This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hillary Clinton article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49Auto-archiving period: 30 days

view ·  Frequently asked questions Q1: Was there a dispute about what the article title should be? A1: Yes. From the early days on it was "Hillary Rodham Clinton", but over the years there were many formal requests for moves to change it to "Hillary Clinton". Discussions found no consensus on the article name until June 2015, when one found consensus and the article was moved to its current title. See the "This page was previously nominated to be moved" box elsewhere on this page for full details and links to the discussions – note some have to be revealed under the "Older discussions" link. There are strong feelings on both sides and discussions get progressively longer and more heated. Q2: The section on her 2016 presidential campaign leaves out some important things that have happened. What gives? A2: The main article is tight on space and the presidential campaign section is intentionally brief and kept to what is biographically most relevant. The daughter article Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016 has a much fuller treatment of the campaign and is where the greatest level of detail should go, especially anything describing the day-to-day, to-and-fro, ups-and-downs of a campaign. Q3: This article is POV! It's biased {for, against} her! It reads like it was written by {her PR team, Republican hatchet men}! A3: Complaints of bias are taken very seriously, but must be accompanied by specific areas of concern or suggestions for change. Vague, general statements do not help editors. Edits that add {{pov}} tags without providing a detailed explanation on the talk page will likely be reverted. Q4: Where is the article or section that lists her controversies? A4: There isn't one. All controversial material is included in the normal biographical sections they occur in, in this article (including sometimes in Notes or footnotes) and in the various daughter articles. Having a separate "controversies" or "criticisms" article or section is considered a violation of WP:NPOV, WP:Content forking, and WP:Criticism and also raises significant WP:BLP concerns. A special effort was undertaken to rid all 2008 presidential candidates' articles of such treatment – see here – and the same was done for other politicians' articles, including all the 2012 and 2016 candidates. This approach was also confirmed by the results of this AfD and this AfD. Q5: Something in the lead section doesn't have a footnote. I'm going to put a {{citation needed}} tag on it. A5: This article, like many others on Wikipedia, uses the approach of no citations in the lead section, as everything in the lead should be found in the body of the article, along with its citation. See guideline: MOS:LEADCITE.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

	Hillary Clinton is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 21, 2019.
Article milestones Date Process Result May 9, 2007 Good article nominee Listed May 14, 2007 Good article reassessment Delisted June 7, 2007 Good article nominee Listed October 14, 2007 Featured article candidate Not promoted January 21, 2008 Good article reassessment Kept February 28, 2008 Good article reassessment Kept May 27, 2008 Featured article candidate Not promoted May 18, 2009 Good article reassessment Kept June 6, 2009 Good article reassessment Kept December 13, 2014 Featured article candidate Promoted September 24, 2022 Featured article review Demoted Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on November 7, 2015, November 7, 2018, and November 7, 2020. Current status: Former featured article

This   level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Hillary Clinton ( inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hillary Clinton, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Hillary ClintonWikipedia:WikiProject Hillary ClintonTemplate:WikiProject Hillary ClintonHillary Clinton articles Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Top-importance). U.S. Congress High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is about one (or many) person(s). Barack Obama ( inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Barack Obama, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Barack ObamaWikipedia:WikiProject Barack ObamaTemplate:WikiProject Barack ObamaBarack Obama articles Politics: American Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Top-importance). United States: Arkansas / Cape Cod and the Islands / Presidential elections / Presidents / Government High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Arkansas (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - Cape Cod and the Islands (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Top-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject United States Presidents. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Top-importance). Chicago Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Illinois High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. New York (state) High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Women's History High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Women writers Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles International relations High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations: Eve Fairbanks (2008-04-09). "Wiki Woman". The New Republic. Alison Stewart, Rachel Martin (2008-04-03). "'Round the Clock: Obama, Clinton Wiki-Warfare". The Bryant Park Project, NPR. Brooke Gladstone (2008-04-04). "Editors in Chief". On The Media, NPR. John J. Miller (2008-04-21). "Liberal Web". National Review. Pascal Harter (2008-04-08). The World Today, BBC World Service. {{ cite news}}: Missing or empty |title= ( help) Jesse Brown (2008-04-10). "Hillary's Wiki Defender". Search Engine, CBC Radio One. Tom Foreman (2008-04-12). "Wikipedia Wars". This Week..., CNN. . Jeopardy!. 2008-05-07. {{ cite news}}: Missing or empty |title= ( help) Kelly Heyboer (2008-05-28). "Clinton's entry in Wikipedia has a watchdog". The Star-Ledger. Paul Murnane (2008-05-28). "one of two pieces aired". WCBS Newsradio 880. Maxwell Tani (2015-05-15). "Meet the guy who has protected Hillary Clinton's Wikipedia page for almost a decade". Business Insider. Elspeth Reeve (June 13, 2015). "The ladies who love Hillary". The New Republic. Roudman, Sam (June 7, 2016). "Wikipedia Wars Over Clinton As Presumptive Nominee". Vocativ. Wagner, Meg (October 13, 2016). "Hacker posts porn on Hillary Clinton's Wikipedia page". New York Daily News. Alcantara, Chris (October 27, 2016). "The most challenging job of the 2016 race: Editing the candidates' Wikipedia pages". The Washington Post.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Hillary Clinton was copied or moved into Legal career of Hillary Clinton with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article: You must follow the bold-revert-discuss cycle if your change is reverted. You may not reinstate your edit until you post a talk page message discussing your edit and have waited 24 hours from the time of this talk page message Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. Further information Enforcement procedures: Violations of any of these restrictions should be reported immediately to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. Editors who are aware of this topic being designated a contentious topic and who violate these restrictions may be sanctioned by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense. The contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topics sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Move logs: Hillary Rodham Clinton Hillary Clinton Discussions: RM, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton, Moved (panel closure), closed 8 May 2015, decision posted 11 June 2015 Older discussions: RM, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton, No consensus to move, closed 12 February 2007 RM, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton, No consensus to move (malformed move request, non-admin closure), closed 21 December 2007 RM, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton, No consensus to move, closed 18 June 2011 RM, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton, No consensus to move, closed 20 November 2012 RM, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton, Moved to Hillary Clinton (non-admin closure), closed 18 June 2013 MR, Closure as move of Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton, Moved back to Hillary Rodham Clinton (no clear consensus for the previous move), closed 28 June 2013 RM, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton, Speedy close as no consensus (non-admin closure), closed 24 February 2014 RM, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton, No consensus to move (admin panel closure), closed 21 April 2014 MR, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton, No consensus, default to endorse, and procedural restrictions established: No further move request to be started until February 2015, and between February 2015 and February 2017, or the closure of the next valid move request, whichever is earlier, no move request to be made unless at least 5,000 characters in length, closed 31 May 2014 RM, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Secretary Clinton, Speedy close since another RM open (non-admin closure), closed 17 April 2014 RM, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary (politician), Speedy close as unlikely and potentially disruptive (non-admin closure, rapidly endorsed by admin), closed 27 April 2014 RM, Hillary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton, Summarily closed citing prior declaration that if an RM is submitted prior to February 2017 it must be at least 5,000 characters in length (non-admin closure), closed 9 April 2015

Other talk page banners

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2016, when it received 17,801,991 views. This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 11 times. The weeks in which this happened: April 19 to 25, 2015 (15th) June 5 to 11, 2016 (19th) July 24 to 30, 2016 (1st) September 11 to 17, 2016 (20th) September 25 to October 1, 2016 (5th) October 2 to 8, 2016 (19th) October 9 to 15, 2016 (3rd) October 16 to 22, 2016 (6th) October 23 to 29, 2016 (18th) October 30 to November 5, 2016 (18th) November 6 to 12, 2016 (6th) Section sizes Section size for Hillary Clinton (52 sections) Section name Byte count Section total (Top) 9,228 9,228 Early life and education 29 24,182 Early life 8,062 8,062 Wellesley College years 9,049 9,049 Yale Law School and postgraduate studies 7,042 7,042 Marriage, family, legal career and first ladyship of Arkansas 213 26,914 From the East Coast to Arkansas 2,258 2,258 Early Arkansas years 7,321 7,321 Later Arkansas years 11,537 11,537 Bill Clinton 1992 presidential campaign 5,585 5,585 First Lady of the United States (1993–2001) 2,987 27,174 Health care and other policy initiatives 5,319 5,319 International diplomacy and promotion of women's rights 3,884 3,884 Scandals and investigations 5,304 5,304 It Takes a Village and other writings 3,732 3,732 Response to Lewinsky scandal 3,256 3,256 Save America's Treasures initiative 702 702 Traditional duties 1,990 1,990 U.S. Senate (2001–2009) 76 25,911 2000 U.S. Senate election 3,739 3,739 First term 13,567 13,567 2006 reelection campaign 2,621 2,621 Second term 5,908 5,908 2008 presidential campaign 14,423 14,423 Secretary of State (2009–2013) 472 45,781 Nomination and confirmation 4,576 4,576 Tenure 22,737 30,562 Overall themes 7,825 7,825 Benghazi attack and subsequent hearings 10,171 10,171 Email controversy 12,110 12,110 Clinton Foundation, Hard Choices, and speeches 7,213 7,213 2016 presidential campaign 21,269 21,269 Post-2016 election activities 12,675 12,675 Political positions 4,555 19,300 Economics 965 965 Domestic policy 3,260 3,260 LGBT rights 3,030 3,030 Immigration 2,318 2,318 Foreign policy 5,172 5,172 Religious views 1,239 1,239 Cultural and political image 10,896 10,896 Books and recordings 2,990 2,990 Ancestry 1,779 1,779 See also 248 248 Notes 24 24 References 15 4,768 Citations 34 34 Works cited 4,719 4,719 External links 108 8,456 Official 678 678 Media coverage 125 125 Other 7,545 7,545 Total 276,580 276,580

Throughout her political career, Hillary Clinton's communication style exhibited significant adaptations in response to her changing roles and the political environment. During her time leading the administration’s Health Reform Task Force, Clinton adopted a notably masculine style of speech. This shift was strategically aimed at navigating the predominantly male-oriented political arena of health policy reform. Studies highlight that during this period, there was a marked decrease in her use of traditionally feminine linguistic markers and an increase in masculine markers, such as usage of words over six letters and first-person plural pronouns, reflecting a more authoritative and collective communication approach (Jones 2016). As she transitioned from the First Lady to U.S. Senator, and later as Secretary of State, Clinton's masculine communication style became more pronounced, particularly during public and high-stakes engagements. The evolution of her linguistic style from 1992 to 2013 supports the expectation that Clinton's language grew increasingly masculine as her political involvement and positions of power expanded. This change aligns with broader patterns observed among female politicians who adopt masculine communication styles when seeking influence in male-dominated settings (Jones 2016). These shifts were not only responsive to immediate political challenges but also strategic adaptations to the gender expectations within political communication. The evolution of Clinton's communication style underscores the complexities female politicians face in navigating male-dominated political spheres, reflecting both gender dynamics and strategic communication adjustments. Citations: Jones, Jennifer J. 2016. “Talk ‘Like a Man’: The Linguistic Styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992-2013.” Perspectives on Politics 14 (3): 625-642. This article provides an analysis of Clinton's linguistic style adjustments over her career, illustrating how her communication strategies were influenced by her roles and the expectations of her as a female politician in various political contexts. Walteraleksic1011 ( talk) 20:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply