![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | → | Archive 30 |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2018).
Interface administrator changes
Deprecated. Use ... instead
. An example is article_text
which is now page_title
.page_age
.The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Immigration and crime. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Israel. Legobot ( talk) 04:31, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
I addressed your second batch of concerns regarding the Tawana Brawley rape allegations article.--MagicatthemovieS
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (government and legislation). Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm inquiring about the reason for the Rapidfire band page deletion. It was explained to me that it was deleted because of page seemed only notable because of Axl Rose's participation. The band and its members, particularly the songwriter, guitarist and owner of the music has been featured in many news sites, and not just exclusive to music news: https://www.maxim.com/entertainment/what-its-play-and-be-sued-axl-rose, http://metalsludge.tv/rapid-fire-guitarist-kevin-lawrence/, http://loudwire.com/kevin-lawrence-rapidfire-dies-at-51/, http://ultimateclassicrock.com/kevin-lawrence-dies/, and many more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnmny ( talk • contribs) 16:18, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello there Vanamonde93.
Do you know anything about The Loud House a Nicktoon created by Chris Savino that has been airing since May 2, 2016? If so you might be a fan of that show or not.
The main premise of the aforementioned show is about an 11 year old boy named Lincoln who has 10 sisters making him the only male of the huge family.
Almost every episode had him breaking the fourth wall by talking to the viewer directly at the screen. But the pilot was just a test to have it green lit for a new series.
Fast forward to December 2 of the preceding year. You may be the one who protected the episode guide for the show indefinitely. Long term wouldn't get expired sometime soon.
Anyways have a response about this.
Good night,
67.81.163.178 ( talk) 01:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Vanamonde; hope that you are well. As you showed an interest in the Referendum Party article when I was pushing it through the FAC process this time last year, I wondered if you might be interested in taking a look at another article on a UK political party that I have at FAC: National Front (UK). So far, the FAC ( here) has not attracted much attention, and if you did have the time and/or inclination your comments would be appreciated. There is, of course, no pressure on you to do so if you're too busy or just not interested. Best, Midnightblueowl ( talk) 11:23, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Finally, I feel vindicated. It's well-known history that "Biko" always started with "Ngomhla sibuyayo" and ended with "Senzeni na" - in the album version, at least. Now, and this isn't gloating, it can be seen that Drewett researched it wrong. Though that means that my edits are now under yours, it at least vindicates and validates what I've been saying all along; history, aural and by Bowman's correct research, proved my original edits right.
FRANCO FERRER-SAN MIGUEL/HamadaFanFFSM( talk)
Hello, I see that an article I created has been deleted for the reason of not passing the general notability guidelines. I would like to request access to a version of this article that I can continue to edit, as I have new references to add. If possible, a review of the sources I have cited and their applicability to the notability guidelines will serve well to improve this article. These following references I would like to add now: https://calvinayre.com/2017/07/05/business/jonny-ferrari-cambodia-gaming-corrupt/ & https://calvinayre.com/2017/07/05/business/ca-rundown-july-5-video/ .If you look in the history of the deleted article, there are edits where some references I added were removed by other users. I am unsure why these references were deleted, and I would like to request clarification. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superstar P1 ( talk • contribs)
Current Swiggy wiki page is redirected to personal user account address which is incorrect redirect and need to be reverted back.
The reasons provided for page deletion are also outdated(dated 2016). Swiggy is already one of the unicorn startups of India and quite popular and thus they deserve a wiki page.
[1] — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Naman gt (
talk •
contribs)
17:46, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jeremy Corbyn. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello you have protected this article. My question : is it possible to quote the JVL making its "self-promotion", saying that "The Jewish Virtual Library relies on history books, scientific studies, various encyclopedias, archives, polls, maps, and material from museums" notes 5 and 6 ? It is a primary source and it is biased.
Is it possible to quote one single text from CNN or any other journal, and say the JVL is regularly cited by CNN, NYT etc ? I think it is an original research based on primary sources. יניב הורון didn't answer me ; he has been topic-banned today from the Arab-Israeli conflict.
Thank you for your answer.-- 2A01:CB00:980:7A00:A409:5D21:A34A:6D12 ( talk) 13:56, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
I'm not sure I can endorse your close of this. The discussion was open for 38 days, and for most of that time the tally varied from unanimous consensus to delete to 4-2 in favour of deletion, in which the two against were serial "keepist" editors who almost never !vote any other way, making bogus arguments which were immediately discredited and they refused to defend. The third "keep" !vote showed 37 days after the nomination and was similar to the previous two except that there was no time to respond to it.
This kind of close looks like you were waiting for another "keep" so you could close as no consensus without deleting. I'm sure that's not the case and it's just an unfortunate coincidence (and I'm being completely sincere in that; it's kinda difficult to avoid an air of sarcasm while complying with AGF in matters like this, but it's also difficult to word a description of the problematic timing of the close relative to final drive-by !vote without seeming to imply bad faith on your part, so this puts me in a really awkward position of having to say "believe me, I'm not blaming you"), and I'm not that bothered by it either way, but after what happened at another AFD some time back that I did have a lot invested in (where the AFD was 5-2 in favour of deletion, with one of the two clearly in bad faith, but it was kept open just long enough for it to shift to 6-4 because of a couple of drive-by commenters and then get closed as probably the worst "no consensus" result I've ever seen, and it never occurred to me to use deletion review) on principle I think it's a bad idea to let things like this go.
Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 22:00, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
I was looking at this one when you deleted. Please restore. The creator had had it restored as a WP:REFUND as recently as 6 March. The G13 tag was only placed today and the creator has not edited for a week so has probably not even had a chance to challenge it. There was also an MFD in 2016 on this that concluded it was notable and should be kept. Spinning Spark 17:14, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Dear Sir/Madam I see that you are an admin actively involved with granting permissions. I wish to have permissions removed from my account as I no longer have the time to be of consistent and continual benefit Wikipedia - those rights are - Rollbacker, Pending Changes and New Page Reviewer. Many thanks XyzSpaniel Talk Page 20:33, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stephen Miller (political advisor). Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Vanamonde93, I hope you are well. I recently noticed that you granted rollback to 6Packs, but I am concerned about the quality of reverts we're seeing and was a bit surprised to see rollback being granted to a user who began editing five days ago. While I don't doubt that their efforts are in good faith, I do not believe that they yet have the experience to use rollback, and a number of problematic reverts have caught my eye. From their five uses of rollback so far:
Based on these reverts, as well as some of their reverts prior to receiving rollback (e.g. this revert and subsequent warning), I thought I might bring this to you – any thoughts? Thanks. Thine Antique Pen ( talk) 23:36, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I think you deleted the deletion discussion page for BharatBala Productions by mistake instead of the actual article. Or something to that matter. So now that article has an AfD notice without the corresponding discussion page. Cheers, RetiredDuke ( talk) 23:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
I need to request you that please delete page User:F a v o n i a n. F a v o n i a n. as the deletion reason "Mass deletion of pages added by F a v o n i a n. F a v o n i a n." as it was created by the blocked (or banned user). Thank you. 122.162.93.195 ( talk) 05:54, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
That user page ( User:F a v o n i a n. F a v o n i a n.) is created by blocked or banned user so needs to be deleted as G5. So please delete User:F a v o n i a n. F a v o n i a n. as CSD G5. Thank you. 122.162.66.57 ( talk) 01:51, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Francisco Javier Arana you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MX --
MX (
talk)
03:41, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
The article
Francisco Javier Arana you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Francisco Javier Arana for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MX --
MX (
talk)
15:20, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for dealing with the troll @ my user talk page while I was AFK.
Can you reduce the protection to expire tomorrow 3am (UTC)? I guess 24 hours are enough for now. (Yes, technically I can do it myself, but that is against the policy...) — regards, Revi 14:04, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
The article
Francisco Javier Arana you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Francisco Javier Arana for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MX --
MX (
talk)
04:02, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Good Article Barnstar | |
Congrats for getting Francisco Javier Arana to GA status. I'm a big fan of your work. Hope to see more LatAm articles from you! MX ( ✉ • ✎) 04:05, 26 September 2018 (UTC) |
Hello Vanamonde93. Regarding the deletion of the article on holors, you mentioned that "[you] would be happy to refund the content to the userspace of anyone who wishes to perform a merger". I'm interested in doing that, because I think that this topic is very conceptually important (even if it is not very popular). Perhaps some mention of holors and holor theory should be made in the page on tensors. Or, if there is no satisfactory place for the content on Wikipedia, I could find a home for it elsewhere.
Zeroparallax ( talk) 19:54, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
@ Vanamonde93: Hello again! For your information, I've been adding references to the section on holors, with authors other than the originators (Moon and Spencer), with sources from 1977, 2000, and 2016. I can make arguments about why the concept of holors is notable, regardless of how many people have referenced it over time, but I have a feeling that most people would want to see some number of references before accepting the term. Do you have a simple rule of thumb for determining when notability has been unequivocally demonstrated?
Zeroparallax ( talk) 06:06, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
@ Vanamonde93: By the way, if you or anyone you know is interested in the tensor article, I'm working on a proposed lead re-write in the Talk:Tensor page. Also, I'm still interested to hear if you have a "rule of thumb" as I asked above. :)
Zeroparallax ( talk) 02:07, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
@ Zeroparallax: My apologies, I misunderstood that paragraph. You have a stronger case than I thought before, but given the previous consensus for deletion, I'd still suggest a talk page discussion first. Vanamonde ( talk) 04:01, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
@ Vanamonde93: Thanks, sounds good. I'll do that.
Zeroparallax ( talk) 05:45, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Politics of West Bengal the right place, wherein the detailed political scenario of Bengal, over the years (as researched upon by multiple scholars) can be delved into along with the policies, perspectives, manifestos et cetera of the ruling party and opposition camps, how did they appeal to the electorate, other incidents (mass-rigging et al) can be written about? ∯WBG converse 16:16, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Nabil Gabol. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Vanamonde, there was a ping to you from this DYK nomination page that went awry because the post wasn't signed. Please consider yourself pinged, if a couple of days after the fact. Thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 23:20, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jeremy Corbyn. Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Any chance of reinstating protection at Darbhanga? The amount of crap that keeps getting put back there is incredible. - Sitush ( talk) 07:40, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Dear Vanamonde93, The page”Syed Adam Banuri” was a biography page for the Syed adam Banuri, agreat Islamic Researcher, PHigh rank Sufi and a mystic as well as he is the progenitor of a sayyid tribe living in India and Pakistan. Please restore the page as the subject is important. Thanks--Syed Saqib Imad 18:21, 4 October 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Innocentbadshah ( talk • contribs)
Dear Respected @Vanamonde93, I am student you know better than me dear brother. I am requesting to you to help for the restoration of the page and do some basic settings of the format as per policies. I am sorry for doing wrong things and these are because i am a student, I will learn and will make sure to follow the policies in future articles. Please help. Thanks--Syed Saqib Imad 19:20, 4 October 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Innocentbadshah ( talk • contribs)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2018).
Interface administrator changes
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Presidents of Brazil. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
on getting the toolset:-) ∯WBG converse 14:29, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello Vanamonde93,
I understand your interest to make Wikipedia a better place, i found that Thinkwave is well known for Nytimes, BBC, Education Resources Information Center, TheFreeDictionary.com, Crunchbase and National Education Policy Center. Also google results shows About 76,000 results so i decided to create article. if you have any help it will be kind of you. Thanks Stev Knight ( talk) 17:39, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I see you contributed to debate on deleted article, Baye McNeil. Subject of article has been in news quite a bit - internationally - since article's deletion. I left a note on that at link below, and would be happy if you'd have a look. Thanks!
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Baye_McNeil
Ray Jameson ( talk) 05:11, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Trijnstel talk 10:18, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Communist Party of China. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I've been gaining some experience with using rollback since I was given the permission. Once my trial period runs out do I have to submit another request at
WP:PERM or do I talk to you (the person who gave me the flag)?
Thanks,
Kyle Bryant (
talk)
17:09, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello. The last recommendation on this article was to draftify it, rather than deleting it. Is this still possible, please? Rory1262 ( talk) 14:21, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:H-1B visa. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Vanamonde93, You might be an involved editor (not sure), but can some admin have a look at the train-wreck of a RfC on Talk:Regional power. Now there are editors who are digressing onto completely random tangents and that will only create a fertile ground for future edit-wars or bones-of-contention. If you prefer to stay away from the mess, I understand. Thanks. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 20:47, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | → | Archive 30 |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2018).
Interface administrator changes
Deprecated. Use ... instead
. An example is article_text
which is now page_title
.page_age
.The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Immigration and crime. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Israel. Legobot ( talk) 04:31, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
I addressed your second batch of concerns regarding the Tawana Brawley rape allegations article.--MagicatthemovieS
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (government and legislation). Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm inquiring about the reason for the Rapidfire band page deletion. It was explained to me that it was deleted because of page seemed only notable because of Axl Rose's participation. The band and its members, particularly the songwriter, guitarist and owner of the music has been featured in many news sites, and not just exclusive to music news: https://www.maxim.com/entertainment/what-its-play-and-be-sued-axl-rose, http://metalsludge.tv/rapid-fire-guitarist-kevin-lawrence/, http://loudwire.com/kevin-lawrence-rapidfire-dies-at-51/, http://ultimateclassicrock.com/kevin-lawrence-dies/, and many more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnmny ( talk • contribs) 16:18, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello there Vanamonde93.
Do you know anything about The Loud House a Nicktoon created by Chris Savino that has been airing since May 2, 2016? If so you might be a fan of that show or not.
The main premise of the aforementioned show is about an 11 year old boy named Lincoln who has 10 sisters making him the only male of the huge family.
Almost every episode had him breaking the fourth wall by talking to the viewer directly at the screen. But the pilot was just a test to have it green lit for a new series.
Fast forward to December 2 of the preceding year. You may be the one who protected the episode guide for the show indefinitely. Long term wouldn't get expired sometime soon.
Anyways have a response about this.
Good night,
67.81.163.178 ( talk) 01:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Vanamonde; hope that you are well. As you showed an interest in the Referendum Party article when I was pushing it through the FAC process this time last year, I wondered if you might be interested in taking a look at another article on a UK political party that I have at FAC: National Front (UK). So far, the FAC ( here) has not attracted much attention, and if you did have the time and/or inclination your comments would be appreciated. There is, of course, no pressure on you to do so if you're too busy or just not interested. Best, Midnightblueowl ( talk) 11:23, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Finally, I feel vindicated. It's well-known history that "Biko" always started with "Ngomhla sibuyayo" and ended with "Senzeni na" - in the album version, at least. Now, and this isn't gloating, it can be seen that Drewett researched it wrong. Though that means that my edits are now under yours, it at least vindicates and validates what I've been saying all along; history, aural and by Bowman's correct research, proved my original edits right.
FRANCO FERRER-SAN MIGUEL/HamadaFanFFSM( talk)
Hello, I see that an article I created has been deleted for the reason of not passing the general notability guidelines. I would like to request access to a version of this article that I can continue to edit, as I have new references to add. If possible, a review of the sources I have cited and their applicability to the notability guidelines will serve well to improve this article. These following references I would like to add now: https://calvinayre.com/2017/07/05/business/jonny-ferrari-cambodia-gaming-corrupt/ & https://calvinayre.com/2017/07/05/business/ca-rundown-july-5-video/ .If you look in the history of the deleted article, there are edits where some references I added were removed by other users. I am unsure why these references were deleted, and I would like to request clarification. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superstar P1 ( talk • contribs)
Current Swiggy wiki page is redirected to personal user account address which is incorrect redirect and need to be reverted back.
The reasons provided for page deletion are also outdated(dated 2016). Swiggy is already one of the unicorn startups of India and quite popular and thus they deserve a wiki page.
[1] — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Naman gt (
talk •
contribs)
17:46, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jeremy Corbyn. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello you have protected this article. My question : is it possible to quote the JVL making its "self-promotion", saying that "The Jewish Virtual Library relies on history books, scientific studies, various encyclopedias, archives, polls, maps, and material from museums" notes 5 and 6 ? It is a primary source and it is biased.
Is it possible to quote one single text from CNN or any other journal, and say the JVL is regularly cited by CNN, NYT etc ? I think it is an original research based on primary sources. יניב הורון didn't answer me ; he has been topic-banned today from the Arab-Israeli conflict.
Thank you for your answer.-- 2A01:CB00:980:7A00:A409:5D21:A34A:6D12 ( talk) 13:56, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
I'm not sure I can endorse your close of this. The discussion was open for 38 days, and for most of that time the tally varied from unanimous consensus to delete to 4-2 in favour of deletion, in which the two against were serial "keepist" editors who almost never !vote any other way, making bogus arguments which were immediately discredited and they refused to defend. The third "keep" !vote showed 37 days after the nomination and was similar to the previous two except that there was no time to respond to it.
This kind of close looks like you were waiting for another "keep" so you could close as no consensus without deleting. I'm sure that's not the case and it's just an unfortunate coincidence (and I'm being completely sincere in that; it's kinda difficult to avoid an air of sarcasm while complying with AGF in matters like this, but it's also difficult to word a description of the problematic timing of the close relative to final drive-by !vote without seeming to imply bad faith on your part, so this puts me in a really awkward position of having to say "believe me, I'm not blaming you"), and I'm not that bothered by it either way, but after what happened at another AFD some time back that I did have a lot invested in (where the AFD was 5-2 in favour of deletion, with one of the two clearly in bad faith, but it was kept open just long enough for it to shift to 6-4 because of a couple of drive-by commenters and then get closed as probably the worst "no consensus" result I've ever seen, and it never occurred to me to use deletion review) on principle I think it's a bad idea to let things like this go.
Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 22:00, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
I was looking at this one when you deleted. Please restore. The creator had had it restored as a WP:REFUND as recently as 6 March. The G13 tag was only placed today and the creator has not edited for a week so has probably not even had a chance to challenge it. There was also an MFD in 2016 on this that concluded it was notable and should be kept. Spinning Spark 17:14, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Dear Sir/Madam I see that you are an admin actively involved with granting permissions. I wish to have permissions removed from my account as I no longer have the time to be of consistent and continual benefit Wikipedia - those rights are - Rollbacker, Pending Changes and New Page Reviewer. Many thanks XyzSpaniel Talk Page 20:33, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stephen Miller (political advisor). Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Vanamonde93, I hope you are well. I recently noticed that you granted rollback to 6Packs, but I am concerned about the quality of reverts we're seeing and was a bit surprised to see rollback being granted to a user who began editing five days ago. While I don't doubt that their efforts are in good faith, I do not believe that they yet have the experience to use rollback, and a number of problematic reverts have caught my eye. From their five uses of rollback so far:
Based on these reverts, as well as some of their reverts prior to receiving rollback (e.g. this revert and subsequent warning), I thought I might bring this to you – any thoughts? Thanks. Thine Antique Pen ( talk) 23:36, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I think you deleted the deletion discussion page for BharatBala Productions by mistake instead of the actual article. Or something to that matter. So now that article has an AfD notice without the corresponding discussion page. Cheers, RetiredDuke ( talk) 23:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
I need to request you that please delete page User:F a v o n i a n. F a v o n i a n. as the deletion reason "Mass deletion of pages added by F a v o n i a n. F a v o n i a n." as it was created by the blocked (or banned user). Thank you. 122.162.93.195 ( talk) 05:54, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
That user page ( User:F a v o n i a n. F a v o n i a n.) is created by blocked or banned user so needs to be deleted as G5. So please delete User:F a v o n i a n. F a v o n i a n. as CSD G5. Thank you. 122.162.66.57 ( talk) 01:51, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Francisco Javier Arana you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MX --
MX (
talk)
03:41, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
The article
Francisco Javier Arana you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Francisco Javier Arana for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MX --
MX (
talk)
15:20, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for dealing with the troll @ my user talk page while I was AFK.
Can you reduce the protection to expire tomorrow 3am (UTC)? I guess 24 hours are enough for now. (Yes, technically I can do it myself, but that is against the policy...) — regards, Revi 14:04, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
The article
Francisco Javier Arana you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Francisco Javier Arana for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MX --
MX (
talk)
04:02, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Good Article Barnstar | |
Congrats for getting Francisco Javier Arana to GA status. I'm a big fan of your work. Hope to see more LatAm articles from you! MX ( ✉ • ✎) 04:05, 26 September 2018 (UTC) |
Hello Vanamonde93. Regarding the deletion of the article on holors, you mentioned that "[you] would be happy to refund the content to the userspace of anyone who wishes to perform a merger". I'm interested in doing that, because I think that this topic is very conceptually important (even if it is not very popular). Perhaps some mention of holors and holor theory should be made in the page on tensors. Or, if there is no satisfactory place for the content on Wikipedia, I could find a home for it elsewhere.
Zeroparallax ( talk) 19:54, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
@ Vanamonde93: Hello again! For your information, I've been adding references to the section on holors, with authors other than the originators (Moon and Spencer), with sources from 1977, 2000, and 2016. I can make arguments about why the concept of holors is notable, regardless of how many people have referenced it over time, but I have a feeling that most people would want to see some number of references before accepting the term. Do you have a simple rule of thumb for determining when notability has been unequivocally demonstrated?
Zeroparallax ( talk) 06:06, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
@ Vanamonde93: By the way, if you or anyone you know is interested in the tensor article, I'm working on a proposed lead re-write in the Talk:Tensor page. Also, I'm still interested to hear if you have a "rule of thumb" as I asked above. :)
Zeroparallax ( talk) 02:07, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
@ Zeroparallax: My apologies, I misunderstood that paragraph. You have a stronger case than I thought before, but given the previous consensus for deletion, I'd still suggest a talk page discussion first. Vanamonde ( talk) 04:01, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
@ Vanamonde93: Thanks, sounds good. I'll do that.
Zeroparallax ( talk) 05:45, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Politics of West Bengal the right place, wherein the detailed political scenario of Bengal, over the years (as researched upon by multiple scholars) can be delved into along with the policies, perspectives, manifestos et cetera of the ruling party and opposition camps, how did they appeal to the electorate, other incidents (mass-rigging et al) can be written about? ∯WBG converse 16:16, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Nabil Gabol. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Vanamonde, there was a ping to you from this DYK nomination page that went awry because the post wasn't signed. Please consider yourself pinged, if a couple of days after the fact. Thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 23:20, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jeremy Corbyn. Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Any chance of reinstating protection at Darbhanga? The amount of crap that keeps getting put back there is incredible. - Sitush ( talk) 07:40, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Dear Vanamonde93, The page”Syed Adam Banuri” was a biography page for the Syed adam Banuri, agreat Islamic Researcher, PHigh rank Sufi and a mystic as well as he is the progenitor of a sayyid tribe living in India and Pakistan. Please restore the page as the subject is important. Thanks--Syed Saqib Imad 18:21, 4 October 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Innocentbadshah ( talk • contribs)
Dear Respected @Vanamonde93, I am student you know better than me dear brother. I am requesting to you to help for the restoration of the page and do some basic settings of the format as per policies. I am sorry for doing wrong things and these are because i am a student, I will learn and will make sure to follow the policies in future articles. Please help. Thanks--Syed Saqib Imad 19:20, 4 October 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Innocentbadshah ( talk • contribs)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2018).
Interface administrator changes
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Presidents of Brazil. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
on getting the toolset:-) ∯WBG converse 14:29, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello Vanamonde93,
I understand your interest to make Wikipedia a better place, i found that Thinkwave is well known for Nytimes, BBC, Education Resources Information Center, TheFreeDictionary.com, Crunchbase and National Education Policy Center. Also google results shows About 76,000 results so i decided to create article. if you have any help it will be kind of you. Thanks Stev Knight ( talk) 17:39, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I see you contributed to debate on deleted article, Baye McNeil. Subject of article has been in news quite a bit - internationally - since article's deletion. I left a note on that at link below, and would be happy if you'd have a look. Thanks!
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Baye_McNeil
Ray Jameson ( talk) 05:11, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Trijnstel talk 10:18, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Communist Party of China. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I've been gaining some experience with using rollback since I was given the permission. Once my trial period runs out do I have to submit another request at
WP:PERM or do I talk to you (the person who gave me the flag)?
Thanks,
Kyle Bryant (
talk)
17:09, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello. The last recommendation on this article was to draftify it, rather than deleting it. Is this still possible, please? Rory1262 ( talk) 14:21, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:H-1B visa. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Vanamonde93, You might be an involved editor (not sure), but can some admin have a look at the train-wreck of a RfC on Talk:Regional power. Now there are editors who are digressing onto completely random tangents and that will only create a fertile ground for future edit-wars or bones-of-contention. If you prefer to stay away from the mess, I understand. Thanks. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 20:47, 12 October 2018 (UTC)