![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 35 | ← | Archive 40 | Archive 41 | Archive 42 | Archive 43 | Archive 44 | Archive 45 |
On 14 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pentonville Road, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the perpetrators of a major burglary were caught after discussing it in a Pentonville Road pub? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pentonville Road. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Pentonville Road), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass ( talk) 00:01, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
hi ritchie333, I would love to be in touch with the person who wrote the article. I find communication on wikipedia very confusing which has prohibited me following up.
If she/he works at the guggenheim, they can track down my contact information or contact my gallery 47 canal.
At the very least I would like to have the way my work is described changed. It is incorrect in summary and I am the authority on my work. I would do this myself but at the moment it will take me too long to figure out how.
thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ma343678 ( talk • contribs) 01:12, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Ritchie, I know you know your music, so I'd like to draw your attention to a discussion on the " Bohemian Rhapsody" page about the genre. An IP recently removed a sourced genre and replaced it with an unsourced genre of rock opera, which I reverted because we had sources for all the existing genres. My revert was itself then reverted. I say rock opera is not a genre, it's a type of album (for example Tommy, Quadrophenia which I know you will know well from your work on The Who). It doesn't apply accurately to Bohemian Rhapsody, which is a song with operatic elements in it (which is something quite different). My research has found articles which support this ( http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2011/11/the-who-made-the-best-rock-opera-ever-but-its-not-the-one-you-think/248431/ "The mere undertaking of such an album—which typically sprawls to a double or triple set—is enough to fire the imagination of anyone in search of a recording that's more than a mere collection of songs" and this http://uk.ign.com/articles/top-14-greatest-rock-operasconcept-albums-of-all-time) which clearly state that a rock opera is akin to a concept album and is not an indivdual song. Please let me know your thoughts on the Talk page. Thanks. Rodericksilly ( talk) 15:02, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. In reference to this edit, isn't a database listing (not a review) on AllMusic just as unremarkable as an IMDb listing for a film or a listing in the phone book for a person? Largoplazo ( talk) 20:09, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Regarding that ani. Posting here as well. Apparently, some experienced editors have found a nice loophole on how to ban any editor they wish. Your ISP uses a certain range of ip addresses. For instance mine uses several ranges, one being 89.164.xxx.xxx. Apparently, the only thing that is needed to block a person is to accuse him of being a sock of someone who uses the same ISP. Then they both will have the same ip prefix and appear they are the same person. I still haven't figured out the way they find ip behind a username. However, requesting cu until a suitable candidate is found can work, especially if a suitable candidate had used several isps. I come from Croatia where User:Asdisis is that candidate. There are only a few isps in Croatia so it's not hard to ban a lot of people as socks. Here's how to ban someone. The discussion [1]. The user that you want to ban [2]. The repeated cu requests outside spi [3]. Other cases that I had caught [4]-> [5] My case: I'm being forbidden to post sources: [6] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.164.143.178 ( talk) 15:31, 31 July 2016 (UTC) In fact, I know one way to get someone's ip. Cu editors can see it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.164.143.178 ( talk) 15:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
I notice you censored a viewpoint you don't like. Please do not comment on this discussion further. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Bow Street you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MWright96 --
MWright96 (
talk)
12:20, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
The article
Bow Street you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Bow Street for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MWright96 --
MWright96 (
talk)
14:20, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
The article
Bow Street you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Bow Street for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MWright96 --
MWright96 (
talk)
11:21, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello Ritchie333 Like you indicate, the article needs a rewrite. And I want to be sure every thing is ok before start. Deiros published many articles refereed journals, that are used in the bibliography of other articles and thesis of geosciences and engineering. Gave classes at a university institute in Caracas, but he appears also in scientific publications as part of the Simon Bolivar University and also as tutor engineering in thesis at the University of the Andes. Although I have understood, his primary job is not academic in nature but he is also known for their academic achievements, like the measure the Pico Bolivar altitude, the highest peak in Venezuela with other two geoscientists climber collaborator. This single research has made significant impact, because before this, the peak measured had not been achieved, even after many attempts for nearly a century. Also he is notable for their primary job. In the Houston geophysical society is referred as part of the company Fugro and some students went to a private laboratory of his property that had assembled for processing and interpreting seismic data. There was a group of engineers working, the interesting thing it is that at that time were pioneers in data processing using free software Linux. They were working in a geo-hazards study for ConocoPhillips using seismic data. Please let me know if this is OK to rewrite the article? Best Regards Biographer1950 ( talk) 19:51, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
M32 motorway you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk)
17:20, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie333, I created the page ICON Engineering Pty Ltd under List_of_oilfield_service_companies list and I'd like to recover the work I've done and continue working on it, with a view to getting this company and a few other company omissions on this important list. The list is important but has lots of omissions. The log says you deleted the page. Further, the instructions on creating a replacement page say I should contact you before creating ICON Engineering Pty Ltd. it says quote "A page with this title has previously been moved or deleted. If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the user(s) who performed the action(s) listed below. 17:36, 2 August 2016 Ritchie333 (talk | contribs) deleted page ICON Engineering Pty Ltd (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)" I'll get some help form editors, etc.. as this list is really poor. Can you point me to a place where I can recover my deleted work? John21rope ( talk) 15:56, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
I'm not going mad, am I? Adam9007 ( talk) 18:44, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Speaking personally, User:Ritchie333/MOS for Dummies describes the thought processes in my head perfectly :-) Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:52, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Can I ask what made you think that the Guerilla Cricket page was a "blatant hoax"?
As one of the very few (maybe only one of two) broadcasters of cricket commentary around the world, and a spin off from Test Match Sofa (which has a page!), what made you think that there was nothing genuine about the page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oraclematt ( talk • contribs) 14:58, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Come over to http://tunein.com/radio/Guerilla-Cricket-s225655/ to get an idea of whether Guerilla Cricket's real or not.
Your deletion of the Guerilla Cricket page for being a "blatant hoax" is a peculiar decision. The site and its cricket coverage are very real and used regularly by many affectionate listeners. The page had a number of citations and references in place and was expanding rapidly. Checking any one of those links or references would have made the "hoax" case very hard to support. Restoring it to a draft at the very least would be welcome. Best wishes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spinesideburn ( talk • contribs) 15:04, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Excellent, thanks :) There is an article in the Spectator about GC (I think it was linked in the old text) - we're all a bit new to this! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oraclematt ( talk • contribs) 15:12, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Yes, thank you. I appreciate the article was a work in progress, but isn't everything to one degree or another? Your edits will be very welcome. Spinesideburn ( talk) 15:16, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Several listeners to the station Guerilla Cricket believe that the newly created wiki page of the same name. the reqason given is that they are 'a blatant hoax'. this is wholly untrue. A simple visit to http://www.guerillacricket.com/ will show you this page is not a hoax. not only that you can also tune in and listen to the commentary live during England games. Thripweed ( talk) 15:13, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Go over to http://tunein.com/radio/Guerilla-Cricket-s225655/ to listen to these guys live on Tunein. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gonnawreckyourmom ( talk • contribs) 15:17, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi - can I ask why you've removed the information box from the page? What references do I need to put in there to keep it in place. I used the Test Match Sofa box as a template, put in the correct information, but you've removed it from the page. What should I include to prevent it from being removed again? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oraclematt ( talk • contribs) 10:22, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The current infobox is pathetic. Everything contained within it can be found in the lead section:
So in light of that, I don't see the point of it. Cassianto Talk 18:42, 4 August 2016 (UTC) Website guerillacricket.com
OK, so let's compare the original infobox (now deleted) with the one on Test Match Sofa (still there). "Test Match Sofa was a radio programme providing cricket commentary for all England test matches[2] and selected One Day Internationals." - so someone should remove the "Genre" and "Running Time" (which conflicts the first line) from the info box. The "Producers" field should be removed because it's uncredited and is unsubstantiated (not in any of the referenced articles, not in the Wiki page). So that would leave the country (possibly - surely it's obvious from the text that Tooting Bec, Nunhead and South London are in the UK), language, creators and audio format. The infobox for Test Match Sofa adds very little to the article, so is someone going to remove it from there as well, or just remove the redundant fields? I'm sure there are plenty of other examples that one could find where the infobox is (to some people) irrelevant, and to others provides a handy precis of the key information. Ho hum. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oraclematt ( talk • contribs) 21:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Richie, I don't understand your decision to delete the edit I posted yesterday. The original parts which I removed were inaccurate and/or irrelevant. For example, the statement that they had "not managed to gain interviews from professional English cricketers" is clearly wrong, and the list of guest which I included, instead of the single guest previously cited, included several such cricketers. Midsomer ( talk) 06:19, 8 August 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Midsomer ( talk • contribs) 01:24, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Richie, while the citation referred to is correct, the words used do not reflect the content of the cited article. The statement "Though it has not managed to gain interviews from professional English cricketers", is not a reflection of the quote you used above. Current English Test players have not appeared on GC, nor do I believe such appearances have been sought, but several other professional cricketers have. The reference to the actions of the Cricketer Magazine failing to seize The Sky viewing card, while mildly amusing, is hardly relevant or useful, and the reference to just one guest is far better placed in a more comprehensive list of guests. As far as that list is concerned, it is never going to be possible to provide a citation for such a list, unless you want a copy of the PM I received from Nigel Henderson, one of the co-hosts/founders, in response to my request for him to provide such a list. I will endeavour to do an edit citing the Spectator article in a more accurate manner. Midsomer ( talk) 20:00, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
PS - Just read Zen and the art of W Maintenance - Thoroughly enjoyed it! Thank you :) Midsomer ( talk) 06:19, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
The article
M32 motorway you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:M32 motorway for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk)
21:21, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:M32 Bristol.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 18:05, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. I tried to expand this but couldn't find enough even for a destub. Perhaps it would be best to merge it and some of the other landmarks which have little info available into the King Street, Bristol article and develop the main article? Rodw? Perhaps you'd be interested in expanding the street.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:44, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Been to Colston Hall many times, it's one of Britain's most notable rock venues! On King Street some buildings are more notable than others. I think we need to decide which ones to merge. Something like 16 King Street at best should be a small section/paragraph in the street article.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Just looking quickly I would probably think it would be best to merge all of the number address ones into it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:17, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Portway, Bristol you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk)
17:20, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The article
Portway, Bristol you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Portway, Bristol for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk)
21:41, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello dear Ritchie333,, I need your helpless: you must protect and save the article Nikolai Noskov! If you saved this article, I will for you grateful! Thank you! -- Anna Jarvinen ( talk) 10:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Tamar Bridge you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk)
09:00, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
The article
Tamar Bridge you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Tamar Bridge for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk)
11:21, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Ritchie, the IP has gone straight back into the edit war without bothering about the talk page again. BTW, I sent you an email yesterday about an RfC. Cheers - SchroCat ( talk) 07:00, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
I'm pleased to inform you that you won't be getting any more notices about
Tamar Bridge, which you nominated as a
good article.
E
Eng
22:14, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Just to clarify that the last notice you got about
Tamar Bridge, which you nominated as a
good article, was the absolutely last notice you were going to get, except of course this notice. This is the end for sure.
E
Eng
22:14, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Go jump in the Tamar. Did you know that the Cornish on the sign halfway across the Tamar Bridge means "here be dragons"? Or perhaps it's "Kelly's vanilla with flake, please?" Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 07:10, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
On 14 August 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article M32 motorway, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 2011, a field of red poppies, cornflowers, and marigolds was planted alongside the M32 motorway in Bristol to improve the view? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/M32 motorway. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, M32 motorway), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 12:01, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Ritchie333,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Kelly's of Cornwall should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly's of Cornwall .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 10:38, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.. Also, I believe JJE refers to me. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:51, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
A few additional articles that may be of use. Cheers - SchroCat ( talk) 10:50, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
The Kelly's of Cornwall message is the second Westcountry-related thing I've seen pop up on your talk page recently, which has got me thinking you might be from down that way? -- samtar talk or stalk 19:59, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Fenchurch Street railway station you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Miyagawa --
Miyagawa (
talk)
11:01, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
The article
Fenchurch Street railway station you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Fenchurch Street railway station for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Miyagawa --
Miyagawa (
talk)
13:40, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 35 | ← | Archive 40 | Archive 41 | Archive 42 | Archive 43 | Archive 44 | Archive 45 |
On 14 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pentonville Road, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the perpetrators of a major burglary were caught after discussing it in a Pentonville Road pub? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pentonville Road. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Pentonville Road), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass ( talk) 00:01, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
hi ritchie333, I would love to be in touch with the person who wrote the article. I find communication on wikipedia very confusing which has prohibited me following up.
If she/he works at the guggenheim, they can track down my contact information or contact my gallery 47 canal.
At the very least I would like to have the way my work is described changed. It is incorrect in summary and I am the authority on my work. I would do this myself but at the moment it will take me too long to figure out how.
thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ma343678 ( talk • contribs) 01:12, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Ritchie, I know you know your music, so I'd like to draw your attention to a discussion on the " Bohemian Rhapsody" page about the genre. An IP recently removed a sourced genre and replaced it with an unsourced genre of rock opera, which I reverted because we had sources for all the existing genres. My revert was itself then reverted. I say rock opera is not a genre, it's a type of album (for example Tommy, Quadrophenia which I know you will know well from your work on The Who). It doesn't apply accurately to Bohemian Rhapsody, which is a song with operatic elements in it (which is something quite different). My research has found articles which support this ( http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2011/11/the-who-made-the-best-rock-opera-ever-but-its-not-the-one-you-think/248431/ "The mere undertaking of such an album—which typically sprawls to a double or triple set—is enough to fire the imagination of anyone in search of a recording that's more than a mere collection of songs" and this http://uk.ign.com/articles/top-14-greatest-rock-operasconcept-albums-of-all-time) which clearly state that a rock opera is akin to a concept album and is not an indivdual song. Please let me know your thoughts on the Talk page. Thanks. Rodericksilly ( talk) 15:02, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. In reference to this edit, isn't a database listing (not a review) on AllMusic just as unremarkable as an IMDb listing for a film or a listing in the phone book for a person? Largoplazo ( talk) 20:09, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Regarding that ani. Posting here as well. Apparently, some experienced editors have found a nice loophole on how to ban any editor they wish. Your ISP uses a certain range of ip addresses. For instance mine uses several ranges, one being 89.164.xxx.xxx. Apparently, the only thing that is needed to block a person is to accuse him of being a sock of someone who uses the same ISP. Then they both will have the same ip prefix and appear they are the same person. I still haven't figured out the way they find ip behind a username. However, requesting cu until a suitable candidate is found can work, especially if a suitable candidate had used several isps. I come from Croatia where User:Asdisis is that candidate. There are only a few isps in Croatia so it's not hard to ban a lot of people as socks. Here's how to ban someone. The discussion [1]. The user that you want to ban [2]. The repeated cu requests outside spi [3]. Other cases that I had caught [4]-> [5] My case: I'm being forbidden to post sources: [6] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.164.143.178 ( talk) 15:31, 31 July 2016 (UTC) In fact, I know one way to get someone's ip. Cu editors can see it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.164.143.178 ( talk) 15:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
I notice you censored a viewpoint you don't like. Please do not comment on this discussion further. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Bow Street you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MWright96 --
MWright96 (
talk)
12:20, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
The article
Bow Street you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Bow Street for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MWright96 --
MWright96 (
talk)
14:20, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
The article
Bow Street you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Bow Street for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MWright96 --
MWright96 (
talk)
11:21, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello Ritchie333 Like you indicate, the article needs a rewrite. And I want to be sure every thing is ok before start. Deiros published many articles refereed journals, that are used in the bibliography of other articles and thesis of geosciences and engineering. Gave classes at a university institute in Caracas, but he appears also in scientific publications as part of the Simon Bolivar University and also as tutor engineering in thesis at the University of the Andes. Although I have understood, his primary job is not academic in nature but he is also known for their academic achievements, like the measure the Pico Bolivar altitude, the highest peak in Venezuela with other two geoscientists climber collaborator. This single research has made significant impact, because before this, the peak measured had not been achieved, even after many attempts for nearly a century. Also he is notable for their primary job. In the Houston geophysical society is referred as part of the company Fugro and some students went to a private laboratory of his property that had assembled for processing and interpreting seismic data. There was a group of engineers working, the interesting thing it is that at that time were pioneers in data processing using free software Linux. They were working in a geo-hazards study for ConocoPhillips using seismic data. Please let me know if this is OK to rewrite the article? Best Regards Biographer1950 ( talk) 19:51, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
M32 motorway you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk)
17:20, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie333, I created the page ICON Engineering Pty Ltd under List_of_oilfield_service_companies list and I'd like to recover the work I've done and continue working on it, with a view to getting this company and a few other company omissions on this important list. The list is important but has lots of omissions. The log says you deleted the page. Further, the instructions on creating a replacement page say I should contact you before creating ICON Engineering Pty Ltd. it says quote "A page with this title has previously been moved or deleted. If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the user(s) who performed the action(s) listed below. 17:36, 2 August 2016 Ritchie333 (talk | contribs) deleted page ICON Engineering Pty Ltd (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)" I'll get some help form editors, etc.. as this list is really poor. Can you point me to a place where I can recover my deleted work? John21rope ( talk) 15:56, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
I'm not going mad, am I? Adam9007 ( talk) 18:44, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Speaking personally, User:Ritchie333/MOS for Dummies describes the thought processes in my head perfectly :-) Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:52, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Can I ask what made you think that the Guerilla Cricket page was a "blatant hoax"?
As one of the very few (maybe only one of two) broadcasters of cricket commentary around the world, and a spin off from Test Match Sofa (which has a page!), what made you think that there was nothing genuine about the page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oraclematt ( talk • contribs) 14:58, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Come over to http://tunein.com/radio/Guerilla-Cricket-s225655/ to get an idea of whether Guerilla Cricket's real or not.
Your deletion of the Guerilla Cricket page for being a "blatant hoax" is a peculiar decision. The site and its cricket coverage are very real and used regularly by many affectionate listeners. The page had a number of citations and references in place and was expanding rapidly. Checking any one of those links or references would have made the "hoax" case very hard to support. Restoring it to a draft at the very least would be welcome. Best wishes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spinesideburn ( talk • contribs) 15:04, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Excellent, thanks :) There is an article in the Spectator about GC (I think it was linked in the old text) - we're all a bit new to this! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oraclematt ( talk • contribs) 15:12, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Yes, thank you. I appreciate the article was a work in progress, but isn't everything to one degree or another? Your edits will be very welcome. Spinesideburn ( talk) 15:16, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Several listeners to the station Guerilla Cricket believe that the newly created wiki page of the same name. the reqason given is that they are 'a blatant hoax'. this is wholly untrue. A simple visit to http://www.guerillacricket.com/ will show you this page is not a hoax. not only that you can also tune in and listen to the commentary live during England games. Thripweed ( talk) 15:13, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Go over to http://tunein.com/radio/Guerilla-Cricket-s225655/ to listen to these guys live on Tunein. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gonnawreckyourmom ( talk • contribs) 15:17, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi - can I ask why you've removed the information box from the page? What references do I need to put in there to keep it in place. I used the Test Match Sofa box as a template, put in the correct information, but you've removed it from the page. What should I include to prevent it from being removed again? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oraclematt ( talk • contribs) 10:22, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The current infobox is pathetic. Everything contained within it can be found in the lead section:
So in light of that, I don't see the point of it. Cassianto Talk 18:42, 4 August 2016 (UTC) Website guerillacricket.com
OK, so let's compare the original infobox (now deleted) with the one on Test Match Sofa (still there). "Test Match Sofa was a radio programme providing cricket commentary for all England test matches[2] and selected One Day Internationals." - so someone should remove the "Genre" and "Running Time" (which conflicts the first line) from the info box. The "Producers" field should be removed because it's uncredited and is unsubstantiated (not in any of the referenced articles, not in the Wiki page). So that would leave the country (possibly - surely it's obvious from the text that Tooting Bec, Nunhead and South London are in the UK), language, creators and audio format. The infobox for Test Match Sofa adds very little to the article, so is someone going to remove it from there as well, or just remove the redundant fields? I'm sure there are plenty of other examples that one could find where the infobox is (to some people) irrelevant, and to others provides a handy precis of the key information. Ho hum. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oraclematt ( talk • contribs) 21:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Richie, I don't understand your decision to delete the edit I posted yesterday. The original parts which I removed were inaccurate and/or irrelevant. For example, the statement that they had "not managed to gain interviews from professional English cricketers" is clearly wrong, and the list of guest which I included, instead of the single guest previously cited, included several such cricketers. Midsomer ( talk) 06:19, 8 August 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Midsomer ( talk • contribs) 01:24, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Richie, while the citation referred to is correct, the words used do not reflect the content of the cited article. The statement "Though it has not managed to gain interviews from professional English cricketers", is not a reflection of the quote you used above. Current English Test players have not appeared on GC, nor do I believe such appearances have been sought, but several other professional cricketers have. The reference to the actions of the Cricketer Magazine failing to seize The Sky viewing card, while mildly amusing, is hardly relevant or useful, and the reference to just one guest is far better placed in a more comprehensive list of guests. As far as that list is concerned, it is never going to be possible to provide a citation for such a list, unless you want a copy of the PM I received from Nigel Henderson, one of the co-hosts/founders, in response to my request for him to provide such a list. I will endeavour to do an edit citing the Spectator article in a more accurate manner. Midsomer ( talk) 20:00, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
PS - Just read Zen and the art of W Maintenance - Thoroughly enjoyed it! Thank you :) Midsomer ( talk) 06:19, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
The article
M32 motorway you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:M32 motorway for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk)
21:21, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:M32 Bristol.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 18:05, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. I tried to expand this but couldn't find enough even for a destub. Perhaps it would be best to merge it and some of the other landmarks which have little info available into the King Street, Bristol article and develop the main article? Rodw? Perhaps you'd be interested in expanding the street.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:44, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Been to Colston Hall many times, it's one of Britain's most notable rock venues! On King Street some buildings are more notable than others. I think we need to decide which ones to merge. Something like 16 King Street at best should be a small section/paragraph in the street article.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Just looking quickly I would probably think it would be best to merge all of the number address ones into it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:17, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Portway, Bristol you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk)
17:20, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The article
Portway, Bristol you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Portway, Bristol for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk)
21:41, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello dear Ritchie333,, I need your helpless: you must protect and save the article Nikolai Noskov! If you saved this article, I will for you grateful! Thank you! -- Anna Jarvinen ( talk) 10:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Tamar Bridge you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk)
09:00, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
The article
Tamar Bridge you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Tamar Bridge for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk)
11:21, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Ritchie, the IP has gone straight back into the edit war without bothering about the talk page again. BTW, I sent you an email yesterday about an RfC. Cheers - SchroCat ( talk) 07:00, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
I'm pleased to inform you that you won't be getting any more notices about
Tamar Bridge, which you nominated as a
good article.
E
Eng
22:14, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Just to clarify that the last notice you got about
Tamar Bridge, which you nominated as a
good article, was the absolutely last notice you were going to get, except of course this notice. This is the end for sure.
E
Eng
22:14, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Go jump in the Tamar. Did you know that the Cornish on the sign halfway across the Tamar Bridge means "here be dragons"? Or perhaps it's "Kelly's vanilla with flake, please?" Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 07:10, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
On 14 August 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article M32 motorway, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 2011, a field of red poppies, cornflowers, and marigolds was planted alongside the M32 motorway in Bristol to improve the view? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/M32 motorway. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, M32 motorway), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 12:01, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Ritchie333,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Kelly's of Cornwall should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly's of Cornwall .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 10:38, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.. Also, I believe JJE refers to me. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:51, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
A few additional articles that may be of use. Cheers - SchroCat ( talk) 10:50, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
The Kelly's of Cornwall message is the second Westcountry-related thing I've seen pop up on your talk page recently, which has got me thinking you might be from down that way? -- samtar talk or stalk 19:59, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Fenchurch Street railway station you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Miyagawa --
Miyagawa (
talk)
11:01, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
The article
Fenchurch Street railway station you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Fenchurch Street railway station for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Miyagawa --
Miyagawa (
talk)
13:40, 16 August 2016 (UTC)