This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 35 | ← | Archive 40 | Archive 41 | Archive 42 | Archive 43 | Archive 44 | Archive 45 |
Could you please help dig up a couple more sources for this subject? Thanks. Also Draft:Jana Lund. Draft:Jean Sothern also seems slam dunk notable to me. But waiting on a review. What do you think about Draft:Effie Conley? And finally, I found the work of African Americam WPA writers in Florida very interesting. I started writing up Draft:Viola B. Muse but I don't know if she's independently notable? Maybe an article 9n the broader project? I don't know. Zora Neale Hurston gets a lot of coverage for her involvement but I don't know that herwork was more.important than that of others. Thanks for any in$ights or assistance you can provide. FloridaArmy ( talk) 00:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Fabulous!!! Thanks so much. The clip of Lund in the opening scene of Frankenstein 1970 was interesting. Is there any way to verify that the actress Jean Sothern is the same as the author of "Thumbs Up"? I only turned up copyright notices. Two Effie Conleys!!! Yes, it was strange that she was hanging about in Kentucky. Effie is a pretty unusual name these days I think. Thanks so much. FloridaArmy ( talk) 17:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Draft:Betty Brown (actress) is one I got tangled up on. Do you think one or more of them are worth a write up?
FloridaArmy (
talk)
18:01, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Fabulous!!! Thanks so much. The clip of Lund in the opening scene of Frankenstein 1970 on Youtube was interesting.
Is there any way to verify that the actress Jean Sothern is the same as the author of "Thumbs Up"? I only turned up copyright notices.
Two Effie Conleys!!! Yes, it was strange that she was hanging about in Kentucky. Effie is a pretty unusual name these days I think. Thanks so much. FloridaArmy ( talk) 17:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
On 6 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Patsy Mink, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after twelve medical schools rejected her applications, partly because of her gender, U.S. congresswoman Patsy Mink (pictured) became a lawyer instead? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Patsy Mink. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Patsy Mink), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass ( talk) 12:01, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Fantastic, well done!† Encyclopædius 16:28, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
In all honesty, I am not sure what are the specifics of adding 'owa' to some female surnames in Poland; it is an old custom and a form of conjugation (or rather, possessive I think - Zandbag's would be the literary translation, I think, also possibly related to Grammatical gender) I will ping User:Nihil novi - context of the question is at User_talk:Piotrus#Help?. If you'd like to read more about this particular issue, here are some sources - the first one has an abstract in English: [30], [31]. I will try to look for some sources for you when I can. Regarding photos, [32] is obviously published so it is ok, but I can't access the first one, link is broken for me. Regarding publication, this is crazy (and part of Wikipedia's copyright paranoia, nobody cares about those nuances of copyright outside our community; see my recent question at commons:Commons_talk:Publication#Does_the_copyright_lasts_indefinitely_if_an_image_was_not_published?, and for general reference, commons:User:Piotrus/PolishCopyright. Re the 1926 published photo, yes, PD-Polish should work. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:17, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
I am unsure if she is notable, but she is mentioned in passing here and there. Also known as Franciszka Tusk Scheinwechsler(owa). [36]/ [37]/ [38]. Interesting account is found at [39], note that the next page mentions... Maria Grzegorzewska. Anyway, I wonder if the coverage of Franciszka is significant to merit a stub? Her diary name in Polish is 'Cena jednego życia' ( [40]). But I have trouble confirming it was actually published/reviewed outside of the inclusion in the 1960 book. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:27, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Those your scripts (any version of them) will find problems with. The category is too large to fully compare with your contributions, but it will cover all your creation from A to Su (~89.7% of your creations). Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 17:23, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
{{harvid|'' Foobar''|1949}}
→ {{harvid|''Foobar''|1949}}
, so it was just a small thing to look for that pattern. I don't think your script would have picked up those.
Headbomb {
t ·
c ·
p ·
b}
20:24, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Yup, this is stuff you're better equipped to handle since you're familiar with the articles. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 20:41, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Might be interesting to expand for DYK? Not sure if the creator User:Volunteer Marek plans on doing so? The time window is half-gone. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:36, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Per my talk page
I'm not sure the scripts you have installed will detect those errors, however. Their detection is relatively new and still experimental. But that's the list. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 17:20, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
I took take of most of the low-hanging fruits. I'd focus on the list below if I were you, since that one has known errors. Whereas the 'errors' above aren't exactly critical and we're still trying to improve detection and figure out what to do with those. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 18:07, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
As for the dates thing... well imagine if you were writing for the print media (because Wikipedia articles are printed too). Even if the links somehow magically worked, you'd still have an ambiguous Smith (2016) when printed if two newspapers articles from Smith from 2016 were cited. So you'd still need the a/b thing there. Headbomb { t · c · p · b}
Thanks for uploading File:Elise Mecur Wagner.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:27, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Women in Red June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 17:12, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Thank you for article improvements in May! - DYK our list of people for whose life I'm thankful enough to improve their articles? - I have a FAC open, one of Monteverdi's exceptional works, in memory of Brian who passed me his collected sources. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:26, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Susun , hope you're well. Is it possible that you could recreate a decent article on this? Extremely powerful voice, almost overbearing! If you're busy don't worry though.† Encyclopædius 07:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Great job! What are you oldest GA noms yet to be reviewed?† Encyclopædius 20:36, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Olga Sapphire you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Encyclopædius -- Encyclopædius ( talk) 21:02, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
On 5 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Janina Oyrzanowska-Poplewska, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the veterinarian Janina Oyrzanowska-Poplewska, whose work led to the creation of the first Polish canine distemper vaccine, has been honored as a Righteous Among the Nations? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Janina Oyrzanowska-Poplewska. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Janina Oyrzanowska-Poplewska), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:02, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello SusunW, Please find a first draft for the map you requested on Graphics Lab ( link). It can be altered in any way you wish until it is how you would like it to be, just let me know. Regards, Amitchell125 ( talk) 12:25, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Tilly Bébé at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah ( talk) 17:50, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Olga Sapphire you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Olga Sapphire for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Encyclopædius -- Encyclopædius ( talk) 20:01, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nina Demme you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Enwebb -- Enwebb ( talk) 15:01, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Elise Mercur you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pi.1415926535 -- Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 02:41, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Elise Mercur you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Elise Mercur for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pi.1415926535 -- Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 03:41, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Elise Mercur you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Elise Mercur for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pi.1415926535 -- Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 20:01, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Nina Demme you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nina Demme for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Enwebb -- Enwebb ( talk) 01:41, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Well, I did it, but with major watermarking over her eye, cheekline, and other major parts, I'm not really willing to stand by my restoration, since I do feel it should be thrown out instantly if a less-ruined image is found. I did find the back of the photo, though, and uploaded it into the file history, so if you can fix the documentation, it'll be appreciated.
I'd also appreciate you getting the Wellcome Library image of Sandor Vey up. Wellcome licenses everything CC-by-4.0 - one could argue for PD-Art in some cases, but I'd say let's go with the free license that's documented. Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 7.3% of all FPs 19:13, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
On 14 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tilly Bébé, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tilly Bébé (pictured), a pioneer in the docile training of predators, starred with her lions in a silent film of a genre described as "exotic-erotic-escapist"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tilly Bébé. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Tilly Bébé), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Vanamonde ( Talk) 00:01, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Vespro della Beata Vergine |
Thank you for improving articles in June. I can proudly present a FA, quite a gift after a year without, and a FL is in the making, comments welcome. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 12:45, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
I did see that you have created the wikidata item for Margaret Cuthbert, but we (on wikidata) do have a policy of not adding sexual orientation without proper references. I wasn't able to find anything in the article you wrote to support that, except the whole "buying a summer house together" (I guess with 1 single bed as very good friends or something), which is not enough. Could you add a reference or something that could be used for that ? Ideally one with the explicit word "lesbian", as we also try to stick to the source to avoid bisexual erasure. -- Misc ( talk) 11:31, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi, I just noticed that you created this article and hurried to nominate it at DYK. I'm happy to add more alts if you have other ideas. Also, should the first hook say "she" or "he"? Thanks, Yoninah ( talk) 23:04, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Finished up a couple old projects first, but it's coming along nicely Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 7.3% of all FPs 15:03, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
pale globe-thistle above the Rhine |
Thank you for improving articles in July! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:19, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Coming along, methinks. I'm kind of doing this in between finishing up a bunch of stuff that's been in my half-done list too long that I want rid of, so it's slow, but...
Think you'll probably finally see that International Women's Conference image on the back of this, though. Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 7.3% of all FPs 16:17, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
On 23 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ljuba Prenner, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in the 1950s, Slovene transgender lawyer and writer Ljuba Prenner would introduce himself: "I am Dr. Ljuba Prenner, neither man nor woman"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ljuba Prenner. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Ljuba Prenner), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 35 | ← | Archive 40 | Archive 41 | Archive 42 | Archive 43 | Archive 44 | Archive 45 |
Could you please help dig up a couple more sources for this subject? Thanks. Also Draft:Jana Lund. Draft:Jean Sothern also seems slam dunk notable to me. But waiting on a review. What do you think about Draft:Effie Conley? And finally, I found the work of African Americam WPA writers in Florida very interesting. I started writing up Draft:Viola B. Muse but I don't know if she's independently notable? Maybe an article 9n the broader project? I don't know. Zora Neale Hurston gets a lot of coverage for her involvement but I don't know that herwork was more.important than that of others. Thanks for any in$ights or assistance you can provide. FloridaArmy ( talk) 00:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Fabulous!!! Thanks so much. The clip of Lund in the opening scene of Frankenstein 1970 was interesting. Is there any way to verify that the actress Jean Sothern is the same as the author of "Thumbs Up"? I only turned up copyright notices. Two Effie Conleys!!! Yes, it was strange that she was hanging about in Kentucky. Effie is a pretty unusual name these days I think. Thanks so much. FloridaArmy ( talk) 17:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Draft:Betty Brown (actress) is one I got tangled up on. Do you think one or more of them are worth a write up?
FloridaArmy (
talk)
18:01, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Fabulous!!! Thanks so much. The clip of Lund in the opening scene of Frankenstein 1970 on Youtube was interesting.
Is there any way to verify that the actress Jean Sothern is the same as the author of "Thumbs Up"? I only turned up copyright notices.
Two Effie Conleys!!! Yes, it was strange that she was hanging about in Kentucky. Effie is a pretty unusual name these days I think. Thanks so much. FloridaArmy ( talk) 17:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
On 6 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Patsy Mink, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after twelve medical schools rejected her applications, partly because of her gender, U.S. congresswoman Patsy Mink (pictured) became a lawyer instead? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Patsy Mink. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Patsy Mink), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass ( talk) 12:01, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Fantastic, well done!† Encyclopædius 16:28, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
In all honesty, I am not sure what are the specifics of adding 'owa' to some female surnames in Poland; it is an old custom and a form of conjugation (or rather, possessive I think - Zandbag's would be the literary translation, I think, also possibly related to Grammatical gender) I will ping User:Nihil novi - context of the question is at User_talk:Piotrus#Help?. If you'd like to read more about this particular issue, here are some sources - the first one has an abstract in English: [30], [31]. I will try to look for some sources for you when I can. Regarding photos, [32] is obviously published so it is ok, but I can't access the first one, link is broken for me. Regarding publication, this is crazy (and part of Wikipedia's copyright paranoia, nobody cares about those nuances of copyright outside our community; see my recent question at commons:Commons_talk:Publication#Does_the_copyright_lasts_indefinitely_if_an_image_was_not_published?, and for general reference, commons:User:Piotrus/PolishCopyright. Re the 1926 published photo, yes, PD-Polish should work. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:17, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
I am unsure if she is notable, but she is mentioned in passing here and there. Also known as Franciszka Tusk Scheinwechsler(owa). [36]/ [37]/ [38]. Interesting account is found at [39], note that the next page mentions... Maria Grzegorzewska. Anyway, I wonder if the coverage of Franciszka is significant to merit a stub? Her diary name in Polish is 'Cena jednego życia' ( [40]). But I have trouble confirming it was actually published/reviewed outside of the inclusion in the 1960 book. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:27, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Those your scripts (any version of them) will find problems with. The category is too large to fully compare with your contributions, but it will cover all your creation from A to Su (~89.7% of your creations). Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 17:23, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
{{harvid|'' Foobar''|1949}}
→ {{harvid|''Foobar''|1949}}
, so it was just a small thing to look for that pattern. I don't think your script would have picked up those.
Headbomb {
t ·
c ·
p ·
b}
20:24, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Yup, this is stuff you're better equipped to handle since you're familiar with the articles. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 20:41, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Might be interesting to expand for DYK? Not sure if the creator User:Volunteer Marek plans on doing so? The time window is half-gone. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:36, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Per my talk page
I'm not sure the scripts you have installed will detect those errors, however. Their detection is relatively new and still experimental. But that's the list. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 17:20, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
I took take of most of the low-hanging fruits. I'd focus on the list below if I were you, since that one has known errors. Whereas the 'errors' above aren't exactly critical and we're still trying to improve detection and figure out what to do with those. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 18:07, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
As for the dates thing... well imagine if you were writing for the print media (because Wikipedia articles are printed too). Even if the links somehow magically worked, you'd still have an ambiguous Smith (2016) when printed if two newspapers articles from Smith from 2016 were cited. So you'd still need the a/b thing there. Headbomb { t · c · p · b}
Thanks for uploading File:Elise Mecur Wagner.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:27, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Women in Red June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 17:12, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Thank you for article improvements in May! - DYK our list of people for whose life I'm thankful enough to improve their articles? - I have a FAC open, one of Monteverdi's exceptional works, in memory of Brian who passed me his collected sources. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:26, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Susun , hope you're well. Is it possible that you could recreate a decent article on this? Extremely powerful voice, almost overbearing! If you're busy don't worry though.† Encyclopædius 07:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Great job! What are you oldest GA noms yet to be reviewed?† Encyclopædius 20:36, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Olga Sapphire you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Encyclopædius -- Encyclopædius ( talk) 21:02, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
On 5 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Janina Oyrzanowska-Poplewska, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the veterinarian Janina Oyrzanowska-Poplewska, whose work led to the creation of the first Polish canine distemper vaccine, has been honored as a Righteous Among the Nations? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Janina Oyrzanowska-Poplewska. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Janina Oyrzanowska-Poplewska), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:02, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello SusunW, Please find a first draft for the map you requested on Graphics Lab ( link). It can be altered in any way you wish until it is how you would like it to be, just let me know. Regards, Amitchell125 ( talk) 12:25, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Tilly Bébé at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah ( talk) 17:50, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Olga Sapphire you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Olga Sapphire for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Encyclopædius -- Encyclopædius ( talk) 20:01, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nina Demme you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Enwebb -- Enwebb ( talk) 15:01, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Elise Mercur you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pi.1415926535 -- Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 02:41, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Elise Mercur you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Elise Mercur for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pi.1415926535 -- Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 03:41, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Elise Mercur you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Elise Mercur for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pi.1415926535 -- Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 20:01, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Nina Demme you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nina Demme for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Enwebb -- Enwebb ( talk) 01:41, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Well, I did it, but with major watermarking over her eye, cheekline, and other major parts, I'm not really willing to stand by my restoration, since I do feel it should be thrown out instantly if a less-ruined image is found. I did find the back of the photo, though, and uploaded it into the file history, so if you can fix the documentation, it'll be appreciated.
I'd also appreciate you getting the Wellcome Library image of Sandor Vey up. Wellcome licenses everything CC-by-4.0 - one could argue for PD-Art in some cases, but I'd say let's go with the free license that's documented. Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 7.3% of all FPs 19:13, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
On 14 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tilly Bébé, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tilly Bébé (pictured), a pioneer in the docile training of predators, starred with her lions in a silent film of a genre described as "exotic-erotic-escapist"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tilly Bébé. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Tilly Bébé), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Vanamonde ( Talk) 00:01, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Vespro della Beata Vergine |
Thank you for improving articles in June. I can proudly present a FA, quite a gift after a year without, and a FL is in the making, comments welcome. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 12:45, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
I did see that you have created the wikidata item for Margaret Cuthbert, but we (on wikidata) do have a policy of not adding sexual orientation without proper references. I wasn't able to find anything in the article you wrote to support that, except the whole "buying a summer house together" (I guess with 1 single bed as very good friends or something), which is not enough. Could you add a reference or something that could be used for that ? Ideally one with the explicit word "lesbian", as we also try to stick to the source to avoid bisexual erasure. -- Misc ( talk) 11:31, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi, I just noticed that you created this article and hurried to nominate it at DYK. I'm happy to add more alts if you have other ideas. Also, should the first hook say "she" or "he"? Thanks, Yoninah ( talk) 23:04, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Finished up a couple old projects first, but it's coming along nicely Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 7.3% of all FPs 15:03, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
pale globe-thistle above the Rhine |
Thank you for improving articles in July! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:19, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Coming along, methinks. I'm kind of doing this in between finishing up a bunch of stuff that's been in my half-done list too long that I want rid of, so it's slow, but...
Think you'll probably finally see that International Women's Conference image on the back of this, though. Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 7.3% of all FPs 16:17, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
On 23 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ljuba Prenner, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in the 1950s, Slovene transgender lawyer and writer Ljuba Prenner would introduce himself: "I am Dr. Ljuba Prenner, neither man nor woman"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ljuba Prenner. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Ljuba Prenner), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.