scale, then I will link it as a reference. Thank you very much, old friend. Firekong1 ( talk) 19:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
I understand. Thank you very much, my friend! I am glad to have this knowledge now. I hope to work and improve my skills as a contributor to wikipedia in order to improve this site. Thanks for your help! Firekong1 ( talk) 18:12, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello @ FunkMonk: and @ Mariomassone:, I will never look at an affable yellow Lab in quite the same way again: Origin of the domestic dog#Yellow dog William Harris (talk) 11:18, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
This new study came out August 27 2021 : Morphometric variation in wolves and golden jackal in India (Mammalia, Carnivora) https://bdj.pensoft.net/article/67677/
See the supplementary table 2 for weights. Have a great day and enjoy reading ! Gimly24 ( talk) 23:16, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
User:William Harris, You need to stop adding dubious and poorly-sourced information to the Harris surname page. Firstly, the page relates to the family name. Second, there are several origins of the family name, which I dealt with in the etymology section. Thirdly, the name is not exclusively Scottish (nor is it even common among Scots) so please do not edit the infobox to suggest such a thing.
Several of the sources you cite refer to Harris as a place-name (see Isle of Harris), not as a family name, therefore they are strictly unwelcome here.
The allusion to Ancestry.com refers only to user contributions, and not to items added by Ancestry themselves sourced from books on family names.
Your edits will be reversed. JoeyofScotia ( talk) 13:19, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
When a species officially becomes extinct on earth, what is required for one in changing the article of the related species? Firekong1 ( talk) 03:52, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Thank you Will, my interest actually simply extends to all fauna, especially those that are extinct and close to extinction, and megafauna, especially mammals, happen to be the easiest fauna to use to study this phenomenon. Firekong1 ( talk) 15:15, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
I have just completed a hasty rewrite of field trial ( before) and am astounded that it was rated B class. What are your thoughts now, B or C class? Kind regards, Cavalryman ( talk) 11:38, 27 October 2021 (UTC).
Hey will. I'm having a bit of confusion with the article passer predomesticus with the user innotata. This user has stated that my simple additions of the birds appearance are not helpful edits because they aren't sourced, but I pointed out to them that a few articles here pertaining to animals here use companions, and they aren't sourced.
See here: /info/en/?search=User_talk:Innotata#Hey_again
Here are my revisions:
Am I making a mistake (and in this case, am I in a bit of trouble), or is this just something insignificant?
Firekong1 ( talk) 02:59, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
I believe I was not specific enough before. What I'm saying is that I'm confused as to why I need to add sources for an animal's appearance when it sometimes seems obvious. But I felt that the user was hypocritical since there are several articles on animals using the same comparisons, yet they have no sources (they don't seem to need them), but said user said that they are false information (or similar drivel). Could you please restate what you stated in layman's terms? I did not understand it. By the way, I did not mean that I always want to be "right", but rather, whether or not I'm making a pointless mistake. If you'd like, you can discuss this with the user I mentioned, but be sure to understand my side of this as well. Firekong1 ( talk) 19:44, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Alright. Thanks. So did you resolve this issue with the other user I mentioned? Firekong1 ( talk) 11:47, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Alright then. I still believe that my situation is somewhat nonsensical, and that the user may be overreacting. Firekong1 ( talk) 02:40, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
I have started a draft of the level 5 vital articles rewrite draft, User:Cavalryman/sandbox/sandbox 1. I think there is a great amount of room to expand species at the expense of many of the breed articles and almost all of the individual dogs articles ( Laika is the only one I would include).
There are currently 16 spots to fill, but I would be happy to sacrifice some more breeds if more spots are required. What are your thoughts? Feel free to make some additions. I will present it at WT:DOGS when we have a solution. Cavalryman ( talk) 10:21, 7 December 2021 (UTC).
Hello Cavalryman, my choices for inclusion in priority order are the following:
William Harris (talk) 09:59, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
I was told not to add the term until there were articles using the name commonly, though I found at least one using it, but it didn't count anyway. I also asked if it was appropriate if I as a Wikipedia published papers as a biologist and that would count, but the users seemed to misunderstand what I stated. What should I do? The conversation is here: /info/en/?search=Talk:Panthera_pardus_tulliana#Iranian_Leopard Firekong1 ( talk) 00:29, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Alright. Makes sense. But in the future, when the name "Iranian Leopard" is used more exclusively, then would it count for addition? Firekong1 ( talk) 14:11, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Alright. Then I'll write quite a few research papers regarding the animal and using the name one day! Firekong1 ( talk) 03:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, William Harris! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 07:55, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Merry Christmas William Harris | |
Hi William Harris, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas Share similar holiday wishes by adding {{
subst:User:Davey2010/MerryChristmas}} to your friends' talk pages.
|
Hello. Help improvements for GA. Thanks you. Udem9 ( talk) 01:55, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Was Australia (continent) the last straw?
May I suggest a better 3RR - rest, relax, and return ...
If I get time, sometime in 2022, I am of a mind to rewrite the whole thing, after the cratons drift away ...
May I wish you a happier new year. Aoziwe ( talk) 09:46, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. |
Five years! |
---|
I love your memory of Corinne! Now we miss you too, best wishes for what you do! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 05:35, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, William Harris! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 21:03, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:03, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello William Harris,
Sorry to be an inconvenience to you but I saw a user:LittleJerry had edited the page Hunting behavior of gray wolves and specifically added the refrences Mech & Boitani 2003, pp. 119–121 and Heptner & Naumov 1998, pp. 241–242 and I had asked if they could help me by providing me some more detail on how wolves get lone bison to move.
However when they contacted me back they told me they had copied the refrences from you with the article being wolf. So instead I ask you, can you help me?
Thanks,
Breacan TheBreacanAthair (talk) 16:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC) TheBreacanAthair ( talk) 18:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)