Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk) 22:51, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Good evening. In a recent deletion discussion, you questioned the applicability of WP:CORP to a mall since that guideline "is for an individual company". The thing to remember is that the mall is an individual company - it's the landlord that the other tenants rent space from. Certain malls may qualify for extra consideration based on the building (for example, if they have exceptional architecture) but other than that, a mall is the same as any other landlord. We deliberately wrote WP:CORP broadly to encompass as many kinds of organizations as possible. Hope that clarifies things a bit. If you'd like to discuss it more, you might want to drop a comment on WP:CORP's Talk page. Thanks. Rossami (talk) 01:10, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi there, I was reading through wp:Ani, and found that a complaint has been made about you, regarding adding NPOV tags to articles, please remember to discuss on the relevent talkpage when you place a tag on an article, it stops confusion like this and means we know what is NPOV in your opinion, if you need anymore information about this, feel free to drop me a line on my talkpage. Best regards, Chafford ( talk) 09:46, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
What correlation is there between x amount of citations and uncited content? If i have 90 references for 15 out of 20 statements but none for the rest, the rest still need citations. There is an error in your logic. I have mentioned it on the talk page. I could give additional information if necessary, however I believe it it pretty obvious what needs to be done. Here's my line. In general the article's tone is very unencyclopedic, it is full of useless trivia, a lot of content is inserted repetitiously. its not a good read at all. basically. its a bad article. lets improve it. if it must exist.
Regarding your comments on
Chris Crocker: Please see Wikipedia's
no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to
blocks for disruption. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. You've now accused me twice of being Crocker - please stop. You have some valid concerns and if you would dial down the accusations we can have some constructive dialog and it could help the article improve.
Banje
boi 03:53, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Please remember to
assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on
Talk:Chris Crocker (Internet celebrity). Thank you.
Bidgee (
talk) 04:00, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
The first is not an accusation, it is a question that you have yet to answer. I personally feel you are very likely the individual in question. Death threats which may or may not be real are not my problem and thinking someone is the individual question has nothing to do with the alleged death threats as I am not threatening anyone. The only person liable is the person making the threats. I doubt Crocker has ever received any serious death threats. I think people just find him annoying and like to say off the wall shit on youtube etc. Myheartinchile ( talk) 22:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Can you please give me a break, I didnt refer to you as stupid I said I think the idea is stupid, That is my opinion and I have every right to express it-- Yankees10 22:59, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
No problem, thanks-- Yankees10 00:56, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Note: warning removed per [1]
respectfully, that's patent bull. the article in question uses youtube as a source dozens of times and the claims in question are represented in a video from the article's subject that he made and posted on youtube. it was the only source i had and its the only source for all the other videos besides "Leave Brittany Alone". I asked on the administrators reporting page and they said the warning was unwarranted. i don't think anything i claimed was controversial with regarads the to behavior and "art" that this individual is reported on in the context of this article or his life. see the video for yourself [3] if a video is not a reliable source for the subject at hand i don't know what is. Myheartinchile ( talk) 02:05, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Please do not engage in edit warring. It's unhelpful, if you feel layout issues should be address you could ask for help or assistance rather than simply reverting something because you don't like how it looks. Per the Wikipedia manual of style infoboxes for articles do indeed go on top on justified to the right side just as it was. Banje boi 23:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
It is inappropriate to prod an article after it has undergone a deletion debate. If you wish to contest the result of the discussion the proper place to do so is at deletion review. Sher eth 18:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Please clarify your question posed on my talk page. Also note that I will respond to questions placed on my talk page there, rather than here. Sher eth 18:09, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Student lounge, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Student lounge (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 22:14, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
I added some references to Stan Neeleman. -- Eastmain ( talk) 02:17, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Regarding your comments on
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soda jerk: Please see Wikipedia's
no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to
blocks for disruption. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
Gwernol 10:42, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, you were probably unaware but renaming articles should generally not be done when they are in AfD or in this case deletion review. Once that process is over we can probably find a new name for the article. Banje boi 22:41, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Excellent template addition, though it needs to be cleaned up a bit. However, navigation templates like that go at the bottom of the articles, below any "see also", "references", "external links", etc. sections. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 03:06, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
"...the article she links to only speaks of the methodology used in the protests and shows that it was a small minor one as there wasn't even a march." - I am a guy. Nwwaew ( Talk Page) ( Contribs) ( E-mail me) 19:21, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Citation Barnstar | |
Good job on adding those references at International Surfing Day! I think those will really turn the tide at its AfD -- Explodicle ( talk) 13:55, 26 June 2008 (UTC) |
KUDOS for your dedication in working to get the International Surfing Day article of AfD. Please send me a PM via the ISD MySpace if possible. Would like to send you an ISD package (skateboard, t-shirt, etc.) for your efforts. Otherwise email me at makingwaves@surfrider.org.
Matty3121 (
talk) 07:15, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
It is highly inappropriate for an editor to initiate a non-admin closure for an article with which he/she has a vested editing interest. It taints the process. Simply suggest a "speedy keep" or let the AfD run its course. Rklawton ( talk) 00:36, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Please also take a moment to review what Wikipedia holds forth as a reliable source. This will help you both with article writing and defence. Rklawton ( talk) 01:08, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, can you clarify why you think Brimley Ball shouldn't be deleted? Please keep in mind that deletion discussions aren't head counts, so you should give an argument. Thanks -- AW ( talk) 20:32, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Please visit the International Surfing Day DYK nomination to address some concerns raised. Thanks. Bebestbe ( talk) 22:59, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
-- BorgQueen ( talk) 14:50, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Myheartinchile for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. ⇔ ∫ÆS dt @ 21:41, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
What's up with this "sock puppetry" thing? what's going on? How will it proceed? Myheartinchile ( talk) 04:27, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
See Template talk:Muni for my full rationale. I will agree to stop reverting if you start discussing on the talk page instead of in edit summaries. — Kurykh 17:18, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
No, no, I'm cool, but I live too far from the beach And my house has no air conditioning. =( — Kurykh 22:24, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Two notes: the signage of the UCSF Mission Bay station says "Gene Friend Way", as do all Muni references, and Williams station has only "Williams" and not "Van Dyke" or any inclusion of that phrase in any Muni reference. — Kurykh 06:59, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
About the T line template: don't add "Visitacion Valley" in, or else it screws up the template for Arleta. It's supposed to have "terminus" right underneath "Sunnydale", but only if the template is in a certain format. — Kurykh 07:12, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
The article title, infobox title, and the first mention in the article body are supposed to have the full name of the station (minus "station"), such as "Folsom and The Embarcadero", etc. The contraction, "Folsom", can be used in the rest of the article. That's why I keep changing them back. — Kurykh 00:24, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
From Wikipedia:Manual of Style (infoboxes)#Design and usage:
The top text line should be bold and contain the full (official) name of the item. This does not need to match the article's Wikipedia title. It should not contain a link. Avoid {{{PAGENAME}}} as pages may be moved for disambiguation.
From Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Article titles, headings and sections:
If possible, an article title is the subject of the first sentence of the article...
From Wikipedia:WikiProject Stations:
The lead paragraph shall include the name of the station as it appears on the system map, and not a short-hand name, but those can and should be mentioned later.
The article title is taken to conform with the other articles (e.g. Montgomery, where on Wikipedia it is denoted as "Montgomery Street") — Kurykh 02:47, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
meh fuck it i don't care that strongly it just looks ugly. so uh hey would you check out the Hercules (Amtrak station) i just created? i'm working on the new stations of the capitol corridor line now. Myheartinchile ( talk) 03:00, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Next time when you edit templates, please remember to check if you're breaking them. For example, on Template:S Castro Shuttle, you inadvertently created a gaping hole on the line of images with the inclusion of the end of the T line (which wasn't necessary anyway). There's detail, but workability of the templates come first. They do have limitations, and can't accommodate all details. — Kurykh 17:03, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Um, I think you gave the wrong AfD nomination for Melora Creager. They're not a cello player. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 02:29, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
While you have done great job expanding the article, the ref provided doesn't mention that being the first direct rail-to-ferry connection on the bay. If you can't find a ref for that, you may want to revise your hook. Thingg ⊕ ⊗ 14:16, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page
Template:STD/STI worked, and it has been
reverted or removed. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to
this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
David Ruben
Talk 23:23, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
-- Gatoclass ( talk) 02:35, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
On most of those maps there is a link to the guidelines,
Wikipedia:Route diagram template, but it doesn't say much, and there's also the pictograms catalog,
Wikipedia:Route diagram template/Catalog of pictograms. Sorry if I say anything you knew already. fiddling around with | lines is usually the best way to get good aesthetics.
Tlantanu (
talk) 03:29, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
I think the integral part of route ferry icon means that everyone leaves the train and goes onto the ferry, or the train itself goes onto the ferry. the
icon is for connecting ferries. One of the things I notice was that the icons didn't match up when there were 2 icons on the same row. try to start the line with {{BS3|| instead of {{BS2| (note the number of lines) this will make the symbols match up. keep up the edits.
Tlantanu (
talk) 16:49, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
{{help}}
I need help with
Birds Landing, California.
MY♥INchile 00:10, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Tagging an article like you did in Salesian High School (Richmond, California) making it unreadbale can also be construed as vandalism. I'm going to revert your chnages again. Take it to the talk page. Philly jawn ( talk) 23:07, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Because you misspelled the title -- it is now at Template:Altamont Commuter Express (you typed "Tamplate"). NawlinWiki ( talk) 00:54, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
--Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 21:14, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
-- Bedford Pray 07:22, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Please don't use the + and - symbols at afd -- there are other places where they are used, but not here. just bold face is clear enough. It's clearer for us admins if everyone contributes in the usual way. DGG ( talk) 01:14, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Re Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spencer Roloson Winery, please don't emphasize your comments over others by inserting graphics. Just use bullet points like everyone else.
Also, please read the AfD proposal carefully and reconsider your position. This article is about a small start-up, having none of the qualities you mention in your comment. ~ Amatulić ( talk) 03:23, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Maxterbation, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
Vianello (
talk) 05:08, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Plase stop posting the picture of the "Maxterbation Guy" on every page you can find...That picture is very low quality and not every article needs a picture. Many articles already have many high quality pictures and many more high quality pictures on that same topic that are in the Wikimedia Commons. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spikydan1 ( talk • contribs) 17:36, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Your AfD nomination has me puzzled. How does this "substantiate" any other article on Wikipedia? This book is part of the notable "alphabet" series from Sue Grafton, who is without a doubt a notable author. There're two valid sources in the article already, and all of her other "alphabet" books have a page, so why did you single this one out? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 00:07, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the lovely message. I am glad you enjoyed my observations -- I don't insult people on Wikipedia (not intentionally, at least) and I try to give praise where it is due. And I have seen and enjoyed your input to the project, so I am glad that I could pay tribute to your offerings. I love the Bay Area -- I was in San Francisco last month and will be back there in October (it is my favourite U.S. city). Please feel free to stay in touch. Ecoleetage ( talk) 03:28, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Ecoleetage (
talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hi, I've rewritten pixologist and encourage you to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pixologist to see if your concerns have been addressed. Please note that a name change to pixel artist is almost assured if the article is kept. Banjeboi 20:56, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello there. You have proposed the article [[{{{1}}}]] for deletion without providing a reason why in the {{ prod}} template. You may be interested to know that you can add your reasoning like this: {{prod|Add reason for deletion here}}. This will make your reasoning show up in the article's deletion notice, and aid other editors who patrol Category:All articles proposed for deletion or WP:PRODLIST. See also: How to propose for deletion. -- Atama chat 22:53, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
{{ help}}
I need help with the references at St. Mary's College High School, i can't seem to find the problem but it's all messed up and not showing the name of one of the athletes, a broken link perhaps? MY♥INchile 17:27, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
It's definitely not a stub. To quote WP:STUB:
Bruener Marsh may still need expanding to give more information, and it may need wikification or other cleanup, but it is considerably longer than anything that could be considered a stub. Grutness... wha? 02:55, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
At the moment it does read a bit like something you'd find oin the company's own website (which makes sense, seeing as that's where the link's to). To make it seem less advertisement like, consider the following things:
If you can find out those things (or even just one or two of them) and add the info to the article, it might make the article a bit longer and less like an ad. Hope that helps, Grutness... wha? 04:20, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Breuner Airfield, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Toddst1 ( talk) 23:14, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Breuner Airfield, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breuner Airfield. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Toddst1 ( talk) 23:22, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
I got your back in that one. Good luck in winning that bad faith AfD. Ecoleetage ( talk) 01:31, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
For my Chilean pal: Isn't life fun? :) Ecoleetage ( talk) 23:24, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Yup. Good job on that. --I'm an Editor of the wiki citation needed 18:03, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Done Great job.
Thingg
⊕
⊗ 01:43, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Very nice. An excellent job. I trust you will appreciate the additional copyedits. It would be nice if someone could expand the article and include, for example: what were the main products (sofas? beds? tables? chairs?); why was the store sold in the 1970s? what caused it to go out of business? Thanks. Truthanado ( talk) 23:38, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Hot carl, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Hot carl is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (
CSD R3).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Hot carl, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
here
CSDWarnBot (
talk) 07:11, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
I have an article that was put up for AfD: [5]. Please take a look and see if you feel it deserves to stay. Thanks! Ecoleetage ( talk) 14:00, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
{{help}}
I would like to recreate the page Hot carl as a redirect to Coprophilia. MY♥INchile 23:04, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
{{help}}
yes there is, its been blocked from re-creation dude. MY♥INchile 23:10, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your expression of interest in Wikipedia Prisons, otherwise known as Wikiproject Correction and Detention Facilities. Seven people have now indicated here that they would like to help out so I am now assuming that this project will actually happen. I suppose we need to take care of a few preliminaries: getting through the proposal stage, and creating a wikiproject page, page tag, and maybe an infobox. Thanks again for your interest. -- Cdogsimmons ( talk) 00:56, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Please stop forum shopping to try to get Breuner Airfield into lists and categories of airports. Proof by assertion is not an acceptable method of finding consensus on Wikipedia. I've observed you posting the same or similar suggestions in Talk:Breuner Airfield, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breuner Airfield, Talk:List of airports in the San Francisco Bay Area, Category talk:Airports in the San Francisco Bay Area, Category talk:Airports in the United States by state , Category talk:Airports in California and Talk:List of private-use airports in California. Yes, you've made it clear that you want to call Breuner Airfield an airport. You're entitled to your opinion. You have received and ignored answers from myself and other editors (some of whom are admins who responded when I asked for help dealing with this situation) saying that calling Breuner Airfield an airport is inappropriate, absurd and nonsense, among other responses. The Third Opinion that you solicited determined that "If it's in the US and the FAA doesn't call it an airport, it's not an airport." I have provided links to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Airports#Creation_Checklists showing that the WikiProject Airports uses the standard of starting with a ICAO, IATA and/or FAA airport code as the first step in creating any airport article - and the consensus there is that even just having an airport code alone is not enough to make an airport notable. Breuner Airfield is a model airplane field and it does not have any airport registration at all. Please accept the feedback of the Wikipedia community that it is inappropriate to pursue calling Breuner Airfield an airport. Please cease and desist from further edits and arguments to add it to lists of airports or enter it into any airport categories. Ikluft ( talk) 00:08, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
As you can see, this project has now taken off. Thanks for your support!-- Cdogsimmons ( talk) 01:28, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
--Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 00:24, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Myheartinchile!
I'm a little worried about the category you created: Category:LGBT topics in the San Francisco Bay Area. There are no other categories like this, so you're "breaking new ground" by creating it. Not necessarily a bad thing, just one that should be done thoughtfully :)
I've started a discussion on the category here and invite you to participate. And to join the WikiProject, if you wish :) Thanks! -- SatyrTN ( talk / contribs) 19:24, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
![]() Hi, Myheartinchile, welcome to WikiProject LGBT Studies! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying, categorizing, and improving articles regarding lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender ( LGBT) and intersex people. LGBT Studies covers people, culture, history, and related subjects concerning sexual identity and gender identity - this covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated! Some points that may be helpful:
If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you. And once again - Welcome! |
-- SatyrTN ( talk / contribs) 00:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
You're right, I should have suggested, but it's all good —Preceding unsigned comment added by Silversword55 ( talk • contribs) 01:35, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
I am pleased to announce that the assessment function is now in operation!-- Cdogsimmons ( talk) 05:05, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
The Miss Julie Memorial LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This newsletter was sent by §hepBot ( Disable) at 21:20, 12 November 2008 (UTC) by the request of Moni3 ( talk)
Ecoleetage (
talk) is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Please changing your category to Category:San Francisco 49ers fans. Thank You. -- WeezleBeezle ( talk) 20:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Visconti Triplets, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz ( talk) 19:58, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
The
Miss Julie Memorial LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter: Special Pride 2009 Booty call edition | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Lord Chaitanya knows everything that happens in all three phases (past, present, and future, of time. He knows that in the future some demoni people will serve Lord Advaita.
Text 123
They will refer to Lord Advaita by the name "Shri Krishna". In this way they will reject the words of the true Vaishnavas.
Text 124
These sinners will thus disobey the devotees who affirm that Advaita is "the greatest Vaishnava".
Text 125
Many persons will consider themselves the followers of Lord Advaita, but they will not have the power to see how in the future they will be punished.
Text 126
Lord Chaitanya, the crest jewel of they who know everything, knew all this. Therefore He did something to try to stop this from happening.
Text 127
By punishing His mother, Lord Chaitanya showed the result that comes from offending Lord Advaita or any other Vaishnava.
Text 128
No one can protect a person who has offended a Vaishnava.
Text 129
Therefore one should avoid persons who offend Vaishnava.
Text 130
One should avoid an offender, even if the offender is otherwise very qualified. A little association with an offender will make one fall down.
Text 131
Who has the power to understand why the Lord gives punishment? By punishing His mother, He taught everyone.
Text 132
Anyone who blasphemes they who use the word `Vaishnava" to address Lord Advaita will be punished. He will perish.
Text 133
Lord Chaitanya is theSupreme Personality of Godhead, the master of all. To be called His follower is very great praise.
Text 134
Without any intention to deceive, Lord Chaitanya openly said that Lord Nityananda is the Supreme Personality of Godhead Himself.
Text 135
By Lord Nityananda's mercy I know Lord Chaitanya. By Lord Nityananda's mercy I know the Vaishnavas.
Text 136
By Lord Nityananda's mercy offenses are destroyed. By Lord Nityananda's mercy one attains devotion to Lord Vishnu.
Text 137
Blasphemy directed to Lord Nityananda's servants never enters my mouth. Day and night I happily sing Lord Chaitanya's glories
Text 138
I carefully serve Lord Nityananda's devotees. Lord Chaitanya is the life and wealth of Lord Nityananda's servants.
Text 139
A person who has only a little good fortune will not become Lord Nityananda's servant, for Lord Nityananda's servant is able to see Lord Chaitanya.
Text 140
Anyone who hears this story of Lord Visvarupa becomes a servant of the limitless Supreme Personality of Godhead. He feels that Lord Nityananda is his very life.
Text 141
Lord Nityananda and Lord Visvarupa do not have different bodies. This Mother Saci knew. Some other great souls also knew.
Text 142
Glory to Lord Nityananda, who takes shelter of Lord Chaitanya! Glory, glory to Lord Nityananda, who is thousand-faced Ananta Sesha!
Text 143
O Lord Nityananda, O king of Gauda-desa, glory to You! Who can attain Lord Chaitanya without first attaining Your mercy?
Text 144
Anyone who loses Lord Nityananda will not be happy in this life.
Text 145
Will I some day see Lord Chaitanya, Lord Nityananda, and their associates all thogether in one place?
Text 146
Lord Chaitanya is my master. With great faith and hope I meditate on Him within my heart.
Text 147
I bow down before Lord Advaita's feet. I pray that he will always be dear to me and that He will always stay in my thoughts.
Text 148
The two moons Shri Krishna Chaitanya and Shri Nityananda are my life and soul. I, Vrindavana dasa, sing the glories of Their feet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.132.82.156 ( talk) 13:58, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
See: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nontheism.
Greetings, I see that you have chosen to conspicuously identify as a "Nontheistic Wikipedian" Me too! Currently there is a proposal to delete the article Nontheism or merge and redirect it to Atheism. Greg Bard ( talk) 22:28, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi! My name is Annie Lin - I'm the Campus Team Coordinator at the Wikimedia Foundation. I'm contacting you because you're listed as a resident of San Francisco, and we're currently looking for a friendly Wikipedian to teach students in a University of San Francisco class how to use/edit Wikipedia. This is a role titled the "Wikipedia Campus Ambassador," and you'll basically be doing in-class presentations about Wikipedia, running Wikipedia labs/workshops, and in general providing face-to-face Wikipedia help for the professor and the students in the class. The time commitment is about 3-5 hours a week (with variations throughout the semester), and for this particular University of San Francisco class, most of the workload will be between March and May.
Please let me know if you're interested!
Thanks. Annie Lin (Campus Team Coordinator, Wikimedia Foundation) ( talk) 19:45, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Category:LGBT topics in the San Francisco Bay Area, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 01:41, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
St. David School (Richmond, California) an article that you have participated in editing has been nominated for deletion a second time, the first time in 2006 resulted in no consensus and, it can be reviewed here. The current discussion on the removal of the article is located here should you wish leave your comment. LuciferWildCat ( talk) 05:14, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
St. David School (Richmond, California) an article that you have participated in editing has been nominated for deletion a second time, the first time in 2006 resulted in no consensus and, it can be reviewed here. The current discussion on the removal of the article is located here should you wish leave your comment. LuciferWildCat ( talk) 05:15, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Hey - Sorry for the late notice, but since you have yourself tagged as living in the Bay Area, I thought you might appreciate notification that we’re having an event Saturday! It’ll be held at Hoyt Hall, an all-women's house of the Berkeley Student Cooperative from 3 to 6 pm tomorrow. The main event page is here. Anyone is welcome to show up, but we’re expecting a significant number of people to come who have literally never edited Wikipedia before. If you’re an experienced Wikipedian who would be able to provide useful help to some of the newbies, your presence would be especially appreciated (and it might be a good idea for you to show up at 2 or 2:30 instead of three. Thanks, Kevin Gorman ( talk) 02:04, 6 April 2013 (UTC) I’m AWB’ing this message to all Wikipedians who have tagged themselves in the bay area. I’m sorry if the message isn’t of interest to you; feel free to delete it. I’ll be unlikely to send future messages in a similar way, but if really don’t want to receive future messages of this sort, please let me know.
Hi Myheartinchile. In case you are not aware, there is an upcoming campaign to improve coverage of LGBT-related topics on Wikipedia, culminating with an international edit-a-thon on June 21. See Wiki Loves Pride 2014 for more information. If you are interested, you might consider creating a page for a major city (or cities!) near you, with a list of LGBT-related articles that need to be created or improved. This would be a tremendous help to Wikipedia and coverage of LGBT culture and history. Thanks for your consideration, and please let me know if you have any questions! -- Another Believer ( Talk) 16:26, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Signature Homes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Signature Homes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 08:36, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!
Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!
If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.
Thanks, and happy editing!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pleasanton (Amtrak station). Since you had some involvement with the Pleasanton (Amtrak station) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mackensen (talk) 22:39, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Breunersoakland.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 09:05, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?
Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.
This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.
Thanks, and happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk) 19:39, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
WikiLGBT is on Twitter! | |
---|---|
|
Thank you for uploading File:Locofeverposter.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:00, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
12st street bart station. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 5#12st street bart station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (
talk) 14:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk) 22:51, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Good evening. In a recent deletion discussion, you questioned the applicability of WP:CORP to a mall since that guideline "is for an individual company". The thing to remember is that the mall is an individual company - it's the landlord that the other tenants rent space from. Certain malls may qualify for extra consideration based on the building (for example, if they have exceptional architecture) but other than that, a mall is the same as any other landlord. We deliberately wrote WP:CORP broadly to encompass as many kinds of organizations as possible. Hope that clarifies things a bit. If you'd like to discuss it more, you might want to drop a comment on WP:CORP's Talk page. Thanks. Rossami (talk) 01:10, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi there, I was reading through wp:Ani, and found that a complaint has been made about you, regarding adding NPOV tags to articles, please remember to discuss on the relevent talkpage when you place a tag on an article, it stops confusion like this and means we know what is NPOV in your opinion, if you need anymore information about this, feel free to drop me a line on my talkpage. Best regards, Chafford ( talk) 09:46, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
What correlation is there between x amount of citations and uncited content? If i have 90 references for 15 out of 20 statements but none for the rest, the rest still need citations. There is an error in your logic. I have mentioned it on the talk page. I could give additional information if necessary, however I believe it it pretty obvious what needs to be done. Here's my line. In general the article's tone is very unencyclopedic, it is full of useless trivia, a lot of content is inserted repetitiously. its not a good read at all. basically. its a bad article. lets improve it. if it must exist.
Regarding your comments on
Chris Crocker: Please see Wikipedia's
no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to
blocks for disruption. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. You've now accused me twice of being Crocker - please stop. You have some valid concerns and if you would dial down the accusations we can have some constructive dialog and it could help the article improve.
Banje
boi 03:53, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Please remember to
assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on
Talk:Chris Crocker (Internet celebrity). Thank you.
Bidgee (
talk) 04:00, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
The first is not an accusation, it is a question that you have yet to answer. I personally feel you are very likely the individual in question. Death threats which may or may not be real are not my problem and thinking someone is the individual question has nothing to do with the alleged death threats as I am not threatening anyone. The only person liable is the person making the threats. I doubt Crocker has ever received any serious death threats. I think people just find him annoying and like to say off the wall shit on youtube etc. Myheartinchile ( talk) 22:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Can you please give me a break, I didnt refer to you as stupid I said I think the idea is stupid, That is my opinion and I have every right to express it-- Yankees10 22:59, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
No problem, thanks-- Yankees10 00:56, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Note: warning removed per [1]
respectfully, that's patent bull. the article in question uses youtube as a source dozens of times and the claims in question are represented in a video from the article's subject that he made and posted on youtube. it was the only source i had and its the only source for all the other videos besides "Leave Brittany Alone". I asked on the administrators reporting page and they said the warning was unwarranted. i don't think anything i claimed was controversial with regarads the to behavior and "art" that this individual is reported on in the context of this article or his life. see the video for yourself [3] if a video is not a reliable source for the subject at hand i don't know what is. Myheartinchile ( talk) 02:05, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Please do not engage in edit warring. It's unhelpful, if you feel layout issues should be address you could ask for help or assistance rather than simply reverting something because you don't like how it looks. Per the Wikipedia manual of style infoboxes for articles do indeed go on top on justified to the right side just as it was. Banje boi 23:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
It is inappropriate to prod an article after it has undergone a deletion debate. If you wish to contest the result of the discussion the proper place to do so is at deletion review. Sher eth 18:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Please clarify your question posed on my talk page. Also note that I will respond to questions placed on my talk page there, rather than here. Sher eth 18:09, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Student lounge, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Student lounge (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 22:14, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
I added some references to Stan Neeleman. -- Eastmain ( talk) 02:17, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Regarding your comments on
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soda jerk: Please see Wikipedia's
no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to
blocks for disruption. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
Gwernol 10:42, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, you were probably unaware but renaming articles should generally not be done when they are in AfD or in this case deletion review. Once that process is over we can probably find a new name for the article. Banje boi 22:41, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Excellent template addition, though it needs to be cleaned up a bit. However, navigation templates like that go at the bottom of the articles, below any "see also", "references", "external links", etc. sections. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 03:06, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
"...the article she links to only speaks of the methodology used in the protests and shows that it was a small minor one as there wasn't even a march." - I am a guy. Nwwaew ( Talk Page) ( Contribs) ( E-mail me) 19:21, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Citation Barnstar | |
Good job on adding those references at International Surfing Day! I think those will really turn the tide at its AfD -- Explodicle ( talk) 13:55, 26 June 2008 (UTC) |
KUDOS for your dedication in working to get the International Surfing Day article of AfD. Please send me a PM via the ISD MySpace if possible. Would like to send you an ISD package (skateboard, t-shirt, etc.) for your efforts. Otherwise email me at makingwaves@surfrider.org.
Matty3121 (
talk) 07:15, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
It is highly inappropriate for an editor to initiate a non-admin closure for an article with which he/she has a vested editing interest. It taints the process. Simply suggest a "speedy keep" or let the AfD run its course. Rklawton ( talk) 00:36, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Please also take a moment to review what Wikipedia holds forth as a reliable source. This will help you both with article writing and defence. Rklawton ( talk) 01:08, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, can you clarify why you think Brimley Ball shouldn't be deleted? Please keep in mind that deletion discussions aren't head counts, so you should give an argument. Thanks -- AW ( talk) 20:32, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Please visit the International Surfing Day DYK nomination to address some concerns raised. Thanks. Bebestbe ( talk) 22:59, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
-- BorgQueen ( talk) 14:50, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Myheartinchile for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. ⇔ ∫ÆS dt @ 21:41, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
What's up with this "sock puppetry" thing? what's going on? How will it proceed? Myheartinchile ( talk) 04:27, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
See Template talk:Muni for my full rationale. I will agree to stop reverting if you start discussing on the talk page instead of in edit summaries. — Kurykh 17:18, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
No, no, I'm cool, but I live too far from the beach And my house has no air conditioning. =( — Kurykh 22:24, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Two notes: the signage of the UCSF Mission Bay station says "Gene Friend Way", as do all Muni references, and Williams station has only "Williams" and not "Van Dyke" or any inclusion of that phrase in any Muni reference. — Kurykh 06:59, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
About the T line template: don't add "Visitacion Valley" in, or else it screws up the template for Arleta. It's supposed to have "terminus" right underneath "Sunnydale", but only if the template is in a certain format. — Kurykh 07:12, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
The article title, infobox title, and the first mention in the article body are supposed to have the full name of the station (minus "station"), such as "Folsom and The Embarcadero", etc. The contraction, "Folsom", can be used in the rest of the article. That's why I keep changing them back. — Kurykh 00:24, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
From Wikipedia:Manual of Style (infoboxes)#Design and usage:
The top text line should be bold and contain the full (official) name of the item. This does not need to match the article's Wikipedia title. It should not contain a link. Avoid {{{PAGENAME}}} as pages may be moved for disambiguation.
From Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Article titles, headings and sections:
If possible, an article title is the subject of the first sentence of the article...
From Wikipedia:WikiProject Stations:
The lead paragraph shall include the name of the station as it appears on the system map, and not a short-hand name, but those can and should be mentioned later.
The article title is taken to conform with the other articles (e.g. Montgomery, where on Wikipedia it is denoted as "Montgomery Street") — Kurykh 02:47, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
meh fuck it i don't care that strongly it just looks ugly. so uh hey would you check out the Hercules (Amtrak station) i just created? i'm working on the new stations of the capitol corridor line now. Myheartinchile ( talk) 03:00, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Next time when you edit templates, please remember to check if you're breaking them. For example, on Template:S Castro Shuttle, you inadvertently created a gaping hole on the line of images with the inclusion of the end of the T line (which wasn't necessary anyway). There's detail, but workability of the templates come first. They do have limitations, and can't accommodate all details. — Kurykh 17:03, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Um, I think you gave the wrong AfD nomination for Melora Creager. They're not a cello player. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 02:29, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
While you have done great job expanding the article, the ref provided doesn't mention that being the first direct rail-to-ferry connection on the bay. If you can't find a ref for that, you may want to revise your hook. Thingg ⊕ ⊗ 14:16, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page
Template:STD/STI worked, and it has been
reverted or removed. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to
this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
David Ruben
Talk 23:23, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
-- Gatoclass ( talk) 02:35, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
On most of those maps there is a link to the guidelines,
Wikipedia:Route diagram template, but it doesn't say much, and there's also the pictograms catalog,
Wikipedia:Route diagram template/Catalog of pictograms. Sorry if I say anything you knew already. fiddling around with | lines is usually the best way to get good aesthetics.
Tlantanu (
talk) 03:29, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
I think the integral part of route ferry icon means that everyone leaves the train and goes onto the ferry, or the train itself goes onto the ferry. the
icon is for connecting ferries. One of the things I notice was that the icons didn't match up when there were 2 icons on the same row. try to start the line with {{BS3|| instead of {{BS2| (note the number of lines) this will make the symbols match up. keep up the edits.
Tlantanu (
talk) 16:49, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
{{help}}
I need help with
Birds Landing, California.
MY♥INchile 00:10, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Tagging an article like you did in Salesian High School (Richmond, California) making it unreadbale can also be construed as vandalism. I'm going to revert your chnages again. Take it to the talk page. Philly jawn ( talk) 23:07, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Because you misspelled the title -- it is now at Template:Altamont Commuter Express (you typed "Tamplate"). NawlinWiki ( talk) 00:54, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
--Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 21:14, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
-- Bedford Pray 07:22, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Please don't use the + and - symbols at afd -- there are other places where they are used, but not here. just bold face is clear enough. It's clearer for us admins if everyone contributes in the usual way. DGG ( talk) 01:14, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Re Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spencer Roloson Winery, please don't emphasize your comments over others by inserting graphics. Just use bullet points like everyone else.
Also, please read the AfD proposal carefully and reconsider your position. This article is about a small start-up, having none of the qualities you mention in your comment. ~ Amatulić ( talk) 03:23, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Maxterbation, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
Vianello (
talk) 05:08, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Plase stop posting the picture of the "Maxterbation Guy" on every page you can find...That picture is very low quality and not every article needs a picture. Many articles already have many high quality pictures and many more high quality pictures on that same topic that are in the Wikimedia Commons. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spikydan1 ( talk • contribs) 17:36, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Your AfD nomination has me puzzled. How does this "substantiate" any other article on Wikipedia? This book is part of the notable "alphabet" series from Sue Grafton, who is without a doubt a notable author. There're two valid sources in the article already, and all of her other "alphabet" books have a page, so why did you single this one out? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 00:07, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the lovely message. I am glad you enjoyed my observations -- I don't insult people on Wikipedia (not intentionally, at least) and I try to give praise where it is due. And I have seen and enjoyed your input to the project, so I am glad that I could pay tribute to your offerings. I love the Bay Area -- I was in San Francisco last month and will be back there in October (it is my favourite U.S. city). Please feel free to stay in touch. Ecoleetage ( talk) 03:28, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Ecoleetage (
talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hi, I've rewritten pixologist and encourage you to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pixologist to see if your concerns have been addressed. Please note that a name change to pixel artist is almost assured if the article is kept. Banjeboi 20:56, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello there. You have proposed the article [[{{{1}}}]] for deletion without providing a reason why in the {{ prod}} template. You may be interested to know that you can add your reasoning like this: {{prod|Add reason for deletion here}}. This will make your reasoning show up in the article's deletion notice, and aid other editors who patrol Category:All articles proposed for deletion or WP:PRODLIST. See also: How to propose for deletion. -- Atama chat 22:53, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
{{ help}}
I need help with the references at St. Mary's College High School, i can't seem to find the problem but it's all messed up and not showing the name of one of the athletes, a broken link perhaps? MY♥INchile 17:27, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
It's definitely not a stub. To quote WP:STUB:
Bruener Marsh may still need expanding to give more information, and it may need wikification or other cleanup, but it is considerably longer than anything that could be considered a stub. Grutness... wha? 02:55, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
At the moment it does read a bit like something you'd find oin the company's own website (which makes sense, seeing as that's where the link's to). To make it seem less advertisement like, consider the following things:
If you can find out those things (or even just one or two of them) and add the info to the article, it might make the article a bit longer and less like an ad. Hope that helps, Grutness... wha? 04:20, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Breuner Airfield, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Toddst1 ( talk) 23:14, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Breuner Airfield, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breuner Airfield. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Toddst1 ( talk) 23:22, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
I got your back in that one. Good luck in winning that bad faith AfD. Ecoleetage ( talk) 01:31, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
For my Chilean pal: Isn't life fun? :) Ecoleetage ( talk) 23:24, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Yup. Good job on that. --I'm an Editor of the wiki citation needed 18:03, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Done Great job.
Thingg
⊕
⊗ 01:43, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Very nice. An excellent job. I trust you will appreciate the additional copyedits. It would be nice if someone could expand the article and include, for example: what were the main products (sofas? beds? tables? chairs?); why was the store sold in the 1970s? what caused it to go out of business? Thanks. Truthanado ( talk) 23:38, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Hot carl, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Hot carl is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (
CSD R3).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Hot carl, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
here
CSDWarnBot (
talk) 07:11, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
I have an article that was put up for AfD: [5]. Please take a look and see if you feel it deserves to stay. Thanks! Ecoleetage ( talk) 14:00, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
{{help}}
I would like to recreate the page Hot carl as a redirect to Coprophilia. MY♥INchile 23:04, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
{{help}}
yes there is, its been blocked from re-creation dude. MY♥INchile 23:10, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your expression of interest in Wikipedia Prisons, otherwise known as Wikiproject Correction and Detention Facilities. Seven people have now indicated here that they would like to help out so I am now assuming that this project will actually happen. I suppose we need to take care of a few preliminaries: getting through the proposal stage, and creating a wikiproject page, page tag, and maybe an infobox. Thanks again for your interest. -- Cdogsimmons ( talk) 00:56, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Please stop forum shopping to try to get Breuner Airfield into lists and categories of airports. Proof by assertion is not an acceptable method of finding consensus on Wikipedia. I've observed you posting the same or similar suggestions in Talk:Breuner Airfield, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breuner Airfield, Talk:List of airports in the San Francisco Bay Area, Category talk:Airports in the San Francisco Bay Area, Category talk:Airports in the United States by state , Category talk:Airports in California and Talk:List of private-use airports in California. Yes, you've made it clear that you want to call Breuner Airfield an airport. You're entitled to your opinion. You have received and ignored answers from myself and other editors (some of whom are admins who responded when I asked for help dealing with this situation) saying that calling Breuner Airfield an airport is inappropriate, absurd and nonsense, among other responses. The Third Opinion that you solicited determined that "If it's in the US and the FAA doesn't call it an airport, it's not an airport." I have provided links to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Airports#Creation_Checklists showing that the WikiProject Airports uses the standard of starting with a ICAO, IATA and/or FAA airport code as the first step in creating any airport article - and the consensus there is that even just having an airport code alone is not enough to make an airport notable. Breuner Airfield is a model airplane field and it does not have any airport registration at all. Please accept the feedback of the Wikipedia community that it is inappropriate to pursue calling Breuner Airfield an airport. Please cease and desist from further edits and arguments to add it to lists of airports or enter it into any airport categories. Ikluft ( talk) 00:08, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
As you can see, this project has now taken off. Thanks for your support!-- Cdogsimmons ( talk) 01:28, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
--Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 00:24, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Myheartinchile!
I'm a little worried about the category you created: Category:LGBT topics in the San Francisco Bay Area. There are no other categories like this, so you're "breaking new ground" by creating it. Not necessarily a bad thing, just one that should be done thoughtfully :)
I've started a discussion on the category here and invite you to participate. And to join the WikiProject, if you wish :) Thanks! -- SatyrTN ( talk / contribs) 19:24, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
![]() Hi, Myheartinchile, welcome to WikiProject LGBT Studies! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying, categorizing, and improving articles regarding lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender ( LGBT) and intersex people. LGBT Studies covers people, culture, history, and related subjects concerning sexual identity and gender identity - this covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated! Some points that may be helpful:
If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you. And once again - Welcome! |
-- SatyrTN ( talk / contribs) 00:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
You're right, I should have suggested, but it's all good —Preceding unsigned comment added by Silversword55 ( talk • contribs) 01:35, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
I am pleased to announce that the assessment function is now in operation!-- Cdogsimmons ( talk) 05:05, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
The Miss Julie Memorial LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This newsletter was sent by §hepBot ( Disable) at 21:20, 12 November 2008 (UTC) by the request of Moni3 ( talk)
Ecoleetage (
talk) is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Please changing your category to Category:San Francisco 49ers fans. Thank You. -- WeezleBeezle ( talk) 20:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Visconti Triplets, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz ( talk) 19:58, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
The
Miss Julie Memorial LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter: Special Pride 2009 Booty call edition | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Lord Chaitanya knows everything that happens in all three phases (past, present, and future, of time. He knows that in the future some demoni people will serve Lord Advaita.
Text 123
They will refer to Lord Advaita by the name "Shri Krishna". In this way they will reject the words of the true Vaishnavas.
Text 124
These sinners will thus disobey the devotees who affirm that Advaita is "the greatest Vaishnava".
Text 125
Many persons will consider themselves the followers of Lord Advaita, but they will not have the power to see how in the future they will be punished.
Text 126
Lord Chaitanya, the crest jewel of they who know everything, knew all this. Therefore He did something to try to stop this from happening.
Text 127
By punishing His mother, Lord Chaitanya showed the result that comes from offending Lord Advaita or any other Vaishnava.
Text 128
No one can protect a person who has offended a Vaishnava.
Text 129
Therefore one should avoid persons who offend Vaishnava.
Text 130
One should avoid an offender, even if the offender is otherwise very qualified. A little association with an offender will make one fall down.
Text 131
Who has the power to understand why the Lord gives punishment? By punishing His mother, He taught everyone.
Text 132
Anyone who blasphemes they who use the word `Vaishnava" to address Lord Advaita will be punished. He will perish.
Text 133
Lord Chaitanya is theSupreme Personality of Godhead, the master of all. To be called His follower is very great praise.
Text 134
Without any intention to deceive, Lord Chaitanya openly said that Lord Nityananda is the Supreme Personality of Godhead Himself.
Text 135
By Lord Nityananda's mercy I know Lord Chaitanya. By Lord Nityananda's mercy I know the Vaishnavas.
Text 136
By Lord Nityananda's mercy offenses are destroyed. By Lord Nityananda's mercy one attains devotion to Lord Vishnu.
Text 137
Blasphemy directed to Lord Nityananda's servants never enters my mouth. Day and night I happily sing Lord Chaitanya's glories
Text 138
I carefully serve Lord Nityananda's devotees. Lord Chaitanya is the life and wealth of Lord Nityananda's servants.
Text 139
A person who has only a little good fortune will not become Lord Nityananda's servant, for Lord Nityananda's servant is able to see Lord Chaitanya.
Text 140
Anyone who hears this story of Lord Visvarupa becomes a servant of the limitless Supreme Personality of Godhead. He feels that Lord Nityananda is his very life.
Text 141
Lord Nityananda and Lord Visvarupa do not have different bodies. This Mother Saci knew. Some other great souls also knew.
Text 142
Glory to Lord Nityananda, who takes shelter of Lord Chaitanya! Glory, glory to Lord Nityananda, who is thousand-faced Ananta Sesha!
Text 143
O Lord Nityananda, O king of Gauda-desa, glory to You! Who can attain Lord Chaitanya without first attaining Your mercy?
Text 144
Anyone who loses Lord Nityananda will not be happy in this life.
Text 145
Will I some day see Lord Chaitanya, Lord Nityananda, and their associates all thogether in one place?
Text 146
Lord Chaitanya is my master. With great faith and hope I meditate on Him within my heart.
Text 147
I bow down before Lord Advaita's feet. I pray that he will always be dear to me and that He will always stay in my thoughts.
Text 148
The two moons Shri Krishna Chaitanya and Shri Nityananda are my life and soul. I, Vrindavana dasa, sing the glories of Their feet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.132.82.156 ( talk) 13:58, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
See: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nontheism.
Greetings, I see that you have chosen to conspicuously identify as a "Nontheistic Wikipedian" Me too! Currently there is a proposal to delete the article Nontheism or merge and redirect it to Atheism. Greg Bard ( talk) 22:28, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi! My name is Annie Lin - I'm the Campus Team Coordinator at the Wikimedia Foundation. I'm contacting you because you're listed as a resident of San Francisco, and we're currently looking for a friendly Wikipedian to teach students in a University of San Francisco class how to use/edit Wikipedia. This is a role titled the "Wikipedia Campus Ambassador," and you'll basically be doing in-class presentations about Wikipedia, running Wikipedia labs/workshops, and in general providing face-to-face Wikipedia help for the professor and the students in the class. The time commitment is about 3-5 hours a week (with variations throughout the semester), and for this particular University of San Francisco class, most of the workload will be between March and May.
Please let me know if you're interested!
Thanks. Annie Lin (Campus Team Coordinator, Wikimedia Foundation) ( talk) 19:45, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Category:LGBT topics in the San Francisco Bay Area, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 01:41, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
St. David School (Richmond, California) an article that you have participated in editing has been nominated for deletion a second time, the first time in 2006 resulted in no consensus and, it can be reviewed here. The current discussion on the removal of the article is located here should you wish leave your comment. LuciferWildCat ( talk) 05:14, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
St. David School (Richmond, California) an article that you have participated in editing has been nominated for deletion a second time, the first time in 2006 resulted in no consensus and, it can be reviewed here. The current discussion on the removal of the article is located here should you wish leave your comment. LuciferWildCat ( talk) 05:15, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Hey - Sorry for the late notice, but since you have yourself tagged as living in the Bay Area, I thought you might appreciate notification that we’re having an event Saturday! It’ll be held at Hoyt Hall, an all-women's house of the Berkeley Student Cooperative from 3 to 6 pm tomorrow. The main event page is here. Anyone is welcome to show up, but we’re expecting a significant number of people to come who have literally never edited Wikipedia before. If you’re an experienced Wikipedian who would be able to provide useful help to some of the newbies, your presence would be especially appreciated (and it might be a good idea for you to show up at 2 or 2:30 instead of three. Thanks, Kevin Gorman ( talk) 02:04, 6 April 2013 (UTC) I’m AWB’ing this message to all Wikipedians who have tagged themselves in the bay area. I’m sorry if the message isn’t of interest to you; feel free to delete it. I’ll be unlikely to send future messages in a similar way, but if really don’t want to receive future messages of this sort, please let me know.
Hi Myheartinchile. In case you are not aware, there is an upcoming campaign to improve coverage of LGBT-related topics on Wikipedia, culminating with an international edit-a-thon on June 21. See Wiki Loves Pride 2014 for more information. If you are interested, you might consider creating a page for a major city (or cities!) near you, with a list of LGBT-related articles that need to be created or improved. This would be a tremendous help to Wikipedia and coverage of LGBT culture and history. Thanks for your consideration, and please let me know if you have any questions! -- Another Believer ( Talk) 16:26, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Signature Homes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Signature Homes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 08:36, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!
Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!
If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.
Thanks, and happy editing!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pleasanton (Amtrak station). Since you had some involvement with the Pleasanton (Amtrak station) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mackensen (talk) 22:39, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Breunersoakland.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 09:05, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?
Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.
This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.
Thanks, and happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk) 19:39, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
WikiLGBT is on Twitter! | |
---|---|
|
Thank you for uploading File:Locofeverposter.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:00, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
12st street bart station. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 5#12st street bart station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (
talk) 14:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)