![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 75 | ← | Archive 79 | Archive 80 | Archive 81 | Archive 82 | Archive 83 | → | Archive 85 |
Changing IP repeatedly removing sourced content. May require protection? Thanks. Martinevans123 ( talk) 12:52, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Hiya. Can you also salt Jaiden Animations as it's been repeatedly re-created. -- Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 17:06, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2 up 2 down with central staircase.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B ( talk) 19:08, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
climate change supporters...I just imagine angry people with signs protesting the EPA yelling "Yeah! Screw Tuvalu! That's what they get for being a low lying island nation! More climate change!" GMG talk 13:11, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
I suspect the Mjolnir + Pants logo might want to be copyrightable.Naah. The runes are just elder furthark, and the hammer is taken from File:Mjollnir.png which is PD.
Yet still, if you can explicitly license something freely, you should, rather than relying on a legal standard that itself may change.I tend to agree. This is one of the reasons why I release my own work into the public domain when I upload it here. Sure, the CC-by-SA is good enough, but under that license, the creator still owns the copyright, and might not consider the tiny text "courtesy of Wikipedia" at the bottom of your page to be sufficient attribution and sue. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 13:23, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
"Does that little house really have two kitchens and no bathroom?" There's only one kitchen, but yes, in 1900 a typical working-class terrace house had one cold tap, an outside toilet was luxury, for more basic places you made do with an outhouse that got "empties" collected by a horse and cart (that's why there's always a connecting lane at the back of the houses), and no bathroom (you put a tin bath in the lounge, and filled it with pots of water heated on a coal fire). All outlawed by the 1950s after way too many cholera-related deaths. If you look at a run of old terraced houses, ( random example) every one has had a bathroom retro-fitted on the back (houses are now legally required to have a bathroom, but the law doesn't say how it should be designed). So yes, Americans, downstairs bathrooms are far more common over here than you may think. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:49, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
...downstairs bathrooms...<shudders> And they say you Brits are the civilized ones... I refuse to take more than 5 steps (with no more than 1 of them being up or down) from my bed before I expect to find a toilet in front of me. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 12:42, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
I am inclined to ask as to how Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rozlyn Khan was a NC? Post the relist by V93, both me and Saqib agreed that the coverage was not sufficient to muster passage of GNG/NACTOR.So, I'm a bit perplexed...... ∯WBG converse 15:03, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Typical gossip-style-coverageis about the quality of sourcing, (as argued by GSS and Sakib).So, WP:RUBBISH is a non-starter.(I agree with that and seldom mention it as a stand-alone deletion-reason, ever),And, I regret for not making myself clear-enough.
The article
Led Zeppelin (album) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Led Zeppelin (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk) 21:41, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
I believe that you misinterpreted the consensus at this AFD. In my opinion, it should have been relisted in any case rather than closed, because there was no clear consensus over keep by way of merge or deleting, and the keep votes didn't make strong cases. Also, no one suggested a redirect, so why was that the closing consensus? Etzedek24 ( I'll talk at ya) ( Check my track record) 15:39, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Hey Ritchie, unfortunately, the article you recently nominated for DYK ( Led Zeppelin (album)) has previously been listed on the On This Day section of the main page. Per DYK rules, it is therefore ineligible to appear on the DYK section.-- White Shadows Let’s Talk 04:16, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Hey there. I created the Aughlisnafin GAC page to mark my local football club, but you deleted it. Fair enough - it didn't have a lot of content (yet).
However, → Almost every club in my county has a page, and Aughlisnafin GAC should be no different → There are plenty of local historians in the Aughlisnafin area, and plenty of historical emigration too, meaning plenty of ad hoc interest.
I would like the page to be restored so I can input more information about it, as well as the local area in general.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Billdoesjudo ( talk • contribs) 09:42, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
Disruptive editing by User:CheekyboyOli.
— bieχχ (
talk) 16:47, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
On 5 September 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Rachael Bland, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 17:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie333. Regarding this edit, wouldn't we have the diffs of the legal threats as evidence if this issue were ever taken to WP:ANI? Legal threats on the talk page were already removed on four separate occasions:
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
Thanks for being an admin who seems to genuinely care about WP (noted especially after your contribs to AfD discussions and reading your user page)! Redditaddict 6 9 22:01, 6 September 2018 (UTC) |
First of all, out of 14 support for block, there were 8 votes for siteban/indef ban (same things) since 2 indef blocks have been already applied on his past accounts before. Either way it is WP:CBAN and should be stated that way. Secondly your message on his talk page, [1] shows that he can be unblocked by any admin contrary to WP:CBAN which is appealed only to the community. Please fix this and also fix the blocking rational in the block log. Accesscrawl ( talk) 10:23, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
WP:CBAN: "Editors who are or remain indefinitely blocked after due consideration by the community are considered "banned by the Wikipedia community"." This shouldn't be treated as a normal admin action, especially when over a dozen of editors in good standing supported indef block or siteban. Accesscrawl ( talk) 10:31, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Opened for review now: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Issues with closure. GenuineArt ( talk) 12:15, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie333: You closed this deletion discussion as delete, but did not delete the article. North America 1000 13:23, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Tyranny imposed
You people don't realise it. These people like DBigXray, Lorstaking, Accesscrawl are eliminating their Pakistani opponents like me to spread their agenda. They done the same to NadirAli who is in a long line of list they've done it to. Many of the people in their group have been blocked in past for various reasons including socking. Accesscrawl is already suspected of socking.
Give Ivanvector's claims about Fram being aggressive, you should take their admin priveleges. Also RaviC
harassed Ivan and Simonm223 over their friendship, which had already been discolsed years earlier and Simonm223's editing with Ivanvector's account as an accident. If someone's involved in meatpuppetry it is these people who had Nauriya and NadirAli banned because they show up everywhere including
University of Chicago Law School where 1990'sguy and Accesscrawl supported Lostaking. Another opponent they have endlessly targeted is
User:Son of Kolachi with
SPI by Sdmarathe (who supported banning NadirAli) and strong claims of DUCK by DBigXray and Accesscrawl. Lorstaking continued to claim he was a sock of another user on Abecedare's talk page. Have a look yourself.
These people will start uttering they're being targeted with bad faith but don't hestitate to have bad faith on others themselves. They clearly don't come to support each other by coincidence and are doing nothing except trying to take control. Can you take any action against them or will this keep going on like a circus?
Glitcher1 (
talk) 16:21, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
And don't listen to these people, they'll want that reports against them are removed or not paid attention to so their behaviour can continue.
Glitcher1 (
talk) 16:43, 7 September 2018 (UTC) harassment Sock now blocked
::::
Richie333, re improving
The House of Fine Art, this may be useful. Although slightly puzzling, as this claims to be the first to use crypto-currency..[
[3]].
Irondome (
talk) 17:56, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
This [
[4]] may be more useful.
Irondome (
talk) 18:18, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I want to ask you why you deleted the article "Naveen Bawa" inspite of adding sources which prove its notability? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Helpful14 ( talk • contribs) 05:04, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
I see our antipodean belching friend has now branched out into some incredibly cunning and deceptive sock puppetry. Yours AuntieJean123 ( talk) 11:07, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
I roll my eyes
At all the socking (wooah-oah)
They all need blocking (wooah-oah)
Page protection too
I see that good sense and justice has now prevailed. Martinevans123 ( talk) 13:36, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
![]() | On 9 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Charro outfit, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that in 1985, someone made a charro outfit out of pull tabs from 2,500 aluminum cans? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Charro outfit. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
You closed it as no consensus. There was agreed that the page should be either merged, redirected or deleted. First keep voter User:duffbeerforme said it was OK to merge, because it does not meet GNG in this state. The other vote was a WP:PERX vote by a person who always votes keep. I think the appropiate closure here is to merge it into Tchukon. » Shadowowl | talk 09:37, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
With due respect, but I'm considering a request for a deletion review, because I believe the "no consensus" was not justified. -- Saqib ( talk) 15:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie333. I recently created Luitpoldpark. However after reading the geographical notability essay I’m beginning to have doubts that this park is notable. What do you think? I personally would like to see this article stay and be developed, but I welcome your experienced view. Mr Ernie ( talk) 01:33, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi.
I recently created
Alright Now (film). The "Alright Now" in title is being shown in italics (but not the "(film)"). I was why this is happening. Do you have any ideas? TPS are also welcome to discuss. —usernamekiran
(talk) 19:20, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
~ Rob13 Talk 21:15, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Greetings. You closed that AfD with a "no consensus" decision. Yet there was only one dissenting suggestion against two opposite ones. Moreover, you justified the closing with this: "Since the pre-copyvio version was restored, nobody has commented on a definitive option for the article." However, after Michig restored the pre-copyvio version, I commented extensively on the sources Michig provided, as well as other sources out there, and I believe I refuted all claims for notability. So, it's surprising to see the proposal closed like this. Do you think the closing should be somewhat revisited? - The Gnome ( talk) 15:30, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
I was just wondering if you were at all familiar with this 2003 classic? A real treat for dub-wise Floydians everywhere (and full available on YouTube, of course, in case folks are curious). It's pretty cosmic. Martinevans123 ( talk) 20:18, 11 September 2018 (UTC) widdly-diddly
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly
tickle a fellow Wikipedian, as you did at
this madhouse.
Martinevans123 (
talk) 13:40, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 75 | ← | Archive 79 | Archive 80 | Archive 81 | Archive 82 | Archive 83 | → | Archive 85 |
Changing IP repeatedly removing sourced content. May require protection? Thanks. Martinevans123 ( talk) 12:52, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Hiya. Can you also salt Jaiden Animations as it's been repeatedly re-created. -- Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 17:06, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2 up 2 down with central staircase.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B ( talk) 19:08, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
climate change supporters...I just imagine angry people with signs protesting the EPA yelling "Yeah! Screw Tuvalu! That's what they get for being a low lying island nation! More climate change!" GMG talk 13:11, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
I suspect the Mjolnir + Pants logo might want to be copyrightable.Naah. The runes are just elder furthark, and the hammer is taken from File:Mjollnir.png which is PD.
Yet still, if you can explicitly license something freely, you should, rather than relying on a legal standard that itself may change.I tend to agree. This is one of the reasons why I release my own work into the public domain when I upload it here. Sure, the CC-by-SA is good enough, but under that license, the creator still owns the copyright, and might not consider the tiny text "courtesy of Wikipedia" at the bottom of your page to be sufficient attribution and sue. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 13:23, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
"Does that little house really have two kitchens and no bathroom?" There's only one kitchen, but yes, in 1900 a typical working-class terrace house had one cold tap, an outside toilet was luxury, for more basic places you made do with an outhouse that got "empties" collected by a horse and cart (that's why there's always a connecting lane at the back of the houses), and no bathroom (you put a tin bath in the lounge, and filled it with pots of water heated on a coal fire). All outlawed by the 1950s after way too many cholera-related deaths. If you look at a run of old terraced houses, ( random example) every one has had a bathroom retro-fitted on the back (houses are now legally required to have a bathroom, but the law doesn't say how it should be designed). So yes, Americans, downstairs bathrooms are far more common over here than you may think. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:49, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
...downstairs bathrooms...<shudders> And they say you Brits are the civilized ones... I refuse to take more than 5 steps (with no more than 1 of them being up or down) from my bed before I expect to find a toilet in front of me. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 12:42, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
I am inclined to ask as to how Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rozlyn Khan was a NC? Post the relist by V93, both me and Saqib agreed that the coverage was not sufficient to muster passage of GNG/NACTOR.So, I'm a bit perplexed...... ∯WBG converse 15:03, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Typical gossip-style-coverageis about the quality of sourcing, (as argued by GSS and Sakib).So, WP:RUBBISH is a non-starter.(I agree with that and seldom mention it as a stand-alone deletion-reason, ever),And, I regret for not making myself clear-enough.
The article
Led Zeppelin (album) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Led Zeppelin (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk) 21:41, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
I believe that you misinterpreted the consensus at this AFD. In my opinion, it should have been relisted in any case rather than closed, because there was no clear consensus over keep by way of merge or deleting, and the keep votes didn't make strong cases. Also, no one suggested a redirect, so why was that the closing consensus? Etzedek24 ( I'll talk at ya) ( Check my track record) 15:39, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Hey Ritchie, unfortunately, the article you recently nominated for DYK ( Led Zeppelin (album)) has previously been listed on the On This Day section of the main page. Per DYK rules, it is therefore ineligible to appear on the DYK section.-- White Shadows Let’s Talk 04:16, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Hey there. I created the Aughlisnafin GAC page to mark my local football club, but you deleted it. Fair enough - it didn't have a lot of content (yet).
However, → Almost every club in my county has a page, and Aughlisnafin GAC should be no different → There are plenty of local historians in the Aughlisnafin area, and plenty of historical emigration too, meaning plenty of ad hoc interest.
I would like the page to be restored so I can input more information about it, as well as the local area in general.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Billdoesjudo ( talk • contribs) 09:42, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
Disruptive editing by User:CheekyboyOli.
— bieχχ (
talk) 16:47, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
On 5 September 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Rachael Bland, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 17:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie333. Regarding this edit, wouldn't we have the diffs of the legal threats as evidence if this issue were ever taken to WP:ANI? Legal threats on the talk page were already removed on four separate occasions:
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
Thanks for being an admin who seems to genuinely care about WP (noted especially after your contribs to AfD discussions and reading your user page)! Redditaddict 6 9 22:01, 6 September 2018 (UTC) |
First of all, out of 14 support for block, there were 8 votes for siteban/indef ban (same things) since 2 indef blocks have been already applied on his past accounts before. Either way it is WP:CBAN and should be stated that way. Secondly your message on his talk page, [1] shows that he can be unblocked by any admin contrary to WP:CBAN which is appealed only to the community. Please fix this and also fix the blocking rational in the block log. Accesscrawl ( talk) 10:23, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
WP:CBAN: "Editors who are or remain indefinitely blocked after due consideration by the community are considered "banned by the Wikipedia community"." This shouldn't be treated as a normal admin action, especially when over a dozen of editors in good standing supported indef block or siteban. Accesscrawl ( talk) 10:31, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Opened for review now: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Issues with closure. GenuineArt ( talk) 12:15, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie333: You closed this deletion discussion as delete, but did not delete the article. North America 1000 13:23, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Tyranny imposed
You people don't realise it. These people like DBigXray, Lorstaking, Accesscrawl are eliminating their Pakistani opponents like me to spread their agenda. They done the same to NadirAli who is in a long line of list they've done it to. Many of the people in their group have been blocked in past for various reasons including socking. Accesscrawl is already suspected of socking.
Give Ivanvector's claims about Fram being aggressive, you should take their admin priveleges. Also RaviC
harassed Ivan and Simonm223 over their friendship, which had already been discolsed years earlier and Simonm223's editing with Ivanvector's account as an accident. If someone's involved in meatpuppetry it is these people who had Nauriya and NadirAli banned because they show up everywhere including
University of Chicago Law School where 1990'sguy and Accesscrawl supported Lostaking. Another opponent they have endlessly targeted is
User:Son of Kolachi with
SPI by Sdmarathe (who supported banning NadirAli) and strong claims of DUCK by DBigXray and Accesscrawl. Lorstaking continued to claim he was a sock of another user on Abecedare's talk page. Have a look yourself.
These people will start uttering they're being targeted with bad faith but don't hestitate to have bad faith on others themselves. They clearly don't come to support each other by coincidence and are doing nothing except trying to take control. Can you take any action against them or will this keep going on like a circus?
Glitcher1 (
talk) 16:21, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
And don't listen to these people, they'll want that reports against them are removed or not paid attention to so their behaviour can continue.
Glitcher1 (
talk) 16:43, 7 September 2018 (UTC) harassment Sock now blocked
::::
Richie333, re improving
The House of Fine Art, this may be useful. Although slightly puzzling, as this claims to be the first to use crypto-currency..[
[3]].
Irondome (
talk) 17:56, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
This [
[4]] may be more useful.
Irondome (
talk) 18:18, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I want to ask you why you deleted the article "Naveen Bawa" inspite of adding sources which prove its notability? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Helpful14 ( talk • contribs) 05:04, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
I see our antipodean belching friend has now branched out into some incredibly cunning and deceptive sock puppetry. Yours AuntieJean123 ( talk) 11:07, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
I roll my eyes
At all the socking (wooah-oah)
They all need blocking (wooah-oah)
Page protection too
I see that good sense and justice has now prevailed. Martinevans123 ( talk) 13:36, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
![]() | On 9 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Charro outfit, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that in 1985, someone made a charro outfit out of pull tabs from 2,500 aluminum cans? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Charro outfit. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
You closed it as no consensus. There was agreed that the page should be either merged, redirected or deleted. First keep voter User:duffbeerforme said it was OK to merge, because it does not meet GNG in this state. The other vote was a WP:PERX vote by a person who always votes keep. I think the appropiate closure here is to merge it into Tchukon. » Shadowowl | talk 09:37, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
With due respect, but I'm considering a request for a deletion review, because I believe the "no consensus" was not justified. -- Saqib ( talk) 15:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie333. I recently created Luitpoldpark. However after reading the geographical notability essay I’m beginning to have doubts that this park is notable. What do you think? I personally would like to see this article stay and be developed, but I welcome your experienced view. Mr Ernie ( talk) 01:33, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi.
I recently created
Alright Now (film). The "Alright Now" in title is being shown in italics (but not the "(film)"). I was why this is happening. Do you have any ideas? TPS are also welcome to discuss. —usernamekiran
(talk) 19:20, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
~ Rob13 Talk 21:15, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Greetings. You closed that AfD with a "no consensus" decision. Yet there was only one dissenting suggestion against two opposite ones. Moreover, you justified the closing with this: "Since the pre-copyvio version was restored, nobody has commented on a definitive option for the article." However, after Michig restored the pre-copyvio version, I commented extensively on the sources Michig provided, as well as other sources out there, and I believe I refuted all claims for notability. So, it's surprising to see the proposal closed like this. Do you think the closing should be somewhat revisited? - The Gnome ( talk) 15:30, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
I was just wondering if you were at all familiar with this 2003 classic? A real treat for dub-wise Floydians everywhere (and full available on YouTube, of course, in case folks are curious). It's pretty cosmic. Martinevans123 ( talk) 20:18, 11 September 2018 (UTC) widdly-diddly
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly
tickle a fellow Wikipedian, as you did at
this madhouse.
Martinevans123 (
talk) 13:40, 12 September 2018 (UTC)