This is an archive of past discussions with SounderBruce. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
< Archive 39 | Archive 40 | Archive 41 > |
All Pages: | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38 - 39 - 40 - 41 - 42 - 43 - 44 - ... (up to 100) |
The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.
Our top scorers in round 2 were:
The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for May 8 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 8, 2022, or to make more comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/May 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild ( talk) 17:23, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
On 10 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nutty Narrows Bridge, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Nutty Narrows Bridge went unused on its first day, despite attempts to lure traffic with peanuts? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nutty Narrows Bridge. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Nutty Narrows Bridge), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 12:03, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Hook update | ||
Your hook reached 8,465 views (705.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2022 – nice work! |
theleekycauldron ( talk • contribs) (she/ they) 02:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Washington State Route 512 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Panini! -- Panini! ( talk) 12:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
The article Washington State Route 512 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Washington State Route 512 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Panini! -- Panini! ( talk) 13:01, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Washington State Route 292 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski ( talk) 15:40, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi, you may not have remembered, but you reassessed George Town, Penang's GA status back in 2018. It has been found out that the entire GA process was done via deceptive sockpuppetry. This could have had influenced your judgement, not to mention the sockmaster also commenting on the reassessment you started. Do see this for more information. Paul K. Sutton ( talk) 09:26, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi! Just wanted to stop by and say that this is a really cool article, and thanks for all you do around here. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 15:43, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Washington State Route 512 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 ( talk · contributions) 07:35, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
The article Washington State Route 292 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Washington State Route 292 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski ( talk) 06:21, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of 2022 CONCACAF Champions League Final at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. All is good, just waiting on you to do a QPQ. Legoktm ( talk) 23:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
In the Seattle area?
We are resuming
Seattle monthly meetups on Tuesday, May 17, 2022, 5:45pm to 7:45pm at the
Distant Worlds Coffeehouse. For the address and to RSVP, please click here. |
I am not the first person to come to your talk page to complain about this sort of issue.
You are not the arbiter of what does or does not stand in articles relating to Washington, though you certainly act as if you do hold that role. This is not your encyclopedia, it's not my encyclopedia, it's our encyclopedia. I've gotten used to making edits that improve stubs around Eastern Washington and then waiting for you to come in eliminate them to say nothing more than, effectively, "because I said so."
Next time you make a revert to an edit that I, or anyone, makes, especially those that include legitimate sources, please provide more than, "not a reliable source" when you make the change. Please, do like we do and cite your source as to why it isn't. Then, I'll listen. Otherwise, you're coming across as someone on a power trip saying because I said so. I look forward to continuing to contribute to Wikipedia and unfortunately expect to keep encountering you acting like someone on a power trip.
Sincerely, (full and real name) Will Maupin SpokaneWilly ( talk) 05:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:ORCA card logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:54, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Hungry? Here's a little snack for you on your birthday, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day, SounderBruce! -- 𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 ( talk) 00:12, 13 May 2022 (UTC) |
Just a happy Birthday message to you, SounderBruce, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!-- Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 12:40, 13 May 2022 (UTC) |
On 15 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Washington State Route 512, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the construction of Washington State Route 512 included a new high school football stadium to replace a demolished one? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Washington State Route 512. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Washington State Route 512), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:02, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
You recently removed bolding for three individuals mentioned in the Pickleball article in the History section. The reason the three individuals were bolded is because none of them warrant their own article, but they do each have a redirect to the Pickleball#History section. The bolding is to allow anyone being redirected to the Pickleball article to locate the name they had typed in. OvertAnalyzer ( talk) 17:28, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
On 22 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2022 CONCACAF Champions League Final, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that by winning the 2022 CONCACAF Champions League Final, Seattle Sounders FC became the first Major League Soccer team to win the competition? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2022 CONCACAF Champions League Final. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, 2022 CONCACAF Champions League Final), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 12:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. |
Template:STLinkLR style has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 08:18, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:S-line/STLinkLR left/1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 08:18, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:S-line/STLinkLR right/1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 08:18, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:CTSwift lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 08:27, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:CTSwift stations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 08:27, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:S-line/CTSwift left/Blue has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 08:27, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:S-line/CTSwift right/Blue has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 08:27, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:RapidRide color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 08:29, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:RapidRide lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 08:29, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:RapidRide stations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 08:29, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:S-line/RapidRide left/E has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 08:29, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Hiya SounderBruce! I'm heading out to the Seattle Area, as well as Olympic National Park. A lot of my amateur photography is on my good ol' DJI Mini 2, and I was wondering if you wanted any places in the Seattle area aerially photographed? I can't legally fly in the national park, but I'm heading to areas such as Forks, Washington and Port Angeles, Washington, which are outside of the NP boundaries, so I can legally fly there. Here's my current list for Seattle: Climate Pledge Arena, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Amazon Spheres, T-Mobile Park, Lumen Field, and a random view of the Port of Seattle. Port Angeles has some weird DJI drone restrictions that make it almost impossible to fly in, so I'm not sure about there. Finally, I have nothing to get a photo of in Forks other than a aerial view of downtown. If you have anyplace in specific you want photographed, just reply! I'd love to help out the Seattle area Wikipedia pages. Cheers! Sea Cow ( talk) 23:58, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Burke Museum logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 13:12, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Hey Bruce! Hope all is well with you. I wanted to get your feedback on a sort of beta test on a new project: Template:American transit ridership.
As you know, trying to keep the daily and annual ridership updated on most agency pages is a game of wack-a-mole. Some pages get a lot of love and are regularly updated, some may go years between updates. My thought is that putting all of that data in one central location will allow for one page to be updated, and have that trickle down to all agency pages at one times.
So... I've added my proposed changes to the Seattle Streetcar and Trolleybuses in Seattle pages because they provide a good idea of the functionality I am trying to include.
I would love to get your thoughts on any changes/features you'd like to see before I start using this on more pages. RickyCourtney ( talk) 17:25, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
SounderBruce, I noticed you opened a new GA review at the beginning of this week. I wanted to remind you that you had previously opened K-101 (Kansas highway) for review, and haven't started it yet. I hope you'll give it priority over the newer one, assuming you still wish to pursue it. (If not, let me know, and I'll be happy to arrange to put the nomination back into the pool of unreviewed nominations.) Thank you very much. BlueMoonset ( talk) 02:18, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, SounderBruce. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Interstate 205 (Oregon–Washington) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:49, 19 June 2022 (UTC) |
Hi SounderBruce,
The updates made to the Black Diamond, WA page outlining the signification of the First Master Planned Development on the City of Black Diamond were removed on the grounds of:
I agree history should be neutral, non-bias, fact driven, with factual sources referenced.
Question: Given the below (impact of the Master Planned Development; structure and content used by other cities pages), how do we outline the significance of how the First Master Planned Development has and is reshaping the City of Black Diamond, within the city of Black Diamonds wiki page?
How the First Master Planned Development Is Neutral And Black Diamond's Rebirth
In the late 1800, the City of Black Diamond was originally named due to the coal (black diamonds) the locals mined for a living.
In the mid 1900's, coal mining died off, with the dying off of coal mining, so did the lively hoods, and the future of the City of Black Diamond.
Fast forward to 1990, in 1990 a new Black Diamond City Planner had an opportunity to create something that had never been created before in the state of WA, that being a Master Planned Development (
source).
The significance of the first Master Planned Development for the City of Black Diamond has been covered by major news sources such as KUOW (
source), Seattle Times (
source), and many others.
The First Master Planned Development and has gone on public record to be the largest Master Planned Development in all of
King County (the same county
Seattle is in)(
source).
Due to the sheer size (
156 acres; largest Master Planned Development in King County) the Master Planned Development is not only part of Black Diamonds history, it is literally reshaping the city and everything around it; more over, what is odd is most people are not aware this reshaping is part of a master planning going all the back to 1996.
Just like the or coal mining, or the depression, the implementation of a Master Planed Development has and is reshaping the City of Black Diamond into something historically and significantly different -- all by design.
What We Are Trying To Do - Help People Understand Current History, And Reshaping of Black Diamond, likend to
Seattle's Wikipedia page
The inspiration we took in crafting the
Black Diamond information was from the
Seattle and
San Francisco pages:
|
|
Restating The Question: Given the above (impact of the Master Planned Development; structure and content used by other cities pages), how do we outline the significance of how the First Master Planned Development has and is reshaping the City of Black Diamond, within the city of Black Diamonds wiki page?
Regards,
NateJ.Wiki (
talk) 21:07, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
I don't mean this in a rude or angry way and I hope it doesn't come off as such, I'm just curious. I hope I didn't break any rules when I added the info, I just thought that it would be interesting to note it on the wiki page with how popular Homestuck is/was and that the address John lived in was actually real and findable on Google Maps. Hope you have a great rest of your day.
-- Anethea ( talk) 23:45, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:United States bus rapid transit succession templates by state indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Gonnym ( talk) 08:56, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
The third round of the 2022 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 180 points, which is a lower figure than last year when 294 points were needed to progress to round 4. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
Between them contestants achieved 5 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 51 good articles, 149 DYK entries, 68 ITN entries, and 109 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article nomination, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. WikiCup judges: Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) and Cwmhiraeth ( talk) MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
I looked at your home page and your contribution records, you may be well versed in the geography and human environment of the western states of the US. I am updating the climate data for some places in Washington state these days, such as Kent and Aberdeen, but you have withdrawn me A data addition above Bellingham, and you didn't give any reason, and Mean maximum and Mean minimum are available via weather.gov. 迷斯拉10032号 ( talk) 08:03, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Can you review the DYK nomination used for this article? Sportsfangnome ( talk) 15:44, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Hey there, I just wanted to get some clarity on why the information I included on five of the six future Millennium Line stations was reverted. While I understand the rules surrounding WP:CRYSTALBALL, I don't think the information I included coincided with the ideas of prediction, extrapolation or speculation, since the bus connections currently exist in the exact location where the stations are being constructed. I will concede that the specificities of the bay numbers have not been determined, which is why I left a "?" for the time being. Please let me know if I'm misunderstanding something, or if you think that we can re-revert the information given my further explanation. EnigmaticSigma ( talk) 19:56, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, SounderBruce. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for MLS Cup 1999 at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 05:42, 4 August 2022 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading File:Washington State Department of Natural Resources logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:30, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello SounderBruce,
I noticed that you undid my additions on Coulee Corridor Scenic Byway, stating that it is an disambiguation page. This must be a misunderstanding. The point is that this article is not a disambiguation page but an article about one of the routes that is part of the National Scenic Byway system. Therefore i've decided to undo your action.
Offcourse you can contact me when you still don't agree.
Regards Weetjesman Weetjesman ( talk) 10:55, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello SounderBruce, now it's clear. I will leave the article like it is.
Regards Weetjesman ( talk) 20:55, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of 2022 U.S. Open Cup Final at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mhhossein talk 10:29, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
The file File:Seal of Snohomish County.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused. Superseded by File:Seal of Snohomish County, Washington.svg.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
Minorax«¦
talk¦» 14:33, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
The fourth round of the WikiCup has now finished. 383 points were required to reach the final, and the new round has got off to a flying start with all finalists already scoring. In round 4, Bloom6132 with 939 points was the highest points-scorer, with a combination of DYKs and In the news items, followed by BennyOnTheLoose, Sammi Brie and Lee Vilenski. The points of all contestants are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.
At this stage, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For the remaining competitors, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and importantly, before the deadline on October 31st!
If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. The judges are Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:44, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the Interstate 90 article has been scheduled as today's featured article for October 18, 2022. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 18, 2022, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.
For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.
We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:44, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi Bruce! I just sent you an email for a story I'm working on about Wikipedia editors updating Queen Elizabeth Wikipedia page after her death. Let me know if you'd be open to chat today. Kaimcnamee ( talk) 15:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
On 4 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2022 U.S. Open Cup Final, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2022 U.S. Open Cup Final was the first in 14 years to feature a non- Major League Soccer team? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2022 U.S. Open Cup Final. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, 2022 U.S. Open Cup Final), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:02, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi Bruce! I stumbled upon this user page at OpenHistoricalMap: Natfoot. Among the projects he lists are:
I thought that might interest you! Peaceray ( talk) 04:54, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 20 November 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 20, 2022, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/November 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild ( talk) 14:54, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Sports event article need symbol section like 1998 FIFA World Cup. Only 1998 FIFA World Cup had a symbol section. So I added a sympbol section in 1990 FIFA World Cup, 1994 FIFA World Cup, 2002 FIFA World Cup and I added reliable source from FIFA Official Website.
I don't understand that What Problem is ?
Besides, Inserting a non-free image at 2002 FIFA World Cup article is just a mistake.
Footwiks ( talk) 07:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with SounderBruce. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
< Archive 39 | Archive 40 | Archive 41 > |
All Pages: | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38 - 39 - 40 - 41 - 42 - 43 - 44 - ... (up to 100) |
The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.
Our top scorers in round 2 were:
The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for May 8 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 8, 2022, or to make more comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/May 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild ( talk) 17:23, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
On 10 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nutty Narrows Bridge, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Nutty Narrows Bridge went unused on its first day, despite attempts to lure traffic with peanuts? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nutty Narrows Bridge. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Nutty Narrows Bridge), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 12:03, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Hook update | ||
Your hook reached 8,465 views (705.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2022 – nice work! |
theleekycauldron ( talk • contribs) (she/ they) 02:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Washington State Route 512 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Panini! -- Panini! ( talk) 12:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
The article Washington State Route 512 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Washington State Route 512 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Panini! -- Panini! ( talk) 13:01, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Washington State Route 292 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski ( talk) 15:40, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi, you may not have remembered, but you reassessed George Town, Penang's GA status back in 2018. It has been found out that the entire GA process was done via deceptive sockpuppetry. This could have had influenced your judgement, not to mention the sockmaster also commenting on the reassessment you started. Do see this for more information. Paul K. Sutton ( talk) 09:26, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi! Just wanted to stop by and say that this is a really cool article, and thanks for all you do around here. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 15:43, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Washington State Route 512 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 ( talk · contributions) 07:35, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
The article Washington State Route 292 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Washington State Route 292 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski ( talk) 06:21, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of 2022 CONCACAF Champions League Final at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. All is good, just waiting on you to do a QPQ. Legoktm ( talk) 23:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
In the Seattle area?
We are resuming
Seattle monthly meetups on Tuesday, May 17, 2022, 5:45pm to 7:45pm at the
Distant Worlds Coffeehouse. For the address and to RSVP, please click here. |
I am not the first person to come to your talk page to complain about this sort of issue.
You are not the arbiter of what does or does not stand in articles relating to Washington, though you certainly act as if you do hold that role. This is not your encyclopedia, it's not my encyclopedia, it's our encyclopedia. I've gotten used to making edits that improve stubs around Eastern Washington and then waiting for you to come in eliminate them to say nothing more than, effectively, "because I said so."
Next time you make a revert to an edit that I, or anyone, makes, especially those that include legitimate sources, please provide more than, "not a reliable source" when you make the change. Please, do like we do and cite your source as to why it isn't. Then, I'll listen. Otherwise, you're coming across as someone on a power trip saying because I said so. I look forward to continuing to contribute to Wikipedia and unfortunately expect to keep encountering you acting like someone on a power trip.
Sincerely, (full and real name) Will Maupin SpokaneWilly ( talk) 05:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:ORCA card logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:54, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Hungry? Here's a little snack for you on your birthday, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day, SounderBruce! -- 𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 ( talk) 00:12, 13 May 2022 (UTC) |
Just a happy Birthday message to you, SounderBruce, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!-- Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 12:40, 13 May 2022 (UTC) |
On 15 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Washington State Route 512, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the construction of Washington State Route 512 included a new high school football stadium to replace a demolished one? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Washington State Route 512. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Washington State Route 512), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:02, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
You recently removed bolding for three individuals mentioned in the Pickleball article in the History section. The reason the three individuals were bolded is because none of them warrant their own article, but they do each have a redirect to the Pickleball#History section. The bolding is to allow anyone being redirected to the Pickleball article to locate the name they had typed in. OvertAnalyzer ( talk) 17:28, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
On 22 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2022 CONCACAF Champions League Final, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that by winning the 2022 CONCACAF Champions League Final, Seattle Sounders FC became the first Major League Soccer team to win the competition? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2022 CONCACAF Champions League Final. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, 2022 CONCACAF Champions League Final), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 12:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. |
Template:STLinkLR style has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 08:18, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:S-line/STLinkLR left/1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 08:18, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:S-line/STLinkLR right/1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 08:18, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:CTSwift lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 08:27, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:CTSwift stations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 08:27, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:S-line/CTSwift left/Blue has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 08:27, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:S-line/CTSwift right/Blue has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 08:27, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:RapidRide color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 08:29, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:RapidRide lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 08:29, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:RapidRide stations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 08:29, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:S-line/RapidRide left/E has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 08:29, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Hiya SounderBruce! I'm heading out to the Seattle Area, as well as Olympic National Park. A lot of my amateur photography is on my good ol' DJI Mini 2, and I was wondering if you wanted any places in the Seattle area aerially photographed? I can't legally fly in the national park, but I'm heading to areas such as Forks, Washington and Port Angeles, Washington, which are outside of the NP boundaries, so I can legally fly there. Here's my current list for Seattle: Climate Pledge Arena, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Amazon Spheres, T-Mobile Park, Lumen Field, and a random view of the Port of Seattle. Port Angeles has some weird DJI drone restrictions that make it almost impossible to fly in, so I'm not sure about there. Finally, I have nothing to get a photo of in Forks other than a aerial view of downtown. If you have anyplace in specific you want photographed, just reply! I'd love to help out the Seattle area Wikipedia pages. Cheers! Sea Cow ( talk) 23:58, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Burke Museum logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 13:12, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Hey Bruce! Hope all is well with you. I wanted to get your feedback on a sort of beta test on a new project: Template:American transit ridership.
As you know, trying to keep the daily and annual ridership updated on most agency pages is a game of wack-a-mole. Some pages get a lot of love and are regularly updated, some may go years between updates. My thought is that putting all of that data in one central location will allow for one page to be updated, and have that trickle down to all agency pages at one times.
So... I've added my proposed changes to the Seattle Streetcar and Trolleybuses in Seattle pages because they provide a good idea of the functionality I am trying to include.
I would love to get your thoughts on any changes/features you'd like to see before I start using this on more pages. RickyCourtney ( talk) 17:25, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
SounderBruce, I noticed you opened a new GA review at the beginning of this week. I wanted to remind you that you had previously opened K-101 (Kansas highway) for review, and haven't started it yet. I hope you'll give it priority over the newer one, assuming you still wish to pursue it. (If not, let me know, and I'll be happy to arrange to put the nomination back into the pool of unreviewed nominations.) Thank you very much. BlueMoonset ( talk) 02:18, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, SounderBruce. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Interstate 205 (Oregon–Washington) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:49, 19 June 2022 (UTC) |
Hi SounderBruce,
The updates made to the Black Diamond, WA page outlining the signification of the First Master Planned Development on the City of Black Diamond were removed on the grounds of:
I agree history should be neutral, non-bias, fact driven, with factual sources referenced.
Question: Given the below (impact of the Master Planned Development; structure and content used by other cities pages), how do we outline the significance of how the First Master Planned Development has and is reshaping the City of Black Diamond, within the city of Black Diamonds wiki page?
How the First Master Planned Development Is Neutral And Black Diamond's Rebirth
In the late 1800, the City of Black Diamond was originally named due to the coal (black diamonds) the locals mined for a living.
In the mid 1900's, coal mining died off, with the dying off of coal mining, so did the lively hoods, and the future of the City of Black Diamond.
Fast forward to 1990, in 1990 a new Black Diamond City Planner had an opportunity to create something that had never been created before in the state of WA, that being a Master Planned Development (
source).
The significance of the first Master Planned Development for the City of Black Diamond has been covered by major news sources such as KUOW (
source), Seattle Times (
source), and many others.
The First Master Planned Development and has gone on public record to be the largest Master Planned Development in all of
King County (the same county
Seattle is in)(
source).
Due to the sheer size (
156 acres; largest Master Planned Development in King County) the Master Planned Development is not only part of Black Diamonds history, it is literally reshaping the city and everything around it; more over, what is odd is most people are not aware this reshaping is part of a master planning going all the back to 1996.
Just like the or coal mining, or the depression, the implementation of a Master Planed Development has and is reshaping the City of Black Diamond into something historically and significantly different -- all by design.
What We Are Trying To Do - Help People Understand Current History, And Reshaping of Black Diamond, likend to
Seattle's Wikipedia page
The inspiration we took in crafting the
Black Diamond information was from the
Seattle and
San Francisco pages:
|
|
Restating The Question: Given the above (impact of the Master Planned Development; structure and content used by other cities pages), how do we outline the significance of how the First Master Planned Development has and is reshaping the City of Black Diamond, within the city of Black Diamonds wiki page?
Regards,
NateJ.Wiki (
talk) 21:07, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
I don't mean this in a rude or angry way and I hope it doesn't come off as such, I'm just curious. I hope I didn't break any rules when I added the info, I just thought that it would be interesting to note it on the wiki page with how popular Homestuck is/was and that the address John lived in was actually real and findable on Google Maps. Hope you have a great rest of your day.
-- Anethea ( talk) 23:45, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:United States bus rapid transit succession templates by state indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Gonnym ( talk) 08:56, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
The third round of the 2022 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 180 points, which is a lower figure than last year when 294 points were needed to progress to round 4. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
Between them contestants achieved 5 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 51 good articles, 149 DYK entries, 68 ITN entries, and 109 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article nomination, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. WikiCup judges: Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) and Cwmhiraeth ( talk) MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
I looked at your home page and your contribution records, you may be well versed in the geography and human environment of the western states of the US. I am updating the climate data for some places in Washington state these days, such as Kent and Aberdeen, but you have withdrawn me A data addition above Bellingham, and you didn't give any reason, and Mean maximum and Mean minimum are available via weather.gov. 迷斯拉10032号 ( talk) 08:03, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Can you review the DYK nomination used for this article? Sportsfangnome ( talk) 15:44, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Hey there, I just wanted to get some clarity on why the information I included on five of the six future Millennium Line stations was reverted. While I understand the rules surrounding WP:CRYSTALBALL, I don't think the information I included coincided with the ideas of prediction, extrapolation or speculation, since the bus connections currently exist in the exact location where the stations are being constructed. I will concede that the specificities of the bay numbers have not been determined, which is why I left a "?" for the time being. Please let me know if I'm misunderstanding something, or if you think that we can re-revert the information given my further explanation. EnigmaticSigma ( talk) 19:56, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, SounderBruce. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for MLS Cup 1999 at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 05:42, 4 August 2022 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading File:Washington State Department of Natural Resources logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:30, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello SounderBruce,
I noticed that you undid my additions on Coulee Corridor Scenic Byway, stating that it is an disambiguation page. This must be a misunderstanding. The point is that this article is not a disambiguation page but an article about one of the routes that is part of the National Scenic Byway system. Therefore i've decided to undo your action.
Offcourse you can contact me when you still don't agree.
Regards Weetjesman Weetjesman ( talk) 10:55, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello SounderBruce, now it's clear. I will leave the article like it is.
Regards Weetjesman ( talk) 20:55, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of 2022 U.S. Open Cup Final at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mhhossein talk 10:29, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
The file File:Seal of Snohomish County.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused. Superseded by File:Seal of Snohomish County, Washington.svg.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
Minorax«¦
talk¦» 14:33, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
The fourth round of the WikiCup has now finished. 383 points were required to reach the final, and the new round has got off to a flying start with all finalists already scoring. In round 4, Bloom6132 with 939 points was the highest points-scorer, with a combination of DYKs and In the news items, followed by BennyOnTheLoose, Sammi Brie and Lee Vilenski. The points of all contestants are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.
At this stage, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For the remaining competitors, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and importantly, before the deadline on October 31st!
If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. The judges are Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:44, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the Interstate 90 article has been scheduled as today's featured article for October 18, 2022. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 18, 2022, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.
For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.
We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:44, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi Bruce! I just sent you an email for a story I'm working on about Wikipedia editors updating Queen Elizabeth Wikipedia page after her death. Let me know if you'd be open to chat today. Kaimcnamee ( talk) 15:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
On 4 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2022 U.S. Open Cup Final, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2022 U.S. Open Cup Final was the first in 14 years to feature a non- Major League Soccer team? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2022 U.S. Open Cup Final. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, 2022 U.S. Open Cup Final), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:02, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi Bruce! I stumbled upon this user page at OpenHistoricalMap: Natfoot. Among the projects he lists are:
I thought that might interest you! Peaceray ( talk) 04:54, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 20 November 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 20, 2022, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/November 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild ( talk) 14:54, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Sports event article need symbol section like 1998 FIFA World Cup. Only 1998 FIFA World Cup had a symbol section. So I added a sympbol section in 1990 FIFA World Cup, 1994 FIFA World Cup, 2002 FIFA World Cup and I added reliable source from FIFA Official Website.
I don't understand that What Problem is ?
Besides, Inserting a non-free image at 2002 FIFA World Cup article is just a mistake.
Footwiks ( talk) 07:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)