I would like to correct a mistake (made by me earlier) in the article. Please see talk discussion on Orbital_Inclination
J mareeswaran ( talk) 14:40, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
What is wrong with specifying that St Charles I of England is celebrated in the Church of England? -- Richardson mcphillips ( talk) 13:48, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The Society of King Charles the Martyr is an Anglican society, which is another word for Church of England. Do you know anyone other than the Church of England who venerates him? -- Richardson mcphillips ( talk) 20:32, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Hey Jonathunder—I saw that you were listed or active near Madison. If indeed you are, you are invited to the upcoming edit-a-thon:
- Saturday, March 5th, 9:30 a.m. – noon
- Madison Public Library (Madison, Wisconsin)
- Bring a laptop! There will be snacks and daycare
RSVP on the event page if you plan to attend or have any suggestions. And if you want to be automatically contacted for future Madison-area events, be sure to add your name to the invite list. czar 23:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
I reverted you there because it had already been closed here. Several folks have already posted thoughts at: Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Hawkeye7 2/Bureaucrat chat if you want to still voice a thought. — Ched : ? 06:49, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
The Loft Literary Center edit-a-thon | |
---|---|
|
Hello! Your submission of psychology of eating meat at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset ( talk) 15:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
This reversion and the edit summary you provided was not helpful at all. Why didn't you take it to talk instead of performing a drive-by reversion? -- Scjessey ( talk) 15:55, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Can you explain to me the logic of this edit: Jonathunder's edit to Cruz campaign article? I admit that confuse Judge Posner with his son. But I left Posner in the article--as you requested--then American In Brazil added Elhauge and Clinton, I removed Elhauge and Clinton, and then you used my confusion between Posner and his son as the reason for you to re-add Elhauge and Clinton to the article. What is the rationale behind this edit? Also, do you agree with American In Brazil that my removal of Elhauge and Clinton is vandalism? Inquiring minds want to know.-- ML ( talk) 17:29, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
For the fourth time today MaverickLittle has reverted the same edits. This violates the WP three revert rule. Can something be done about this belligerent editor who refuses to accept consensus and follow WP rules? American In Brazil ( talk) 21:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
I'm happy to compromise. Leave the citations in. American In Brazil ( talk) 22:31, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Both of you have broken the three-revert rule now. Any chance you'll stop and start working out a compromise? Jonathunder ( talk) 22:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Six reverts by ML now. I have counted three on my side. American In Brazil ( talk) 22:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Here it is: Natural-born-citizen clause, 5.3.3 Ted Cruz American In Brazil ( talk) 23:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
On 15 FEB 2017 I made 3 reverts, ML made 6. What's being done about ML's violation of WP:3RR? American In Brazil ( talk) 00:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
I don't think this is going to be solved here and I don't have time to edit Wikipedia today. So please use the article talk page and perhaps other editors will chime in. Thank you. Jonathunder ( talk) 15:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
This article is what I love about Wikipedia. It was nominated for deletion a few days ago, and with the efforts of a few editors it has become an very interesting article about a little-known place. Thanks for your great edits today, and sorry for my seemingly harsh revert. Cheers. Magnolia677 ( talk) 00:30, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Hey there! On January 26, you semiprotected Planet Nine, noting in the protection log "Hopefully semiprotection can be lifted once no longer on Main Page". Planet Nine has now been off the main page for some time, and its views have dropped significantly since it was protected. The page also has 172 watchers, so vandalism should be reverted quickly. Planet Nine is a hot, developing topic where input from the scientific community, many of whom do not have accounts, is to be expected. For example, Mike Brown himself has commented on the talk page as an IP. So, I was wondering if you might be persuaded to unprotect Planet Nine for now? A2soup ( talk) 15:21, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Good idea. Perhaps you could add " Supreme Justice" before Antonin? Zigzig20s ( talk) 00:33, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
I have been discussing one of your edits on the Ted Cruz campaign article. You can review my comments here: Jonathunder's edit to Cruz article that created two footnotes for the exact same editorial and how it was obvious that this admin editor did not actually read the citations before adding them into the article, but yet admin editor Jonathunder was critical of my edit and immediately reverted my edit while sitting back and watching American In Brazil beat me over the head with insults and lies about vandalism. -- ML ( talk) 18:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Regarding your claim that "Sanders has a religion, and it's cited", [1] Can you please provide a citation that where Sanders himself says that his religion is Judaism? Here are references where he says otherwise:
-- Guy Macon ( talk) 20:28, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
On 19 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Psychology of eating meat, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that research into the psychology of eating meat suggests a correlation between meat-eating and support for hierarchy and inequality? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
I'm wondering why you insist on taking down the links to commemorations and collects from the Calendar of Saints (Episcopal Church) page. I think that links that go directly to the prayer for that particular saint makes the Calendar more usable to anyone using the Calendar as a calendar and not just a list. At the least, the links go to the BCP, Holy Men, Holy Women, and A Great Cloud of Witnesses and reinforce how the saints for commemoration were chosen and communicated. It had been many years since I last participated in editing on Wikipedia, but a desire to make the Calendar of Saints more functional is why I setup a new ID. I also started a thread on the Talk page for the calendar.
Dwsmith84 ( talk) 15:07, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
it says you took this last year... really? Can't be... 75.172.224.240 ( talk) 03:05, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
On 7 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cibolo Creek Ranch, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Cibolo Creek Ranch, where Antonin Scalia died, was a shooting location for the films The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada, There Will Be Blood, and No Country for Old Men? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cibolo Creek Ranch. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:03, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Jonathunder, didn't get you get the warning to look out for previous ds alerts on Blue Salix's page? Your blp ds alert came one minute after mine. Bishonen | talk 21:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC).
MaverickLittle, I've noticed you have found some new photographs, and cited them as your "own work". Are you a professional photographer? If not, these images cannot be your own work. Please specify further where these may have originated from. -- Ches (talk) (contribs) 19:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
When several people consider your tone uncivil, it just might be that your writing comes across as abrasive, even if that's not your intention. Also, if people go down roads you don't like, you don't have to follow them. Jonathunder ( talk) 22:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the invite to the twin cities event. I couldn't make it, but it would be fun to make a future one. dfrankow ( talk) 21:16, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of S/2015 (136472) 1 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Wugapodes ( talk) 00:30, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Sheldon Theatre at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Jonathunder is engaging in an obvious edit-war by reverting and removing material I put on the Talk pages of Merrick Garland and Merrick Garland SUpreme Court Nomination. He is trying to avoid the development of a consensus that reference to withdrawing the nomination of Garland is being made by reliable sources in the news media. I will be adding such references shortly, but I wanted to establish the propriety of doing so. Thugs like Jonathunder and Neutrality have decided to try to prevent me from doing so, and thus obstructing the discussion. 75.175.105.188 ( talk) 22:40, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Ongoing_civility_and_ownership_problems_at_Obergefell_v._Hodges -- Nat Gertler ( talk) 14:03, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 174.25.48.161 ( talk) 16:47, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
The article Arthur Llewllyn Williams has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. Dubbin
u |
t |
c 14:52, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect LCB Leasing. Since you had some involvement with the LCB Leasing redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Traditionalist ( talk) 11:25, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
On 11 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Larson's Hunters Resort, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the Swedish immigrants who built Larson's Hunters Resort on the western border of Minnesota initially lived in a dugout? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Larson's Hunters Resort. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Maile ( talk) 12:42, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
I wish I saw your post before I finished. What I'm doing is making the pages consistent as with the other US cathedral wiki pages which have the cathedral names along with their location.
Roberto221 ( talk) 19:37, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
I skipped the Jacob Nuffer Farmstead on my 2012 pass through Rock County merely because I deemed it too far off my route, or possibly because I lost too much time looking for those long-gone bridges. However in looking at it now via online satellite imagery and comparing it to the NRHP nomination and photos, it is clear that all or nearly all of the historical buildings on the farm have been razed. I woudn't go out of your way for that one.
The rest of your prospective list looks great. I'm assuming the unlisted NRHP and museum sites in those counties are too far off the I-90 corridor for you. There's always some lame stubs in the county categories ( Category:Nobles County, Minnesota) — usually schools and lakes — that could be photographed.
Happy trails! - McGhiever ( talk) 02:44, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
I would like to correct a mistake (made by me earlier) in the article. Please see talk discussion on Orbital_Inclination
J mareeswaran ( talk) 14:40, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
What is wrong with specifying that St Charles I of England is celebrated in the Church of England? -- Richardson mcphillips ( talk) 13:48, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The Society of King Charles the Martyr is an Anglican society, which is another word for Church of England. Do you know anyone other than the Church of England who venerates him? -- Richardson mcphillips ( talk) 20:32, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Hey Jonathunder—I saw that you were listed or active near Madison. If indeed you are, you are invited to the upcoming edit-a-thon:
- Saturday, March 5th, 9:30 a.m. – noon
- Madison Public Library (Madison, Wisconsin)
- Bring a laptop! There will be snacks and daycare
RSVP on the event page if you plan to attend or have any suggestions. And if you want to be automatically contacted for future Madison-area events, be sure to add your name to the invite list. czar 23:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
I reverted you there because it had already been closed here. Several folks have already posted thoughts at: Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Hawkeye7 2/Bureaucrat chat if you want to still voice a thought. — Ched : ? 06:49, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
The Loft Literary Center edit-a-thon | |
---|---|
|
Hello! Your submission of psychology of eating meat at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset ( talk) 15:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
This reversion and the edit summary you provided was not helpful at all. Why didn't you take it to talk instead of performing a drive-by reversion? -- Scjessey ( talk) 15:55, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Can you explain to me the logic of this edit: Jonathunder's edit to Cruz campaign article? I admit that confuse Judge Posner with his son. But I left Posner in the article--as you requested--then American In Brazil added Elhauge and Clinton, I removed Elhauge and Clinton, and then you used my confusion between Posner and his son as the reason for you to re-add Elhauge and Clinton to the article. What is the rationale behind this edit? Also, do you agree with American In Brazil that my removal of Elhauge and Clinton is vandalism? Inquiring minds want to know.-- ML ( talk) 17:29, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
For the fourth time today MaverickLittle has reverted the same edits. This violates the WP three revert rule. Can something be done about this belligerent editor who refuses to accept consensus and follow WP rules? American In Brazil ( talk) 21:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
I'm happy to compromise. Leave the citations in. American In Brazil ( talk) 22:31, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Both of you have broken the three-revert rule now. Any chance you'll stop and start working out a compromise? Jonathunder ( talk) 22:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Six reverts by ML now. I have counted three on my side. American In Brazil ( talk) 22:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Here it is: Natural-born-citizen clause, 5.3.3 Ted Cruz American In Brazil ( talk) 23:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
On 15 FEB 2017 I made 3 reverts, ML made 6. What's being done about ML's violation of WP:3RR? American In Brazil ( talk) 00:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
I don't think this is going to be solved here and I don't have time to edit Wikipedia today. So please use the article talk page and perhaps other editors will chime in. Thank you. Jonathunder ( talk) 15:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
This article is what I love about Wikipedia. It was nominated for deletion a few days ago, and with the efforts of a few editors it has become an very interesting article about a little-known place. Thanks for your great edits today, and sorry for my seemingly harsh revert. Cheers. Magnolia677 ( talk) 00:30, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Hey there! On January 26, you semiprotected Planet Nine, noting in the protection log "Hopefully semiprotection can be lifted once no longer on Main Page". Planet Nine has now been off the main page for some time, and its views have dropped significantly since it was protected. The page also has 172 watchers, so vandalism should be reverted quickly. Planet Nine is a hot, developing topic where input from the scientific community, many of whom do not have accounts, is to be expected. For example, Mike Brown himself has commented on the talk page as an IP. So, I was wondering if you might be persuaded to unprotect Planet Nine for now? A2soup ( talk) 15:21, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Good idea. Perhaps you could add " Supreme Justice" before Antonin? Zigzig20s ( talk) 00:33, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
I have been discussing one of your edits on the Ted Cruz campaign article. You can review my comments here: Jonathunder's edit to Cruz article that created two footnotes for the exact same editorial and how it was obvious that this admin editor did not actually read the citations before adding them into the article, but yet admin editor Jonathunder was critical of my edit and immediately reverted my edit while sitting back and watching American In Brazil beat me over the head with insults and lies about vandalism. -- ML ( talk) 18:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Regarding your claim that "Sanders has a religion, and it's cited", [1] Can you please provide a citation that where Sanders himself says that his religion is Judaism? Here are references where he says otherwise:
-- Guy Macon ( talk) 20:28, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
On 19 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Psychology of eating meat, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that research into the psychology of eating meat suggests a correlation between meat-eating and support for hierarchy and inequality? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
I'm wondering why you insist on taking down the links to commemorations and collects from the Calendar of Saints (Episcopal Church) page. I think that links that go directly to the prayer for that particular saint makes the Calendar more usable to anyone using the Calendar as a calendar and not just a list. At the least, the links go to the BCP, Holy Men, Holy Women, and A Great Cloud of Witnesses and reinforce how the saints for commemoration were chosen and communicated. It had been many years since I last participated in editing on Wikipedia, but a desire to make the Calendar of Saints more functional is why I setup a new ID. I also started a thread on the Talk page for the calendar.
Dwsmith84 ( talk) 15:07, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
it says you took this last year... really? Can't be... 75.172.224.240 ( talk) 03:05, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
On 7 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cibolo Creek Ranch, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Cibolo Creek Ranch, where Antonin Scalia died, was a shooting location for the films The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada, There Will Be Blood, and No Country for Old Men? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cibolo Creek Ranch. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:03, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Jonathunder, didn't get you get the warning to look out for previous ds alerts on Blue Salix's page? Your blp ds alert came one minute after mine. Bishonen | talk 21:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC).
MaverickLittle, I've noticed you have found some new photographs, and cited them as your "own work". Are you a professional photographer? If not, these images cannot be your own work. Please specify further where these may have originated from. -- Ches (talk) (contribs) 19:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
When several people consider your tone uncivil, it just might be that your writing comes across as abrasive, even if that's not your intention. Also, if people go down roads you don't like, you don't have to follow them. Jonathunder ( talk) 22:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the invite to the twin cities event. I couldn't make it, but it would be fun to make a future one. dfrankow ( talk) 21:16, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of S/2015 (136472) 1 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Wugapodes ( talk) 00:30, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Sheldon Theatre at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Jonathunder is engaging in an obvious edit-war by reverting and removing material I put on the Talk pages of Merrick Garland and Merrick Garland SUpreme Court Nomination. He is trying to avoid the development of a consensus that reference to withdrawing the nomination of Garland is being made by reliable sources in the news media. I will be adding such references shortly, but I wanted to establish the propriety of doing so. Thugs like Jonathunder and Neutrality have decided to try to prevent me from doing so, and thus obstructing the discussion. 75.175.105.188 ( talk) 22:40, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Ongoing_civility_and_ownership_problems_at_Obergefell_v._Hodges -- Nat Gertler ( talk) 14:03, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 174.25.48.161 ( talk) 16:47, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
The article Arthur Llewllyn Williams has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. Dubbin
u |
t |
c 14:52, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect LCB Leasing. Since you had some involvement with the LCB Leasing redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Traditionalist ( talk) 11:25, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
On 11 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Larson's Hunters Resort, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the Swedish immigrants who built Larson's Hunters Resort on the western border of Minnesota initially lived in a dugout? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Larson's Hunters Resort. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Maile ( talk) 12:42, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
I wish I saw your post before I finished. What I'm doing is making the pages consistent as with the other US cathedral wiki pages which have the cathedral names along with their location.
Roberto221 ( talk) 19:37, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
I skipped the Jacob Nuffer Farmstead on my 2012 pass through Rock County merely because I deemed it too far off my route, or possibly because I lost too much time looking for those long-gone bridges. However in looking at it now via online satellite imagery and comparing it to the NRHP nomination and photos, it is clear that all or nearly all of the historical buildings on the farm have been razed. I woudn't go out of your way for that one.
The rest of your prospective list looks great. I'm assuming the unlisted NRHP and museum sites in those counties are too far off the I-90 corridor for you. There's always some lame stubs in the county categories ( Category:Nobles County, Minnesota) — usually schools and lakes — that could be photographed.
Happy trails! - McGhiever ( talk) 02:44, 12 May 2016 (UTC)