This is Nawab Afridi's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Hello, Nawab Afridi!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Robert McClenon (
talk) 00:11, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
|
An article you recently created,
List of Pakistani Peace Laureates, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
GPL93 (
talk) 22:17, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
S0091. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Holi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
help desk. Thanks.
S0091 (
talk) 18:14, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Draft:Farhan Wilayat Butt, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Farhan Wilayat Butt and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Farhan Wilayat Butt during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Yunshui 雲 水 07:44, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Nawab Afridi ( talk) 08:00, 13 March 2020 (UTC) I am agreed for removal of deletion of that page. This is true that I uploaded the profile/ article about that person without his prior consent and permission. I am afraid he can also sue me for this. I therefore request you to please remove that draft and relevant discussion about that subject.
Nawab Afridi ( talk) 05:29, 19 March 2020 (UTC) In continuation to our above communication. Please be apprised that only draft of Farhan Wilayat Butt needs to delete. The subject is not demanding me for removal of his pictures from wikipedia. So, please do not remove my other uploads. I have just noticed this post on wikipedia according to which my various other posts are not recommended for deletion which is not fair. When the subject has not demanded deletion of those photos then why those files are recommended for deletion. Please do not delete my other stuff which has been captured under my own copyrights and with my own camera. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Nawab_Afridi#Files_uploaded_by_Nawab_Afridi_%28talk_%C2%B7_contribs%29
Hello Nawab Afridi, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Valmiki Mandir have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Money emoji💵 Talk💸 Help out at CCI! 16:29, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Your addition to Valmiki Mandir has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa ( talk) 22:16, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for supporting Aurat March article with relevant photographs. Some one else changed section arrangement in the article that is why you might have been confused for some time.
My only suggestion is to have photos visible after every two paragraph for better to keep article easy readable.
Since I was browsing your uploads on commons realized that about deletion notice so I did add my personal comment on the page. Hope it helps to some extent.
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku ( talk) 09:30, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Nawab Afridi ( talk) 09:52, 19 March 2020 (UTC) Thank you very much Mr. Bookku for your positive response. May God bless you.
Best Wishes
Bookku ( talk) 10:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Nawab Afridi (
talk) 11:53, 19 March 2020 (UTC) Dear Mr.
Bookku, Thank you really very much for your supportive words and kind recommendations for not removing my material from wikipedia. Actually, I spent years in capturing all those images in order to spread interfaith peace & harmony but removal of those images from wikipedia can ruin my efforts and struggle. I am really grateful to you for your kind favour and suggestions. May God bless you with long life, best health, and lots of happiness.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
-- RoySmith (talk) 14:03, 6 May 2020 (UTC)Thanks for your message re List of Pakistani Peace Laureates. I am not a "moderator" ( I assume you mean admin). I would just point out that the article is not "your page" once the article is on wikipedia anyone can edit it. It appears that User:Keith D and User:Diannaa have edited the article - they are both experienced editors and I don't see anything wrong with what they did - I can not see all the edits as a copyright violation was, correctly, removed which means part of the edit history is hidden. If you are also User:72.255.58.50 then some of the comments on the talk page are not very constructive or helpful.— Rod talk 18:01, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Nawab Afridi ( talk) 18:19, 25 May 2020 (UTC) Yes, I have noticed all the comments and correspondence between User:72.255.58.50 and User:Diannaa which is not quite pleasant. It took more than an hour to trace the actual person using this system at that time. The thing is, this system is under use of a various volunteers who by and by helped us making and updating this page. I understand it is no more my page but I meant to say that it took our hours, days and weeks to generate that list and to mention each and every international peace award received by Pakistani people. The person who misbehaved with User:Diannaa told me that he tried many times and wrote the details in his own words and requested User:Diannaa to help but instead of helping/ guiding he got blocked by her. I shall try to again update the details but I shall also seek help and cooperation from admins/ editors. Most importantly, some information shared by User:72.255.58.50 has really made me worried because still in case we prepare a description in our own words, we shall be blocked (just like him).
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Pakistani Peace Laureates, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:16, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Nawab Afridi. I've noticed that you've uploaded quite a number of the images being used in this article are ones that you've uploaded to Wikimedia Commons as your "own work". Normally, it's best to discuss images uploaded to Commons on Commons, but after looking at your Commons' user talk page ( c:User talk:Nawab Afridi) and seeing all of the image related notifications which have been added there, I've decided to bring this your attention here since this seems to be where you're more active.
Commons really only accepts photos which have been released by their original copyright holders in accordance with c:Commons:Licensing. Generally, the copyright holder of a photo is considered to be the photographer who actually took the photo; so, when you upload a photo of someone under a claim of "own work", you are basically saying that you are the person who took the photo. Finding a photo online taken by someone else online, etc., scanning it or otherwise downloading it onto your computer, and then uploading it to Commons doesn't not make the photo your "own work". So, even though you probably meant well, if you didn't take the photo you're uploading, you shouldn't be licensing them as your "own work". Instead, you will need to follow instructions given in c:Commons:OTRS#If you are NOT the copyright holder and obtain the permission of the original copyright holders of the photos (i.e. the persons who took the photos) so that their WP:CONSENT to release the photos under a free license can be properly verified. If you did take some of the photos, then you can email your WP:CONSENT to Wikimedia OTRS for verification purposes. Unless the consent of the original copyright holders can be properly verified, most if not all of the files you upload will likely need to be deleted from Commons.
While I think it's possible for you to be the copyright holder of some of the files you uploaded, it doesn't seem likely that you are the copyright holder of all of the files you uploaded. Some of the photos of people who have been dead from quite some time, so it would've been possible for a recent photo of them to have been taken. The quality of the photos also varies quite a bit (some even look like scans), which has the look of them being taken by different photographers, and there is pretty much no EXIF data which indicates the photo were taken by the same person using the same equipment/camera. In addition, you've also upload some logs of organizations as "own work", which seems unlikely because the copyright holders of these logos would be the organizations the logos represent and their consent would need to be verified.
It's OK if you just made a mistake here and misunderstood Commons licensing requirements. Lots of people do make such a mistake since image licensing can be a bit complex when it comes to Commons. However, all of the file deletion notifications added to your Commons' user talk page is not a good thing. Commons and Wikipedia are Wikimedia Foundation operated sister projects, but they each have their own respective policies and guidelines. Commons takes image licensing quite seriously and will not host files it thinks are possible copyright violations. Moreover, while it understands that mistakes are going to be made when it comes to image licensing, Commons administrators will block persons who continuously upload files with licensing problems, even such persons are just making honest mistakes. So, before you try and upload any further images to Commons, I suggest you try and sort out the ones you've already uploaded and make sure their respective licensing is acceptable for Commons. Making a mistake once is OK, but repeating the same mistake over and over again is not and that's the point you're pretty close to if not already passed right now. If you've got any questions about this, you can ask them below or you can ask for help at c:Commons:Village pump/copyright. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 22:29, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
clicks saved in DVDs and USBs, but perhaps we can try and sort out the licensing of one of the files you recently uploaded and then take things from there. First of all, Commons and Wikipedia are different projects that serve different roles. Commons only real function is to host files; so, its primary concern is to make sure as best that it can that the licensing on the files it host is correct. Commons is a global website so it needs to take into the copyright laws of lots of different countries. Commons isn't really concerned with how the files it hosts are used or who is using them; so, files aren't really deleted from Commons for reasons of "notability". Wikipedia, on the other hand, is where photos uploaded to Commons are usually used. Wikipedia is also concerned with how files are licensed, but it's also just as concerned with how files are being used. Wikipedia doesn't really have notability guidelines related specifically to images, but it does have Wikipedia:Image use policy which governs how images may be used on Wikipedia. If some of the files you uploaded to Commons were deleted, then that almost certainly had to do with copyright issues, not notability issues. If you created (or tried to create) a Wikipedia article about something that was either declined or declined, then that almost certainly had to do with notability. It's easy to mix the two things up, but there quite different reasons.Anyway, let's try to sort out one of the files you uploaded. You uploaded File:Akhtar-Hameed-Khan-Pakistani-Social-Scientist.jpg on May 20, 2020. In the description you provided for the file, you state that the photo was taken on February 12, 2019. You are also claiming that the file is your "own work", which for Commons' purposes means that you took the photo yourself. Did you take this photo? According to Akhtar Hameed Khan, the Wikipedia article where the photo is being used, the subject of the photo died in 1999. In addition, the caption provided for the photo states "Akhter Hameed Khan, 1973". So, if you did take this photo, perhaps you can help clear up the discrepancies in the dates. How is it possible for a photo from 1973 of someone who died in 1999 to have been taken by you in February 2019? Sometimes people upload old photos they have taken to Commons or upload photos that they didn't take but now own the copyright on; so, if either of those things are the case here, you can really help sort things out by clarifying the matter. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 23:29, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kamalthakurbscit, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Saqib ( talk) 09:50, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
This account has been
blocked indefinitely from editing for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nawab Afridi. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans
may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs) 08:47, 15 June 2020 (UTC) |
This is Nawab Afridi's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Hello, Nawab Afridi!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Robert McClenon (
talk) 00:11, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
|
An article you recently created,
List of Pakistani Peace Laureates, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
GPL93 (
talk) 22:17, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
S0091. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Holi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
help desk. Thanks.
S0091 (
talk) 18:14, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Draft:Farhan Wilayat Butt, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Farhan Wilayat Butt and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Farhan Wilayat Butt during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Yunshui 雲 水 07:44, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Nawab Afridi ( talk) 08:00, 13 March 2020 (UTC) I am agreed for removal of deletion of that page. This is true that I uploaded the profile/ article about that person without his prior consent and permission. I am afraid he can also sue me for this. I therefore request you to please remove that draft and relevant discussion about that subject.
Nawab Afridi ( talk) 05:29, 19 March 2020 (UTC) In continuation to our above communication. Please be apprised that only draft of Farhan Wilayat Butt needs to delete. The subject is not demanding me for removal of his pictures from wikipedia. So, please do not remove my other uploads. I have just noticed this post on wikipedia according to which my various other posts are not recommended for deletion which is not fair. When the subject has not demanded deletion of those photos then why those files are recommended for deletion. Please do not delete my other stuff which has been captured under my own copyrights and with my own camera. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Nawab_Afridi#Files_uploaded_by_Nawab_Afridi_%28talk_%C2%B7_contribs%29
Hello Nawab Afridi, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Valmiki Mandir have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Money emoji💵 Talk💸 Help out at CCI! 16:29, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Your addition to Valmiki Mandir has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa ( talk) 22:16, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for supporting Aurat March article with relevant photographs. Some one else changed section arrangement in the article that is why you might have been confused for some time.
My only suggestion is to have photos visible after every two paragraph for better to keep article easy readable.
Since I was browsing your uploads on commons realized that about deletion notice so I did add my personal comment on the page. Hope it helps to some extent.
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku ( talk) 09:30, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Nawab Afridi ( talk) 09:52, 19 March 2020 (UTC) Thank you very much Mr. Bookku for your positive response. May God bless you.
Best Wishes
Bookku ( talk) 10:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Nawab Afridi (
talk) 11:53, 19 March 2020 (UTC) Dear Mr.
Bookku, Thank you really very much for your supportive words and kind recommendations for not removing my material from wikipedia. Actually, I spent years in capturing all those images in order to spread interfaith peace & harmony but removal of those images from wikipedia can ruin my efforts and struggle. I am really grateful to you for your kind favour and suggestions. May God bless you with long life, best health, and lots of happiness.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
-- RoySmith (talk) 14:03, 6 May 2020 (UTC)Thanks for your message re List of Pakistani Peace Laureates. I am not a "moderator" ( I assume you mean admin). I would just point out that the article is not "your page" once the article is on wikipedia anyone can edit it. It appears that User:Keith D and User:Diannaa have edited the article - they are both experienced editors and I don't see anything wrong with what they did - I can not see all the edits as a copyright violation was, correctly, removed which means part of the edit history is hidden. If you are also User:72.255.58.50 then some of the comments on the talk page are not very constructive or helpful.— Rod talk 18:01, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Nawab Afridi ( talk) 18:19, 25 May 2020 (UTC) Yes, I have noticed all the comments and correspondence between User:72.255.58.50 and User:Diannaa which is not quite pleasant. It took more than an hour to trace the actual person using this system at that time. The thing is, this system is under use of a various volunteers who by and by helped us making and updating this page. I understand it is no more my page but I meant to say that it took our hours, days and weeks to generate that list and to mention each and every international peace award received by Pakistani people. The person who misbehaved with User:Diannaa told me that he tried many times and wrote the details in his own words and requested User:Diannaa to help but instead of helping/ guiding he got blocked by her. I shall try to again update the details but I shall also seek help and cooperation from admins/ editors. Most importantly, some information shared by User:72.255.58.50 has really made me worried because still in case we prepare a description in our own words, we shall be blocked (just like him).
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Pakistani Peace Laureates, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:16, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Nawab Afridi. I've noticed that you've uploaded quite a number of the images being used in this article are ones that you've uploaded to Wikimedia Commons as your "own work". Normally, it's best to discuss images uploaded to Commons on Commons, but after looking at your Commons' user talk page ( c:User talk:Nawab Afridi) and seeing all of the image related notifications which have been added there, I've decided to bring this your attention here since this seems to be where you're more active.
Commons really only accepts photos which have been released by their original copyright holders in accordance with c:Commons:Licensing. Generally, the copyright holder of a photo is considered to be the photographer who actually took the photo; so, when you upload a photo of someone under a claim of "own work", you are basically saying that you are the person who took the photo. Finding a photo online taken by someone else online, etc., scanning it or otherwise downloading it onto your computer, and then uploading it to Commons doesn't not make the photo your "own work". So, even though you probably meant well, if you didn't take the photo you're uploading, you shouldn't be licensing them as your "own work". Instead, you will need to follow instructions given in c:Commons:OTRS#If you are NOT the copyright holder and obtain the permission of the original copyright holders of the photos (i.e. the persons who took the photos) so that their WP:CONSENT to release the photos under a free license can be properly verified. If you did take some of the photos, then you can email your WP:CONSENT to Wikimedia OTRS for verification purposes. Unless the consent of the original copyright holders can be properly verified, most if not all of the files you upload will likely need to be deleted from Commons.
While I think it's possible for you to be the copyright holder of some of the files you uploaded, it doesn't seem likely that you are the copyright holder of all of the files you uploaded. Some of the photos of people who have been dead from quite some time, so it would've been possible for a recent photo of them to have been taken. The quality of the photos also varies quite a bit (some even look like scans), which has the look of them being taken by different photographers, and there is pretty much no EXIF data which indicates the photo were taken by the same person using the same equipment/camera. In addition, you've also upload some logs of organizations as "own work", which seems unlikely because the copyright holders of these logos would be the organizations the logos represent and their consent would need to be verified.
It's OK if you just made a mistake here and misunderstood Commons licensing requirements. Lots of people do make such a mistake since image licensing can be a bit complex when it comes to Commons. However, all of the file deletion notifications added to your Commons' user talk page is not a good thing. Commons and Wikipedia are Wikimedia Foundation operated sister projects, but they each have their own respective policies and guidelines. Commons takes image licensing quite seriously and will not host files it thinks are possible copyright violations. Moreover, while it understands that mistakes are going to be made when it comes to image licensing, Commons administrators will block persons who continuously upload files with licensing problems, even such persons are just making honest mistakes. So, before you try and upload any further images to Commons, I suggest you try and sort out the ones you've already uploaded and make sure their respective licensing is acceptable for Commons. Making a mistake once is OK, but repeating the same mistake over and over again is not and that's the point you're pretty close to if not already passed right now. If you've got any questions about this, you can ask them below or you can ask for help at c:Commons:Village pump/copyright. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 22:29, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
clicks saved in DVDs and USBs, but perhaps we can try and sort out the licensing of one of the files you recently uploaded and then take things from there. First of all, Commons and Wikipedia are different projects that serve different roles. Commons only real function is to host files; so, its primary concern is to make sure as best that it can that the licensing on the files it host is correct. Commons is a global website so it needs to take into the copyright laws of lots of different countries. Commons isn't really concerned with how the files it hosts are used or who is using them; so, files aren't really deleted from Commons for reasons of "notability". Wikipedia, on the other hand, is where photos uploaded to Commons are usually used. Wikipedia is also concerned with how files are licensed, but it's also just as concerned with how files are being used. Wikipedia doesn't really have notability guidelines related specifically to images, but it does have Wikipedia:Image use policy which governs how images may be used on Wikipedia. If some of the files you uploaded to Commons were deleted, then that almost certainly had to do with copyright issues, not notability issues. If you created (or tried to create) a Wikipedia article about something that was either declined or declined, then that almost certainly had to do with notability. It's easy to mix the two things up, but there quite different reasons.Anyway, let's try to sort out one of the files you uploaded. You uploaded File:Akhtar-Hameed-Khan-Pakistani-Social-Scientist.jpg on May 20, 2020. In the description you provided for the file, you state that the photo was taken on February 12, 2019. You are also claiming that the file is your "own work", which for Commons' purposes means that you took the photo yourself. Did you take this photo? According to Akhtar Hameed Khan, the Wikipedia article where the photo is being used, the subject of the photo died in 1999. In addition, the caption provided for the photo states "Akhter Hameed Khan, 1973". So, if you did take this photo, perhaps you can help clear up the discrepancies in the dates. How is it possible for a photo from 1973 of someone who died in 1999 to have been taken by you in February 2019? Sometimes people upload old photos they have taken to Commons or upload photos that they didn't take but now own the copyright on; so, if either of those things are the case here, you can really help sort things out by clarifying the matter. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 23:29, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kamalthakurbscit, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Saqib ( talk) 09:50, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
This account has been
blocked indefinitely from editing for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nawab Afridi. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans
may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs) 08:47, 15 June 2020 (UTC) |