![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A belated thanks for reverting the sock on my talk page. (And it seems that I accidentally thanked the wrong person- really shouldn't do things on mobile). VickKiang (talk) 06:26, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi ScottishFinnishRadish. :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 13:16, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, ScottishFinnishRadish. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Da'Vion Tatum, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 00:06, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello. I think you might want to monitor the discussion taking place at Trump's talkpage. GoodDay ( talk) 19:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Apologies for picking a sane-seeming person to vent to, but what a weird rule! I think there are good reasons why the real world strictly separates bringing cases from trying them.
I'm sure that lots of Wikipedia specific experience went into WP:VEXBYSTERANG but the most obvious unintended consequence would be that many people with useful information will decline to be witnesses. If the idea was to reduce workload on the court, obviously it does the opposite of that. - Palpable ( talk) 17:17, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi ScottishFinnishRadish. Thank you for your help. The same user created another such page:
Justice for Some: Law and the Question of Palestine
Can it please be deleted?
I have also filed a complaint against him in AE, as he continues to do it. Dovidroth ( talk) 06:44, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Latkes for you |
Your quick and tireless admin work is always appreciated. Andre 🚐 00:43, 9 December 2023 (UTC) |
I see that the page was deleted due to the page's creator being a sockpuppet or banned? If so, could you paste the transcript of the old page so I can re-upload it. As you can see, I'm not a banned user. so there probably shouldn't be an issue. Genabab ( talk) 13:32, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Why is the article on Jake Wallis Simons protected? I could not find the explanation. -- Babel fish ( talk) 14:40, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
It was reported in other media (The Guardian, TMZ, Daily Beast, SkyNews Australia, Metro, msn.com and others), I originally was going to cite the Daily Mail but wikipedia said that was not a reliable source so I referenced Page Six which had the exclusive from the production company. How do I find out which press is considered "reliable"? thank you for your help Honore1 ( talk) 15:39, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi, sorry for keeping on dragging you into things but would you mind taking a look at the edits of this two-month-old account? They've made like 60 recent edits adding thousands of characters of unsourced "fun facts" relating to county election results, and while it's not worthy of being brought to ANI, I feel like they should be rolled back en bloc? There are too many for me to deal with this without those tools. I'll reach out to the user soon, but I've got a lot on my plate and could just use a second set of eyes. Thanks. Cpotisch ( talk) 18:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
If an edit is reverted citing WP:ECR, shouldn't the page be then ExCon protected? Primefac ( talk) 21:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
I don't understand the latter part of the sentence: "Asking editors to read a source and reconstruct why a non-expert believes something is off-topic." [1] Can you explain it to me? Who is the non-expert you are referring to, Jimmy Wales?And isn't it the job of editors to accurately represent what actual experts say in reliable sources (RS), whether or not they themselves are experts? Have you actually read the article before closing? XMcan ( talk) 10:18, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
My edit to the talk page for human genital modification should not have been reverted because it was relevant to improving the article depending on how improvement is defined. The world majority is being logically inconsistent about this just like just like how the majority was logically inconsistent in Nazi Germany, the Antebellum South, the Jim Crowe South, etc. Pointing out an inconsistency in the majority position could be seen as potentially allowing an article to use phrasing that is more logically consistent, which could be viewed as an improvement.
In Short, KlayCax posted a questionable assertion about the absence of dysfunction with nothing to back it up. This assertion promotes the use of inconsistent terminology in the article. By challenging his assertion, I hoped to add points for future editors to consider when thinking about whether or not the article is using the most consistent terminology. I hope you will reconsider or accept some compromised form of my talk page edit, but I will respect your decision.
2600:6C58:6500:C06:8E1:4719:1F63:C590 ( talk) 10:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Robert McClenon ( talk) 16:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy Holidays | |
Hello, I want to be the first to wish you the very best during the holidays. We may not have been on the best terms in the past, but we are each working toward the same goal! Lightburst ( talk) 18:37, 15 December 2023 (UTC) |
Are personal Tweets and personal Substack writings in general deemed unreliable sources for Wikipedia purposes? If so, is there any particular reason for this? 172.56.185.241 ( talk) 04:31, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
those who pretend support Palestinian cause like Jackson Hinkle use misinformation to lure followers on Twitter and Sulaiman Ahmed who is Tate's lawyer whom everybody reblog his post, unaware he had connection with human trafficker Tate by -- Sunuraju ( talk) 08:19, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Sláinte! |
You probably don't remember, so let me remind you that I was one of those who !voted against you at your RfA. :) And I'm so glad to be discovering that I got that wrong. (Yes, children, it does happen, believe it or not.) Since then I've not seen anything to worry about at all, but not only that, I'm constantly impressed by how you handle the mop. Great job, I mean that.
So as a small peace offering on this winter's evening, may I tempt you with a cup o' kindness yet, my favourite uisge beatha. (I might have a drop myself, goes well with my humble pie...) PS: Not that it will be of much interest to you, but I also find your username intriguing, as a) I'm Finnish, and b) I genuinely think I must have been Scottish in my previous life. Uhh, and c) I quite like radishes. Cheers, -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 20:08, 17 December 2023 (UTC) |
Should account creation be blocked as likely sockpuppetry? Cf. Special:Diff/1190447488 ChaotıċEnby( t · c) 23:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Just wanted to be sure you knew Tryptofish was recovering from surgery when he made the less than ideal edit.
And, happy holidays. Don't eat too many radishes. O3000, Ret. ( talk) 01:17, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
@
Nableezy and
Andrevan: I just wanted to reach out and thank you for the agreement. I know you don't see eye to eye, but if there is going to be any chance at reasonable administration things need to calm down a bit. There are very few of us patrolling AE and ARBPIA articles, and if there's going to be any chance of admins actively watching and engaging on these topics
effectively then turning down the heat is necessary. The talk page of
2023 Israel-Hamas war is currently sitting at about one
tomats and 31 archive pages nearly the same size. And that's just one of the articles.
I didn't have a chance to look into the deeper part of the dispute, but if it comes up again I'd much prefer short to the point statements. Nableezy, I understand rhetorical flourishes like That is, and Im trying my best not to say lie here, not true. And it is very difficult to productively discuss content when somebody says something so blatantly untrue.
are a common way to communicate your point and frustration, but to me it's 30 more words I have to read that don't add anything. Andre, you wrote a lot that didn't have much to do with the issue at hand. I'm not trying to chastise either of you, or demand you respect my time. I'm begging you take pity on me and the other admins. You've both seen me and some others picking all the low hanging fruit, closing RFCs, issuing warnings, blocking disruptors, but when something complicated comes up it's hours of work. Please try and make it a bit easier. I'm really trying my best and spending piles of time on this, so anything you can do to lessen the burden would be appreciated.
I also know you two aren't the only editors involved, the only two going back and forth, you just happen to be the two primary editors involved in that last AE. Feel free to ping any other editors here that might benefit from reading my pitiful plea.
Long complex disputes that AE can't handle are how things end up back at arbcom, and no one (I hope) wants that. If you, or anyone else, has any ideas about how to settle the topic area I'd love to hear it as well. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 02:48, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
challenged text
text from source
simply for Admins to patrol the most contentious pages when they feel they have a little time to spareI've often felt this myself for the content areas I edit in (GENSEX and its intersection with AP2), but there's a problem. WP:INVOLVED. For better or for worse, the community has chosen to interpret INVOLVED very broadly. If an admin starts to do this sort of patrol, sooner or later they will cross the threshold where the regulars in that area will see them as too involved to take impartial actions. Typically by the time an admin is well versed enough in the content, and the behaviours of the regulars to start to identify problematic editors they are seen as too involved to do anything. Short of the community consensus changing on this point, I don't see this being an action that is sustainable. Sideswipe9th ( talk) 03:38, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
You blocked .131, .132, and .133 for one year. Now they have reappeared at .134. They appear to be Windscripe VPN nodes. You might consider blocking the range assigned 38.95.12.0/23 (at least according to WHOIS). — Archer ( t· c) 08:29, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
I'm sure you know this area better than I... in fact, is it surprising to you that it hasn't been designated a CT? Valereee ( talk) 16:12, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi! I apologize if you're busy, but I wanted to seek your input on a possible issue with an editor you blocked. I have commented on KlayCax's talk page after noticing unusual overlap between them and a very new editor. Another editor has expressed that they suspect an overlap (see this discussion). If you think there's enough evidence for an SPI, please let me know. Best, ~ Pbritti ( talk) 20:57, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
You might want to see this [3]. The IP address is threatening to use a different IP address to disrupt Wikipedia. Maybe is it a good idea to protect Talk:Stockton Rush for a few days or so? 🛧 Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 06:18, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
❄️ Happy holidays! ❄️
Hi ScottishFinnishRadish! I'd like to wish you a splendid solstice season as we wrap up the year. Here is an artwork, made individually for you, to celebrate. I hope your root vegetables flourish in the coming year :) Take care, and thanks for all you do to make Wikipedia better!Cheers,{{u| Sdkb}} talk 07:01, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you removed my membership from extended confirmed users on the basis that I was violating ECR. What are those violations? My understanding was that my original violations were due to editing content that was not locked but still considered ARBPIA. Now that I have reached the requirement for EC, why did you consider my newer edits as violations? Also if you could explain why you consider my edit history to be gaming ECR that would be very appreciated.
Thank you
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Log&logid=157067912 DMH43 ( talk) 15:01, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
I have revoked your extended-confirmed permissions for gaming 30/500, and returning immediately to ARBPIA, including restoring some of your original ECR violations, upon reaching 500 edits, as well as immediately ending all editing outside of ARBPIA.ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 15:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
I have appealed your revoking of my EC membership: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Appeal_of_the_removal_of_EC_membership_for_User:DMH43 DMH43 ( talk) 17:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
one :)
Also happy whatever, my spicy root friend. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 20:02, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, ScottishFinnishRadish! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year!
Chris Troutman (
talk)
23:06, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
{{subst:User:Shearonink/Holiday}}
to your friends' talk pages.(Sent: 02:18, 25 December 2023 (UTC)) Shearonink ( talk) 02:18, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! |
Hello ScottishFinnishRadish, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
🛧 Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 03:29, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
‑‑
Neveselbert (
talk ·
contribs ·
email) is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas!
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. |
‑‑ Neveselbert ( talk · contribs · email) 17:16, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
I significally toned down the message
[4] and withdrew what was unuseful and inappropriate.
I am engaging myself here to comment on content and only on content from now on, and not write comments on users in any case anymore.
I added valuable, balanced and measured content that have improved the articles
[5].
Iennes (
talk)
18:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar |
Instead of an appeal... I've got... characteristically... ANOTHER BARNSTAR FOR YOU INSTEAD. Do you know any other topic banned editors that sent a barnstar to their banning admin right after being banned? I bet you do not. I know this was a difficult decision and you're already getting flak for it, so let me not be one of those. I'll take this feedback under advisement and self-reflection. Andre 🚐 22:15, 26 December 2023 (UTC) |
WP:AE#Arbitration enforcement action appeal by Nableezy nableezy - 20:36, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A belated thanks for reverting the sock on my talk page. (And it seems that I accidentally thanked the wrong person- really shouldn't do things on mobile). VickKiang (talk) 06:26, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi ScottishFinnishRadish. :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 13:16, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, ScottishFinnishRadish. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Da'Vion Tatum, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 00:06, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello. I think you might want to monitor the discussion taking place at Trump's talkpage. GoodDay ( talk) 19:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Apologies for picking a sane-seeming person to vent to, but what a weird rule! I think there are good reasons why the real world strictly separates bringing cases from trying them.
I'm sure that lots of Wikipedia specific experience went into WP:VEXBYSTERANG but the most obvious unintended consequence would be that many people with useful information will decline to be witnesses. If the idea was to reduce workload on the court, obviously it does the opposite of that. - Palpable ( talk) 17:17, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi ScottishFinnishRadish. Thank you for your help. The same user created another such page:
Justice for Some: Law and the Question of Palestine
Can it please be deleted?
I have also filed a complaint against him in AE, as he continues to do it. Dovidroth ( talk) 06:44, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Latkes for you |
Your quick and tireless admin work is always appreciated. Andre 🚐 00:43, 9 December 2023 (UTC) |
I see that the page was deleted due to the page's creator being a sockpuppet or banned? If so, could you paste the transcript of the old page so I can re-upload it. As you can see, I'm not a banned user. so there probably shouldn't be an issue. Genabab ( talk) 13:32, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Why is the article on Jake Wallis Simons protected? I could not find the explanation. -- Babel fish ( talk) 14:40, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
It was reported in other media (The Guardian, TMZ, Daily Beast, SkyNews Australia, Metro, msn.com and others), I originally was going to cite the Daily Mail but wikipedia said that was not a reliable source so I referenced Page Six which had the exclusive from the production company. How do I find out which press is considered "reliable"? thank you for your help Honore1 ( talk) 15:39, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi, sorry for keeping on dragging you into things but would you mind taking a look at the edits of this two-month-old account? They've made like 60 recent edits adding thousands of characters of unsourced "fun facts" relating to county election results, and while it's not worthy of being brought to ANI, I feel like they should be rolled back en bloc? There are too many for me to deal with this without those tools. I'll reach out to the user soon, but I've got a lot on my plate and could just use a second set of eyes. Thanks. Cpotisch ( talk) 18:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
If an edit is reverted citing WP:ECR, shouldn't the page be then ExCon protected? Primefac ( talk) 21:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
I don't understand the latter part of the sentence: "Asking editors to read a source and reconstruct why a non-expert believes something is off-topic." [1] Can you explain it to me? Who is the non-expert you are referring to, Jimmy Wales?And isn't it the job of editors to accurately represent what actual experts say in reliable sources (RS), whether or not they themselves are experts? Have you actually read the article before closing? XMcan ( talk) 10:18, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
My edit to the talk page for human genital modification should not have been reverted because it was relevant to improving the article depending on how improvement is defined. The world majority is being logically inconsistent about this just like just like how the majority was logically inconsistent in Nazi Germany, the Antebellum South, the Jim Crowe South, etc. Pointing out an inconsistency in the majority position could be seen as potentially allowing an article to use phrasing that is more logically consistent, which could be viewed as an improvement.
In Short, KlayCax posted a questionable assertion about the absence of dysfunction with nothing to back it up. This assertion promotes the use of inconsistent terminology in the article. By challenging his assertion, I hoped to add points for future editors to consider when thinking about whether or not the article is using the most consistent terminology. I hope you will reconsider or accept some compromised form of my talk page edit, but I will respect your decision.
2600:6C58:6500:C06:8E1:4719:1F63:C590 ( talk) 10:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Robert McClenon ( talk) 16:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy Holidays | |
Hello, I want to be the first to wish you the very best during the holidays. We may not have been on the best terms in the past, but we are each working toward the same goal! Lightburst ( talk) 18:37, 15 December 2023 (UTC) |
Are personal Tweets and personal Substack writings in general deemed unreliable sources for Wikipedia purposes? If so, is there any particular reason for this? 172.56.185.241 ( talk) 04:31, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
those who pretend support Palestinian cause like Jackson Hinkle use misinformation to lure followers on Twitter and Sulaiman Ahmed who is Tate's lawyer whom everybody reblog his post, unaware he had connection with human trafficker Tate by -- Sunuraju ( talk) 08:19, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Sláinte! |
You probably don't remember, so let me remind you that I was one of those who !voted against you at your RfA. :) And I'm so glad to be discovering that I got that wrong. (Yes, children, it does happen, believe it or not.) Since then I've not seen anything to worry about at all, but not only that, I'm constantly impressed by how you handle the mop. Great job, I mean that.
So as a small peace offering on this winter's evening, may I tempt you with a cup o' kindness yet, my favourite uisge beatha. (I might have a drop myself, goes well with my humble pie...) PS: Not that it will be of much interest to you, but I also find your username intriguing, as a) I'm Finnish, and b) I genuinely think I must have been Scottish in my previous life. Uhh, and c) I quite like radishes. Cheers, -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 20:08, 17 December 2023 (UTC) |
Should account creation be blocked as likely sockpuppetry? Cf. Special:Diff/1190447488 ChaotıċEnby( t · c) 23:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Just wanted to be sure you knew Tryptofish was recovering from surgery when he made the less than ideal edit.
And, happy holidays. Don't eat too many radishes. O3000, Ret. ( talk) 01:17, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
@
Nableezy and
Andrevan: I just wanted to reach out and thank you for the agreement. I know you don't see eye to eye, but if there is going to be any chance at reasonable administration things need to calm down a bit. There are very few of us patrolling AE and ARBPIA articles, and if there's going to be any chance of admins actively watching and engaging on these topics
effectively then turning down the heat is necessary. The talk page of
2023 Israel-Hamas war is currently sitting at about one
tomats and 31 archive pages nearly the same size. And that's just one of the articles.
I didn't have a chance to look into the deeper part of the dispute, but if it comes up again I'd much prefer short to the point statements. Nableezy, I understand rhetorical flourishes like That is, and Im trying my best not to say lie here, not true. And it is very difficult to productively discuss content when somebody says something so blatantly untrue.
are a common way to communicate your point and frustration, but to me it's 30 more words I have to read that don't add anything. Andre, you wrote a lot that didn't have much to do with the issue at hand. I'm not trying to chastise either of you, or demand you respect my time. I'm begging you take pity on me and the other admins. You've both seen me and some others picking all the low hanging fruit, closing RFCs, issuing warnings, blocking disruptors, but when something complicated comes up it's hours of work. Please try and make it a bit easier. I'm really trying my best and spending piles of time on this, so anything you can do to lessen the burden would be appreciated.
I also know you two aren't the only editors involved, the only two going back and forth, you just happen to be the two primary editors involved in that last AE. Feel free to ping any other editors here that might benefit from reading my pitiful plea.
Long complex disputes that AE can't handle are how things end up back at arbcom, and no one (I hope) wants that. If you, or anyone else, has any ideas about how to settle the topic area I'd love to hear it as well. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 02:48, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
challenged text
text from source
simply for Admins to patrol the most contentious pages when they feel they have a little time to spareI've often felt this myself for the content areas I edit in (GENSEX and its intersection with AP2), but there's a problem. WP:INVOLVED. For better or for worse, the community has chosen to interpret INVOLVED very broadly. If an admin starts to do this sort of patrol, sooner or later they will cross the threshold where the regulars in that area will see them as too involved to take impartial actions. Typically by the time an admin is well versed enough in the content, and the behaviours of the regulars to start to identify problematic editors they are seen as too involved to do anything. Short of the community consensus changing on this point, I don't see this being an action that is sustainable. Sideswipe9th ( talk) 03:38, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
You blocked .131, .132, and .133 for one year. Now they have reappeared at .134. They appear to be Windscripe VPN nodes. You might consider blocking the range assigned 38.95.12.0/23 (at least according to WHOIS). — Archer ( t· c) 08:29, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
I'm sure you know this area better than I... in fact, is it surprising to you that it hasn't been designated a CT? Valereee ( talk) 16:12, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi! I apologize if you're busy, but I wanted to seek your input on a possible issue with an editor you blocked. I have commented on KlayCax's talk page after noticing unusual overlap between them and a very new editor. Another editor has expressed that they suspect an overlap (see this discussion). If you think there's enough evidence for an SPI, please let me know. Best, ~ Pbritti ( talk) 20:57, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
You might want to see this [3]. The IP address is threatening to use a different IP address to disrupt Wikipedia. Maybe is it a good idea to protect Talk:Stockton Rush for a few days or so? 🛧 Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 06:18, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
❄️ Happy holidays! ❄️
Hi ScottishFinnishRadish! I'd like to wish you a splendid solstice season as we wrap up the year. Here is an artwork, made individually for you, to celebrate. I hope your root vegetables flourish in the coming year :) Take care, and thanks for all you do to make Wikipedia better!Cheers,{{u| Sdkb}} talk 07:01, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you removed my membership from extended confirmed users on the basis that I was violating ECR. What are those violations? My understanding was that my original violations were due to editing content that was not locked but still considered ARBPIA. Now that I have reached the requirement for EC, why did you consider my newer edits as violations? Also if you could explain why you consider my edit history to be gaming ECR that would be very appreciated.
Thank you
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Log&logid=157067912 DMH43 ( talk) 15:01, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
I have revoked your extended-confirmed permissions for gaming 30/500, and returning immediately to ARBPIA, including restoring some of your original ECR violations, upon reaching 500 edits, as well as immediately ending all editing outside of ARBPIA.ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 15:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
I have appealed your revoking of my EC membership: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Appeal_of_the_removal_of_EC_membership_for_User:DMH43 DMH43 ( talk) 17:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
one :)
Also happy whatever, my spicy root friend. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 20:02, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, ScottishFinnishRadish! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year!
Chris Troutman (
talk)
23:06, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
{{subst:User:Shearonink/Holiday}}
to your friends' talk pages.(Sent: 02:18, 25 December 2023 (UTC)) Shearonink ( talk) 02:18, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! |
Hello ScottishFinnishRadish, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
🛧 Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 03:29, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
‑‑
Neveselbert (
talk ·
contribs ·
email) is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas!
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. |
‑‑ Neveselbert ( talk · contribs · email) 17:16, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
I significally toned down the message
[4] and withdrew what was unuseful and inappropriate.
I am engaging myself here to comment on content and only on content from now on, and not write comments on users in any case anymore.
I added valuable, balanced and measured content that have improved the articles
[5].
Iennes (
talk)
18:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar |
Instead of an appeal... I've got... characteristically... ANOTHER BARNSTAR FOR YOU INSTEAD. Do you know any other topic banned editors that sent a barnstar to their banning admin right after being banned? I bet you do not. I know this was a difficult decision and you're already getting flak for it, so let me not be one of those. I'll take this feedback under advisement and self-reflection. Andre 🚐 22:15, 26 December 2023 (UTC) |
WP:AE#Arbitration enforcement action appeal by Nableezy nableezy - 20:36, 27 December 2023 (UTC)