This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Hi, JJMC89 while patrolling against vandalism I came across an edit that I found as unsourced see here so I reverted. I also placed a {{ subst:uw-unsourced2}} as per norms. But as per history the person still added unsourced data see here. See the warning list on his User_talk:Raje_Ranveer. Now the guy is threatening all the persons who have placed warnings see evidence [1], [2]. Please suggest what to do. Thank you. Amkgp ( talk) 06:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi - I'm not sure whether I should be raising this here, at the Admins noticeboard, or not at all! Figured I'd come here first as you've had engagement with this user already. Please could you check out its edit summaries & its insistence on calling others editors dumb & lacking brain cells.
Examples: Diff Diff Diff Diff Diff Diff
Doesn't look like it's here to build an encyclopedia to me , but then I'm new(ish), so it might be standard. Thank you! -- DSQ ( talk) 11:48, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi you recently deleted a new page The Speakmans TV Show , i’m wondering what part you deemed copy-write , is there anything i could change ? this is my first article Thank you 82.25.90.58 ( talk) 08:54, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disruptive forumshopping by Nehme1499. . -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 02:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Regarding this SPI, Venue9 has been blocked only for his poor editing and would get unblocked if he promises to change his ways but if SPI has been concluded then he would need to appeal from his main account. So can you reopen SPI for further investigation? Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 06:04, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your actions at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Khadim ahlesunnah waljamaah. But please could you also merge Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anatomycbmcb/Archive into this case, and add Anatomy iggmc to the list of sockpuppets of Khadim ahlesunnah waljamaah.
Anatomy iggmc was blocked as a sockpuppet of Anatomycbmcb on 10 April 2020. But we now know that Anatomycbmcb is a sockpuppet of Khadim ahlesunnah waljamaah.-- Toddy1 (talk) 05:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
I added them back to the article. The poster for Kipo and the Age of Wonderbeasts and the cover of the first volume of Princess Knight of fulfill the requirements of minimal use, and the use of the content increases "readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding," so please do not remove those images again, especially since I have created justifications for the use of those images. Every NFCC image I have used has a justification in keeping with Wikipedia's rules.-- Historyday01 ( talk) 17:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Just as a comment to JJMC89, its fine to remove images you think will quick fail NFCC, but I would strongly recommend not removing the rationale added to file pages to support their inclusion, at least as immediately as you did in some of these cases. There's no harm to extra, unused rationales on file pages, and this allows the image use or removal on that page to be discussed. After a few months, if no challenge has some and the image isn't then used on the page, then removing extra rationales is fine, but would be low-priority cleanup. -- Masem ( t) 13:57, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Discussion about a page (article, file, etc.) belongs on that page's talk page, not here.
|
---|
After giving further justification of this image, and reducing the number of NFCC items on the History of LGBTQ characters in animated series: 2010s page from six to five, ensuring I am following the rule on minimal usage of NFCC images, I am also following what it says on /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Non-free_content_criteria#Enforcement, where it says that "A file with a valid non-free-use rationale for some (but not all) articles it is used in will not be deleted. Instead, the file should be removed from the articles for which it lacks a non-free-use rationale, or a suitable rationale added. A file on which non-free use is claimed that is not used in any article (criterion 7) may be deleted seven days after notification. **A file in use in an article and uploaded after 13 July 2006 that does not comply with this policy 48 hours after notification to the uploading editor will be deleted. To avoid deletion, the uploading editor or another Wikipedian will need to provide a convincing non-free-use defense that satisfies all 10 criteria. For a file in use in an article that was uploaded before 13 July 2006, the 48-hour period is extended to seven days.**" For "[File:Princess Knight-1.jpg|thumb|left|180px|alt=Princess Knight cover|Cover for the first volume of Princess Knight from the Osamu Tezuka Manga Complete Works edition]" on the History of LGBTQ characters in animated series page...
For "[File:Kipo and the Age of Wonderbeasts.png|thumb|right|180px|alt=Kipo Season 1 promotional poster|Promotional poster for Season 1 of Kipo and the Age of Wonderbeasts.]" on the History of LGBTQ characters in animated series page
This cites five sources, which are as follows:
For "[File:Poemy ad.jpg|thumb|right|180px|alt=ADV ad for Puni Puni Poemi.|Puni Puni Poemy was advertised in North America as a successor to Excel Saga.]" on the History of LGBTQ characters in animated series: 2000s page,
As such, the lack of its presence would decrease the understanding of readers of the article topic, with its omission detrimental to its understanding. If I could find a better image, I would, but it seems to serve the purpose of the importance of the show as a whole, relating to the article itself.
For "[File:queerduck.png|thumb|left|180px|alt=Opening screen for episodes.|Opening splash screen for Queer Duck episodes.]" on the History of LGBTQ characters in animated series: 2000s page,
The two sources are:
If I could have used another image, I would have, but this is one of the only images of the show on Wikipedia, so I thought it would be a good way to make the article more interactive and increase interest in a show which moved forward LGBTQ representation in animation.
I think that's about it. This while form of justification seems extremely unnecessary, but be that as it may, I hope this helps you reconsider your decision to remove the content, allowing me to bring it back. I thought this was at least worth a shot, even though I expect it is unlikely you will change your mind. Historyday01 ( talk) 20:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC) Jeez, you removed the other five NFCC images I had too. I spent a long time on those justifications but it doesn't matter to anyone like you. Don't you have a life except when removing NFCC images, which is a good portion of your contributions? That's basically all your bot does. I mean, seriously. I could write justifications for those too, but I'm not sure its even worth it because you'll just take them down again.-- Historyday01 ( talk) 23:17, 5 May 2020 (UTC) Just in case you don’t have the article in question on your watch list, Historyday01 left a personal attack against you in an edit summary. – 2. O. Boxing 23:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
|
JJMC89, after getting some comments from the media copyright forum, I'm just going to give up. Feel free to delete those images, I literally don't care anymore. Its not worth my time to fight what you are doing. I'll just lose anyway, so whatever. Just know that people like you are the reason I am terrified to add any NFCC images to any of the articles I edit ever again, afraid you will tag them as "violations." Historyday01 ( talk) 13:04, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
I'm trying to work on the page Mount & Blade in my sandbox, but the cover art for the game is not free, meaning that the bot continually deletes the images and I have to re-add them in. Can you stop the bot from deleting non-free images in sandboxes and user pages? Thank you, Aven13 17:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for fixing bot template on Analogue Bubblebath; sorry for being careless and causing you to repeat yourself. Cambial Yellowing ❧ 14:06, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Please tell me where to place this request, which you said is a "misplaced" item? Thanks in advance. Pi314m ( talk) 08:11, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
After deleting parts of random pages, please fix the formatting of the page. It looks horrible when you delete certain pieces and leave the rest intact without accounting for the deleted parts. Nicholemacgregor ( talk) 00:03, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
Can you please advise on why you felt the Guild of British Camera Technicians page was about an organisation that was not notable? It was my first submission and I thought I'd done a decent job to take have it deleted is a little deflating but I can take it! Some feedback from an experienced Wiki user such as yourself would be massively appreciated.
Is it possible to have it reinstated in some form that I can improve it? I used the GBFTE page as a guide to the sort of content that a) Wiki and b) the sector would be interested in and having read the various pages around Notability I think I can probably prove that the GBCT is a notable organistation.
Thanks in advance.
HMCLSPLYL2020 ( talk) 10:02, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Can you please disable your bot from requesting reduction for File:The World of Harry Potter 4 Pack.jpg. The file only reduces by 5KB and makes the text in the image difficult to read. -- Osh33m ( talk) 01:36, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89, made very significant changes to a page you tagged as advertorial in the past. Would appreciate if you could take a look and approve. Best, Pratat ( talk) 13:19, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
I am curious as to why you are saying I did not provide any evidence in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MarnetteD#Suspected sockpuppets when I gave you all of the diffs from the start which include the named user not reverting but editing the article using the exact same wording that is in dispute and a discussion going on through the talk page? Thank you. Galendalia CVU Member \ Chat Me Up 08:12, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
It looks like something didn't work when you deleted File:Icons of Filth artwork from the album Onward Christian Soldiers.jpg per the FfD. I don't see the image but I do see "(223 × 223 pixels, file size: 18 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)" and the file history table. The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 04:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89, could you and your bot move Category:Railway stations in China by opening year to Category:Railway stations in China by year of opening as was done for the other subcategories of Category:Railway stations by year of opening relating to Canada, Russia and the United States please. Hugo999 ( talk) 09:15, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
I have just listed [3] the category at WP:CFDS, for renaming as originally proposed by User:Hugo999 in the discussion. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 22:26, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I do not believe it was the right decision to decline the histmerge of Laal Singh Chaddha and I have good reasons for disagreeing with your choice. First, my draft version of this article was created on September 16, 2019, over a month before the separate mainspace article was created on October 31, 2019. Second, User:CAP202, the creator of the mainspace article, clearly copy and pasted the information from my draft into his separate mainspace article. This user is also a band sockpuppet of User:PankhilSen. I find it very distressing that a clear act of vandalism, brought on by a known sock puppet, is not being dealt with or fixed in any meaningful way. I highly suggest in some action against this matter, as I started this article first. Cardei012597 ( talk) 04:27, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
You removed an image I added to the page John Prentice (cartoonist), yet you have let it stand on the Young Romance page, even though I sourced the same file they did. Please explain. Packer1028 ( talk) 21:04, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Hallo JJMC87, if you look at the official website www.salemkolleg.de you will see that the logo is correct. Could you please explain why you deleted it? Thanks, -- Baekemm ( talk) 13:53, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Hey JJMC89, hope you are well and safe. Would it be possible to revoke talk page access for 2600:1700:F660:4430:0:0:0:0/64 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log)? Theyhave been vandalizing their talk page after their block. Thank you! -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
@ JJMC89: - Hello! I saw that your "JJMC89 bot III" has gone through pages moving them from the category "Media companies" to "Mass media companies". I see that request on Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Speedy, but I am curious - was there any discussion of this change anywhere? I'm just curious to learn more about the rationale. Any pointers to discussion would be appreciated. Thanks. - Dyork ( talk) 15:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, @JJMC89. I'm curious as to why the subcategory I created was deleted? There is a subcategory for "Literature by women," so gender-based subcategories for types of literature have precedent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lmstevens5947 ( talk • contribs) 14:10, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I was reviewing Draft:Stjepan Glavač and I noticed you deleted the mainspace article, Stjepan Glavač, under G5. Would you mind checking if the draft has the same content as the deleted article? He looks notable but I don't want to accept a sock draft. Thanks, SpicyMilkBoy ( talk) 12:46, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Comparison of Nikon DSLR cameras. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Runnerphil712 ( talk • contribs) 18:58, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
I'm curious about this edit of yours. I had made it a redirect because that's what Callanecc suggested I do. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:36, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi there! Just wondering, but if these two users are the same person, should Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Atomic Meltdown/Archive be merged into the other one? BOZ ( talk) 02:51, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. Since you’re an SPI clerk as well as an admin, perhaps you could take a look at this. The suspected sock is still soft-blocked and the suspected master hasn’t edit in about a week. Moreover, the local file that was being deleted has been deleted per F7 and Commons’ version is currently being discussed at a Commons DR. So, if you feel that there‘s really no need for any admin action here (except perhaps for just a warning if anything), I’m fine with having the SPI closed as such. — Marchjuly ( talk) 03:25, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Some of the {{ wikinews}} variants have been merged into the main template. I wasn't sure what you wanted to do with User:JJMC89 bot/Wikinews importer so I thought I'd let you know about the changes so you could update it appropriately. Primefac ( talk) 00:40, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Please delete the Xǔ (state) redirect page and change or move the Xu (Henan) to Xǔ (state) no redirect and only one page. Thank you! K.b.cheng ( talk) 10:17, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
HI, last week I sent a request to rejoin the ACC team after being denied for not having enough edits, This has since been fixed. I have head from some other tool admins that it was received, but nothing else. Is there a problem, or does it just take some time, Is there a backlog? I am not trying to be impatient, just curious. Thanks,{{u|
wylie39}} {
Talk}
18:59, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
{{u|
wylie39}} {
Talk}
17:00, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Please block emet77 and add this account to latest sockpuppet account of peteski32
On May 18, he continues to advocate for mercilessly attacking the biography of Pat Day on the Pat Day talk page
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Peteski132/Archive
/info/en/?search=Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Peteski132 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:6C3:4081:A10:9D29:1D47:575C:D9BD ( talk) 03:22, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
I want to create a page about this referee but it see it has extended-confirmed-protected and can be edited only by extended confirmed users. Can you fix it? -- 196.119.95.98 ( talk) 12:07, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
I moved the page without moving the history and am sorry. Kindly merge the history of the page. Thank you. -- TamilMirchi —Preceding undated comment added 19:54, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Being a moderator, you always checked my page List of Pakistani Peace Laureates and fixed the errors every time for which I was always thankful to you for your support and cooperation but today I just checked my page and have found some other moderator removing the descriptions and ruining my entire page. All my efforts and struggle have been ruined. Nawab Afridi ( talk) 17:09, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Why was this category not moved to Category:Deaths from the COVID-19 pandemic in Indiana? Only this category was missing. -- Francisco ( talk) 18:15, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your edits to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PKHilliam.
Now I am confused. Do you want me to supply more diffs or what? Basically, PKHilliam would unilaterally change links from uncyclopedia.co to uncyclopedia.ca. I wanted to act fast before this case becomes stale, but I can provide more evidence if needed. :) A a s i m 05:42, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
In addition, please move Category:Hospitals in Paraná to Category:Hospitals in Paraná (state), like other subcategories in Category:Paraná (state). Thanks. -- Francisco ( talk) 17:24, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
This bot is repeatedly removing an image from the page VanossGaming even after it was resized to match the Wikipedia guidelines. The image being removed is File:EvanFong.png. Delta fiver ( talk) (UTC) 07:15, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89, I want to know how to add an image hosted on non-English Wikipedia to English Wikipedia articles. Thank you TheBirdsShedTears ( talk) 08:02, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Hi, JJMC89 while patrolling against vandalism I came across an edit that I found as unsourced see here so I reverted. I also placed a {{ subst:uw-unsourced2}} as per norms. But as per history the person still added unsourced data see here. See the warning list on his User_talk:Raje_Ranveer. Now the guy is threatening all the persons who have placed warnings see evidence [1], [2]. Please suggest what to do. Thank you. Amkgp ( talk) 06:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi - I'm not sure whether I should be raising this here, at the Admins noticeboard, or not at all! Figured I'd come here first as you've had engagement with this user already. Please could you check out its edit summaries & its insistence on calling others editors dumb & lacking brain cells.
Examples: Diff Diff Diff Diff Diff Diff
Doesn't look like it's here to build an encyclopedia to me , but then I'm new(ish), so it might be standard. Thank you! -- DSQ ( talk) 11:48, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi you recently deleted a new page The Speakmans TV Show , i’m wondering what part you deemed copy-write , is there anything i could change ? this is my first article Thank you 82.25.90.58 ( talk) 08:54, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disruptive forumshopping by Nehme1499. . -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 02:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Regarding this SPI, Venue9 has been blocked only for his poor editing and would get unblocked if he promises to change his ways but if SPI has been concluded then he would need to appeal from his main account. So can you reopen SPI for further investigation? Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 06:04, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your actions at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Khadim ahlesunnah waljamaah. But please could you also merge Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anatomycbmcb/Archive into this case, and add Anatomy iggmc to the list of sockpuppets of Khadim ahlesunnah waljamaah.
Anatomy iggmc was blocked as a sockpuppet of Anatomycbmcb on 10 April 2020. But we now know that Anatomycbmcb is a sockpuppet of Khadim ahlesunnah waljamaah.-- Toddy1 (talk) 05:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
I added them back to the article. The poster for Kipo and the Age of Wonderbeasts and the cover of the first volume of Princess Knight of fulfill the requirements of minimal use, and the use of the content increases "readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding," so please do not remove those images again, especially since I have created justifications for the use of those images. Every NFCC image I have used has a justification in keeping with Wikipedia's rules.-- Historyday01 ( talk) 17:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Just as a comment to JJMC89, its fine to remove images you think will quick fail NFCC, but I would strongly recommend not removing the rationale added to file pages to support their inclusion, at least as immediately as you did in some of these cases. There's no harm to extra, unused rationales on file pages, and this allows the image use or removal on that page to be discussed. After a few months, if no challenge has some and the image isn't then used on the page, then removing extra rationales is fine, but would be low-priority cleanup. -- Masem ( t) 13:57, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Discussion about a page (article, file, etc.) belongs on that page's talk page, not here.
|
---|
After giving further justification of this image, and reducing the number of NFCC items on the History of LGBTQ characters in animated series: 2010s page from six to five, ensuring I am following the rule on minimal usage of NFCC images, I am also following what it says on /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Non-free_content_criteria#Enforcement, where it says that "A file with a valid non-free-use rationale for some (but not all) articles it is used in will not be deleted. Instead, the file should be removed from the articles for which it lacks a non-free-use rationale, or a suitable rationale added. A file on which non-free use is claimed that is not used in any article (criterion 7) may be deleted seven days after notification. **A file in use in an article and uploaded after 13 July 2006 that does not comply with this policy 48 hours after notification to the uploading editor will be deleted. To avoid deletion, the uploading editor or another Wikipedian will need to provide a convincing non-free-use defense that satisfies all 10 criteria. For a file in use in an article that was uploaded before 13 July 2006, the 48-hour period is extended to seven days.**" For "[File:Princess Knight-1.jpg|thumb|left|180px|alt=Princess Knight cover|Cover for the first volume of Princess Knight from the Osamu Tezuka Manga Complete Works edition]" on the History of LGBTQ characters in animated series page...
For "[File:Kipo and the Age of Wonderbeasts.png|thumb|right|180px|alt=Kipo Season 1 promotional poster|Promotional poster for Season 1 of Kipo and the Age of Wonderbeasts.]" on the History of LGBTQ characters in animated series page
This cites five sources, which are as follows:
For "[File:Poemy ad.jpg|thumb|right|180px|alt=ADV ad for Puni Puni Poemi.|Puni Puni Poemy was advertised in North America as a successor to Excel Saga.]" on the History of LGBTQ characters in animated series: 2000s page,
As such, the lack of its presence would decrease the understanding of readers of the article topic, with its omission detrimental to its understanding. If I could find a better image, I would, but it seems to serve the purpose of the importance of the show as a whole, relating to the article itself.
For "[File:queerduck.png|thumb|left|180px|alt=Opening screen for episodes.|Opening splash screen for Queer Duck episodes.]" on the History of LGBTQ characters in animated series: 2000s page,
The two sources are:
If I could have used another image, I would have, but this is one of the only images of the show on Wikipedia, so I thought it would be a good way to make the article more interactive and increase interest in a show which moved forward LGBTQ representation in animation.
I think that's about it. This while form of justification seems extremely unnecessary, but be that as it may, I hope this helps you reconsider your decision to remove the content, allowing me to bring it back. I thought this was at least worth a shot, even though I expect it is unlikely you will change your mind. Historyday01 ( talk) 20:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC) Jeez, you removed the other five NFCC images I had too. I spent a long time on those justifications but it doesn't matter to anyone like you. Don't you have a life except when removing NFCC images, which is a good portion of your contributions? That's basically all your bot does. I mean, seriously. I could write justifications for those too, but I'm not sure its even worth it because you'll just take them down again.-- Historyday01 ( talk) 23:17, 5 May 2020 (UTC) Just in case you don’t have the article in question on your watch list, Historyday01 left a personal attack against you in an edit summary. – 2. O. Boxing 23:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
|
JJMC89, after getting some comments from the media copyright forum, I'm just going to give up. Feel free to delete those images, I literally don't care anymore. Its not worth my time to fight what you are doing. I'll just lose anyway, so whatever. Just know that people like you are the reason I am terrified to add any NFCC images to any of the articles I edit ever again, afraid you will tag them as "violations." Historyday01 ( talk) 13:04, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
I'm trying to work on the page Mount & Blade in my sandbox, but the cover art for the game is not free, meaning that the bot continually deletes the images and I have to re-add them in. Can you stop the bot from deleting non-free images in sandboxes and user pages? Thank you, Aven13 17:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for fixing bot template on Analogue Bubblebath; sorry for being careless and causing you to repeat yourself. Cambial Yellowing ❧ 14:06, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Please tell me where to place this request, which you said is a "misplaced" item? Thanks in advance. Pi314m ( talk) 08:11, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
After deleting parts of random pages, please fix the formatting of the page. It looks horrible when you delete certain pieces and leave the rest intact without accounting for the deleted parts. Nicholemacgregor ( talk) 00:03, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
Can you please advise on why you felt the Guild of British Camera Technicians page was about an organisation that was not notable? It was my first submission and I thought I'd done a decent job to take have it deleted is a little deflating but I can take it! Some feedback from an experienced Wiki user such as yourself would be massively appreciated.
Is it possible to have it reinstated in some form that I can improve it? I used the GBFTE page as a guide to the sort of content that a) Wiki and b) the sector would be interested in and having read the various pages around Notability I think I can probably prove that the GBCT is a notable organistation.
Thanks in advance.
HMCLSPLYL2020 ( talk) 10:02, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Can you please disable your bot from requesting reduction for File:The World of Harry Potter 4 Pack.jpg. The file only reduces by 5KB and makes the text in the image difficult to read. -- Osh33m ( talk) 01:36, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89, made very significant changes to a page you tagged as advertorial in the past. Would appreciate if you could take a look and approve. Best, Pratat ( talk) 13:19, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
I am curious as to why you are saying I did not provide any evidence in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MarnetteD#Suspected sockpuppets when I gave you all of the diffs from the start which include the named user not reverting but editing the article using the exact same wording that is in dispute and a discussion going on through the talk page? Thank you. Galendalia CVU Member \ Chat Me Up 08:12, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
It looks like something didn't work when you deleted File:Icons of Filth artwork from the album Onward Christian Soldiers.jpg per the FfD. I don't see the image but I do see "(223 × 223 pixels, file size: 18 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)" and the file history table. The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 04:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89, could you and your bot move Category:Railway stations in China by opening year to Category:Railway stations in China by year of opening as was done for the other subcategories of Category:Railway stations by year of opening relating to Canada, Russia and the United States please. Hugo999 ( talk) 09:15, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
I have just listed [3] the category at WP:CFDS, for renaming as originally proposed by User:Hugo999 in the discussion. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 22:26, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I do not believe it was the right decision to decline the histmerge of Laal Singh Chaddha and I have good reasons for disagreeing with your choice. First, my draft version of this article was created on September 16, 2019, over a month before the separate mainspace article was created on October 31, 2019. Second, User:CAP202, the creator of the mainspace article, clearly copy and pasted the information from my draft into his separate mainspace article. This user is also a band sockpuppet of User:PankhilSen. I find it very distressing that a clear act of vandalism, brought on by a known sock puppet, is not being dealt with or fixed in any meaningful way. I highly suggest in some action against this matter, as I started this article first. Cardei012597 ( talk) 04:27, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
You removed an image I added to the page John Prentice (cartoonist), yet you have let it stand on the Young Romance page, even though I sourced the same file they did. Please explain. Packer1028 ( talk) 21:04, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Hallo JJMC87, if you look at the official website www.salemkolleg.de you will see that the logo is correct. Could you please explain why you deleted it? Thanks, -- Baekemm ( talk) 13:53, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Hey JJMC89, hope you are well and safe. Would it be possible to revoke talk page access for 2600:1700:F660:4430:0:0:0:0/64 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log)? Theyhave been vandalizing their talk page after their block. Thank you! -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
@ JJMC89: - Hello! I saw that your "JJMC89 bot III" has gone through pages moving them from the category "Media companies" to "Mass media companies". I see that request on Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Speedy, but I am curious - was there any discussion of this change anywhere? I'm just curious to learn more about the rationale. Any pointers to discussion would be appreciated. Thanks. - Dyork ( talk) 15:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, @JJMC89. I'm curious as to why the subcategory I created was deleted? There is a subcategory for "Literature by women," so gender-based subcategories for types of literature have precedent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lmstevens5947 ( talk • contribs) 14:10, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I was reviewing Draft:Stjepan Glavač and I noticed you deleted the mainspace article, Stjepan Glavač, under G5. Would you mind checking if the draft has the same content as the deleted article? He looks notable but I don't want to accept a sock draft. Thanks, SpicyMilkBoy ( talk) 12:46, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Comparison of Nikon DSLR cameras. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Runnerphil712 ( talk • contribs) 18:58, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
I'm curious about this edit of yours. I had made it a redirect because that's what Callanecc suggested I do. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:36, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi there! Just wondering, but if these two users are the same person, should Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Atomic Meltdown/Archive be merged into the other one? BOZ ( talk) 02:51, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. Since you’re an SPI clerk as well as an admin, perhaps you could take a look at this. The suspected sock is still soft-blocked and the suspected master hasn’t edit in about a week. Moreover, the local file that was being deleted has been deleted per F7 and Commons’ version is currently being discussed at a Commons DR. So, if you feel that there‘s really no need for any admin action here (except perhaps for just a warning if anything), I’m fine with having the SPI closed as such. — Marchjuly ( talk) 03:25, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Some of the {{ wikinews}} variants have been merged into the main template. I wasn't sure what you wanted to do with User:JJMC89 bot/Wikinews importer so I thought I'd let you know about the changes so you could update it appropriately. Primefac ( talk) 00:40, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Please delete the Xǔ (state) redirect page and change or move the Xu (Henan) to Xǔ (state) no redirect and only one page. Thank you! K.b.cheng ( talk) 10:17, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
HI, last week I sent a request to rejoin the ACC team after being denied for not having enough edits, This has since been fixed. I have head from some other tool admins that it was received, but nothing else. Is there a problem, or does it just take some time, Is there a backlog? I am not trying to be impatient, just curious. Thanks,{{u|
wylie39}} {
Talk}
18:59, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
{{u|
wylie39}} {
Talk}
17:00, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Please block emet77 and add this account to latest sockpuppet account of peteski32
On May 18, he continues to advocate for mercilessly attacking the biography of Pat Day on the Pat Day talk page
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Peteski132/Archive
/info/en/?search=Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Peteski132 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:6C3:4081:A10:9D29:1D47:575C:D9BD ( talk) 03:22, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
I want to create a page about this referee but it see it has extended-confirmed-protected and can be edited only by extended confirmed users. Can you fix it? -- 196.119.95.98 ( talk) 12:07, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
I moved the page without moving the history and am sorry. Kindly merge the history of the page. Thank you. -- TamilMirchi —Preceding undated comment added 19:54, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Being a moderator, you always checked my page List of Pakistani Peace Laureates and fixed the errors every time for which I was always thankful to you for your support and cooperation but today I just checked my page and have found some other moderator removing the descriptions and ruining my entire page. All my efforts and struggle have been ruined. Nawab Afridi ( talk) 17:09, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Why was this category not moved to Category:Deaths from the COVID-19 pandemic in Indiana? Only this category was missing. -- Francisco ( talk) 18:15, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your edits to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PKHilliam.
Now I am confused. Do you want me to supply more diffs or what? Basically, PKHilliam would unilaterally change links from uncyclopedia.co to uncyclopedia.ca. I wanted to act fast before this case becomes stale, but I can provide more evidence if needed. :) A a s i m 05:42, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
In addition, please move Category:Hospitals in Paraná to Category:Hospitals in Paraná (state), like other subcategories in Category:Paraná (state). Thanks. -- Francisco ( talk) 17:24, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
This bot is repeatedly removing an image from the page VanossGaming even after it was resized to match the Wikipedia guidelines. The image being removed is File:EvanFong.png. Delta fiver ( talk) (UTC) 07:15, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89, I want to know how to add an image hosted on non-English Wikipedia to English Wikipedia articles. Thank you TheBirdsShedTears ( talk) 08:02, 31 May 2020 (UTC)