![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The second-ever GA Cup is now over! The competition officially ended Thursday. Congrats to everyone who participated, and especially to our finalists. The winner of the 2nd GA Cup is Zwerg Nase! He earned 408 points, over 100 points more than he earned in all previous rounds. He tied with our second-place winner, Sturmvogel 66 with 367 points, in number of articles reviewed (24), and they earned almost the same points for reviewing articles that were in the queue the longest (Zwerg with 322, Sturmvogel with 326). Basically, they tied in points, but what made the different for Zwerg was the advantage he had in reviewing longer articles. It seems that the rule change of earning more realistic points for longer articles made a difference. All of our contestants should be proud of the work they were able to accomplish through the GA Cup. Congrats to these worthy opponents! Our third and fourth place winners, Johanna and Tomandjerry211, also ran a close race, with 167 points and 147 points respectfully. We had one withdrawal; we found it interesting that competitors dropped out in Round 2 and 3 as well. One of the original judges and co-creator of this competition, User:Dom497 stepped down as judge during Round 3; as stated previously, we will miss his input and wish him the best. The judges were pleased with our results, even though fewer users competed this time compared to our inaugural competition. We recognize that this might be due to holding the competition during the summer months. We intend on looking more closely when we should conduct this contest, as well as other aspects of the GA Cup. We've set up a feedback page for everyone's input about how we should conduct the contest and what rule changes should be made. If you have any ideas about how we can improve things, please visit it and give us your input. Again, thanks to all and congratulations to our winners! Please stay tuned for the start of GA Cup #3. Cheers from 3family6, Figureskatingfan, Jaguar and MrWooHoo. |
The message was again sent without a timestamp, so bots won't archive it. I believe mass message tool warns you if there's no timestamp? — MusikAnimal talk 21:22, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jaguar,
Thank you again for your FAC review of the Frank Jenner article. The article has been promoted and I have nominated it to go up on the main page here.
Neelix ( talk) 17:47, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I have another basketball biography awaiting GA review (player name is Papa Oppong). I would appreciate it if you take a look...feel free to start the nomination if you want. TempleM ( talk) 17:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello Jaguar,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2/Editnotice for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. FallingGravity ( talk) 21:39, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Battlefield Germany you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
AdrianGamer --
AdrianGamer (
talk) 10:01, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
The article
Battlefield Germany you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Battlefield Germany for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
AdrianGamer --
AdrianGamer (
talk) 06:21, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, could you please see the Stefan Bonneau article and start the GA review if you want? Another user, Hansi667, has put in a lot of work into expanding it. TempleM ( talk) 15:13, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
I've nominated this article for FAC which also happens to be my first attempt. It is also the first Indian Telugu film article to be nominated for such status. If interested, please leave your comments here. All constructive comments are welcomed. Yours sincerely, Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 09:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Kailash29792 has nominated the article for FAC. Feel free to leave comments at its
FAC page.
—
Ssven2
Speak 2 me 09:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() | On 10 November 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Britain (video game), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Battle of Britain, a turn-based strategy video game, contains elements of first-person shooting? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Britain (video game). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:01, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Sorry to disturb you. Can you please review this article? Its quite small in size, and won't take much time. Yashthepunisher ( talk) 13:48, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jaguar. There is currently no content in this template. See Talk:Charles Houël du Petit Pré. Is it to come, or was this in error? Bests, Savvyjack23 ( talk) 23:50, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
{{
WikiProjectBannerShell}}
and putting project banners outside it; (iii) not setting |class=
when the other banners have it set consistently; (iv) adding an unnecessary newline before the closing double brace? See
this edit which exhibits all four problems. --
Redrose64 (
talk) 21:02, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
{{
WPAVIATION}}
so that it was after the {{
reqphoto}}
. There was no reason to do that, and no reason why you could not have simply put the new {{
WikiProject French Overseas Departments}}
in between {{
WPAVIATION}}
and {{
reqphoto}}
leaving both of those where they were. --
Redrose64 (
talk) 07:43, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, fellow member of the French Overseas Departments and Territories wikiproject. Just popping in to say hi. I noticed a potnetial similarity between your views about the EU and wikipedia. I would certainly agree about the EU but I perhaps do not know wikipedia governance well enough. Munci ( talk) 19:43, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
If you want to, please take a look at this weeks TAFI selected article, Marie Serneholt. Regards.-- BabbaQ ( talk) 21:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Why are you adding this category to articles that are already categorized in sub-categories of Geography of Queen Maud Land? - 4ing ( talk) 13:59, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
On second thought, I originally thought that placing all articles in one big category would be helpful to myself for tagging projects, however now that everything is finished I think the categories are redundant and should be removed per Wikipedia:Categorization#Categorizing pages. It's redundant to have a main "geography of the Ross Dependency" whereas it already has sub-categories. Unless anybody disagrees, I'll begin removing the redundant categories now. I'll link back here if anyone questions why I'm mass-removing everything. JAG UAR 18:28, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Can't you see that the talkpages are already tagged with low importance? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 20:58, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
stub
to Stub
is pointless, the values fed into |class=
are case-insensitive. Adding |importance=low
before an empty |importance=
is also pointless, since the second overrides the first and the page remains in
Category:Unknown-importance French Overseas Departments articles - it is not added to
Category:Low-importance French Overseas Departments articles; but it also means that the page ends up in
Category:Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls. Are you still omitting the
WP:PREVIEW step? --
Redrose64 (
talk) 00:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)|importance=low
sometimes. To counter this I program AWB to skip all pages with "importance=low" already set, and last night it automatically skipped over 1000 so I assumed it worked. I don't know why it still makes errors especially when I make several attempts to safeguard it.
JAG
UAR 14:43, 24 November 2015 (UTC)I see that you're back. I've nominated the article for FAC. Since you'd copy-edited it, you might be interested in reviewing it. Thanks, — Vensatry (Talk) 17:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
are you actually checking before you do anything on AWB? At 20 to 15 edits a minute, are you sure you are getting it right?
Maluku is in Indonesia, and is not in Guam territory. Please, dont just promise to mend your ways with AWB (like the talk item above), slow downand look at what you are doing. JarrahTree 00:24, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to WikiProject United States Territories. The aim of this project is to bring together editors working on articles related to the current sixteen Territories of the United States - there is nothing about the HISTORIC Spanish east indies (1890s to 1940s) being something current. Your are rapidly adding a contemporary project tag on a historical subject. PLEASE do something about you AWB editing. Before someone blocks you. JarrahTree 00:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Just asking, but what does Little America have to do with New Zealand? Herostratus ( talk) 18:52, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Folklore Museum of Velventos. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. - PanchoS ( talk) 02:34, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jaguar! I've reverted some of the tags you added to articles that I don't think are relevant to the project. Specifically, the articles are about multilateral treaties that are extended to British Overseas Territories. Regards, – Zntrip 22:09, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
I've been resolving the actual location of "Rawson Plateau" in Antarctica (Admiral Byrd mentions it in his book "Alone") -- and I want to gather up a scrapbook for my buddy - his son.
His father always 'treated me 'right' back when I called for his son Ken at home back in the '70s (when we were High School) - perhaps he knew of my Dad (being USNR in WWII & Korea)...or I just acted right.
Gathering the facts and the history of real heroes - especially when you know / of them...even if you did not really know way back then -- is gratifying. Pulling this together for KLR (Junior) on his 60th in January will be a treat.
Any further details and/or sources you could recommend would be appreciated. Sincerely 205.167.170.19 ( talk) 16:36, 16 November 2015 (UTC) Michael McCrave (mccrave6002@verizon.net)
| Hello, Jaguar. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Jumping Flash! at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 ( talk) 19:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC) |
![]() | On 21 November 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pssst, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a retrospective review of Pssst noted that its graphics were a significant improvement over those of previous games for the ZX Spectrum? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pssst. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:02, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello Jaguar,
Just being curious: why do you first add pages to the category 'Geography of the British Antarctic Territory' and now say this category is redundant and revert all your contributions? Kind regards, Coldbolt ( talk) 18:40, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
A cup of tea for you from Kurdistan. :) Serchia ( talk) 16:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
...completely different! ;) Hey Jag, I suspect this is a little outside of your wheelhouse, but would you mind taking a look at my latest FAC? It failed last time, only because no one reviewed it. I'd really like for it to fail again for the same reason, so I'm canvassing (not really) my buddies here to help out. I'd appreciate it. Don't know if you celebrate Thanksgiving, but if so, I hope yours was as nice as mine. If not, best to you anyway. Christine (Figureskatingfan) ( talk) 17:00, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jaguar! Since you have already reviewed several basketball bios, I was wondering if you could review Malcolm Grant's GAN. It's queued for more than 6 months. Thanks. Hansi667 (Neighbor Of The Beast) a penny for your thoughts? 10:38, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jaguar. It has been a really long tryst with GA nominations from me and this happens to be my 20th. Would you like to review it?
Pavanjandhyala (
talk) 05:38, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.
Buster Seven Talk 14:22, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The second-ever GA Cup is now over! The competition officially ended Thursday. Congrats to everyone who participated, and especially to our finalists. The winner of the 2nd GA Cup is Zwerg Nase! He earned 408 points, over 100 points more than he earned in all previous rounds. He tied with our second-place winner, Sturmvogel 66 with 367 points, in number of articles reviewed (24), and they earned almost the same points for reviewing articles that were in the queue the longest (Zwerg with 322, Sturmvogel with 326). Basically, they tied in points, but what made the different for Zwerg was the advantage he had in reviewing longer articles. It seems that the rule change of earning more realistic points for longer articles made a difference. All of our contestants should be proud of the work they were able to accomplish through the GA Cup. Congrats to these worthy opponents! Our third and fourth place winners, Johanna and Tomandjerry211, also ran a close race, with 167 points and 147 points respectfully. We had one withdrawal; we found it interesting that competitors dropped out in Round 2 and 3 as well. One of the original judges and co-creator of this competition, User:Dom497 stepped down as judge during Round 3; as stated previously, we will miss his input and wish him the best. The judges were pleased with our results, even though fewer users competed this time compared to our inaugural competition. We recognize that this might be due to holding the competition during the summer months. We intend on looking more closely when we should conduct this contest, as well as other aspects of the GA Cup. We've set up a feedback page for everyone's input about how we should conduct the contest and what rule changes should be made. If you have any ideas about how we can improve things, please visit it and give us your input. Again, thanks to all and congratulations to our winners! Please stay tuned for the start of GA Cup #3. Cheers from 3family6, Figureskatingfan, Jaguar and MrWooHoo. |
The message was again sent without a timestamp, so bots won't archive it. I believe mass message tool warns you if there's no timestamp? — MusikAnimal talk 21:22, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jaguar,
Thank you again for your FAC review of the Frank Jenner article. The article has been promoted and I have nominated it to go up on the main page here.
Neelix ( talk) 17:47, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I have another basketball biography awaiting GA review (player name is Papa Oppong). I would appreciate it if you take a look...feel free to start the nomination if you want. TempleM ( talk) 17:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello Jaguar,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2/Editnotice for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. FallingGravity ( talk) 21:39, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Battlefield Germany you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
AdrianGamer --
AdrianGamer (
talk) 10:01, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
The article
Battlefield Germany you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Battlefield Germany for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
AdrianGamer --
AdrianGamer (
talk) 06:21, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, could you please see the Stefan Bonneau article and start the GA review if you want? Another user, Hansi667, has put in a lot of work into expanding it. TempleM ( talk) 15:13, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
I've nominated this article for FAC which also happens to be my first attempt. It is also the first Indian Telugu film article to be nominated for such status. If interested, please leave your comments here. All constructive comments are welcomed. Yours sincerely, Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 09:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Kailash29792 has nominated the article for FAC. Feel free to leave comments at its
FAC page.
—
Ssven2
Speak 2 me 09:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() | On 10 November 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Britain (video game), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Battle of Britain, a turn-based strategy video game, contains elements of first-person shooting? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Britain (video game). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:01, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Sorry to disturb you. Can you please review this article? Its quite small in size, and won't take much time. Yashthepunisher ( talk) 13:48, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jaguar. There is currently no content in this template. See Talk:Charles Houël du Petit Pré. Is it to come, or was this in error? Bests, Savvyjack23 ( talk) 23:50, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
{{
WikiProjectBannerShell}}
and putting project banners outside it; (iii) not setting |class=
when the other banners have it set consistently; (iv) adding an unnecessary newline before the closing double brace? See
this edit which exhibits all four problems. --
Redrose64 (
talk) 21:02, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
{{
WPAVIATION}}
so that it was after the {{
reqphoto}}
. There was no reason to do that, and no reason why you could not have simply put the new {{
WikiProject French Overseas Departments}}
in between {{
WPAVIATION}}
and {{
reqphoto}}
leaving both of those where they were. --
Redrose64 (
talk) 07:43, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, fellow member of the French Overseas Departments and Territories wikiproject. Just popping in to say hi. I noticed a potnetial similarity between your views about the EU and wikipedia. I would certainly agree about the EU but I perhaps do not know wikipedia governance well enough. Munci ( talk) 19:43, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
If you want to, please take a look at this weeks TAFI selected article, Marie Serneholt. Regards.-- BabbaQ ( talk) 21:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Why are you adding this category to articles that are already categorized in sub-categories of Geography of Queen Maud Land? - 4ing ( talk) 13:59, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
On second thought, I originally thought that placing all articles in one big category would be helpful to myself for tagging projects, however now that everything is finished I think the categories are redundant and should be removed per Wikipedia:Categorization#Categorizing pages. It's redundant to have a main "geography of the Ross Dependency" whereas it already has sub-categories. Unless anybody disagrees, I'll begin removing the redundant categories now. I'll link back here if anyone questions why I'm mass-removing everything. JAG UAR 18:28, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Can't you see that the talkpages are already tagged with low importance? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 20:58, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
stub
to Stub
is pointless, the values fed into |class=
are case-insensitive. Adding |importance=low
before an empty |importance=
is also pointless, since the second overrides the first and the page remains in
Category:Unknown-importance French Overseas Departments articles - it is not added to
Category:Low-importance French Overseas Departments articles; but it also means that the page ends up in
Category:Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls. Are you still omitting the
WP:PREVIEW step? --
Redrose64 (
talk) 00:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)|importance=low
sometimes. To counter this I program AWB to skip all pages with "importance=low" already set, and last night it automatically skipped over 1000 so I assumed it worked. I don't know why it still makes errors especially when I make several attempts to safeguard it.
JAG
UAR 14:43, 24 November 2015 (UTC)I see that you're back. I've nominated the article for FAC. Since you'd copy-edited it, you might be interested in reviewing it. Thanks, — Vensatry (Talk) 17:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
are you actually checking before you do anything on AWB? At 20 to 15 edits a minute, are you sure you are getting it right?
Maluku is in Indonesia, and is not in Guam territory. Please, dont just promise to mend your ways with AWB (like the talk item above), slow downand look at what you are doing. JarrahTree 00:24, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to WikiProject United States Territories. The aim of this project is to bring together editors working on articles related to the current sixteen Territories of the United States - there is nothing about the HISTORIC Spanish east indies (1890s to 1940s) being something current. Your are rapidly adding a contemporary project tag on a historical subject. PLEASE do something about you AWB editing. Before someone blocks you. JarrahTree 00:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Just asking, but what does Little America have to do with New Zealand? Herostratus ( talk) 18:52, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Folklore Museum of Velventos. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. - PanchoS ( talk) 02:34, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jaguar! I've reverted some of the tags you added to articles that I don't think are relevant to the project. Specifically, the articles are about multilateral treaties that are extended to British Overseas Territories. Regards, – Zntrip 22:09, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
I've been resolving the actual location of "Rawson Plateau" in Antarctica (Admiral Byrd mentions it in his book "Alone") -- and I want to gather up a scrapbook for my buddy - his son.
His father always 'treated me 'right' back when I called for his son Ken at home back in the '70s (when we were High School) - perhaps he knew of my Dad (being USNR in WWII & Korea)...or I just acted right.
Gathering the facts and the history of real heroes - especially when you know / of them...even if you did not really know way back then -- is gratifying. Pulling this together for KLR (Junior) on his 60th in January will be a treat.
Any further details and/or sources you could recommend would be appreciated. Sincerely 205.167.170.19 ( talk) 16:36, 16 November 2015 (UTC) Michael McCrave (mccrave6002@verizon.net)
| Hello, Jaguar. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Jumping Flash! at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 ( talk) 19:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC) |
![]() | On 21 November 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pssst, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a retrospective review of Pssst noted that its graphics were a significant improvement over those of previous games for the ZX Spectrum? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pssst. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:02, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello Jaguar,
Just being curious: why do you first add pages to the category 'Geography of the British Antarctic Territory' and now say this category is redundant and revert all your contributions? Kind regards, Coldbolt ( talk) 18:40, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
A cup of tea for you from Kurdistan. :) Serchia ( talk) 16:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
...completely different! ;) Hey Jag, I suspect this is a little outside of your wheelhouse, but would you mind taking a look at my latest FAC? It failed last time, only because no one reviewed it. I'd really like for it to fail again for the same reason, so I'm canvassing (not really) my buddies here to help out. I'd appreciate it. Don't know if you celebrate Thanksgiving, but if so, I hope yours was as nice as mine. If not, best to you anyway. Christine (Figureskatingfan) ( talk) 17:00, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jaguar! Since you have already reviewed several basketball bios, I was wondering if you could review Malcolm Grant's GAN. It's queued for more than 6 months. Thanks. Hansi667 (Neighbor Of The Beast) a penny for your thoughts? 10:38, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jaguar. It has been a really long tryst with GA nominations from me and this happens to be my 20th. Would you like to review it?
Pavanjandhyala (
talk) 05:38, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.
Buster Seven Talk 14:22, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |