This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Please do not bite the newcomers Understand that newcomers are both necessary for and valuable to the community. By helping newcomers, we can increase the range of knowledge, perspectives, and ideas on Wikipedia, thereby preserving its neutrality and integrity as a resource and ultimately increasing its value. In fact, it has been found that newcomers are responsible for adding the majority of substantive edits, i.e. lasting content; while insiders and administrators are responsible for a large number of total edits, these often involve tweaking, reverting, and rearranging content. Remember, our motto and our invitation to the newcomer is be bold. We have a set of rules, standards, and traditions, but they must not be applied in such a way as to thwart the efforts of newcomers who take that invitation at face value. A newcomer brings a wealth of ideas, creativity and experience from other areas that, current rules and standards aside, have the potential to better our community and Wikipedia as a whole. It may be that the rules and standards need revising or expanding; perhaps what the newcomer is doing "wrong" may ultimately improve Wikipedia. Observe for a while and, if necessary, ask what the newcomer is trying to achieve before concluding that their efforts are wanting or that they are simply "wrong". If a newcomer seems to have made a small mistake, e.g. forgot to put a book title in italics, correct it yourself but do not slam the newcomer. A gentle note on their user page explaining the Wikipedia standard and how to achieve it in the future may prove helpful, as they may be unfamiliar with the norm or merely how to achieve it. Remember, this is a place where anyone may edit and therefore it is each person's responsibility to edit and complement, rather than to criticize or supervise others. If you use bad manners or curse at newcomers, they may decide not to contribute again.
[Summary] The customer is always right. [Harry Gordon Selfridge, 1858-1947]
[An ancient Chinese proverb] Don't bite the hand that feeds
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.1.219.200 ( talk) 15:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
I wholeheartedly agree with this, and it is particularly true for articles concerning countries where English is not widely spoken, and developing countries. Natives of these countries have as much right to be editing Wikipedia as we do, and yet they have more hurdles to jump than we who have English as our mother tongue and can more easily learn the correct protocols for editing Wikipedia and the tricks of the trade. Thank you for sharing this, it is a valuable reminder. Amirah talk 22:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Courtesy Link: There is a recreation of an article previously merged Talk:Mya Thwe Thwe Khaing with your vote -> Death of Mya Thwe Thwe Khine. Feel free to participate in the deletion discussion. CommanderWaterford ( talk) 18:03, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 42, January – February 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:28, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Dear editors, developers and friends:
Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.
Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.
Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Robertsky, I hope you are well. There is a discussion at Wikimedia Commons about the position to take on images from Singapore here: c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gan Siow Huang 1.jpg. It is a discussion with significant implications for Singapore-related photos, so I thought it might be of interest to you, and I think your view would benefit the discussion. Kohlrabi Pickle ( talk) 03:36, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, apparently radio stations by SPH have been redirected because of lack of independent and verifiable content. Is there any idea how to resolve this so that at least the radio stations can be there? Thanks. TheGreatSG'rean ( talk) 17:17, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Robertsky. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at
WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 20:55, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
I've seen that you've done great work with reverting the nonstop amount of birthdate and unsourced height additions added by IPs in Malaysia, as well as finding refs for the correct dates. I've reverted a lot of it myself, but I'd like to ask for your assistance with Qin Lan, as if you look in the history, many IPs have changed her birthdate to several different conflicting years, and I wouldn't know which one is correct. I don't have the expertise to deal with this, and figured you would. Thanks. Waxworker ( talk) 15:05, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Ouch, I'm so sorry, I should do research! Cheers, Hockeycatcat ( talk) 09:28, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Well, congratulations on your graduation! Someone will probably find a source soon since the rename was recent. Cheers, Hockeycatcat ( talk) 09:41, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
That's good, hopefully there won't be any more confusion from now on! Cheers, Hockeycatcat ( talk) 09:44, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Good idea! Hockeycatcat ( talk) 10:07, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Total Defence Logo 2020.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:59, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Robertsky, I noticed that you removed links to further reading that I added in entries related to COVID-19 apps. While I agree with your reasoning in some cases (e.g. the links might be too country-specific for the "contact tracing" entry), I do believe that they are very relevant to other entries such as "COVID-19 apps" and "Corona-Warn-App". I also don't think these links violate the guidelines on external links. Could you please explain why do you feel otherwise, so I can better understand how to add/edit such sections? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.181.78.252 ( talk) 9:58, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
See point 6 under WP:ELNO. – robertsky ( talk) 10:15, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
And WP:ELPOV – robertsky ( talk) 10:19, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
The article City Developments Limited you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:City Developments Limited for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Willbb234 -- Willbb234 ( talk) 15:21, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 43, March – April 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:12, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Am I missing something with the English version of Culture of Singapore? Why was there stuff being removed constantly, because in other languages it seems like there's no problem. It seems like the German version hasn't existed yet so I am planning on creating one. I am willing to translate to my native language, but which version? One has much less information than the other. It would seem weird if one language has more information than the other, especially since English is considered the language that most people understands. Thanks. BrandenburgWatch ( talk) 18:15, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Re: [2], Libera.chat is actually an internal link. :-P
In other news, see also: meta:Wikimedia Forum#Freenode_(IRC)
-- Kim Bruning ( talk) 16:12, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello Robertsky, would you be able to help me remove 'MP' from all our politicians' pages with AWB when you have the time? 'MP' is not a postnominal and merely a position, and I wish to standardise the pages like those belonging to that of British politicians, who don't have 'MP' as part of their name. Thank you. Seloloving ( talk) 00:39, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
They're all available under this link. At the top of the page, they're licensed under the creative commons 4.0 license (listed as a white bar at the top of the page). https://www.ycod.org/design-files
The links to news sites are needed for Wikipedia notability. Evanroden1 ( talk) 09:43, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
I noticed you 'reviewed' a page I have contributed to/suggested - just wondering if you have any suggestions? Thank you @Robertsky ! Ajcwritwiki ( talk) 14:59, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:2021 Singaporean television seasons indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 14:26, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Pingat Jasa Gemilang (Wikipedia) | |
For your tireless and longstanding efforts to improve the quality of Singapore-related Wikipedia articles, for your contribution to building a Singaporean Wikipedia community, I award you the Pingat Jasa Gemilang (Wikipedia) for May 2021. Thank you for all that you do! Kohlrabi Pickle ( talk) 03:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC) |
First you tell me what souce you used to write this some incorrect information about the great king Sambhaji. There are very few nonsence books/writers who at one side doing defamation of Sambhaji while stating about his contribution and bravery on other side. How much this is logical you think. You just took the summery of these books and content of some distorted writers right. So there huge number of books who describes the real sambhaji which is proof of this that The true story is Sambhaji was an ideal king who didn't have any bad addiction and was a symbol for bravery and patriotism which he shown in his sacrifice. He was a great king that's how he managed to defeat Aurangzeb Right? How a king who is badly addicted can manage this? And why Shehenshah of Hindustan Aurangzeb can be so desperate to capture like such King which is coloured by some distorted writer? Use simple logic. Sambhaji is a god for many people so stop his defamation. Swarajya History.. ( talk) 04:04, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
It looks as Some unrealistic events and Defamation about sambhaji made on Wikipedia is based on the articles of some distorted writers. Is that before publishing it on Wikipedia Google don't validate the articles? Because in your links there are many references which you have given tells the real story about Sambhaji. I am from Sambhaji's Land and know the true facts however I can provide you the references from government site but those are in Marathi language, will that work? Swarajya History.. ( talk) 10:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
I have moved the existing redirect out of the way, so you are free to accept
Draft:Lao Khao. --
Ahecht (
TALK
PAGE) 17:13, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:2020s Singaporean television seasons indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:47, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi! I am bit confused to what just happened with the article. I was waiting for it to be moved to a separate article, but it just became a redirect? May I know the reason why? I have edited it significantly and I believe that publication of the article is warranted. Thank you! Pampi1010 ( talk) 17:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
Thank you for checking out the Thomasian Welcome Walk page Pampi1010 ( talk) 10:34, 17 June 2021 (UTC) |
Thanks for your speedy review of my first attempt at Draft:University of Toronto School of the Environment. I've expanded the article a little, and added a number of citations from secondary sources. I'm relatively new to this - I've made lots of small edits in Wikipedia before, but this is my first new article, so if I've messed up, please let me know! GunterGruen ( talk) 21:37, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello – robertsky The draft I moved ie Enobong Akoabio was a mistake I was trying to move a draft from draftspace not my sandbox I am infact trying to delete the article. I can't seem to find the move draft from draftspace to mainspace or for review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zend2020 ( talk • contribs)
Hello – robertsky I actually done that already i.e blanked the page before your message came in how could i move a draft for review or to mainspace?-- Zend2020 ( talk) 22:11, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
– robertsky Wow any idea how i can reverse this mess — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zend2020 ( talk • contribs)
- robertskyMany Thanks-- Zend2020 ( talk) 06:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi – robertsky,
Thanks for your feedback. Can you suggest changes to make this article more neutral? /info/en/?search=Dealstreetasia Sagekreyol ( talk) 00:55, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, this submission has already gone through three revisions, and your objection has not been made by anyone before. Could you please specify which statement you consider inappropriate and which sources - they are all neutral third party sources - are not correct? Thank you for an answer as precise as possible. MarcAnder79 (talk) 13:37, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
MarcAnder79 ( talk) 16:52, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your hints and comments, I think the noted passages are now all provided with reliable sources. Regarding "Exhibitions, Screenings, Installations": these are an indispensable part of a lexical artist article (compare other artist articles, for example on Sebastiao Salgado) that reflects the notability of the artist. An artist exhibition is not to be confused with a fair exhibition. It is an extension of the artistic work into the public sphere and, along with printed publications and digital presence, the most important medium for connecting the artistic work with the public. At the request of your colleague Ken Tony, I have sourced all the exhibition venues. I have also shortened the list. Many thanks. MarcAnder79 ( talk) 12:56, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
Could you please take a look at the contributions of 61.239.182.35 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)? I suspect that they are all vandalism and should be reversed, but I don't know much about Singapore culture and I don't want to undo a good edit by mistake. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 18:33, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Dear Robertsky, (sorry posted this reply on my Talk page..copying here) Please check the history of Andreas Müller-Pohle Talk page. I tagged it with WikiProject Biography, WikiProject Germany, WikiProject Photography / History. I did not rate it in any of those WikiProjects. KylieTastic has edited it but doesn't appear to have rated it either. There was apparently what must have been a Draft of this page created by the red-linked MarcAnder79 on 9 June (seen in the Talk and Article histories) but that draft didn't come up in my search on 26 June in creating the page from translations from the German and French. MarcAnder79's draft must since been deleted since there is nothing but what I uploaded on the entry. This is weird and very confusing. Jamesmcardle (talk) 11:17, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
@ Jamesmcardle: the history of the draft has since merged into the article. You can look for the draft in the history of the article. – robertsky ( talk) 11:28, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
@ Robertsky: I was just responding to your message "Hi, I'm Robertsky. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Andreas Müller-Pohle, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you." which puzzled me because I have not rated Andreas Müller-Pohle - where does it show I had? I tagged only. Jamesmcardle (talk) 11:34, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi – robertsky,
Thanks for your feedback. Can you suggest changes to make my contribution to this article more neutral? /info/en/?search=Maxim's_Caterers#Controversies
I used independent sources and was not promoting any content at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marjoriepedrozo ( talk • contribs)
Hi, you recently Draftified Vintage Camera Museum for COI. I was the one who accepted it from AfC. I'm relatively new to reviewing AfC and I want to learn from my mistakes. Would you mind letting me know how you could tell / why you thought it's a COI? Because the draft didn't come off that way to me at all. Thanks! Mcguy15 ( talk, contribs) 14:36, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Robertsky. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.
Please take a moment to review
Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially
the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow
post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect
is used. This can be done using
Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to
secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status
can be revoked.
Useful links:
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! TonyBallioni ( talk) 18:23, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Dear Rovertsky, hi. Great to meet you. I would like to explain the page that i submit for review, for the Draft:Jacky Liew (Si Gongzi) ( /info/en/?search=Draft:Jacky_Liew_(Si_Gongzi)) It was translated from the Chinese version ( https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%BB%96%E5%9F%8E%E5%85%B0) which has been verified that the person has the notability and provided with Chinese reference. If you find that there are something need to be delete, kindly provide me some guidance for me to have amendment and resubmit again. Thank you.
Patricialiew ( talk) 15:33, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Patricialiew ( talk) 20:21, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Patricialiew ( talk) 14:35, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Naosaku Takahashi is a historical person and was an important figure of social work in Japan, during and after the war, WWII. Unfortunately, his writings and critical evaluations were published in Japanese only. But I (IyataYada) tried to cite the limited literature which is housed in National Diet Library of Japan for reference.
Yes, as you said, he is not a famous in the U.S.A. and other foreign countries. However, is it wrong that I introduce a famous man in Japan to the world in English? Moreover, he is already a historical person. He is dead. But I don't think that his life for the people should be killed in English speaking world. His Japanese version of Wikipedia is as follows:
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%AB%99%E6%A9%8B%E7%9B%B4%E4%BD%9C
IyataYada ( talk) 18:54, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
greetings, you have declined the submission of this page: /info/en/?search=Draft:Lokesh_Chugh#Page_about_Mr._Lokesh_Chugh%2C_an_eminent_politician_who_is_well_known_for_raising_student_matters._We_look_forward_to_approval_of_the_concerned_page. on what basic grounds i dont know, he being an eminent politician having verified twitter and facebook accounts I think have more than enough credibility for being on a normal information seeking platform for the youth. He will not get harmed in any way for not being on wikipedia, but will affect tremendously the youth who see him as his ideal and approach him to get their grievances solved. so, i request you to tell me what is the reason behind you declining his page.-- Muskaan sachdeva ( talk) 09:05, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
good evning, first of all i have been in regular conversation with him and we reached on a consensus too. next, sub division is already there in the politica life column. only three reference links are there in the end just because they have all three components like personal, professional and political life, so ideally no sub division could be done. but, still if you want me to do sub division please guide me on where to add the three links. i look forward to your response. thank you-- Muskaan sachdeva ( talk) 17:16, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Hey, Zhang Jingchu has had several IP editors change her birthdate without a source and without explanation to several different conflicting dates, and I wouldn't know which is correct. Under 'Early life' a 1977 date is given, but is sourced to 'chinesemov.com' which doesn't seem like a reliable source to me. Thought I'd contact you again about this issue given your diligence in this field. Great work with reverting unsourced stuff (especially the massive amount of unexplained height additions!) on BLPs. Waxworker ( talk) 07:10, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi @Robertsky, there is an article we submitted with references that were added. But it has never been reviewed. Kindly advise on what else needs to be done. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by PGCAfrica ( talk • contribs) 20:40, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
@Robertsky, thanks for your response. The link as follows: /info/en/?search=User:PGCAfrica/sandbox — Preceding unsigned comment added by PGCAfrica ( talk • contribs) 21:06, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
@Robertsky, thank you once again for your helpfulness. I have reworked on the references, which are related to the the subject matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PGCAfrica ( talk • contribs) 19:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi,
I see you edited the AfC mailing lists. We are using these for the backlog so I have completely updated from the base lists. I think all the manual removals you did are included on the update.
Cheers KylieTastic ( talk) 20:00, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello Robertsky:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long
Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 3000 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.
hi, which group of users they can move a page to draft?-- Reza Amper ( talk) 20:01, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
hi robert you have reviewed my page and you note that the list of positions/memberships should be converted into prose expand into a chronology but I think that most of the pages that contain positions and memberships do not carry a chronological order So I thought it was not mandatory — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elshitaq ( talk • contribs) 21:13, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi Robertsky,
Thank you very much for your help and review! I was encouraged for further contributions to Wikipedia.
Best regards, IyataYada ( talk • contribs) 13:38, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing my draft: TobeyCMossGallery webpage. My first one. This gallery has now closed and this is not an advertisement but rather a history of my mother's 40 year noteworthy career and mission, as best as I could state it. All the words have references cited below. So, are you saying that even if I properly cite something, I can't show it here? I don't understand. In another section of the rules, it says DO NOT say anything that ISN'T published somewhere else. So, I am damned if I do and damned if I don't. Please explain exactly which sentence is the problem.
DavidJMoss (
talk) 19:28, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
DavidJMoss ( talk) 19:28, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
I sort of get it. I reread the copyright violations and see that any copyrighted words I put in can then be freely used and copied. which is not good. I will look at the whole thing again. DavidJMoss ( talk) 20:01, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Robertsky, regarding Draft:TobeyCMossGallery I do not see any text copied from 'Encouraged by veteran...' onward in [5]. Are you reading a much older version? Is the version that Spilbrick edited on at 19:31, 9 July 2021 acceptable to you? If that version is acceptable, I am ok with it. If you have a problem with the inclusion of some of the cited references because THEY are copyrighted, I am ok with removing them. Please let me know. DavidJMoss ( talk) 22:53, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
On 12 July 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jose Jaime Espina, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 01:54, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
You last reviewed my page and demanded that positions and memberships be in the form of a prose paragraph with chronology And attach sources as much as possible And I actually improved it based on your notice And I think it's ready for your review /info/en/?search=Draft:Abdullah_Sulaiman_Al_Rajhi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elshitaq ( talk • contribs)
I have resolved the citations thank you very much I appreciate your help and tell me if there is anything wrong !
Re your comment on WP:UAA, "recommend user to reach out to OTRS with birth cert?"
If you haven't read or seen The Day of the Jackal ( book, film), it's a good yarn. The storyline will shake your assumption that a birth certificate proves identity. - Cabayi ( talk) 09:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
So are wikis are good or not on the draft? Starkiryu64 ( talk) 23:27, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Could TV Tropes be okay? Starkiryu64 ( talk) 22:24, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Just a reminder, not a threat.
Be aware of this rule, which was told to me. Charliestalnaker ( talk) 05:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at River Valley High School, Singapore shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
@ Charliestalnaker: I am more than aware about 3rr. This is more applicable to you than me. – robertsky ( talk) 05:37, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
( talk page stalker) I believe this established a threat to robertsky. -- Justanothersgwikieditor ( talk) 05:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Great work on Newspaper and Printing Presses Act Robertsky. One of the most fascinating articles on Singapore's history I have seen in a while. It's great to see what is typically relegated to the history books brought to life in a Wikipedia article as easily accessible knowledge. Seloloving ( talk) 17:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC) |
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bkissin ( talk) 14:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Thank you for helping with the query for the AfC backlog drive leaderboard, and for helping to keep it updated! Enterprisey ( talk!) 07:56, 28 July 2021 (UTC) |
Books & Bytes
Issue 45, May – June 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:05, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Would taking pictures of his Diplomas constitute reliable sources?
Kieron Taylor ( talk) 12:10, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
The serial has been premired and has notable actors like Mahira Khan, Kubra Khan, Usman Mukhtar. The firat episode of the serial has been released and it received good reviews. Not only the reliable and big newspaper of the country such as Dawn News, The News International wrote about it but Daily Times Pakistan and GalaxyLollywood reviewed it also. So, I thonk the article is notable enough to be published. Phaans ( talk) 05:22, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
I have added the added the section of criticla reception with those references of critics take on serial's episodes. Please, rereview it as now it is ready for publishing. Phaans ( talk) 05:54, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
<Hi! i edited the page and believe it to not come off as biased and have reffered to other charitys wikipedias to create this-->
< I have reviewed my changes and believe it should be okay for submission
Writerday (
talk) 20:16, 5 August 2021 (UTC)->
Writerday (
talk) 20:16, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Writerday ( talk) 20:18, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi Robertsky,
Thanks for your speedy review of my re-submitted draft, I appreciate it a lot. However, being new to Wikipedia I'm not quite sure how to proceed based on the feedback you provided. Regarding the reason given for the decline ("This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article."), I feel that the draft now lives up to summarizing the book (previously the concept, now the book), that it doesn't contain opinions or original research and that the point of view is neutral point, with the text merely describing what the authors argue and what commentators have said about the book. The one thing I suppose could be lacking is reliable secondary sources about the book, but that should hardly be necessary since the draft is now about the book itself and summarizes what is written in the book (i.e. the book itself is the secondary source)?
I would very much appreciate if you could give me some more specific pointers on how to meet the standards.
You also left the comment "Literature review", which leaves me a little bit perplexed. How/what do you mean?
Again, thanks a lot! Tim Isaksson ( talk) 09:51, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Tim Isaksson ( talk) 09:51, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi I saw you declined my request for an excessively promotional language. Is there any paragraph in particular I should change? Could you clarify your suggestion? Gibbone22 ( talk) 02:48, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Thank you, I'll make sure the previous submissions won't be cancelled. Looking forward for other suggestions Gibbone22 ( talk) 03:23, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi, thank you very much for your suggestions. I've modified the draft accordingly, and replied to each point. Is there anything else I could do? I'm a bit confused by the suggestion regarding the paragraph "History". UGEI has done many activities, listing all of them would be an endless work. As an overview those info should be fine, no? Gibbone22 ( talk) 16:10, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your help and your changes, I've added other sources and submitted the draft again. Gibbone22 ( talk) 01:38, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Hey, whenever you have a chance, take a peek at the restructuring I did over at Draft:Unione Giovani Ebrei d'Italia. I didn't add any additional sources, but I tried at the very least to make it sound less like an advert. Let me know what you think. Bkissin ( talk) 19:15, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Draft in question: Draft:UTEC – The University of Tokyo Edge Capital Partners
Could you please explain why my draft with more references than the original language wiki article gets rejected? I'm just trying to create an English wiki page for this company.
https://ja.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%9D%B1%E4%BA%AC%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%A6%E3%82%A8%E3%83%83%E3%82%B8%E3%82%AD%E3%83%A3%E3%83%94%E3%82%BF%E3%83%AB%E3%83%91%E3%83%BC%E3%83%88%E3%83%8A%E3%83%BC%E3%82%BA Kakka42 ( talk) 09:53, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Article in question: AUDT Coin
Thanks for reviewing my draft. Just wanted to double check with you: the references are supposed to have a section header, correct? –– 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲 talk 05:39, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
{{reflist}}
or <references />
. Thanks for alerting me! I have filed this as
an issue for the script.
– robertsky (
talk) 05:45, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi I created the article more than a month ago after a great effort and suffering in order to develop and improve it in order to be eligible for acceptance I have hired some editors to help me on the subject Indeed, as a result of this work, the article was accepted after review And make sure So far, everything is fine and normal But after more than a month, the article was deleted, and I was surprised by this decision, which I see as unjust according to logic Because the article has been reviewed by an expert and has been accepted, which means that it meets all the criteria link: /info/en/?search=Abdullah_Bin_Sulaiman_Al_Rajhi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elshitaq ( talk • contribs)
Draft in question: Draft:SMK Global Multimedia Creative School
Is there any way that I can make the article with reliable sources and make it look independent as possible? Dragonslay041 ( talk) 09:59, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Draft:Lim_Teck_Ghee hi an editor has made the suggested changes. can you approve it? thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by MYMMMC ( talk • contribs)
Hello,
Romain Perrot is an artist and a researcher who works on many different projects. Vomir is only one of them and even if it is his main activity now, i do think that it is more accurate to write an article about him rather than add some informations on Vomir's page.
Would it be possible to reconsider your position on this article?
Thank you in advance,
Paola.ortiz.fr ( talk) 16:51, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
@ Paola.ortiz.fr: my opinion is that a single article encompassing all his identities is sufficient. An example would be Shirley Temple who was a renowned actress and a diplomat. – robertsky ( talk) 01:52, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
@
Robertsky: I agree with you, that's why I think an article about someone (Romain Perrot / Shirley Temple) is more appropriate.
Vomir is only a stage name and most of the time he isn't working under this name, so I can't complete Vomir's article. It's like writing an article about a character that Shirley Temple played and speak about her diplomatic work.
Paola.ortiz.fr (
talk) 17:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Singapore International School, Mumbai.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:46, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Dear @ Robertsky:,
I'm not sure whether you will be the one reviewing this article or not, but I wanted to write in any case. Regarding your kind previous help with reviewing my draft article – see the archived discussion here – I have now divided the article into two: one for the book and one for the concept in general. I have also put serious effort into writing in a more encyclopaedic style. Naturally, this overhaul has entailed a lot of re-writing, shortening and restructuring. (And upon publication, I would add the book cover art and get the de-orphan and redirect stuff up and running.) As you and others pointed out, it was worth it! The result is much better and more useful for readers. I really feel like these articles can be of great benefit to people all over the world, and thanks for making that even more true.
All the best
/ Tim Isaksson ( talk) 18:07, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
The Articles for Creation Barnstar & The Teamwork Barnstar | ||
Congratulations! You have earned The Articles for Creation Barnstar and The Teamwork Barnstar for reviewing 194 drafts and doing 43 re-reviews during the
WikiProject Articles for creation
July 2021 Backlog Drive. Thank you for your work to improve Wikipedia! On behalf of WikiProject Articles for Creation, Enterprisey ( talk!) 00:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC) |
On 7 September 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Tunch Ilkin, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 22:35, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello there. Thank you for reviewing my entry on Iman Amrani. I am unsure how it reads as an advertisement. It is a collection of information about an influential young British-Algerian journalist who has contributed not only in reporting some of the biggest events in Europe, Latin-America and the UK over the past four years, as well as contributing to a debate about men and mental health in an award winning series. She doesn't do many interviews because for her it's about the work, not her, as is the case of most journalists. I studied other journalists' entries before starting the biography one can be found at this link -
/info/en/?search=Maggie_O%27Kane - and wrote to that template. After your review I have added more external links of other interviews she has done as a result of her most recent work. I am unsure what else to add given that the wealth and diversity of the work she continues to do for the Guardian platform and more recently for Al Jazeera. Any advice most gratefully received
Captbalbo (
talk) 16:23, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Captbalbo (
talk) 16:21, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello again. I see what you mean. Thank you for the advice. Maggie O'Kane's wasn't the only one that I accessed as research but I take your point. There aren't a lot of articles commenting Iman's work, as is the case with a lot of young journalists however I see how I should change the structure and the language. Will get to work on that right away. Thanks again Captbalbo ( talk) 14:39, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Draft in question: Draft:Hans Georg Näder
Hello Robertsky, I am stuck with my Draft. I have rewritten it and yet it is not neutral. What can I do to make it neutral and so you can accept it? Please help. – Centrereded ( talk) 01:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Wong Cho-lam's birthdate has been changed from 1980 to 1970, and this seems to be an edit made in good faith by an IP editor (doesn't seem related to the ongoing issue with birth date vandalism from Malaysian IP), and I have no way of verifying if the new date is correct. I would appreciate your assistance with this given your expertise. Thank you. Waxworker ( talk) 08:48, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello Robertsky,
Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.
Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.
At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.
There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.
Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
오리지널 반스타 | |
Thnak you for your advising my edit. 칼빈500 ( talk) 13:53, 16 September 2021 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading File:Invictus International School logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:23, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 46, July – August 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Hey your comment at Draft:Kolkatar Harry has been modified by me as per your comment I added Production and some details. I am waiting for your reply. २ तकर पेप्सी ( talk) 12:07, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Robertsky, the draft article for Jake Ejercito is passes the
WP:NBIO
AnsrieJames9 (
talk) 09:09, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Robertsky! Please accepted this article that passes the WP:GNG AnsrieJames9 ( talk) 03:27, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Yep AnsrieJames9 ( talk) 03:42, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Thanks Robertsky for your guidance, i highly appreciate your reply, as it’s much more clarity to me as new user.Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrlyn005 ( talk • contribs)
Respected Dear Sir, help us to save this page. I have high hopes from you, please save this page and don't let it get deleted if possible. According to Wikipedia's rules, if possible, I have done my own investigation and found the information on the page to be correct. expect you. Wikipedia rules are important to me. Special thanks. Personally I have no relation with this page, but I have spent a lot of time in collecting its information, if this page cannot be saved according to any rule, then finally delete this page. Thanks so much dear sir Ajit Kumar Srivastava (producer) talk 04:23, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
Dear User:Robertsky,
This is francabicon here and i would like to seek your assistance of judgement regarding the matter of my edit on three topics:
Here is my edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Malaysian_United_Indigenous_Party&oldid=1053371794
Here is my edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=United_Malays_National_Organisation&oldid=105337095
Here is my edit:
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Malaysian_Islamic_Party&oldid=1053371583
Here is the problem I've edited 3 topics of Ideology, Controversy whit assisted contribution by many members but has been taken down by this
User:Amir Noor Muhammad. I repeatedly told the user that if he has any arguments of this topic the user can talk to me about it but the user didn't just not talk to me about it and removed large chunks of our contribution of it which i don't think is fair for the people who had place an effort contribution to the new section of the page. Also adding to the fact that he had many Controversy on this talk page where the many user had criticize him for similar behaviour like that which you may check right over here:
User talk:Amir Noor Muhammad.
Also the user had written to ban me from editing with his recent revert. The reason that the user always revert my edit is that "it's not related" "personal not on party lines" which i then replied to him stating that " so long as they are part of the party their political action is related to the party" but the user still insist on reverting.
Hope you understand that i don't mind to be wrong but i would like your best judgment on what you can do to resolve this matter because those topics are with valid links and valid facts. Thank you.
hope to hear frm you soon do talk to me if you do want to know more.
User talk:Francabicon
Books & Bytes
Issue 47, September – October 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Tolaram Group logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:50, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello Robertsky. Could you please check Reza Goodary's article? It's WP:N as WP:NKICK (Fighting for WBC and WMC world title). Also references full covered WP:NWSRC. This article seems to deserve a move to WP:Mainspace. Thank you. AriaTess ( talk) 08:20, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Pls move it back thank u Jade Ping-ay ( talk) 11:56, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello editor, sequel to your initial recommendations, do check Draft:Funmilayo_Waheed-Adekojo and advise where necessary for further improvement. OLYRIDWANA ( talk) 06:15, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Many thanks. OLYRIDWANA ( talk) 14:39, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
I'll reach out to the submitter. I'm on Wikiproject Fraternities and I'm familiar with Philippine Fraternities and Sororities. Frankly, the submitter (who probably is a Gamma Delta Epsilon brother, but coming through the Draft Process, it may actually be a good thing) was quite reasonable to include the controversies, it isn't unusual, and may be one of the most likely things to actually be referencable. University of Santo Tomas is the oldest law school in the Philippines going back several centuries. If he can find third party to show membership of both of the Chief Justices of the Philippines, that would be enough on its own, but there are probably others. (And I've *definitely* seen worse drafts) Naraht ( talk) 14:50, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your contributions to Wikipedia! I've learnt a lot from you on how to edit a link! I do hope you will get fully recovered from the illness soon! Jm120791 ( talk) 16:06, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
The Patroller's Barnstar | ||
For reviewing at least 100 articles during the drive. |
Thank you for reviewing or re-reviewing 104 articles, which helped contribute to an overall 1276-article reduction in the backlog during the drive. ( t · c) buidhe 12:29, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
he is my secondary school friend, what do you mean it is a mistake. attached is a photo of me and him in secondary school, thanks. 101.78.109.225 ( talk) 17:09, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Robertsky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ho Kwong Yew, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 17:01, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Robertsky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rail Corridor (Singapore), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 23:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
On 26 December 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Poh Lip Meng, which you created and nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 16:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, please take a look at [6]. I'm unable to file a report.
PS: Huyu is Singaporean instead of Vietnamese — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6011:340:4D6:44F1:EEC5:89A8:FED5 ( talk) 00:14, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi !
You reverted some of my edits, but your external websites are not foul-proof...
-- FromZeFild ( talk) 19:19, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi! Just like to check, is there anything else to update on in Mediacorp artiste articles, just to clarify? I'm not sure if the update tag can be removed from articles like Chantalle Ng and other relevant ones. Thanks. TheGreatSG'rean ( talk) 05:46, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Robertsky!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Dan arndt (
talk) 12:18, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
|
@ Dan arndt: 🤣 – robertsky ( talk) 12:33, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Goo Hara you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shushugah -- Shushugah ( talk) 10:40, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
The article Goo Hara you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Goo Hara for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shushugah -- Shushugah ( talk) 21:41, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Robertsky, based on your contribution in Goh Jin Wei article, i have some suggestion about cite web template:
I hope this will be useful for your next edits. Thank you. Stvbastian ( talk) 11:27, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
language=en
, I don't see any documentation that it shouldn't be used. Even if it is used, I don't see any rendering issues?
– robertsky (
talk) 22:25, 23 January 2022 (UTC)On 24 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Goo Hara, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after Goo Hara's mother abandoned her and Goo died young, South Korean law was changed to prevent such parents from claiming inheritance? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Goo Hara. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Goo Hara), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 00:03, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 48, November – December 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Can this count as proof that it can go to main space? https://news.abs-cbn.com/entertainment/02/04/22/look-lovi-poe-shares-first-glimpse-of-flower-of-evil — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.54.102.0 ( talk) 11:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Please do not bite the newcomers Understand that newcomers are both necessary for and valuable to the community. By helping newcomers, we can increase the range of knowledge, perspectives, and ideas on Wikipedia, thereby preserving its neutrality and integrity as a resource and ultimately increasing its value. In fact, it has been found that newcomers are responsible for adding the majority of substantive edits, i.e. lasting content; while insiders and administrators are responsible for a large number of total edits, these often involve tweaking, reverting, and rearranging content. Remember, our motto and our invitation to the newcomer is be bold. We have a set of rules, standards, and traditions, but they must not be applied in such a way as to thwart the efforts of newcomers who take that invitation at face value. A newcomer brings a wealth of ideas, creativity and experience from other areas that, current rules and standards aside, have the potential to better our community and Wikipedia as a whole. It may be that the rules and standards need revising or expanding; perhaps what the newcomer is doing "wrong" may ultimately improve Wikipedia. Observe for a while and, if necessary, ask what the newcomer is trying to achieve before concluding that their efforts are wanting or that they are simply "wrong". If a newcomer seems to have made a small mistake, e.g. forgot to put a book title in italics, correct it yourself but do not slam the newcomer. A gentle note on their user page explaining the Wikipedia standard and how to achieve it in the future may prove helpful, as they may be unfamiliar with the norm or merely how to achieve it. Remember, this is a place where anyone may edit and therefore it is each person's responsibility to edit and complement, rather than to criticize or supervise others. If you use bad manners or curse at newcomers, they may decide not to contribute again.
[Summary] The customer is always right. [Harry Gordon Selfridge, 1858-1947]
[An ancient Chinese proverb] Don't bite the hand that feeds
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.1.219.200 ( talk) 15:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
I wholeheartedly agree with this, and it is particularly true for articles concerning countries where English is not widely spoken, and developing countries. Natives of these countries have as much right to be editing Wikipedia as we do, and yet they have more hurdles to jump than we who have English as our mother tongue and can more easily learn the correct protocols for editing Wikipedia and the tricks of the trade. Thank you for sharing this, it is a valuable reminder. Amirah talk 22:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Courtesy Link: There is a recreation of an article previously merged Talk:Mya Thwe Thwe Khaing with your vote -> Death of Mya Thwe Thwe Khine. Feel free to participate in the deletion discussion. CommanderWaterford ( talk) 18:03, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 42, January – February 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:28, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Dear editors, developers and friends:
Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.
Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.
Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Robertsky, I hope you are well. There is a discussion at Wikimedia Commons about the position to take on images from Singapore here: c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gan Siow Huang 1.jpg. It is a discussion with significant implications for Singapore-related photos, so I thought it might be of interest to you, and I think your view would benefit the discussion. Kohlrabi Pickle ( talk) 03:36, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, apparently radio stations by SPH have been redirected because of lack of independent and verifiable content. Is there any idea how to resolve this so that at least the radio stations can be there? Thanks. TheGreatSG'rean ( talk) 17:17, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Robertsky. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at
WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 20:55, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
I've seen that you've done great work with reverting the nonstop amount of birthdate and unsourced height additions added by IPs in Malaysia, as well as finding refs for the correct dates. I've reverted a lot of it myself, but I'd like to ask for your assistance with Qin Lan, as if you look in the history, many IPs have changed her birthdate to several different conflicting years, and I wouldn't know which one is correct. I don't have the expertise to deal with this, and figured you would. Thanks. Waxworker ( talk) 15:05, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Ouch, I'm so sorry, I should do research! Cheers, Hockeycatcat ( talk) 09:28, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Well, congratulations on your graduation! Someone will probably find a source soon since the rename was recent. Cheers, Hockeycatcat ( talk) 09:41, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
That's good, hopefully there won't be any more confusion from now on! Cheers, Hockeycatcat ( talk) 09:44, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Good idea! Hockeycatcat ( talk) 10:07, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Total Defence Logo 2020.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:59, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Robertsky, I noticed that you removed links to further reading that I added in entries related to COVID-19 apps. While I agree with your reasoning in some cases (e.g. the links might be too country-specific for the "contact tracing" entry), I do believe that they are very relevant to other entries such as "COVID-19 apps" and "Corona-Warn-App". I also don't think these links violate the guidelines on external links. Could you please explain why do you feel otherwise, so I can better understand how to add/edit such sections? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.181.78.252 ( talk) 9:58, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
See point 6 under WP:ELNO. – robertsky ( talk) 10:15, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
And WP:ELPOV – robertsky ( talk) 10:19, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
The article City Developments Limited you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:City Developments Limited for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Willbb234 -- Willbb234 ( talk) 15:21, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 43, March – April 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:12, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Am I missing something with the English version of Culture of Singapore? Why was there stuff being removed constantly, because in other languages it seems like there's no problem. It seems like the German version hasn't existed yet so I am planning on creating one. I am willing to translate to my native language, but which version? One has much less information than the other. It would seem weird if one language has more information than the other, especially since English is considered the language that most people understands. Thanks. BrandenburgWatch ( talk) 18:15, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Re: [2], Libera.chat is actually an internal link. :-P
In other news, see also: meta:Wikimedia Forum#Freenode_(IRC)
-- Kim Bruning ( talk) 16:12, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello Robertsky, would you be able to help me remove 'MP' from all our politicians' pages with AWB when you have the time? 'MP' is not a postnominal and merely a position, and I wish to standardise the pages like those belonging to that of British politicians, who don't have 'MP' as part of their name. Thank you. Seloloving ( talk) 00:39, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
They're all available under this link. At the top of the page, they're licensed under the creative commons 4.0 license (listed as a white bar at the top of the page). https://www.ycod.org/design-files
The links to news sites are needed for Wikipedia notability. Evanroden1 ( talk) 09:43, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
I noticed you 'reviewed' a page I have contributed to/suggested - just wondering if you have any suggestions? Thank you @Robertsky ! Ajcwritwiki ( talk) 14:59, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:2021 Singaporean television seasons indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 14:26, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Pingat Jasa Gemilang (Wikipedia) | |
For your tireless and longstanding efforts to improve the quality of Singapore-related Wikipedia articles, for your contribution to building a Singaporean Wikipedia community, I award you the Pingat Jasa Gemilang (Wikipedia) for May 2021. Thank you for all that you do! Kohlrabi Pickle ( talk) 03:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC) |
First you tell me what souce you used to write this some incorrect information about the great king Sambhaji. There are very few nonsence books/writers who at one side doing defamation of Sambhaji while stating about his contribution and bravery on other side. How much this is logical you think. You just took the summery of these books and content of some distorted writers right. So there huge number of books who describes the real sambhaji which is proof of this that The true story is Sambhaji was an ideal king who didn't have any bad addiction and was a symbol for bravery and patriotism which he shown in his sacrifice. He was a great king that's how he managed to defeat Aurangzeb Right? How a king who is badly addicted can manage this? And why Shehenshah of Hindustan Aurangzeb can be so desperate to capture like such King which is coloured by some distorted writer? Use simple logic. Sambhaji is a god for many people so stop his defamation. Swarajya History.. ( talk) 04:04, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
It looks as Some unrealistic events and Defamation about sambhaji made on Wikipedia is based on the articles of some distorted writers. Is that before publishing it on Wikipedia Google don't validate the articles? Because in your links there are many references which you have given tells the real story about Sambhaji. I am from Sambhaji's Land and know the true facts however I can provide you the references from government site but those are in Marathi language, will that work? Swarajya History.. ( talk) 10:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
I have moved the existing redirect out of the way, so you are free to accept
Draft:Lao Khao. --
Ahecht (
TALK
PAGE) 17:13, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:2020s Singaporean television seasons indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:47, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi! I am bit confused to what just happened with the article. I was waiting for it to be moved to a separate article, but it just became a redirect? May I know the reason why? I have edited it significantly and I believe that publication of the article is warranted. Thank you! Pampi1010 ( talk) 17:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
Thank you for checking out the Thomasian Welcome Walk page Pampi1010 ( talk) 10:34, 17 June 2021 (UTC) |
Thanks for your speedy review of my first attempt at Draft:University of Toronto School of the Environment. I've expanded the article a little, and added a number of citations from secondary sources. I'm relatively new to this - I've made lots of small edits in Wikipedia before, but this is my first new article, so if I've messed up, please let me know! GunterGruen ( talk) 21:37, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello – robertsky The draft I moved ie Enobong Akoabio was a mistake I was trying to move a draft from draftspace not my sandbox I am infact trying to delete the article. I can't seem to find the move draft from draftspace to mainspace or for review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zend2020 ( talk • contribs)
Hello – robertsky I actually done that already i.e blanked the page before your message came in how could i move a draft for review or to mainspace?-- Zend2020 ( talk) 22:11, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
– robertsky Wow any idea how i can reverse this mess — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zend2020 ( talk • contribs)
- robertskyMany Thanks-- Zend2020 ( talk) 06:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi – robertsky,
Thanks for your feedback. Can you suggest changes to make this article more neutral? /info/en/?search=Dealstreetasia Sagekreyol ( talk) 00:55, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, this submission has already gone through three revisions, and your objection has not been made by anyone before. Could you please specify which statement you consider inappropriate and which sources - they are all neutral third party sources - are not correct? Thank you for an answer as precise as possible. MarcAnder79 (talk) 13:37, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
MarcAnder79 ( talk) 16:52, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your hints and comments, I think the noted passages are now all provided with reliable sources. Regarding "Exhibitions, Screenings, Installations": these are an indispensable part of a lexical artist article (compare other artist articles, for example on Sebastiao Salgado) that reflects the notability of the artist. An artist exhibition is not to be confused with a fair exhibition. It is an extension of the artistic work into the public sphere and, along with printed publications and digital presence, the most important medium for connecting the artistic work with the public. At the request of your colleague Ken Tony, I have sourced all the exhibition venues. I have also shortened the list. Many thanks. MarcAnder79 ( talk) 12:56, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
Could you please take a look at the contributions of 61.239.182.35 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)? I suspect that they are all vandalism and should be reversed, but I don't know much about Singapore culture and I don't want to undo a good edit by mistake. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 18:33, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Dear Robertsky, (sorry posted this reply on my Talk page..copying here) Please check the history of Andreas Müller-Pohle Talk page. I tagged it with WikiProject Biography, WikiProject Germany, WikiProject Photography / History. I did not rate it in any of those WikiProjects. KylieTastic has edited it but doesn't appear to have rated it either. There was apparently what must have been a Draft of this page created by the red-linked MarcAnder79 on 9 June (seen in the Talk and Article histories) but that draft didn't come up in my search on 26 June in creating the page from translations from the German and French. MarcAnder79's draft must since been deleted since there is nothing but what I uploaded on the entry. This is weird and very confusing. Jamesmcardle (talk) 11:17, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
@ Jamesmcardle: the history of the draft has since merged into the article. You can look for the draft in the history of the article. – robertsky ( talk) 11:28, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
@ Robertsky: I was just responding to your message "Hi, I'm Robertsky. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Andreas Müller-Pohle, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you." which puzzled me because I have not rated Andreas Müller-Pohle - where does it show I had? I tagged only. Jamesmcardle (talk) 11:34, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi – robertsky,
Thanks for your feedback. Can you suggest changes to make my contribution to this article more neutral? /info/en/?search=Maxim's_Caterers#Controversies
I used independent sources and was not promoting any content at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marjoriepedrozo ( talk • contribs)
Hi, you recently Draftified Vintage Camera Museum for COI. I was the one who accepted it from AfC. I'm relatively new to reviewing AfC and I want to learn from my mistakes. Would you mind letting me know how you could tell / why you thought it's a COI? Because the draft didn't come off that way to me at all. Thanks! Mcguy15 ( talk, contribs) 14:36, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Robertsky. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.
Please take a moment to review
Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially
the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow
post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect
is used. This can be done using
Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to
secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status
can be revoked.
Useful links:
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! TonyBallioni ( talk) 18:23, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Dear Rovertsky, hi. Great to meet you. I would like to explain the page that i submit for review, for the Draft:Jacky Liew (Si Gongzi) ( /info/en/?search=Draft:Jacky_Liew_(Si_Gongzi)) It was translated from the Chinese version ( https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%BB%96%E5%9F%8E%E5%85%B0) which has been verified that the person has the notability and provided with Chinese reference. If you find that there are something need to be delete, kindly provide me some guidance for me to have amendment and resubmit again. Thank you.
Patricialiew ( talk) 15:33, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Patricialiew ( talk) 20:21, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Patricialiew ( talk) 14:35, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Naosaku Takahashi is a historical person and was an important figure of social work in Japan, during and after the war, WWII. Unfortunately, his writings and critical evaluations were published in Japanese only. But I (IyataYada) tried to cite the limited literature which is housed in National Diet Library of Japan for reference.
Yes, as you said, he is not a famous in the U.S.A. and other foreign countries. However, is it wrong that I introduce a famous man in Japan to the world in English? Moreover, he is already a historical person. He is dead. But I don't think that his life for the people should be killed in English speaking world. His Japanese version of Wikipedia is as follows:
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%AB%99%E6%A9%8B%E7%9B%B4%E4%BD%9C
IyataYada ( talk) 18:54, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
greetings, you have declined the submission of this page: /info/en/?search=Draft:Lokesh_Chugh#Page_about_Mr._Lokesh_Chugh%2C_an_eminent_politician_who_is_well_known_for_raising_student_matters._We_look_forward_to_approval_of_the_concerned_page. on what basic grounds i dont know, he being an eminent politician having verified twitter and facebook accounts I think have more than enough credibility for being on a normal information seeking platform for the youth. He will not get harmed in any way for not being on wikipedia, but will affect tremendously the youth who see him as his ideal and approach him to get their grievances solved. so, i request you to tell me what is the reason behind you declining his page.-- Muskaan sachdeva ( talk) 09:05, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
good evning, first of all i have been in regular conversation with him and we reached on a consensus too. next, sub division is already there in the politica life column. only three reference links are there in the end just because they have all three components like personal, professional and political life, so ideally no sub division could be done. but, still if you want me to do sub division please guide me on where to add the three links. i look forward to your response. thank you-- Muskaan sachdeva ( talk) 17:16, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Hey, Zhang Jingchu has had several IP editors change her birthdate without a source and without explanation to several different conflicting dates, and I wouldn't know which is correct. Under 'Early life' a 1977 date is given, but is sourced to 'chinesemov.com' which doesn't seem like a reliable source to me. Thought I'd contact you again about this issue given your diligence in this field. Great work with reverting unsourced stuff (especially the massive amount of unexplained height additions!) on BLPs. Waxworker ( talk) 07:10, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi @Robertsky, there is an article we submitted with references that were added. But it has never been reviewed. Kindly advise on what else needs to be done. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by PGCAfrica ( talk • contribs) 20:40, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
@Robertsky, thanks for your response. The link as follows: /info/en/?search=User:PGCAfrica/sandbox — Preceding unsigned comment added by PGCAfrica ( talk • contribs) 21:06, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
@Robertsky, thank you once again for your helpfulness. I have reworked on the references, which are related to the the subject matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PGCAfrica ( talk • contribs) 19:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi,
I see you edited the AfC mailing lists. We are using these for the backlog so I have completely updated from the base lists. I think all the manual removals you did are included on the update.
Cheers KylieTastic ( talk) 20:00, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello Robertsky:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long
Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 3000 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.
hi, which group of users they can move a page to draft?-- Reza Amper ( talk) 20:01, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
hi robert you have reviewed my page and you note that the list of positions/memberships should be converted into prose expand into a chronology but I think that most of the pages that contain positions and memberships do not carry a chronological order So I thought it was not mandatory — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elshitaq ( talk • contribs) 21:13, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi Robertsky,
Thank you very much for your help and review! I was encouraged for further contributions to Wikipedia.
Best regards, IyataYada ( talk • contribs) 13:38, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing my draft: TobeyCMossGallery webpage. My first one. This gallery has now closed and this is not an advertisement but rather a history of my mother's 40 year noteworthy career and mission, as best as I could state it. All the words have references cited below. So, are you saying that even if I properly cite something, I can't show it here? I don't understand. In another section of the rules, it says DO NOT say anything that ISN'T published somewhere else. So, I am damned if I do and damned if I don't. Please explain exactly which sentence is the problem.
DavidJMoss (
talk) 19:28, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
DavidJMoss ( talk) 19:28, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
I sort of get it. I reread the copyright violations and see that any copyrighted words I put in can then be freely used and copied. which is not good. I will look at the whole thing again. DavidJMoss ( talk) 20:01, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Robertsky, regarding Draft:TobeyCMossGallery I do not see any text copied from 'Encouraged by veteran...' onward in [5]. Are you reading a much older version? Is the version that Spilbrick edited on at 19:31, 9 July 2021 acceptable to you? If that version is acceptable, I am ok with it. If you have a problem with the inclusion of some of the cited references because THEY are copyrighted, I am ok with removing them. Please let me know. DavidJMoss ( talk) 22:53, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
On 12 July 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jose Jaime Espina, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 01:54, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
You last reviewed my page and demanded that positions and memberships be in the form of a prose paragraph with chronology And attach sources as much as possible And I actually improved it based on your notice And I think it's ready for your review /info/en/?search=Draft:Abdullah_Sulaiman_Al_Rajhi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elshitaq ( talk • contribs)
I have resolved the citations thank you very much I appreciate your help and tell me if there is anything wrong !
Re your comment on WP:UAA, "recommend user to reach out to OTRS with birth cert?"
If you haven't read or seen The Day of the Jackal ( book, film), it's a good yarn. The storyline will shake your assumption that a birth certificate proves identity. - Cabayi ( talk) 09:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
So are wikis are good or not on the draft? Starkiryu64 ( talk) 23:27, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Could TV Tropes be okay? Starkiryu64 ( talk) 22:24, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Just a reminder, not a threat.
Be aware of this rule, which was told to me. Charliestalnaker ( talk) 05:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at River Valley High School, Singapore shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
@ Charliestalnaker: I am more than aware about 3rr. This is more applicable to you than me. – robertsky ( talk) 05:37, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
( talk page stalker) I believe this established a threat to robertsky. -- Justanothersgwikieditor ( talk) 05:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Great work on Newspaper and Printing Presses Act Robertsky. One of the most fascinating articles on Singapore's history I have seen in a while. It's great to see what is typically relegated to the history books brought to life in a Wikipedia article as easily accessible knowledge. Seloloving ( talk) 17:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC) |
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bkissin ( talk) 14:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Thank you for helping with the query for the AfC backlog drive leaderboard, and for helping to keep it updated! Enterprisey ( talk!) 07:56, 28 July 2021 (UTC) |
Books & Bytes
Issue 45, May – June 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:05, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Would taking pictures of his Diplomas constitute reliable sources?
Kieron Taylor ( talk) 12:10, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
The serial has been premired and has notable actors like Mahira Khan, Kubra Khan, Usman Mukhtar. The firat episode of the serial has been released and it received good reviews. Not only the reliable and big newspaper of the country such as Dawn News, The News International wrote about it but Daily Times Pakistan and GalaxyLollywood reviewed it also. So, I thonk the article is notable enough to be published. Phaans ( talk) 05:22, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
I have added the added the section of criticla reception with those references of critics take on serial's episodes. Please, rereview it as now it is ready for publishing. Phaans ( talk) 05:54, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
<Hi! i edited the page and believe it to not come off as biased and have reffered to other charitys wikipedias to create this-->
< I have reviewed my changes and believe it should be okay for submission
Writerday (
talk) 20:16, 5 August 2021 (UTC)->
Writerday (
talk) 20:16, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Writerday ( talk) 20:18, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi Robertsky,
Thanks for your speedy review of my re-submitted draft, I appreciate it a lot. However, being new to Wikipedia I'm not quite sure how to proceed based on the feedback you provided. Regarding the reason given for the decline ("This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article."), I feel that the draft now lives up to summarizing the book (previously the concept, now the book), that it doesn't contain opinions or original research and that the point of view is neutral point, with the text merely describing what the authors argue and what commentators have said about the book. The one thing I suppose could be lacking is reliable secondary sources about the book, but that should hardly be necessary since the draft is now about the book itself and summarizes what is written in the book (i.e. the book itself is the secondary source)?
I would very much appreciate if you could give me some more specific pointers on how to meet the standards.
You also left the comment "Literature review", which leaves me a little bit perplexed. How/what do you mean?
Again, thanks a lot! Tim Isaksson ( talk) 09:51, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Tim Isaksson ( talk) 09:51, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi I saw you declined my request for an excessively promotional language. Is there any paragraph in particular I should change? Could you clarify your suggestion? Gibbone22 ( talk) 02:48, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Thank you, I'll make sure the previous submissions won't be cancelled. Looking forward for other suggestions Gibbone22 ( talk) 03:23, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi, thank you very much for your suggestions. I've modified the draft accordingly, and replied to each point. Is there anything else I could do? I'm a bit confused by the suggestion regarding the paragraph "History". UGEI has done many activities, listing all of them would be an endless work. As an overview those info should be fine, no? Gibbone22 ( talk) 16:10, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your help and your changes, I've added other sources and submitted the draft again. Gibbone22 ( talk) 01:38, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Hey, whenever you have a chance, take a peek at the restructuring I did over at Draft:Unione Giovani Ebrei d'Italia. I didn't add any additional sources, but I tried at the very least to make it sound less like an advert. Let me know what you think. Bkissin ( talk) 19:15, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Draft in question: Draft:UTEC – The University of Tokyo Edge Capital Partners
Could you please explain why my draft with more references than the original language wiki article gets rejected? I'm just trying to create an English wiki page for this company.
https://ja.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%9D%B1%E4%BA%AC%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%A6%E3%82%A8%E3%83%83%E3%82%B8%E3%82%AD%E3%83%A3%E3%83%94%E3%82%BF%E3%83%AB%E3%83%91%E3%83%BC%E3%83%88%E3%83%8A%E3%83%BC%E3%82%BA Kakka42 ( talk) 09:53, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Article in question: AUDT Coin
Thanks for reviewing my draft. Just wanted to double check with you: the references are supposed to have a section header, correct? –– 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲 talk 05:39, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
{{reflist}}
or <references />
. Thanks for alerting me! I have filed this as
an issue for the script.
– robertsky (
talk) 05:45, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi I created the article more than a month ago after a great effort and suffering in order to develop and improve it in order to be eligible for acceptance I have hired some editors to help me on the subject Indeed, as a result of this work, the article was accepted after review And make sure So far, everything is fine and normal But after more than a month, the article was deleted, and I was surprised by this decision, which I see as unjust according to logic Because the article has been reviewed by an expert and has been accepted, which means that it meets all the criteria link: /info/en/?search=Abdullah_Bin_Sulaiman_Al_Rajhi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elshitaq ( talk • contribs)
Draft in question: Draft:SMK Global Multimedia Creative School
Is there any way that I can make the article with reliable sources and make it look independent as possible? Dragonslay041 ( talk) 09:59, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Draft:Lim_Teck_Ghee hi an editor has made the suggested changes. can you approve it? thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by MYMMMC ( talk • contribs)
Hello,
Romain Perrot is an artist and a researcher who works on many different projects. Vomir is only one of them and even if it is his main activity now, i do think that it is more accurate to write an article about him rather than add some informations on Vomir's page.
Would it be possible to reconsider your position on this article?
Thank you in advance,
Paola.ortiz.fr ( talk) 16:51, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
@ Paola.ortiz.fr: my opinion is that a single article encompassing all his identities is sufficient. An example would be Shirley Temple who was a renowned actress and a diplomat. – robertsky ( talk) 01:52, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
@
Robertsky: I agree with you, that's why I think an article about someone (Romain Perrot / Shirley Temple) is more appropriate.
Vomir is only a stage name and most of the time he isn't working under this name, so I can't complete Vomir's article. It's like writing an article about a character that Shirley Temple played and speak about her diplomatic work.
Paola.ortiz.fr (
talk) 17:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Singapore International School, Mumbai.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:46, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Dear @ Robertsky:,
I'm not sure whether you will be the one reviewing this article or not, but I wanted to write in any case. Regarding your kind previous help with reviewing my draft article – see the archived discussion here – I have now divided the article into two: one for the book and one for the concept in general. I have also put serious effort into writing in a more encyclopaedic style. Naturally, this overhaul has entailed a lot of re-writing, shortening and restructuring. (And upon publication, I would add the book cover art and get the de-orphan and redirect stuff up and running.) As you and others pointed out, it was worth it! The result is much better and more useful for readers. I really feel like these articles can be of great benefit to people all over the world, and thanks for making that even more true.
All the best
/ Tim Isaksson ( talk) 18:07, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
The Articles for Creation Barnstar & The Teamwork Barnstar | ||
Congratulations! You have earned The Articles for Creation Barnstar and The Teamwork Barnstar for reviewing 194 drafts and doing 43 re-reviews during the
WikiProject Articles for creation
July 2021 Backlog Drive. Thank you for your work to improve Wikipedia! On behalf of WikiProject Articles for Creation, Enterprisey ( talk!) 00:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC) |
On 7 September 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Tunch Ilkin, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 22:35, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello there. Thank you for reviewing my entry on Iman Amrani. I am unsure how it reads as an advertisement. It is a collection of information about an influential young British-Algerian journalist who has contributed not only in reporting some of the biggest events in Europe, Latin-America and the UK over the past four years, as well as contributing to a debate about men and mental health in an award winning series. She doesn't do many interviews because for her it's about the work, not her, as is the case of most journalists. I studied other journalists' entries before starting the biography one can be found at this link -
/info/en/?search=Maggie_O%27Kane - and wrote to that template. After your review I have added more external links of other interviews she has done as a result of her most recent work. I am unsure what else to add given that the wealth and diversity of the work she continues to do for the Guardian platform and more recently for Al Jazeera. Any advice most gratefully received
Captbalbo (
talk) 16:23, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Captbalbo (
talk) 16:21, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello again. I see what you mean. Thank you for the advice. Maggie O'Kane's wasn't the only one that I accessed as research but I take your point. There aren't a lot of articles commenting Iman's work, as is the case with a lot of young journalists however I see how I should change the structure and the language. Will get to work on that right away. Thanks again Captbalbo ( talk) 14:39, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Draft in question: Draft:Hans Georg Näder
Hello Robertsky, I am stuck with my Draft. I have rewritten it and yet it is not neutral. What can I do to make it neutral and so you can accept it? Please help. – Centrereded ( talk) 01:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Wong Cho-lam's birthdate has been changed from 1980 to 1970, and this seems to be an edit made in good faith by an IP editor (doesn't seem related to the ongoing issue with birth date vandalism from Malaysian IP), and I have no way of verifying if the new date is correct. I would appreciate your assistance with this given your expertise. Thank you. Waxworker ( talk) 08:48, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello Robertsky,
Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.
Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.
At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.
There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.
Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
오리지널 반스타 | |
Thnak you for your advising my edit. 칼빈500 ( talk) 13:53, 16 September 2021 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading File:Invictus International School logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:23, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 46, July – August 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Hey your comment at Draft:Kolkatar Harry has been modified by me as per your comment I added Production and some details. I am waiting for your reply. २ तकर पेप्सी ( talk) 12:07, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Robertsky, the draft article for Jake Ejercito is passes the
WP:NBIO
AnsrieJames9 (
talk) 09:09, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Robertsky! Please accepted this article that passes the WP:GNG AnsrieJames9 ( talk) 03:27, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Yep AnsrieJames9 ( talk) 03:42, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Thanks Robertsky for your guidance, i highly appreciate your reply, as it’s much more clarity to me as new user.Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrlyn005 ( talk • contribs)
Respected Dear Sir, help us to save this page. I have high hopes from you, please save this page and don't let it get deleted if possible. According to Wikipedia's rules, if possible, I have done my own investigation and found the information on the page to be correct. expect you. Wikipedia rules are important to me. Special thanks. Personally I have no relation with this page, but I have spent a lot of time in collecting its information, if this page cannot be saved according to any rule, then finally delete this page. Thanks so much dear sir Ajit Kumar Srivastava (producer) talk 04:23, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
Dear User:Robertsky,
This is francabicon here and i would like to seek your assistance of judgement regarding the matter of my edit on three topics:
Here is my edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Malaysian_United_Indigenous_Party&oldid=1053371794
Here is my edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=United_Malays_National_Organisation&oldid=105337095
Here is my edit:
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Malaysian_Islamic_Party&oldid=1053371583
Here is the problem I've edited 3 topics of Ideology, Controversy whit assisted contribution by many members but has been taken down by this
User:Amir Noor Muhammad. I repeatedly told the user that if he has any arguments of this topic the user can talk to me about it but the user didn't just not talk to me about it and removed large chunks of our contribution of it which i don't think is fair for the people who had place an effort contribution to the new section of the page. Also adding to the fact that he had many Controversy on this talk page where the many user had criticize him for similar behaviour like that which you may check right over here:
User talk:Amir Noor Muhammad.
Also the user had written to ban me from editing with his recent revert. The reason that the user always revert my edit is that "it's not related" "personal not on party lines" which i then replied to him stating that " so long as they are part of the party their political action is related to the party" but the user still insist on reverting.
Hope you understand that i don't mind to be wrong but i would like your best judgment on what you can do to resolve this matter because those topics are with valid links and valid facts. Thank you.
hope to hear frm you soon do talk to me if you do want to know more.
User talk:Francabicon
Books & Bytes
Issue 47, September – October 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Tolaram Group logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:50, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello Robertsky. Could you please check Reza Goodary's article? It's WP:N as WP:NKICK (Fighting for WBC and WMC world title). Also references full covered WP:NWSRC. This article seems to deserve a move to WP:Mainspace. Thank you. AriaTess ( talk) 08:20, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Pls move it back thank u Jade Ping-ay ( talk) 11:56, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello editor, sequel to your initial recommendations, do check Draft:Funmilayo_Waheed-Adekojo and advise where necessary for further improvement. OLYRIDWANA ( talk) 06:15, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Many thanks. OLYRIDWANA ( talk) 14:39, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
I'll reach out to the submitter. I'm on Wikiproject Fraternities and I'm familiar with Philippine Fraternities and Sororities. Frankly, the submitter (who probably is a Gamma Delta Epsilon brother, but coming through the Draft Process, it may actually be a good thing) was quite reasonable to include the controversies, it isn't unusual, and may be one of the most likely things to actually be referencable. University of Santo Tomas is the oldest law school in the Philippines going back several centuries. If he can find third party to show membership of both of the Chief Justices of the Philippines, that would be enough on its own, but there are probably others. (And I've *definitely* seen worse drafts) Naraht ( talk) 14:50, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your contributions to Wikipedia! I've learnt a lot from you on how to edit a link! I do hope you will get fully recovered from the illness soon! Jm120791 ( talk) 16:06, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
The Patroller's Barnstar | ||
For reviewing at least 100 articles during the drive. |
Thank you for reviewing or re-reviewing 104 articles, which helped contribute to an overall 1276-article reduction in the backlog during the drive. ( t · c) buidhe 12:29, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
he is my secondary school friend, what do you mean it is a mistake. attached is a photo of me and him in secondary school, thanks. 101.78.109.225 ( talk) 17:09, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Robertsky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ho Kwong Yew, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 17:01, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Robertsky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rail Corridor (Singapore), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 23:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
On 26 December 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Poh Lip Meng, which you created and nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 16:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, please take a look at [6]. I'm unable to file a report.
PS: Huyu is Singaporean instead of Vietnamese — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6011:340:4D6:44F1:EEC5:89A8:FED5 ( talk) 00:14, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi !
You reverted some of my edits, but your external websites are not foul-proof...
-- FromZeFild ( talk) 19:19, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi! Just like to check, is there anything else to update on in Mediacorp artiste articles, just to clarify? I'm not sure if the update tag can be removed from articles like Chantalle Ng and other relevant ones. Thanks. TheGreatSG'rean ( talk) 05:46, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Robertsky!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Dan arndt (
talk) 12:18, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
|
@ Dan arndt: 🤣 – robertsky ( talk) 12:33, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Goo Hara you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shushugah -- Shushugah ( talk) 10:40, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
The article Goo Hara you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Goo Hara for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shushugah -- Shushugah ( talk) 21:41, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Robertsky, based on your contribution in Goh Jin Wei article, i have some suggestion about cite web template:
I hope this will be useful for your next edits. Thank you. Stvbastian ( talk) 11:27, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
language=en
, I don't see any documentation that it shouldn't be used. Even if it is used, I don't see any rendering issues?
– robertsky (
talk) 22:25, 23 January 2022 (UTC)On 24 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Goo Hara, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after Goo Hara's mother abandoned her and Goo died young, South Korean law was changed to prevent such parents from claiming inheritance? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Goo Hara. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Goo Hara), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 00:03, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 48, November – December 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Can this count as proof that it can go to main space? https://news.abs-cbn.com/entertainment/02/04/22/look-lovi-poe-shares-first-glimpse-of-flower-of-evil — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.54.102.0 ( talk) 11:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)