![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
In page sindhi language Native peakers There are about 50 million Sindhis in Sindh province of Pakistan and about 2.5 million in India. And you write 25 million edite it an curection Skr sahar ( talk) 03:29, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
This file is a modified version of another file on commons with the addition of the subdivisions of the Indian part of Kashmir. This current version is sourced to an external website, whose image licences are unclear, so it's probably not completely safe to be hosting their contet here (even though that is ultimately derived from something already hosted here: the additions are not trivial so can be subject to copyright). Also, the file isn't worth keeping as it's not usable anywhere on wikipedia: it's factually wrong in showing the Indian parts of Kashmir as though they were administered by Pakistan. I understand what you mean. However, Kashmir is an integral part of Pakistan and that is why I upload this picture on the web. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex Nottingham ( talk • contribs) 09:49, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the current target was around before the RfD closed, and one user even mentioned it. If the new target is a good one, the redirect really needs to go back to RfD instead of having multiple users decide to recreate it.---- Fabrictramp | talk to me 05:01, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
I hope you don't think I'm stalking your RM nominations! I didn't notice it happened to be yours, but I translated the French article about the book. I'd like to add the film The Ball of Count Orgel to the nomination proper, but I'm not sure how to do that. I've added a hatnote at the page.
Best wishes 94.21.204.175 ( talk) 10:18, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
look at the given source and correct the numbers Jishnusavith ( talk) 09:38, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
This morning you made feedback at redirects-for-creation where you advocate for maintaining red-links because it encourages article creation, but in reality it may do the opposite. Red links can only result in article-creation by editors who are autoconfirmed and such editors are declining by the day. OTOH blue links are more applicable for people who visit rdf-noticeboard since those users are only able to create articles from redirects. In a nutshell I think you have things backwards. I know you consider yourself an inclusionist, but since I was planning to create them, you've unintentionally put yourself into the deletionist camp. 92.2.79.3 ( talk) 11:03, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
I've created the following redirects:
As for the rest, an (admittedly very quick) web search seemed to reveal too few meaningful results, and the people don't appear to be mentioned in the source you provided in the AFC/R request. If you start these as drafts, I'd be happy to move them to the mainspace. Here's a list:
Thanks. – Uanfala (talk) 21:15, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I've noticed you've done a series of edits to WP:NPP/R. Given that you do not currently hold this PERM, I would suggest that venturing beyond style/clarity edits should be left to those with more NPP experience. For example your first edit struck me as helpful and a real improvement, while this edit changes longstanding NPP practice. This page serves as instructions to new and existing reviewers and generally changes to our procedures are discussed on the talk page before being changed. Hope that all makes sense. Best wishes, Barkeep49 ( talk) 03:37, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
A group of us are working through a list of templates with no transclusions, and Template:Cite hearsay came up on the list. It is unclear what it is used for. Is it OK with you if we nominate it for deletion? You are welcome to do so yourself, or to turn it into something useful. Thanks for any insight you can provide. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 20:44, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Template:Cite hearsay has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
22:14, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
I might as well have it deleted. Clearly I misinterpreted your response. I apologize. You were welcome to dispute the nomination or request a different outcome; it's a discussion, after all. It looks like you took care of it yourself, in any event. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 22:37, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi! I've been working from your page User:Uanfala/dab/missing entries 2018-11-26, and I was wondering if I should/may remove or strike through the ones I've taken care of. I just didn't want you, or anyone else, to waste time going through pages that have already been fixed. (I'll watch here, so no need to ping me.) -- ShelfSkewed Talk 18:32, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
have been here for quite long enough to know that lodging SPIs against IPs is of no benefit; due to our prohibitions against linking an IP to user. ∯WBG converse 10:06, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:Hinduism in Africa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 18:32, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Template:Hinduism in Africa has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing)
18:46, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Uanfala,
Wonderful article: hugely informative and well written.
I am not writing to critique except insofar as to point out newish developments pertaining to the tunnel experiment. Possibly they are beyond the scope of the already-written piece. Possibly also, they deserve their own Wikipedia entry.
Perhaps the most important advance on the subject is the upcoming book by Martin Beech, Going Underground -- which traces the history of the idea.
https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/11236
The hard copy publication is due out in May or June of this year. Excerpts are already available. It seems the e-book version may also be available (I haven't checked).
A point that appears to be neglected in your article and Beech's work is that the tunnel experiment need not be left without direct empirical support, i.e., as a mere THOUGHT experiment.
The standard oscillation prediction has sometimes been PRESUMED to be true, so as to form the mechanical strategy of "gravitational clock" experiments designed to measure Newton's constant G. As in the 2016 paper by M. Feldman, et al:
https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.02126
Earlier (1975) proposals to measure G with similar "tunnel-like" apparatus are found in a NASA paper by Larry Smalley:
https://archive.org/details/NASA_NTRS_Archive_19750014902
I have written to the authors of the Feldman, et al paper to urge performing a much simpler proof-of-concept experiment in a laboratory on Earth or in a near-Earth satellite. One of the co-authors, Virginia Trimble responded positively to my paper:
http://vixra.org/abs/1612.0341
I think it is important to realize that our LACK of empirical evidence to support the oscillation prediction also bears on Einstein's theory of gravity, General Relativity (GR). This is because the prediction is directly correlated with the GR prediction concerning the rates of clocks along the tunnel walls and at the center of the source mass. Specifically, the Schwarzschild Interior Solution to Einstein's equations has never been tested.
The last paper linked above provides details to understand this connection between Newton's and Einstein's theories. Most importantly, it emphasizes that certain key consequences of these theories are only PRESUMED to correspond to physical reality. In fact, they have not been tested. But THEY COULD BE TESTED, by turning the original thought experiment into a real experiment.
Cheers,
Richard Benish — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1C0:CC02:D7D0:802:FC8D:F9A9:F7C5 ( talk) 20:38, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Category:Redirects from Dharug-language terms, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Mr. Guye ( talk) ( contribs) 03:50, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
why you deleted my page https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=%DD%A2&redirect=no i provided sources but u deleted thats not fair — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rana Zubair Punjabi ( talk • contribs) 14:45, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
I moved the 5 extra Saraiki letters to Saraiki alphabet. (It's been a month since I read those source, and I don't really have time now.) I don't know where to put this dotted k or the retroflex l, so I mentioned them as possibilities there. It would be nice to at least know which varieties of Punjabi use them. Since retroflex l is ਲ਼ in Gurmukhi, I would think it might at least be used for loans. Maybe that's something Rana Zubair Punjabi could help with? — kwami ( talk) 21:52, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing my SD request at Lucy in the Sky (disambiguation). Submitted an AfD here. There was one thing in your summary that wasn't clear to me: What does PTMS stand for? Nardog ( talk) 22:37, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I think it will be necessary to start a more formal discussion on this one. Where would be the best place to do that? Chiswick Chap ( talk) 11:17, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Husnani Baloch is big tribe living in Tehsil kot Chutta of Dera Ghazi khan, Famous Persons Master Ghulam Sarwar Husnani, Sardar Afzal khan Husnani, Dr M Shahid Sarwar Husnani, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.255.5.83 ( talk) 04:55, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
On 13 May 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Maybrat language, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Maybrat language of West Papua traditionally uses a base-5 counting system? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maybrat language. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Maybrat language), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 00:02, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Hey brother, this caste is majorly concentrated in India and after it in Pakistan...thats why i put india first on native name...and this is our caste and our language...we know our caste complete name is Od Rajput...they are Rajput by birth for more information i tell you one thing...The Caste Rajput Are descendent of Ram...And Rama is descendant of King Sagara And Bhagirath..and we are also descendent of them...but we used od only because..i history the king have two son and samrat odra was descendant of one of them..and Rajput(who are not od) are descendant of another son...we both are rajput..but because of our Great samrat Odra(who settled odisha)..we use oad..so it we identify ourselve that we are rajput but descendant of Samrat Odra...and i mention link for you.. Odisha Ruler..you go on it...and In a section of 'ancient Period' go for title of 'Mention in mahabarata' and see the last point...this king(name not known) of Odra Kingdom that means he id Od Rajput who participate in mahabarata with Pandava..so...we are pure kshtariya.....so plz its my humble request to you from the bottom of heart..plz don't change it again...if you are also Od rajput...then you also our brother...we love you as our brother...and our love is not depend on religion or country...🙂 — Preceding unsigned comment added by OdRajput ( talk • contribs) 05:42, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
As per this [2] argument, shouldn't we remove the template of Pakistan too? ML 911 19:20, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for your comment on the PROD nomination. I've taken the article to AFD, with a longer explanation. You may be interested in participating. Wikiacc ( ¶) 15:30, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Template:Dangerous has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
You may be interested in participating since you commented on the previous TfD. Retro ([[User talk: Retro|talk]] | contribs) 12:14, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Looks like there was recently an update to Twinkle where if a redirect is tagged for RfD, Twinkle also tags the talk page of the redirect's target with a notification of the RfD. (I don't care if that edit gets restored either way, but I do see the usefulness in it ... especially if it is unclear of a redirect is truly eligible for {{ db-g6}} or not.) Steel1943 ( talk) 21:57, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi Uanfala, I am not sure why you say this. They are after all Indo-Aryan languages. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 22:45, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Since you know something about Thakur, would you fix the disambiguation at
Cheetah caste and
Sarmal Kshatriya Rajput Clan? Thank you.
Vmavanti (
talk)
19:21, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
"Like that"? ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:49, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
I am a Persian Wikipedia editor and have a question regarding the Northerners article (Korean political faction). I have translated this article but I have encountered a problem and ask you for help, meaning that the words Flesh Northerners, Bone The northerners used in this article are because the words Flesh and Bone have different meanings and what the meaning of this article is about Mohammad behrame cyruc ( talk) 07:07, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
"try the uncyclopedia website"
What's that supposed to mean? What are you, some sort of wise guy? VacationBibleSchool ( talk)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
In page sindhi language Native peakers There are about 50 million Sindhis in Sindh province of Pakistan and about 2.5 million in India. And you write 25 million edite it an curection Skr sahar ( talk) 03:29, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
This file is a modified version of another file on commons with the addition of the subdivisions of the Indian part of Kashmir. This current version is sourced to an external website, whose image licences are unclear, so it's probably not completely safe to be hosting their contet here (even though that is ultimately derived from something already hosted here: the additions are not trivial so can be subject to copyright). Also, the file isn't worth keeping as it's not usable anywhere on wikipedia: it's factually wrong in showing the Indian parts of Kashmir as though they were administered by Pakistan. I understand what you mean. However, Kashmir is an integral part of Pakistan and that is why I upload this picture on the web. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex Nottingham ( talk • contribs) 09:49, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the current target was around before the RfD closed, and one user even mentioned it. If the new target is a good one, the redirect really needs to go back to RfD instead of having multiple users decide to recreate it.---- Fabrictramp | talk to me 05:01, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
I hope you don't think I'm stalking your RM nominations! I didn't notice it happened to be yours, but I translated the French article about the book. I'd like to add the film The Ball of Count Orgel to the nomination proper, but I'm not sure how to do that. I've added a hatnote at the page.
Best wishes 94.21.204.175 ( talk) 10:18, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
look at the given source and correct the numbers Jishnusavith ( talk) 09:38, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
This morning you made feedback at redirects-for-creation where you advocate for maintaining red-links because it encourages article creation, but in reality it may do the opposite. Red links can only result in article-creation by editors who are autoconfirmed and such editors are declining by the day. OTOH blue links are more applicable for people who visit rdf-noticeboard since those users are only able to create articles from redirects. In a nutshell I think you have things backwards. I know you consider yourself an inclusionist, but since I was planning to create them, you've unintentionally put yourself into the deletionist camp. 92.2.79.3 ( talk) 11:03, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
I've created the following redirects:
As for the rest, an (admittedly very quick) web search seemed to reveal too few meaningful results, and the people don't appear to be mentioned in the source you provided in the AFC/R request. If you start these as drafts, I'd be happy to move them to the mainspace. Here's a list:
Thanks. – Uanfala (talk) 21:15, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I've noticed you've done a series of edits to WP:NPP/R. Given that you do not currently hold this PERM, I would suggest that venturing beyond style/clarity edits should be left to those with more NPP experience. For example your first edit struck me as helpful and a real improvement, while this edit changes longstanding NPP practice. This page serves as instructions to new and existing reviewers and generally changes to our procedures are discussed on the talk page before being changed. Hope that all makes sense. Best wishes, Barkeep49 ( talk) 03:37, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
A group of us are working through a list of templates with no transclusions, and Template:Cite hearsay came up on the list. It is unclear what it is used for. Is it OK with you if we nominate it for deletion? You are welcome to do so yourself, or to turn it into something useful. Thanks for any insight you can provide. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 20:44, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Template:Cite hearsay has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
22:14, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
I might as well have it deleted. Clearly I misinterpreted your response. I apologize. You were welcome to dispute the nomination or request a different outcome; it's a discussion, after all. It looks like you took care of it yourself, in any event. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 22:37, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi! I've been working from your page User:Uanfala/dab/missing entries 2018-11-26, and I was wondering if I should/may remove or strike through the ones I've taken care of. I just didn't want you, or anyone else, to waste time going through pages that have already been fixed. (I'll watch here, so no need to ping me.) -- ShelfSkewed Talk 18:32, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
have been here for quite long enough to know that lodging SPIs against IPs is of no benefit; due to our prohibitions against linking an IP to user. ∯WBG converse 10:06, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:Hinduism in Africa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 18:32, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Template:Hinduism in Africa has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing)
18:46, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Uanfala,
Wonderful article: hugely informative and well written.
I am not writing to critique except insofar as to point out newish developments pertaining to the tunnel experiment. Possibly they are beyond the scope of the already-written piece. Possibly also, they deserve their own Wikipedia entry.
Perhaps the most important advance on the subject is the upcoming book by Martin Beech, Going Underground -- which traces the history of the idea.
https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/11236
The hard copy publication is due out in May or June of this year. Excerpts are already available. It seems the e-book version may also be available (I haven't checked).
A point that appears to be neglected in your article and Beech's work is that the tunnel experiment need not be left without direct empirical support, i.e., as a mere THOUGHT experiment.
The standard oscillation prediction has sometimes been PRESUMED to be true, so as to form the mechanical strategy of "gravitational clock" experiments designed to measure Newton's constant G. As in the 2016 paper by M. Feldman, et al:
https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.02126
Earlier (1975) proposals to measure G with similar "tunnel-like" apparatus are found in a NASA paper by Larry Smalley:
https://archive.org/details/NASA_NTRS_Archive_19750014902
I have written to the authors of the Feldman, et al paper to urge performing a much simpler proof-of-concept experiment in a laboratory on Earth or in a near-Earth satellite. One of the co-authors, Virginia Trimble responded positively to my paper:
http://vixra.org/abs/1612.0341
I think it is important to realize that our LACK of empirical evidence to support the oscillation prediction also bears on Einstein's theory of gravity, General Relativity (GR). This is because the prediction is directly correlated with the GR prediction concerning the rates of clocks along the tunnel walls and at the center of the source mass. Specifically, the Schwarzschild Interior Solution to Einstein's equations has never been tested.
The last paper linked above provides details to understand this connection between Newton's and Einstein's theories. Most importantly, it emphasizes that certain key consequences of these theories are only PRESUMED to correspond to physical reality. In fact, they have not been tested. But THEY COULD BE TESTED, by turning the original thought experiment into a real experiment.
Cheers,
Richard Benish — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1C0:CC02:D7D0:802:FC8D:F9A9:F7C5 ( talk) 20:38, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Category:Redirects from Dharug-language terms, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Mr. Guye ( talk) ( contribs) 03:50, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
why you deleted my page https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=%DD%A2&redirect=no i provided sources but u deleted thats not fair — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rana Zubair Punjabi ( talk • contribs) 14:45, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
I moved the 5 extra Saraiki letters to Saraiki alphabet. (It's been a month since I read those source, and I don't really have time now.) I don't know where to put this dotted k or the retroflex l, so I mentioned them as possibilities there. It would be nice to at least know which varieties of Punjabi use them. Since retroflex l is ਲ਼ in Gurmukhi, I would think it might at least be used for loans. Maybe that's something Rana Zubair Punjabi could help with? — kwami ( talk) 21:52, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing my SD request at Lucy in the Sky (disambiguation). Submitted an AfD here. There was one thing in your summary that wasn't clear to me: What does PTMS stand for? Nardog ( talk) 22:37, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I think it will be necessary to start a more formal discussion on this one. Where would be the best place to do that? Chiswick Chap ( talk) 11:17, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Husnani Baloch is big tribe living in Tehsil kot Chutta of Dera Ghazi khan, Famous Persons Master Ghulam Sarwar Husnani, Sardar Afzal khan Husnani, Dr M Shahid Sarwar Husnani, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.255.5.83 ( talk) 04:55, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
On 13 May 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Maybrat language, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Maybrat language of West Papua traditionally uses a base-5 counting system? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maybrat language. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Maybrat language), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 00:02, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Hey brother, this caste is majorly concentrated in India and after it in Pakistan...thats why i put india first on native name...and this is our caste and our language...we know our caste complete name is Od Rajput...they are Rajput by birth for more information i tell you one thing...The Caste Rajput Are descendent of Ram...And Rama is descendant of King Sagara And Bhagirath..and we are also descendent of them...but we used od only because..i history the king have two son and samrat odra was descendant of one of them..and Rajput(who are not od) are descendant of another son...we both are rajput..but because of our Great samrat Odra(who settled odisha)..we use oad..so it we identify ourselve that we are rajput but descendant of Samrat Odra...and i mention link for you.. Odisha Ruler..you go on it...and In a section of 'ancient Period' go for title of 'Mention in mahabarata' and see the last point...this king(name not known) of Odra Kingdom that means he id Od Rajput who participate in mahabarata with Pandava..so...we are pure kshtariya.....so plz its my humble request to you from the bottom of heart..plz don't change it again...if you are also Od rajput...then you also our brother...we love you as our brother...and our love is not depend on religion or country...🙂 — Preceding unsigned comment added by OdRajput ( talk • contribs) 05:42, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
As per this [2] argument, shouldn't we remove the template of Pakistan too? ML 911 19:20, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for your comment on the PROD nomination. I've taken the article to AFD, with a longer explanation. You may be interested in participating. Wikiacc ( ¶) 15:30, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Template:Dangerous has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
You may be interested in participating since you commented on the previous TfD. Retro ([[User talk: Retro|talk]] | contribs) 12:14, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Looks like there was recently an update to Twinkle where if a redirect is tagged for RfD, Twinkle also tags the talk page of the redirect's target with a notification of the RfD. (I don't care if that edit gets restored either way, but I do see the usefulness in it ... especially if it is unclear of a redirect is truly eligible for {{ db-g6}} or not.) Steel1943 ( talk) 21:57, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi Uanfala, I am not sure why you say this. They are after all Indo-Aryan languages. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 22:45, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Since you know something about Thakur, would you fix the disambiguation at
Cheetah caste and
Sarmal Kshatriya Rajput Clan? Thank you.
Vmavanti (
talk)
19:21, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
"Like that"? ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:49, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
I am a Persian Wikipedia editor and have a question regarding the Northerners article (Korean political faction). I have translated this article but I have encountered a problem and ask you for help, meaning that the words Flesh Northerners, Bone The northerners used in this article are because the words Flesh and Bone have different meanings and what the meaning of this article is about Mohammad behrame cyruc ( talk) 07:07, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
"try the uncyclopedia website"
What's that supposed to mean? What are you, some sort of wise guy? VacationBibleSchool ( talk)