![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks! Jusdafax 02:09, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
"Anyone who does not float in this inundation is most condemned. Such a person cannot be delivered for millions of kalpas. PURPORT The kalpa is explained in the Bhagavad-gītā (8.17): sahasra-yuga-paryantam ahar yad brahmaṇo viduḥ. One day of Brahmā is called a kalpa. A yuga, or mahā-yuga, consists of 4,320,000 years, and one thousand such mahā-yugas constitute one kalpa. The author of Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta says that if one does not take advantage of the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement of Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, he cannot be delivered for millions of such kalpas." (Śrī Caitanya Caritāmṛta Antya 3.255) [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.132.184.135 ( talk) 20:02, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
its just this editor Jeff G. is stalking me and trying to get rid of that page because i worked on it alot its a good page i hope they dont delete it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hexenjagd ( talk • contribs) 05:27, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hexenjagd ( talk • contribs) 12:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
The reliable source is here. And on Wookieepedia they tell that the PC version will be developed by Aspyr. 84.86.199.99 ( talk) 14:22, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
I couldn't find where or how to message you, so I thought here would be appropriate. A friend of mine was messing around on my computer at a party I recently had. I assume they are the ones that did the wikipedia vandalism. Sorry about that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.9.15.231 ( talk) 10:30, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello Jusdafax, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Manfred Hamilton to a proposed deletion tag. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow to protect the encyclopedia, and do not fit the page in question. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:52, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
I found plenty of sources. Joe Chill ( talk) 16:19, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of The Red-Headed League (1985 TV Episode), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: The Red-Headed League (TV movie). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 01:30, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give
The Red-Headed League (TV movie) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "
cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the
page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. VernoWhitney ( talk) 01:45, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
...for reverting my user page. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 06:07, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
I appreciate your catching and correcting the vandalism on my Wikipedia page. I am not all that familiar with Wikipedia, and in my attempt to fix what the vandal had done, not realizing that you had already fixed it, I think I attempted to or possibly did undo one of your edits / reversions. I didn't know what I was doing, but the page is fine now. Again--many thanks! --Andy W. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andyw2100 ( talk • contribs) 13:43, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
This is not an encyclopedia. This is a bad geopolitics scrach. You are the fullish man ever. I want corect the fact about Tartaria tablets write by some hungaryan extremist he said that TARTARIA IS IN HUNGARIAN KINGDOM. This is not true and is chipest propaganda. If you are not according to this you are a idiot —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adsignia ( talk • contribs) 17:05, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Since we seem to already have a relationship of "I change something and then you go a head and change it back" could you look over my submission on the topic listed on the Office 2010 discussion page to review what I have said, thanks.
You may delete this after this has been read. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.71.46.111 ( talk) 23:23, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
When you tag articles as copyright violations, you should put the url in too as the CorenSearchBot tag is not always correct or complete. VernoWhitney ( talk) 17:36, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
for reverting that edit to WikiProject Bedfordshire, it is much appreciated. Thanks, Acather96 ( talk) 09:03, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia say it is free, but friend, this is terrorism because it will not let me write what I researched on their own sources (Wikipedia). Says it is not constructive for terrorists (liars and thieves) but for the truth, they want to silence him, but can not. Friends may buy to Zapatero and other politicians sold, but not the population as Spain said the journalist that they threw the shoe and others who have left them with an outstretched hand, and their soldiers drugged, drunken gay and resigned nationality, because they do not want them. I'm impartial, so I decided to investigate and help supplement the information you wrote on this subject in which recognize that even before the 50's this kind of music (rock) was already known, or was not hurt in the only Christian country called Russia (former USSR) where everything we know (worldwide) that they are the only intelligent, capable of dominating the world with their inventions and technology, we gain with her peacefully (not terrorist like you) good service and who would not hurt hurt. (And as the Mexicans say: "GREEN GO", or Saudi "USA GO TO HELL" or the Nicaraguan "GRINGO FILIBUSTERS" or as we say (USA) why they want to separate religion from state if our dollar says "in God we trust" and we do not want the Amero? and as I say, I should tell the truth, and while, say alive, even against their will.) . I hope to correct the incomplete information 50'sy above to read and research and be mature enough to accept the facts as they are obliged to inform and not to be subservient, being a follower of the group, overriding the "freedom" of Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vasnetsov y SirinGa ( talk • contribs) 09:33, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Please stop you of lying and manipulating information by people like you, all of us to get GRINGO´S and tell us thieves and liars, all his fault, WHERE IS THE FREEDOM OF WIKIPEDIA? I just want to express the truth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vasnetsov y SirinGa ( talk • contribs) 09:48, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
"Extraction of Wikipedia? It is noted that almost do not know, because one language to another varies the information and English is very poor. You be careful and do not threaten me. It is the fourth time that I warn you that I only want the truth. I would appreciate if you know Russian to teach me, to know what they think of the robberies that make them (and the Germans with beer or Italian with pizza, and so on). TERRORISTS THREATEN ONLY. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vasnetsov y SirinGa ( talk • contribs) 10:21, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
TERRORISTS THREATEN ONLY. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Vasnetsov y SirinGa (
talk •
contribs)
10:23, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
I am learning a lot just by reading your talk page regularly, but mostly I am laughing out loud at your temperate responses to the nonsense such as what I just read above. Poor misunderstood terrorist. I feel for you. Perhaps his wisdom will eventually get through to you? :D MichaelWestbrook ( talk) 12:58, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Define how a source currently unattributed as all other material descriptions constitutes vandalism. Please refrain from removing this edit until you can suitably show that this material is not used to created double ended dildos. ref. device #24: bondage. SECRET #33: Fetish Art and Fashion —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.223.164.211 ( talk) 03:33, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Jusdafax, I call on you now for jus da fax, please. There is a new thread discussing a requested rename here at the oil spill talk page: Talk:Deepwater_Horizon_oil_spill#Survey ... Please add either your support or opposition there, as I value your previous contribution in an archived thread regarding other rename requests. Thankyou kindly, terrorist :D MichaelWestbrook ( talk) 10:50, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
You might like this: User:JzG/And the band played on... Guy ( Help!) 12:53, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your contribution to my Rfa. I have made a comment about it at User talk:JamesBWatson#Your Request for Adminship which you are, of course, very welcome to read if you wish to. JamesBWatson ( talk) 14:46, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your help. But now I have a BIG problem... The website where I found a maximum of the information deleted Aoi's page (since his record company announced about his problem, it's harder to find old information on him).
I also tried to search other reliable source for the events but there is none...
I only find it in blogs. I saw that it's not a reliable source and for the other part of the information they were on the Official Website...
I tried to do something better on the biography but I'm not sure if it's good... Seikyo(Seven) 11:10 (GMT+1), 22 June 2010 —Preceding undated comment added 09:16, 22 June 2010 (UTC).
It is my first article in Wikipedia English. I first did one on Aoi in Wikipedia France (with less information) then translated it in English and put it in Wikipedia English but it was shortly deleted... I didn't had the time to ask what was not good... Then I thought I could put the best biography of Aoi I did on Wikipedia but... I don't have much time and I don't know where I have to put the reliable source or where put link. I thought there would be other fan of Aoi in wikipedia english who could help me but I feel really alone now...
About the magazine, I buyed one wich had a page on Aoi. It's a French magazine. But most of the information in the biography were on Visunavi... Correction, someone send me a like of Visunavi, looks like Aoi's still on it. But since I used this website for 90% of the information there are in Aoi's biography, what can I do? Do I have to write everywhere the source?
I can search in Europe for the European Event, I think I'll find it easily but in Japan it's harder... I can search in newspaper but I won't be able to find magazine which talk about Aoi... Also, Aoi's record company deleted lots of old information about him so it's harder to find what I need.
But for the time being the greatest help you could give me is to tell me what can I do with the "red links" and where do I put the source thing? Also what is good to put and what is not good? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seikyo(Seven) ( talk • contribs) 16:09, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Like I said I don't have lot of time but if I understand well I don't have to put links about the lives places? (Also, yes English is not my first language.)
But I think I'll still let a link on the event names which are famous in Europe (like the Japantag or the JAPAN EXPO). About the source I'll see in other Japanese singer biography how it's done...
Ah no... I just watched INORAN's biography and there are no source links... Do I have to create the pages which doesn't exist? I don't know a lot on the JAPAN EXPO even though I went to all the JAPAN EXPO which exist in France (JAPAN EXPO, JAPAN EXPO Sud, Chibi JAPAN EXPO). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seikyo(Seven) ( talk • contribs) 17:44, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Okay thank you, I saw the page of another band... I think: 1. I abandon 2. I rewrite all the article using another Artist's page 3.I put source where I can so that I won't have problem.
I think I'll do in this order if 3 don't work it's 2 and if 2 don't works then 1...
I don't want to use all of my free time to do that even if it's usefull for Aoi. Because I made this article for him, I promote him everywhere I can on internet but Wikipedia is really the hardest place to let an artist be known...-- Seikyo(Seven) ( talk) 18:35, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Many thanks for that. I've replied on my talk page (in the hope that the two editors see it: at least one of them will, I suspect). The executive summary is: agree absolutely. The pair of 'em need to smarten up, and fast. I'm not going to extend protection indefinitely, not when the easier option is to block to editors for WP:CIVILity issues. TFOWR 10:18, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. I've reverted the speedy, as the article asserts his notability as an author. Might be a candidate for AFD, but I'll try to hunt for some refs online. Thanks, Empty Buffer ( talk) 10:11, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. [2] The discussion is about the topic Seeking admin assistance for disruptive editor. [3]. Thank you. Eurytemora ( talk) 10:56, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
TFOWR 15:26, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello Mr.Jusdafax, I see no reason Further reading in Zac Efron article that you can delete it, thanks.-- 87.109.192.219 ( talk) 10:59, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for the star and the kind words. Herostratus ( talk) 03:21, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
My mistake, I didn't know I was "vandalizing." I was merely correcting information. My suggestion is please research and fix the page, it's misleading when you have wrong information listed. The listed producer is wrong. It's not Matt Sepanic, it's Chris "Zeuss" Harris. Even the band's page contradicts what's listed on the album page, and the info on the band's page is correct. Look it up, and YOU can edit it yourself. mytwin 03:46, 3 July 2010
I'm kinda new, my bad. mytwin 03:51, 3 July 2010
Dear Jusdafax,
I represent Doug Adams, the author of the liner notes to The Lord of the Rings: The Complete Recordings as well as the upcoming book The Music of the Lord of the Rings Films. There are several instances of incorrect information that appear on this page, but every time I update them, they are reverted back to their original state. I assure you that I am not a vandal trying to destroy this page, the author and I are very close, and I am trying to fix the incorrect information.
Thank you,
Middle-D-Inc —Preceding unsigned comment added by Middle-D-Inc ( talk • contribs) 04:54, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar |
Thank you for all the vandal-fighting you've done on here. Much appreciated! MarmadukePercy ( talk) 06:14, 3 July 2010 (UTC) |
Many thanks, and I am much obliged for your good opinion! Best wishes, Jusdafax 07:04, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The Purple Star | |
I noticed your userpage was vandalized over 200 times, so I thought I would give you this Zonafan39 ( talk) 07:35, 4 July 2010 (UTC) |
May I say I appreciate your gift of a barnstar as well. One can get compassion fatigue and burnout doing this, and these expressions of appreciation mean a lot to me. Best wishes, today and every day! Jusdafax 08:02, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
-- φ
OnePt618
Talk φ has given you a
pie! Pies promote the kind of hearty eating that puts a smile on your face and a sustaining meal in your stomach. Hopefully this pie has made your day better. Spread the goodness by giving someone else a pie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy eating! Spread the goodness of pie by adding {{ subst:Wikipie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
|
Well done, and cheers!-- φ OnePt618 Talk φ 07:47, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Do you have a reference that could be added for Crill's naming rationale? Otherwise the new bracketed text looks too speculative. AllyD ( talk) 08:12, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
This was a poor edit. Reverting all the content using a script like this while a speedy tag is on the article misleadingly gives the impression of there being no content; I mistakenly speedied it as 'no context' before my error was pointed out. The article creator did provide a source (a Soapcentral recap), and you removed far more than just "dubious unsourced content", such as the actress, infobox, and times of appearances, indeed you basically blanked the whole article. Actually the content all looks perfectly verifiable to me from a look through Google News archives. Please don't bite the newbies. I hope this isn't your usual approach to dealing with new articles and editors. Fences& Windows 16:24, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
...for reverting vandalism on my user page! Greetings from Amsterdam, Kwiki ( talk) 23:02, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
-- White Shadows There goes another day 17:22, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Was sorry to see you went along with the speedy Fuster deletion rockin guy. Other more experienced editors (I know, "how can that be with 45,000 contributions?!) would have given us time to get additional references, especially since Doc Fuster agreed to add GNU copyright free language to his sites. EENG was hostile from day one, and might have something against Fuster we are missing. We don't know the guy at all, just saw a review about him getting an award, and figured he's notable. Needless to say he will no longer give permission for anything, given EENG's style (calling his accomplishments "fawning" on the talk page!? Cripes, this is the guy who DISCOVERED memory cells, and there are numerous "orange" references to him on Wiki that now still won't go to a page thanks to EENG). After spending hours doing links in that article and communicating with the principal, we'll revert to being an EENG type editor, throwing stones, dispensing templates, but adding no value unless invited by another editor or administrator with more clout that EENG types, who can provide air cover for our work. Learned a valuable lesson here: don't contribute and waste a bunch of work and time unless you've got admins to go to battle for you, and give enough time to complete the research. We would have been happy to work with EENG, but he made it clear from edit one that he wanted only a role of telling us what to do, not adding anything himself! No tanks to dat. Good stuff on the rock and roll work, maybe you can help with our Loy article? Phoenixthebird ( talk) 19:22, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
PS: I'll need to contact Etrigan on Loy, I've now noticed that EENG is targeting ALL our articles, and vandalizing and adding templates to all of them, as a vendetta. Can any of you guys discipline this character? Raining on a newbie is one thing, specifically targeting work as a vendetta has to be against some rule since there are so many here!!! Phoenixthebird ( talk) 19:31, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
On User talk:124.150.49.182 you added a template message. I'm currently getting used to correctly applying these when reverting edits. Could you please tell me which template you used? Thanks. Mltinus ( talk) 14:02, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
First time it's been vandalized, apparently... GregorB ( talk) 20:36, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Can you say me, what is wrong which this ? -- DC Fan 5 ( talk) 20:29, 13 July 2010 (UTC) Nothing, it seems, as I misunderstood your intent. Sorry about that. I have noted this at the AIV page where you also commented earlier. Jusdafax 20:42, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Our friend from CT (aka '75' aka Techwriter2B aka ....) is back. Thought you might find the AN/I thread of interest [4]. Best Eurytemora ( talk) 03:37, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Cybercobra has given you a
cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
![]() |
The Special Barnstar | |
For going above and beyond on ANI, alerting authorities and recognizing that there are real lives behind all of these user names. Smashville talk 15:10, 14 July 2010 (UTC) |
Many thanks! This was the first time I've phoned the cops about something from the encyclopedia, but the officer was friendly, interested, and even looked to see the "evidence" for himself, with a little prompting from me on how to find the history. I appreciate the barnstar; of course, here's hoping there is no actual attack and they can find this kid and scare some sense into him. Jusdafax 15:38, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The Real Life Barnstar | |
For what is likely the single most important thing you will ever do on Wikipedia. Toddst1 ( talk) 16:34, 14 July 2010 (UTC) |
p.s. You are now entitled to display this. Toddst1 ( talk) 16:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Not at all -- I'm glad we have this kind of oversight operating. It improves all the work that happens here! Civilizeme ( talk) 19:50, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Many thanks for removing the vandalism on my page Vrenator ( talk) 15:20, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Jusdafax,
Why are you attempting to delete entire sections of the page I have worked hard to edit and expand for Christ Episcopal Church? I believe that the information I have added to the page is entirely referenced and accurate. Please let me know what is inappropriate about the current version of the page.
Thanks!
Mbalulescu ( talk) 19:31, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
I will be sure to provide a summary for my edits. Thank you for your understanding, and I appreciate that I did not get a warning :)
Mbalulescu ( talk) 21:40, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
I appreciate the note. If I can help in any way ask anytime. Good fortunes to you! Jusdafax 19:38, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Don't take this as vandalism - I only want to talk to you. "The subject of ICP cards has been ranked as #2 on the "things that no one gives a shit about" list, with prunes being #1" was something that was passed on to me. I feel that any facts like these should be communicated. Please inform of a better way to communicate this info - I do not want to be banned from wikipedia.
Hello, I deleted the tag from the article on "Andre DeJuan", but I did not create the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redeyewatchman ( talk • contribs) 21:40, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello. I regret to have to inform you that after just three days of silence that he/she is back and as bad as ever. (Please see [6], [7], [8], [9], and [10].) I started the last AN/I case ( [11]) and Eurytemora the one in June ( [12]). I'm wondering if you would be willing to start a third as I am probably too much out front on this and it may be more effective if the next one was started by a third editor. I will, of course, be happy to contribute to the discussion in my usual well documented way. WP really needs to be rid of this troublemaker for good. Many thanks!!! Centpacrr ( talk) 19:27, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Outstanding thought... further research is needed on this one! Jusdafax 03:06, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
And if I can help in some way, let me know. Jusdafax 17:25, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
I am unfamiliar with the "LTA list" and don't know where to find it. Could one of you provide a link? Thanks. Jusdafax 05:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting the vandalism from my talk page. (Sorry if this was a bit late.) — MC10 ( T• C• GB• L) 19:45, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
I've started a discussion on adding the subject as question #4 at the RfA talk page. I'm bad at wordsmithing, so if you have some phrasing you think would be good could you add it there? Thanks again for the barnstar! Hobit ( talk) 02:07, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
I have revoked your rollback until this situation is dealt with. It should have been fairly clear that the editor, who is likely the subject of the article, was acting in good faith. Definitely not a case for rollback + warn. NW ( Talk) 03:16, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Dear Mr. Jusdafax,
Thanks for protecting this page from vandalism. I am a minor editor and lacking of knowledge of the security issue / protection of wiki articles. This page is being vandalized frequently by some unknowns. would you please take necessary steps.
Thank you. - Mmh-duke ( talk) 16:46, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. :) Mmh-duke ( talk) 05:26, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
L. Martin Griffin, Jr. at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Nsk92 (
talk)
17:49, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
-- Stepheng3 ( talk) 19:23, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
By the way, I assume you're aware of Wikipedia:Red link. If not, you might want to review it.-- Stepheng3 ( talk) 21:16, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
I just saw what you said at Chris' talk, and I want to thank you for the kind words—and right back at you too! -- Tryptofish ( talk) 20:10, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Howdy. In a recent RfA I noticed you commented that a nominee had made no edits to AIV. Is there a tool/link that you know of that will show how many edits I've made there?-- Rockfang ( talk) 23:00, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
He vandalizes again!!!!!! 77.233.70.192 ( talk) 11:18, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() | On August 5, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article L. Martin Griffin, Jr., which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 06:02, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Are you Egyptian? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Capolinho ( talk • contribs) 21:40, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
I have been trying to deal with this vandal on Waldemeer Park. Thanks for your efforts! T3h 1337 b0y 21:59, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Judas quick question idont understand what is vandilism on here im new today please help answer on my page thank u very much i didt know what that text was is it possible to add you friend —Preceding unsigned comment added by MetalShark ( talk • contribs) 22:05, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
how do i make my page have stuff like that and how u get pic
have you read my user page MetalShark ( talk) 00:47, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
I have, and you are very kind. By the way I'm actually called Jusdafax like it was Juss-da-fax or even Just-the-facts. Seemed like a good name for a Wikipedian. It actually comes from Just the facts, ma'am, supposedly said by Joe Friday on the super old Dragnet TV show. Cheers! Jusdafax 00:54, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
For helping to revert that annoying ip's edits to the tennis players' pages :) - BlagoCorzine2016 ( talk) 04:05, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi editing IanMccreas page trying to put in a relevant article about him being in a no pope here page on FB but it was removed,is it against your rules?thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hollowpoint71 ( talk • contribs) 12:19, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for helping me on the [Projecto Moda] page! Still the page is getting vandalized i guess. Someone keeps changing things. Is it possible to block someone or whatever? Once again thenks for helping me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monoculo ( talk • contribs) 23:58, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() | On 12 August 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Colombia–Venezuela relations, which you nominated and substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
-- Courcelles 06:41, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Hooray! Many thanks, but I had some pretty good help, so thanks to them too. This is another first for me, and I find I like ITN. Jusdafax 06:49, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Done - By my count you got 1,300 characters. Standing by for your reaction. 8D
Jusdafax
09:22, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
are u online im metalsharks friend my name is metalshark02 i added u 2 my watchlist —Preceding unsigned comment added by Metalshark02 ( talk • contribs) 22:57, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Jusdafax. I see at User talk:KyleAraujo you helped an editor to get an article deleted by inviting the author to blank the page, and then tagging it as author blanked. This did the job OK, but I thought I would mention that you could have achieved the same effect more easily by simply adding {{ db-author}} to the article, once the author has requested deletion, without asking them to blank it first. It also helps to say (either in an edit summary or on the article's talk page) where the author's request is, if it isn't somewhere obvious. JamesBWatson ( talk) 09:41, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
FYI, the registered user user:Premiermaple has deleted the majority of the content in the semi-protected entry you helped with yesterday - you may not have noticed. I've restored it again. Is there something we can do about this user? -- C Hawke ( talk) 07:56, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for keeping that IP user from vandalizing the page. Hopefully he'll stop soon.
A point of fact: I'm not sure if the chapter at Yeshiva is active or not. Will look into it. -- Mblumber ( talk) 15:24, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello, your nomination of Kent Island (California) at DYK has been reviewed and comments provided. -- NortyNort (Holla) 10:42, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Hey, I left you a question there. I've semi'd the article for a week in the meantime, so there's no rush, I'd just like to hear your thoughts since, imo, the only reason you can;t do it yourself is a technicality! ;) Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:02, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Our friend from CT ( Techwriter2B) is back and causing more trouble, this time in ANI here. I would appreciate your comments and/or assistance there. Thanks. Centpacrr ( talk) 21:23, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() | On 18 August 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 17 August 2010 Baghdad bombing, which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
-- tariqabjotu 00:15, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() | On 18 August 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kent Island (California), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Courcelles 18:03, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Many thanks! Jusdafax 18:41, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Very nice start and I hope you don't mind my fiddling. Sorry about the edit conflicts - I am out of it for now, so it's all yours again! Thanks and best wishes DBaK ( talk) 09:12, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
I just wanted to send you a very quick message to thank you for creating the Undershaw page. I am not a very experienced Wikipedian but I will aim to develop the page over the forthcoming weeks. I have also asked for further assistance via a blog on my website at 'bfronline.biz'. Again, many many thanks, prspiring. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prspiring ( talk • contribs) 21:22, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Many thanks. I will do my very best to learn the conventions and protocols. Best wishes. Prspiring ( talk) 21:55, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Jusdafax, I see you are very quick at reverting vandalism. I appreciate your speedy restoration of the talk page section I posted on Talk:Epimetheus_Society. Keep up the good work. -- WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk) 16:34, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
"Delete - What a mess. " [16] Delete? So you are also against Hare Krishna portal??? You must be either fool or rascal. Yes, this page is still messy, but just because there are so many materialists and atheists here all around, and even having their atheism portal on this wikipedia, so why there should be no Hare Krishna portal??? So if you say - delete Hare Krishna portal, I say then - delete your atheism portal, then I it may be ok. You may leave there buddhism, impersonalism, but all those not authoritative stuff is not to be there. Buddha is avatara of Vishnu. And also Shankaracarya is Shiva, who also being biggest impersonalist, also accepted Krishna, Narayana to be Supreme Personality of Godhead and necessity to worship Him. But that atheism portal in present form has no right to exist. Buddha came to stop atheism - ok, but all those garbage - take that away. I mean impersonalist, so-called followers of Shankaracarya they are rascals, because they do not accept Krishna, Supreme Personality of Godhead, and worship only His impersonal Brahmajyoti rays of His transcendental body. So anyway, wikipedia now disinforms very much, so I challenge wikipedia atheim portal with this Hare Krishna portal. Alternatively, if you insist that Hare Krishna portal is to be not on wikipedia, than I have all the rights to insists that atheism portal to be removed. Just as atheists claim that there is no God, so we can say that they are offenders. And they must be punished. So this punishment for them - first of all - removal of atheism portal. Next we would see. Hare Krishna. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.133.117.5 ( talk) 20:05, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your support in my RfA. Keeping Wikipedia clean sounds like a great goal to pursue! Cheers, Nikkimaria ( talk) 14:51, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Several years ago I read a very detailed bio of Doyle that included lots of details about Undershaw. It was a pretty good bood. I wish I could remember the name. You are most welcome and congrats on the fine article. Dincher ( talk) 00:25, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Just for future reference, you might want to see what I did here. WP:NAMEDREFS makes pages easier to read in edit mode, reduces the number of footnotes, and makes citation templates easier to fill out completely because it only has to be done once. One more support and I'll put it on the main page. Courcelles 08:04, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() | On 26 August 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 25 August 2010 Iraq bombings, which you substantially updated and recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
-- tariqabjotu 10:32, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! I think we (several other editors were substantially involved) wrote a reasonably good article there, and I appreciate the ITN exposure. Jusdafax 10:37, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() | On 29 August 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bolinas Ridge, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 12:02, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Many thanks! Jusdafax 12:05, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() | On 30 August 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Undershaw, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 06:02, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
And again, many thanks!
Re: Sintal Agriculture PLC. Please read what the PROD template says. It can be removed at any time by anyone. If it is removed, you cannot replace it.
If you don't believe that the article is a candidate for speedy deletion, your next step is to nominate it for deletion through AfD. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 15:15, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
User 122.58.191.195 has made a couple of dozen edits to the same page I am working on, for now, mostly to improve readability and to remove attribution problems, now and in the future. I plan to look for legitimate sources when the basic readability of the page is improved. From his edit history it's obvious he has an interest in New Zealand (and may live there) but the volume of minor edits/undos is kind of astonishing.
I don't want to get into an edit war with someone but feel my command of the King's English is better than his, and that my effort to improve the basic readability of an article that needs a tremendous amount of work (including verifiable sources) should not be in vain. One thing that irritates me his addition of links that only look like links. They are only text attributions with no way to check the source.
Could you please have a look at the edit history of
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Invasion_of_Waikato&action=history
and let me know what you think? I'd rather not escalate this, but I feel someone is taking advantage of the system to promote his own beliefs, style, and way of saying things, to the detriment of what I feel could be a good wiki article about the early years of a well-considered nation.
I'm asking you because you have proven to be fair with your judgements in the past (including with me), and are likely to recommend a reasonable course of action. One person (unsigned, doh, but still added to its own section on my talk page) actually complimented me on the improvements, so I figure there have to be at least two people who like what I've done.
Cheers, Kadathdreamques ( talk) 01:05, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
sorry about the quick add, but the user noted above has already been admonished for poor editing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:122.58.191.195&action=history
Kadathdreamques ( talk) 01:14, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
No it's not resolved, but it's also not an explosive issue at this time. I suspect that 122.58.191.195 will be busy editing while I am asleep. My last edit removed some improperly attributed edits by him, with the note that previous senior editors have already warned him about adding original unattributed material (escalated to level 3). Basically I don't want to waste my time improving an article if someone is determined to keep downgrading it with poorly edited posts and impossible to verify sources.
I'm not sure how WIki deals with these kinds of edits. It's not vandalism per se, but it seems to be motivated by a personal agenda. Kadathdreamques ( talk) 02:59, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Hey, I noticed that you had recently edited the Iraq bombing attack article, and I hoped that you could help out on another collaborative community edited project.
I run quippd, a collaboratively edited social news site, which mixes elements of Wikis, social networking, and social news sites. You can get some more information about what we are doing at: http://quippd.com/about/intro
Basically, we want to get good coverage on news stories, collaboratively edited, like Wikipedia. We are trying to take the ideas of WikiFactCheck -- to make news less biased and speedier (unlike something like Wikinews). By combining social elements to the project, we hope to bring the benefits of wiki enabled fact checking and npov ideas to the masses.
I hope you check us out -- and feel free to contact me with any questions, comments, or concerns.
-- Yoasif ( talk) 03:55, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
I saw your comment that you want to speak in defense of HJ Mitchell. I'm just trying to figure out what that means. Are you saying that you think it was a good block and within policy? Or are you just saying that you think HJ Mitchell is a swell guy anyway?-- Cube lurker ( talk) 22:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks! Jusdafax 02:09, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
"Anyone who does not float in this inundation is most condemned. Such a person cannot be delivered for millions of kalpas. PURPORT The kalpa is explained in the Bhagavad-gītā (8.17): sahasra-yuga-paryantam ahar yad brahmaṇo viduḥ. One day of Brahmā is called a kalpa. A yuga, or mahā-yuga, consists of 4,320,000 years, and one thousand such mahā-yugas constitute one kalpa. The author of Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta says that if one does not take advantage of the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement of Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, he cannot be delivered for millions of such kalpas." (Śrī Caitanya Caritāmṛta Antya 3.255) [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.132.184.135 ( talk) 20:02, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
its just this editor Jeff G. is stalking me and trying to get rid of that page because i worked on it alot its a good page i hope they dont delete it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hexenjagd ( talk • contribs) 05:27, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hexenjagd ( talk • contribs) 12:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
The reliable source is here. And on Wookieepedia they tell that the PC version will be developed by Aspyr. 84.86.199.99 ( talk) 14:22, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
I couldn't find where or how to message you, so I thought here would be appropriate. A friend of mine was messing around on my computer at a party I recently had. I assume they are the ones that did the wikipedia vandalism. Sorry about that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.9.15.231 ( talk) 10:30, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello Jusdafax, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Manfred Hamilton to a proposed deletion tag. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow to protect the encyclopedia, and do not fit the page in question. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:52, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
I found plenty of sources. Joe Chill ( talk) 16:19, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of The Red-Headed League (1985 TV Episode), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: The Red-Headed League (TV movie). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 01:30, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give
The Red-Headed League (TV movie) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "
cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the
page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. VernoWhitney ( talk) 01:45, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
...for reverting my user page. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 06:07, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
I appreciate your catching and correcting the vandalism on my Wikipedia page. I am not all that familiar with Wikipedia, and in my attempt to fix what the vandal had done, not realizing that you had already fixed it, I think I attempted to or possibly did undo one of your edits / reversions. I didn't know what I was doing, but the page is fine now. Again--many thanks! --Andy W. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andyw2100 ( talk • contribs) 13:43, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
This is not an encyclopedia. This is a bad geopolitics scrach. You are the fullish man ever. I want corect the fact about Tartaria tablets write by some hungaryan extremist he said that TARTARIA IS IN HUNGARIAN KINGDOM. This is not true and is chipest propaganda. If you are not according to this you are a idiot —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adsignia ( talk • contribs) 17:05, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Since we seem to already have a relationship of "I change something and then you go a head and change it back" could you look over my submission on the topic listed on the Office 2010 discussion page to review what I have said, thanks.
You may delete this after this has been read. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.71.46.111 ( talk) 23:23, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
When you tag articles as copyright violations, you should put the url in too as the CorenSearchBot tag is not always correct or complete. VernoWhitney ( talk) 17:36, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
for reverting that edit to WikiProject Bedfordshire, it is much appreciated. Thanks, Acather96 ( talk) 09:03, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia say it is free, but friend, this is terrorism because it will not let me write what I researched on their own sources (Wikipedia). Says it is not constructive for terrorists (liars and thieves) but for the truth, they want to silence him, but can not. Friends may buy to Zapatero and other politicians sold, but not the population as Spain said the journalist that they threw the shoe and others who have left them with an outstretched hand, and their soldiers drugged, drunken gay and resigned nationality, because they do not want them. I'm impartial, so I decided to investigate and help supplement the information you wrote on this subject in which recognize that even before the 50's this kind of music (rock) was already known, or was not hurt in the only Christian country called Russia (former USSR) where everything we know (worldwide) that they are the only intelligent, capable of dominating the world with their inventions and technology, we gain with her peacefully (not terrorist like you) good service and who would not hurt hurt. (And as the Mexicans say: "GREEN GO", or Saudi "USA GO TO HELL" or the Nicaraguan "GRINGO FILIBUSTERS" or as we say (USA) why they want to separate religion from state if our dollar says "in God we trust" and we do not want the Amero? and as I say, I should tell the truth, and while, say alive, even against their will.) . I hope to correct the incomplete information 50'sy above to read and research and be mature enough to accept the facts as they are obliged to inform and not to be subservient, being a follower of the group, overriding the "freedom" of Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vasnetsov y SirinGa ( talk • contribs) 09:33, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Please stop you of lying and manipulating information by people like you, all of us to get GRINGO´S and tell us thieves and liars, all his fault, WHERE IS THE FREEDOM OF WIKIPEDIA? I just want to express the truth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vasnetsov y SirinGa ( talk • contribs) 09:48, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
"Extraction of Wikipedia? It is noted that almost do not know, because one language to another varies the information and English is very poor. You be careful and do not threaten me. It is the fourth time that I warn you that I only want the truth. I would appreciate if you know Russian to teach me, to know what they think of the robberies that make them (and the Germans with beer or Italian with pizza, and so on). TERRORISTS THREATEN ONLY. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vasnetsov y SirinGa ( talk • contribs) 10:21, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
TERRORISTS THREATEN ONLY. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Vasnetsov y SirinGa (
talk •
contribs)
10:23, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
I am learning a lot just by reading your talk page regularly, but mostly I am laughing out loud at your temperate responses to the nonsense such as what I just read above. Poor misunderstood terrorist. I feel for you. Perhaps his wisdom will eventually get through to you? :D MichaelWestbrook ( talk) 12:58, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Define how a source currently unattributed as all other material descriptions constitutes vandalism. Please refrain from removing this edit until you can suitably show that this material is not used to created double ended dildos. ref. device #24: bondage. SECRET #33: Fetish Art and Fashion —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.223.164.211 ( talk) 03:33, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Jusdafax, I call on you now for jus da fax, please. There is a new thread discussing a requested rename here at the oil spill talk page: Talk:Deepwater_Horizon_oil_spill#Survey ... Please add either your support or opposition there, as I value your previous contribution in an archived thread regarding other rename requests. Thankyou kindly, terrorist :D MichaelWestbrook ( talk) 10:50, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
You might like this: User:JzG/And the band played on... Guy ( Help!) 12:53, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your contribution to my Rfa. I have made a comment about it at User talk:JamesBWatson#Your Request for Adminship which you are, of course, very welcome to read if you wish to. JamesBWatson ( talk) 14:46, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your help. But now I have a BIG problem... The website where I found a maximum of the information deleted Aoi's page (since his record company announced about his problem, it's harder to find old information on him).
I also tried to search other reliable source for the events but there is none...
I only find it in blogs. I saw that it's not a reliable source and for the other part of the information they were on the Official Website...
I tried to do something better on the biography but I'm not sure if it's good... Seikyo(Seven) 11:10 (GMT+1), 22 June 2010 —Preceding undated comment added 09:16, 22 June 2010 (UTC).
It is my first article in Wikipedia English. I first did one on Aoi in Wikipedia France (with less information) then translated it in English and put it in Wikipedia English but it was shortly deleted... I didn't had the time to ask what was not good... Then I thought I could put the best biography of Aoi I did on Wikipedia but... I don't have much time and I don't know where I have to put the reliable source or where put link. I thought there would be other fan of Aoi in wikipedia english who could help me but I feel really alone now...
About the magazine, I buyed one wich had a page on Aoi. It's a French magazine. But most of the information in the biography were on Visunavi... Correction, someone send me a like of Visunavi, looks like Aoi's still on it. But since I used this website for 90% of the information there are in Aoi's biography, what can I do? Do I have to write everywhere the source?
I can search in Europe for the European Event, I think I'll find it easily but in Japan it's harder... I can search in newspaper but I won't be able to find magazine which talk about Aoi... Also, Aoi's record company deleted lots of old information about him so it's harder to find what I need.
But for the time being the greatest help you could give me is to tell me what can I do with the "red links" and where do I put the source thing? Also what is good to put and what is not good? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seikyo(Seven) ( talk • contribs) 16:09, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Like I said I don't have lot of time but if I understand well I don't have to put links about the lives places? (Also, yes English is not my first language.)
But I think I'll still let a link on the event names which are famous in Europe (like the Japantag or the JAPAN EXPO). About the source I'll see in other Japanese singer biography how it's done...
Ah no... I just watched INORAN's biography and there are no source links... Do I have to create the pages which doesn't exist? I don't know a lot on the JAPAN EXPO even though I went to all the JAPAN EXPO which exist in France (JAPAN EXPO, JAPAN EXPO Sud, Chibi JAPAN EXPO). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seikyo(Seven) ( talk • contribs) 17:44, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Okay thank you, I saw the page of another band... I think: 1. I abandon 2. I rewrite all the article using another Artist's page 3.I put source where I can so that I won't have problem.
I think I'll do in this order if 3 don't work it's 2 and if 2 don't works then 1...
I don't want to use all of my free time to do that even if it's usefull for Aoi. Because I made this article for him, I promote him everywhere I can on internet but Wikipedia is really the hardest place to let an artist be known...-- Seikyo(Seven) ( talk) 18:35, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Many thanks for that. I've replied on my talk page (in the hope that the two editors see it: at least one of them will, I suspect). The executive summary is: agree absolutely. The pair of 'em need to smarten up, and fast. I'm not going to extend protection indefinitely, not when the easier option is to block to editors for WP:CIVILity issues. TFOWR 10:18, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. I've reverted the speedy, as the article asserts his notability as an author. Might be a candidate for AFD, but I'll try to hunt for some refs online. Thanks, Empty Buffer ( talk) 10:11, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. [2] The discussion is about the topic Seeking admin assistance for disruptive editor. [3]. Thank you. Eurytemora ( talk) 10:56, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
TFOWR 15:26, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello Mr.Jusdafax, I see no reason Further reading in Zac Efron article that you can delete it, thanks.-- 87.109.192.219 ( talk) 10:59, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for the star and the kind words. Herostratus ( talk) 03:21, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
My mistake, I didn't know I was "vandalizing." I was merely correcting information. My suggestion is please research and fix the page, it's misleading when you have wrong information listed. The listed producer is wrong. It's not Matt Sepanic, it's Chris "Zeuss" Harris. Even the band's page contradicts what's listed on the album page, and the info on the band's page is correct. Look it up, and YOU can edit it yourself. mytwin 03:46, 3 July 2010
I'm kinda new, my bad. mytwin 03:51, 3 July 2010
Dear Jusdafax,
I represent Doug Adams, the author of the liner notes to The Lord of the Rings: The Complete Recordings as well as the upcoming book The Music of the Lord of the Rings Films. There are several instances of incorrect information that appear on this page, but every time I update them, they are reverted back to their original state. I assure you that I am not a vandal trying to destroy this page, the author and I are very close, and I am trying to fix the incorrect information.
Thank you,
Middle-D-Inc —Preceding unsigned comment added by Middle-D-Inc ( talk • contribs) 04:54, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar |
Thank you for all the vandal-fighting you've done on here. Much appreciated! MarmadukePercy ( talk) 06:14, 3 July 2010 (UTC) |
Many thanks, and I am much obliged for your good opinion! Best wishes, Jusdafax 07:04, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The Purple Star | |
I noticed your userpage was vandalized over 200 times, so I thought I would give you this Zonafan39 ( talk) 07:35, 4 July 2010 (UTC) |
May I say I appreciate your gift of a barnstar as well. One can get compassion fatigue and burnout doing this, and these expressions of appreciation mean a lot to me. Best wishes, today and every day! Jusdafax 08:02, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
-- φ
OnePt618
Talk φ has given you a
pie! Pies promote the kind of hearty eating that puts a smile on your face and a sustaining meal in your stomach. Hopefully this pie has made your day better. Spread the goodness by giving someone else a pie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy eating! Spread the goodness of pie by adding {{ subst:Wikipie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
|
Well done, and cheers!-- φ OnePt618 Talk φ 07:47, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Do you have a reference that could be added for Crill's naming rationale? Otherwise the new bracketed text looks too speculative. AllyD ( talk) 08:12, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
This was a poor edit. Reverting all the content using a script like this while a speedy tag is on the article misleadingly gives the impression of there being no content; I mistakenly speedied it as 'no context' before my error was pointed out. The article creator did provide a source (a Soapcentral recap), and you removed far more than just "dubious unsourced content", such as the actress, infobox, and times of appearances, indeed you basically blanked the whole article. Actually the content all looks perfectly verifiable to me from a look through Google News archives. Please don't bite the newbies. I hope this isn't your usual approach to dealing with new articles and editors. Fences& Windows 16:24, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
...for reverting vandalism on my user page! Greetings from Amsterdam, Kwiki ( talk) 23:02, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
-- White Shadows There goes another day 17:22, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Was sorry to see you went along with the speedy Fuster deletion rockin guy. Other more experienced editors (I know, "how can that be with 45,000 contributions?!) would have given us time to get additional references, especially since Doc Fuster agreed to add GNU copyright free language to his sites. EENG was hostile from day one, and might have something against Fuster we are missing. We don't know the guy at all, just saw a review about him getting an award, and figured he's notable. Needless to say he will no longer give permission for anything, given EENG's style (calling his accomplishments "fawning" on the talk page!? Cripes, this is the guy who DISCOVERED memory cells, and there are numerous "orange" references to him on Wiki that now still won't go to a page thanks to EENG). After spending hours doing links in that article and communicating with the principal, we'll revert to being an EENG type editor, throwing stones, dispensing templates, but adding no value unless invited by another editor or administrator with more clout that EENG types, who can provide air cover for our work. Learned a valuable lesson here: don't contribute and waste a bunch of work and time unless you've got admins to go to battle for you, and give enough time to complete the research. We would have been happy to work with EENG, but he made it clear from edit one that he wanted only a role of telling us what to do, not adding anything himself! No tanks to dat. Good stuff on the rock and roll work, maybe you can help with our Loy article? Phoenixthebird ( talk) 19:22, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
PS: I'll need to contact Etrigan on Loy, I've now noticed that EENG is targeting ALL our articles, and vandalizing and adding templates to all of them, as a vendetta. Can any of you guys discipline this character? Raining on a newbie is one thing, specifically targeting work as a vendetta has to be against some rule since there are so many here!!! Phoenixthebird ( talk) 19:31, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
On User talk:124.150.49.182 you added a template message. I'm currently getting used to correctly applying these when reverting edits. Could you please tell me which template you used? Thanks. Mltinus ( talk) 14:02, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
First time it's been vandalized, apparently... GregorB ( talk) 20:36, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Can you say me, what is wrong which this ? -- DC Fan 5 ( talk) 20:29, 13 July 2010 (UTC) Nothing, it seems, as I misunderstood your intent. Sorry about that. I have noted this at the AIV page where you also commented earlier. Jusdafax 20:42, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Our friend from CT (aka '75' aka Techwriter2B aka ....) is back. Thought you might find the AN/I thread of interest [4]. Best Eurytemora ( talk) 03:37, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Cybercobra has given you a
cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
![]() |
The Special Barnstar | |
For going above and beyond on ANI, alerting authorities and recognizing that there are real lives behind all of these user names. Smashville talk 15:10, 14 July 2010 (UTC) |
Many thanks! This was the first time I've phoned the cops about something from the encyclopedia, but the officer was friendly, interested, and even looked to see the "evidence" for himself, with a little prompting from me on how to find the history. I appreciate the barnstar; of course, here's hoping there is no actual attack and they can find this kid and scare some sense into him. Jusdafax 15:38, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The Real Life Barnstar | |
For what is likely the single most important thing you will ever do on Wikipedia. Toddst1 ( talk) 16:34, 14 July 2010 (UTC) |
p.s. You are now entitled to display this. Toddst1 ( talk) 16:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Not at all -- I'm glad we have this kind of oversight operating. It improves all the work that happens here! Civilizeme ( talk) 19:50, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Many thanks for removing the vandalism on my page Vrenator ( talk) 15:20, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Jusdafax,
Why are you attempting to delete entire sections of the page I have worked hard to edit and expand for Christ Episcopal Church? I believe that the information I have added to the page is entirely referenced and accurate. Please let me know what is inappropriate about the current version of the page.
Thanks!
Mbalulescu ( talk) 19:31, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
I will be sure to provide a summary for my edits. Thank you for your understanding, and I appreciate that I did not get a warning :)
Mbalulescu ( talk) 21:40, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
I appreciate the note. If I can help in any way ask anytime. Good fortunes to you! Jusdafax 19:38, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Don't take this as vandalism - I only want to talk to you. "The subject of ICP cards has been ranked as #2 on the "things that no one gives a shit about" list, with prunes being #1" was something that was passed on to me. I feel that any facts like these should be communicated. Please inform of a better way to communicate this info - I do not want to be banned from wikipedia.
Hello, I deleted the tag from the article on "Andre DeJuan", but I did not create the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redeyewatchman ( talk • contribs) 21:40, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello. I regret to have to inform you that after just three days of silence that he/she is back and as bad as ever. (Please see [6], [7], [8], [9], and [10].) I started the last AN/I case ( [11]) and Eurytemora the one in June ( [12]). I'm wondering if you would be willing to start a third as I am probably too much out front on this and it may be more effective if the next one was started by a third editor. I will, of course, be happy to contribute to the discussion in my usual well documented way. WP really needs to be rid of this troublemaker for good. Many thanks!!! Centpacrr ( talk) 19:27, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Outstanding thought... further research is needed on this one! Jusdafax 03:06, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
And if I can help in some way, let me know. Jusdafax 17:25, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
I am unfamiliar with the "LTA list" and don't know where to find it. Could one of you provide a link? Thanks. Jusdafax 05:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting the vandalism from my talk page. (Sorry if this was a bit late.) — MC10 ( T• C• GB• L) 19:45, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
I've started a discussion on adding the subject as question #4 at the RfA talk page. I'm bad at wordsmithing, so if you have some phrasing you think would be good could you add it there? Thanks again for the barnstar! Hobit ( talk) 02:07, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
I have revoked your rollback until this situation is dealt with. It should have been fairly clear that the editor, who is likely the subject of the article, was acting in good faith. Definitely not a case for rollback + warn. NW ( Talk) 03:16, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Dear Mr. Jusdafax,
Thanks for protecting this page from vandalism. I am a minor editor and lacking of knowledge of the security issue / protection of wiki articles. This page is being vandalized frequently by some unknowns. would you please take necessary steps.
Thank you. - Mmh-duke ( talk) 16:46, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. :) Mmh-duke ( talk) 05:26, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
L. Martin Griffin, Jr. at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Nsk92 (
talk)
17:49, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
-- Stepheng3 ( talk) 19:23, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
By the way, I assume you're aware of Wikipedia:Red link. If not, you might want to review it.-- Stepheng3 ( talk) 21:16, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
I just saw what you said at Chris' talk, and I want to thank you for the kind words—and right back at you too! -- Tryptofish ( talk) 20:10, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Howdy. In a recent RfA I noticed you commented that a nominee had made no edits to AIV. Is there a tool/link that you know of that will show how many edits I've made there?-- Rockfang ( talk) 23:00, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
He vandalizes again!!!!!! 77.233.70.192 ( talk) 11:18, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() | On August 5, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article L. Martin Griffin, Jr., which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 06:02, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Are you Egyptian? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Capolinho ( talk • contribs) 21:40, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
I have been trying to deal with this vandal on Waldemeer Park. Thanks for your efforts! T3h 1337 b0y 21:59, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Judas quick question idont understand what is vandilism on here im new today please help answer on my page thank u very much i didt know what that text was is it possible to add you friend —Preceding unsigned comment added by MetalShark ( talk • contribs) 22:05, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
how do i make my page have stuff like that and how u get pic
have you read my user page MetalShark ( talk) 00:47, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
I have, and you are very kind. By the way I'm actually called Jusdafax like it was Juss-da-fax or even Just-the-facts. Seemed like a good name for a Wikipedian. It actually comes from Just the facts, ma'am, supposedly said by Joe Friday on the super old Dragnet TV show. Cheers! Jusdafax 00:54, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
For helping to revert that annoying ip's edits to the tennis players' pages :) - BlagoCorzine2016 ( talk) 04:05, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi editing IanMccreas page trying to put in a relevant article about him being in a no pope here page on FB but it was removed,is it against your rules?thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hollowpoint71 ( talk • contribs) 12:19, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for helping me on the [Projecto Moda] page! Still the page is getting vandalized i guess. Someone keeps changing things. Is it possible to block someone or whatever? Once again thenks for helping me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monoculo ( talk • contribs) 23:58, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() | On 12 August 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Colombia–Venezuela relations, which you nominated and substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
-- Courcelles 06:41, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Hooray! Many thanks, but I had some pretty good help, so thanks to them too. This is another first for me, and I find I like ITN. Jusdafax 06:49, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Done - By my count you got 1,300 characters. Standing by for your reaction. 8D
Jusdafax
09:22, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
are u online im metalsharks friend my name is metalshark02 i added u 2 my watchlist —Preceding unsigned comment added by Metalshark02 ( talk • contribs) 22:57, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Jusdafax. I see at User talk:KyleAraujo you helped an editor to get an article deleted by inviting the author to blank the page, and then tagging it as author blanked. This did the job OK, but I thought I would mention that you could have achieved the same effect more easily by simply adding {{ db-author}} to the article, once the author has requested deletion, without asking them to blank it first. It also helps to say (either in an edit summary or on the article's talk page) where the author's request is, if it isn't somewhere obvious. JamesBWatson ( talk) 09:41, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
FYI, the registered user user:Premiermaple has deleted the majority of the content in the semi-protected entry you helped with yesterday - you may not have noticed. I've restored it again. Is there something we can do about this user? -- C Hawke ( talk) 07:56, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for keeping that IP user from vandalizing the page. Hopefully he'll stop soon.
A point of fact: I'm not sure if the chapter at Yeshiva is active or not. Will look into it. -- Mblumber ( talk) 15:24, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello, your nomination of Kent Island (California) at DYK has been reviewed and comments provided. -- NortyNort (Holla) 10:42, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Hey, I left you a question there. I've semi'd the article for a week in the meantime, so there's no rush, I'd just like to hear your thoughts since, imo, the only reason you can;t do it yourself is a technicality! ;) Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:02, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Our friend from CT ( Techwriter2B) is back and causing more trouble, this time in ANI here. I would appreciate your comments and/or assistance there. Thanks. Centpacrr ( talk) 21:23, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() | On 18 August 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 17 August 2010 Baghdad bombing, which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
-- tariqabjotu 00:15, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() | On 18 August 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kent Island (California), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Courcelles 18:03, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Many thanks! Jusdafax 18:41, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Very nice start and I hope you don't mind my fiddling. Sorry about the edit conflicts - I am out of it for now, so it's all yours again! Thanks and best wishes DBaK ( talk) 09:12, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
I just wanted to send you a very quick message to thank you for creating the Undershaw page. I am not a very experienced Wikipedian but I will aim to develop the page over the forthcoming weeks. I have also asked for further assistance via a blog on my website at 'bfronline.biz'. Again, many many thanks, prspiring. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prspiring ( talk • contribs) 21:22, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Many thanks. I will do my very best to learn the conventions and protocols. Best wishes. Prspiring ( talk) 21:55, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Jusdafax, I see you are very quick at reverting vandalism. I appreciate your speedy restoration of the talk page section I posted on Talk:Epimetheus_Society. Keep up the good work. -- WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk) 16:34, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
"Delete - What a mess. " [16] Delete? So you are also against Hare Krishna portal??? You must be either fool or rascal. Yes, this page is still messy, but just because there are so many materialists and atheists here all around, and even having their atheism portal on this wikipedia, so why there should be no Hare Krishna portal??? So if you say - delete Hare Krishna portal, I say then - delete your atheism portal, then I it may be ok. You may leave there buddhism, impersonalism, but all those not authoritative stuff is not to be there. Buddha is avatara of Vishnu. And also Shankaracarya is Shiva, who also being biggest impersonalist, also accepted Krishna, Narayana to be Supreme Personality of Godhead and necessity to worship Him. But that atheism portal in present form has no right to exist. Buddha came to stop atheism - ok, but all those garbage - take that away. I mean impersonalist, so-called followers of Shankaracarya they are rascals, because they do not accept Krishna, Supreme Personality of Godhead, and worship only His impersonal Brahmajyoti rays of His transcendental body. So anyway, wikipedia now disinforms very much, so I challenge wikipedia atheim portal with this Hare Krishna portal. Alternatively, if you insist that Hare Krishna portal is to be not on wikipedia, than I have all the rights to insists that atheism portal to be removed. Just as atheists claim that there is no God, so we can say that they are offenders. And they must be punished. So this punishment for them - first of all - removal of atheism portal. Next we would see. Hare Krishna. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.133.117.5 ( talk) 20:05, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your support in my RfA. Keeping Wikipedia clean sounds like a great goal to pursue! Cheers, Nikkimaria ( talk) 14:51, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Several years ago I read a very detailed bio of Doyle that included lots of details about Undershaw. It was a pretty good bood. I wish I could remember the name. You are most welcome and congrats on the fine article. Dincher ( talk) 00:25, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Just for future reference, you might want to see what I did here. WP:NAMEDREFS makes pages easier to read in edit mode, reduces the number of footnotes, and makes citation templates easier to fill out completely because it only has to be done once. One more support and I'll put it on the main page. Courcelles 08:04, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() | On 26 August 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 25 August 2010 Iraq bombings, which you substantially updated and recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
-- tariqabjotu 10:32, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! I think we (several other editors were substantially involved) wrote a reasonably good article there, and I appreciate the ITN exposure. Jusdafax 10:37, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() | On 29 August 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bolinas Ridge, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 12:02, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Many thanks! Jusdafax 12:05, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() | On 30 August 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Undershaw, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 06:02, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
And again, many thanks!
Re: Sintal Agriculture PLC. Please read what the PROD template says. It can be removed at any time by anyone. If it is removed, you cannot replace it.
If you don't believe that the article is a candidate for speedy deletion, your next step is to nominate it for deletion through AfD. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 15:15, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
User 122.58.191.195 has made a couple of dozen edits to the same page I am working on, for now, mostly to improve readability and to remove attribution problems, now and in the future. I plan to look for legitimate sources when the basic readability of the page is improved. From his edit history it's obvious he has an interest in New Zealand (and may live there) but the volume of minor edits/undos is kind of astonishing.
I don't want to get into an edit war with someone but feel my command of the King's English is better than his, and that my effort to improve the basic readability of an article that needs a tremendous amount of work (including verifiable sources) should not be in vain. One thing that irritates me his addition of links that only look like links. They are only text attributions with no way to check the source.
Could you please have a look at the edit history of
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Invasion_of_Waikato&action=history
and let me know what you think? I'd rather not escalate this, but I feel someone is taking advantage of the system to promote his own beliefs, style, and way of saying things, to the detriment of what I feel could be a good wiki article about the early years of a well-considered nation.
I'm asking you because you have proven to be fair with your judgements in the past (including with me), and are likely to recommend a reasonable course of action. One person (unsigned, doh, but still added to its own section on my talk page) actually complimented me on the improvements, so I figure there have to be at least two people who like what I've done.
Cheers, Kadathdreamques ( talk) 01:05, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
sorry about the quick add, but the user noted above has already been admonished for poor editing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:122.58.191.195&action=history
Kadathdreamques ( talk) 01:14, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
No it's not resolved, but it's also not an explosive issue at this time. I suspect that 122.58.191.195 will be busy editing while I am asleep. My last edit removed some improperly attributed edits by him, with the note that previous senior editors have already warned him about adding original unattributed material (escalated to level 3). Basically I don't want to waste my time improving an article if someone is determined to keep downgrading it with poorly edited posts and impossible to verify sources.
I'm not sure how WIki deals with these kinds of edits. It's not vandalism per se, but it seems to be motivated by a personal agenda. Kadathdreamques ( talk) 02:59, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Hey, I noticed that you had recently edited the Iraq bombing attack article, and I hoped that you could help out on another collaborative community edited project.
I run quippd, a collaboratively edited social news site, which mixes elements of Wikis, social networking, and social news sites. You can get some more information about what we are doing at: http://quippd.com/about/intro
Basically, we want to get good coverage on news stories, collaboratively edited, like Wikipedia. We are trying to take the ideas of WikiFactCheck -- to make news less biased and speedier (unlike something like Wikinews). By combining social elements to the project, we hope to bring the benefits of wiki enabled fact checking and npov ideas to the masses.
I hope you check us out -- and feel free to contact me with any questions, comments, or concerns.
-- Yoasif ( talk) 03:55, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
I saw your comment that you want to speak in defense of HJ Mitchell. I'm just trying to figure out what that means. Are you saying that you think it was a good block and within policy? Or are you just saying that you think HJ Mitchell is a swell guy anyway?-- Cube lurker ( talk) 22:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |