![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Nazism sidebar. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Kautilya,
I have reverted your edit at Talk:2017 China–India border standoff which strike-throughed certain comments in certain t/p discussions. Per talk-page guidelines we seldom strike out comments of banned/blocked users without any other solid reason.This is only allowed at XFDs/RfCs/RMs et al to prevent blocked sock-puppets/ban-evaders from biasing a consensus.Regards:) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 17:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 101.56.218.38 ( talk) 04:47, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Nice work Brunswicknic ( talk) 12:13, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bay Area Rapid Transit. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
If you wish, please could you share your opinion here about the version of the page 'Sino-Indian War' that must be protected? Thanks, The Discoverer ( talk) 11:46, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bosaso. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Per WP:REDACT: "But if anyone has already replied to or quoted your original comment, changing your comment may deprive any replies of their original context, and this should be avoided. Once others have replied, or even if no one's replied but it's been more than a short while, if you wish to change or delete your comment, it is commonly best practice to indicate your changes." You can't edit your comment that has been already replied. [1] D4iNa4 ( talk) 11:12, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Reddy dynasty is repeatedly vandalised by an editor named "Foodie 377" probably from Reddy community. He is making abuse comments on M. Somasekhara Sharma saying he is fake historian. Sharma said reddies of Kondaveedu are vassals to Musunuri Nayaks. That person is not accepting it though sources are provided by previous editor "Masioq". Kindly deal with the issue. Weckkrum ( talk) 16:55, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017 Berkeley protests. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
When you've got a moment, could you take a look at Gauri Lankesh? It's still getting a lot of views, and it needs more substance. Vanamonde ( talk) 15:36, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Theresa May. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
The language of "exact" cognate irked me, it is not an exact cognate, as far as I have read, the nearest cognate is of "x" sound is "ksha" sound. It sounded a little pompous. The other edit, regarding Helmand clues is so vague, I know it is sourced from a book, but those statements like "earliest Saraswati" are unbased on any research, there is no such evidence whatsoever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kriteesh ( talk • contribs) 18:03, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi, could you please clarify your stance at the Talk:Shina language page? There seems to be confusion as to what you might think. Willard84 ( talk) 07:45, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Kautilya3, I was just wondering what progress has been made on the name-change of this excellent little article? And could you put a word in on my discussion about moving Dharamsala to Dharamshala (and current Dharamshala to Dharamshala (disambiguation)? (Or simply move the articles over if you can?) Gherkinmad ( talk) 18:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- EncycloPetey ( talk) 22:28, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
You have also violated your own advice at WP:STATUSQUO. I tried an alternative wording, based on your comments, but you reverted for a third time. -- EncycloPetey ( talk) 22:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Galkayo. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Since you made no comment on talk page, I would like to leave a note here. Talking about WP:CON, right now 3 people are on agreement while only 2 are opposing the version, and none of their opposes are noteworthy. Is there any reason why you reverted me [2]? The version that I am reverting, doesn't have consensus nor it is a stable version. The problems have been already highlighted in best manners on the talk page, see the comments of me, Satpal Dandiwal, Capitals00. Majority of the 5,200 removed bytes involve the spam of {{#if: {{{AD|}}}|AD|CE}} . D4iNa4 ( talk) 15:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello Kautilya. Can u explain me wats wrong in adding Subordinates of Musunuri Nayaks content. Mallampalli Somasekhara Sharma clearly mentioned reddies of Kondaveedu are subordinates to Musunuri Nayaks Weckkrum ( talk) 22:25, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Please expand this page Weckkrum ( talk) 22:25, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
In what way is it necessary to have legends section in of origin of Kammas regarding belthi reddy origin? It seems completely baseless......Talbot theories doesn't work always ......Talbot definition of formation of modern Andhra castes post Vijayanagara empire is utterly foolish. .. Leave his theories to himself.... Weckkrum ( talk) 22:28, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Please merge this article or redirect to main mala caste page Weckkrum ( talk) 22:29, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sex characteristics. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Persecution of Hindus. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - Mfarazbaig ( talk) 18:38, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Timeline of the Trump presidency, 2017 Q3. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello Kautilya3, I request your help and input for the content dispute at the page Spanggur Gap. The contention is whether a paragraph can be included or not. Please also take a look at the discussion on the talk page. Thanks, The Discoverer ( talk) 19:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tulle massacre. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Since you've worked on related pages before, care to step in with this user? SPA, edit-warring, competence issues, and I simply don't have the time to deal with it appropriately. Vanamonde ( talk) 16:12, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bukhara. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello Sir can you review my article. Atrisomkshraj ( talk) 18:53, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for being a welcoming member to the Wikipedia community.
Neilc314 (
talk)
04:02, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Since you seem to frequent these topic areas, can you comment on my recent removal of several sources (which IMO are unreliable) from Operation Pawan?I have some thoughts that this may be a reliable one but am not very sure.Regards:) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 07:09, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Peter Hore. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello Kautilya, You undid an edit I made to the Sikkim page, saying it was unsourced. I just changed the word "state" to "nation" for the sake of clarity. I don't think this needs a source. Thanks, HeroBobGamer ( talk) 00:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Abdullah II of Jordan. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Malta convoys. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
There has been a proposal to topic ban you due to tendentious editing. You can find the thread at ANI. Sardeeph ( talk) 11:26, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
TomBarker23. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
This is related to your tendentious editing. Please refer any comments to the discussion about you on ANI.
TomBarker23 (
talk)
13:01, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. I see that you were already notified above, but wanted to make it its own section to make sure you see it. The discussion can be found here:
Wikipedia:Administrators noticeboard/Incidents#Topic ban for tendentious editor Kautilya3 --
Darth Mike
(talk)
13:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
I just laughed out loud after reading the accusations against you at ANI. I hope you are enjoying some of the autumn. Ms Sarah Welch ( talk) 21:45, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Operation Anubis. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Does the source in this , appear reliable to you? Stuart A.P. Murray is not a historian. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 20:34, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
An old problem has cropped up again. I've added a cite for the contentious material (thank you for your suggestion of looking at Hyderabad State) but would appreciate some extra eyes on it for now... Pinkbeast ( talk) 13:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour. Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump–Russia dossier. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
A newbie Wikipedian turned blogger says:
...but all my edits were brutally reverted. I was only trying to organize the existing article to conform to the Neutral Point of View, to make it easier to read, and to put in logical criticism to the Helmand Theory, in completely encyclopedic language, but one of the self-proclaimed guardians of Wikipedian neutrality reverted my edits, placed a sanction upon my head, and wasted hours of my work under some silly excuse of lack of citations. I have had great respect for Wikipedia but since it is a worldwide free encyclopedia, today it is sadly controlled by Leftist dictators, like User: Kautilya3. (emphasis added)
-- Kautilya3 ( talk) 22:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Mar4d (
talk)
14:02, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Dear Kautilya. I have made significant edits on this page which you also edit. This is about Jammu massacres yet there is way too much text about unrelated events in Mirpur and Rajoi. There are seperate articles for these and they divert the topic by diluting it with so much unecessary information about a massacre elsewhere the other issue is that the Mirpir massacre page does not even mention the much larger Jammu genocide but the Jammu Massacre page is forced to accomidate Mirpur I may be wrong but it seems people are trying to diminish the genocide in Jammu by over emphasising Mirpur and Rajoi. Please can you discuss on talk page ? Thanks in advance. 2A02:C7D:151D:D100:7871:7BC2:3DB8:7A1C ( talk) 09:16, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Read the article Jammu massacres of 1947. Looking at your contributions its shocking Considering that your questioning my edit since you have been active on that page ofteb the massacre of Muslims of Hari Singh article is proof and I will link that article now and re add the the legitimate information. ShaniAli1lo ( talk) 00:24, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Recently, someone changed "Sinhala Kingdom" to "Kingdom of Polonnaruwa", which has no mention in original text. Please fix this mistake, Thank you. 117.192.206.249 ( talk) 21:26, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, sir. It is this page Rani Padmini and it says its locked. There is "Kingdom of Polonnaruwa" in first paragraph, this should instead be "Sinhala Kingdom" based on original source, please check history of the page. 117.192.206.249 ( talk) 22:00, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Kautilya. The mysterious horses are in my edit notice. You can put an image into yours, here, if you like, and it will appear every time somebody edits your page. My edit notice has grown into greater elaboration, as a "switch" which changes images automatically every 24 hours, in a way RexxS kindly coded for me. (The horses have changed into a waterfall now.:-)) You could ask him, too! If you try it out yourself with a favorite image, or some text, you can see if you like the effect. Any image will work, including animations. I used to have an animated gif of Laurel and Hardy dancing, which made everybody laugh... people turned up on my page full of giggles, which was fun. Sadly, that gif has been deleted now. Bishonen | talk 16:01, 20 November 2017 (UTC).
Thanks for the message on my page. Burundee ( talk) 15:51, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Oops, so sorry! Anyways, you could also delete these messages from me completely. It was just one of gratitude (and not important enough to be permanent. :-)) I have edited wikipedia pages previously, but not much. I usually do something on the fly if and when I notice something really wrong (esp if outrageous!). Cheers! Burundee ( talk) 16:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Also, I am not sure how to push this post to the bottom any more. Sorry about that again! Burundee ( talk) 16:16, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political appointments by Donald Trump. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
I just equalised the article so it gives due importance to the genocide of Muslims but it seems Indian users find it hard to swallow please review my Mirpur edits ShaniAli1lo ( talk) 15:57, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Which "WP:PRIMARY" source do you object to? A.j.roberts ( talk) 20:14, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Policy
|
---|
|
Dear Kautilya3, I want to draw your attention to page Malegaon, if you can help or provide any suggestion. I created a request to semi-protect the article article. It seems IPs are vandalizing the page. CuriousPerson18375 ( talk) 23:35, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation concerning Caste system in India, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee,
TransporterMan (
TALK)
16:32, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
(Delivered by
MediationBot,
on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Hello, Kautilya3. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Please keep an eye on Lohana page, there has been recent vandalism of sourced content by user "Harsh54". He is claiming Lohanas are "Surayavashi from Iran/Afghanistan" and other absurd pseudo-history things without any source. I have restored as much as possible. 103.194.25.236 ( talk) 17:53, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
The "reliably sourced" opinion calling the organization "militant" is a biased perspective and against wikipedia guidelines. I am editing it to a more 'neutral point of view'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mntzr ( talk • contribs) 19:37, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
The organization does not describe itself as either militant or extremist. To then introduce it as such is wrong. The references are allegations with no named sources. Yes, it is true that they have been criticized as militant and extremists and that description belongs in the criticism or controversy section, not the introduction. Mntzr ( talk) 15:37, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Robert Mueller. Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at
Article. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.-- 樂號 ( talk) 04:23, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
what you have did will be see as an imperil or threat. Please do not game the system. And do not make modification that without reaching consensus.-- 樂號 ( talk) 04:25, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Brexit. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Kautilya3! Many months ago, we had some discussions on solar/lunar calendars. I have been reading through hundreds of historical stone/ copper/ etc inscriptions in the Buddhist, Hindu and Jaina traditions, for the last few weeks. Ran into something that I thought might interest you, if that topic ever needs a revisit. This by Jacobi is a decent introduction to calendars in an epigraphical context, what the solar and lunar were in different regional contexts. I have and will send you some additional stuff by your wiki-email link. Happy holidays, Ms Sarah Welch ( talk) 05:48, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Emily Thornberry. Legobot ( talk) 04:31, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jerusalem. Legobot ( talk) 04:33, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2017 Doklam standoff. Since you had some involvement with the 2017 Doklam standoff redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ansh 666 03:19, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Israel. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2018! |
Hello Kautilya3, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2018. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Canada. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States recognition of Jerusalem. Legobot ( talk) 04:45, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump–Russia dossier. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
You reverted my recent edit with the comment "we need to WP:STICKTOSOURCE; there is no evidence that Nehru ever thought of Hyderabad as an independent state". But this is utterly absurd! When the British withdrew from India in 1947, all their subsidiary alliances were abandoned. The princely states had never been part of British India, so they could not be handed over to the two new Dominions created from the British possessions. Pursuant to the Indian Independence Act 1947 they became completely independent, unless and until they acceded to one of the new Dominions, which most of them speedily did, although the process was slow in the case of the Princely States of Pakistan. A series of wars was fought between India and Pakistan precisely because Kashmir was left as an independent state. The Nizam of Hyderabad fought hard to retain his independence. Do you really not grasp any of this? Moonraker ( talk) 05:31, 27 December 2017 (UTC) Moonraker ( talk) 05:31, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Russian presidential election, 2018. Legobot ( talk) 04:30, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Josephus. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit:
[5] to
Exodus of Kashmiri Hindus seemed less than neutral. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
JosephusOfJerusalem (
talk)
09:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
I see that you have removed content cited to RS with a tendentious edit summary. Very interestingly the sequence of events I see on the page is that Anmolbhat has added a wall of clobbered Hindu POV text (copyright too I suspect) [6] which you conveniently are not worried about. Then comes along NadirAli who has added properly cited information [7] which happens to be too neutral for Hindu POV. You first try to soften the wording from ″false propaganda″ to ″exaggerated″ [8]. When NadirAli then tells you to WP:STICKTOSOURCE [9] you then remove the entire text he added, [10] although you had no issue with that text's presence earlier. All this is a display of tendentious editing and if you do not cease this disruptive behaviour you will soon find yourself in an AE or ANI thread justifying why Wikipedia should still allow such editing. JosephusOfJerusalem ( talk) 09:38, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Talk:Ramgarhia#appalled. You may be interested.
Winged Blades
Godric
07:12, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Kashmiris. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as " edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. JosephusOfJerusalem ( talk) 15:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
I have responded at my talk page. -- G ( talk) 13:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Dear Kautilya3 and MBlaze Lightning,
Please help with this suspected case of habitual repeat offender whom you both have tried to warn in the past, but he keeps repeating the same cycle. Please take it to the logical conclusion, by taking it to those forums/admins who can see this person either fix himself quickly or else he finally gets stopped permanently. He seems to be deliberately and repeatedly doing this to multiple editors on the multiple articles while covering/archiving his tracks. Experienced and smart enough to evade the perm banning by gaming the system for far too long. He is suspect for the systematic canvassing too.
1. Immediately and permanently sanction him from all the articles with India in namespace or category.
2. Put him on watch list of experienced admins.
3. Get some responsible unbiased admin to investigate his past tracks if those sufficiently warrant a perm ban on all his accounts and related IPs, specially if he does not own up and fix within next 24 hours.
He knows what he is doing (wrong). He is very experienced and extremely good at it (disguise and game). And, he has gotten away with it (time to bring the curtains down). Hence, he might even be beyond "cure him with compassion" (sadly).
I do not have the tools and sufficient knowledge of wikipedia to affect that. Hence, requesting you both to take it forward to permanently fix his "long-term below-the-radar successful-gamer-and-evader repeat-offender" behavior.
Thanks. 202.156.182.84 ( talk) 20:19, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Kautilya3: Popular you are, your talk page is very active these days! I wiki-emailed you some sources from different sides on some topics we touched upon a few months ago. Ms Sarah Welch ( talk) 00:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Armenian Genocide. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Greetings,
It is being planned to organize Wikigraphists Bootcamp in India, please fill out the survey form to help the organizers. Your responses will help organizers understand what level of demand there is for the event (how many people in your community think it is important that the event happens). At the end of the day, the participants will turn out to have knowledge to create drawings, illustrations, diagrams, maps, graphs, bar charts etc. and get to know to how to tune the images to meet the QI and FP criteria. For more information and link to survey form, please visit Talk:Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India). MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:46, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Southern Transitional Council. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Atleast you seem reasonable on the Jammu article just wantes to balance article nothing new was added anyway common sense prevails. 82.132.187.153 ( talk) 22:59, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello sorry to bother you but someone removed the heading and the article link again for no reason citing only "heading not needed" let me argue why it is. Its a historical demographic which no longer exists and merging it to current populations is diluting its historical importance plus the link to the causes of the demographics allows user to switch ti the main article explaining the change just like on the Mirpur page. 82.132.229.123 ( talk) 19:25, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, edit summary for this revert is irrelevant to the sentence where citation was added, please self-undo your revert. Regards -- Omer123hussain ( talk) 13:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi there! I want to know if there is any shortcut to becoming an admin on Wikipedia? ZAthe hero ( talk) 13:27, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jesse Hamilton. Legobot ( talk) 04:33, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Foreign policy of the Donald Trump administration. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Dear Kautilya, I hope that you are doing well. Would you be able to kindly fix Template:Lang-hin? It should be used for Hindustani in the same way that Template:Lang-hi is used for Hindi. I appreciate your time and help! With regards, Anupam Talk 21:35, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Kautilya3,
you reverted my edit in C. Christine Fair giving the reason that the content is "pointless gossip". This is not the case. The investigation for slander does not constitute "pointless gossip". Her diatribe about the German police and the Frankfurt airport, which she calls "Frankfart Hellport" (HuffPo article) might be gossip but the german reporting and my edit aren't.
Regards Haage42 ( talk) 14:16, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Coachella Valley Church. Legobot ( talk) 04:30, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
I only reinstated the indefinite semi-protect after pending changes trail ended. At that time, the consensus was to revert the protection back to the original pre-pending changes status. OhanaUnited Talk page 16:06, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Respected Sir/Mam, In a reply to my edit that was done on 25 January, 2018 you unanimously declared my edits as vandalism but with due respect I want to cite sources of my edit and prove that my edits were correct and Baltistan is a part of Republic Of India under the unlawful occupation of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. At the time of independence and demarcation of international boundary all the regions previously under the erstwhile princely state of Jammu and Kashmir were shown as part of India in accordance to Radcliffe line and the same became part of Instrument of Accession [ [12]] signed by Maharaja Hari Singh and Provisional Government of India. Hence it is a generous request on my part to recognise my edits as authentic and act as a credibility booster for Wikipedia and its editors and readers community. At last as a responsible editor i am not presently making any changes, edits or modifications to the article relating to Baltistan. Waiting eagerly for an eatly reply. Yours Sincerely, — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Truth should prevail ( talk • contribs)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Blue Lives Matter. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I have given an explanation at the Talk page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.127.246.106 ( talk) 00:25, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Legobot ( talk) 04:32, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, Kautilya3 for the heads up. Yaditiva ( talk) 04:56, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
On 18 October 1947 he is 'reported to have' met Maharaja Hari Singh at the request of India's Home Minister Vallabhbhai Patel to persuade the maharaja to accede to India. He was accompanied by the RSS Delhi pracharak Vasantrao Oak and the RSS United Provinces sanghchalak Narendrajit Singh. Although it is believed that the maharaja agreed to the proposal, the accession was not signed until 26 October after the Indo-Pakistani War of 1947.
I am going to wait for a response. You can also ask question if the edit is not appearing good to you. My edits were really simple in my view. --
G (
talk)
06:23, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
References
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Justice Party (South Korea). Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
In 2017 - 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India chapter (WMIN) and user groups will pilot a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program (Code name: Project Tiger) will:
The objective of the program is to provide laptops and internet stipends for existing editors who need support to contribute more actively. 50 basic model Acer Chromebooks and Internet stipends for 100 contributors are available for distribution. Provided resources are the sole property of the beneficiaries and should be used for the betterment of the movement.
If you're an active Wikimedian, and interested to receive support from this project, please apply. It will take around 10 minutes of your time, and will ask descriptive questions about your contribution to Indic Wikimedia projects.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 08:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Nizam of Hyderabad. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.-- Omer123hussain ( talk) 12:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
This is not a WP:HISTRS; do not use it; also do not modify sourced content with WP:OR.Have you looked at the policy pages cited there and understood what the issues are?
I m warning you last time.Who are you to decide whether the sources are fake or not?And you cannot call a reputed press website fake.Consider this as a last threat from my side. Jainallotrope ( talk) 13:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Nizam of Hyderabad. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.-- Omer123hussain ( talk) 12:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
This is not a WP:HISTRS; do not use it; also do not modify sourced content with WP:OR.Have you looked at the policy pages cited there and understood what the issues are?
I m warning you last time.Who are you to decide whether the sources are fake or not?And you cannot call a reputed press website fake.Consider this as a last threat from my side. Jainallotrope ( talk) 13:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The National Memo. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your reply. You are welcome to restore/replace the material you find helpful. I hope this helps. With regards, Anupam Talk 06:35, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Trump–Russia dossier allegations. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dras, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tiger Hill ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
I see you're avoiding that discussion :) But, could you weigh in and help figure out what is appropriate? Thanks!-- regentspark ( comment) 16:29, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Real News Update. Legobot ( talk) 04:33, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
There is no source that is required here; there is a factual error. If for India, there is a mention of "Devanagri" than for China it should be "Mandarine Chinese" and not "Chinese Numerals". This summary page should rightly mention, "Indian Numerals" or "Hindu Numerals". Also, why is India is conjoined with South East Asia in this page. India section should be separate just like the China section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karan Sharma82 ( talk • contribs) 06:32, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
Kashmir conflict.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
03:21, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:B'Tselem. Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Holocaust denial. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Racial views of Donald Trump. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Kautilya. Re your ping on the Kashmir conflict page. I'm not really sure what to do. The discussion is way too complicated to follow for anyone outside the conflict and, as long as editors stick to the letter of the sanctions, it is hard to sanction anyone. Personally, I think if we remove two editors (and perhaps a third, all who shall go unnamed) from the discussion, things will improve. But, as we've seen on AE, it is impossible to get admin action in this area. One option is to do something along the lines of what was done for the lead on Jerusalem (a three "uninvolved editor" panel) but even that seems difficult unless we can get two, clear, competing versions of the text in place. All that said, something needs to be done, I just don't know what that something is. -- regentspark ( comment) 15:44, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:National Rifle Association. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
What a beautiful user page! Thank you for sharing such nice thoughts and historical information with those who come upon it. Randy Kryn ( talk) 13:13, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political appointments by Donald Trump. Legobot ( talk) 04:30, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
In 2017 – 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India Chapter (WMIN) and user groups from India, are piloting a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program will (a) support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and (b) sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.
Phase (a) has been completed, during which active contributors were awarded laptops and internet stipends. Phase (b) will be a contest in which editors will come together and develop a writing contest focused on content gaps. Each month three individual prizes will be awarded to each community based on their contribution for the month. The prizes worth 3,000 INR, 2000 INR, and 1,000 INR, will be awarded to the top contributors for each month. The contest started at March 1, 2018, 0:00, and will end at May 31, 2018, 23:59 (IST). Useful links are as follows:
Looking forward your participation, all the best. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) at 22:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC).
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot ( talk) 04:30, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
I filed a request for response at Wikipeida dispute resolution notice board. I included you also as you were involved in discussioin on Raju/Talk page. I appreciate that you at least thought it was right to change the Raju article by including the information contained in my sources. Sharkslayer87 ( talk) 22:47, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
I've recreated this after dredging through all the available sources. I've a feeling that the usual suspects will try to pull a fast one here (again; it was deleted via AfD the first time because the creator didn't know what they were doing) so I'd appreciate it if you watchlisted this. Vanamonde ( talk) 13:45, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Doug Ford Jr.. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Buddy - It is a good edit you made on Anantnag page - neutral and backed by valid article (better than mine). I am new on Wikipedia (for editing). Hoping more interactions.
Lptx ( talk) 19:53, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Hope to interact and discuss more. :) Lptx ( talk) 19:55, 28 March 2018 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Help expand the article Maureen Wroblewitz. Thanks you very much. 171.248.63.149 ( talk) 10:21, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Abiy Ahmed Ali. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Can you explain this?-- Godric ki Kothri talk to me 14:18, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Regarding Narasimhan et al. (2018 preprint), The Genomic Formation of South and Central Asia, read Tony Joseph, How We, The Indians, Came To Be. The Narasimhan-article will prove be a watershed (big words, I know). Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 13:35, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
However, the hypothesis that an early form of Indo-Aryan was spoken already by the people of the Indus Civilization (or Mature Harappan culture, c. 2600-2000 B.C.) has its supporters, especially in India;[5] they claim that the Aryan languages did not come to the subcontinent from outside but have always been there.[6] In his bold new book, Archaeology and language,[7] Colin Renfrew has given some weight to this view by suggesting that Indo-European speakers may have brought agriculture from Anatolia to Baluchistan already by 6000 B.C.[8] [1]
(For some reason, I never realized that this paper was available online.) -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 18:33, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
References
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Point 5353. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — MBL talk 01:04, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, R.P. Kangle's works have been used as a source to claim about other meanings of the word "dasa" on Slavery in India. However, I'm not really sure about it. Thing is that it's been poorly sourced.
For example i asked to verify source here. Part 3 of his book series on Arthasastra is not called "A critical edition"as claimed in the citation used, Only part 1 is. Part 3 is called "A Study". Even the ISBN no. is of Part I. See ( https://www.abebooks.com/book-search/author/r-p-kangle/)
In another case, Vol 2 and 3 of his book series on Arthshahstra are used, however they both are separate books and as pointed out by me here, no page number has been detailed.
I cannot find these books to verify what is said. But the poor sourcing done on the article raises several doubts. If you can help, I will appreciate it. There seem to be other problems as well, including self-drawn inferences from primary sources, but I will focus on that later. MonsterHunter32 ( talk) 05:10, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Hey, I came across Kautilya5010 ( talk · contribs). In the past, usernames similar to those of long term editors have been used for disruption. This might be just coincidence as well. You might want to keep an eye out. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 15:27, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:CSA Steaua Bucure?ti (football). Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
I have known about Dasas for years. I actually wasn't even looking for Aryan-Dasa conflict, I was only wanted to add various opinions of whether they think dasa denotes a slave or not and how it came to be so.
This is how I stumbled upon Aryan-Dasa conflict in Rig Veda. Now I am not saying they were different races, they may be even the same. This is not about races. But there was a conflict and the Dasas are usually referred to as enemies of Aryas in Rig Veda. Regardless, what I added was how the term Dasa evolved into denoting a slave, it wasn't about racial differences.
You need to let it go and not remove it just because you disagree with it. You can add contrary opinions, but don't remove reliable scholars.
The truth is needed. And the truth is that your actions are not motivated by any real dispute, it is plain censorship. Please don't impede me in maming contributions to Wikipedia. MonsterHunter32 ( talk) 22:22, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
It is okay for you to cast aspersions on sources and my edits and warn me." If you don't think it is ok, you should report it WP:ANI, with evidence. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 23:50, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
They were not the "Dasas of the Rig Veda" and Trautmann isn't saying that they were. Just because English uses the word "slave" for slaves, you can't say the Englishmen enslaved the Slavs. Language is much more complicated than your linear analysis.
Rather, the Rig Veda introduced the term "Dasa" for rival non-Aryan tribes. Some of these tribes were apparently enslaved giving rise to the meaning of "Dasa" as slave. (But this happened in later times, i.e., after 1200 BC). And it happened in Punjab and the Gangetic plains. By the time it happened, there were no "Rigvedic tribes" any more. The Aryans were forming states. The Rigvedic tribes didn't have any states. Try reading this paper to understand the whole context:
Cheers, Kautilya3 ( talk) 01:19, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
The Rigvedic term dasa for enemy tribes came to be employed to mean slave in the later Rigvedic period. Scholars envisage that this was due to the enslavement of some of the enemy tribes by the Aryan settlers. [1] [2]
References
- ^ Sharma, Sudras in Ancient India 1990, pp. 23–24.
- ^ Trautmann, Aryans and British India 1997, p. 224.
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States Government. Legobot ( talk) 04:31, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
There is a wikilink in article Aslam_Khan_(Pakistani_brigadier)#Return_to_Pakistan which is is linked to Rehmatullah Khan. According to the article, Rehmatullah Khan is father of Aslam Khan. But Rehmatullah Khan is redirected to Rehmat Khan which is squash player and has nothing to do with Aslam Khan. Since you are creator of Aslam Khan, and you added this link, what do you want to do with this incorrect link. On the other hand, redirect of Rehmatullah Khan to Rehmat Khan may be incorrect, because no one knows Rehmant Khan as Rehmatullah Khan. One option is to expand Rehmatullah Khan (father of Aslam Khan) article.-- Spasage ( talk) 16:21, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
You are Most Welcome
Fylindfotberserk (
talk)
13:25, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Justice Party (South Korea). Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Holocaust denial. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
I'm working at the CERI SCiences Po and I'm trying to ùodify C Jaffrelot's page at his request. I wrote the page on SPIRE so I am just trying to copy some of this page's elements on wikipedia and actualize the bibliography. Nothing much, so please be kind to make me able to do these modifications that C Jaffrelot who is my boss sked me to do. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by JuchieG ( talk • contribs)
A disruptive editor keeps on adding non-notable quotes on Wikiquote just to promote hatred against non-Hindus like Muslims and Christians and their religions. Even if the quotes are non-notable it doesn't matter to him. Another editor with right-wing views keeps on supporting him. Can you comment on here [22] on Wikiquote's Administrators' noticeboard? Thanks. MonsterHunter32 ( talk) 17:29, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
If the quotes are supported by valid references, why it shouldn't go in? Just because someone has chosen to be ignorant of facts, doesn't mean facts shouldn't be presented. Kautilya2018 ( talk) 17:36, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Nazism sidebar. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Kautilya,
I have reverted your edit at Talk:2017 China–India border standoff which strike-throughed certain comments in certain t/p discussions. Per talk-page guidelines we seldom strike out comments of banned/blocked users without any other solid reason.This is only allowed at XFDs/RfCs/RMs et al to prevent blocked sock-puppets/ban-evaders from biasing a consensus.Regards:) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 17:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 101.56.218.38 ( talk) 04:47, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Nice work Brunswicknic ( talk) 12:13, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bay Area Rapid Transit. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
If you wish, please could you share your opinion here about the version of the page 'Sino-Indian War' that must be protected? Thanks, The Discoverer ( talk) 11:46, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bosaso. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Per WP:REDACT: "But if anyone has already replied to or quoted your original comment, changing your comment may deprive any replies of their original context, and this should be avoided. Once others have replied, or even if no one's replied but it's been more than a short while, if you wish to change or delete your comment, it is commonly best practice to indicate your changes." You can't edit your comment that has been already replied. [1] D4iNa4 ( talk) 11:12, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Reddy dynasty is repeatedly vandalised by an editor named "Foodie 377" probably from Reddy community. He is making abuse comments on M. Somasekhara Sharma saying he is fake historian. Sharma said reddies of Kondaveedu are vassals to Musunuri Nayaks. That person is not accepting it though sources are provided by previous editor "Masioq". Kindly deal with the issue. Weckkrum ( talk) 16:55, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017 Berkeley protests. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
When you've got a moment, could you take a look at Gauri Lankesh? It's still getting a lot of views, and it needs more substance. Vanamonde ( talk) 15:36, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Theresa May. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
The language of "exact" cognate irked me, it is not an exact cognate, as far as I have read, the nearest cognate is of "x" sound is "ksha" sound. It sounded a little pompous. The other edit, regarding Helmand clues is so vague, I know it is sourced from a book, but those statements like "earliest Saraswati" are unbased on any research, there is no such evidence whatsoever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kriteesh ( talk • contribs) 18:03, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi, could you please clarify your stance at the Talk:Shina language page? There seems to be confusion as to what you might think. Willard84 ( talk) 07:45, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Kautilya3, I was just wondering what progress has been made on the name-change of this excellent little article? And could you put a word in on my discussion about moving Dharamsala to Dharamshala (and current Dharamshala to Dharamshala (disambiguation)? (Or simply move the articles over if you can?) Gherkinmad ( talk) 18:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- EncycloPetey ( talk) 22:28, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
You have also violated your own advice at WP:STATUSQUO. I tried an alternative wording, based on your comments, but you reverted for a third time. -- EncycloPetey ( talk) 22:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Galkayo. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Since you made no comment on talk page, I would like to leave a note here. Talking about WP:CON, right now 3 people are on agreement while only 2 are opposing the version, and none of their opposes are noteworthy. Is there any reason why you reverted me [2]? The version that I am reverting, doesn't have consensus nor it is a stable version. The problems have been already highlighted in best manners on the talk page, see the comments of me, Satpal Dandiwal, Capitals00. Majority of the 5,200 removed bytes involve the spam of {{#if: {{{AD|}}}|AD|CE}} . D4iNa4 ( talk) 15:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello Kautilya. Can u explain me wats wrong in adding Subordinates of Musunuri Nayaks content. Mallampalli Somasekhara Sharma clearly mentioned reddies of Kondaveedu are subordinates to Musunuri Nayaks Weckkrum ( talk) 22:25, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Please expand this page Weckkrum ( talk) 22:25, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
In what way is it necessary to have legends section in of origin of Kammas regarding belthi reddy origin? It seems completely baseless......Talbot theories doesn't work always ......Talbot definition of formation of modern Andhra castes post Vijayanagara empire is utterly foolish. .. Leave his theories to himself.... Weckkrum ( talk) 22:28, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Please merge this article or redirect to main mala caste page Weckkrum ( talk) 22:29, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sex characteristics. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Persecution of Hindus. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - Mfarazbaig ( talk) 18:38, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Timeline of the Trump presidency, 2017 Q3. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello Kautilya3, I request your help and input for the content dispute at the page Spanggur Gap. The contention is whether a paragraph can be included or not. Please also take a look at the discussion on the talk page. Thanks, The Discoverer ( talk) 19:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tulle massacre. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Since you've worked on related pages before, care to step in with this user? SPA, edit-warring, competence issues, and I simply don't have the time to deal with it appropriately. Vanamonde ( talk) 16:12, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bukhara. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello Sir can you review my article. Atrisomkshraj ( talk) 18:53, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for being a welcoming member to the Wikipedia community.
Neilc314 (
talk)
04:02, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Since you seem to frequent these topic areas, can you comment on my recent removal of several sources (which IMO are unreliable) from Operation Pawan?I have some thoughts that this may be a reliable one but am not very sure.Regards:) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 07:09, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Peter Hore. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello Kautilya, You undid an edit I made to the Sikkim page, saying it was unsourced. I just changed the word "state" to "nation" for the sake of clarity. I don't think this needs a source. Thanks, HeroBobGamer ( talk) 00:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Abdullah II of Jordan. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Malta convoys. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
There has been a proposal to topic ban you due to tendentious editing. You can find the thread at ANI. Sardeeph ( talk) 11:26, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
TomBarker23. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
This is related to your tendentious editing. Please refer any comments to the discussion about you on ANI.
TomBarker23 (
talk)
13:01, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. I see that you were already notified above, but wanted to make it its own section to make sure you see it. The discussion can be found here:
Wikipedia:Administrators noticeboard/Incidents#Topic ban for tendentious editor Kautilya3 --
Darth Mike
(talk)
13:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
I just laughed out loud after reading the accusations against you at ANI. I hope you are enjoying some of the autumn. Ms Sarah Welch ( talk) 21:45, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Operation Anubis. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Does the source in this , appear reliable to you? Stuart A.P. Murray is not a historian. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 20:34, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
An old problem has cropped up again. I've added a cite for the contentious material (thank you for your suggestion of looking at Hyderabad State) but would appreciate some extra eyes on it for now... Pinkbeast ( talk) 13:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour. Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump–Russia dossier. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
A newbie Wikipedian turned blogger says:
...but all my edits were brutally reverted. I was only trying to organize the existing article to conform to the Neutral Point of View, to make it easier to read, and to put in logical criticism to the Helmand Theory, in completely encyclopedic language, but one of the self-proclaimed guardians of Wikipedian neutrality reverted my edits, placed a sanction upon my head, and wasted hours of my work under some silly excuse of lack of citations. I have had great respect for Wikipedia but since it is a worldwide free encyclopedia, today it is sadly controlled by Leftist dictators, like User: Kautilya3. (emphasis added)
-- Kautilya3 ( talk) 22:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Mar4d (
talk)
14:02, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Dear Kautilya. I have made significant edits on this page which you also edit. This is about Jammu massacres yet there is way too much text about unrelated events in Mirpur and Rajoi. There are seperate articles for these and they divert the topic by diluting it with so much unecessary information about a massacre elsewhere the other issue is that the Mirpir massacre page does not even mention the much larger Jammu genocide but the Jammu Massacre page is forced to accomidate Mirpur I may be wrong but it seems people are trying to diminish the genocide in Jammu by over emphasising Mirpur and Rajoi. Please can you discuss on talk page ? Thanks in advance. 2A02:C7D:151D:D100:7871:7BC2:3DB8:7A1C ( talk) 09:16, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Read the article Jammu massacres of 1947. Looking at your contributions its shocking Considering that your questioning my edit since you have been active on that page ofteb the massacre of Muslims of Hari Singh article is proof and I will link that article now and re add the the legitimate information. ShaniAli1lo ( talk) 00:24, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Recently, someone changed "Sinhala Kingdom" to "Kingdom of Polonnaruwa", which has no mention in original text. Please fix this mistake, Thank you. 117.192.206.249 ( talk) 21:26, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, sir. It is this page Rani Padmini and it says its locked. There is "Kingdom of Polonnaruwa" in first paragraph, this should instead be "Sinhala Kingdom" based on original source, please check history of the page. 117.192.206.249 ( talk) 22:00, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Kautilya. The mysterious horses are in my edit notice. You can put an image into yours, here, if you like, and it will appear every time somebody edits your page. My edit notice has grown into greater elaboration, as a "switch" which changes images automatically every 24 hours, in a way RexxS kindly coded for me. (The horses have changed into a waterfall now.:-)) You could ask him, too! If you try it out yourself with a favorite image, or some text, you can see if you like the effect. Any image will work, including animations. I used to have an animated gif of Laurel and Hardy dancing, which made everybody laugh... people turned up on my page full of giggles, which was fun. Sadly, that gif has been deleted now. Bishonen | talk 16:01, 20 November 2017 (UTC).
Thanks for the message on my page. Burundee ( talk) 15:51, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Oops, so sorry! Anyways, you could also delete these messages from me completely. It was just one of gratitude (and not important enough to be permanent. :-)) I have edited wikipedia pages previously, but not much. I usually do something on the fly if and when I notice something really wrong (esp if outrageous!). Cheers! Burundee ( talk) 16:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Also, I am not sure how to push this post to the bottom any more. Sorry about that again! Burundee ( talk) 16:16, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political appointments by Donald Trump. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
I just equalised the article so it gives due importance to the genocide of Muslims but it seems Indian users find it hard to swallow please review my Mirpur edits ShaniAli1lo ( talk) 15:57, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Which "WP:PRIMARY" source do you object to? A.j.roberts ( talk) 20:14, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Policy
|
---|
|
Dear Kautilya3, I want to draw your attention to page Malegaon, if you can help or provide any suggestion. I created a request to semi-protect the article article. It seems IPs are vandalizing the page. CuriousPerson18375 ( talk) 23:35, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation concerning Caste system in India, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee,
TransporterMan (
TALK)
16:32, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
(Delivered by
MediationBot,
on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Hello, Kautilya3. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Please keep an eye on Lohana page, there has been recent vandalism of sourced content by user "Harsh54". He is claiming Lohanas are "Surayavashi from Iran/Afghanistan" and other absurd pseudo-history things without any source. I have restored as much as possible. 103.194.25.236 ( talk) 17:53, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
The "reliably sourced" opinion calling the organization "militant" is a biased perspective and against wikipedia guidelines. I am editing it to a more 'neutral point of view'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mntzr ( talk • contribs) 19:37, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
The organization does not describe itself as either militant or extremist. To then introduce it as such is wrong. The references are allegations with no named sources. Yes, it is true that they have been criticized as militant and extremists and that description belongs in the criticism or controversy section, not the introduction. Mntzr ( talk) 15:37, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Robert Mueller. Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at
Article. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.-- 樂號 ( talk) 04:23, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
what you have did will be see as an imperil or threat. Please do not game the system. And do not make modification that without reaching consensus.-- 樂號 ( talk) 04:25, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Brexit. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Kautilya3! Many months ago, we had some discussions on solar/lunar calendars. I have been reading through hundreds of historical stone/ copper/ etc inscriptions in the Buddhist, Hindu and Jaina traditions, for the last few weeks. Ran into something that I thought might interest you, if that topic ever needs a revisit. This by Jacobi is a decent introduction to calendars in an epigraphical context, what the solar and lunar were in different regional contexts. I have and will send you some additional stuff by your wiki-email link. Happy holidays, Ms Sarah Welch ( talk) 05:48, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Emily Thornberry. Legobot ( talk) 04:31, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jerusalem. Legobot ( talk) 04:33, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2017 Doklam standoff. Since you had some involvement with the 2017 Doklam standoff redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ansh 666 03:19, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Israel. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2018! |
Hello Kautilya3, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2018. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Canada. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States recognition of Jerusalem. Legobot ( talk) 04:45, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump–Russia dossier. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
You reverted my recent edit with the comment "we need to WP:STICKTOSOURCE; there is no evidence that Nehru ever thought of Hyderabad as an independent state". But this is utterly absurd! When the British withdrew from India in 1947, all their subsidiary alliances were abandoned. The princely states had never been part of British India, so they could not be handed over to the two new Dominions created from the British possessions. Pursuant to the Indian Independence Act 1947 they became completely independent, unless and until they acceded to one of the new Dominions, which most of them speedily did, although the process was slow in the case of the Princely States of Pakistan. A series of wars was fought between India and Pakistan precisely because Kashmir was left as an independent state. The Nizam of Hyderabad fought hard to retain his independence. Do you really not grasp any of this? Moonraker ( talk) 05:31, 27 December 2017 (UTC) Moonraker ( talk) 05:31, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Russian presidential election, 2018. Legobot ( talk) 04:30, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Josephus. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit:
[5] to
Exodus of Kashmiri Hindus seemed less than neutral. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
JosephusOfJerusalem (
talk)
09:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
I see that you have removed content cited to RS with a tendentious edit summary. Very interestingly the sequence of events I see on the page is that Anmolbhat has added a wall of clobbered Hindu POV text (copyright too I suspect) [6] which you conveniently are not worried about. Then comes along NadirAli who has added properly cited information [7] which happens to be too neutral for Hindu POV. You first try to soften the wording from ″false propaganda″ to ″exaggerated″ [8]. When NadirAli then tells you to WP:STICKTOSOURCE [9] you then remove the entire text he added, [10] although you had no issue with that text's presence earlier. All this is a display of tendentious editing and if you do not cease this disruptive behaviour you will soon find yourself in an AE or ANI thread justifying why Wikipedia should still allow such editing. JosephusOfJerusalem ( talk) 09:38, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Talk:Ramgarhia#appalled. You may be interested.
Winged Blades
Godric
07:12, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Kashmiris. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as " edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. JosephusOfJerusalem ( talk) 15:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
I have responded at my talk page. -- G ( talk) 13:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Dear Kautilya3 and MBlaze Lightning,
Please help with this suspected case of habitual repeat offender whom you both have tried to warn in the past, but he keeps repeating the same cycle. Please take it to the logical conclusion, by taking it to those forums/admins who can see this person either fix himself quickly or else he finally gets stopped permanently. He seems to be deliberately and repeatedly doing this to multiple editors on the multiple articles while covering/archiving his tracks. Experienced and smart enough to evade the perm banning by gaming the system for far too long. He is suspect for the systematic canvassing too.
1. Immediately and permanently sanction him from all the articles with India in namespace or category.
2. Put him on watch list of experienced admins.
3. Get some responsible unbiased admin to investigate his past tracks if those sufficiently warrant a perm ban on all his accounts and related IPs, specially if he does not own up and fix within next 24 hours.
He knows what he is doing (wrong). He is very experienced and extremely good at it (disguise and game). And, he has gotten away with it (time to bring the curtains down). Hence, he might even be beyond "cure him with compassion" (sadly).
I do not have the tools and sufficient knowledge of wikipedia to affect that. Hence, requesting you both to take it forward to permanently fix his "long-term below-the-radar successful-gamer-and-evader repeat-offender" behavior.
Thanks. 202.156.182.84 ( talk) 20:19, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Kautilya3: Popular you are, your talk page is very active these days! I wiki-emailed you some sources from different sides on some topics we touched upon a few months ago. Ms Sarah Welch ( talk) 00:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Armenian Genocide. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Greetings,
It is being planned to organize Wikigraphists Bootcamp in India, please fill out the survey form to help the organizers. Your responses will help organizers understand what level of demand there is for the event (how many people in your community think it is important that the event happens). At the end of the day, the participants will turn out to have knowledge to create drawings, illustrations, diagrams, maps, graphs, bar charts etc. and get to know to how to tune the images to meet the QI and FP criteria. For more information and link to survey form, please visit Talk:Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India). MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:46, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Southern Transitional Council. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Atleast you seem reasonable on the Jammu article just wantes to balance article nothing new was added anyway common sense prevails. 82.132.187.153 ( talk) 22:59, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello sorry to bother you but someone removed the heading and the article link again for no reason citing only "heading not needed" let me argue why it is. Its a historical demographic which no longer exists and merging it to current populations is diluting its historical importance plus the link to the causes of the demographics allows user to switch ti the main article explaining the change just like on the Mirpur page. 82.132.229.123 ( talk) 19:25, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, edit summary for this revert is irrelevant to the sentence where citation was added, please self-undo your revert. Regards -- Omer123hussain ( talk) 13:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi there! I want to know if there is any shortcut to becoming an admin on Wikipedia? ZAthe hero ( talk) 13:27, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jesse Hamilton. Legobot ( talk) 04:33, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Foreign policy of the Donald Trump administration. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Dear Kautilya, I hope that you are doing well. Would you be able to kindly fix Template:Lang-hin? It should be used for Hindustani in the same way that Template:Lang-hi is used for Hindi. I appreciate your time and help! With regards, Anupam Talk 21:35, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Kautilya3,
you reverted my edit in C. Christine Fair giving the reason that the content is "pointless gossip". This is not the case. The investigation for slander does not constitute "pointless gossip". Her diatribe about the German police and the Frankfurt airport, which she calls "Frankfart Hellport" (HuffPo article) might be gossip but the german reporting and my edit aren't.
Regards Haage42 ( talk) 14:16, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Coachella Valley Church. Legobot ( talk) 04:30, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
I only reinstated the indefinite semi-protect after pending changes trail ended. At that time, the consensus was to revert the protection back to the original pre-pending changes status. OhanaUnited Talk page 16:06, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Respected Sir/Mam, In a reply to my edit that was done on 25 January, 2018 you unanimously declared my edits as vandalism but with due respect I want to cite sources of my edit and prove that my edits were correct and Baltistan is a part of Republic Of India under the unlawful occupation of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. At the time of independence and demarcation of international boundary all the regions previously under the erstwhile princely state of Jammu and Kashmir were shown as part of India in accordance to Radcliffe line and the same became part of Instrument of Accession [ [12]] signed by Maharaja Hari Singh and Provisional Government of India. Hence it is a generous request on my part to recognise my edits as authentic and act as a credibility booster for Wikipedia and its editors and readers community. At last as a responsible editor i am not presently making any changes, edits or modifications to the article relating to Baltistan. Waiting eagerly for an eatly reply. Yours Sincerely, — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Truth should prevail ( talk • contribs)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Blue Lives Matter. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I have given an explanation at the Talk page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.127.246.106 ( talk) 00:25, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Legobot ( talk) 04:32, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, Kautilya3 for the heads up. Yaditiva ( talk) 04:56, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
On 18 October 1947 he is 'reported to have' met Maharaja Hari Singh at the request of India's Home Minister Vallabhbhai Patel to persuade the maharaja to accede to India. He was accompanied by the RSS Delhi pracharak Vasantrao Oak and the RSS United Provinces sanghchalak Narendrajit Singh. Although it is believed that the maharaja agreed to the proposal, the accession was not signed until 26 October after the Indo-Pakistani War of 1947.
I am going to wait for a response. You can also ask question if the edit is not appearing good to you. My edits were really simple in my view. --
G (
talk)
06:23, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
References
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Justice Party (South Korea). Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
In 2017 - 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India chapter (WMIN) and user groups will pilot a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program (Code name: Project Tiger) will:
The objective of the program is to provide laptops and internet stipends for existing editors who need support to contribute more actively. 50 basic model Acer Chromebooks and Internet stipends for 100 contributors are available for distribution. Provided resources are the sole property of the beneficiaries and should be used for the betterment of the movement.
If you're an active Wikimedian, and interested to receive support from this project, please apply. It will take around 10 minutes of your time, and will ask descriptive questions about your contribution to Indic Wikimedia projects.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 08:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Nizam of Hyderabad. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.-- Omer123hussain ( talk) 12:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
This is not a WP:HISTRS; do not use it; also do not modify sourced content with WP:OR.Have you looked at the policy pages cited there and understood what the issues are?
I m warning you last time.Who are you to decide whether the sources are fake or not?And you cannot call a reputed press website fake.Consider this as a last threat from my side. Jainallotrope ( talk) 13:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Nizam of Hyderabad. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.-- Omer123hussain ( talk) 12:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
This is not a WP:HISTRS; do not use it; also do not modify sourced content with WP:OR.Have you looked at the policy pages cited there and understood what the issues are?
I m warning you last time.Who are you to decide whether the sources are fake or not?And you cannot call a reputed press website fake.Consider this as a last threat from my side. Jainallotrope ( talk) 13:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The National Memo. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your reply. You are welcome to restore/replace the material you find helpful. I hope this helps. With regards, Anupam Talk 06:35, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Trump–Russia dossier allegations. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dras, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tiger Hill ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
I see you're avoiding that discussion :) But, could you weigh in and help figure out what is appropriate? Thanks!-- regentspark ( comment) 16:29, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Real News Update. Legobot ( talk) 04:33, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
There is no source that is required here; there is a factual error. If for India, there is a mention of "Devanagri" than for China it should be "Mandarine Chinese" and not "Chinese Numerals". This summary page should rightly mention, "Indian Numerals" or "Hindu Numerals". Also, why is India is conjoined with South East Asia in this page. India section should be separate just like the China section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karan Sharma82 ( talk • contribs) 06:32, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
Kashmir conflict.
CambridgeBayWeather,
Uqaqtuq (talk),
Sunasuttuq
03:21, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:B'Tselem. Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Holocaust denial. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Racial views of Donald Trump. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Kautilya. Re your ping on the Kashmir conflict page. I'm not really sure what to do. The discussion is way too complicated to follow for anyone outside the conflict and, as long as editors stick to the letter of the sanctions, it is hard to sanction anyone. Personally, I think if we remove two editors (and perhaps a third, all who shall go unnamed) from the discussion, things will improve. But, as we've seen on AE, it is impossible to get admin action in this area. One option is to do something along the lines of what was done for the lead on Jerusalem (a three "uninvolved editor" panel) but even that seems difficult unless we can get two, clear, competing versions of the text in place. All that said, something needs to be done, I just don't know what that something is. -- regentspark ( comment) 15:44, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:National Rifle Association. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
What a beautiful user page! Thank you for sharing such nice thoughts and historical information with those who come upon it. Randy Kryn ( talk) 13:13, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political appointments by Donald Trump. Legobot ( talk) 04:30, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
In 2017 – 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India Chapter (WMIN) and user groups from India, are piloting a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program will (a) support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and (b) sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.
Phase (a) has been completed, during which active contributors were awarded laptops and internet stipends. Phase (b) will be a contest in which editors will come together and develop a writing contest focused on content gaps. Each month three individual prizes will be awarded to each community based on their contribution for the month. The prizes worth 3,000 INR, 2000 INR, and 1,000 INR, will be awarded to the top contributors for each month. The contest started at March 1, 2018, 0:00, and will end at May 31, 2018, 23:59 (IST). Useful links are as follows:
Looking forward your participation, all the best. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) at 22:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC).
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot ( talk) 04:30, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
I filed a request for response at Wikipeida dispute resolution notice board. I included you also as you were involved in discussioin on Raju/Talk page. I appreciate that you at least thought it was right to change the Raju article by including the information contained in my sources. Sharkslayer87 ( talk) 22:47, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
I've recreated this after dredging through all the available sources. I've a feeling that the usual suspects will try to pull a fast one here (again; it was deleted via AfD the first time because the creator didn't know what they were doing) so I'd appreciate it if you watchlisted this. Vanamonde ( talk) 13:45, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Doug Ford Jr.. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Buddy - It is a good edit you made on Anantnag page - neutral and backed by valid article (better than mine). I am new on Wikipedia (for editing). Hoping more interactions.
Lptx ( talk) 19:53, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Hope to interact and discuss more. :) Lptx ( talk) 19:55, 28 March 2018 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Help expand the article Maureen Wroblewitz. Thanks you very much. 171.248.63.149 ( talk) 10:21, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Abiy Ahmed Ali. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Can you explain this?-- Godric ki Kothri talk to me 14:18, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Regarding Narasimhan et al. (2018 preprint), The Genomic Formation of South and Central Asia, read Tony Joseph, How We, The Indians, Came To Be. The Narasimhan-article will prove be a watershed (big words, I know). Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 13:35, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
However, the hypothesis that an early form of Indo-Aryan was spoken already by the people of the Indus Civilization (or Mature Harappan culture, c. 2600-2000 B.C.) has its supporters, especially in India;[5] they claim that the Aryan languages did not come to the subcontinent from outside but have always been there.[6] In his bold new book, Archaeology and language,[7] Colin Renfrew has given some weight to this view by suggesting that Indo-European speakers may have brought agriculture from Anatolia to Baluchistan already by 6000 B.C.[8] [1]
(For some reason, I never realized that this paper was available online.) -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 18:33, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
References
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Point 5353. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — MBL talk 01:04, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, R.P. Kangle's works have been used as a source to claim about other meanings of the word "dasa" on Slavery in India. However, I'm not really sure about it. Thing is that it's been poorly sourced.
For example i asked to verify source here. Part 3 of his book series on Arthasastra is not called "A critical edition"as claimed in the citation used, Only part 1 is. Part 3 is called "A Study". Even the ISBN no. is of Part I. See ( https://www.abebooks.com/book-search/author/r-p-kangle/)
In another case, Vol 2 and 3 of his book series on Arthshahstra are used, however they both are separate books and as pointed out by me here, no page number has been detailed.
I cannot find these books to verify what is said. But the poor sourcing done on the article raises several doubts. If you can help, I will appreciate it. There seem to be other problems as well, including self-drawn inferences from primary sources, but I will focus on that later. MonsterHunter32 ( talk) 05:10, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Hey, I came across Kautilya5010 ( talk · contribs). In the past, usernames similar to those of long term editors have been used for disruption. This might be just coincidence as well. You might want to keep an eye out. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 15:27, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:CSA Steaua Bucure?ti (football). Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
I have known about Dasas for years. I actually wasn't even looking for Aryan-Dasa conflict, I was only wanted to add various opinions of whether they think dasa denotes a slave or not and how it came to be so.
This is how I stumbled upon Aryan-Dasa conflict in Rig Veda. Now I am not saying they were different races, they may be even the same. This is not about races. But there was a conflict and the Dasas are usually referred to as enemies of Aryas in Rig Veda. Regardless, what I added was how the term Dasa evolved into denoting a slave, it wasn't about racial differences.
You need to let it go and not remove it just because you disagree with it. You can add contrary opinions, but don't remove reliable scholars.
The truth is needed. And the truth is that your actions are not motivated by any real dispute, it is plain censorship. Please don't impede me in maming contributions to Wikipedia. MonsterHunter32 ( talk) 22:22, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
It is okay for you to cast aspersions on sources and my edits and warn me." If you don't think it is ok, you should report it WP:ANI, with evidence. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 23:50, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
They were not the "Dasas of the Rig Veda" and Trautmann isn't saying that they were. Just because English uses the word "slave" for slaves, you can't say the Englishmen enslaved the Slavs. Language is much more complicated than your linear analysis.
Rather, the Rig Veda introduced the term "Dasa" for rival non-Aryan tribes. Some of these tribes were apparently enslaved giving rise to the meaning of "Dasa" as slave. (But this happened in later times, i.e., after 1200 BC). And it happened in Punjab and the Gangetic plains. By the time it happened, there were no "Rigvedic tribes" any more. The Aryans were forming states. The Rigvedic tribes didn't have any states. Try reading this paper to understand the whole context:
Cheers, Kautilya3 ( talk) 01:19, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
The Rigvedic term dasa for enemy tribes came to be employed to mean slave in the later Rigvedic period. Scholars envisage that this was due to the enslavement of some of the enemy tribes by the Aryan settlers. [1] [2]
References
- ^ Sharma, Sudras in Ancient India 1990, pp. 23–24.
- ^ Trautmann, Aryans and British India 1997, p. 224.
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States Government. Legobot ( talk) 04:31, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
There is a wikilink in article Aslam_Khan_(Pakistani_brigadier)#Return_to_Pakistan which is is linked to Rehmatullah Khan. According to the article, Rehmatullah Khan is father of Aslam Khan. But Rehmatullah Khan is redirected to Rehmat Khan which is squash player and has nothing to do with Aslam Khan. Since you are creator of Aslam Khan, and you added this link, what do you want to do with this incorrect link. On the other hand, redirect of Rehmatullah Khan to Rehmat Khan may be incorrect, because no one knows Rehmant Khan as Rehmatullah Khan. One option is to expand Rehmatullah Khan (father of Aslam Khan) article.-- Spasage ( talk) 16:21, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
You are Most Welcome
Fylindfotberserk (
talk)
13:25, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Justice Party (South Korea). Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Holocaust denial. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
I'm working at the CERI SCiences Po and I'm trying to ùodify C Jaffrelot's page at his request. I wrote the page on SPIRE so I am just trying to copy some of this page's elements on wikipedia and actualize the bibliography. Nothing much, so please be kind to make me able to do these modifications that C Jaffrelot who is my boss sked me to do. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by JuchieG ( talk • contribs)
A disruptive editor keeps on adding non-notable quotes on Wikiquote just to promote hatred against non-Hindus like Muslims and Christians and their religions. Even if the quotes are non-notable it doesn't matter to him. Another editor with right-wing views keeps on supporting him. Can you comment on here [22] on Wikiquote's Administrators' noticeboard? Thanks. MonsterHunter32 ( talk) 17:29, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
If the quotes are supported by valid references, why it shouldn't go in? Just because someone has chosen to be ignorant of facts, doesn't mean facts shouldn't be presented. Kautilya2018 ( talk) 17:36, 24 April 2018 (UTC)