This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Will you please review the deletion of Play Entertainment logo file. You termed it copyright violation but I took it from a public forum, i-e their official page on Facebook where it was free to download. Moreover adding a logo to a page about channel on Wikipedia and that too from their own Facebook page, how come it be a copyright violation... (Usama Ahmad 10:50, 30 March 2019 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saamikhan01 ( talk • contribs)
Hi. Please review your reasoning for removing the File:PHP_50_obv.jpg from two articles ( Philippine fifty peso note and New Generation Currency Series) because it has a valid non-free use rationale and has satisfied requirements for WP:NFCC, as with other legal tender banknotes uploaded with similar copyright tag. Thanks. Moonrivers ( talk) 13:43, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Just blowing off steam. [1]. Once again, I'm a vandal by virtue of editing as an IP. But I will venture that if there's any history of that, perhaps rollback privilege can be reconsidered. Best, as always, 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 02:57, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
obvious vandalism and other edits where the reason for reverting is absolutely clear. Cheers, —— SerialNumber 54129 12:12, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you removed links to Hardcore Gamer in some kind of automated fashion, and was wondering if you could run the same process for Nintendo World Report (and the page it redirected to, but I can't remember the name)? The page was deleted a month ago but the links were not removed. Thanks TarkusAB talk 14:44, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Somehow I missed that the IP was blocked after making that edit. Beeblebrox ( talk) 05:08, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
For fixing my fuck ups -- Amanda (aka DQ) 07:19, 6 April 2019 (UTC) |
On a couple of topics I just posted at my talk page. Since I've spent too much time at the keyboard on a beautiful day, I'm off for a while. Hope you're enjoying fine weather, too. Thanks and cheers, 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 20:22, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
I deleted User talk:Tuxipedia/Archive 1 at the same you were declining the CSD. I figured since it wasn't created by page move, a lenient reading of DELTALK would let it be deleted by user request. If you have any hesitation about this, please feel free to restore it. Cheers, Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 03:16, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for tagging hundreds of the portals listed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Mass-created portals based on a single navbox.
I had started from the top, but they are v slow to save, so I hadn't even got half way. I am just doing a final scan, but it looks like all 1426 are now tagged. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 21:03, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi, you closed the TFD discussion for {{ Infobox Town AT}}. Given the outcome of more recent discussions about similar templates (for instance Infobox German location), I think it should have been kept (probably with some cleaning up). Could you restore this template, for instance in User namespace? Or should I start a deletion review? Markussep Talk 13:40, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. Thanks for helping to sort this out. The student who created the draft, however, has re-moved their sandbox once again. This time they did add it to the mainspace at Utah Polygamy and Law Since 2000, but the move created some new issues. Perhaps you can suggest ways to sort these out at User talk: Shalor (Wiki Ed)#User:Utah Polygamy and Law Since 2000? — Marchjuly ( talk) 20:23, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
You're right. When I check the article logged out, it does appear fine. Thanks for explaining, I'll know now to check logged out when a layout or format displays oddly before making the change. Schazjmd ( talk) 00:58, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi you deleted the image: File:Everett-G-Burkhalter-of-California.tiff. I am a bit confused as to why. I got the file from wikimedia and it seems to be covered by fair use. I may be wrong so I guess I am just looking for an explanation? Benawu2 ( talk) 15:20, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
COPYVIO has returned. Thank you for taking a look.--- Coffeeand crumbs 21:08, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Your behaviour is atleast not okey. The discussion is not over. You are even doing it again after reading of my atention. Eurohunter ( talk) 23:02, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
A wikiproject for one singer is not going to be able to gain and hold participemts. It's ju–st to narrow. We can move the page into your userspace or you can copy the key info there but no WikiProject in Wikipedia space makes sense for this narrow topic. Legacypac ( talk) 12:25, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- There is many wikiprojects for one singer so it's not argument. Eurohunter ( talk) 13:07, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Only because no one has bothered to seek deletion. Most Wikiprojects are dead anyway Legacypac ( talk) 15:20, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Would you see deletion of Christina Aguilera, Kylie Minogue or Rihanna wikiprojects? Eurohunter ( talk) 17:51, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Maybe... if they lack activity and are better handled under a wider scope wikiproject Legacypac ( talk) 22:16, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Schould I find more participants then? Eurohunter ( talk) 11:35, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I wanted to ask you about
this edit with the summary revert delete closes done contrary to
WP:NACD
. I realize that I made a mistake with the tagging of the category for deletion, but can you explain how this is contrary to NACD? Thanks, --
DannyS712 (
talk) 01:06, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Non-administrators should limit their closes to outcomes they have the technical ability to implement; for example, non-admins should not close a discussion as delete, because only admins can delete pages.
- Exception: a non-administrator may close a TfD as orphan.
Consensus in favor of this proposal would interpret the WP:NACD guideline as permitting delete closures of uncontroversial discussions by experienced editors where enacting the short-term outcome is within the technical ability of non-administrators.) and was closed as consensus in favor of implementing that idea (
However, there is clear support for at least trying out the alternative proposal. I recommend looking into a trial of the orphan/CSD mechanism, and if this fails to resolve the issue then the first question can be revisited.). Since the templates were already orphans, the CSD mechanism applied. There is no evidence that the closes are limited to orphan only when templates are still transcluded, and since orphaning a template is the same as marking it ready for deletion, I merely skipped the step of listing it as "to orphan" and then immediately moving it as ready for deletion and tagging the templates individually. While I understand you point about XFDC, I don't believe that you desire to use it warrants undoing my close with a summary that says I violated a wikipedia guideline. In short, as far as I can tell you reverted my close claiming I violated a guideline that I believe I followed, and then proceeded to make the same close yourself. -- DannyS712 ( talk) 02:18, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Exception: a non-administrator may close a TfD asif that were the case. Discussing the interpretation of NACD there is fine. — JJMC89 21:41, 19 April 2019 (UTC)orphandelete.
@ JJMC89: Hi. You recently removed an image at Western Line, Auckland with edit summary NFCC. There are three other Auckland rail lines and the same image was inserted in their infoboxes by the same user. The articles are Eastern Line, Auckland, Southern Line, Auckland, and Onehunga Line. Please take a look at them too. Akld guy ( talk) 11:18, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89, can you protect this, please? Thanks, 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 03:33, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
I found this page Somewhere in Palilula looking on the search engine and I clicked on the link I removed in the edit-it sent me to a REALLY disturbing page for porn (likely the URL changed) so can the original edit be not seen so nobody clicks on it? Thanks. Wgolf ( talk) 00:57, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Hey J, I saw you were the deleting admin. on Portal:Pensacola. That portal had a bunch of subpages as well; can you take care of them or do I have to tag each subpage with CSD G8 myself instead? Thanks! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 01:48, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for addressing the issue of the edit-warring IP at this article. Would you consider undoing the IP's last edit, which removed content from the article without explanation or justification (the removal being what they were edit warring over)? I cannot, since I am at 3RR. General Ization Talk 06:06, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi, according to this page: File:SealofMumbai.jpg, the MCGM logo can be used in the relevant articles if required. What was the motivation behind removing the icon? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymousboii ( talk • contribs) 10:16, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Would you be able to review my draft for Sirio at: Draft:SIRIO before I move it to the main space? If you can't, do I need to add a template? -- Ilirtoska ( talk) 06:08, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Hey! Related to the speedy deletion at Jeffrey Kaufman, I noticed the exact same copyvios at User:Jeffkauf2 and User:Jeffkauf2/sandbox so they should probably be deleted as well. — MarkH21 ( talk) 06:36, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for your quick action there. Would you please salt Vicky Kadian? It was previously salted, but an admin moved another page there; so I think the protection expired with that. I had accidentally created it, but I deleted it immediately. —usernamekiran (talk) 06:52, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request the page Dave Schulz (musician) be restored. I am a follower of Schulz's music and had contributed to the page in the past. I recognize there were recent edits that seemed much more promotional, and may have had copyright violations. (I didn't verify the copyright violations or not). There were also questions about notability.
I rebuilt the page yesterday following the standards of other musicians similar to Dave Schulz. In doing so, I added multiple attributions in my first draft, with intent to spend more time on it later to continue adding references and cross-link to other Wikipedia articles. I believe my new version was free of copyright and certainly not promotional in nature. If there are continued questions about notability, I would welcome a discussion on the talk page of the article.
Could you please restore my work? 99Perfectos ( talk) 22:13, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
I noticed that you have deleted these portals per a batch miscellany for deletion nomination which proposed to simultaneously delete a large number of portals.
A similar discussion involving these portals,
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, recently closed with a caveat that these particular portals should be kept.
This appears to have been an unintentional case of double jeopardy, but only in the above discussion were the involved portals specifically addressed. It would be greatly appreciated if the content may be restored per the linked MfD.
Thank you.
Brendon the Wizard
✉️
✨ 00:25, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
@ JJMC89: Hello! You recently deleted my user page, and I was wondering what I could do to avoid this in the future. I had created the page with a redirect according to this suggestion on the user page guidelines:
Should I also add some dummy content to the user talk page before doing this to avoid deletion?
Thanks for your help, Ian's Wiki Account ( talk) 02:22, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. Would you mind watching G. Finknottle in case he re-adds File:Richard Garnett as Gussie Fink-Nottle.jpg to his userpage again like he did here. His userpage ( WP:UP#GAMES) and username ( Gussie Fink-Nottle) might also be a questionable as well, but probably no harm at the moment. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 13:00, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Hey JJMC89,
In regards to
Template:Tl5/
User:MJL/tl5, {{
tlp}} is certainly an adequate template for what it's worth. I just would prefer the alternative of having the entire parameter linked to the main template (like so: {{
tlp|tl5}} ). The current use of {{
tl5}} is woefully inadequate, so I hope we both would agree it should change (I mean, it literally takes more effort to type {{tl5|example}}
than {{tl|example}}
or <nowiki>{{Example}}</nowiki>
(assuming you just click <nowiki></nowiki>
). I'd at least prefer {{
tl5}} becoming a redirect to {{
Template link with parameters}} like {{
tlp}} than maintaining the current nonusage. Would that be agreeable? –
MJL
‐Talk‐
☖ 13:45, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
<code></code>
around the thing you link. I also know it is very childish for me to think this, but I really do believe we somehow need a 45th internal link template. Therefore, I moved
MJL/tl5 to {{
tl7}}... –
MJL
‐Talk‐
☖ 03:01, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Hi JJMC. Portal:Belo Horizonte was mistakenly included in the nomination here: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/People Portals A-C, which you closed as "delete". Belo Horizonte is not, of course, the topic of a "people portal". Would you please restore the page, as the deletion discussion cited was not applicable to it : Bhunacat10 (talk), 13:14, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Can you please take care of Template:IPL Playoffs & Template:IPL Knockout templates based on the Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 April 5#Template:Cr-IPL? Thanks in advance. Sa Ga Vaj 20:49, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
You may wish to revoke talk page access.-- Cahk ( talk) 09:11, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi admin! See this please, and you are well aware of this user's edits on Jawani Phir Nahi Ani (film series). There was a dispute going on in Jawani Phir Nahi Ani 2 page and I made an RPP. Still, that user is not willing to understand their mistakes. Please guide what to do, only reverting their edits will not make them understand. Also, can the user be warned of logged-out edits? However, they have a lot of warnings on talk page too. Thanks! M. Billoo 23:06, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Please archive that to WP:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Bont, thank you. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 00:51, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 April 14#Template:Infobox Singapore neighbourhood - should be straightforward? 77.11.165.40 ( talk) 15:02, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 April 3#Template:Infobox South African municipality - more than one month since start and 25 days after relist. 77.13.207.83 ( talk) 16:25, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
In your admin duties, which I understand, you revoked my access to AWB. Does this revocation only apply to Wikipedia? Commons has given me AWB access for work on Commons, which I have not yet used, as I don't want to be seen as trying to evade any decision made in Wikipedia. Is it ok to use AWB in Commons? Thanks Hmains ( talk) 15:59, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Hey J, I saw you were the deleting admin. on Portal:Alphabet. That portal had a bunch of subpages as well; can you take care of them or do I have to tag each subpage with CSD G8 myself instead? UnitedStatesian ( talk) 20:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Phoenix Labs is an inactive software company that hasn't been active for over a decade. Phoenix Labs is also the name of a video game studio in Canada founded 4 years ago. Phoenix Labs the video game studio doesn't have a Wikipedia article. This is especially problematic because Wikipedia is feeding incorrect information to Google in search consoles. Wikipedia is mixing together information from both companies (one company's description paired with the other's logo - an incorrect and unacceptable use of the game studio's logo).
Is it possible to set the video game studio as the primary subject since that company is active and operating? If not, is it possible to redirect Phoenix Labs to a disambiguation page that lists both the active video game studio and the inactive software company?
Disclosure, I'm an employee of Phoenix Labs the game studio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpowpow ( talk • contribs) 06:37, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Will you please review the deletion of Play Entertainment logo file. You termed it copyright violation but I took it from a public forum, i-e their official page on Facebook where it was free to download. Moreover adding a logo to a page about channel on Wikipedia and that too from their own Facebook page, how come it be a copyright violation... (Usama Ahmad 10:50, 30 March 2019 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saamikhan01 ( talk • contribs)
Hi. Please review your reasoning for removing the File:PHP_50_obv.jpg from two articles ( Philippine fifty peso note and New Generation Currency Series) because it has a valid non-free use rationale and has satisfied requirements for WP:NFCC, as with other legal tender banknotes uploaded with similar copyright tag. Thanks. Moonrivers ( talk) 13:43, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Just blowing off steam. [1]. Once again, I'm a vandal by virtue of editing as an IP. But I will venture that if there's any history of that, perhaps rollback privilege can be reconsidered. Best, as always, 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 02:57, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
obvious vandalism and other edits where the reason for reverting is absolutely clear. Cheers, —— SerialNumber 54129 12:12, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you removed links to Hardcore Gamer in some kind of automated fashion, and was wondering if you could run the same process for Nintendo World Report (and the page it redirected to, but I can't remember the name)? The page was deleted a month ago but the links were not removed. Thanks TarkusAB talk 14:44, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Somehow I missed that the IP was blocked after making that edit. Beeblebrox ( talk) 05:08, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
For fixing my fuck ups -- Amanda (aka DQ) 07:19, 6 April 2019 (UTC) |
On a couple of topics I just posted at my talk page. Since I've spent too much time at the keyboard on a beautiful day, I'm off for a while. Hope you're enjoying fine weather, too. Thanks and cheers, 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 20:22, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
I deleted User talk:Tuxipedia/Archive 1 at the same you were declining the CSD. I figured since it wasn't created by page move, a lenient reading of DELTALK would let it be deleted by user request. If you have any hesitation about this, please feel free to restore it. Cheers, Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 03:16, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for tagging hundreds of the portals listed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Mass-created portals based on a single navbox.
I had started from the top, but they are v slow to save, so I hadn't even got half way. I am just doing a final scan, but it looks like all 1426 are now tagged. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 21:03, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi, you closed the TFD discussion for {{ Infobox Town AT}}. Given the outcome of more recent discussions about similar templates (for instance Infobox German location), I think it should have been kept (probably with some cleaning up). Could you restore this template, for instance in User namespace? Or should I start a deletion review? Markussep Talk 13:40, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. Thanks for helping to sort this out. The student who created the draft, however, has re-moved their sandbox once again. This time they did add it to the mainspace at Utah Polygamy and Law Since 2000, but the move created some new issues. Perhaps you can suggest ways to sort these out at User talk: Shalor (Wiki Ed)#User:Utah Polygamy and Law Since 2000? — Marchjuly ( talk) 20:23, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
You're right. When I check the article logged out, it does appear fine. Thanks for explaining, I'll know now to check logged out when a layout or format displays oddly before making the change. Schazjmd ( talk) 00:58, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi you deleted the image: File:Everett-G-Burkhalter-of-California.tiff. I am a bit confused as to why. I got the file from wikimedia and it seems to be covered by fair use. I may be wrong so I guess I am just looking for an explanation? Benawu2 ( talk) 15:20, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
COPYVIO has returned. Thank you for taking a look.--- Coffeeand crumbs 21:08, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Your behaviour is atleast not okey. The discussion is not over. You are even doing it again after reading of my atention. Eurohunter ( talk) 23:02, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
A wikiproject for one singer is not going to be able to gain and hold participemts. It's ju–st to narrow. We can move the page into your userspace or you can copy the key info there but no WikiProject in Wikipedia space makes sense for this narrow topic. Legacypac ( talk) 12:25, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- There is many wikiprojects for one singer so it's not argument. Eurohunter ( talk) 13:07, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Only because no one has bothered to seek deletion. Most Wikiprojects are dead anyway Legacypac ( talk) 15:20, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Would you see deletion of Christina Aguilera, Kylie Minogue or Rihanna wikiprojects? Eurohunter ( talk) 17:51, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Maybe... if they lack activity and are better handled under a wider scope wikiproject Legacypac ( talk) 22:16, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Schould I find more participants then? Eurohunter ( talk) 11:35, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I wanted to ask you about
this edit with the summary revert delete closes done contrary to
WP:NACD
. I realize that I made a mistake with the tagging of the category for deletion, but can you explain how this is contrary to NACD? Thanks, --
DannyS712 (
talk) 01:06, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Non-administrators should limit their closes to outcomes they have the technical ability to implement; for example, non-admins should not close a discussion as delete, because only admins can delete pages.
- Exception: a non-administrator may close a TfD as orphan.
Consensus in favor of this proposal would interpret the WP:NACD guideline as permitting delete closures of uncontroversial discussions by experienced editors where enacting the short-term outcome is within the technical ability of non-administrators.) and was closed as consensus in favor of implementing that idea (
However, there is clear support for at least trying out the alternative proposal. I recommend looking into a trial of the orphan/CSD mechanism, and if this fails to resolve the issue then the first question can be revisited.). Since the templates were already orphans, the CSD mechanism applied. There is no evidence that the closes are limited to orphan only when templates are still transcluded, and since orphaning a template is the same as marking it ready for deletion, I merely skipped the step of listing it as "to orphan" and then immediately moving it as ready for deletion and tagging the templates individually. While I understand you point about XFDC, I don't believe that you desire to use it warrants undoing my close with a summary that says I violated a wikipedia guideline. In short, as far as I can tell you reverted my close claiming I violated a guideline that I believe I followed, and then proceeded to make the same close yourself. -- DannyS712 ( talk) 02:18, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Exception: a non-administrator may close a TfD asif that were the case. Discussing the interpretation of NACD there is fine. — JJMC89 21:41, 19 April 2019 (UTC)orphandelete.
@ JJMC89: Hi. You recently removed an image at Western Line, Auckland with edit summary NFCC. There are three other Auckland rail lines and the same image was inserted in their infoboxes by the same user. The articles are Eastern Line, Auckland, Southern Line, Auckland, and Onehunga Line. Please take a look at them too. Akld guy ( talk) 11:18, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89, can you protect this, please? Thanks, 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 03:33, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
I found this page Somewhere in Palilula looking on the search engine and I clicked on the link I removed in the edit-it sent me to a REALLY disturbing page for porn (likely the URL changed) so can the original edit be not seen so nobody clicks on it? Thanks. Wgolf ( talk) 00:57, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Hey J, I saw you were the deleting admin. on Portal:Pensacola. That portal had a bunch of subpages as well; can you take care of them or do I have to tag each subpage with CSD G8 myself instead? Thanks! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 01:48, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for addressing the issue of the edit-warring IP at this article. Would you consider undoing the IP's last edit, which removed content from the article without explanation or justification (the removal being what they were edit warring over)? I cannot, since I am at 3RR. General Ization Talk 06:06, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi, according to this page: File:SealofMumbai.jpg, the MCGM logo can be used in the relevant articles if required. What was the motivation behind removing the icon? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymousboii ( talk • contribs) 10:16, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Would you be able to review my draft for Sirio at: Draft:SIRIO before I move it to the main space? If you can't, do I need to add a template? -- Ilirtoska ( talk) 06:08, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Hey! Related to the speedy deletion at Jeffrey Kaufman, I noticed the exact same copyvios at User:Jeffkauf2 and User:Jeffkauf2/sandbox so they should probably be deleted as well. — MarkH21 ( talk) 06:36, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for your quick action there. Would you please salt Vicky Kadian? It was previously salted, but an admin moved another page there; so I think the protection expired with that. I had accidentally created it, but I deleted it immediately. —usernamekiran (talk) 06:52, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request the page Dave Schulz (musician) be restored. I am a follower of Schulz's music and had contributed to the page in the past. I recognize there were recent edits that seemed much more promotional, and may have had copyright violations. (I didn't verify the copyright violations or not). There were also questions about notability.
I rebuilt the page yesterday following the standards of other musicians similar to Dave Schulz. In doing so, I added multiple attributions in my first draft, with intent to spend more time on it later to continue adding references and cross-link to other Wikipedia articles. I believe my new version was free of copyright and certainly not promotional in nature. If there are continued questions about notability, I would welcome a discussion on the talk page of the article.
Could you please restore my work? 99Perfectos ( talk) 22:13, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
I noticed that you have deleted these portals per a batch miscellany for deletion nomination which proposed to simultaneously delete a large number of portals.
A similar discussion involving these portals,
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, recently closed with a caveat that these particular portals should be kept.
This appears to have been an unintentional case of double jeopardy, but only in the above discussion were the involved portals specifically addressed. It would be greatly appreciated if the content may be restored per the linked MfD.
Thank you.
Brendon the Wizard
✉️
✨ 00:25, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
@ JJMC89: Hello! You recently deleted my user page, and I was wondering what I could do to avoid this in the future. I had created the page with a redirect according to this suggestion on the user page guidelines:
Should I also add some dummy content to the user talk page before doing this to avoid deletion?
Thanks for your help, Ian's Wiki Account ( talk) 02:22, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. Would you mind watching G. Finknottle in case he re-adds File:Richard Garnett as Gussie Fink-Nottle.jpg to his userpage again like he did here. His userpage ( WP:UP#GAMES) and username ( Gussie Fink-Nottle) might also be a questionable as well, but probably no harm at the moment. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 13:00, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Hey JJMC89,
In regards to
Template:Tl5/
User:MJL/tl5, {{
tlp}} is certainly an adequate template for what it's worth. I just would prefer the alternative of having the entire parameter linked to the main template (like so: {{
tlp|tl5}} ). The current use of {{
tl5}} is woefully inadequate, so I hope we both would agree it should change (I mean, it literally takes more effort to type {{tl5|example}}
than {{tl|example}}
or <nowiki>{{Example}}</nowiki>
(assuming you just click <nowiki></nowiki>
). I'd at least prefer {{
tl5}} becoming a redirect to {{
Template link with parameters}} like {{
tlp}} than maintaining the current nonusage. Would that be agreeable? –
MJL
‐Talk‐
☖ 13:45, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
<code></code>
around the thing you link. I also know it is very childish for me to think this, but I really do believe we somehow need a 45th internal link template. Therefore, I moved
MJL/tl5 to {{
tl7}}... –
MJL
‐Talk‐
☖ 03:01, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Hi JJMC. Portal:Belo Horizonte was mistakenly included in the nomination here: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/People Portals A-C, which you closed as "delete". Belo Horizonte is not, of course, the topic of a "people portal". Would you please restore the page, as the deletion discussion cited was not applicable to it : Bhunacat10 (talk), 13:14, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Can you please take care of Template:IPL Playoffs & Template:IPL Knockout templates based on the Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 April 5#Template:Cr-IPL? Thanks in advance. Sa Ga Vaj 20:49, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
You may wish to revoke talk page access.-- Cahk ( talk) 09:11, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi admin! See this please, and you are well aware of this user's edits on Jawani Phir Nahi Ani (film series). There was a dispute going on in Jawani Phir Nahi Ani 2 page and I made an RPP. Still, that user is not willing to understand their mistakes. Please guide what to do, only reverting their edits will not make them understand. Also, can the user be warned of logged-out edits? However, they have a lot of warnings on talk page too. Thanks! M. Billoo 23:06, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Please archive that to WP:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Bont, thank you. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 00:51, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 April 14#Template:Infobox Singapore neighbourhood - should be straightforward? 77.11.165.40 ( talk) 15:02, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 April 3#Template:Infobox South African municipality - more than one month since start and 25 days after relist. 77.13.207.83 ( talk) 16:25, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
In your admin duties, which I understand, you revoked my access to AWB. Does this revocation only apply to Wikipedia? Commons has given me AWB access for work on Commons, which I have not yet used, as I don't want to be seen as trying to evade any decision made in Wikipedia. Is it ok to use AWB in Commons? Thanks Hmains ( talk) 15:59, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Hey J, I saw you were the deleting admin. on Portal:Alphabet. That portal had a bunch of subpages as well; can you take care of them or do I have to tag each subpage with CSD G8 myself instead? UnitedStatesian ( talk) 20:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Phoenix Labs is an inactive software company that hasn't been active for over a decade. Phoenix Labs is also the name of a video game studio in Canada founded 4 years ago. Phoenix Labs the video game studio doesn't have a Wikipedia article. This is especially problematic because Wikipedia is feeding incorrect information to Google in search consoles. Wikipedia is mixing together information from both companies (one company's description paired with the other's logo - an incorrect and unacceptable use of the game studio's logo).
Is it possible to set the video game studio as the primary subject since that company is active and operating? If not, is it possible to redirect Phoenix Labs to a disambiguation page that lists both the active video game studio and the inactive software company?
Disclosure, I'm an employee of Phoenix Labs the game studio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpowpow ( talk • contribs) 06:37, 30 April 2019 (UTC)