![]() | This is an archive of my talk page. Please don't edit this page; instead, please post new message on my main talk page. |
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:49, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2022).
|
![]()
|
user_global_editcount
is a new variable that can be used in
abuse filters to avoid affecting globally active users. (
T130439)Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:48, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Smallbones( smalltalk) 16:36, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
I had a bad reaction to what you wrote for The Signpost and inexplicably flew off the handle. I am quite ashamed to have been so totally wrong. I retract everything I said; the fault was mine. Chris Troutman ( talk) 19:11, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2022).
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:54, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
This was just relisted yesterday and I was preparing a rebuttal to the weak keeps. Can you please reopen it? PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Loofball. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. –– FormalDude talk 10:49, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
I was wondering if you would reconsider your Keep close at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devashish Nilosey (2nd nomination). Although Keep !votes are the numerical majority, consensus is not a head count and this type of local consensus does not override the community consensus which was established at a very well attended RfC earlier this year. I would encourage you to give appropriate weight (or lack thereof) to the !votes that cite criteria other than the current NSPORTS guideline or fail to address the lack of significant coverage, otherwise I'll be going to DRV. – dlthewave ☎ 12:41, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
provide reliable sources showing that the subject meets the general notability guidelineand
include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, which the keep voters failed to do. A local consensus of editors cannot override the wider consensus as reflected in the guidelines, and if you're not willing to stand by the latter then I ask that you revert your closure and leave it for someone who is more familiar with the rules. Avilich ( talk) 14:58, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).
Good morning, Waggers. I note your administrative action to close as DELETE the discussion over UP Halcyon, deleting the article. Your summary noted that the KEEP voters didn't attempt to rebut user HighKing's points, and you apparently weighed this into your decision.
Cordially, I think you were wrong here. Several of us corrected the basis for the original complaint about the page, which was a lack of citations. The detractors shifted their complaint to say that the nine new references we offered were either too close to the subject, or had some variety of notability concern. I and others had already rebutted those arguments in the earlier rushed deletion, and our comments were still germane: I thought that HighKing's bullying and persistent deletionist attacks were wordy but groundless, so speaking for myself, I didn't bother refuting him because I thought we clearly won the debate. We don't operate on a "last word wins" system here.
Several of the other DELETE voters were piling on, I think reflexively voting to delete without much thought about it.
I have no connection with UP Halcyon. I am a long-term volunteer, like yourself, and am moved to support this particular page because I am interested in articles about such college organizations. The Project to which I belong tracks and improves college fraternity articles. There are approximately 1,800 in this set, although we know of some 100,000 past and present groups that do NOT meet Wikipedia's notability rules and DO NOT merit articles. Hence, Project volunteers don't leap to support articles where a local chapter has less than ten years of activity. Where it is a national group, it must have chartered three chapters. We've expanded on WP's notability rules to clarify how these apply to fraternity and sorority articles in a standard methodology, here.
The UP Halcyon group meets that bar. It wasn't a puff piece, and the writing was solid. The group is notable at its university, and hence, to our view the argument that these references were too close to the group was dismissed by many of us. This, and similar campus groups often are "quiet performers" that only get broad media attention if they incur a crisis or get into trouble. I do not believe Wikipedia readers are well-served if we delete all such articles, only keeping those that concern groups which get into trouble, and are thus picked up as a national news story or written about in a book. That, in itself, would present a negatively biased, highly skewed perception of these sorts of groups. So we look for local media, and for mention by the various colleges on their websites.
Will you review your action here, and restore the page? Jax MN ( talk) 16:16, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:31, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).
{{
rangeblock|create=yes}}
or {{
uw-ublock|contains profanity}}
.Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).
/64
to the end of an IP in
Special:Contributions to see all of a subnet's edits, and
consider blocking the whole subnet rather than an IP that may change within a minute.Can you relist WP:Articles for deletion/1994–95 Santos Laguna season? I've been waiting for weeks for the October 19 DRV to close - but only just noticed that it had done so, and the AFD reopened. However, it wasn't relisted at WP:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Football until 4 days later on December 2 ( diff)! Given the controversy of this set of AFDs, and the differing results at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1994–95 Club América season and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1994–95 Club Universidad Nacional season where a longer and clearer discussion were held, then I think we need at least a full week to discuss. Nfitz ( talk) 17:10, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Neat little app. :) Thanks for including my map. Ittybittykittycommittee ( talk) 20:18, 14 January 2023 (UTC) |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).
![]() |
Hey, Waggers. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the
Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman ( talk) 23:30, 3 February 2023 (UTC) |
![]() |
I see that you were responsible for upholding the request to delete this page. Were you aware that I had composed a fairly detailed response to the proposition, but had placed this on the article talk page in error?
Also, I should point out that I had not, as the person who marked the page for deletion suggests, taken umbrage with them for quite the reasons suggested. I had tried from the start to communicate with this person but they refused to do so in any meaningful way, which unfortunately led to misunderstandings on both sides. What I was offended by, as I felt the comments were disrespectful and should have no place on Wikipedia, were some comments on their user page (which were not directed at me personally).
( Edwin of Northumbria ( talk) 00:49, 3 February 2023 (UTC))
Thanks for your reply and I will consider doing as you suggest.
It is disappointing to learn that effectively my argument was excluded from the discussion, and therefore the record of it also. Whilst I realise there was no requirement for you to check the talk page for comments prior to deleting the article, as a point of procedure it would be helpful (and, dare I say, polite) if clearly interested parties were informed that a discussion had taken place and invited to respond to the points raised. This would have at least alerted me to the fact I'd posted my comments in the wrong place. I also don't remember there being a link to that discussion on the article talk page, which would also have been useful. Particularly in cases where one editor has assigned a negative motive to the actions of another, in my view it should be obligatory to give that person the right of reply.
Sadly, I have to say that my experience over the past few weeks has raised considerable doubts in my mind over the mechanisms by which Wikipedia policies are enforced. Certainly, I would have never have allowed the charity of which I used to be chairman to operate in such a manner, and arguably one has to take even more in circumstances where matters are not being dealt with in person. Quite apart from anything else, certain aspects of UK employment law apply to voluntary organisations, and I could quite easily see a situation arising where Wikipedia's procedures were found wanting in this respect (I should stress that am not talking here about policies themselves, but the way in which they are applied).
( Edwin of Northumbria ( talk) 08:46, 5 February 2023 (UTC))
P.S. I intend no personal criticism here, as I can see that the procedures failed you just as much as anyone else!!
( Edwin of Northumbria ( talk) 09:08, 5 February 2023 (UTC))
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).
[p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.
For you addition at List of places of worship in the Borough of Eastleigh. I'd better schedule another visit to take a pic! Cheers, Hassocks 5489 (Floreat Hova!) 12:12, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SmallCat dispute. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SmallCat dispute/Evidence. Please add your evidence by August 4, 2023, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SmallCat dispute/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of my talk page. Please don't edit this page; instead, please post new message on my main talk page. |
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:49, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2022).
|
![]()
|
user_global_editcount
is a new variable that can be used in
abuse filters to avoid affecting globally active users. (
T130439)Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:48, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Smallbones( smalltalk) 16:36, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
I had a bad reaction to what you wrote for The Signpost and inexplicably flew off the handle. I am quite ashamed to have been so totally wrong. I retract everything I said; the fault was mine. Chris Troutman ( talk) 19:11, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2022).
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:54, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
This was just relisted yesterday and I was preparing a rebuttal to the weak keeps. Can you please reopen it? PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Loofball. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. –– FormalDude talk 10:49, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
I was wondering if you would reconsider your Keep close at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devashish Nilosey (2nd nomination). Although Keep !votes are the numerical majority, consensus is not a head count and this type of local consensus does not override the community consensus which was established at a very well attended RfC earlier this year. I would encourage you to give appropriate weight (or lack thereof) to the !votes that cite criteria other than the current NSPORTS guideline or fail to address the lack of significant coverage, otherwise I'll be going to DRV. – dlthewave ☎ 12:41, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
provide reliable sources showing that the subject meets the general notability guidelineand
include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, which the keep voters failed to do. A local consensus of editors cannot override the wider consensus as reflected in the guidelines, and if you're not willing to stand by the latter then I ask that you revert your closure and leave it for someone who is more familiar with the rules. Avilich ( talk) 14:58, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).
Good morning, Waggers. I note your administrative action to close as DELETE the discussion over UP Halcyon, deleting the article. Your summary noted that the KEEP voters didn't attempt to rebut user HighKing's points, and you apparently weighed this into your decision.
Cordially, I think you were wrong here. Several of us corrected the basis for the original complaint about the page, which was a lack of citations. The detractors shifted their complaint to say that the nine new references we offered were either too close to the subject, or had some variety of notability concern. I and others had already rebutted those arguments in the earlier rushed deletion, and our comments were still germane: I thought that HighKing's bullying and persistent deletionist attacks were wordy but groundless, so speaking for myself, I didn't bother refuting him because I thought we clearly won the debate. We don't operate on a "last word wins" system here.
Several of the other DELETE voters were piling on, I think reflexively voting to delete without much thought about it.
I have no connection with UP Halcyon. I am a long-term volunteer, like yourself, and am moved to support this particular page because I am interested in articles about such college organizations. The Project to which I belong tracks and improves college fraternity articles. There are approximately 1,800 in this set, although we know of some 100,000 past and present groups that do NOT meet Wikipedia's notability rules and DO NOT merit articles. Hence, Project volunteers don't leap to support articles where a local chapter has less than ten years of activity. Where it is a national group, it must have chartered three chapters. We've expanded on WP's notability rules to clarify how these apply to fraternity and sorority articles in a standard methodology, here.
The UP Halcyon group meets that bar. It wasn't a puff piece, and the writing was solid. The group is notable at its university, and hence, to our view the argument that these references were too close to the group was dismissed by many of us. This, and similar campus groups often are "quiet performers" that only get broad media attention if they incur a crisis or get into trouble. I do not believe Wikipedia readers are well-served if we delete all such articles, only keeping those that concern groups which get into trouble, and are thus picked up as a national news story or written about in a book. That, in itself, would present a negatively biased, highly skewed perception of these sorts of groups. So we look for local media, and for mention by the various colleges on their websites.
Will you review your action here, and restore the page? Jax MN ( talk) 16:16, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:31, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).
{{
rangeblock|create=yes}}
or {{
uw-ublock|contains profanity}}
.Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).
/64
to the end of an IP in
Special:Contributions to see all of a subnet's edits, and
consider blocking the whole subnet rather than an IP that may change within a minute.Can you relist WP:Articles for deletion/1994–95 Santos Laguna season? I've been waiting for weeks for the October 19 DRV to close - but only just noticed that it had done so, and the AFD reopened. However, it wasn't relisted at WP:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Football until 4 days later on December 2 ( diff)! Given the controversy of this set of AFDs, and the differing results at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1994–95 Club América season and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1994–95 Club Universidad Nacional season where a longer and clearer discussion were held, then I think we need at least a full week to discuss. Nfitz ( talk) 17:10, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Neat little app. :) Thanks for including my map. Ittybittykittycommittee ( talk) 20:18, 14 January 2023 (UTC) |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).
![]() |
Hey, Waggers. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the
Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman ( talk) 23:30, 3 February 2023 (UTC) |
![]() |
I see that you were responsible for upholding the request to delete this page. Were you aware that I had composed a fairly detailed response to the proposition, but had placed this on the article talk page in error?
Also, I should point out that I had not, as the person who marked the page for deletion suggests, taken umbrage with them for quite the reasons suggested. I had tried from the start to communicate with this person but they refused to do so in any meaningful way, which unfortunately led to misunderstandings on both sides. What I was offended by, as I felt the comments were disrespectful and should have no place on Wikipedia, were some comments on their user page (which were not directed at me personally).
( Edwin of Northumbria ( talk) 00:49, 3 February 2023 (UTC))
Thanks for your reply and I will consider doing as you suggest.
It is disappointing to learn that effectively my argument was excluded from the discussion, and therefore the record of it also. Whilst I realise there was no requirement for you to check the talk page for comments prior to deleting the article, as a point of procedure it would be helpful (and, dare I say, polite) if clearly interested parties were informed that a discussion had taken place and invited to respond to the points raised. This would have at least alerted me to the fact I'd posted my comments in the wrong place. I also don't remember there being a link to that discussion on the article talk page, which would also have been useful. Particularly in cases where one editor has assigned a negative motive to the actions of another, in my view it should be obligatory to give that person the right of reply.
Sadly, I have to say that my experience over the past few weeks has raised considerable doubts in my mind over the mechanisms by which Wikipedia policies are enforced. Certainly, I would have never have allowed the charity of which I used to be chairman to operate in such a manner, and arguably one has to take even more in circumstances where matters are not being dealt with in person. Quite apart from anything else, certain aspects of UK employment law apply to voluntary organisations, and I could quite easily see a situation arising where Wikipedia's procedures were found wanting in this respect (I should stress that am not talking here about policies themselves, but the way in which they are applied).
( Edwin of Northumbria ( talk) 08:46, 5 February 2023 (UTC))
P.S. I intend no personal criticism here, as I can see that the procedures failed you just as much as anyone else!!
( Edwin of Northumbria ( talk) 09:08, 5 February 2023 (UTC))
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).
[p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.
For you addition at List of places of worship in the Borough of Eastleigh. I'd better schedule another visit to take a pic! Cheers, Hassocks 5489 (Floreat Hova!) 12:12, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SmallCat dispute. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SmallCat dispute/Evidence. Please add your evidence by August 4, 2023, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SmallCat dispute/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)