Thank you for the support on Embodied language processing. I would not have treated it like a medical (in psychology) article except pretty much every source appeared to come out of a medical related journal. Example: Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: A combined TMS and behavioral study. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(3). How is that anything but making it fall into the domain of medical articles? -- LauraHale ( talk) 20:38, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Till I Go Home ( talk) 06:27, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
The problem you pointed out has been addressed by the article's author. Can you please check to see if this satisfies your concerns? Thanks! BlueMoonset ( talk) 20:20, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
You noted a problem with large-scale constructs in this nominated article. Aymatth2, whose article and nom it is, has requested that you cite examples. Can you give at least one to demonstrate the problems you've found in the article? Thank you. BlueMoonset ( talk) 18:06, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Nikki, would you mind giving the four images for this FAC the once-over? Tks/cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 03:29, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Nikkimaria, just to say that your edits to that article show a depth of knowledge. Nice work indeed, but unfortunately some of it seems to have been reverted for ideological reasons. I say let's stay in there for the sake of the readers, the ones who really count! Tony (talk) 10:39, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I've noted the fact the fact that you placed the Tower Logo back in the article University of Western Ontario, although I have not reverted your inclusion of it as of yet. I'm not sure if you have checked back on the article talk page but since your last response, the IP user, myself, as well as another Wikipedia user have all made it clear that (as far as we are concerned anyways) the Tower Logo does not comply with Wikipedia's non-free content policies. Please note that according to the policy, the logo must comply with all 10 of Wikipedia's criterion (the criteria's list may be found here WP:NFCC).
However, if you believe the Tower Logo does meet the listed criterion's for inclusion, please respond to the users which brought up the concern in the article's talk page. Leventio ( talk) 04:33, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Nikkimaria, can you help out with Talk:Shahrukh Khan#The ageing controversy? -- Rsrikanth05 ( talk) 18:05, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Please also remove the credit line(s) [1] (or we get DYKbot errors and double tagging). Thanks. Materialscientist ( talk) 00:12, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
I can see from your interventions in DYK that you are interested in preventing copyright violations.
When writing an article on another bivalve mollusc, I became aware that the article Grooved carpet shell uses text that is copy-pasted from this source. I do not fully understand quite what the phrase "being in the public domain" means. The original source in this instance is a FAO fact sheet and I am unsure whether it was legitimate to copy this verbatim or not. Your guidance would be welcome. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 06:31, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
I'm connecerned about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transport in Ahmedabad. The AfD was closed ten hours after nomination with only one vote by the creator of the article in question. Is that even allowed I wouldn't like to assume Good Faith here, as the editor seems to be trying to hide something. -- Rsrikanth05 ( talk) 08:15, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, my apologies for the close paraphrasing. I believe I have addressed your concerns, but would appreciate another look, if you would be so kind? Note that there is very little written account of those days, and nearly every author, myself included, have made heavy use of Jennings (1890), which is in the public domain. Thank you very much, Groll†ech ( talk) 16:20, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Nikkimaria, here's the latest batch of DYK nomination templates where you noticed paraphrasing or plagiarism issues, and the nominators write that they have fixed the problems you've cited (but sometimes with explanations that make me wonder whether they fully have been):
In addition, there are a couple involving Aymatth2:
Thank you so much for doing the close paraphrasing and plagiarism checks. They're so very important, especially because it's something so many people can't appreciate or even see in their own writing. (And so many DYK reviewers miss as well.) BlueMoonset ( talk) 18:53, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
You know policies about SPI? Can you consider helping me here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yasht101. I'm concerned just because one of the sock is not using his account anymore, but using his new account as a newbie instead. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 07:19, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Nikkimaria, I think I've redressed the issues that you pointed out concerning the images on Lynching of Jesse Washington. I swapped a couple new images in, if you have time, could you drop a note at the FAC if you have any unresolved concerns? Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:07, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Armdale.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:59, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
This was almost reapproved today. Could you please respond to the current issues, and what needs to be done to get approval? That would help a lot. Thanks.
Also, Aymatth2 has made a fix to Template:Did you know nominations/Indian People's Tribunal and explained what was done in the paragraphs above the new "More comments" header. Please reply to indicate whether this solves the paraphrasing issue. Thanks again. BlueMoonset ( talk) 16:18, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
You are invited to contribute to the discuss at Wikipedia talk:Plagiarism#Large-scale constructs. Aymatth2 ( talk) 23:11, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Astronomyinertia says he/she has made the changes needed. You are clearly better than I am on the copied text front, do you have time to check it? (Nomination is here.) Also, is there a tool you recommend using? Moonraker ( talk) 16:18, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Hey--thanks for making short work of that list-o'-cruft in The Great Santini! I was gonna leave the template for a couple of days and come back, but that hardly ever works. I like your approach better.
Thanks again! — UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 02:20, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Ed
[talk]
[majestic titan] 15:08, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
This nomination managed to get removed from the templates page by accident, and it was restored today. Before it fell off the radar, you had expressed concerns, which Gerda Arendt addressed, but the whole thing disappeared before you saw her response. However, within a few hours it's been reviewed, approved and already moved into a prep area. The reviewer does not specifically mention checks for paraphrasing, so if you want to check to see whether your concerns were addressed, there won't be much time. BlueMoonset ( talk) 00:32, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is to inform you that there is an important discussion currently at the talk page of the article Shahrukh Khan. Since you have been involved in a prior dispute related to this, your views are welcomed here. With (hopeful) consensus, we can initiate a neutrality-aimed change in the said article. Thank you. ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 15:42, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
for a strong article |
Thank you for yet another review, this time at
Ruma Maida. The article has passed FAC, making it the first Indonesian film FA.
To thank you, I am building you a Batak Toba-style house; a vacation home, if you will. Although Lake Toba is incredibly beautiful, remember to watch out for mosquitoes! — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 06:07, 31 May 2012 (UTC) |
I just wanted to let you know this article is now at WP:FAC. Link at: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Yogo sapphire/archive1. Thank you so much for helping get it there. Improvements welcome. PumpkinSky talk 00:34, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
I see you changed rights for Intoronto1125 ( talk · contribs) "from (none) to autopatrolled (restore)". Why would you restore rights to an indefinitely blocked account, reversing the action of another admin? Toddst1 ( talk) 14:28, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Max Viwe | Viwe The Max 18:05, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Nikkimaria, that's my bad - I misread some of the timestamps involved and thought the rights changing had continued after the discussion above. Mea Culpa! UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 12:05, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Nikkimaria,
I'm looking for some advice on referencing before I take an article (back) to FAC - and thought that you would be the safe person to ask. I'm just about to give the references an overhaul for Stephen_Hawking, I just wanted to make sure that I not only had them in shape for FAC, but also that I was proactive about any concerns. Certainly don't worry about answering these if you are busy. :)
So I have two main questions, first of all - Hawking signs his popular work 'Stephen Hawking' and that's well known, but he signs his scientific work 'S. W. Hawking' - even when other people on the paper get their full name (for example [2]) - given this, is it reasonable that he appears sometimes as 'S. W. Hawking' in the references and sometimes as 'Stephen Hawking' depending on the source?
Second question is that I was unsure as to whever the referencing style suites entirely notes-based (like the Hawking article was before I got involved - [3], or where the notes reference the sources (like Speech_generating_device is now. At the moment I'm thinking about kind of a half wayhouse where if something has an ISBN the note references the bibiography, and if not it stays in the notes, but I'm not sure if this would cut the mustard for FAC - what do you think?
Thanking you in advance. Fayedizard ( talk) 09:58, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
I know that you are very busy with WP:FAC, but could you please carry out a review of Ra.One before I submit it for an FAC? The peer review I opened got shut with little headway, and Brianboulton carried out a useful but not complete review. I was hoping you could give the article a thorough wash-down. I'd be really obliged since two previous FAC attempts have gone rather badly. ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 16:26, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Ah! I finally understood. So should I remove the 404 (Indian Railways) source? I'll check up on the other image. ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 17:29, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, dedomestication actually is something very different from conscious "breeding back", I don't know why that got mixed up in previous articles. Dedomestication happens when f.e. domestic bunnies get darker, smaller and faster when exposed to natural selection with predation pressure, while breeding back is the attempt of re-uniting wild traits in domestic animals via selective breeding. Dedomestication does not have to result in an animal that is equal to the previous wild type, f.e. Dingos are no wolves in a phenotypical sense. These are two fundamentally different processes, that's why I split the two articles. Regards, -- DFoidl ( talk) 22:29, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
You are one of the most frequent late queue adjusters, so I wanted to call your attention to a particularly timely hook for the next queue Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Possible_Queue_6_late_substitution_or_addition. You may want to make a late addition or substitution.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 17:02, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Dipankan ( Have a chat?) 05:56, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Even though I've somehow ended up compiling lists of nominations needing review in WT:DYK, this is one that isn't going there given the paraphrasing issues. Aymatth2 has edited the last problem spot you pointed out (on June 5, and it's in the middle of the thing because of odd bifurcations). Now that Crisco 1492 has given it the "review again" arrow, I was hoping you could check the paraphrasing once again (and add your comment at the bottom, where it'll be easier to see).
Since I'm going through the nominations page to find stalled or undone noms, I'll add any others I happen to find below, assuming I do find others. Thanks as always for your fine work finding problematic DYKs. BlueMoonset ( talk) 14:49, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
BlueMoonset ( talk) 15:07, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
I have closed Template:Did you know nominations/Indian People's Tribunal as "no consensus to promote after 60 days due to continued close paraphrasing issues" and listed the close at Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Template:Did you know nominations/Indian People's Tribunal for further review by the DYK community. Cunard ( talk) 18:38, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Kindly review this. I have put my attempt to change the text. Thanks. Dipankan ( Have a chat?) 07:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello - I wonder if you'd have time to cast your eye over what I think are the 3/4 potentially outstanding issues from your source review of the above. I summarise them below for your convenience:
As I said on the review page, your source check has been invaluable and we are very grateful. Thanks and regards. KJP1 ( talk) 20:26, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Hey, Nikki! If you have some time to review the quality of some articles, we're using the results for a really important research project that will help shape the future of the US/Canada Education Program. For a few projects, we're on a pretty tight timeline and are really eager to have many more of these articles reviewed over the next week. However, we think it's most useful to come from experienced Wikipedia editors.
I have gone through each class to prioritize for various projects, and everyone on the Education team at the Wikimedia Foundation would be extremely grateful if you could participate by reviewing a few articles ('pre' and 'post' versions). If we can rally a lot of editors to review one or two articles each day, we will be able to make the most use of this research for our tight timeline. As many of our Ambassadors have requested it, we are really eager to find out which classes have been successful according to the Wikipedian standard.
If you can spare some time, please check out these priority articles and give it a go. Even 1 or 2 a day would help immensely! JMathewson (WMF) ( talk) 02:30, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for creating this article!! I've been a fan of her mysteries for a while and added some information about them. I'm just wondering if there is anything here that would be suitable for a "Did You Know" -- it's not common for such a well-known scientist to write mysteries, and the artwork associated with Mapback #123 is really cool… I'll leave it to your better judgment. Ubelowme ( talk) 15:51, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Nikkimaria. Some time ago I nominated that article for FA. In your short review, you said that some parts have an "in-universe" or otherwise unencyclopedic tone. Recently I have made some changes in the article and would appreciate if you told me whether those issues had been addressed. If they have not been addressed, would you please offer examples of "in-universe" and unencyclopedic tone in the article. The subject is somewhat specific (folk beliefs and stories, mythology) but I suppose it can still be written in an unencyclopedic way. Vladimir ( talk) 14:43, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Nikkimaria...I believe I have addressed most of your concerns here. If you care to examine the changes since, I can send you links if you like. I appreciate you taking the time to offer your advice. I had overlooked the issues regarding reference formatting. PumpkinSky and RJHall also brought up similar and additional comments that I have addressed. Thanks again!-- MONGO 18:15, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Hey, I just wanted to follow up about sourcing issues at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cave Story/archive1. What do you think now? Axem Titanium ( talk) 14:06, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
The important consideration here, as with any article, is what is most helpful for the reader. Would you please explain to me how any user of the references benefits from being told the unsurprising news that the New York Times is owned by the New York Times Company, or from being informed even once, let alone 49 times, that the Cincinatti Enquirer belongs to Gannett? Facts such as these are not helpful at all - they're just clutter that obscures the valuable information. It isn't necessary or helpful to fill in a parameter value in the cite template just because it's there. Colonies Chris ( talk) 08:39, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Note also that Wikipedia:Citing sources#Newspaper_articles does not include publisher in the list of recommended items to include in a citation, for the very good reason that there's no benefit to it. Colonies Chris ( talk) 08:43, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- Of the examples I have seen, these edits seem fine and I don't think it would be reasonable for someone to assume that these changes would first require community consensus. Indeed, they appear to already have community consensus: guidelines for citing newspapers do not include citing the publisher. All of the examples I have seen have been of the kind to remove "Associated Newspapers Ltd" as the publisher of the Daily Mail, "The Washington Post Company" as the publisher of the The Washington Post, "MTV Networks" as the publisher of MTV News, etc. These are clearly superflous and should be non-controversial. I suggest this thread be closed.
(
←)
I don't need prior permission to make changes that are already in line with community consensus (see admin quote above). Therefore, in the spirit of
WP:BOLD, i've reinstated my changes (and other improvements). I suggest we wait and see whether there are any objections.
Colonies Chris (
talk) 15:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
hello,
could you tell me why you removed "multiconfessional" with this edit? I think it is important to mention that. Regards.-- GoP T C N 19:35, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 20 June 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article William Snyder Webb, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that when William Snyder Webb was awarded an honorary doctorate, he had to be captured before the ceremony? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Snyder Webb. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks from Wikipedia and the DYK team Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:05, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, where in the lead are "Europe" and "EU" already linked? Where else in the lead could they possibly be linked in the lead prior to the first and third sentence, which is where I am trying to return them to? I'd be grateful if you could point that out. They are not, by definition, duplicate links and they are clearly relevant and provide context, as allowed and even required by the guidelines cited, eg the contextlink section of WP:LEAD. I'm not going to edit war there or start a boring thread on the Germany talk page over something so trivial, but that begs the question as why you are so insistent on removing these links - which were there for a long time in what is a featured article - without any apparent real justification, when two editors have reverted you and when you've been 3RR-warned over similar behaviour on another country page. N-HH talk/ edits 12:41, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I saw your comments in the FA review of " Part of Me", where you criticized the use of blog entries as unreliable sources. I did give the author an explanation of why Yahoo! and such are generally considered unreliable, but there is a case where blog posts are valid sources. They would be inappropriate as factual sources, but are fine as opinion-based sources. In arts and entertainment articles, these can be cited to demonstrate critical and fan reception, which is how the article author used them. It's not correct to draw a line and say that these are by definition poor sources, one has to judge whether they're used in the correct context, and in this case, they are. Now, is there a shock when you open a page on popcrush.com and realize that it's being cited for an encyclopedia article? Sure, but it's right, no matter how weird it feels. Dementia13 ( talk) 13:20, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Hey Nikki, the New Forest pony article FA review got a little bogged down but we have it all sorted now. So, seeing as how you did an earlier review, can you give it another look through to see if you can vote to support? I'm trying to call the cavalry to get Pesky a nice gold star for that article, particularly because of all the stuff she's dealing with IRL. Obviously, if you still have concerns, we understand, but anyway... take a look? Montanabw (talk) 21:27, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Teamwork Barnstar |
For your outstanding support and dedication in getting Yogo sapphire from a new article to DYK to GA to FA and FOUR. The team effort of the uncountable people involved in getting this unique article to FA is a textbook case of teamwork in article improvement, ie, what Wikipedia should be, not what it all too often is. I can never thank everyone enough. PumpkinSky talk 23:26, 20 June 2012 (UTC) |
![]() | On 21 June 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ruth Sawtell Wallis, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the employment of Ruth Sawtell Wallis during the Depression was "unthinkable" because her husband was also a professor? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ruth Sawtell Wallis. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 16:02, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is " Loveland, Ohio". Thank you.
I invite you to provide your views at this discussion, which I think is important in clarifying when quoting or close paraphrasing is appropriate, or at least is allowed. This should not be a matter of personal preference. If close paraphrasing is not allowed in any circumstances, we need policy or guideline changes. Aymatth2 ( talk) 22:21, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. Please note I have replied in the nom page to your comments. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:42, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Ed
[talk]
[majestic titan] 19:17, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Nikki - I found your name at User:Simon Burchell/FAC foreign language reviewers as someone who can review sources in French. Would you possibly have the time to look through the sourcing on Trait du Nord, doing a few spot checks, just to make sure everything is in order? I've been working with a great editor who works mainly on the French WP, and together we've been trying to improve some of the French breed articles here in the English WP. My French is really low-level though, and her English (though much better than my French) is not perfect, so I'd like someone who speaks both languages (and understands the sourcing policies on the English WP) to take a close look at the sourcing. If you don't have time, then no biggie, but it would be really helpful before I take the article through PR and FAC. Thanks in advance, Dana boomer ( talk) 16:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the source review. I've made changes per your comments and replied on the review page. Sycamore ( talk) 08:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Nikkimaria. I noticed that you frequently do source checks at FAC.. I am currently in the final stages of preparing Grey's Anatomy for FAC, but I am uneasy about the citations. First, what is the difference between a "work" and "publisher"? Second, if I am citing an internet news website, can I still use {{ cite web}}, or do I have to use {{ cite news}}? Finally, what is the standard on wikilinking in references? I am a bit inconsistent on adding wikilinks or not adding them for the publisher/work. I hope you can answer these questions, and I apologize if I'm bothering you, TRLIJC19 ( talk) 18:07, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the horsey stuff! Are any of those available online? With regard to quantity, the more, the merrier! What I do when I get a load of stuff is read it all over several times, making notes of what things I can fit bits into (once I know I've understood it all properly), and then start slotting into suitable places. So pretty much anything you have which relates to horses (mainly in the British Isles, at the moment) will be great; ideally with links as it can be hard for me to get anything from the local library (and I don;t have JSTOR or WIley access, etc. - though I do know some folks who do have it). Pesky ( talk) 19:31, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
With a little extra encouragement, both instances of close paraphrasing you had trouble with have been fixed. Please take a look when you get the chance. Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 02:42, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi NikkiMaria, will you mind if you can review a GA which was badly reviewed yesterday. Will be great if you can put down some points which I would work on and make another GA nomination. Take your own. Was in hurry previous time, as the presidential elections in India was nearing, and that Abdul Kalam had confessed he wont be contesting. But now, I don't mind spending time for this one. Thanks in advance! -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 17:29, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
I have been asked to ping those who had done earlier reviews of the article. The FAC has slumped completely, and I've waited a week for some concrete statements. Besides, a spotcheck (whatever that is; I'm not familiar with such stuff yet) is also needed, I believe. Brianboulton made his lack of interest very clear last time, and so has Mark, who "cannot review the article" for some reason. I hope this is not canvassing; I'm just eager to see some progress. Cheers. ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 12:21, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited James N. Miller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Secretary of Defence ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:50, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi. :) I was working on G5ing, but I just realized that you have systematically visited culling them. I don't always G5, but I can't figure out how to get Billy to stop other than making it completely unrewarding for him to continue creating these socks and editing. But if you would rather I didn't, I'm not going to proceed with it. Stubbing them may suffice. What do you think? -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:03, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
We have put the Dan Leno discography up for peer review here. We would like to improve this to FL and would be grateful for any and all comments! -- Ssilvers ( talk) 00:53, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Is now featured. I deeply appreciate your suggestions to help make it a better article.-- MONGO 01:22, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Some changes have been made to the article since you last commented. Do you have any more input to provide here?-- The Devil's Advocate ( talk) 16:46, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
You put this "on hold" after I posted it about three weeks ago. Nothing has happened to that article since, and it sorely fails FA standards just from looking at it (and even if it didn't, I would say a review after five years' time is worth having). So....what happens now? You said I could "readd" it, well, obviously I don't know what I'm doing, so...help, please. Green-eyed girl ( Talk · Contribs) 16:25, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Nikki, you may be planning to get to it at some stage anyway, but if you review this for sources, can you also just join in the image discussion initiated by Rupert? Tks/cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 04:22, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
The status quo did not begin when you blanked essays from that template. It existed for years before you came along. If you insist on "one month" as an arbitrary measurement, then I last added an essay about a month before you went in and started deleting, so THAT is the status quo. Please make a legitimate rationale for deleting a lot of essays, some of which have been there for years, instead of engaging in slow revert wars. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 21:13, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
Nikkimaria, I was looking to promote Template:Did you know nominations/Alfredo Zalce today, and instead found what's either extremely close paraphrasing or copyvio. The problem is that I'm not sure what to do in this case, beyond the obvious DYK-based provisional "no". The article was nominated by someone other than the creator, and said creator has just stopped by to suggest that the nomination simply be withdrawn.
I don't believe that the article should simply be left the way it is even if it is withdrawn from DYK; what I don't know is what ought to be done next, since I'm not used to judging what's merely close paraphrasing, and what's copyvio. The latter process seems major and involved; could you please take a look and let me know what category this falls under, and the proper next step for it would be? Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 02:25, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for participating in my RFA! I appreciate your support. Zagalejo ^^^ 06:22, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
WikiWomen's Luncheon at Wikimania - You are invited! | |
---|---|
Are you a woman attending Wikimania 2012? If so, join us on Saturday, July 14, for the annual WikiWomen's Luncheon (fka WikiChix Lunch) This event is for any women attending Wikimania. Pick up your lunch, compliments of Wikimania, and join us at 1:30pm in the Grand Ballroom for a lively facilitated discussion hosted by Sue Gardner. We look forward to seeing you there. Please sign up
here. Sarah ( talk) 14:16, 4 July 2012 (UTC) |
It is understandable if you are not interested in my request to you, but I believe it to be good manners to make that disinterest known to the requester, something you have failed to do till date. Also, if you are not interested in communicating with me at all, please say so and I shall not contact you again. It is called "politeness". ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 05:03, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 5 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Whitewater (POW camp), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that internees at Whitewater went on strike because they thought the guards stole their pajamas? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Whitewater (POW camp). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 16:04, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
I've tried to address the legitimate concerns you raised. Could you take a look when you can? Thanks. -- JohnPomeranz ( talk) 18:50, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The WikiChevrons | |
By order of the Military History WikiProject coordinators, for your devoted contributions to the WikiProject's Peer, A-Class and Featured Article reviews for the second quarter of 2012, I am delighted to award you the WikiChevrons. - Dank ( push to talk) 18:59, 5 July 2012 (UTC) |
Hi Nikkimaria. I just wanted to talk about the Whitewater PoW Camp page that you started and wanted to explain my edit. First off, thanks for creating this article, it's something that is needed! I'm a history student working in Riding Mountain National Park and I've been studying this particular camp for the last five years. I edited the original post to ensure the accuracy of the camp's description and I hope I did not offend you. However I feel that there are some things in the original post that should be changed and I tried addressing them in my edit. Looking forward to hearing from you and working on this. Thanks! Msohagan ( talk) 04:08, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi. In reviewing articles yesterday at WP:DYK, I found at least three that I can remember with potential plagiarism. In all three cases, the problems now have been stated to be resolved. Can you look at them and give second opinions on them? One involved India, one Bahrain and then one was Template:Did you know nominations/My Ancestors Were Rogues and Murderers. -- LauraHale ( talk) 20:19, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Content Review Medal of Merit | |
By order of the Military History WikiProject coordinators, for your devoted work on the WikiProject's Peer, A-Class and Featured Article Candidate reviews for the second quarter of 2012, I am delighted to award you this Content Review Medal. - Hawkeye7 ( talk) 21:05, 7 July 2012 (UTC) |
Hi, I've recentlye got the whole Part of Me FA review cleared up and I would greatly appreciate if you would continue the review if you're willing to thanks! , teman13 TALK CONTRIBUTIONS 21:59, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
|
The Military history A-Class medal | |
On behalf of the coordinators of the Military history WikiProject, I'm pleased to award you the A-Class medal for your outstanding work on If Day, Ray Farquharson and Melville Island (Nova Scotia), which were promoted between September 2011 and June 2012. Nick-D ( talk) 23:46, 7 July 2012 (UTC) |
Thanks for looking at those DYKs. :D
LauraHale (
talk) 02:56, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Rcsprinter (yak) @ 15:59, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
As per your directions, I contacted an administrator at Commons regarding the dead link source for the India map used in Ra.One. The discussion is here; the last paragraph concerns you the most. Please take a look. Also, would you be so kind as to give a solid Support/Oppose for the FAC? I know I'm begging, but I'm terribly eager for this article since it may be my first FAC. Thanks. ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 16:34, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
I have opened a discussion here on what should be included in the Territorial_evolution_of_Canada article. Your comments would be appreciated. Thanks, Ground Zero | t 09:14, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the image; however, I don't understand. The image wasn't working earlier. And I tried searching for it... BigJoeRockHead ( talk) 00:22, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Nikki, I've answered two of your questions with questions (regarding the best course of action). Could you reply there? Thanks. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 05:24, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 11 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Eaton's catalogue, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the " Family Bible" was used as toilet paper? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eaton's catalogue. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 08:02, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Done mos of what you asked, just dont understand one point Lihaas ( talk) 11:14, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Nikkimaria, could you please take a look at this? Even though it's using NASA material, enormous chunks have been lifted wholesale, word for word, with only a footnote to indicate anything at all. Even aside from whether there might be 1500 characters of original prose left over, I have major concerns regarding copyvio/plagiarism even beyond the proper quoting and attribution. Thanks.
PS: Lihaas has responded to you in Template:Did you know nominations/2012 SCO summit. BlueMoonset ( talk) 14:34, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Nikkimaria, I've opened a discussion at this thread that you may wish to comment at (and so might all those who watch your talk page). It's likely at some point that I will specifically quote your wording of "Yep - this case does not constitute a copyright violation. However, it is also not well paraphrased" ( 00:58 18 May) as an example of views on paraphrasing, plagiarism, copyvio, that whole messy area. I have no problem with the concerns you initially raised with that article (and as I note in my comment, with higher standards for any "featured" en:wiki venue or award) - just interested in your views on what lines should be drawn, who should draw them, the whole what is our true purpose thing. ;) Thanks & regards! Franamax ( talk) 03:53, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
HI Nikki
Welcome to DC!! And thanks for helping my students with their Wikipedia projects this summer. They are all going to introduce themselves today.
Pfancher ( talk) 12:25, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Jambo! My name is Benjamin Glover and I'm sure it will be a pleasure working with you. Thank you. Benjios ( talk) 13:47, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello my name is Patricia Fedele and a rising senior at Clemson University. Can't wait to work with you on this project!
Laxfangirl (
talk) 20:44, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello! My name is Jacob Whitworth and I am a Sophomore at Clemson University. I cannot wait to get started working with you as well! JacobWhitworth ( talk) 19:29, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi my name is Wilder Allen. I will be a sophomore at Clemson. I am looking forward to working with you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilderallen420 ( talk • contribs) 02:45, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello, my name is Greg Outlaw. I'm a rising sophomore at Clemson University. I'm looking forward to working with you on this project. Goutlaw ( talk) 03:25, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Some days ago you made an image review at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/May Revolution/archive5. I think your concerns have been filled. Can you check it back? Cambalachero ( talk) 00:16, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
With regards to you observation at Wikipedia talk:Citing sources#Bundling citations please see Wikipedia talk:Good article criteria#Footnote ordering -- PBS ( talk) 07:53, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
If I somehow don't run into you today ... I'll be in the hall after the last sessions are over, a little after 4:30, to round people up for a Milhist dinner, hope you can make it. - Dank ( push to talk) 12:30, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Nikki, why did you feature this feedback? Callanecc ( talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 13:31, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
You noted some close paraphrasing and fact issues with this. There have been some edits since, one from the original author and a couple of others, and I've done a bit of work on another paraphrasing segment. Can you please recheck to see whether it's okay to approve, and give it the appropriate icon whether approved or not? Thank you. BlueMoonset ( talk) 15:23, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
I was wondering where the double periods are on Awake (TV series). Other comments have been left on the FAC page. Thanks for you comments! TBran dl ey 03:59, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
On the FAC page for Awake (TV series), I have removed one of the two Science Fiction sources; I kept one as it is an interview, and I can't find any replacement source for that other one, which is in the "Casting" section. Have also removed the Cinema Blend per the FAC, it isn't really a good source, doesn't really seem like it. Per the FAC, I have not removed the TV Fanatic review/source; as in the FAC, "Although I agree with TBrandley that TV Fanatic is a reliable source, based on its website", that's mainly why. I have decied to remove the Zap2it source; I replaced it with a source from TV by the Numbers, which is actually owned by Zap2it. Also, I didn't removed the Voice of TV source; I believe is should be fine, and can't be replacement from what I find anyway. If there are any concerns that haven't been done probably, or are outstanding enough to not promote for FA, please let me know. Thanks for your time! TBran dl ey 04:19, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Its me. Zell Faze ( talk) 04:52, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello Nikkimaria, A few days ago you left some comments on the Dorset article here, to which I replied. Were you intending to undertake a full review of the article or were you merely making some helpful suggestions? There has been a disappointing amount of interest and I am wondering whether it may have been passed over because it appears you have started. I understand if you don't wish to continue with the review and thank you for your remarks you have made but do you have any ideas how we might start the ball rolling again? I have left a message at WT:UKGEO. Best regards-- Ykraps ( talk) 08:41, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Can you do a quick follow up with Template:Did you know nominations/Goéry Delacôte? Thanks. :) -- LauraHale ( talk) 02:52, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
hello, i was editing Teun Voeten wiki page and i have seen on the page history that you add the copypste note on the article. i don't think that anything important has been copypaste, but what do you think i hall do to solve this problem? which part exactly do you think have to be change? Ransfortstraat ( talk) 10:22, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for the support on Embodied language processing. I would not have treated it like a medical (in psychology) article except pretty much every source appeared to come out of a medical related journal. Example: Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: A combined TMS and behavioral study. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(3). How is that anything but making it fall into the domain of medical articles? -- LauraHale ( talk) 20:38, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Till I Go Home ( talk) 06:27, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
The problem you pointed out has been addressed by the article's author. Can you please check to see if this satisfies your concerns? Thanks! BlueMoonset ( talk) 20:20, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
You noted a problem with large-scale constructs in this nominated article. Aymatth2, whose article and nom it is, has requested that you cite examples. Can you give at least one to demonstrate the problems you've found in the article? Thank you. BlueMoonset ( talk) 18:06, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Nikki, would you mind giving the four images for this FAC the once-over? Tks/cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 03:29, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Nikkimaria, just to say that your edits to that article show a depth of knowledge. Nice work indeed, but unfortunately some of it seems to have been reverted for ideological reasons. I say let's stay in there for the sake of the readers, the ones who really count! Tony (talk) 10:39, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I've noted the fact the fact that you placed the Tower Logo back in the article University of Western Ontario, although I have not reverted your inclusion of it as of yet. I'm not sure if you have checked back on the article talk page but since your last response, the IP user, myself, as well as another Wikipedia user have all made it clear that (as far as we are concerned anyways) the Tower Logo does not comply with Wikipedia's non-free content policies. Please note that according to the policy, the logo must comply with all 10 of Wikipedia's criterion (the criteria's list may be found here WP:NFCC).
However, if you believe the Tower Logo does meet the listed criterion's for inclusion, please respond to the users which brought up the concern in the article's talk page. Leventio ( talk) 04:33, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Nikkimaria, can you help out with Talk:Shahrukh Khan#The ageing controversy? -- Rsrikanth05 ( talk) 18:05, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Please also remove the credit line(s) [1] (or we get DYKbot errors and double tagging). Thanks. Materialscientist ( talk) 00:12, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
I can see from your interventions in DYK that you are interested in preventing copyright violations.
When writing an article on another bivalve mollusc, I became aware that the article Grooved carpet shell uses text that is copy-pasted from this source. I do not fully understand quite what the phrase "being in the public domain" means. The original source in this instance is a FAO fact sheet and I am unsure whether it was legitimate to copy this verbatim or not. Your guidance would be welcome. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 06:31, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
I'm connecerned about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transport in Ahmedabad. The AfD was closed ten hours after nomination with only one vote by the creator of the article in question. Is that even allowed I wouldn't like to assume Good Faith here, as the editor seems to be trying to hide something. -- Rsrikanth05 ( talk) 08:15, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, my apologies for the close paraphrasing. I believe I have addressed your concerns, but would appreciate another look, if you would be so kind? Note that there is very little written account of those days, and nearly every author, myself included, have made heavy use of Jennings (1890), which is in the public domain. Thank you very much, Groll†ech ( talk) 16:20, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Nikkimaria, here's the latest batch of DYK nomination templates where you noticed paraphrasing or plagiarism issues, and the nominators write that they have fixed the problems you've cited (but sometimes with explanations that make me wonder whether they fully have been):
In addition, there are a couple involving Aymatth2:
Thank you so much for doing the close paraphrasing and plagiarism checks. They're so very important, especially because it's something so many people can't appreciate or even see in their own writing. (And so many DYK reviewers miss as well.) BlueMoonset ( talk) 18:53, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
You know policies about SPI? Can you consider helping me here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yasht101. I'm concerned just because one of the sock is not using his account anymore, but using his new account as a newbie instead. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 07:19, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Nikkimaria, I think I've redressed the issues that you pointed out concerning the images on Lynching of Jesse Washington. I swapped a couple new images in, if you have time, could you drop a note at the FAC if you have any unresolved concerns? Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:07, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Armdale.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:59, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
This was almost reapproved today. Could you please respond to the current issues, and what needs to be done to get approval? That would help a lot. Thanks.
Also, Aymatth2 has made a fix to Template:Did you know nominations/Indian People's Tribunal and explained what was done in the paragraphs above the new "More comments" header. Please reply to indicate whether this solves the paraphrasing issue. Thanks again. BlueMoonset ( talk) 16:18, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
You are invited to contribute to the discuss at Wikipedia talk:Plagiarism#Large-scale constructs. Aymatth2 ( talk) 23:11, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Astronomyinertia says he/she has made the changes needed. You are clearly better than I am on the copied text front, do you have time to check it? (Nomination is here.) Also, is there a tool you recommend using? Moonraker ( talk) 16:18, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Hey--thanks for making short work of that list-o'-cruft in The Great Santini! I was gonna leave the template for a couple of days and come back, but that hardly ever works. I like your approach better.
Thanks again! — UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 02:20, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Ed
[talk]
[majestic titan] 15:08, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
This nomination managed to get removed from the templates page by accident, and it was restored today. Before it fell off the radar, you had expressed concerns, which Gerda Arendt addressed, but the whole thing disappeared before you saw her response. However, within a few hours it's been reviewed, approved and already moved into a prep area. The reviewer does not specifically mention checks for paraphrasing, so if you want to check to see whether your concerns were addressed, there won't be much time. BlueMoonset ( talk) 00:32, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is to inform you that there is an important discussion currently at the talk page of the article Shahrukh Khan. Since you have been involved in a prior dispute related to this, your views are welcomed here. With (hopeful) consensus, we can initiate a neutrality-aimed change in the said article. Thank you. ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 15:42, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
for a strong article |
Thank you for yet another review, this time at
Ruma Maida. The article has passed FAC, making it the first Indonesian film FA.
To thank you, I am building you a Batak Toba-style house; a vacation home, if you will. Although Lake Toba is incredibly beautiful, remember to watch out for mosquitoes! — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 06:07, 31 May 2012 (UTC) |
I just wanted to let you know this article is now at WP:FAC. Link at: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Yogo sapphire/archive1. Thank you so much for helping get it there. Improvements welcome. PumpkinSky talk 00:34, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
I see you changed rights for Intoronto1125 ( talk · contribs) "from (none) to autopatrolled (restore)". Why would you restore rights to an indefinitely blocked account, reversing the action of another admin? Toddst1 ( talk) 14:28, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Max Viwe | Viwe The Max 18:05, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Nikkimaria, that's my bad - I misread some of the timestamps involved and thought the rights changing had continued after the discussion above. Mea Culpa! UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 12:05, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Nikkimaria,
I'm looking for some advice on referencing before I take an article (back) to FAC - and thought that you would be the safe person to ask. I'm just about to give the references an overhaul for Stephen_Hawking, I just wanted to make sure that I not only had them in shape for FAC, but also that I was proactive about any concerns. Certainly don't worry about answering these if you are busy. :)
So I have two main questions, first of all - Hawking signs his popular work 'Stephen Hawking' and that's well known, but he signs his scientific work 'S. W. Hawking' - even when other people on the paper get their full name (for example [2]) - given this, is it reasonable that he appears sometimes as 'S. W. Hawking' in the references and sometimes as 'Stephen Hawking' depending on the source?
Second question is that I was unsure as to whever the referencing style suites entirely notes-based (like the Hawking article was before I got involved - [3], or where the notes reference the sources (like Speech_generating_device is now. At the moment I'm thinking about kind of a half wayhouse where if something has an ISBN the note references the bibiography, and if not it stays in the notes, but I'm not sure if this would cut the mustard for FAC - what do you think?
Thanking you in advance. Fayedizard ( talk) 09:58, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
I know that you are very busy with WP:FAC, but could you please carry out a review of Ra.One before I submit it for an FAC? The peer review I opened got shut with little headway, and Brianboulton carried out a useful but not complete review. I was hoping you could give the article a thorough wash-down. I'd be really obliged since two previous FAC attempts have gone rather badly. ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 16:26, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Ah! I finally understood. So should I remove the 404 (Indian Railways) source? I'll check up on the other image. ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 17:29, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, dedomestication actually is something very different from conscious "breeding back", I don't know why that got mixed up in previous articles. Dedomestication happens when f.e. domestic bunnies get darker, smaller and faster when exposed to natural selection with predation pressure, while breeding back is the attempt of re-uniting wild traits in domestic animals via selective breeding. Dedomestication does not have to result in an animal that is equal to the previous wild type, f.e. Dingos are no wolves in a phenotypical sense. These are two fundamentally different processes, that's why I split the two articles. Regards, -- DFoidl ( talk) 22:29, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
You are one of the most frequent late queue adjusters, so I wanted to call your attention to a particularly timely hook for the next queue Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Possible_Queue_6_late_substitution_or_addition. You may want to make a late addition or substitution.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 17:02, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Dipankan ( Have a chat?) 05:56, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Even though I've somehow ended up compiling lists of nominations needing review in WT:DYK, this is one that isn't going there given the paraphrasing issues. Aymatth2 has edited the last problem spot you pointed out (on June 5, and it's in the middle of the thing because of odd bifurcations). Now that Crisco 1492 has given it the "review again" arrow, I was hoping you could check the paraphrasing once again (and add your comment at the bottom, where it'll be easier to see).
Since I'm going through the nominations page to find stalled or undone noms, I'll add any others I happen to find below, assuming I do find others. Thanks as always for your fine work finding problematic DYKs. BlueMoonset ( talk) 14:49, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
BlueMoonset ( talk) 15:07, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
I have closed Template:Did you know nominations/Indian People's Tribunal as "no consensus to promote after 60 days due to continued close paraphrasing issues" and listed the close at Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Template:Did you know nominations/Indian People's Tribunal for further review by the DYK community. Cunard ( talk) 18:38, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Kindly review this. I have put my attempt to change the text. Thanks. Dipankan ( Have a chat?) 07:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello - I wonder if you'd have time to cast your eye over what I think are the 3/4 potentially outstanding issues from your source review of the above. I summarise them below for your convenience:
As I said on the review page, your source check has been invaluable and we are very grateful. Thanks and regards. KJP1 ( talk) 20:26, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Hey, Nikki! If you have some time to review the quality of some articles, we're using the results for a really important research project that will help shape the future of the US/Canada Education Program. For a few projects, we're on a pretty tight timeline and are really eager to have many more of these articles reviewed over the next week. However, we think it's most useful to come from experienced Wikipedia editors.
I have gone through each class to prioritize for various projects, and everyone on the Education team at the Wikimedia Foundation would be extremely grateful if you could participate by reviewing a few articles ('pre' and 'post' versions). If we can rally a lot of editors to review one or two articles each day, we will be able to make the most use of this research for our tight timeline. As many of our Ambassadors have requested it, we are really eager to find out which classes have been successful according to the Wikipedian standard.
If you can spare some time, please check out these priority articles and give it a go. Even 1 or 2 a day would help immensely! JMathewson (WMF) ( talk) 02:30, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for creating this article!! I've been a fan of her mysteries for a while and added some information about them. I'm just wondering if there is anything here that would be suitable for a "Did You Know" -- it's not common for such a well-known scientist to write mysteries, and the artwork associated with Mapback #123 is really cool… I'll leave it to your better judgment. Ubelowme ( talk) 15:51, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Nikkimaria. Some time ago I nominated that article for FA. In your short review, you said that some parts have an "in-universe" or otherwise unencyclopedic tone. Recently I have made some changes in the article and would appreciate if you told me whether those issues had been addressed. If they have not been addressed, would you please offer examples of "in-universe" and unencyclopedic tone in the article. The subject is somewhat specific (folk beliefs and stories, mythology) but I suppose it can still be written in an unencyclopedic way. Vladimir ( talk) 14:43, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Nikkimaria...I believe I have addressed most of your concerns here. If you care to examine the changes since, I can send you links if you like. I appreciate you taking the time to offer your advice. I had overlooked the issues regarding reference formatting. PumpkinSky and RJHall also brought up similar and additional comments that I have addressed. Thanks again!-- MONGO 18:15, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Hey, I just wanted to follow up about sourcing issues at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cave Story/archive1. What do you think now? Axem Titanium ( talk) 14:06, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
The important consideration here, as with any article, is what is most helpful for the reader. Would you please explain to me how any user of the references benefits from being told the unsurprising news that the New York Times is owned by the New York Times Company, or from being informed even once, let alone 49 times, that the Cincinatti Enquirer belongs to Gannett? Facts such as these are not helpful at all - they're just clutter that obscures the valuable information. It isn't necessary or helpful to fill in a parameter value in the cite template just because it's there. Colonies Chris ( talk) 08:39, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Note also that Wikipedia:Citing sources#Newspaper_articles does not include publisher in the list of recommended items to include in a citation, for the very good reason that there's no benefit to it. Colonies Chris ( talk) 08:43, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- Of the examples I have seen, these edits seem fine and I don't think it would be reasonable for someone to assume that these changes would first require community consensus. Indeed, they appear to already have community consensus: guidelines for citing newspapers do not include citing the publisher. All of the examples I have seen have been of the kind to remove "Associated Newspapers Ltd" as the publisher of the Daily Mail, "The Washington Post Company" as the publisher of the The Washington Post, "MTV Networks" as the publisher of MTV News, etc. These are clearly superflous and should be non-controversial. I suggest this thread be closed.
(
←)
I don't need prior permission to make changes that are already in line with community consensus (see admin quote above). Therefore, in the spirit of
WP:BOLD, i've reinstated my changes (and other improvements). I suggest we wait and see whether there are any objections.
Colonies Chris (
talk) 15:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
hello,
could you tell me why you removed "multiconfessional" with this edit? I think it is important to mention that. Regards.-- GoP T C N 19:35, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 20 June 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article William Snyder Webb, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that when William Snyder Webb was awarded an honorary doctorate, he had to be captured before the ceremony? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Snyder Webb. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks from Wikipedia and the DYK team Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:05, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, where in the lead are "Europe" and "EU" already linked? Where else in the lead could they possibly be linked in the lead prior to the first and third sentence, which is where I am trying to return them to? I'd be grateful if you could point that out. They are not, by definition, duplicate links and they are clearly relevant and provide context, as allowed and even required by the guidelines cited, eg the contextlink section of WP:LEAD. I'm not going to edit war there or start a boring thread on the Germany talk page over something so trivial, but that begs the question as why you are so insistent on removing these links - which were there for a long time in what is a featured article - without any apparent real justification, when two editors have reverted you and when you've been 3RR-warned over similar behaviour on another country page. N-HH talk/ edits 12:41, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I saw your comments in the FA review of " Part of Me", where you criticized the use of blog entries as unreliable sources. I did give the author an explanation of why Yahoo! and such are generally considered unreliable, but there is a case where blog posts are valid sources. They would be inappropriate as factual sources, but are fine as opinion-based sources. In arts and entertainment articles, these can be cited to demonstrate critical and fan reception, which is how the article author used them. It's not correct to draw a line and say that these are by definition poor sources, one has to judge whether they're used in the correct context, and in this case, they are. Now, is there a shock when you open a page on popcrush.com and realize that it's being cited for an encyclopedia article? Sure, but it's right, no matter how weird it feels. Dementia13 ( talk) 13:20, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Hey Nikki, the New Forest pony article FA review got a little bogged down but we have it all sorted now. So, seeing as how you did an earlier review, can you give it another look through to see if you can vote to support? I'm trying to call the cavalry to get Pesky a nice gold star for that article, particularly because of all the stuff she's dealing with IRL. Obviously, if you still have concerns, we understand, but anyway... take a look? Montanabw (talk) 21:27, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Teamwork Barnstar |
For your outstanding support and dedication in getting Yogo sapphire from a new article to DYK to GA to FA and FOUR. The team effort of the uncountable people involved in getting this unique article to FA is a textbook case of teamwork in article improvement, ie, what Wikipedia should be, not what it all too often is. I can never thank everyone enough. PumpkinSky talk 23:26, 20 June 2012 (UTC) |
![]() | On 21 June 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ruth Sawtell Wallis, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the employment of Ruth Sawtell Wallis during the Depression was "unthinkable" because her husband was also a professor? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ruth Sawtell Wallis. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 16:02, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is " Loveland, Ohio". Thank you.
I invite you to provide your views at this discussion, which I think is important in clarifying when quoting or close paraphrasing is appropriate, or at least is allowed. This should not be a matter of personal preference. If close paraphrasing is not allowed in any circumstances, we need policy or guideline changes. Aymatth2 ( talk) 22:21, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. Please note I have replied in the nom page to your comments. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:42, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Ed
[talk]
[majestic titan] 19:17, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Nikki - I found your name at User:Simon Burchell/FAC foreign language reviewers as someone who can review sources in French. Would you possibly have the time to look through the sourcing on Trait du Nord, doing a few spot checks, just to make sure everything is in order? I've been working with a great editor who works mainly on the French WP, and together we've been trying to improve some of the French breed articles here in the English WP. My French is really low-level though, and her English (though much better than my French) is not perfect, so I'd like someone who speaks both languages (and understands the sourcing policies on the English WP) to take a close look at the sourcing. If you don't have time, then no biggie, but it would be really helpful before I take the article through PR and FAC. Thanks in advance, Dana boomer ( talk) 16:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the source review. I've made changes per your comments and replied on the review page. Sycamore ( talk) 08:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Nikkimaria. I noticed that you frequently do source checks at FAC.. I am currently in the final stages of preparing Grey's Anatomy for FAC, but I am uneasy about the citations. First, what is the difference between a "work" and "publisher"? Second, if I am citing an internet news website, can I still use {{ cite web}}, or do I have to use {{ cite news}}? Finally, what is the standard on wikilinking in references? I am a bit inconsistent on adding wikilinks or not adding them for the publisher/work. I hope you can answer these questions, and I apologize if I'm bothering you, TRLIJC19 ( talk) 18:07, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the horsey stuff! Are any of those available online? With regard to quantity, the more, the merrier! What I do when I get a load of stuff is read it all over several times, making notes of what things I can fit bits into (once I know I've understood it all properly), and then start slotting into suitable places. So pretty much anything you have which relates to horses (mainly in the British Isles, at the moment) will be great; ideally with links as it can be hard for me to get anything from the local library (and I don;t have JSTOR or WIley access, etc. - though I do know some folks who do have it). Pesky ( talk) 19:31, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
With a little extra encouragement, both instances of close paraphrasing you had trouble with have been fixed. Please take a look when you get the chance. Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 02:42, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi NikkiMaria, will you mind if you can review a GA which was badly reviewed yesterday. Will be great if you can put down some points which I would work on and make another GA nomination. Take your own. Was in hurry previous time, as the presidential elections in India was nearing, and that Abdul Kalam had confessed he wont be contesting. But now, I don't mind spending time for this one. Thanks in advance! -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 17:29, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
I have been asked to ping those who had done earlier reviews of the article. The FAC has slumped completely, and I've waited a week for some concrete statements. Besides, a spotcheck (whatever that is; I'm not familiar with such stuff yet) is also needed, I believe. Brianboulton made his lack of interest very clear last time, and so has Mark, who "cannot review the article" for some reason. I hope this is not canvassing; I'm just eager to see some progress. Cheers. ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 12:21, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited James N. Miller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Secretary of Defence ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:50, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi. :) I was working on G5ing, but I just realized that you have systematically visited culling them. I don't always G5, but I can't figure out how to get Billy to stop other than making it completely unrewarding for him to continue creating these socks and editing. But if you would rather I didn't, I'm not going to proceed with it. Stubbing them may suffice. What do you think? -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:03, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
We have put the Dan Leno discography up for peer review here. We would like to improve this to FL and would be grateful for any and all comments! -- Ssilvers ( talk) 00:53, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Is now featured. I deeply appreciate your suggestions to help make it a better article.-- MONGO 01:22, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Some changes have been made to the article since you last commented. Do you have any more input to provide here?-- The Devil's Advocate ( talk) 16:46, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
You put this "on hold" after I posted it about three weeks ago. Nothing has happened to that article since, and it sorely fails FA standards just from looking at it (and even if it didn't, I would say a review after five years' time is worth having). So....what happens now? You said I could "readd" it, well, obviously I don't know what I'm doing, so...help, please. Green-eyed girl ( Talk · Contribs) 16:25, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Nikki, you may be planning to get to it at some stage anyway, but if you review this for sources, can you also just join in the image discussion initiated by Rupert? Tks/cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 04:22, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
The status quo did not begin when you blanked essays from that template. It existed for years before you came along. If you insist on "one month" as an arbitrary measurement, then I last added an essay about a month before you went in and started deleting, so THAT is the status quo. Please make a legitimate rationale for deleting a lot of essays, some of which have been there for years, instead of engaging in slow revert wars. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 21:13, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
Nikkimaria, I was looking to promote Template:Did you know nominations/Alfredo Zalce today, and instead found what's either extremely close paraphrasing or copyvio. The problem is that I'm not sure what to do in this case, beyond the obvious DYK-based provisional "no". The article was nominated by someone other than the creator, and said creator has just stopped by to suggest that the nomination simply be withdrawn.
I don't believe that the article should simply be left the way it is even if it is withdrawn from DYK; what I don't know is what ought to be done next, since I'm not used to judging what's merely close paraphrasing, and what's copyvio. The latter process seems major and involved; could you please take a look and let me know what category this falls under, and the proper next step for it would be? Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 02:25, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for participating in my RFA! I appreciate your support. Zagalejo ^^^ 06:22, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
WikiWomen's Luncheon at Wikimania - You are invited! | |
---|---|
Are you a woman attending Wikimania 2012? If so, join us on Saturday, July 14, for the annual WikiWomen's Luncheon (fka WikiChix Lunch) This event is for any women attending Wikimania. Pick up your lunch, compliments of Wikimania, and join us at 1:30pm in the Grand Ballroom for a lively facilitated discussion hosted by Sue Gardner. We look forward to seeing you there. Please sign up
here. Sarah ( talk) 14:16, 4 July 2012 (UTC) |
It is understandable if you are not interested in my request to you, but I believe it to be good manners to make that disinterest known to the requester, something you have failed to do till date. Also, if you are not interested in communicating with me at all, please say so and I shall not contact you again. It is called "politeness". ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 05:03, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 5 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Whitewater (POW camp), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that internees at Whitewater went on strike because they thought the guards stole their pajamas? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Whitewater (POW camp). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 16:04, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
I've tried to address the legitimate concerns you raised. Could you take a look when you can? Thanks. -- JohnPomeranz ( talk) 18:50, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The WikiChevrons | |
By order of the Military History WikiProject coordinators, for your devoted contributions to the WikiProject's Peer, A-Class and Featured Article reviews for the second quarter of 2012, I am delighted to award you the WikiChevrons. - Dank ( push to talk) 18:59, 5 July 2012 (UTC) |
Hi Nikkimaria. I just wanted to talk about the Whitewater PoW Camp page that you started and wanted to explain my edit. First off, thanks for creating this article, it's something that is needed! I'm a history student working in Riding Mountain National Park and I've been studying this particular camp for the last five years. I edited the original post to ensure the accuracy of the camp's description and I hope I did not offend you. However I feel that there are some things in the original post that should be changed and I tried addressing them in my edit. Looking forward to hearing from you and working on this. Thanks! Msohagan ( talk) 04:08, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi. In reviewing articles yesterday at WP:DYK, I found at least three that I can remember with potential plagiarism. In all three cases, the problems now have been stated to be resolved. Can you look at them and give second opinions on them? One involved India, one Bahrain and then one was Template:Did you know nominations/My Ancestors Were Rogues and Murderers. -- LauraHale ( talk) 20:19, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Content Review Medal of Merit | |
By order of the Military History WikiProject coordinators, for your devoted work on the WikiProject's Peer, A-Class and Featured Article Candidate reviews for the second quarter of 2012, I am delighted to award you this Content Review Medal. - Hawkeye7 ( talk) 21:05, 7 July 2012 (UTC) |
Hi, I've recentlye got the whole Part of Me FA review cleared up and I would greatly appreciate if you would continue the review if you're willing to thanks! , teman13 TALK CONTRIBUTIONS 21:59, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
|
The Military history A-Class medal | |
On behalf of the coordinators of the Military history WikiProject, I'm pleased to award you the A-Class medal for your outstanding work on If Day, Ray Farquharson and Melville Island (Nova Scotia), which were promoted between September 2011 and June 2012. Nick-D ( talk) 23:46, 7 July 2012 (UTC) |
Thanks for looking at those DYKs. :D
LauraHale (
talk) 02:56, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Rcsprinter (yak) @ 15:59, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
As per your directions, I contacted an administrator at Commons regarding the dead link source for the India map used in Ra.One. The discussion is here; the last paragraph concerns you the most. Please take a look. Also, would you be so kind as to give a solid Support/Oppose for the FAC? I know I'm begging, but I'm terribly eager for this article since it may be my first FAC. Thanks. ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 16:34, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
I have opened a discussion here on what should be included in the Territorial_evolution_of_Canada article. Your comments would be appreciated. Thanks, Ground Zero | t 09:14, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the image; however, I don't understand. The image wasn't working earlier. And I tried searching for it... BigJoeRockHead ( talk) 00:22, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Nikki, I've answered two of your questions with questions (regarding the best course of action). Could you reply there? Thanks. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 05:24, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 11 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Eaton's catalogue, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the " Family Bible" was used as toilet paper? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eaton's catalogue. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 08:02, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Done mos of what you asked, just dont understand one point Lihaas ( talk) 11:14, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Nikkimaria, could you please take a look at this? Even though it's using NASA material, enormous chunks have been lifted wholesale, word for word, with only a footnote to indicate anything at all. Even aside from whether there might be 1500 characters of original prose left over, I have major concerns regarding copyvio/plagiarism even beyond the proper quoting and attribution. Thanks.
PS: Lihaas has responded to you in Template:Did you know nominations/2012 SCO summit. BlueMoonset ( talk) 14:34, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Nikkimaria, I've opened a discussion at this thread that you may wish to comment at (and so might all those who watch your talk page). It's likely at some point that I will specifically quote your wording of "Yep - this case does not constitute a copyright violation. However, it is also not well paraphrased" ( 00:58 18 May) as an example of views on paraphrasing, plagiarism, copyvio, that whole messy area. I have no problem with the concerns you initially raised with that article (and as I note in my comment, with higher standards for any "featured" en:wiki venue or award) - just interested in your views on what lines should be drawn, who should draw them, the whole what is our true purpose thing. ;) Thanks & regards! Franamax ( talk) 03:53, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
HI Nikki
Welcome to DC!! And thanks for helping my students with their Wikipedia projects this summer. They are all going to introduce themselves today.
Pfancher ( talk) 12:25, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Jambo! My name is Benjamin Glover and I'm sure it will be a pleasure working with you. Thank you. Benjios ( talk) 13:47, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello my name is Patricia Fedele and a rising senior at Clemson University. Can't wait to work with you on this project!
Laxfangirl (
talk) 20:44, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello! My name is Jacob Whitworth and I am a Sophomore at Clemson University. I cannot wait to get started working with you as well! JacobWhitworth ( talk) 19:29, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi my name is Wilder Allen. I will be a sophomore at Clemson. I am looking forward to working with you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilderallen420 ( talk • contribs) 02:45, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello, my name is Greg Outlaw. I'm a rising sophomore at Clemson University. I'm looking forward to working with you on this project. Goutlaw ( talk) 03:25, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Some days ago you made an image review at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/May Revolution/archive5. I think your concerns have been filled. Can you check it back? Cambalachero ( talk) 00:16, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
With regards to you observation at Wikipedia talk:Citing sources#Bundling citations please see Wikipedia talk:Good article criteria#Footnote ordering -- PBS ( talk) 07:53, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
If I somehow don't run into you today ... I'll be in the hall after the last sessions are over, a little after 4:30, to round people up for a Milhist dinner, hope you can make it. - Dank ( push to talk) 12:30, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Nikki, why did you feature this feedback? Callanecc ( talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 13:31, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
You noted some close paraphrasing and fact issues with this. There have been some edits since, one from the original author and a couple of others, and I've done a bit of work on another paraphrasing segment. Can you please recheck to see whether it's okay to approve, and give it the appropriate icon whether approved or not? Thank you. BlueMoonset ( talk) 15:23, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
I was wondering where the double periods are on Awake (TV series). Other comments have been left on the FAC page. Thanks for you comments! TBran dl ey 03:59, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
On the FAC page for Awake (TV series), I have removed one of the two Science Fiction sources; I kept one as it is an interview, and I can't find any replacement source for that other one, which is in the "Casting" section. Have also removed the Cinema Blend per the FAC, it isn't really a good source, doesn't really seem like it. Per the FAC, I have not removed the TV Fanatic review/source; as in the FAC, "Although I agree with TBrandley that TV Fanatic is a reliable source, based on its website", that's mainly why. I have decied to remove the Zap2it source; I replaced it with a source from TV by the Numbers, which is actually owned by Zap2it. Also, I didn't removed the Voice of TV source; I believe is should be fine, and can't be replacement from what I find anyway. If there are any concerns that haven't been done probably, or are outstanding enough to not promote for FA, please let me know. Thanks for your time! TBran dl ey 04:19, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Its me. Zell Faze ( talk) 04:52, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello Nikkimaria, A few days ago you left some comments on the Dorset article here, to which I replied. Were you intending to undertake a full review of the article or were you merely making some helpful suggestions? There has been a disappointing amount of interest and I am wondering whether it may have been passed over because it appears you have started. I understand if you don't wish to continue with the review and thank you for your remarks you have made but do you have any ideas how we might start the ball rolling again? I have left a message at WT:UKGEO. Best regards-- Ykraps ( talk) 08:41, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Can you do a quick follow up with Template:Did you know nominations/Goéry Delacôte? Thanks. :) -- LauraHale ( talk) 02:52, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
hello, i was editing Teun Voeten wiki page and i have seen on the page history that you add the copypste note on the article. i don't think that anything important has been copypaste, but what do you think i hall do to solve this problem? which part exactly do you think have to be change? Ransfortstraat ( talk) 10:22, 17 July 2012 (UTC)