...just because a naked talk page is sad to see. -- Flyguy649 talk contribs 16:52, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
I can revert vandalism faster than he can vandalise! — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 08:40, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Same vandal as described here, probably from somewhere in the 91.108 block. I'd suggest asking a checkuser to find the new IP range to block, the war of attrition against socks is tedious. Sorry about your userpage, it's one of the dozen or so most popular lightning rods for this sort of thing. ˉˉ anetode ╦╩ 08:58, 22 September 2007 (UTC) You do realise my comments on this MfD were intended as humorous? Both you and ^demon seem to have taken them somewhat too seriously - [2] [3]. I wasn't trying to make editcount a big issue; it was a comment intended to lighten the mood in a somewhat contentious MfD (in which, incidentally, I didn't have a strong opinion). Walton One 09:20, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I Just wanted to ask you about interwikis. If there is an available article on the Simple English Wikipedia, should it be linked in the interwiki section on articles. I have seen them linked in many articles before but another user has a different opinion (see here). Just wanted the opinion of an admin to avoid a possible edit war. Thanks! -- ¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 12:17, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Why does it say "In other languages:
then? Maybe you guys should change that, since Simple English is not a different language. I don't care if it says interwiki or whatever, it says DIFFERENT LANGUAGE, so someone should explain that to me, because Simple English is not a different language. --- Who's the one you call Mr. Macho? The head honcho, swift fist like Camacho 15:07, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Hey, random Q - So I was mindlessly browsing Wikipedia and I somehow came across your Talk Page. To the point - How did you learn about formatting your page to look the way it does, with the borders and headers etc? I think it's a sweet layout, though it has that blatant hint of girlishness haha. Just curious - HOOK A FELLOW INDIAN UP!!! :) => Harish - 23:02, 22 September 2007 (UTC) {{ editprotected}}plz be adding " Not so sexy user" :P Will ( talk) 23:12, 22 September 2007 (UTC) I owe you a big thank you for supporting me in My RfA, which was successful with 67 supports and 20 opposes. - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 23:46, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Hi Riana, please kindly assist Mangwanani who has been working almost single handedly on Wiki Project Zimbabwe. Most of us lack technical ability like yours. Many thanks for your consideration.
Part 12:03, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
..for blocking Michaelbryson. Auroranorth 12:47, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi Riana. You removed the {{ db-c1}} tag from this category "for record keeping". However, the category contains no pages, someone manually added those users to the category text. Is it really necessary to preserve this empty category? His former alternate accounts are listed on his userpage anyway, so the category would appear redundant to me. Cheers, Melsaran ( talk) 13:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Please block - multiple 'final warnings'. Auroranorth 13:31, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Now exists as United Provinces Of Sergana. I nominated to AFD before noticing the subtle spelling difference. Feel free to work with the AFD or delete as before, if you have that right. - CobaltBlueTony 18:54, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Oops, did I hardblock & change it to a softblock? Doh! Thought I'd done it the other war round... (slaps head) — iridescent (talk to me!) 19:50, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
I am sorry but I am not able to function this site properly. Is it all right if we contact by e-mail? Ulises Heureaux 21:07, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Riana... -- DarkFalls talk 10:29, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
I just sent something to be aware about to your inbox. -- Kyok o 14:43, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Hey again, if you have a bit of time to spare please kindly make my user page sexy (I lack the technical prowess). I have confidence that whatever you decide will be sexy, just playing my part, if you see what I mean. Many thanks. Part 17:36, 24 September 2007 (UTC) Hi Riana. I have some concerns with your unblocking of User:AussieJr. I suspect sockpuppetry is continuing.
It may be worth reviewing your unblock. Please let me know if you need more information. -- Mattinbgn\ talk 00:13, 25 September 2007 (UTC) All the Tibetan/Chinese infoboxes have been affected by vandalism on a template or something see Dhingri -it blanks or ruined 800+ articles can you sort it thanks ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 15:18, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi Riana! I've finally started working on RFPP again (I said I would in my RFA, read the policy, went over a few requests...and postponed it until now), but I was wondering if requests like this one (userpage requests by the user) should be protected or declined; it isn't specifically mentioned in WP:PPOL. Thanks! · AndonicO Talk 18:26, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
User:Internetcoffeephone blockI'm just trying to understand this username block [4]. I assume that you understand what the original reporting user meant by "The "Internet Coffee Phone" vandalism", so I'm just trying to get my head around how/why this username was a violation. SamBC( talk) 17:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for banning that vandal :) Now the vmk board does not have so much vandalism its annoying. Once again thank you :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dacheatcode ( talk • contribs) 20:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC) Hello Riana! Someone using the IP address 125.26.56.63, vandalized my user page. Can you find about this IP? Thank you. 02:30, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Greetings, Riana. I'm a bit astonished to see you close Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Asteraki/Pascha as "no consensus". The way I see it, there were four unambiguous "deletes" (including the nomination statement), one "keep" (by RucasHost ( talk · contribs)) that was so poorly argued/worded that it wasn't even discernable what page he was talking about (the description "a well designed userpage with references to various historical figures" doesn't remotely match any of the five pages involved, let alone all of them, and he didn't respond to a request for clarification, so I'd have expected that vote to be discounted); and one opinion (by Geo Swan ( talk · contribs)) who first said keep but then changed his mind to delete with respect to at least two of the pages ( User:Asteraki/Pascha and User:Kamikazi2/Greek macedonian of german wiki). These two are GFDL violations anyway, because they mirror deleted content from de-wiki. (Okay, I admit I didn't bring forward that argument in the discussion.) Moreover, a third one turned out to have been a copyvio in most of its parts too. Would you reconsider? Thanks, Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:05, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, could you please unprotect my userpage so I can make a quick adjustment to it? I plan on making a revamped page in the future, but for now I want to swap out quotes for something more optimistic. Please protect the page when I'm done, OK? Thanks! -- Kyok o 17:12, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I just wanted to request if you could protect all of my userpages? I wont be editing as much and will therefore not be able to check them that regularly. Thanks! -- ¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 17:26, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
OTRS notice on Vice-Admiral of CornwallI believe this notice has been placed in error. That page was created by myself based on Sir John Sainty's lists of Vice Admirals of the Coasts placed online by the Institute of Historical Research and duly linked as a reference. The page referenced in the OTRS notice deals entirely with the history of one particular holder of the office, and, indeed, gives a date for his appointment (1632) conflicting with Sainty's information (apptd. 14 September 1638 in succession to James Bagg, dec'd. 26 August 1638). In short, the content from the page in question is not reflected in Vice-Admiral of Cornwall and the notice is not correct in asserting that it has been. Thanks, Choess 19:07, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
What happened to it? I miss it :( Will ( talk) 19:17, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Oh, boy! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 31 has been released! .mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/09/26/wikipedia-weekly-31-return-of-the-panel/ and as always, you can download old episodes and more at http://wikipediaweekly.com/. Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly. We're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project! For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 02:38, 29 September 2007 (UTC) If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list. Thanks for uploading Image:SanFrancisco49ers 1000.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:55, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
You're welcome. It s nice to know I'm doing something useful around here. ;) — Moondyne 04:32, 29 September 2007 (UTC) IP vandal User:87.10.23.32 returns as User:87.17.210.145Hi, Riana. It appears an anon user you blocked has returned as User:87.17.210.145 and has resumed vandalizing. I note that this user, or perhaps a group of users who share an ISP and a remarkably similar set of preoccupations, make similar edits to this set of articles on a fairly regular basis:
This isn't by any means a complete list. Have you any idea what the "docg" that appears in the user's edit summaries refers to? I'm fairly certain it's not this, even if the editor is in Italy :) -- Rrburke( talk) 14:43, 29 September 2007 (UTC) I've protected two of those articles for a month for repeated vandalism and certainly for preventing him of starting over again.-- JForget 17:59, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
You deleted the List of stuff article by the argument "The result was speedily deleted". I remind you that more people voted for Keep then for Delete (7 Keeps, 4 Deletes), so please restore it. The discussion can be found [here]. Thank you. M.V.E.i. 20:41, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
User:Raja-Hindoostani has vandalized my page several times. [7], [8], and the last one today [9] I've sent him several messages but he has removed them. I'm really not a sock puppet. Thanks, regards, -- Shahid • Talk2me 21:46, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
I think you need to keep your socks in line ;) Gscshoyru 22:43, 29 September 2007 (UTC) Honestly, I don't know. :( Nishkid64 ( talk) 02:07, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Greetings! Please refer to the above page for a suggestion on getting this article back on track. Cordially, Drieux 03:28, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
I'm offended that you templated me. As you know, the three revert rule does not apply in cases of vandalism. I have attempted to use the talk pages for the Alcoholics Anonymous and Twelve-step program articles article to discuss these edits with the user to no avail. If you have other suggestions, I would appreciate them. If not, you should semi-protect the article. -- Craigtalbert 05:02, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
I've been welcoming users for the last 20 mins, and during my travels, I've seen your name pop up so many times, it's not funny! You really are a tireless contributor Riana - I look up to you. :) See you around. Spawn Man 10:23, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
You've got mail!-- Porcupine ( prickle me!) 12:27, 30 September 2007 (UTC) Hello Riana. Can you check that an OTRS ticket is genuinely giving permission to use the images, such as
Image:Sushmita_Sen.jpg.
This one? Thanks! So, you were one of the
Repeated vandalism of Anna Anderson pageHi Riana, I am sorry to have to bring this matter to your attention. An anonymous user User talk:209.136.71.163 is repeatedly vandalising the Anna Anderson page and also resorting to personal abuse of other contributors via alteration of an external link - (* Anna Anderson Exposed: Fact Fiction and Fantasy - a site about Anna Anderson) You will notice 209.136.71.163 has been given repeated warnings of the consequences of their actions on many occasions and has not desisted. The Anna Anderson page has settled down considerably over the last number of months after being very unpleasant. It would appear that 209.136.71.163 needs to be blocked for a period. Can you investigate please? Thanks in advance, Finneganw 01.31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, this is really random, but I've heard you're a great wikipedian, so here goes- My adoptee is having trouble with her signature, but I'm completely lost on what to do for it. Her sig has the same bug that mine had awhile ago, but I'm not sure how mine went away. This is what it puts down when you check it on edit this page- [[User:Summerluvin|<font color="turquoise" face="centurygothic">'''Summer'''</font>[[User talk:Summerluvin|<font color="teal" face="centurygothic">'''luvin'''</font>]]]] 00:50, 1 October 2007 (UTC) Do you know anything that I could do for this? Thanks in advance! -- Polar Wolf ( sign ) 00:54, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you so much! :) -- Polar Wolf ( sign ) 03:40, 1 October 2007 (UTC) A recent range hardblock is causing collateral damage here. I don't know the reasons behind the hardblock. I can leave it to you or I can help if you bring me up to speed.-- Chaser - T 02:44, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{ subst:Vangel}}! — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 04:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC) I have seen this a few times over the past couple days...what is OTRS? I tried to find out, but you need a password and whatever. I am just curious. Take Care... NeutralHomer T: C 05:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Undelete that. I gave that page as evidence to the police, and now it is deleted. Whether or not this is a hoax, is irrelevant. — Moe ε 18:38, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Riana, I think you handled this the right way. Thanks. Durova Charge! 20:02, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey i'm new but you helped User:polarwolf fix my signature so thanks -- Summer luvin 23:32, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Re: RfPP: Orange InstitutionWhilst retrospectively I do agree with the decline decision at the moment, just to make you aware, that a similar article, The Troubles, with all the same editors, including One Night In Hackney (who commented on the RfPP) has gone all the way to RfAr, and continues to be a very very lengthy ongoing debate. These issues are contentious for the obvious reasons - just a heads up that Orange Institution may head in the same direction as it's the same teams of editors involved. Liverpool Scouse 15:11, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Is this name okay? I've been blocked so many times trying to find a suitable one.I'ts a little dorky, but at least it's shorter, which was the main complaint.-- Swing, Baby, Swing! 12:11, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Potential misuse of sysop editing privileges on protected article Mahmoud AhmadinejadAfter you had protected the article, a content edit was made by Omegatron ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). The sentence affected was one of those at the core of the mediation, to which the admin was invited to join, but demurred (see User talk:Omegatron#Your edits to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad). As this may have been an accident, since the template on the page was the small version, so the admin was informed, both on his userpage at user talk:Omegatron#Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - edits to protected page and accidental abuse of sysop rights and via e-mail. As of 0942 (-500 UTC) this morning, the admin was aware of the issue, as he responded to my e-mail. In the discussion he stated that felt that mediation was not a valid reason to lock the article and that it should be unlocked, and he has not reverted the edit. At this point, even if the edit was accidental, maintaining it would appear to be a violation of the sysop right to edit protected pages. Being a party to the mediation process, I would appreciate if you could restore the article to the state it was at the lock and inform admin Omegatron as to the impropriety of making such edits. Is this something that needs to be brought up on WP:ANI? Thank you. -- Avi 16:54, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Also responded on WP:ANI#Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad_mediation_and_unilateral_edits_by_Omegatron.C2.A0.28talk.C2.A0.C2.B7_contribs.29 — Omegatron 00:16, 4 October 2007 (UTC) Hi, You have, as I requested, semi-protected my userpage rather than fully protect. However, my sub-pages are still fully protected and I cant edit them. Could you please make all of my userpages/subpages semi-protected?. Thanks -- ¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 17:57, 3 October 2007 (UTC) you protected the Mahmoud Ahmadinejad article, regardless of whether your action is justified or not, you forgot to put the "large" protection template. Cheers, -- Pejman47 20:17, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Riana. User:Hindu-Boar has started questioning the license and has been tagging the images with factual accuracy disputed. Please can you set the record straight with him and confirm its verification- he is convices it is false. PLease respond to this thanks ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 11:25, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you =D I have been contributing a lot on Norse Mythology articles, but my IPs changed randomly (^_^); I have accounts, but forgot the password, and my email's password too ;p This is the first time I see a nice person here, BTW 222.252.229.56 10:58, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
I think we could probably unprotect John Stossel. We've been working on a section to replace the disputed area - discussion and example viewable under Example. Once unprotected, we'll replace the list under the section "Controversies" with the text offered under Example. At this point, there are no objections to replacing the text and disputes have been worked out, but not everyone has commented. So I hope that we'll be able to replace it without edit wars and then tweak as needed. If it becomes an issue again, we can always reprotect it. Thanks Morphh (talk) 19:22, 06 October 2007 (UTC)
You've been loved by OneCoolKid[13] *sniff*. First the Rugby World Cup loss to England and now this Your poor sock is feeling down... -- DarkFalls talk 02:52, 7 October 2007 (UTC) Time rub it in your face after a rather embarassing Ashes... Will ( talk) 09:31, 7 October 2007 (UTC) Would it be possible to find out where this user is located? I don't appericate the comments made in this diff or this diff as they are completely false and completely uncalled for. Since the website in question was operated by me (has since been taken offline) I have had to deal with problems, lies and other crap from whoever this person is on different websites and don't wish to have deal with them here. Personally I would like to press charges (as my email accounts, website accounts, and accounts for other websites were hacked). If possible, could a block also be placed on this user's account for the time being as well? I would appericate it. Take Care.... NeutralHomer T: C 06:06, 7 October 2007 (UTC) ... seems to have taken one helluva beating! I've semiprotected it, feel free to ask me or at RFPP if you want it lifted. Cheers, ~ Riana ⁂ 12:22, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Rather than protecting a signature template like you did here, you may want to consider letting the user know that transcluding such templates is forbidden. Have a nice day. -- PEJL 13:25, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey, did you mean to protect homeopathy indefinitely? It seems like there's just one editor there who's insisting on adding a tag without adequate explanation or discussion; there appear to be a lot of other editors who are making reasonable, referenced edits to the article. TenOfAllTrades( talk) 20:03, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
( User:Whig) is arguing seriously and according to the rules . Some people from the other group too. But if you look at the talk page you will understand what it is going on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sm565 ( talk • contribs) 00:11, 8 October 2007 (UTC) The article is POV. Clearly. I tried to put a sign and it is reverted immediately. This group denies that there is another opinion in the forum. If you look at the talk pages you will see that most of the references dont support what the article states. Even the editors agreed with that. [14] [15] best wishes -- Sm565 23:59, 7 October 2007 (UTC) Hi In homeopathy talk page we attempt to put all the studies together , evaluate what they say and report. some users they dont follow our kind requests and they write directly into the studies section in order to disrupt in my opinion ....can you protect the page? thanks-- Sm565 16:22, 8 October 2007 (UTC) Hellow please take a look at what the actuall request to Blyguyn was. He claimed more socks from the Toronto Tamil club which is a assumption based on no hard facts besides that the IP's were from Toronto. This is like saying that there such a club that edits wikipedia on certain basis. It is also like implying that "Tamils" are pov pushing. As such my request is proper. Thanks Watchdogb 05:15, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Personal Attack from user NetmongerHi, I would like to report Netmonger for a personal attack made against me here. This is not the first time this has happened. He has been blocked here about a week ago for posting a harassing message on my talk page here and sending me a vulgar harassing e-mail. Thank you. Wiki Raja 05:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Riana, just to let you know that I have recreated the ROMacedonia WP with a few mods which will hopefully not lead it to the same destination as last time! I wasn't aware I was in breach of any guidelines when I recreated it -- Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) alerted me to it and suggested I let you know. I hope this is OK. I have also notifed Aecis ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). Cheers, AWN AWN2 15:41, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
The header says it all. :) Acalamari 17:54, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Did you create the account m:User:Danzilgoes on Meta? (On the user page is claimed that it is your account. "Bot run by Riana from the English Wikipedia.", Majorly deleted it meanwhile.) I blocked it infinitely for vandalism, and I hope it was not you. -- Thogo (Talk) 21:55, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
The page Probability derivations for making low hands in Omaha hold 'em that I created some time ago was deleted by User:Kurykh with the comment "CSD A5: Has been transwikied". I'm not able to find it on Wikibooks...any idea where it went? — Doug Bell 05:13, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Great news! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 32 has been released! .mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/10/09/episode-32-trust-me/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/. For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 08:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC) If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
I've been putting up as many of these as I can, and getting complaints they're too ugly and obnoxious. Per the Village Pump discussion on the subject, I plan to upload versions with slightly softened colours. Is there any problem with this? It has in fact been discussed at length, with the one thing there is consensus on being that they're just a bit too crappy-looking ... - David Gerard 19:59, 10 October 2007 (UTC) Hello Riana Noel Hidalgo is coming to Adelaide on Friday October 12 He will be at the Central Market for breakfast at Lucias 8am He is doing the http://luckofseven.com tour. He is interested in meeting open source and free culture folk around the world. Feel free to email me to check up about other times. eg. Perhaps the Richmnd Hotel upstairs after 5pm on Friday evening for coffee drinks chat kinds of things. Cheers Lucychili 21:02, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page User:Riana Test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mercury 04:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Does it make anyone else laugh that the only two "Master Editors" on Wikipedia are Riana and DarkFalls? No one else meets the criteria...they are the best (and congrats to them, by the way). Is it a good or bad thing when out of a "crapload" of editors and users only 2 of them can be considered "Master Editors"? Either way, congrats to Riana and DarkFalls, just wanted to give you all a rough time. :) - NeutralHomer T: C 06:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello, could you check permission for the Image:Daniella Alonso.jpg? I think it's suspicious because the OTRS template was added to Image:DaniellaAlonsoHillsPremiere.jpg by User:Tripplerage at uploading time. Conscious 06:52, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
I disagree with you deletion of noema. My judgement is based on the version of the entry show here (2nd section from the top), http://www.answers.com/topic/noema. In deleting the entry you wrote, "concern was: not a philosophically significant concept outside of Husserl/phenomenology, and better treated in those articles. In addition, we've got a bunch of original research here": 1. Other Wikipedia entries seem to vouch for the significance of noema outside of Husserl and phenomenology as the term appears in Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Transcendence (philosophy), Continental Philosophy, Glossary of rhetorical terms, List of philosophical topics (I-Q), List of psychology topics, and Philosophy of mind. Moreover the Philosophy of mind entry contains a "see noema" reference to the deleted entry indicating that, in Wikipedia's coverage of philosophy, it was decided that noema would be, and was, properly covered in a separate entry. 2. Even if noema would be better treated in the phenomenology or Husserl entries it clearly isn't or at least not in the general way in which it was treated in the deleted entry. And in seeing how noema was treated in a general way in the deleted entry, it seems clear that such a general treatment, as is needed for an introduction to the concept of noema, would integrate poorly as part of another entry. 3. I can't say for sure but the deleted entry sure doesn't sound like original research. Patrick Mhnin0 07:43, 11 October 2007 (UTC) *adds you to Category:Doctor editors*End of the universe! Have fun! Bye-bye! *runs while Riana watches, bemused* Will ( talk) 09:01, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
User:VivekOberoiluver needs to be deleted. It is based on Vivek Oberoi ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 11:41, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
See here. He has only made a few edits but needs to be stopped under that user name before he goes any further. Regards ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 00:03, 12 October 2007 (UTC) Hi Riana, you've got mail! :) -- Kyok o 15:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed you were involved in the revert war that has been ongoing there, so thought I would ask for your input at Talk:United Kingdom#Edit war over inclusion of Ulster Banner. I hope we can take the matter forward there. Best wishes, -- John 17:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Click there to open your card! → → →
My dear Wikipedian Riana, CreditsThis RFA thanks was inspired by The Random Editor, who in turn was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks. So unfortunately this is not entirely my own design. This end the usual RFA thanks spam. You may return to your regular editing now. A couple new episodes - we're posting the infobox to save duplicating info.
Fuzheado,
Gamaliel,
Effeietsanders,
Nikikana,
LilyOfTheWest, and
SuperHamster discuss the annual
Wiki Loves Monuments worldwide photography contest
Subscription · Feedback
Thank you for supporting my RfA, which unfortunately didn't succeed. The majority of the opposes stated that I needed more experience in the main namespace and Wikipedia namespace, so that is what I will do. I will go for another RfA in two month's time and I hope you will be able to support me then as well. If you have any other comments for me or wish to be notified when I go for another RfA, please leave them on my talk page. If you wish to nominate me for my next RfA, please wait until it has been two months. Thanks again for participating in my RfA! -- Cobi( t| c| b| cn) 00:56, 12 October 2007 (UTC) Riana, Thank you for restoring Noema. Hope I didn't offend with my vigorous rebuttal of the deletion. I should have read about prods first. My mistake. Thank you, Patrick Mhnin0 01:23, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Try adding me again (though you may have forgot that (for some reason) GTalk doesn't put you online on my contact list) :) Will ( talk) 19:38, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
|
...just because a naked talk page is sad to see. -- Flyguy649 talk contribs 16:52, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
I can revert vandalism faster than he can vandalise! — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 08:40, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Same vandal as described here, probably from somewhere in the 91.108 block. I'd suggest asking a checkuser to find the new IP range to block, the war of attrition against socks is tedious. Sorry about your userpage, it's one of the dozen or so most popular lightning rods for this sort of thing. ˉˉ anetode ╦╩ 08:58, 22 September 2007 (UTC) You do realise my comments on this MfD were intended as humorous? Both you and ^demon seem to have taken them somewhat too seriously - [2] [3]. I wasn't trying to make editcount a big issue; it was a comment intended to lighten the mood in a somewhat contentious MfD (in which, incidentally, I didn't have a strong opinion). Walton One 09:20, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I Just wanted to ask you about interwikis. If there is an available article on the Simple English Wikipedia, should it be linked in the interwiki section on articles. I have seen them linked in many articles before but another user has a different opinion (see here). Just wanted the opinion of an admin to avoid a possible edit war. Thanks! -- ¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 12:17, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Why does it say "In other languages:
then? Maybe you guys should change that, since Simple English is not a different language. I don't care if it says interwiki or whatever, it says DIFFERENT LANGUAGE, so someone should explain that to me, because Simple English is not a different language. --- Who's the one you call Mr. Macho? The head honcho, swift fist like Camacho 15:07, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Hey, random Q - So I was mindlessly browsing Wikipedia and I somehow came across your Talk Page. To the point - How did you learn about formatting your page to look the way it does, with the borders and headers etc? I think it's a sweet layout, though it has that blatant hint of girlishness haha. Just curious - HOOK A FELLOW INDIAN UP!!! :) => Harish - 23:02, 22 September 2007 (UTC) {{ editprotected}}plz be adding " Not so sexy user" :P Will ( talk) 23:12, 22 September 2007 (UTC) I owe you a big thank you for supporting me in My RfA, which was successful with 67 supports and 20 opposes. - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 23:46, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Hi Riana, please kindly assist Mangwanani who has been working almost single handedly on Wiki Project Zimbabwe. Most of us lack technical ability like yours. Many thanks for your consideration.
Part 12:03, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
..for blocking Michaelbryson. Auroranorth 12:47, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi Riana. You removed the {{ db-c1}} tag from this category "for record keeping". However, the category contains no pages, someone manually added those users to the category text. Is it really necessary to preserve this empty category? His former alternate accounts are listed on his userpage anyway, so the category would appear redundant to me. Cheers, Melsaran ( talk) 13:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Please block - multiple 'final warnings'. Auroranorth 13:31, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Now exists as United Provinces Of Sergana. I nominated to AFD before noticing the subtle spelling difference. Feel free to work with the AFD or delete as before, if you have that right. - CobaltBlueTony 18:54, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Oops, did I hardblock & change it to a softblock? Doh! Thought I'd done it the other war round... (slaps head) — iridescent (talk to me!) 19:50, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
I am sorry but I am not able to function this site properly. Is it all right if we contact by e-mail? Ulises Heureaux 21:07, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Riana... -- DarkFalls talk 10:29, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
I just sent something to be aware about to your inbox. -- Kyok o 14:43, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Hey again, if you have a bit of time to spare please kindly make my user page sexy (I lack the technical prowess). I have confidence that whatever you decide will be sexy, just playing my part, if you see what I mean. Many thanks. Part 17:36, 24 September 2007 (UTC) Hi Riana. I have some concerns with your unblocking of User:AussieJr. I suspect sockpuppetry is continuing.
It may be worth reviewing your unblock. Please let me know if you need more information. -- Mattinbgn\ talk 00:13, 25 September 2007 (UTC) All the Tibetan/Chinese infoboxes have been affected by vandalism on a template or something see Dhingri -it blanks or ruined 800+ articles can you sort it thanks ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 15:18, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi Riana! I've finally started working on RFPP again (I said I would in my RFA, read the policy, went over a few requests...and postponed it until now), but I was wondering if requests like this one (userpage requests by the user) should be protected or declined; it isn't specifically mentioned in WP:PPOL. Thanks! · AndonicO Talk 18:26, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
User:Internetcoffeephone blockI'm just trying to understand this username block [4]. I assume that you understand what the original reporting user meant by "The "Internet Coffee Phone" vandalism", so I'm just trying to get my head around how/why this username was a violation. SamBC( talk) 17:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for banning that vandal :) Now the vmk board does not have so much vandalism its annoying. Once again thank you :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dacheatcode ( talk • contribs) 20:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC) Hello Riana! Someone using the IP address 125.26.56.63, vandalized my user page. Can you find about this IP? Thank you. 02:30, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Greetings, Riana. I'm a bit astonished to see you close Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Asteraki/Pascha as "no consensus". The way I see it, there were four unambiguous "deletes" (including the nomination statement), one "keep" (by RucasHost ( talk · contribs)) that was so poorly argued/worded that it wasn't even discernable what page he was talking about (the description "a well designed userpage with references to various historical figures" doesn't remotely match any of the five pages involved, let alone all of them, and he didn't respond to a request for clarification, so I'd have expected that vote to be discounted); and one opinion (by Geo Swan ( talk · contribs)) who first said keep but then changed his mind to delete with respect to at least two of the pages ( User:Asteraki/Pascha and User:Kamikazi2/Greek macedonian of german wiki). These two are GFDL violations anyway, because they mirror deleted content from de-wiki. (Okay, I admit I didn't bring forward that argument in the discussion.) Moreover, a third one turned out to have been a copyvio in most of its parts too. Would you reconsider? Thanks, Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:05, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, could you please unprotect my userpage so I can make a quick adjustment to it? I plan on making a revamped page in the future, but for now I want to swap out quotes for something more optimistic. Please protect the page when I'm done, OK? Thanks! -- Kyok o 17:12, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I just wanted to request if you could protect all of my userpages? I wont be editing as much and will therefore not be able to check them that regularly. Thanks! -- ¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 17:26, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
OTRS notice on Vice-Admiral of CornwallI believe this notice has been placed in error. That page was created by myself based on Sir John Sainty's lists of Vice Admirals of the Coasts placed online by the Institute of Historical Research and duly linked as a reference. The page referenced in the OTRS notice deals entirely with the history of one particular holder of the office, and, indeed, gives a date for his appointment (1632) conflicting with Sainty's information (apptd. 14 September 1638 in succession to James Bagg, dec'd. 26 August 1638). In short, the content from the page in question is not reflected in Vice-Admiral of Cornwall and the notice is not correct in asserting that it has been. Thanks, Choess 19:07, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
What happened to it? I miss it :( Will ( talk) 19:17, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Oh, boy! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 31 has been released! .mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/09/26/wikipedia-weekly-31-return-of-the-panel/ and as always, you can download old episodes and more at http://wikipediaweekly.com/. Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly. We're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project! For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 02:38, 29 September 2007 (UTC) If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list. Thanks for uploading Image:SanFrancisco49ers 1000.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:55, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
You're welcome. It s nice to know I'm doing something useful around here. ;) — Moondyne 04:32, 29 September 2007 (UTC) IP vandal User:87.10.23.32 returns as User:87.17.210.145Hi, Riana. It appears an anon user you blocked has returned as User:87.17.210.145 and has resumed vandalizing. I note that this user, or perhaps a group of users who share an ISP and a remarkably similar set of preoccupations, make similar edits to this set of articles on a fairly regular basis:
This isn't by any means a complete list. Have you any idea what the "docg" that appears in the user's edit summaries refers to? I'm fairly certain it's not this, even if the editor is in Italy :) -- Rrburke( talk) 14:43, 29 September 2007 (UTC) I've protected two of those articles for a month for repeated vandalism and certainly for preventing him of starting over again.-- JForget 17:59, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
You deleted the List of stuff article by the argument "The result was speedily deleted". I remind you that more people voted for Keep then for Delete (7 Keeps, 4 Deletes), so please restore it. The discussion can be found [here]. Thank you. M.V.E.i. 20:41, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
User:Raja-Hindoostani has vandalized my page several times. [7], [8], and the last one today [9] I've sent him several messages but he has removed them. I'm really not a sock puppet. Thanks, regards, -- Shahid • Talk2me 21:46, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
I think you need to keep your socks in line ;) Gscshoyru 22:43, 29 September 2007 (UTC) Honestly, I don't know. :( Nishkid64 ( talk) 02:07, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Greetings! Please refer to the above page for a suggestion on getting this article back on track. Cordially, Drieux 03:28, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
I'm offended that you templated me. As you know, the three revert rule does not apply in cases of vandalism. I have attempted to use the talk pages for the Alcoholics Anonymous and Twelve-step program articles article to discuss these edits with the user to no avail. If you have other suggestions, I would appreciate them. If not, you should semi-protect the article. -- Craigtalbert 05:02, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
I've been welcoming users for the last 20 mins, and during my travels, I've seen your name pop up so many times, it's not funny! You really are a tireless contributor Riana - I look up to you. :) See you around. Spawn Man 10:23, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
You've got mail!-- Porcupine ( prickle me!) 12:27, 30 September 2007 (UTC) Hello Riana. Can you check that an OTRS ticket is genuinely giving permission to use the images, such as
Image:Sushmita_Sen.jpg.
This one? Thanks! So, you were one of the
Repeated vandalism of Anna Anderson pageHi Riana, I am sorry to have to bring this matter to your attention. An anonymous user User talk:209.136.71.163 is repeatedly vandalising the Anna Anderson page and also resorting to personal abuse of other contributors via alteration of an external link - (* Anna Anderson Exposed: Fact Fiction and Fantasy - a site about Anna Anderson) You will notice 209.136.71.163 has been given repeated warnings of the consequences of their actions on many occasions and has not desisted. The Anna Anderson page has settled down considerably over the last number of months after being very unpleasant. It would appear that 209.136.71.163 needs to be blocked for a period. Can you investigate please? Thanks in advance, Finneganw 01.31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, this is really random, but I've heard you're a great wikipedian, so here goes- My adoptee is having trouble with her signature, but I'm completely lost on what to do for it. Her sig has the same bug that mine had awhile ago, but I'm not sure how mine went away. This is what it puts down when you check it on edit this page- [[User:Summerluvin|<font color="turquoise" face="centurygothic">'''Summer'''</font>[[User talk:Summerluvin|<font color="teal" face="centurygothic">'''luvin'''</font>]]]] 00:50, 1 October 2007 (UTC) Do you know anything that I could do for this? Thanks in advance! -- Polar Wolf ( sign ) 00:54, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you so much! :) -- Polar Wolf ( sign ) 03:40, 1 October 2007 (UTC) A recent range hardblock is causing collateral damage here. I don't know the reasons behind the hardblock. I can leave it to you or I can help if you bring me up to speed.-- Chaser - T 02:44, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{ subst:Vangel}}! — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 04:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC) I have seen this a few times over the past couple days...what is OTRS? I tried to find out, but you need a password and whatever. I am just curious. Take Care... NeutralHomer T: C 05:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Undelete that. I gave that page as evidence to the police, and now it is deleted. Whether or not this is a hoax, is irrelevant. — Moe ε 18:38, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Riana, I think you handled this the right way. Thanks. Durova Charge! 20:02, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey i'm new but you helped User:polarwolf fix my signature so thanks -- Summer luvin 23:32, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Re: RfPP: Orange InstitutionWhilst retrospectively I do agree with the decline decision at the moment, just to make you aware, that a similar article, The Troubles, with all the same editors, including One Night In Hackney (who commented on the RfPP) has gone all the way to RfAr, and continues to be a very very lengthy ongoing debate. These issues are contentious for the obvious reasons - just a heads up that Orange Institution may head in the same direction as it's the same teams of editors involved. Liverpool Scouse 15:11, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Is this name okay? I've been blocked so many times trying to find a suitable one.I'ts a little dorky, but at least it's shorter, which was the main complaint.-- Swing, Baby, Swing! 12:11, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Potential misuse of sysop editing privileges on protected article Mahmoud AhmadinejadAfter you had protected the article, a content edit was made by Omegatron ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). The sentence affected was one of those at the core of the mediation, to which the admin was invited to join, but demurred (see User talk:Omegatron#Your edits to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad). As this may have been an accident, since the template on the page was the small version, so the admin was informed, both on his userpage at user talk:Omegatron#Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - edits to protected page and accidental abuse of sysop rights and via e-mail. As of 0942 (-500 UTC) this morning, the admin was aware of the issue, as he responded to my e-mail. In the discussion he stated that felt that mediation was not a valid reason to lock the article and that it should be unlocked, and he has not reverted the edit. At this point, even if the edit was accidental, maintaining it would appear to be a violation of the sysop right to edit protected pages. Being a party to the mediation process, I would appreciate if you could restore the article to the state it was at the lock and inform admin Omegatron as to the impropriety of making such edits. Is this something that needs to be brought up on WP:ANI? Thank you. -- Avi 16:54, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Also responded on WP:ANI#Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad_mediation_and_unilateral_edits_by_Omegatron.C2.A0.28talk.C2.A0.C2.B7_contribs.29 — Omegatron 00:16, 4 October 2007 (UTC) Hi, You have, as I requested, semi-protected my userpage rather than fully protect. However, my sub-pages are still fully protected and I cant edit them. Could you please make all of my userpages/subpages semi-protected?. Thanks -- ¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 17:57, 3 October 2007 (UTC) you protected the Mahmoud Ahmadinejad article, regardless of whether your action is justified or not, you forgot to put the "large" protection template. Cheers, -- Pejman47 20:17, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Riana. User:Hindu-Boar has started questioning the license and has been tagging the images with factual accuracy disputed. Please can you set the record straight with him and confirm its verification- he is convices it is false. PLease respond to this thanks ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 11:25, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you =D I have been contributing a lot on Norse Mythology articles, but my IPs changed randomly (^_^); I have accounts, but forgot the password, and my email's password too ;p This is the first time I see a nice person here, BTW 222.252.229.56 10:58, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
I think we could probably unprotect John Stossel. We've been working on a section to replace the disputed area - discussion and example viewable under Example. Once unprotected, we'll replace the list under the section "Controversies" with the text offered under Example. At this point, there are no objections to replacing the text and disputes have been worked out, but not everyone has commented. So I hope that we'll be able to replace it without edit wars and then tweak as needed. If it becomes an issue again, we can always reprotect it. Thanks Morphh (talk) 19:22, 06 October 2007 (UTC)
You've been loved by OneCoolKid[13] *sniff*. First the Rugby World Cup loss to England and now this Your poor sock is feeling down... -- DarkFalls talk 02:52, 7 October 2007 (UTC) Time rub it in your face after a rather embarassing Ashes... Will ( talk) 09:31, 7 October 2007 (UTC) Would it be possible to find out where this user is located? I don't appericate the comments made in this diff or this diff as they are completely false and completely uncalled for. Since the website in question was operated by me (has since been taken offline) I have had to deal with problems, lies and other crap from whoever this person is on different websites and don't wish to have deal with them here. Personally I would like to press charges (as my email accounts, website accounts, and accounts for other websites were hacked). If possible, could a block also be placed on this user's account for the time being as well? I would appericate it. Take Care.... NeutralHomer T: C 06:06, 7 October 2007 (UTC) ... seems to have taken one helluva beating! I've semiprotected it, feel free to ask me or at RFPP if you want it lifted. Cheers, ~ Riana ⁂ 12:22, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Rather than protecting a signature template like you did here, you may want to consider letting the user know that transcluding such templates is forbidden. Have a nice day. -- PEJL 13:25, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey, did you mean to protect homeopathy indefinitely? It seems like there's just one editor there who's insisting on adding a tag without adequate explanation or discussion; there appear to be a lot of other editors who are making reasonable, referenced edits to the article. TenOfAllTrades( talk) 20:03, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
( User:Whig) is arguing seriously and according to the rules . Some people from the other group too. But if you look at the talk page you will understand what it is going on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sm565 ( talk • contribs) 00:11, 8 October 2007 (UTC) The article is POV. Clearly. I tried to put a sign and it is reverted immediately. This group denies that there is another opinion in the forum. If you look at the talk pages you will see that most of the references dont support what the article states. Even the editors agreed with that. [14] [15] best wishes -- Sm565 23:59, 7 October 2007 (UTC) Hi In homeopathy talk page we attempt to put all the studies together , evaluate what they say and report. some users they dont follow our kind requests and they write directly into the studies section in order to disrupt in my opinion ....can you protect the page? thanks-- Sm565 16:22, 8 October 2007 (UTC) Hellow please take a look at what the actuall request to Blyguyn was. He claimed more socks from the Toronto Tamil club which is a assumption based on no hard facts besides that the IP's were from Toronto. This is like saying that there such a club that edits wikipedia on certain basis. It is also like implying that "Tamils" are pov pushing. As such my request is proper. Thanks Watchdogb 05:15, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Personal Attack from user NetmongerHi, I would like to report Netmonger for a personal attack made against me here. This is not the first time this has happened. He has been blocked here about a week ago for posting a harassing message on my talk page here and sending me a vulgar harassing e-mail. Thank you. Wiki Raja 05:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Riana, just to let you know that I have recreated the ROMacedonia WP with a few mods which will hopefully not lead it to the same destination as last time! I wasn't aware I was in breach of any guidelines when I recreated it -- Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) alerted me to it and suggested I let you know. I hope this is OK. I have also notifed Aecis ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). Cheers, AWN AWN2 15:41, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
The header says it all. :) Acalamari 17:54, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Did you create the account m:User:Danzilgoes on Meta? (On the user page is claimed that it is your account. "Bot run by Riana from the English Wikipedia.", Majorly deleted it meanwhile.) I blocked it infinitely for vandalism, and I hope it was not you. -- Thogo (Talk) 21:55, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
The page Probability derivations for making low hands in Omaha hold 'em that I created some time ago was deleted by User:Kurykh with the comment "CSD A5: Has been transwikied". I'm not able to find it on Wikibooks...any idea where it went? — Doug Bell 05:13, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Great news! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 32 has been released! .mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/10/09/episode-32-trust-me/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/. For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 08:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC) If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
I've been putting up as many of these as I can, and getting complaints they're too ugly and obnoxious. Per the Village Pump discussion on the subject, I plan to upload versions with slightly softened colours. Is there any problem with this? It has in fact been discussed at length, with the one thing there is consensus on being that they're just a bit too crappy-looking ... - David Gerard 19:59, 10 October 2007 (UTC) Hello Riana Noel Hidalgo is coming to Adelaide on Friday October 12 He will be at the Central Market for breakfast at Lucias 8am He is doing the http://luckofseven.com tour. He is interested in meeting open source and free culture folk around the world. Feel free to email me to check up about other times. eg. Perhaps the Richmnd Hotel upstairs after 5pm on Friday evening for coffee drinks chat kinds of things. Cheers Lucychili 21:02, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page User:Riana Test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mercury 04:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Does it make anyone else laugh that the only two "Master Editors" on Wikipedia are Riana and DarkFalls? No one else meets the criteria...they are the best (and congrats to them, by the way). Is it a good or bad thing when out of a "crapload" of editors and users only 2 of them can be considered "Master Editors"? Either way, congrats to Riana and DarkFalls, just wanted to give you all a rough time. :) - NeutralHomer T: C 06:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello, could you check permission for the Image:Daniella Alonso.jpg? I think it's suspicious because the OTRS template was added to Image:DaniellaAlonsoHillsPremiere.jpg by User:Tripplerage at uploading time. Conscious 06:52, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
I disagree with you deletion of noema. My judgement is based on the version of the entry show here (2nd section from the top), http://www.answers.com/topic/noema. In deleting the entry you wrote, "concern was: not a philosophically significant concept outside of Husserl/phenomenology, and better treated in those articles. In addition, we've got a bunch of original research here": 1. Other Wikipedia entries seem to vouch for the significance of noema outside of Husserl and phenomenology as the term appears in Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Transcendence (philosophy), Continental Philosophy, Glossary of rhetorical terms, List of philosophical topics (I-Q), List of psychology topics, and Philosophy of mind. Moreover the Philosophy of mind entry contains a "see noema" reference to the deleted entry indicating that, in Wikipedia's coverage of philosophy, it was decided that noema would be, and was, properly covered in a separate entry. 2. Even if noema would be better treated in the phenomenology or Husserl entries it clearly isn't or at least not in the general way in which it was treated in the deleted entry. And in seeing how noema was treated in a general way in the deleted entry, it seems clear that such a general treatment, as is needed for an introduction to the concept of noema, would integrate poorly as part of another entry. 3. I can't say for sure but the deleted entry sure doesn't sound like original research. Patrick Mhnin0 07:43, 11 October 2007 (UTC) *adds you to Category:Doctor editors*End of the universe! Have fun! Bye-bye! *runs while Riana watches, bemused* Will ( talk) 09:01, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
User:VivekOberoiluver needs to be deleted. It is based on Vivek Oberoi ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 11:41, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
See here. He has only made a few edits but needs to be stopped under that user name before he goes any further. Regards ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 00:03, 12 October 2007 (UTC) Hi Riana, you've got mail! :) -- Kyok o 15:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed you were involved in the revert war that has been ongoing there, so thought I would ask for your input at Talk:United Kingdom#Edit war over inclusion of Ulster Banner. I hope we can take the matter forward there. Best wishes, -- John 17:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Click there to open your card! → → →
My dear Wikipedian Riana, CreditsThis RFA thanks was inspired by The Random Editor, who in turn was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks. So unfortunately this is not entirely my own design. This end the usual RFA thanks spam. You may return to your regular editing now. A couple new episodes - we're posting the infobox to save duplicating info.
Fuzheado,
Gamaliel,
Effeietsanders,
Nikikana,
LilyOfTheWest, and
SuperHamster discuss the annual
Wiki Loves Monuments worldwide photography contest
Subscription · Feedback
Thank you for supporting my RfA, which unfortunately didn't succeed. The majority of the opposes stated that I needed more experience in the main namespace and Wikipedia namespace, so that is what I will do. I will go for another RfA in two month's time and I hope you will be able to support me then as well. If you have any other comments for me or wish to be notified when I go for another RfA, please leave them on my talk page. If you wish to nominate me for my next RfA, please wait until it has been two months. Thanks again for participating in my RfA! -- Cobi( t| c| b| cn) 00:56, 12 October 2007 (UTC) Riana, Thank you for restoring Noema. Hope I didn't offend with my vigorous rebuttal of the deletion. I should have read about prods first. My mistake. Thank you, Patrick Mhnin0 01:23, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Try adding me again (though you may have forgot that (for some reason) GTalk doesn't put you online on my contact list) :) Will ( talk) 19:38, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
|