Hi! I noticed in your RfA that you might be interested in some things related to files, so I wanted to drop a line and encourage you to get involved in one of the areas I find to be a very nice diversion from the stressful administrative work on enwiki. OTRS is always in need of volunteers, especially to handle tickets related to image permissions. Let me know if you're open to the idea, and I'll provide more information. Administrators are especially invaluable as OTRS agents because they can view deleted files, and it's clear you're soon to be one. I've been engaging in a sort of shadowing/training program for new agents recently, so I'm happy to help walk you through an introduction to permissions tickets if you decide you're interested in that. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:46, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Wishing good health and happiness as we start the new year! -- Rosiestep ( talk) 20:20, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi there. I came to inform you that I undid your edit to this user's talk page. {{ admin help}} is for requesting help from a single admin. The problem you noticed in this user's editing is not one that can be decided by a single admin at this place. If they are a sock as DrKay suspects, WP:SPI is the right place. Otherwise, use WP:ANI or another noticeboard, not only because requests from {{ admin help}} are oftentimes not noticed for a long time and thus are not useful when immediate action is required. NB: Since I have no knowledge of the kind of edits you objected to, I did not take any action. Regards So Why 20:22, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
If you have some time at some stage to spend to update the Bike Auckland page, that would be appreciated. I did update the name, and add the new logo but am a bit hesitant to do yet more myself, for reason which I am sure you are aware. Not urgent but maybe if you get around to it some day... Ingolfson ( talk) 08:20, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Schwede66,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Donner60 (
talk) 09:28, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
-- Rubbish computer ( HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 12:30, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Schwede66. I've tagged a statement in the lead of Implosion of Radio Network House as the wording is challengable, and is not supported by sources as written. I've left a note on the talkpage. Regards SilkTork ✔Tea time 13:36, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Will do, thanks for the advice Racingmanager ( talk) 23:59, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the comment. The father of the house matter came from some research done a decade ago - but it may take a bit to resuscitate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glaw99 ( talk • contribs) 03:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
hi. may the force be with you!-- Wyatt2049 | ( talk) 18:02, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Ps, i soppourted you in the RFA. Hope you win. -- Wyatt2049 | ( talk) 18:21, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
It is not vandalism to remove a wikilink that does not exist. Suggest you create the story for this high school if it means so much to your article. Rogermx ( talk) 17:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Schwede66, I have closed your request for adminship as successful. Congratulations for both your new place on WP:RFX100 and for your near-unanimously-supported nomination! As always, the administrators' reading list is worth reading and the new admin help pages are most certainly available if you feel that you might require some practice with the tools in a safe environment prior to applying them elsewhere on the project. Good luck with your adminship! Acalamari 18:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Congradulations on adminship. Good luck being an admin Wyatt2049 | ( talk) 18:27, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
I thought it appropriate to say a few thank yous. First up, it was Anna Frodesiak's (misplaced) notice that prompted me to put my name forward at the optional RfA candidate poll. I got a good prodding from Ritchie333 (nothing wrong with that!), and Kudpung had some useful general advice for the eventual RfA process. They eventually became my nominators and they skilfully guided me through that process. But before anything else could happen, I thought it wise to tidy up a prior account with the Arbitration Committee, and quite a few of their members offered good advice. Once the RfA proper had started, the community was rather supportive of my application, and it's clear from some of the comments that quite a few editors did quite a bit of digging before commenting. Thank you everyone for investing the time to do some background research and then comment. Some of the comments I thoroughly enjoyed. Thank you to those members who put questions to me ( Lourdes, Leaky caldron, and Ottawahitech); that's an important part of the process. I wouldn't have minded a few more questions, though.
But now it's done, and it's up to me to live up to the expectations of the community. I shall give it my best shot. And when I fall short, please don't hesitate to let me know. Schwede 66 18:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
User:Dr_pda/prosesize.js
and I've already got that one, but it stopped working a couple of weeks back. Well, it does work, but only very intermittently. There are a few other things that have struggled in the last fortnight (e.g. Twinkle loads sporadically only; 'User:Anomie/linkclassifier.js'
is mostly down), and the 'Cite' link has fallen off my toolbar. Is there a server problem at the Wikimedia end, or is it just my account? If the latter, where would I go to ask for help?
Schwede
66 22:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)The Resilient Barnstar | |
Congratulations on the successful and well-deserved outcome to your RFA. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 18:37, 6 January 2017 (UTC) |
Congratulations on becoming Wikipedia's newest administrator! Rubbish computer ( HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC) |
Congratulations on your successful RFA! Allow me to impart the words of wisdom I received from the puppy after my RFA passed – almost ten long, sordid, why-didn't-I-find-a-better-hobby years ago: |
|
DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales, because if it did, it would be much, much better. All rights released under GFDL. |
Thanks, Katie - that's much appreciated. Yes, I do have an admin question. I prodded an article in July 2016 and it got deleted; the subject was close to the notability threshold but wasn't quite there yet. She subsequently received a lot of media attention and did rather well in the 2016 Auckland mayoral election, and I commented at some point that by then, she would meet notability criteria. The article has just been recreated. My query is: should I offer the previously deleted version as an article in draft space, so that the useful bits from half a year ago could be added to the new version? Schwede 66 22:35, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Congratulations. You'll do fine. Your first DYK promotion to Queue was done correctly. There is no mistake that cannot be corrected. Don't worry. Get the mop moving. Here's a couple of helpful links, if you didn't already have them:
Happy mopping. — Maile ( talk) 23:31, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
good sports
Thank you for quality articles such as Barrhill, New Zealand, for sports articles, for adding infoboxes, for serving as an admin, adding new energy to DYK, after you provided 200 articles yourself, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:38, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Congrats on becoming Wikipedia's newest admin!! EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 10:25, 7 January 2017 (UTC) |
A lot of new admins this year! If you fancy coffee over tea, then allow me to roll up my sleeves and serve up a pipin' cup of 'joe, made from only the finest coffee beans, ground with a hand-powered coffee grinder, filtered through a real French press, and served with the love only a true barista can provide... Okay, so I'm not actually a barista, but I do make my own coffee at home, and I hope you enjoy this cup as much as I enjoyed making it! — k6ka 🍁 ( Talk · Contributions) 18:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC) |
Schwede66, why did you put an orphan tag on the Electoral history of Arnold Nordmeyer article? Other articles link to it. I have undid that edit. J 947 05:38, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
I had never even noticed that! Good idea. Schwede 66 06:38, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | ||
For your contributions to the DYK project as an administrator. It's a role that's needed, and you've shown a willingness to learn and contribute to the project that shows you'll continue to be a boon. Congrats on the tools, you've clearly been using them well, and thanks for the work! Wugapodes [thɔk] [ˈkan.ˌʧɻɪbz] 23:55, 10 January 2017 (UTC) |
Thanks for the accolades. Much appreciated. Schwede 66 23:58, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I sent you an email on behalf of the Signpost. Thanks, Go Phightins ! 04:08, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
You should have a look at all the electoral history of NZ politicians articles as they don't use endashes. Also, how do you do an endash? J 947 18:37, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Schwede66, if the entry in the Credits section of the prep or queue does not have a "View nom subpage" link next to it when it's a DYKmake (DYKnoms do not have this link), then the subpage field is necessary and should be added, as you did earlier today. If the name of the article in the DYKmake exactly matches the Template page name of the nomination, then the subpage field isn't necessary; otherwise, it is. Multi-article hooks will need subpage parameters for all or all but one of the nominations, depending on how the template page is named. Let me know if you have any questions about this. BlueMoonset ( talk) 22:13, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Schwede66, can you please reassess Town of Dunedin by-election, 1859? I have just expanded it and nominated it for DYK. J 947 23:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I helped build Prep 6, and I was wondering why you made this swap? As it is, there were far more non-bios than bios in the set, and your swap also added a second nature hook. Yoninah ( talk) 12:36, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Oopsy... this gaffe arose out of using my Nelson paper stub as a template, then getting hauled away by the spouse before completion... Thanks for fixing. Bjenks ( talk) 01:49, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Schwede66, I was just moving the Prep 3 lead hook to Prep 6, but I see you've moved in the Prep 1 hook instead. Do be sure to shift around Prep 6, so you don't have two bios as the first two hooks. I hadn't saved any of my moves after removing the Prep 6 lead and getting it back into the special occasion section (which included exiling the koboni hook to Prep 4), and will leave everything to you so I don't interfere with anything you're doing. BlueMoonset ( talk) 08:33, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Please desist from using Wikipedia as a social media site, as you have done at Wikipedia talk:Did you know. A bit of humour is all very well but this discussion has been closed a few times. As an admin you should be setting an example of how to use project talk pages properly. The Rambling Man ( talk) 21:33, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
The Rambling Man, I’m a little bit puzzled why you feel you need to remind me of accountability for admins. With regards to the Extremely disappointed thread, I was the second editor to respond in a light-hearted manner to a light-hearted post. That response was my only post. I chose not to further involve myself in the discussion, and I’m unsure why you see reason to post on my talk page about that.
What I did observe, though, is that you closed the discussion several times: first
here, and then after being reverted by various [one] editors, you reverted
once,
twice, a
third, and even a
fourth time. I chose not to post about your violation of
WP:3RR on your talk page because I had left an early comment in that thread and thus did not think that I was uninvolved, and I thus considered that it was not my place to point this out to you. I consider me choosing not to post on your talk page about 3RR was lucky for you because there are certainly editors who have your talk page on their watchlist, just waiting for the opportunity to have a block imposed on you. But either way, choosing to not remind you of policy isn’t a threat.
In my book, you undertaking four reverts on the same thread is even worse than a simple 3RR violation, as I would perceive it as inflammatory behaviour. No doubt you will remember that ArbCom found in October 2016 that you had engaged in " inflammatory behavior". I expect from you that you do not engage in behaviour that ArbCom recorded as fact in its decision. Schwede 66 08:07, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
I see that you've been an administrator for a few days. Congratulations. I don't think we've met before. With the benefit of 9+ years of adminship behind me, might I make a couple of comments? (1) Wikipedia:Edit warring#Administrator guidance is worth reading. Saying to one person involved in a dispute that he's in breach of 3RR but you're only going to report the other party isn't impressive, since the EW noticeboard looks at the behaviour of all parties. (2) When the dispute died down hours and hours ago (after I stepped in), what is the point of reporting anyone? Blocks are meant to be preventative not punitive, after all. As the heading at WP:ANEW says "This page is for reporting active edit warriors" - note the word "active". Best wishes, Bencherlite Talk 20:46, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Comet Hale-Bopp.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 00:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Apoligies, I misread the article as "Dyer was several times Mayor of Milton and a member of the Otago City Council.[1][14] He stood in the Waihola electorate for the Otago Provincial Council in May 1863[14]". Which would have meant he belonged in both the general cat and the provincial cat. Mattlore ( talk) 00:57, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Serves me right for not being involved much in WP these days - I had no idea you were standing for admin, otherwise I'd have added my wholehearted support. As the saying goes "I though you already were one..." Congrats! Grutness... wha? 23:44, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Am sorry for being short-tempered about your reverting an edit a few weeks ago. Many of us Americans have been in a bad mood since last November. Thank you for being so courteous. Rogermx ( talk) 21:29, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Schwede66, we're over an hour overdue for a promotion to the main page, and while there are preps ready, we need one promoted to queue so it can be picked up by the bot. Any chance you could take this on? Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 01:22, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
We now have 812 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at
PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.
The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.
Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.
This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and
Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.
Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi Schwede66
I am sorry that I only just spotted your RFA, and regret that I didn't see it in time to add my enthusiastic support. We have interacted several times over the years, and you have always been a conscientious contributor and a thoughtfully courteous collaborator and consensus-builder. My idea of a model admin .. and I'm delighted to see from the overwhelming support at RFA that so many others see you in the same light.
So please accept my belated congratulations. I am sure that you will do great job as an admin.
And now that you have the mop, may I ask a favour of you?
The reason I spotted your RFA was that I was I doing some thinking in relation to a post by Marcocapelle at WP:ANRFC#Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion.23Discussions_awaiting_closure about the for more admins to close WP:CFDs. So I thought I'd look to see whether CFD featured in recent RFAs. (Answer: no <sad face>). But then I saw your name on the list of successful RFAs ...
Is there any way that you could be persuaded to help out a bit? Pleeeeeeeeeese! <grin>
Best wishes, -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 22:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello Schwede66, I totally disagree with the choice of the nickname "Jim" ;-) for the title of the English Page, and I gave my opinion on Talk:Jim Flynn (academic), best regards, -- Pierrette13 ( talk) 07:39, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Schwede66, could you please check this to see what's left for the nominator to do, and answer the questions there? Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 00:59, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Kia ora, Schwede66, and thank you for your comment on that article's talk page.
I guess an explanation goes like this:
What do you think about this?
Pete AU aka --
Shirt58 (
talk) 10:21, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello Schwede66, Thank you for your help and the link. I hope that I've done things properly ( Talk:Jim Flynn (academic)) . Kind regards, -- Pierrette13 ( talk) 17:33, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
On 21 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William John Dyer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that despite originally contesting the 1859 Town of Dunedin by-election, William John Dyer did not participate in the poll called afterwards? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William John Dyer. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, William John Dyer), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter ( talk) 00:03, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.
We now have 812 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.
Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
I would like you to monitor IP 27.252.143.154 and block him for vandalism. He has in the past few hours made disruptive edits to Parnell Railway Station, Westfield Railway Station, Newmarket Railway Station, New Zealand, Britomart Transport Centre, and List of Auckland railway stations.
This IP has been a huge problem since the middle of last year. He appears to have a major interest in Philippine articles, but from time to time he disrupts Auckland articles, particularly those about Auckland railway stations and shopping malls. His edits consist of bad-English additions and the addition of street addresses and post codes to malls. He also likes to add Start date templates to malls and sometimes changes them back and forth between Birth date and Start date.
Ajf773 (who also watches Auckland railway and mall articles) and I managed to get him blocked several months ago, but he simply changes IP address and starts again. It's time-consuming to go through the process of presenting a case with diffs at the Vandalism board, and it really needs an admin like yourself who can act quickly when his vandalism is spotted. I have his IP address on watch. When he changes it, his attacks quickly become obvious because I watch railway and mall articles. He is on about his fourth IP address since middle of last year. This guy is very persistent, never adds a summary, and comes back to articles where he has been reverted to do it again. Akld guy ( talk) 10:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
{{
auckland onehunga line}}
template for the first time. Continue scrolling ahead through the edits. Notice how he removes the same template multiple times under different IP addresses from August through to January, despite being told in edit summaries when being reverted that Onehunga Branch is part of Onehunga Line and therefore the template is correct. Yet you expect us to start from scratch and warn him??? This guy is a pest who needs stopping. Ajf773 and myself know his modus operandi. What does it take to get you to be pro-active?
Akld guy (
talk) 22:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)Akld guy No, you misunderstand. Post a copy-edited version of your latest edit above onto the talk page. Point out to the IP that this has all been mentioned before. That's all that needs doing. I want there to be evidence that a warning was given; in fact this is evidence that numerous warnings have been served. Schwede 66 22:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
See the editing history of Rainbow's End (theme park) since July 2016. Akld guy ( talk) 09:21, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Today's disruptive edit: here. He's not even competent in English. Akld guy ( talk) 09:03, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Not sure the article you were referencing, but this has been an issue in the past. Not trying to step on toes, but a bit of stronger counseling might be in order :) TonyBallioni ( talk) 18:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
re: Talk:Mussafia - on the same occasion I was recently advised not to add WPDAB to talk pages without actual talk; see here for detail and ref to guideline. Staszek Lem ( talk) 19:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Nobody has told me- That's the major problem with changes in policies and guidelines; and this is not the first time I was caught surprized. Staszek Lem ( talk) 20:14, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Block 86.135.10.83 immediately. This SPA has made vandalism edits at Patricia_Harmsworth,_Viscountess_Rothermere and there is every reason to think it is the same person who has been vandalizing the article for months under different IP addresses. Don't argue with me or ask me to issue warnings. There is no excuse for this behavior. Akld guy ( talk) 19:30, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2017).
Hi,
I'm not really sure what it was that enticed you to block this IP address in the first place, but they appear to be engaging in disruptive behavior once again. I came accross this edit filter showing them adding unsourced BLP material to an article. You may want to keep an eye on their edits. Thanks! 208.54.5.196 ( talk) 05:42, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
The article should probably be a double entry - the liberty (linked from a couple of other WP pages) and the Worshipful Company of Glaziers (who have a hall in the modern street of that name). There is slightly more information on the equivalent London Wiki page [1] so 'merge, link or otherwise develop' as you wish. Jackiespeel ( talk) 23:27, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your polite and helpful note on my talk page bringing to my attention the reverting of my edit to the Margaret Butler (sculptor) article. Unfortunately I am unable to recall the circumstances of my contribution. However I hasten to reassure you that any infringement of copyright was unintended and not done maliciously. I will endeavour not to repeat this error. Should you discover any other edits where I have inadvertently infringed copyright please do not hesitate to revert the same. I appreciate the work you do policing Wikipedia. Sincerely Ambrosia10 ( talk) 02:05, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Can you please do me a favour can you protect Fiji Prime Minster Frank Bainimarma wiki page. Thanks
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jvfmgnlllj ( talk) 01:06, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Huh? Schwede 66 05:53, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the Updates on New Zealand National Party leadership election, 1986. I just made a new page New Zealand National Party leadership election, 1997 if you can help that would be really Good.
I have recently uploaded six images to Commons:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dolphin%27s_Delight.png https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ExtravagaNZa.png https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fernlandia.png https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flat_White.png https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Crux_of_the_Matter.png https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Triple_Cross.png
Each of these images has been tagged with the Commons Categories 'Proposed national flags of New Zealand' and 'Proposed flags of New Zealand'.
When I am logged in and I visit the Commons pages for 'Proposed national flags of New Zealand' at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Proposed_national_flags_of_New_Zealand and at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Proposed_flags_of_New_Zealand, my images appear, but when I visit the pages after I have logged out, my images do not appear, unless I once again log in.
Can you resolve this issue for me, or explain how I may resolve it myself?
Kind regards,
NZ_Flag_Maven NZ Flag Maven ( talk) 02:50, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
The nuisance IP is back as 121.75.42.59. He laid low for a while, but is now back to editing Auckland mall and railway station articles. Some of his edits are worthwhile, others indicate a lack of familiarity and are just a nuisance. The biggest problem is that even when reverted with an edit summary explaining what he did wrong, he still comes back later and tries to change it again. That makes him a pest. Akld guy ( talk) 19:44, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello!
Please take a look and let me know if you can help with the following article Debbie Griffiths. Not sure 100% if it is up to standard or not. Maybe a Stub?
Thanks! -- TheDomain ( talk) 01:04, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello Schwede. No that is fine. I fully understand. Have been editing for awhile! Was too early. You are welcome to delete. Thank You for your assistance! -- TheDomain ( talk) 08:36, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Hey Schwede, just letting you know that when you edited Green Light (Lorde song) earlier in March, you changed all date formats to dmy, including in single chart templates that need to stay YYYY-MM-DD to work (Scotland and the UK). Ss 112 15:32, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed in your RfA that you might be interested in some things related to files, so I wanted to drop a line and encourage you to get involved in one of the areas I find to be a very nice diversion from the stressful administrative work on enwiki. OTRS is always in need of volunteers, especially to handle tickets related to image permissions. Let me know if you're open to the idea, and I'll provide more information. Administrators are especially invaluable as OTRS agents because they can view deleted files, and it's clear you're soon to be one. I've been engaging in a sort of shadowing/training program for new agents recently, so I'm happy to help walk you through an introduction to permissions tickets if you decide you're interested in that. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:46, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Wishing good health and happiness as we start the new year! -- Rosiestep ( talk) 20:20, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi there. I came to inform you that I undid your edit to this user's talk page. {{ admin help}} is for requesting help from a single admin. The problem you noticed in this user's editing is not one that can be decided by a single admin at this place. If they are a sock as DrKay suspects, WP:SPI is the right place. Otherwise, use WP:ANI or another noticeboard, not only because requests from {{ admin help}} are oftentimes not noticed for a long time and thus are not useful when immediate action is required. NB: Since I have no knowledge of the kind of edits you objected to, I did not take any action. Regards So Why 20:22, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
If you have some time at some stage to spend to update the Bike Auckland page, that would be appreciated. I did update the name, and add the new logo but am a bit hesitant to do yet more myself, for reason which I am sure you are aware. Not urgent but maybe if you get around to it some day... Ingolfson ( talk) 08:20, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Schwede66,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Donner60 (
talk) 09:28, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
-- Rubbish computer ( HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 12:30, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Schwede66. I've tagged a statement in the lead of Implosion of Radio Network House as the wording is challengable, and is not supported by sources as written. I've left a note on the talkpage. Regards SilkTork ✔Tea time 13:36, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Will do, thanks for the advice Racingmanager ( talk) 23:59, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the comment. The father of the house matter came from some research done a decade ago - but it may take a bit to resuscitate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glaw99 ( talk • contribs) 03:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
hi. may the force be with you!-- Wyatt2049 | ( talk) 18:02, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Ps, i soppourted you in the RFA. Hope you win. -- Wyatt2049 | ( talk) 18:21, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
It is not vandalism to remove a wikilink that does not exist. Suggest you create the story for this high school if it means so much to your article. Rogermx ( talk) 17:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Schwede66, I have closed your request for adminship as successful. Congratulations for both your new place on WP:RFX100 and for your near-unanimously-supported nomination! As always, the administrators' reading list is worth reading and the new admin help pages are most certainly available if you feel that you might require some practice with the tools in a safe environment prior to applying them elsewhere on the project. Good luck with your adminship! Acalamari 18:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Congradulations on adminship. Good luck being an admin Wyatt2049 | ( talk) 18:27, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
I thought it appropriate to say a few thank yous. First up, it was Anna Frodesiak's (misplaced) notice that prompted me to put my name forward at the optional RfA candidate poll. I got a good prodding from Ritchie333 (nothing wrong with that!), and Kudpung had some useful general advice for the eventual RfA process. They eventually became my nominators and they skilfully guided me through that process. But before anything else could happen, I thought it wise to tidy up a prior account with the Arbitration Committee, and quite a few of their members offered good advice. Once the RfA proper had started, the community was rather supportive of my application, and it's clear from some of the comments that quite a few editors did quite a bit of digging before commenting. Thank you everyone for investing the time to do some background research and then comment. Some of the comments I thoroughly enjoyed. Thank you to those members who put questions to me ( Lourdes, Leaky caldron, and Ottawahitech); that's an important part of the process. I wouldn't have minded a few more questions, though.
But now it's done, and it's up to me to live up to the expectations of the community. I shall give it my best shot. And when I fall short, please don't hesitate to let me know. Schwede 66 18:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
User:Dr_pda/prosesize.js
and I've already got that one, but it stopped working a couple of weeks back. Well, it does work, but only very intermittently. There are a few other things that have struggled in the last fortnight (e.g. Twinkle loads sporadically only; 'User:Anomie/linkclassifier.js'
is mostly down), and the 'Cite' link has fallen off my toolbar. Is there a server problem at the Wikimedia end, or is it just my account? If the latter, where would I go to ask for help?
Schwede
66 22:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)The Resilient Barnstar | |
Congratulations on the successful and well-deserved outcome to your RFA. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 18:37, 6 January 2017 (UTC) |
Congratulations on becoming Wikipedia's newest administrator! Rubbish computer ( HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC) |
Congratulations on your successful RFA! Allow me to impart the words of wisdom I received from the puppy after my RFA passed – almost ten long, sordid, why-didn't-I-find-a-better-hobby years ago: |
|
DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales, because if it did, it would be much, much better. All rights released under GFDL. |
Thanks, Katie - that's much appreciated. Yes, I do have an admin question. I prodded an article in July 2016 and it got deleted; the subject was close to the notability threshold but wasn't quite there yet. She subsequently received a lot of media attention and did rather well in the 2016 Auckland mayoral election, and I commented at some point that by then, she would meet notability criteria. The article has just been recreated. My query is: should I offer the previously deleted version as an article in draft space, so that the useful bits from half a year ago could be added to the new version? Schwede 66 22:35, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Congratulations. You'll do fine. Your first DYK promotion to Queue was done correctly. There is no mistake that cannot be corrected. Don't worry. Get the mop moving. Here's a couple of helpful links, if you didn't already have them:
Happy mopping. — Maile ( talk) 23:31, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
good sports
Thank you for quality articles such as Barrhill, New Zealand, for sports articles, for adding infoboxes, for serving as an admin, adding new energy to DYK, after you provided 200 articles yourself, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:38, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Congrats on becoming Wikipedia's newest admin!! EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 10:25, 7 January 2017 (UTC) |
A lot of new admins this year! If you fancy coffee over tea, then allow me to roll up my sleeves and serve up a pipin' cup of 'joe, made from only the finest coffee beans, ground with a hand-powered coffee grinder, filtered through a real French press, and served with the love only a true barista can provide... Okay, so I'm not actually a barista, but I do make my own coffee at home, and I hope you enjoy this cup as much as I enjoyed making it! — k6ka 🍁 ( Talk · Contributions) 18:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC) |
Schwede66, why did you put an orphan tag on the Electoral history of Arnold Nordmeyer article? Other articles link to it. I have undid that edit. J 947 05:38, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
I had never even noticed that! Good idea. Schwede 66 06:38, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | ||
For your contributions to the DYK project as an administrator. It's a role that's needed, and you've shown a willingness to learn and contribute to the project that shows you'll continue to be a boon. Congrats on the tools, you've clearly been using them well, and thanks for the work! Wugapodes [thɔk] [ˈkan.ˌʧɻɪbz] 23:55, 10 January 2017 (UTC) |
Thanks for the accolades. Much appreciated. Schwede 66 23:58, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I sent you an email on behalf of the Signpost. Thanks, Go Phightins ! 04:08, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
You should have a look at all the electoral history of NZ politicians articles as they don't use endashes. Also, how do you do an endash? J 947 18:37, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Schwede66, if the entry in the Credits section of the prep or queue does not have a "View nom subpage" link next to it when it's a DYKmake (DYKnoms do not have this link), then the subpage field is necessary and should be added, as you did earlier today. If the name of the article in the DYKmake exactly matches the Template page name of the nomination, then the subpage field isn't necessary; otherwise, it is. Multi-article hooks will need subpage parameters for all or all but one of the nominations, depending on how the template page is named. Let me know if you have any questions about this. BlueMoonset ( talk) 22:13, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Schwede66, can you please reassess Town of Dunedin by-election, 1859? I have just expanded it and nominated it for DYK. J 947 23:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I helped build Prep 6, and I was wondering why you made this swap? As it is, there were far more non-bios than bios in the set, and your swap also added a second nature hook. Yoninah ( talk) 12:36, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Oopsy... this gaffe arose out of using my Nelson paper stub as a template, then getting hauled away by the spouse before completion... Thanks for fixing. Bjenks ( talk) 01:49, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Schwede66, I was just moving the Prep 3 lead hook to Prep 6, but I see you've moved in the Prep 1 hook instead. Do be sure to shift around Prep 6, so you don't have two bios as the first two hooks. I hadn't saved any of my moves after removing the Prep 6 lead and getting it back into the special occasion section (which included exiling the koboni hook to Prep 4), and will leave everything to you so I don't interfere with anything you're doing. BlueMoonset ( talk) 08:33, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Please desist from using Wikipedia as a social media site, as you have done at Wikipedia talk:Did you know. A bit of humour is all very well but this discussion has been closed a few times. As an admin you should be setting an example of how to use project talk pages properly. The Rambling Man ( talk) 21:33, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
The Rambling Man, I’m a little bit puzzled why you feel you need to remind me of accountability for admins. With regards to the Extremely disappointed thread, I was the second editor to respond in a light-hearted manner to a light-hearted post. That response was my only post. I chose not to further involve myself in the discussion, and I’m unsure why you see reason to post on my talk page about that.
What I did observe, though, is that you closed the discussion several times: first
here, and then after being reverted by various [one] editors, you reverted
once,
twice, a
third, and even a
fourth time. I chose not to post about your violation of
WP:3RR on your talk page because I had left an early comment in that thread and thus did not think that I was uninvolved, and I thus considered that it was not my place to point this out to you. I consider me choosing not to post on your talk page about 3RR was lucky for you because there are certainly editors who have your talk page on their watchlist, just waiting for the opportunity to have a block imposed on you. But either way, choosing to not remind you of policy isn’t a threat.
In my book, you undertaking four reverts on the same thread is even worse than a simple 3RR violation, as I would perceive it as inflammatory behaviour. No doubt you will remember that ArbCom found in October 2016 that you had engaged in " inflammatory behavior". I expect from you that you do not engage in behaviour that ArbCom recorded as fact in its decision. Schwede 66 08:07, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
I see that you've been an administrator for a few days. Congratulations. I don't think we've met before. With the benefit of 9+ years of adminship behind me, might I make a couple of comments? (1) Wikipedia:Edit warring#Administrator guidance is worth reading. Saying to one person involved in a dispute that he's in breach of 3RR but you're only going to report the other party isn't impressive, since the EW noticeboard looks at the behaviour of all parties. (2) When the dispute died down hours and hours ago (after I stepped in), what is the point of reporting anyone? Blocks are meant to be preventative not punitive, after all. As the heading at WP:ANEW says "This page is for reporting active edit warriors" - note the word "active". Best wishes, Bencherlite Talk 20:46, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Comet Hale-Bopp.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 00:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Apoligies, I misread the article as "Dyer was several times Mayor of Milton and a member of the Otago City Council.[1][14] He stood in the Waihola electorate for the Otago Provincial Council in May 1863[14]". Which would have meant he belonged in both the general cat and the provincial cat. Mattlore ( talk) 00:57, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Serves me right for not being involved much in WP these days - I had no idea you were standing for admin, otherwise I'd have added my wholehearted support. As the saying goes "I though you already were one..." Congrats! Grutness... wha? 23:44, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Am sorry for being short-tempered about your reverting an edit a few weeks ago. Many of us Americans have been in a bad mood since last November. Thank you for being so courteous. Rogermx ( talk) 21:29, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Schwede66, we're over an hour overdue for a promotion to the main page, and while there are preps ready, we need one promoted to queue so it can be picked up by the bot. Any chance you could take this on? Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 01:22, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
We now have 812 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at
PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.
The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.
Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.
This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and
Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.
Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi Schwede66
I am sorry that I only just spotted your RFA, and regret that I didn't see it in time to add my enthusiastic support. We have interacted several times over the years, and you have always been a conscientious contributor and a thoughtfully courteous collaborator and consensus-builder. My idea of a model admin .. and I'm delighted to see from the overwhelming support at RFA that so many others see you in the same light.
So please accept my belated congratulations. I am sure that you will do great job as an admin.
And now that you have the mop, may I ask a favour of you?
The reason I spotted your RFA was that I was I doing some thinking in relation to a post by Marcocapelle at WP:ANRFC#Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion.23Discussions_awaiting_closure about the for more admins to close WP:CFDs. So I thought I'd look to see whether CFD featured in recent RFAs. (Answer: no <sad face>). But then I saw your name on the list of successful RFAs ...
Is there any way that you could be persuaded to help out a bit? Pleeeeeeeeeese! <grin>
Best wishes, -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 22:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello Schwede66, I totally disagree with the choice of the nickname "Jim" ;-) for the title of the English Page, and I gave my opinion on Talk:Jim Flynn (academic), best regards, -- Pierrette13 ( talk) 07:39, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Schwede66, could you please check this to see what's left for the nominator to do, and answer the questions there? Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 00:59, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Kia ora, Schwede66, and thank you for your comment on that article's talk page.
I guess an explanation goes like this:
What do you think about this?
Pete AU aka --
Shirt58 (
talk) 10:21, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello Schwede66, Thank you for your help and the link. I hope that I've done things properly ( Talk:Jim Flynn (academic)) . Kind regards, -- Pierrette13 ( talk) 17:33, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
On 21 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William John Dyer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that despite originally contesting the 1859 Town of Dunedin by-election, William John Dyer did not participate in the poll called afterwards? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William John Dyer. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, William John Dyer), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter ( talk) 00:03, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.
We now have 812 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.
Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
I would like you to monitor IP 27.252.143.154 and block him for vandalism. He has in the past few hours made disruptive edits to Parnell Railway Station, Westfield Railway Station, Newmarket Railway Station, New Zealand, Britomart Transport Centre, and List of Auckland railway stations.
This IP has been a huge problem since the middle of last year. He appears to have a major interest in Philippine articles, but from time to time he disrupts Auckland articles, particularly those about Auckland railway stations and shopping malls. His edits consist of bad-English additions and the addition of street addresses and post codes to malls. He also likes to add Start date templates to malls and sometimes changes them back and forth between Birth date and Start date.
Ajf773 (who also watches Auckland railway and mall articles) and I managed to get him blocked several months ago, but he simply changes IP address and starts again. It's time-consuming to go through the process of presenting a case with diffs at the Vandalism board, and it really needs an admin like yourself who can act quickly when his vandalism is spotted. I have his IP address on watch. When he changes it, his attacks quickly become obvious because I watch railway and mall articles. He is on about his fourth IP address since middle of last year. This guy is very persistent, never adds a summary, and comes back to articles where he has been reverted to do it again. Akld guy ( talk) 10:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
{{
auckland onehunga line}}
template for the first time. Continue scrolling ahead through the edits. Notice how he removes the same template multiple times under different IP addresses from August through to January, despite being told in edit summaries when being reverted that Onehunga Branch is part of Onehunga Line and therefore the template is correct. Yet you expect us to start from scratch and warn him??? This guy is a pest who needs stopping. Ajf773 and myself know his modus operandi. What does it take to get you to be pro-active?
Akld guy (
talk) 22:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)Akld guy No, you misunderstand. Post a copy-edited version of your latest edit above onto the talk page. Point out to the IP that this has all been mentioned before. That's all that needs doing. I want there to be evidence that a warning was given; in fact this is evidence that numerous warnings have been served. Schwede 66 22:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
See the editing history of Rainbow's End (theme park) since July 2016. Akld guy ( talk) 09:21, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Today's disruptive edit: here. He's not even competent in English. Akld guy ( talk) 09:03, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Not sure the article you were referencing, but this has been an issue in the past. Not trying to step on toes, but a bit of stronger counseling might be in order :) TonyBallioni ( talk) 18:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
re: Talk:Mussafia - on the same occasion I was recently advised not to add WPDAB to talk pages without actual talk; see here for detail and ref to guideline. Staszek Lem ( talk) 19:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Nobody has told me- That's the major problem with changes in policies and guidelines; and this is not the first time I was caught surprized. Staszek Lem ( talk) 20:14, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Block 86.135.10.83 immediately. This SPA has made vandalism edits at Patricia_Harmsworth,_Viscountess_Rothermere and there is every reason to think it is the same person who has been vandalizing the article for months under different IP addresses. Don't argue with me or ask me to issue warnings. There is no excuse for this behavior. Akld guy ( talk) 19:30, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2017).
Hi,
I'm not really sure what it was that enticed you to block this IP address in the first place, but they appear to be engaging in disruptive behavior once again. I came accross this edit filter showing them adding unsourced BLP material to an article. You may want to keep an eye on their edits. Thanks! 208.54.5.196 ( talk) 05:42, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
The article should probably be a double entry - the liberty (linked from a couple of other WP pages) and the Worshipful Company of Glaziers (who have a hall in the modern street of that name). There is slightly more information on the equivalent London Wiki page [1] so 'merge, link or otherwise develop' as you wish. Jackiespeel ( talk) 23:27, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your polite and helpful note on my talk page bringing to my attention the reverting of my edit to the Margaret Butler (sculptor) article. Unfortunately I am unable to recall the circumstances of my contribution. However I hasten to reassure you that any infringement of copyright was unintended and not done maliciously. I will endeavour not to repeat this error. Should you discover any other edits where I have inadvertently infringed copyright please do not hesitate to revert the same. I appreciate the work you do policing Wikipedia. Sincerely Ambrosia10 ( talk) 02:05, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Can you please do me a favour can you protect Fiji Prime Minster Frank Bainimarma wiki page. Thanks
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jvfmgnlllj ( talk) 01:06, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Huh? Schwede 66 05:53, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the Updates on New Zealand National Party leadership election, 1986. I just made a new page New Zealand National Party leadership election, 1997 if you can help that would be really Good.
I have recently uploaded six images to Commons:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dolphin%27s_Delight.png https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ExtravagaNZa.png https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fernlandia.png https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flat_White.png https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Crux_of_the_Matter.png https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Triple_Cross.png
Each of these images has been tagged with the Commons Categories 'Proposed national flags of New Zealand' and 'Proposed flags of New Zealand'.
When I am logged in and I visit the Commons pages for 'Proposed national flags of New Zealand' at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Proposed_national_flags_of_New_Zealand and at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Proposed_flags_of_New_Zealand, my images appear, but when I visit the pages after I have logged out, my images do not appear, unless I once again log in.
Can you resolve this issue for me, or explain how I may resolve it myself?
Kind regards,
NZ_Flag_Maven NZ Flag Maven ( talk) 02:50, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
The nuisance IP is back as 121.75.42.59. He laid low for a while, but is now back to editing Auckland mall and railway station articles. Some of his edits are worthwhile, others indicate a lack of familiarity and are just a nuisance. The biggest problem is that even when reverted with an edit summary explaining what he did wrong, he still comes back later and tries to change it again. That makes him a pest. Akld guy ( talk) 19:44, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello!
Please take a look and let me know if you can help with the following article Debbie Griffiths. Not sure 100% if it is up to standard or not. Maybe a Stub?
Thanks! -- TheDomain ( talk) 01:04, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello Schwede. No that is fine. I fully understand. Have been editing for awhile! Was too early. You are welcome to delete. Thank You for your assistance! -- TheDomain ( talk) 08:36, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Hey Schwede, just letting you know that when you edited Green Light (Lorde song) earlier in March, you changed all date formats to dmy, including in single chart templates that need to stay YYYY-MM-DD to work (Scotland and the UK). Ss 112 15:32, 31 March 2017 (UTC)