This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Good morning Sandstein. This article s6 (init) is as a draft, I think it should be published because it is relevant to the world of operating systems. Thank you very much. -- Rstmnq1000 ( talk) 02:48, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
I disagree with your recent speedy close of Wikipedia:Deletion_review#List_of_hip_hop_albums_considered_to_be_influential. The drive-by move of the article, changing its title, clearly influenced arguments. It is akin to nominating a vandalized article for deletion and its being deleted on those grounds. If it is not, perhaps you have the time to explain why it is not. 78.18.237.81 ( talk) 14:20, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
I would also be interested, if you have the time, in your personal opinion of why the article it is based on, List of prominent operas, has been through several rounds of peer review without even being nominated, much less deleted. 78.18.237.81 ( talk) 14:24, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Why did you delete the page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RandomEditor17 ( talk • contribs) 05:57, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
That a redirect is a reasonable alternative to deletion is not contested.
Doesn't seem quite right to me. My comment speaks for itself (see the part labeled B2), and
BilledMammal was going in a similar direction. Usually a redirect would be fine, but here it's ambiguous... Cheers,
RandomCanadian (
talk /
contribs)
16:31, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi Sandstein! I was just reviewing WP:Contents and noticed there's a new redlink from Outline of Roget's Thesaurus, which was deleted today from the discussion you closed. It appears no one there noticed that it was linked from the contents page; I'm not sure if that would've changed anything about the result, but just wanted to flag it for you/ Rublov. {{u| Sdkb}} talk 04:20, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Appreciations for the closure. Hit an edit-conflict when saving… so copied the text over to Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Arnold van den Bergh (notary). Hopefully pretty in-line with the finding of the closure. — Sladen ( talk) 10:37, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
In the context of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain Flag, will a bot re-add it to delsort lists like fictional elements, etc. (where the discussion was previously listed, and it still contains, currently also, notes about being listed in those groupings) or do we need to do it manually? I could do it in 30s with the script, but I don't want to mess things up. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:43, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.
Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of A. Lawrey. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. I have also nominated Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E. J. Jones (rugby union) for deletion review. NemesisAT ( talk) 19:30, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I feel your delete close at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. Lawrey did not consider the opinions of the keep voters, who disagree with your interpretation of the WP:NSPORTS guideline. Your close also did not consider the suggestion for a redirect as an WP:ATD. Four keeps to one delete is too significant a majority to dismiss, in my opinion. The result should either have been a keep or a no consensus. Would you reconsider your close? Same goes for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E. J. Jones (rugby union) where there was a split in opinions. NemesisAT ( talk) 09:51, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
As per the discussion at User talk:Sandstein/Archives/2022/February#:Sandstein/Archives/2022/February#Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. Albert I've asked for the restoration of the edit history at WP:REFUND#A. Albert. Nfitz ( talk) 19:02, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi. I find the decision you made at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laodice (wife of Mithridates II of Commagene) to be rather odd. It was demonstrated (and not disputed by anyone) in the discussion that this Laodice was not the wife of Mithridates II of Commagene and that the name of the wife (if any) of Mithridates II of Commagene is not known. Any merger would therefore be wrong. Surtsicna ( talk) 13:07, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Hey there, just wanted to see if you could watchlist the Brian Evans AFD. You may have put on your list already but [ [1]] should probably be addressed. Unbroken Chain ( talk) 16:52, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Greetings. You closed the recent AfD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Nations in popular culture (2nd nomination), and I was wondering if you could take a look at the former article and see if this new one bears any resemblance. I can't imagine that it does, since this is a very well written piece, but I didn't want to simply mark it "reviewed" if I was missing something. Thanks. Onel5969 TT me 15:25, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I am a Content Moderator from the Warbrokers fandom wiki, I recently noticed that the Warbrokers Wikipedia page was deleted, may I ask why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:31B0:1AB0:DC13:2BCD:1CF8:4A5B ( talk) 22:19, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi Sandstein, in the deletion discussion, since the page had already been "moved" (transwikied) to https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Topics_in_Abstract_Algebra/Linear_algebra, I had suggested to replace the page content by a Wikipedia:soft redirect (specifically {{ Template:Wikibooks redirect}}). I'd like to understand why the page was actually deleted instead. Could you explain, please? -- RainerBlome ( talk) 23:54, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi. I don't speak German and apparently the speedy deletion template doesn't work on German Wikipedia. So I was wondering if you could nominate https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/A._Sternberg for speedy deletion for me since it doesn't link to anything. Thanks. -- Adamant1 ( talk) 11:51, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Good morning Sandstein. This article s6 (init) is as a draft, I think it should be published because it is relevant to the world of operating systems. Thank you very much. -- Rstmnq1000 ( talk) 02:48, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
I disagree with your recent speedy close of Wikipedia:Deletion_review#List_of_hip_hop_albums_considered_to_be_influential. The drive-by move of the article, changing its title, clearly influenced arguments. It is akin to nominating a vandalized article for deletion and its being deleted on those grounds. If it is not, perhaps you have the time to explain why it is not. 78.18.237.81 ( talk) 14:20, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
I would also be interested, if you have the time, in your personal opinion of why the article it is based on, List of prominent operas, has been through several rounds of peer review without even being nominated, much less deleted. 78.18.237.81 ( talk) 14:24, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Why did you delete the page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RandomEditor17 ( talk • contribs) 05:57, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
That a redirect is a reasonable alternative to deletion is not contested.
Doesn't seem quite right to me. My comment speaks for itself (see the part labeled B2), and
BilledMammal was going in a similar direction. Usually a redirect would be fine, but here it's ambiguous... Cheers,
RandomCanadian (
talk /
contribs)
16:31, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi Sandstein! I was just reviewing WP:Contents and noticed there's a new redlink from Outline of Roget's Thesaurus, which was deleted today from the discussion you closed. It appears no one there noticed that it was linked from the contents page; I'm not sure if that would've changed anything about the result, but just wanted to flag it for you/ Rublov. {{u| Sdkb}} talk 04:20, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Appreciations for the closure. Hit an edit-conflict when saving… so copied the text over to Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Arnold van den Bergh (notary). Hopefully pretty in-line with the finding of the closure. — Sladen ( talk) 10:37, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
In the context of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain Flag, will a bot re-add it to delsort lists like fictional elements, etc. (where the discussion was previously listed, and it still contains, currently also, notes about being listed in those groupings) or do we need to do it manually? I could do it in 30s with the script, but I don't want to mess things up. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:43, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.
Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of A. Lawrey. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. I have also nominated Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E. J. Jones (rugby union) for deletion review. NemesisAT ( talk) 19:30, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I feel your delete close at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. Lawrey did not consider the opinions of the keep voters, who disagree with your interpretation of the WP:NSPORTS guideline. Your close also did not consider the suggestion for a redirect as an WP:ATD. Four keeps to one delete is too significant a majority to dismiss, in my opinion. The result should either have been a keep or a no consensus. Would you reconsider your close? Same goes for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E. J. Jones (rugby union) where there was a split in opinions. NemesisAT ( talk) 09:51, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
As per the discussion at User talk:Sandstein/Archives/2022/February#:Sandstein/Archives/2022/February#Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. Albert I've asked for the restoration of the edit history at WP:REFUND#A. Albert. Nfitz ( talk) 19:02, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi. I find the decision you made at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laodice (wife of Mithridates II of Commagene) to be rather odd. It was demonstrated (and not disputed by anyone) in the discussion that this Laodice was not the wife of Mithridates II of Commagene and that the name of the wife (if any) of Mithridates II of Commagene is not known. Any merger would therefore be wrong. Surtsicna ( talk) 13:07, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Hey there, just wanted to see if you could watchlist the Brian Evans AFD. You may have put on your list already but [ [1]] should probably be addressed. Unbroken Chain ( talk) 16:52, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Greetings. You closed the recent AfD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Nations in popular culture (2nd nomination), and I was wondering if you could take a look at the former article and see if this new one bears any resemblance. I can't imagine that it does, since this is a very well written piece, but I didn't want to simply mark it "reviewed" if I was missing something. Thanks. Onel5969 TT me 15:25, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I am a Content Moderator from the Warbrokers fandom wiki, I recently noticed that the Warbrokers Wikipedia page was deleted, may I ask why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:31B0:1AB0:DC13:2BCD:1CF8:4A5B ( talk) 22:19, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi Sandstein, in the deletion discussion, since the page had already been "moved" (transwikied) to https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Topics_in_Abstract_Algebra/Linear_algebra, I had suggested to replace the page content by a Wikipedia:soft redirect (specifically {{ Template:Wikibooks redirect}}). I'd like to understand why the page was actually deleted instead. Could you explain, please? -- RainerBlome ( talk) 23:54, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi. I don't speak German and apparently the speedy deletion template doesn't work on German Wikipedia. So I was wondering if you could nominate https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/A._Sternberg for speedy deletion for me since it doesn't link to anything. Thanks. -- Adamant1 ( talk) 11:51, 24 February 2022 (UTC)