![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The big question looming over " Cultural references" is surely this one? Martinevans123 ( talk) 21:31, 27 December 2015 (UTC) [1].... ah, what a fag...
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Fleet Street may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 19:44, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Bootleg recording you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk)
09:20, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:18, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Season's Greetings | |
Wishing you a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! Hafspajen ( talk) 09:07, 29 December 2015 (UTC) |
Hello
I notice you deleted this template on 19th November: Could you advise me please on how to protest
this TFD, as it looks decidedly dodgy to me.
This was debated first in February this year (
here), and closed (No Consensus) in March with 4 keeps and 2 deletes (3 with the nom).
It was debated again in September (
here) and closed 23 Oct (again as No Consensus; 5 keeps and 3 (or 4) deletes).
Then it was proposed again about a week later, got 2 votes to merge, was relisted on the 10th (Nov), got 3 votes from previous participants to delete and got a non-admin closure on 18th Nov as a Delete.
I feel this was inappropriate because:
Thanks, Xyl 54 ( talk) 00:23, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
"Deletion Review should not be used: [...] when you have not discussed the matter with the administrator who deleted the page/closed the discussion first, unless there is a substantial reason not to do this and you have explained the reason in your nomination". LjL ( talk) 15:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello
I notice you deleted this template on 19th November: Could you advise me please on how to protest
this TFD, as it looks decidedly dodgy to me.
This was debated first in February this year (
here), and closed (No Consensus) in March with 4 keeps and 2 deletes (3 with the nom).
It was debated again in September (
here) and closed 23 Oct (again as No Consensus; 5 keeps and 3 (or 4) deletes).
Then it was proposed again about a week later, got 2 votes to merge, was relisted on the 10th (Nov), got 3 votes from previous participants to delete and got a non-admin closure on 18th Nov as a Delete.
I feel this was inappropriate because:
Thanks, Xyl 54 ( talk) 00:23, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
"Deletion Review should not be used: [...] when you have not discussed the matter with the administrator who deleted the page/closed the discussion first, unless there is a substantial reason not to do this and you have explained the reason in your nomination". LjL ( talk) 15:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fleet Street, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Strand, Owen Williams and Curtain wall. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:27, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
|
Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unneccessary
blisters. |
Ritchie333,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Poepkop (
talk)
14:14, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
.
Ritchie333,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:47, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() | |
peace bell |
---|
Thank you for inspiration and support, including two excellent GA reviews in 2015, - thanks with my review, and the peace bell by Yunshui! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:43, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Click on bell for the soft sound of peace (and jest) ;) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 12:21, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
I just finished review of the Music Machine article, and have now listed the article as G.A. I inserted the G.A. tag on the talk page. However, perhaps you could go take a peek at it to make sure that I did it just right--just so that everything can proceed accordingly. I'm guessing that the bot does the rest. Garagepunk66 ( talk) 05:41, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() |
Happy New Year |
Ritchie333, wishing you peace, happiness and every good thing in this New Year 2016. ツ |
The article
Oxford Street you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Oxford Street for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Khazar2 --
Khazar2 (
talk)
22:42, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Fleet Street you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk)
23:00, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
I completed a sentence that had been partially redacted at some time past. It didn't make any sense. It obviously referred to the dustup at the recording of a track on Quadrophenia. 'Unfortunately, the technology was not sophisticated enough to deal with the demands of the music, and Daltrey knocked out Townshend in an argument during...' "...during " what? I posted a link to the most informative and most recent interview that dealt with the fight. So what is your purpose in restoring a senseless and incomplete sentence and getting upset with the correction I'd made? Activist ( talk) 03:05, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Both born to hold opinions and prepared to die defending them, it is remarkable that two such diametrically opposed souls have only come to blows once. ‘Ironically, we were filming Love Reign O’er Me for the Quadrophenia movie,’ chuckles Daltrey. ‘Pete was very drunk and has come at me with a guitar, then he’s tried to punch me so I ducked the punch and hit him. It was a very clean uppercut and it knocked him spark out. He still reckons that’s what caused his bald spot.’ ‘I probably deserved to get knocked out,’ sighs Townshend, tugging at the collar of a stylish black shirt. ‘It wasn’t a fight, I just stood there and let him hit me. 'What’s interesting is that he could have killed me. I went out like a light. It took me a while to piece things back together. 'It was a hell of a punch. But it was the only one – there was too much respect there for it to happen again.’
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/event/article-2803957/The-s-Pete-Townshend-Roger-Daltrey-Pete-came-knocked-spark-Roger-Daltrey-Pete-Townshend-interview-decade-just-cause-big-sensation.html#ixzz3wCxynCGw The article deserves a better fix but I'm not going to war over it. Activist ( talk) 18:55, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() | On 3 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bootleg recording, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first popular bootleg rock album was Bob Dylan's Great White Wonder? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bootleg recording. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:02, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Leicester Square you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk)
21:40, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Victoria League, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 02:15, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Women in Music | |
---|---|
![]() |
![]()
|
-- Ipigott ( talk) 16:39, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:38, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
Keep up the great work Ritchie! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:58, 6 January 2016 (UTC) |
It's not that I particularly disagree with you. [3] There's too many proxy-using banned users on this subject matter. This (as well as the reporter) is almost certainly another, who will not be missed. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:40, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
The article
Fleet Street you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Fleet Street for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk)
23:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
The article
Leicester Square you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Leicester Square for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk)
23:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This user helped promote North Circular Road to good article status. |
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
For good works on Wikipedia. SilkTork ✔Tea time 14:29, 10 January 2016 (UTC) |
Keep up the good work. SilkTork ✔Tea time 14:29, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
You participated in an AFD on the Death Before Dishonor (band) article supporting keeping the article based on references you'd located that demonstrated notability of the band. Please improve that article with those sources. The article has sat with a reference concern tag for 3 years. -- RadioFan ( talk) 18:16, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
[4] What was the script you used? W C M email 20:46, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for starting the ban discussion on WP:AN. If I run into the editor again I will no longer feel like I'm on the edge of a precipice when rolling back their edits. BMK ( talk) 05:52, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
WP: It's not at the level of being struck, for that you need grossly offensive comments. Nice to see that you realise this now. It's about time you restored the edit summary of mine that you deleted for containing the word "idiot", isn't it? And that you stop falsely accusing me of vandalism, encouraging people to undo my work, and forcing spelling mistakes into articles. 192.121.113.79 ( talk) 23:38, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Sorry to interrupt the conversation. I blocked the IP, they are a sock puppet of a blocked user. HighInBC 00:41, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() | On 22 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Elephant & Castle tube station, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first baby born on the London Underground was delivered at the Elephant & Castle tube station (pictured) in 1924? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elephant & Castle tube station. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() | On 22 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Elephant & Castle tube station, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first baby born on the London Underground was delivered at the Elephant & Castle tube station (pictured) in 1924? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elephant & Castle tube station. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Ah, you found it! Seem to remember us talking about that months back … JG66 ( talk) 03:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
I'm unfamiliar with the "speedy deletion" process - is there an explanation somewhere of how this decision was made? User:Wighson, who promoted this deletion, is a persistent promoter of unsourced POV revisionist California history. The slanderous attack on me by Yngvadottir two sections above (who I've never heard of before now) demonstrates more of the same anti-editor mindset. WCCasey ( talk) 01:12, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
The hit-and-run deleters are at it again. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Californias (region) WCCasey ( talk) 04:53, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:16, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The big question looming over " Cultural references" is surely this one? Martinevans123 ( talk) 21:31, 27 December 2015 (UTC) [1].... ah, what a fag...
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Fleet Street may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 19:44, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Bootleg recording you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk)
09:20, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:18, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Season's Greetings | |
Wishing you a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! Hafspajen ( talk) 09:07, 29 December 2015 (UTC) |
Hello
I notice you deleted this template on 19th November: Could you advise me please on how to protest
this TFD, as it looks decidedly dodgy to me.
This was debated first in February this year (
here), and closed (No Consensus) in March with 4 keeps and 2 deletes (3 with the nom).
It was debated again in September (
here) and closed 23 Oct (again as No Consensus; 5 keeps and 3 (or 4) deletes).
Then it was proposed again about a week later, got 2 votes to merge, was relisted on the 10th (Nov), got 3 votes from previous participants to delete and got a non-admin closure on 18th Nov as a Delete.
I feel this was inappropriate because:
Thanks, Xyl 54 ( talk) 00:23, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
"Deletion Review should not be used: [...] when you have not discussed the matter with the administrator who deleted the page/closed the discussion first, unless there is a substantial reason not to do this and you have explained the reason in your nomination". LjL ( talk) 15:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello
I notice you deleted this template on 19th November: Could you advise me please on how to protest
this TFD, as it looks decidedly dodgy to me.
This was debated first in February this year (
here), and closed (No Consensus) in March with 4 keeps and 2 deletes (3 with the nom).
It was debated again in September (
here) and closed 23 Oct (again as No Consensus; 5 keeps and 3 (or 4) deletes).
Then it was proposed again about a week later, got 2 votes to merge, was relisted on the 10th (Nov), got 3 votes from previous participants to delete and got a non-admin closure on 18th Nov as a Delete.
I feel this was inappropriate because:
Thanks, Xyl 54 ( talk) 00:23, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
"Deletion Review should not be used: [...] when you have not discussed the matter with the administrator who deleted the page/closed the discussion first, unless there is a substantial reason not to do this and you have explained the reason in your nomination". LjL ( talk) 15:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fleet Street, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Strand, Owen Williams and Curtain wall. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:27, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
|
Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unneccessary
blisters. |
Ritchie333,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Poepkop (
talk)
14:14, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
.
Ritchie333,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:47, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() | |
peace bell |
---|
Thank you for inspiration and support, including two excellent GA reviews in 2015, - thanks with my review, and the peace bell by Yunshui! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:43, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Click on bell for the soft sound of peace (and jest) ;) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 12:21, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
I just finished review of the Music Machine article, and have now listed the article as G.A. I inserted the G.A. tag on the talk page. However, perhaps you could go take a peek at it to make sure that I did it just right--just so that everything can proceed accordingly. I'm guessing that the bot does the rest. Garagepunk66 ( talk) 05:41, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() |
Happy New Year |
Ritchie333, wishing you peace, happiness and every good thing in this New Year 2016. ツ |
The article
Oxford Street you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Oxford Street for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Khazar2 --
Khazar2 (
talk)
22:42, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Fleet Street you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk)
23:00, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
I completed a sentence that had been partially redacted at some time past. It didn't make any sense. It obviously referred to the dustup at the recording of a track on Quadrophenia. 'Unfortunately, the technology was not sophisticated enough to deal with the demands of the music, and Daltrey knocked out Townshend in an argument during...' "...during " what? I posted a link to the most informative and most recent interview that dealt with the fight. So what is your purpose in restoring a senseless and incomplete sentence and getting upset with the correction I'd made? Activist ( talk) 03:05, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Both born to hold opinions and prepared to die defending them, it is remarkable that two such diametrically opposed souls have only come to blows once. ‘Ironically, we were filming Love Reign O’er Me for the Quadrophenia movie,’ chuckles Daltrey. ‘Pete was very drunk and has come at me with a guitar, then he’s tried to punch me so I ducked the punch and hit him. It was a very clean uppercut and it knocked him spark out. He still reckons that’s what caused his bald spot.’ ‘I probably deserved to get knocked out,’ sighs Townshend, tugging at the collar of a stylish black shirt. ‘It wasn’t a fight, I just stood there and let him hit me. 'What’s interesting is that he could have killed me. I went out like a light. It took me a while to piece things back together. 'It was a hell of a punch. But it was the only one – there was too much respect there for it to happen again.’
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/event/article-2803957/The-s-Pete-Townshend-Roger-Daltrey-Pete-came-knocked-spark-Roger-Daltrey-Pete-Townshend-interview-decade-just-cause-big-sensation.html#ixzz3wCxynCGw The article deserves a better fix but I'm not going to war over it. Activist ( talk) 18:55, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() | On 3 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bootleg recording, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first popular bootleg rock album was Bob Dylan's Great White Wonder? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bootleg recording. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:02, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Leicester Square you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk)
21:40, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Victoria League, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 02:15, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Women in Music | |
---|---|
![]() |
![]()
|
-- Ipigott ( talk) 16:39, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:38, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
Keep up the great work Ritchie! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:58, 6 January 2016 (UTC) |
It's not that I particularly disagree with you. [3] There's too many proxy-using banned users on this subject matter. This (as well as the reporter) is almost certainly another, who will not be missed. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:40, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
The article
Fleet Street you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Fleet Street for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk)
23:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
The article
Leicester Square you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Leicester Square for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk)
23:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This user helped promote North Circular Road to good article status. |
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
For good works on Wikipedia. SilkTork ✔Tea time 14:29, 10 January 2016 (UTC) |
Keep up the good work. SilkTork ✔Tea time 14:29, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
You participated in an AFD on the Death Before Dishonor (band) article supporting keeping the article based on references you'd located that demonstrated notability of the band. Please improve that article with those sources. The article has sat with a reference concern tag for 3 years. -- RadioFan ( talk) 18:16, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
[4] What was the script you used? W C M email 20:46, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for starting the ban discussion on WP:AN. If I run into the editor again I will no longer feel like I'm on the edge of a precipice when rolling back their edits. BMK ( talk) 05:52, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
WP: It's not at the level of being struck, for that you need grossly offensive comments. Nice to see that you realise this now. It's about time you restored the edit summary of mine that you deleted for containing the word "idiot", isn't it? And that you stop falsely accusing me of vandalism, encouraging people to undo my work, and forcing spelling mistakes into articles. 192.121.113.79 ( talk) 23:38, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Sorry to interrupt the conversation. I blocked the IP, they are a sock puppet of a blocked user. HighInBC 00:41, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() | On 22 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Elephant & Castle tube station, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first baby born on the London Underground was delivered at the Elephant & Castle tube station (pictured) in 1924? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elephant & Castle tube station. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() | On 22 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Elephant & Castle tube station, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first baby born on the London Underground was delivered at the Elephant & Castle tube station (pictured) in 1924? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elephant & Castle tube station. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Ah, you found it! Seem to remember us talking about that months back … JG66 ( talk) 03:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
I'm unfamiliar with the "speedy deletion" process - is there an explanation somewhere of how this decision was made? User:Wighson, who promoted this deletion, is a persistent promoter of unsourced POV revisionist California history. The slanderous attack on me by Yngvadottir two sections above (who I've never heard of before now) demonstrates more of the same anti-editor mindset. WCCasey ( talk) 01:12, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
The hit-and-run deleters are at it again. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Californias (region) WCCasey ( talk) 04:53, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:16, 23 January 2016 (UTC)