This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 |
@ John B123, Can you elaborate on why this might not be notable? As someone who has access to South Asian TV channels and print media, the news is flooded with this for the last few days, so I looked up and there wasn't an article about it, hence I created one. In any case, if you could express your concerns, I would attempt to fix them. Tame ( talk) 14:52, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Why you delete article Jagat Mama so quick, I am working on that page to improve.
Now I want to work on that page, help. Qweasdzxc ( talk) 02:41, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Ok Qweasdzxc ( talk) 14:08, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I hope all is well on your end! I noticed you placed a notability tag on Monique Ryan, which I had accepted through AfC earlier. As her h-index demonstrates on her Google Scholar, she would be a definite pass of Wikipedia:Notability (academics) in my book, and many an editor who review academics would agree that would be the case, I believe. As noted in WP:PROF, " failure to meet either the general notability guideline or other subject-specific notability guidelines is irrelevant if an academic is notable under this WP:NPROF guideline.". Generally, I would say having over 100 citations in 5 peer-reviewed scientific journals is a pass, and this case it's over 20 publications, including 10 with over 200 citations, and 1 with 1000+. Please let me know if you feel comfortable with myself removing the tag based on this message. Thank you! nearlyevil 665 15:25, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello John, Thank you for your message ! I do not hide from you that I am a little disappointed... Couldn't there be a way to find a solution? Your advice will be precious... You will have understood it: I am not English and rather specialized in rugby for 10 years on Wiki. France ! To read to you. Best regards. MENUISERIE91 ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 18:26, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for looking over the stubs I added for Kharakhutulia and Nanhsiungchelys! Cheers, - TimTheDragonRider ( talk) 19:08, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
[ Malecomes ] this man is insulting me and falsifying my resources Aydın memmedov2000 ( talk) 22:06, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Hey John B123, this is Derivator2017 here, I guess you're familiar with me. Thanks for reviewing my recent article, just here to say that I really a appreciate you for reviewing my articles. It's always a pleasure to have your articles reviewed by a veteran editor. However, it apparently seems like not everyone enjoys seeing me on this platform. I have recently created an article, Yara International School and it was placed on AfD for the third time by the same editor under the pretext of notability, despite me providing around 70 references this time and out of which 3 to 4 sources clearly make the article eligible for existence. Kindly review my article and place your opinion in the deletion discussion page. Warm regards. Derivator2017 ( talk) 19:31, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing my articles Georg Gossembrot and Cultural depictions of Holy Emperor Maximilian I. Deamonpen ( talk) 10:42, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, you tagged the article History of the University of Southern California for deletion. Is the copyright issue from me blatantly copying the entire history section of the main article, University of Southern California, or is it because the person who wrote the history section of USC plagiarized from another source, thus me and whoever wrote USC’s history section are bth guilty of plaigiarism. As far as I know there aren’t any rules against copying from another editor on Wikipedia. LMK if there are.
PS I looked into the source I supposedly plagiarized from, and that source is a Wikipedia mirror, copying its contents from USC’s main wikipedia page. Would it be possible for you to remove the speedy deletion tag? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MLGDatBoi1738 ( talk • contribs) 19:01, 26 January 2022 (UTC) -MLGDatBoi1738 1/26/22 — Preceding unsigned comment added by MLGDatBoi1738 ( talk • contribs) 18:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
From what you say on here you are or were a new page reviewer with over 175K edits. Why are you questioning notability? Particularly when it's not hard to show you that you aren't right? Justanother2 ( talk) 22:29, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi John - hope you are well. Apologies for those tags - I thought two articles on the same topic created at different times (with different names) got tagged for merging? I'm not 100% ofay in this area, hence the mistake. Thanks! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello John,
Hope you are safe and well!
Thank you for taking the time to address this discussion. I want to apologize to all the Wikipedia users, if NABC Framework article looks promotional, it may be rewritten to be more encyclopedic. However, I strongly believe ( Need, Approach, Benefits, and Competition (NABC)) framework deserves a respectful place in Wikipedia since it has been recognized by leaders from various industries and a simple google search shows its prevalence. I am adding references from the academic and scientific world below to support my argument as it is a widely accepted practice that has shaped a lot of innovations. None of the references was used in the original article and I am sharing them to reflect the method's wide acceptance.
NABC framework has been instrumental in developing technologies such as Siri (now used by Apple), HDTV and robotics surgeries systems for creating value proposition framework. It is as powerful as Business Model Canvas and I strongly believe more people should have awareness of this methodology as it is well recognized by the scientific and academic community.
If you believe, this sounds like an advertisement, I am more than happy to rewrite the article. However, I sincerely request you to consider this article beyond the tonality. After considering the sources mentioned below, if you believe this article should not be on Wikipedia, I can rewrite and touch base with you before creating a new page and seek your valuable input.
Redvall E.N. (2018) Reaching Young Audiences Through Research: Using the NABC Method to Create the Norwegian Web Teenage Drama SKAM/Shame. In: Thornley D. (eds) True Event Adaptation. Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97322-7_8
H. J. LeBlanc and F. Hassan, "A spiral approach to teach value propositions using the NABC framework in core engineering courses," 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2017, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2017.8190583. URL: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=8190583&isnumber=8190427
Fang, Ting Yien, Sarva Mangala Praveena, Claire deBurbure, Ahmad Zaharin Aris, Sharifah Norkhadijah Syed Ismail, and Irniza Rasdi. "Analytical techniques for steroid estrogens in water samples-A review." Chemosphere 165 (2016): 358-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.051
Wee, S.Y. and Aris, A.Z., 2017. Endocrine disrupting compounds in drinking water supply system and human health risk implication. Environment international, 106, pp.207-233. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412016310182?via%3Dihub
Evelina Thiger, Lotta Woxblom & Anders Roos (2017) Empathic design for wood product innovation based on genuine customer needs – A test application on Swedish builders, Wood Material Science & Engineering, 12:3, 118-128, DOI: 10.1080/17480272.2015.1056226 https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2015.1056226
P. Rathod, V. Julkunen, T. Kaisti and J. Nissilä, "Automatic acceptance testing of the web application security with ITU-T X.805 framework," 2015 Second International Conference on Computer Science, Computer Engineering, and Social Media (CSCESM), 2015, pp. 103-108, doi: 10.1109/CSCESM.2015.7331876. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7331876
Thank you John! fi$her ( talk) 14:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
I understand your concern on this page. However, I am making efforts to give it the ideal outlook. However, if there is any information you deem to remove to give it the ideal outlook that will be appreciated. Meanwhile, kindly remove the mark for deletion you have put on it. Thank you. Ojifo's Raphael ( talk) 22:12, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
I will work on it in a few hours. Thank you. Ojifo's Raphael ( talk) 22:34, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi User:John B123 I saw you on recent edits and wondered if you could help. I am a new user and I wanted to create a redirect Snoochie Shy to BBC Radio 1Xtra as she is a presenter on the show. Could you please thanks Linda Binson ( talk) 23:16, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
I hope you don't delete the page. I worked on it for quite a while. It is pretty standard biography stuff that I gathered for Ramazan. He is a respected scholar and I think he deserves a page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WithAngelica ( talk • contribs) 16:32, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Excellent, very good. I am new at this so I appreciate your assistance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WithAngelica ( talk • contribs) 10:43, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Please accept this note as an invitation to participate in the discussion of this latest FAC nomination for the nonmetal article.
The context is that you were involved in the FAC 3 discussion for the article (which was not prompted) or you are an editor who made a recent edit to the nonmetal article.
Thank you. Sandbh ( talk) 07:19, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello! What's refimproves you want for this article? All necessary information provided by necessary refs, also I create Links block: it confirms information without refs. Some info doesn't need for confirmation, because easy for checking (it'r rule of Wikipedia), rest info with citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Эдуард91 ( talk • contribs) 20:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi, you tagged List of largest cities of U.S. states and territories by historical population with a refimprove and I was wondering what additional references you think should be added? The main source is the Census report that's ref'ed at the top of the page (1790 to 1990 data); the text notes that the rest of the numbers come from the respective census reports. — Carter (Tcr25) ( talk) 21:06, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi!
Where do you think that there is a need for more sources in the article "Critique of work".
It would be great to get your input since you seem to see something which I don't. Or you might just be keen on general improvement, which you're very welcome to contribute. : ) Thanks.
Pauloroboto ( talk) 08:45, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello!
I've added more sources now, and hope that you feel that it's enough, otherwise you're very welcome to put the template back in place, or add sources which you deem good.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Pauloroboto ( talk) 09:23, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
That's great to hear. Thank you very much for paying attention to this since it improved the article. Any contributions are very welcome in the future.
Pauloroboto ( talk) 10:13, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi, John B123 I think you tagged this entry as a stub. I made some improvements: added more information and cited new sources. Do you think the tag still applies? Thank you for your help! -- Sirionnd1118 ( talk) 12:34, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Thank you so much! -- Sirionnd1118 ( talk) 12:25, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I have posted a comment on the Administrators' noticeboard: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Jokkmokks-Goran
Regards, Jokkmokks-Goran ( talk) 22:46, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I'm DMC511. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, 2022 Purdue Boilermakers football team, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
DMC511 ( talk) 10:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi @John B123,
This is regarding Data Dynamic page and as i am new here dint know about this way of discussing. Kindly help me understand why was it not reverted? how can i fix the page for it to be published? — Preceding unsigned comment added by VikramFenix29 ( talk • contribs) 06:08, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I have posted another comment on the Administrators' noticeboard: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Jokkmokks-Goran Regards, Jokkmokks-Goran ( talk) 13:52, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi John B123, just wanted to thank you for the review of the Red Bull Racing RB18 page. Also wanted to ask, did you mark the page as "patrolled" so that the the page can be eligible for indexing by search engines? It's hidden on Google and not showing up! Thanks F1V8V10V6! 08:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
I made that article from the corresponding article in the 1900 Dictionary of National Biography ( 1), which is in the public domain, and I included full attribution indicating that the source being copied was in the public domain. Why did you summarily delete it without AfDing? Now I have to start it again from scratch... Ficaia ( talk) 20:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I noticed you put a banner on the top of the Quianu Robinson article that says it requires more citations for verification. Is this for the piece of the article that describes his time in office, the reference to Conrad Hilton, or the anecdote at the bottom explaining that he was in the Knights of Columbus? Any clarification would be appreciated. Frost.xyz ( talk) 00:34, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I see that you reviewed the above article, now at Trial of Neumann and Sass. The article has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2022 February 14, so should the page be set to unpatrolled until the copyvio is resolved? TSventon ( talk) 22:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Sir 2402:8100:2618:2DD8:5C06:4C10:E1AA:7C6D ( talk) 06:37, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello, John B123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Jabbar (actor)".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:49, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Please see Draft:Caroline Henry - de-enabled from mainspace some months ago. Looks like the 'new' version has been copy-pasted from the draft. This wikilawyering of allegedly-non-notable public servants who are publicly-elected is one area that WP gets wrong, IMO, particularly where there is an established sequence of elected incumbents (you'll perhaps remember Andy Abrahams). rgds, -- Rocknrollmancer ( talk) 21:38, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
I really like to edit on Wikipedia and to make new article. Wik250 ( talk) 21:08, 24 February 2022 (UTC) |
Hi John, please have a look at the page now. I have removed copied stuff, added more content and citations.
Can you remove the tags now? Dr. Hamza Ebrahim ( talk) 20:00, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi, please stop tagging obviously verifiable book stubs with a short bit of summary with "more footnotes". See WP:WHEN. You've twice now put the same maintenance tag on an article that has a single, clearly attributed short paragraph. It's not helpful. I can't add a citation to it that says anything other than what the text of the article already says. -- asilvering ( talk) 19:07, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists, and captions, must be verifiable ... must include an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material. I don't see anything in WP:WHEN that supports a list of general references. See also Wikipedia:Further reading:
Further reading is not a list of general references. -- John B123 ( talk) 19:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation. A summary is not a quotation, nor is it "likely to be challenged"; but furthermore, the material is cited, just not footnoted. Book articles do not regularly use footnotes in their summaries (see, for example, WP:PLOTSUM). Indeed, even the Good Article criteria do not require footnotes for this kind of paragraph. You are correct that further reading is not a list of general references; I am not sure why you think that is relevant to mention here. -- asilvering ( talk) 19:50, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
The lead paragraph of an article is not supposed to contain citationsNo idea why you would think that, see MOS:LEADCITE. The book itself would be a primary source, see Wikipedia:WHYN regarding the need for secondary sources. -- John B123 ( talk) 21:19, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
The verifiability policy advises that material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, and direct quotations, should be supported by an inline citation. Any statements about living persons that are challenged or likely to be challenged must have an inline citation every time they are mentioned, including within the lead.Again, basic information like "this is a book by this author" is not "challenged" or "a direct quotation". The book is indeed a primary source for its own text, and is acceptable as a source for summarizing its own contents. Here is the relevant guideline for novels, which is analogous to academic books in this way: WP:NOVELPLOT. -- asilvering ( talk) 21:31, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi John, thank you for reviewing my new page on the NIH Oxford-Cambridge Scholars Program. I saw where you added the "Primary Sources" template to the page, so I added some additional secondary sources. Do you have any other suggestions on improving the article's citations? Furthermore, do you think any additional work is needed for it to pass "New Page" review (it remains "unreviewed")? -- FlamingMoth ( talk) 03:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, you reviewed an article I created before: Red Bull Racing RB18. I wanted to ask you if you could review another article I created about an upcoming video game - World War 3 (video game). Could you please mark it as reviewed? Thanks. F1V8V10V6! 16:43, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi John. Are you reviewing new pages again? Saw your review log has been quite active in recently. - Imcdc ( talk) 16:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, John B123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " St Leonards Gardens".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:03, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Canoeing at the 2017 European Youth Summer Olympic Festival and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 2#Canoeing at the 2017 European Youth Summer Olympic Festival until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. CLalgo ( talk) 13:48, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Hook update | ||
Your hook reached 11,670 views (486.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2022 – nice work! |
the automation of this function is in beta testing mode—please let me know if I've screwed up! theleekycauldron ( talk • contribs) (she/ they) 23:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
On 8 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Antonette Wemyss Gorman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Antonette Wemyss Gorman (pictured), the first woman to fill a combat role in the Caribbean, was promoted to rear admiral and is Chief of Defence Staff of the Jamaica Defence Force? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Antonette Wemyss Gorman. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Antonette Wemyss Gorman), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:02, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your share in IWD! I show two who didn't make it, one from Russia and one from Ukraine. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:04, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Hook update | ||
Your hook reached 11,670 views (486.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2022 – nice work! |
the automation of this function is in beta testing mode—please let me know if I've screwed up! theleekycauldron ( talk • contribs) (she/ they) 06:30, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Gooday - hope all is well with you - I am lying in bed, unable to enjoy the mini-heatwave! Some years ago I tried to make changes to motorcycle fairing, particularly in that one difficult (supposed)-American editor (now blocked) was promoting Kawasaki triples as having the first tailpiece from early 1970s, when I knew it was pre-dated by some five years (see Motorcycle fairing#Rear fairings). I've now written a small piece confirming the establishment of a US Kawasaki assembly facility at Lincoln, Nebraska#Automotive and technology, but not as yet checked the main Kawasaki articles for inclusion.
I also arranged File:Norton Commando Fastback 1969 cropped.JPG and c:Category:Motorcycle tail fairings. The Rickman fibreglass tail was available from 1964 (by Doug Mitchenall at Avon) but was actually called a mudguard. You can also see what (I think) Americans call a boat tail on H-D.
If you should see any book mention of the Commando Interstate Fastback tailpiece being a significant styling cue then I should be obliged as I haven't managed to find any so far. No urgency. rgds,
Rocknrollmancer (
talk)
12:59, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi John. I am trying to create the article Draft:JM Financial. It was created before by other users and deleted because it seemed to much like advertising. I have created a new version of it which is pretty much based on just factual contents of it. What can be done to make this seem like a company article rather than a promotional tone? - Imcdc ( talk) 12:25, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi John, I see you reviewed my article Walk the Sky 2.0 and apparently there's some things wrong with it 0(lack of information) I'm not sure what you meant by this. Could you provide me with more info on that? Oldsoirce ( talk) 17:38, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello John. In January, you moved 2022 IIHF World U18 Championship Division I to the draft. However, the championship is already underway so it's necessary to quickly return that draft into the mainspace. I've edited that draft today and I think it's ready. Thanks, Maiō T. ( talk) 12:04, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi John, I wish to request for you to review these articles for me: Inikiri Umuezeoka and Inikiri Bernard market. Thanks for your response. Topsy4men ( talk) 12:12, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi my respected brother how are you? I am asking for review Jhapa FC and others two article s. Salute good bless. MD Hydrogen 123 ( talk) 03:49, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi John,
Battle of Dachangyuan
Battle of Daohuigu
I have created these two articles but they have been sitting around for over a week now without anyone looking at them. If you have time, would you mind reviewing them? Thanks - Imcdc ( talk) 03:34, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Draft:English Folklore by Region, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:English Folklore by Region and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:English Folklore by Region during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Northernhenge ( talk) 10:33, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
You marked Sarıdanişment, Lalapaşa as patrolled, but I was wondering why. Clarification would be appreciated :) — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 12:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
By the way, thanks for submitting my draft article for review :) Urban Versis 32 ( talk) 23:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello John B123,
At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.
Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.
In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 805 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 855 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.
This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}}
on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself
here.
Sent 05:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 |
@ John B123, Can you elaborate on why this might not be notable? As someone who has access to South Asian TV channels and print media, the news is flooded with this for the last few days, so I looked up and there wasn't an article about it, hence I created one. In any case, if you could express your concerns, I would attempt to fix them. Tame ( talk) 14:52, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Why you delete article Jagat Mama so quick, I am working on that page to improve.
Now I want to work on that page, help. Qweasdzxc ( talk) 02:41, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Ok Qweasdzxc ( talk) 14:08, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I hope all is well on your end! I noticed you placed a notability tag on Monique Ryan, which I had accepted through AfC earlier. As her h-index demonstrates on her Google Scholar, she would be a definite pass of Wikipedia:Notability (academics) in my book, and many an editor who review academics would agree that would be the case, I believe. As noted in WP:PROF, " failure to meet either the general notability guideline or other subject-specific notability guidelines is irrelevant if an academic is notable under this WP:NPROF guideline.". Generally, I would say having over 100 citations in 5 peer-reviewed scientific journals is a pass, and this case it's over 20 publications, including 10 with over 200 citations, and 1 with 1000+. Please let me know if you feel comfortable with myself removing the tag based on this message. Thank you! nearlyevil 665 15:25, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello John, Thank you for your message ! I do not hide from you that I am a little disappointed... Couldn't there be a way to find a solution? Your advice will be precious... You will have understood it: I am not English and rather specialized in rugby for 10 years on Wiki. France ! To read to you. Best regards. MENUISERIE91 ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 18:26, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for looking over the stubs I added for Kharakhutulia and Nanhsiungchelys! Cheers, - TimTheDragonRider ( talk) 19:08, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
[ Malecomes ] this man is insulting me and falsifying my resources Aydın memmedov2000 ( talk) 22:06, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Hey John B123, this is Derivator2017 here, I guess you're familiar with me. Thanks for reviewing my recent article, just here to say that I really a appreciate you for reviewing my articles. It's always a pleasure to have your articles reviewed by a veteran editor. However, it apparently seems like not everyone enjoys seeing me on this platform. I have recently created an article, Yara International School and it was placed on AfD for the third time by the same editor under the pretext of notability, despite me providing around 70 references this time and out of which 3 to 4 sources clearly make the article eligible for existence. Kindly review my article and place your opinion in the deletion discussion page. Warm regards. Derivator2017 ( talk) 19:31, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing my articles Georg Gossembrot and Cultural depictions of Holy Emperor Maximilian I. Deamonpen ( talk) 10:42, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, you tagged the article History of the University of Southern California for deletion. Is the copyright issue from me blatantly copying the entire history section of the main article, University of Southern California, or is it because the person who wrote the history section of USC plagiarized from another source, thus me and whoever wrote USC’s history section are bth guilty of plaigiarism. As far as I know there aren’t any rules against copying from another editor on Wikipedia. LMK if there are.
PS I looked into the source I supposedly plagiarized from, and that source is a Wikipedia mirror, copying its contents from USC’s main wikipedia page. Would it be possible for you to remove the speedy deletion tag? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MLGDatBoi1738 ( talk • contribs) 19:01, 26 January 2022 (UTC) -MLGDatBoi1738 1/26/22 — Preceding unsigned comment added by MLGDatBoi1738 ( talk • contribs) 18:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
From what you say on here you are or were a new page reviewer with over 175K edits. Why are you questioning notability? Particularly when it's not hard to show you that you aren't right? Justanother2 ( talk) 22:29, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi John - hope you are well. Apologies for those tags - I thought two articles on the same topic created at different times (with different names) got tagged for merging? I'm not 100% ofay in this area, hence the mistake. Thanks! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello John,
Hope you are safe and well!
Thank you for taking the time to address this discussion. I want to apologize to all the Wikipedia users, if NABC Framework article looks promotional, it may be rewritten to be more encyclopedic. However, I strongly believe ( Need, Approach, Benefits, and Competition (NABC)) framework deserves a respectful place in Wikipedia since it has been recognized by leaders from various industries and a simple google search shows its prevalence. I am adding references from the academic and scientific world below to support my argument as it is a widely accepted practice that has shaped a lot of innovations. None of the references was used in the original article and I am sharing them to reflect the method's wide acceptance.
NABC framework has been instrumental in developing technologies such as Siri (now used by Apple), HDTV and robotics surgeries systems for creating value proposition framework. It is as powerful as Business Model Canvas and I strongly believe more people should have awareness of this methodology as it is well recognized by the scientific and academic community.
If you believe, this sounds like an advertisement, I am more than happy to rewrite the article. However, I sincerely request you to consider this article beyond the tonality. After considering the sources mentioned below, if you believe this article should not be on Wikipedia, I can rewrite and touch base with you before creating a new page and seek your valuable input.
Redvall E.N. (2018) Reaching Young Audiences Through Research: Using the NABC Method to Create the Norwegian Web Teenage Drama SKAM/Shame. In: Thornley D. (eds) True Event Adaptation. Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97322-7_8
H. J. LeBlanc and F. Hassan, "A spiral approach to teach value propositions using the NABC framework in core engineering courses," 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2017, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2017.8190583. URL: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=8190583&isnumber=8190427
Fang, Ting Yien, Sarva Mangala Praveena, Claire deBurbure, Ahmad Zaharin Aris, Sharifah Norkhadijah Syed Ismail, and Irniza Rasdi. "Analytical techniques for steroid estrogens in water samples-A review." Chemosphere 165 (2016): 358-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.051
Wee, S.Y. and Aris, A.Z., 2017. Endocrine disrupting compounds in drinking water supply system and human health risk implication. Environment international, 106, pp.207-233. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412016310182?via%3Dihub
Evelina Thiger, Lotta Woxblom & Anders Roos (2017) Empathic design for wood product innovation based on genuine customer needs – A test application on Swedish builders, Wood Material Science & Engineering, 12:3, 118-128, DOI: 10.1080/17480272.2015.1056226 https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2015.1056226
P. Rathod, V. Julkunen, T. Kaisti and J. Nissilä, "Automatic acceptance testing of the web application security with ITU-T X.805 framework," 2015 Second International Conference on Computer Science, Computer Engineering, and Social Media (CSCESM), 2015, pp. 103-108, doi: 10.1109/CSCESM.2015.7331876. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7331876
Thank you John! fi$her ( talk) 14:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
I understand your concern on this page. However, I am making efforts to give it the ideal outlook. However, if there is any information you deem to remove to give it the ideal outlook that will be appreciated. Meanwhile, kindly remove the mark for deletion you have put on it. Thank you. Ojifo's Raphael ( talk) 22:12, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
I will work on it in a few hours. Thank you. Ojifo's Raphael ( talk) 22:34, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi User:John B123 I saw you on recent edits and wondered if you could help. I am a new user and I wanted to create a redirect Snoochie Shy to BBC Radio 1Xtra as she is a presenter on the show. Could you please thanks Linda Binson ( talk) 23:16, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
I hope you don't delete the page. I worked on it for quite a while. It is pretty standard biography stuff that I gathered for Ramazan. He is a respected scholar and I think he deserves a page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WithAngelica ( talk • contribs) 16:32, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Excellent, very good. I am new at this so I appreciate your assistance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WithAngelica ( talk • contribs) 10:43, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Please accept this note as an invitation to participate in the discussion of this latest FAC nomination for the nonmetal article.
The context is that you were involved in the FAC 3 discussion for the article (which was not prompted) or you are an editor who made a recent edit to the nonmetal article.
Thank you. Sandbh ( talk) 07:19, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello! What's refimproves you want for this article? All necessary information provided by necessary refs, also I create Links block: it confirms information without refs. Some info doesn't need for confirmation, because easy for checking (it'r rule of Wikipedia), rest info with citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Эдуард91 ( talk • contribs) 20:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi, you tagged List of largest cities of U.S. states and territories by historical population with a refimprove and I was wondering what additional references you think should be added? The main source is the Census report that's ref'ed at the top of the page (1790 to 1990 data); the text notes that the rest of the numbers come from the respective census reports. — Carter (Tcr25) ( talk) 21:06, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi!
Where do you think that there is a need for more sources in the article "Critique of work".
It would be great to get your input since you seem to see something which I don't. Or you might just be keen on general improvement, which you're very welcome to contribute. : ) Thanks.
Pauloroboto ( talk) 08:45, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello!
I've added more sources now, and hope that you feel that it's enough, otherwise you're very welcome to put the template back in place, or add sources which you deem good.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Pauloroboto ( talk) 09:23, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
That's great to hear. Thank you very much for paying attention to this since it improved the article. Any contributions are very welcome in the future.
Pauloroboto ( talk) 10:13, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi, John B123 I think you tagged this entry as a stub. I made some improvements: added more information and cited new sources. Do you think the tag still applies? Thank you for your help! -- Sirionnd1118 ( talk) 12:34, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Thank you so much! -- Sirionnd1118 ( talk) 12:25, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I have posted a comment on the Administrators' noticeboard: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Jokkmokks-Goran
Regards, Jokkmokks-Goran ( talk) 22:46, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I'm DMC511. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, 2022 Purdue Boilermakers football team, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
DMC511 ( talk) 10:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi @John B123,
This is regarding Data Dynamic page and as i am new here dint know about this way of discussing. Kindly help me understand why was it not reverted? how can i fix the page for it to be published? — Preceding unsigned comment added by VikramFenix29 ( talk • contribs) 06:08, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I have posted another comment on the Administrators' noticeboard: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Jokkmokks-Goran Regards, Jokkmokks-Goran ( talk) 13:52, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi John B123, just wanted to thank you for the review of the Red Bull Racing RB18 page. Also wanted to ask, did you mark the page as "patrolled" so that the the page can be eligible for indexing by search engines? It's hidden on Google and not showing up! Thanks F1V8V10V6! 08:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
I made that article from the corresponding article in the 1900 Dictionary of National Biography ( 1), which is in the public domain, and I included full attribution indicating that the source being copied was in the public domain. Why did you summarily delete it without AfDing? Now I have to start it again from scratch... Ficaia ( talk) 20:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I noticed you put a banner on the top of the Quianu Robinson article that says it requires more citations for verification. Is this for the piece of the article that describes his time in office, the reference to Conrad Hilton, or the anecdote at the bottom explaining that he was in the Knights of Columbus? Any clarification would be appreciated. Frost.xyz ( talk) 00:34, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I see that you reviewed the above article, now at Trial of Neumann and Sass. The article has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2022 February 14, so should the page be set to unpatrolled until the copyvio is resolved? TSventon ( talk) 22:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Sir 2402:8100:2618:2DD8:5C06:4C10:E1AA:7C6D ( talk) 06:37, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello, John B123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Jabbar (actor)".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:49, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Please see Draft:Caroline Henry - de-enabled from mainspace some months ago. Looks like the 'new' version has been copy-pasted from the draft. This wikilawyering of allegedly-non-notable public servants who are publicly-elected is one area that WP gets wrong, IMO, particularly where there is an established sequence of elected incumbents (you'll perhaps remember Andy Abrahams). rgds, -- Rocknrollmancer ( talk) 21:38, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
I really like to edit on Wikipedia and to make new article. Wik250 ( talk) 21:08, 24 February 2022 (UTC) |
Hi John, please have a look at the page now. I have removed copied stuff, added more content and citations.
Can you remove the tags now? Dr. Hamza Ebrahim ( talk) 20:00, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi, please stop tagging obviously verifiable book stubs with a short bit of summary with "more footnotes". See WP:WHEN. You've twice now put the same maintenance tag on an article that has a single, clearly attributed short paragraph. It's not helpful. I can't add a citation to it that says anything other than what the text of the article already says. -- asilvering ( talk) 19:07, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists, and captions, must be verifiable ... must include an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material. I don't see anything in WP:WHEN that supports a list of general references. See also Wikipedia:Further reading:
Further reading is not a list of general references. -- John B123 ( talk) 19:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation. A summary is not a quotation, nor is it "likely to be challenged"; but furthermore, the material is cited, just not footnoted. Book articles do not regularly use footnotes in their summaries (see, for example, WP:PLOTSUM). Indeed, even the Good Article criteria do not require footnotes for this kind of paragraph. You are correct that further reading is not a list of general references; I am not sure why you think that is relevant to mention here. -- asilvering ( talk) 19:50, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
The lead paragraph of an article is not supposed to contain citationsNo idea why you would think that, see MOS:LEADCITE. The book itself would be a primary source, see Wikipedia:WHYN regarding the need for secondary sources. -- John B123 ( talk) 21:19, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
The verifiability policy advises that material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, and direct quotations, should be supported by an inline citation. Any statements about living persons that are challenged or likely to be challenged must have an inline citation every time they are mentioned, including within the lead.Again, basic information like "this is a book by this author" is not "challenged" or "a direct quotation". The book is indeed a primary source for its own text, and is acceptable as a source for summarizing its own contents. Here is the relevant guideline for novels, which is analogous to academic books in this way: WP:NOVELPLOT. -- asilvering ( talk) 21:31, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi John, thank you for reviewing my new page on the NIH Oxford-Cambridge Scholars Program. I saw where you added the "Primary Sources" template to the page, so I added some additional secondary sources. Do you have any other suggestions on improving the article's citations? Furthermore, do you think any additional work is needed for it to pass "New Page" review (it remains "unreviewed")? -- FlamingMoth ( talk) 03:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, you reviewed an article I created before: Red Bull Racing RB18. I wanted to ask you if you could review another article I created about an upcoming video game - World War 3 (video game). Could you please mark it as reviewed? Thanks. F1V8V10V6! 16:43, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi John. Are you reviewing new pages again? Saw your review log has been quite active in recently. - Imcdc ( talk) 16:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, John B123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " St Leonards Gardens".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:03, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Canoeing at the 2017 European Youth Summer Olympic Festival and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 2#Canoeing at the 2017 European Youth Summer Olympic Festival until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. CLalgo ( talk) 13:48, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Hook update | ||
Your hook reached 11,670 views (486.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2022 – nice work! |
the automation of this function is in beta testing mode—please let me know if I've screwed up! theleekycauldron ( talk • contribs) (she/ they) 23:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
On 8 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Antonette Wemyss Gorman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Antonette Wemyss Gorman (pictured), the first woman to fill a combat role in the Caribbean, was promoted to rear admiral and is Chief of Defence Staff of the Jamaica Defence Force? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Antonette Wemyss Gorman. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Antonette Wemyss Gorman), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:02, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your share in IWD! I show two who didn't make it, one from Russia and one from Ukraine. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:04, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Hook update | ||
Your hook reached 11,670 views (486.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2022 – nice work! |
the automation of this function is in beta testing mode—please let me know if I've screwed up! theleekycauldron ( talk • contribs) (she/ they) 06:30, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Gooday - hope all is well with you - I am lying in bed, unable to enjoy the mini-heatwave! Some years ago I tried to make changes to motorcycle fairing, particularly in that one difficult (supposed)-American editor (now blocked) was promoting Kawasaki triples as having the first tailpiece from early 1970s, when I knew it was pre-dated by some five years (see Motorcycle fairing#Rear fairings). I've now written a small piece confirming the establishment of a US Kawasaki assembly facility at Lincoln, Nebraska#Automotive and technology, but not as yet checked the main Kawasaki articles for inclusion.
I also arranged File:Norton Commando Fastback 1969 cropped.JPG and c:Category:Motorcycle tail fairings. The Rickman fibreglass tail was available from 1964 (by Doug Mitchenall at Avon) but was actually called a mudguard. You can also see what (I think) Americans call a boat tail on H-D.
If you should see any book mention of the Commando Interstate Fastback tailpiece being a significant styling cue then I should be obliged as I haven't managed to find any so far. No urgency. rgds,
Rocknrollmancer (
talk)
12:59, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi John. I am trying to create the article Draft:JM Financial. It was created before by other users and deleted because it seemed to much like advertising. I have created a new version of it which is pretty much based on just factual contents of it. What can be done to make this seem like a company article rather than a promotional tone? - Imcdc ( talk) 12:25, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi John, I see you reviewed my article Walk the Sky 2.0 and apparently there's some things wrong with it 0(lack of information) I'm not sure what you meant by this. Could you provide me with more info on that? Oldsoirce ( talk) 17:38, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello John. In January, you moved 2022 IIHF World U18 Championship Division I to the draft. However, the championship is already underway so it's necessary to quickly return that draft into the mainspace. I've edited that draft today and I think it's ready. Thanks, Maiō T. ( talk) 12:04, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi John, I wish to request for you to review these articles for me: Inikiri Umuezeoka and Inikiri Bernard market. Thanks for your response. Topsy4men ( talk) 12:12, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi my respected brother how are you? I am asking for review Jhapa FC and others two article s. Salute good bless. MD Hydrogen 123 ( talk) 03:49, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi John,
Battle of Dachangyuan
Battle of Daohuigu
I have created these two articles but they have been sitting around for over a week now without anyone looking at them. If you have time, would you mind reviewing them? Thanks - Imcdc ( talk) 03:34, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Draft:English Folklore by Region, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:English Folklore by Region and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:English Folklore by Region during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Northernhenge ( talk) 10:33, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
You marked Sarıdanişment, Lalapaşa as patrolled, but I was wondering why. Clarification would be appreciated :) — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 12:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
By the way, thanks for submitting my draft article for review :) Urban Versis 32 ( talk) 23:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello John B123,
At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.
Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.
In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 805 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 855 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.
This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}}
on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself
here.
Sent 05:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)