Archive for March 2006 InformationInvitationI'd like your thoughts on a brainstorm I've tried to articulate here: User:Leifern/Adminwatch idea. And feel free to spread the word. -- Leifern 16:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC) ThanksThanks for reverting vandlism to my user page. -- JiFish( Talk/ Contrib) 00:10, 4 March 2006 (UTC) Polish noticeboardYou may be interested in visiting our Wikipedia:Polish Wikipedians' notice board.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 07:06, 4 March 2006 (UTC) What if someone crossed out the Polish flag?Would you find that respectful? ROGNNTUDJUU! 17:22, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Good jobI just wanted to commend you for the way in which you've been handling this situation involving ROGNNTUDJUU!. The two images he has been posting everywhere, the crossed-out US and UK flags, have been nominated for deletion at WP:IFD because of their violation of policy (they were only uploaded to prove a point, as he even admitted to on the images' talk pages). Hopefully ROGNNTUDJUU! will learn what is appropriate in this community and things will cool down. But, until then, keep up the good work, and if you want any support in anything, I'm around. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Metros232 ( talk • contribs) QuestionDo you write the revert messages such as "Reverted edits by 195.195.127.253 to last version by Quiddity" every time manually, or do you use some script or template? Thanks, -- -Marcus- 12:16, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
User PGPThanks for being the first user I noticed to try out my {{ User PGP}} box. Kit O'Connell ( Todfox: user / talk / contribs) 21:06, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
RuneScapeSorry for accidentally reverting your revert of vandalism on RuneScape...we must have hit revert at the same time and you got to it first. Schzmo 11:57, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Hello Misza13I saw your work it's very nice.I was only experimenting and i wont do it again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.131.190.122 ( talk • contribs) Tawkerbot2Hmm, I wonder if this was another freak networking error, there filter that it was flagged under a criteria what it wouldn't catch. I'll have a look into it, that one is the one in a thousand bug we've been having. Sorry about that -- Tawker 17:56, 11 March 2006 (UTC) ThanksThanks for providing the link for MarkSweep to ban me. You're not getting anything in my Wikiwill! ;) -- D- Day My fan mail. Click to view my evil userboxes 18:47, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
rv of vandalismHi Misza, Just a quick note to say thank you for reverting the vandalism of my userpage! As funny as that was, I'd probably prefer it not to be there... on balance! Thanks again, DJR ( Talk) 19:10, 11 March 2006 (UTC) Alien vs. PredatorWhat's the problem? That article needs MAJOR cleanup work and I'm taking it upon myself to do it. Why would you revert my edits? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.36.17.218 ( talk • contribs) 22:01, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Maybe this is a matter of me inproperly stating my intentions. I'm all to happy to continue allowing anyone and everyone to make edits to the page, including my work. HOWEVER, much of what's on that page (as is noted on the edit page) is simply speculation inserted based on people's memories of the film. In addition, I don't feel that such an in-depth breakdown of the entire film story - including spoilers - is neccesary for a descriptive page on the film. I honestly feel that my edits make the page cleaner, easier to understand and more direct. I simply don't have enough time to spend several hours fixing everything in one big sitting, if you guys woukld like to add to or modify my edits, please do, but don't simply revert my work. I'm trying to benefit the page, not vandalize it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.36.17.218 ( talk • contribs) 21:26, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Fair enough, but: 1. I did put something about my edits on the talk page, and I did add edit captions to a couple of my reversions saying that I was attempting to HELP the article 2. I was unaware if the three revert rule BUT 3. It only came to that because you guys simply panned my edits as vandalism without so much as looking at what I had written. I'm making an effort to ensure that everything of importance that was on tha page before reamins there, I'm simply removing surpurflous information and rewording what's left. As you would have noted if you'd read my changes before you reverted them, the plot synopsis is still there, as are the facts and trivia, etc... The only thing I've really removed is the speculatory and largly inaccurate overly large breakdown of the film's events - it just seems like I removed much more beacuse that section occupied a considerable amount of space. If the consensus is that the play by play breakdown should remain, then let's re-insert it - but let's do it in clear language and without the inaccuracies. If we're going to continue this discussion, please forward any comments to my talk page. -- Flash-Gordon 10:05, 12 March 2006 (UTC) Regarding your edit here. Why are you reverting your own reverts? You also might want to check this guy User:200.118.111.122 who jumped into two unrelated edit wars in a very timely manner. Shoot, you're not an admin!? Aucaman Talk 14:51, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
ThanksThanks Misza for wishing me happy birthday. Szvest 15:10, 12 March 2006 (UTC) Wiki me up™ RedirectSorry about that, will do. McPhail 15:26, 12 March 2006 (UTC) Comment from User:200.118.111.122why are you chnaging my edits? i'm editing based on sources, please read before changing —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.118.111.122 ( talk • contribs)
Vandalism?????What are you talking about? I havent vandalised anything. I never edit, and I dont even know how to vandalise. My friend is the only other person that knows my password, he might have done that. I wouldnt ruin people's things, that is mean and it takes away peoples info. If you could beilieve me please reply.
Thank youThank you for working on Portal:Culture of Indians. I see this portal will be successful. - User:Code Napoleon Revert on Cold WarJust FYI, I've reverted your revert on Cold War. The anon User:209.66.200.45 fixed the vandalism; your revert restored the Pig Latin version (done by User:ChaoticAzure). - jredmond 19:21, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
WikiDefcon 1Hello! FYI, the WikiDefcon 1 is reserved for really extreme cases of vandalism. If you feel that there is some increase of activity (I did a quick check with CDVF and couldn't spot it) it rather qualifies as 4. 3 and 2 are used when Wikipedia is assaulted by massive attack by automated/bot attack (such as SQUIDWARD). Finally, I don't know if level 1 (formerly known as "Overwhelming level of vandalism. Database lock recommended.") was ever legitimately called. Thus, I have reverted it back to 5. Please be careful in judging the situation in future not to cause unnecessary panic. Thank you, Misza 13 T C 13:22, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
Warm welcomeI'd just like to thank you for the welcome you gave me, so, thanks :) S-m-r-t 16:19, 16 March 2006 (UTC) User: Ad it alI recently read your comment on Naconkantari's talk page about putting my cousins pleas to him in BJAODN, and I must say I am insulted. I believe, despite his actions, he should be treated fairly, and I believe an informal apology is in order. Trosk 00:02, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Mini Thanks!Congratulations on your victory in the war against vandalism on Mini today. Many thanks! SteveBaker 14:32, 17 March 2006 (UTC) User trollingHey Misza13, a couple of weeks back, you had some dealings with ROGNNTUDJUU!. At the time you warned him that his actions were borderline trolling and spamming. Well, the user is back and doing much of the same things. He deleted the comment you left on his user page: [1]. The user continues to delete comments off the talk pages at his own whim and reply to them on other talk pages if he feels like it. What kind of action do you advise from here?-- Metros232 23:58, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my talk page, and for reporting this one to WP:AIV. Much appreciate. Gwernol 15:57, 18 March 2006 (UTC) Bouncing Souls moveThanks for the help with the Bouncing Souls move. bmearns, KSC( talk) 22:18, 18 March 2006 (UTC) ThanksThanks for reverting vandal on my user page [2]. -- Ugur Basak 23:15, 18 March 2006 (UTC) CSDYour personal monobook is appearing in CAT:CSD. Your edit summaries do not appear that you really want this deleted. If you do please make an edit to it, specificy PLEASE DELETE, or leave me a talk message. If you do not want this deleted, please examine it for why it may be getting categorzied for deletion. Thanks, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xaosflux ( talk • contribs) 04:34, March 19, 2006
Stop vandalising my pageI explain on my user talk page how I deal with posts. If you do not like it, we have to agree to differ. Reverts on other users' talk pages are vandalism and I expect you to stop it. ROGNNTUDJUU! 16:09, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Thank you!Thank you for updating my vandalism counter. :) - Trysha ( talk) 09:56, 20 March 2006 (UTC) Renovate PageHi, I saw that you are doing userpage renovations and I was wondering if I could get mine renovated. Something like yours would be good. Thanks L e idi ot 10:21, 20 March 2006 (UTC) Hello Misza Have you done any research or do you know anything about the organization called the Club of Rome? Quite obviously the initial entry was written by The Club of Rome itself which of course would fail to mention that in fact they are an organization dedicated to reducing the population of "undesirables" such as yourself. They are one of the leading proponents of these draconian New World Order methodologies which include cold malthusian analysis and a eugenics approach to "culling" the population. Wikipedia could be a very liberating and informative source of real information about the world around us but first it has to have completely accurate information. Have you researched before you deleted my accurate depiction of the club of Rome? Christopher Broder ( 69.113.25.112 ( talk · contribs))
Birthday^_^ Thanks. Happy early birthday to you, too! Big 18 for me tomorrow, though I still have a lot of work to do 'till I consider myself an adult :) — Deckill e r 22:36, 24 March 2006 (UTC) It is proper isn't it?I do believe that my edits to Talk:Quantile are proper. Could you please comment on some sources I have compiled. 68.78.35.117 03:25, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Re:VandalismReally appreciate the assisstance there. What is it with some people ? Find on my userpage a list of Wikipedia protocol that will be of use to you. Go ahead and make a copy for your use. Again, appreciate the assisstance. Martial Law 07:42, 25 March 2006 (UTC) :) Happy birthday to you also![]() Happy birthday! Our birthdays are one day apart :) — Deckill e r 23:28, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
![]()
![]() Happy Birthday Misza13! thanks for doing my user page by the way L e idi ot 02:47, 26 March 2006 (UTC) Happy Birthday, see you on IRC, and have a good one! -- Ali K 05:50, 26 March 2006 (UTC) Happy Birthday, ![]() I saw on Esperanza it is your birthday? Congratulations!! Gryffindor Thanks......for the birthday wishes :) — FireFox • T [14:11, 26 March 2006] EsperanzaThanks for the welcome. I'll do my best :-) — Wh o uk ( talk) 21:33, 27 March 2006 (UTC) Happy birthdayHappy Birth day - I missed the party as I was detained at another wikipedian's birth day party. -- Bhadani 16:26, 28 March 2006 (UTC) Birthday greetings![]() -- h y dkat 05:14, 29 March 2006 (UTC) Re: Edit anniversary
Re: Block of User:GrueHmmm... Isn't 48 hours a bit too long for a "cool down" penalty? Misza 13 T C 19:59, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
|
Archive for March 2006 InformationInvitationI'd like your thoughts on a brainstorm I've tried to articulate here: User:Leifern/Adminwatch idea. And feel free to spread the word. -- Leifern 16:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC) ThanksThanks for reverting vandlism to my user page. -- JiFish( Talk/ Contrib) 00:10, 4 March 2006 (UTC) Polish noticeboardYou may be interested in visiting our Wikipedia:Polish Wikipedians' notice board.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 07:06, 4 March 2006 (UTC) What if someone crossed out the Polish flag?Would you find that respectful? ROGNNTUDJUU! 17:22, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Good jobI just wanted to commend you for the way in which you've been handling this situation involving ROGNNTUDJUU!. The two images he has been posting everywhere, the crossed-out US and UK flags, have been nominated for deletion at WP:IFD because of their violation of policy (they were only uploaded to prove a point, as he even admitted to on the images' talk pages). Hopefully ROGNNTUDJUU! will learn what is appropriate in this community and things will cool down. But, until then, keep up the good work, and if you want any support in anything, I'm around. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Metros232 ( talk • contribs) QuestionDo you write the revert messages such as "Reverted edits by 195.195.127.253 to last version by Quiddity" every time manually, or do you use some script or template? Thanks, -- -Marcus- 12:16, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
User PGPThanks for being the first user I noticed to try out my {{ User PGP}} box. Kit O'Connell ( Todfox: user / talk / contribs) 21:06, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
RuneScapeSorry for accidentally reverting your revert of vandalism on RuneScape...we must have hit revert at the same time and you got to it first. Schzmo 11:57, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Hello Misza13I saw your work it's very nice.I was only experimenting and i wont do it again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.131.190.122 ( talk • contribs) Tawkerbot2Hmm, I wonder if this was another freak networking error, there filter that it was flagged under a criteria what it wouldn't catch. I'll have a look into it, that one is the one in a thousand bug we've been having. Sorry about that -- Tawker 17:56, 11 March 2006 (UTC) ThanksThanks for providing the link for MarkSweep to ban me. You're not getting anything in my Wikiwill! ;) -- D- Day My fan mail. Click to view my evil userboxes 18:47, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
rv of vandalismHi Misza, Just a quick note to say thank you for reverting the vandalism of my userpage! As funny as that was, I'd probably prefer it not to be there... on balance! Thanks again, DJR ( Talk) 19:10, 11 March 2006 (UTC) Alien vs. PredatorWhat's the problem? That article needs MAJOR cleanup work and I'm taking it upon myself to do it. Why would you revert my edits? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.36.17.218 ( talk • contribs) 22:01, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Maybe this is a matter of me inproperly stating my intentions. I'm all to happy to continue allowing anyone and everyone to make edits to the page, including my work. HOWEVER, much of what's on that page (as is noted on the edit page) is simply speculation inserted based on people's memories of the film. In addition, I don't feel that such an in-depth breakdown of the entire film story - including spoilers - is neccesary for a descriptive page on the film. I honestly feel that my edits make the page cleaner, easier to understand and more direct. I simply don't have enough time to spend several hours fixing everything in one big sitting, if you guys woukld like to add to or modify my edits, please do, but don't simply revert my work. I'm trying to benefit the page, not vandalize it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.36.17.218 ( talk • contribs) 21:26, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Fair enough, but: 1. I did put something about my edits on the talk page, and I did add edit captions to a couple of my reversions saying that I was attempting to HELP the article 2. I was unaware if the three revert rule BUT 3. It only came to that because you guys simply panned my edits as vandalism without so much as looking at what I had written. I'm making an effort to ensure that everything of importance that was on tha page before reamins there, I'm simply removing surpurflous information and rewording what's left. As you would have noted if you'd read my changes before you reverted them, the plot synopsis is still there, as are the facts and trivia, etc... The only thing I've really removed is the speculatory and largly inaccurate overly large breakdown of the film's events - it just seems like I removed much more beacuse that section occupied a considerable amount of space. If the consensus is that the play by play breakdown should remain, then let's re-insert it - but let's do it in clear language and without the inaccuracies. If we're going to continue this discussion, please forward any comments to my talk page. -- Flash-Gordon 10:05, 12 March 2006 (UTC) Regarding your edit here. Why are you reverting your own reverts? You also might want to check this guy User:200.118.111.122 who jumped into two unrelated edit wars in a very timely manner. Shoot, you're not an admin!? Aucaman Talk 14:51, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
ThanksThanks Misza for wishing me happy birthday. Szvest 15:10, 12 March 2006 (UTC) Wiki me up™ RedirectSorry about that, will do. McPhail 15:26, 12 March 2006 (UTC) Comment from User:200.118.111.122why are you chnaging my edits? i'm editing based on sources, please read before changing —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.118.111.122 ( talk • contribs)
Vandalism?????What are you talking about? I havent vandalised anything. I never edit, and I dont even know how to vandalise. My friend is the only other person that knows my password, he might have done that. I wouldnt ruin people's things, that is mean and it takes away peoples info. If you could beilieve me please reply.
Thank youThank you for working on Portal:Culture of Indians. I see this portal will be successful. - User:Code Napoleon Revert on Cold WarJust FYI, I've reverted your revert on Cold War. The anon User:209.66.200.45 fixed the vandalism; your revert restored the Pig Latin version (done by User:ChaoticAzure). - jredmond 19:21, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
WikiDefcon 1Hello! FYI, the WikiDefcon 1 is reserved for really extreme cases of vandalism. If you feel that there is some increase of activity (I did a quick check with CDVF and couldn't spot it) it rather qualifies as 4. 3 and 2 are used when Wikipedia is assaulted by massive attack by automated/bot attack (such as SQUIDWARD). Finally, I don't know if level 1 (formerly known as "Overwhelming level of vandalism. Database lock recommended.") was ever legitimately called. Thus, I have reverted it back to 5. Please be careful in judging the situation in future not to cause unnecessary panic. Thank you, Misza 13 T C 13:22, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
Warm welcomeI'd just like to thank you for the welcome you gave me, so, thanks :) S-m-r-t 16:19, 16 March 2006 (UTC) User: Ad it alI recently read your comment on Naconkantari's talk page about putting my cousins pleas to him in BJAODN, and I must say I am insulted. I believe, despite his actions, he should be treated fairly, and I believe an informal apology is in order. Trosk 00:02, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Mini Thanks!Congratulations on your victory in the war against vandalism on Mini today. Many thanks! SteveBaker 14:32, 17 March 2006 (UTC) User trollingHey Misza13, a couple of weeks back, you had some dealings with ROGNNTUDJUU!. At the time you warned him that his actions were borderline trolling and spamming. Well, the user is back and doing much of the same things. He deleted the comment you left on his user page: [1]. The user continues to delete comments off the talk pages at his own whim and reply to them on other talk pages if he feels like it. What kind of action do you advise from here?-- Metros232 23:58, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my talk page, and for reporting this one to WP:AIV. Much appreciate. Gwernol 15:57, 18 March 2006 (UTC) Bouncing Souls moveThanks for the help with the Bouncing Souls move. bmearns, KSC( talk) 22:18, 18 March 2006 (UTC) ThanksThanks for reverting vandal on my user page [2]. -- Ugur Basak 23:15, 18 March 2006 (UTC) CSDYour personal monobook is appearing in CAT:CSD. Your edit summaries do not appear that you really want this deleted. If you do please make an edit to it, specificy PLEASE DELETE, or leave me a talk message. If you do not want this deleted, please examine it for why it may be getting categorzied for deletion. Thanks, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xaosflux ( talk • contribs) 04:34, March 19, 2006
Stop vandalising my pageI explain on my user talk page how I deal with posts. If you do not like it, we have to agree to differ. Reverts on other users' talk pages are vandalism and I expect you to stop it. ROGNNTUDJUU! 16:09, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Thank you!Thank you for updating my vandalism counter. :) - Trysha ( talk) 09:56, 20 March 2006 (UTC) Renovate PageHi, I saw that you are doing userpage renovations and I was wondering if I could get mine renovated. Something like yours would be good. Thanks L e idi ot 10:21, 20 March 2006 (UTC) Hello Misza Have you done any research or do you know anything about the organization called the Club of Rome? Quite obviously the initial entry was written by The Club of Rome itself which of course would fail to mention that in fact they are an organization dedicated to reducing the population of "undesirables" such as yourself. They are one of the leading proponents of these draconian New World Order methodologies which include cold malthusian analysis and a eugenics approach to "culling" the population. Wikipedia could be a very liberating and informative source of real information about the world around us but first it has to have completely accurate information. Have you researched before you deleted my accurate depiction of the club of Rome? Christopher Broder ( 69.113.25.112 ( talk · contribs))
Birthday^_^ Thanks. Happy early birthday to you, too! Big 18 for me tomorrow, though I still have a lot of work to do 'till I consider myself an adult :) — Deckill e r 22:36, 24 March 2006 (UTC) It is proper isn't it?I do believe that my edits to Talk:Quantile are proper. Could you please comment on some sources I have compiled. 68.78.35.117 03:25, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Re:VandalismReally appreciate the assisstance there. What is it with some people ? Find on my userpage a list of Wikipedia protocol that will be of use to you. Go ahead and make a copy for your use. Again, appreciate the assisstance. Martial Law 07:42, 25 March 2006 (UTC) :) Happy birthday to you also![]() Happy birthday! Our birthdays are one day apart :) — Deckill e r 23:28, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
![]()
![]() Happy Birthday Misza13! thanks for doing my user page by the way L e idi ot 02:47, 26 March 2006 (UTC) Happy Birthday, see you on IRC, and have a good one! -- Ali K 05:50, 26 March 2006 (UTC) Happy Birthday, ![]() I saw on Esperanza it is your birthday? Congratulations!! Gryffindor Thanks......for the birthday wishes :) — FireFox • T [14:11, 26 March 2006] EsperanzaThanks for the welcome. I'll do my best :-) — Wh o uk ( talk) 21:33, 27 March 2006 (UTC) Happy birthdayHappy Birth day - I missed the party as I was detained at another wikipedian's birth day party. -- Bhadani 16:26, 28 March 2006 (UTC) Birthday greetings![]() -- h y dkat 05:14, 29 March 2006 (UTC) Re: Edit anniversary
Re: Block of User:GrueHmmm... Isn't 48 hours a bit too long for a "cool down" penalty? Misza 13 T C 19:59, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
|