This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Missing permission from owner. These two images are available in various online sites. Uploader directly downloaded it from one of them and incorrectly licensed. User also attributed incorrectly to the downloaded site who themselves are not the copyright owner.-- 2405:204:D28E:9581:74D0:4D95:24F2:D24D ( talk) 16:48, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89, just a poke in case your bot job needs any thing for the new year at Wikipedia:Inactive administrators/2019. Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 01:21, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
[[User:{{int:Abusefilter-blocker}}]]
(currently:
User:Edit filter). —
xaosflux
Talk
20:09, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
JJMC89,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Semi
Hyper
cube
02:15, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Happy
New Year!
Send New Year cheer by adding {{
subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.
Happy
New Year!
Send New Year cheer by adding {{
subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.
Congratulations on your successful RFA! I'm a little late, but that won't stop me from eleven long, sordid, hasn't-Katie-gone-away-yet years ago: |
|
DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales, because if it did, it would be much, much better. All rights released under GFDL. |
Congratulations on becoming an admin! Rubbish computer ( Talk: Contribs) 17:28, 1 January 2019 (UTC) |
Hey JJMC! I wanted to bring something to your attention, as I disagree with what you did here. I'm curious to hear your thoughts behind what you did here. Thanks! Snowycats ( talk) 05:02, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Congratulations on being promoted to an administrator! Foxnpichu ( talk) 18:12, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Looks like Acalamari and I both went ass over teakettle closing your RfA. But you're an admin now. So, good luck. Maxim(talk) 17:06, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, everyone ! I appreciate the support and constructive criticism. — JJMC89 01:48, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks ! — JJMC89 02:36, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Greetings, Thanks for helping review my draft! I got a page ( Draft:Service Management Unite (SMU)) deleted by you on Jan 3rd. However, I would like to further work on this article. I need the source as a reference for further editing. Could you please help to keep the draft? Otherwise, I need to type word by word, which might take a lot of effort again. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bjct1990 ( talk • contribs) 03:18, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed you placed a request for the cover art of Big Enough (Kirin J Callinan song) on hold at Files for upload. Is it possible to reopen this request with this replacement link: [3]? Thanks! 66.87.149.228 ( talk) 06:53, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for blocking User:Royalwonder. Could you please also remove their talk page access as they are still messing around with other editors' comments ( [4]). Bennv3771 ( talk) 06:51, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello JJMC89. I probably should have pinged you since I did mention your name, and your input would not be misplaced if you chose to reply. The mention is here and the choice to comment or not is entirely yours with no ill feelings either way, and no ill intent whatsoever. Best regards.-- John Cline ( talk) 20:54, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi. You reverted my modification on the mcu tv shows list and I wanted to tell you why i modificated it. In the article, it clearly says "spring 2019" and not early 2019. And spring is more precise. Buckythewintersoldier ( talk) 01:32, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Just a reminder about adding {{ Oldffdfull}} to the talk pages of files which are kept or for which some uses are deemed OK. If you're already aware of this and just haven't gotten to it yet, then my apologies. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 04:46, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Dear JJMC89, I write to you because I replied to your comment on my request to upload the Logo of Acqua Minerale San Benedetto SPA: Wikipedia:Files for upload/December 2018 Unfortunately the page has been archived. Could you please let me know how I can proceed? Kind Regards! Tingilya85 ( talk) 17:27, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Hey, JJMC89! I've added a template for fair use to this logo -- can you recheck for me? Sorry about this, when I uploaded it I thought I was following instructions but apparently not correctly! Thanks for any help! valereee ( talk) 13:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
No, not you. The Poppy song. I've returned the page to mainspace as the video to the single now has over 50 million views on youtube. Seem okay? Thanks, and happy belated New Year! Randy Kryn ( talk) 16:43, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, would you be able to restore Draft:The CARS model? I don't know why I had it on my watchlist, presumably because I thought it was promising. Though of course, if it's utter rubbish, there's no need to restore it. Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 11:26, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Please see [5]. 81.137.62.113 ( talk) 23:23, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
You may wish to revoke talk page access.-- Cahk ( talk) 09:18, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Saw your post about this file on Fastily's user talk page. The editor who reuploaded this is the same one who blanked the FFD discussion (see User talk:JJMC89/Archives/2019/January#File talk:Janet Davies as Mrs Pike in the Dad's Army episode 'Never Too Old'.jpg) for the file. No claim of copyright ownership was made at that time or at the time of the original upload, so I assumed the file was non-free. Not sure if the reupload was just done out of frustration (like blanking the FFD) or a deliberate attempt to get around the FFD close, but the file doesn't appear to have been added back to the article. Perhaps it was deleted before that could be done. FWIW, if the uploader wants to email OTRS to verify their copyright ownership, then I have no problem with the file being re-added to the article. In that case, they should just re-upload the file directly to Commons -- Marchjuly ( talk) 03:25, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2017–2019 Iranian protests. Since you had some involvement with the 2017–2019 Iranian protests redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mhhossein talk 08:50, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this user User:Miki Filigranski Is constantly vandalizing this page. Dragon Ball Super: Broly By constantly removing up to date box office information on sites like Box Office Mojo and is instead replacing these sources with out of date figures and estimates. I've asked him several times to stop vandalising and explained to him multiple times where he's going wrong and in return I'm getting comments on my talk page like "YOU ARE AN IDIOT. FUCK OFF." "YOU FUCKING IDIOT" "YOU DON'T FUCKING UNDERSTAND AND AS SUCH BUGGER OFF" "JUST FUCKING STOP BEING AN IDIOT" "JUST SHUT THE FUCK UP AND BUGGER OFF" He's also leaving profanity on the page history. Could you possibly block him from the page. Thank you. Scabab ( talk) 21:00, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
@ JJMC89: revert to the revision which doesn't have any issue with sourcing, citation style, copyright etc. ( [7]). I done my job of being a fool, falling for a WP:EDITWAR and WP:3RR trap by editor Scabab who never read nor has basic understanding of the Wikipedian editing policy which I tried to explain it to them for X time (for e.g. Talk:Dragon Ball Super: Broly#Citation style & Copyright & Box Office update, User talk:Scabab#A reminder about sourcing (Warning), User talk:KenGohan#Citation style and referencing), trying to fix every error in their editing, citation style, requested extended confirmed protection because in goodfaith hoped the editor would read and understand its mistakes, to not report him to admins... Patience has its limits and I'm sorry for breaking up. I have issues currently in private life and this editor stuborness only escalated it. Do your part and block me for violationg WP:PERSONAL and WP:3RR. I am sorry again.-- Miki Filigranski ( talk) 21:03, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
@ Scabab and Miki Filigranski: As usual, The Wrong Version has been protected. I understand the you may not be happy about how the article currently stands, but you need to calmly discuss the issues on the article's talk page. Please comment on the content, not on editor conduct. If you can come to a consensus, then make an edit request. You may find it helpful to request a third opinion or neutrally solicit input from WP:FILM. — JJMC89 21:59, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
I edited all caps, profanity, personal attacks etc. in my commentary per WP:TPO (and as said at [9]), but the editor doesn't allow me ( [10], [11], [12]) with an excuse I'm trying to hide proof of my behavior from admins and even claimed that did not edit my comments when reverted them. Also, please tell again to the editor to " comment on the content, not on editor conduct" because seemingly isn't interested to seek that kind of discussion and consensus when started the new discussion about the content with " Due to the vandalism or disruptive edits by Miki Filigranski, a new subject is being made to explain the grosses on the suggestion of the Admin.", and again about vandalism because obviously didn't read WP:NOTVAND. I already see, and considering previous discussions, that a consensus will be hard to get...-- Miki Filigranski ( talk) 23:02, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
I don't know if a consensus was actually reaced, but the whole process of how this works has been explained as clearly as I can make it. This other guy says he's going to take a "walk" anyway and with another set of worldwide estimates coming down later the page could probably do with being unlocked now. Scabab ( talk) 12:32, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
I didn't give my opinion on the figures, they are what they are, you can't dispute factual information. That is what it grossed and you were wrong to remove it as you did with the Box Office Mojo gross yesterday multiple times despite it being reported. Movies make money daily hence the need to update it daily. Scabab ( talk) 17:54, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Please revoke talkpage access for user:70.26.162.197 . CLCStudent ( talk) 19:11, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, as a sort of follow up to User_talk:JJMC89/Archives/2019/January#G13_refund, see WT:CSD#G13 on sight?. Sorry for not pinging you earlier. – Uanfala (talk) 01:26, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
I looked at the stale draft report this morning and couldn't believe how many their were today. Thanks for plowing through all of them! -- Dolotta ( talk) 20:04, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
can we get some sort of idea as to why, like everything ?
but, immediately, just lately, why the changes that look exactly the same ? what changed in the codes that you needed to do the changes ? trying to learn rail line code ....
Dave Rave (
talk)
06:01, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
How do you submit drafts? There are a few that I want to submit.-- 27 is my favorite number. You can ask me why here. 19:06, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
{{subst:submit}}
at the top of the page and click Publish changes. —
JJMC89
03:29, 24 January 2019 (UTC)Gnome tips: even after this edit, the ISBN will still appear in Wikipedia:WikiProject Check Wikipedia/ISBN errors. In my experience, the best thing to do is this instead. There may be a better way, but I haven't discovered it yet. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 07:04, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Well, indeffing a new user for a single edit [14] feels pretty heavy handed, doesn't it? I did revert their only edit and warned them and this should normally be sufficient. Note that their user name (Cazzasim) is a form of their real name (Cameron Sim, going by the site they linked), no policy violation here. Cheers, — kashmīrī TALK 10:21, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
If you have time, could you take a look at WP:Database reports/Orphaned talk pages? There are a couple dozen orphaned talk pages from the stale draft run the other day. Thanks! -- Dolotta ( talk) 15:18, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, regarding your tagging of File:Emma Samms as Fallon Carrington.png, File:Fallon-Elizabeth Gillies.png, and File:Karen Cellini as Amanda Carrington.png for deletion per NFCC 3a. {{ Infobox soap character}} has three image parameters available because in this genre it is commonplace for multiple performers to portray a role over time, and for many years it has been regular practice to illustrate notable portrayers in this way in the hundreds of soap character articles monitored by WikiProject Soap Operas (when no free images are available, of course). Similarly, superhero character articles routinely include multiple images of various incarnations of the character in the body of the articles. If you really feel strongly that these images need to be deleted, I will open up the discussion more broadly, because this will affect many many articles. Thanks.— TAnthony Talk 15:46, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, is there any chance you might be able to restore Draft:Type theory with records? I can't recall why it was on my watchlist, so if it's utter rubbish, then there's no need. Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 13:34, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for that, but please give me a heads up and I will sort them, if I can. It is a bit annoying, having gone to all the trouble of sorting them out, to have you summarily delete them without asking for help first.-- Petebutt ( talk) 11:58, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm confused as to why this image has been removed from List of Chevrolet vehicles. Your bot claims that this is a copyright violation, yet why is this not an issue for the Blazer's Wikipedia article? The image has been removed twice, and I specified that it was not a copyright violation. Sincerely, Syntaxlord ( talk) 04:28, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia talk:Lua has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. {{3x|p}}ery ( talk) 23:06, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, could you undelete Draft talk:Slate Star Codex please? Benjamin ( talk) 08:51, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
What whas the justification for your move here, which appears to be undiscussed? Johnbod ( talk) 16:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:Explicit#Arena Football League logos. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 00:48, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Missing permission from owner. These two images are available in various online sites. Uploader directly downloaded it from one of them and incorrectly licensed. User also attributed incorrectly to the downloaded site who themselves are not the copyright owner.-- 2405:204:D28E:9581:74D0:4D95:24F2:D24D ( talk) 16:48, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89, just a poke in case your bot job needs any thing for the new year at Wikipedia:Inactive administrators/2019. Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 01:21, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
[[User:{{int:Abusefilter-blocker}}]]
(currently:
User:Edit filter). —
xaosflux
Talk
20:09, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
JJMC89,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Semi
Hyper
cube
02:15, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Happy
New Year!
Send New Year cheer by adding {{
subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.
Happy
New Year!
Send New Year cheer by adding {{
subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.
Congratulations on your successful RFA! I'm a little late, but that won't stop me from eleven long, sordid, hasn't-Katie-gone-away-yet years ago: |
|
DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales, because if it did, it would be much, much better. All rights released under GFDL. |
Congratulations on becoming an admin! Rubbish computer ( Talk: Contribs) 17:28, 1 January 2019 (UTC) |
Hey JJMC! I wanted to bring something to your attention, as I disagree with what you did here. I'm curious to hear your thoughts behind what you did here. Thanks! Snowycats ( talk) 05:02, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Congratulations on being promoted to an administrator! Foxnpichu ( talk) 18:12, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Looks like Acalamari and I both went ass over teakettle closing your RfA. But you're an admin now. So, good luck. Maxim(talk) 17:06, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, everyone ! I appreciate the support and constructive criticism. — JJMC89 01:48, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks ! — JJMC89 02:36, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Greetings, Thanks for helping review my draft! I got a page ( Draft:Service Management Unite (SMU)) deleted by you on Jan 3rd. However, I would like to further work on this article. I need the source as a reference for further editing. Could you please help to keep the draft? Otherwise, I need to type word by word, which might take a lot of effort again. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bjct1990 ( talk • contribs) 03:18, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed you placed a request for the cover art of Big Enough (Kirin J Callinan song) on hold at Files for upload. Is it possible to reopen this request with this replacement link: [3]? Thanks! 66.87.149.228 ( talk) 06:53, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for blocking User:Royalwonder. Could you please also remove their talk page access as they are still messing around with other editors' comments ( [4]). Bennv3771 ( talk) 06:51, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello JJMC89. I probably should have pinged you since I did mention your name, and your input would not be misplaced if you chose to reply. The mention is here and the choice to comment or not is entirely yours with no ill feelings either way, and no ill intent whatsoever. Best regards.-- John Cline ( talk) 20:54, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi. You reverted my modification on the mcu tv shows list and I wanted to tell you why i modificated it. In the article, it clearly says "spring 2019" and not early 2019. And spring is more precise. Buckythewintersoldier ( talk) 01:32, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Just a reminder about adding {{ Oldffdfull}} to the talk pages of files which are kept or for which some uses are deemed OK. If you're already aware of this and just haven't gotten to it yet, then my apologies. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 04:46, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Dear JJMC89, I write to you because I replied to your comment on my request to upload the Logo of Acqua Minerale San Benedetto SPA: Wikipedia:Files for upload/December 2018 Unfortunately the page has been archived. Could you please let me know how I can proceed? Kind Regards! Tingilya85 ( talk) 17:27, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Hey, JJMC89! I've added a template for fair use to this logo -- can you recheck for me? Sorry about this, when I uploaded it I thought I was following instructions but apparently not correctly! Thanks for any help! valereee ( talk) 13:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
No, not you. The Poppy song. I've returned the page to mainspace as the video to the single now has over 50 million views on youtube. Seem okay? Thanks, and happy belated New Year! Randy Kryn ( talk) 16:43, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, would you be able to restore Draft:The CARS model? I don't know why I had it on my watchlist, presumably because I thought it was promising. Though of course, if it's utter rubbish, there's no need to restore it. Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 11:26, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Please see [5]. 81.137.62.113 ( talk) 23:23, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
You may wish to revoke talk page access.-- Cahk ( talk) 09:18, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Saw your post about this file on Fastily's user talk page. The editor who reuploaded this is the same one who blanked the FFD discussion (see User talk:JJMC89/Archives/2019/January#File talk:Janet Davies as Mrs Pike in the Dad's Army episode 'Never Too Old'.jpg) for the file. No claim of copyright ownership was made at that time or at the time of the original upload, so I assumed the file was non-free. Not sure if the reupload was just done out of frustration (like blanking the FFD) or a deliberate attempt to get around the FFD close, but the file doesn't appear to have been added back to the article. Perhaps it was deleted before that could be done. FWIW, if the uploader wants to email OTRS to verify their copyright ownership, then I have no problem with the file being re-added to the article. In that case, they should just re-upload the file directly to Commons -- Marchjuly ( talk) 03:25, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2017–2019 Iranian protests. Since you had some involvement with the 2017–2019 Iranian protests redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mhhossein talk 08:50, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this user User:Miki Filigranski Is constantly vandalizing this page. Dragon Ball Super: Broly By constantly removing up to date box office information on sites like Box Office Mojo and is instead replacing these sources with out of date figures and estimates. I've asked him several times to stop vandalising and explained to him multiple times where he's going wrong and in return I'm getting comments on my talk page like "YOU ARE AN IDIOT. FUCK OFF." "YOU FUCKING IDIOT" "YOU DON'T FUCKING UNDERSTAND AND AS SUCH BUGGER OFF" "JUST FUCKING STOP BEING AN IDIOT" "JUST SHUT THE FUCK UP AND BUGGER OFF" He's also leaving profanity on the page history. Could you possibly block him from the page. Thank you. Scabab ( talk) 21:00, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
@ JJMC89: revert to the revision which doesn't have any issue with sourcing, citation style, copyright etc. ( [7]). I done my job of being a fool, falling for a WP:EDITWAR and WP:3RR trap by editor Scabab who never read nor has basic understanding of the Wikipedian editing policy which I tried to explain it to them for X time (for e.g. Talk:Dragon Ball Super: Broly#Citation style & Copyright & Box Office update, User talk:Scabab#A reminder about sourcing (Warning), User talk:KenGohan#Citation style and referencing), trying to fix every error in their editing, citation style, requested extended confirmed protection because in goodfaith hoped the editor would read and understand its mistakes, to not report him to admins... Patience has its limits and I'm sorry for breaking up. I have issues currently in private life and this editor stuborness only escalated it. Do your part and block me for violationg WP:PERSONAL and WP:3RR. I am sorry again.-- Miki Filigranski ( talk) 21:03, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
@ Scabab and Miki Filigranski: As usual, The Wrong Version has been protected. I understand the you may not be happy about how the article currently stands, but you need to calmly discuss the issues on the article's talk page. Please comment on the content, not on editor conduct. If you can come to a consensus, then make an edit request. You may find it helpful to request a third opinion or neutrally solicit input from WP:FILM. — JJMC89 21:59, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
I edited all caps, profanity, personal attacks etc. in my commentary per WP:TPO (and as said at [9]), but the editor doesn't allow me ( [10], [11], [12]) with an excuse I'm trying to hide proof of my behavior from admins and even claimed that did not edit my comments when reverted them. Also, please tell again to the editor to " comment on the content, not on editor conduct" because seemingly isn't interested to seek that kind of discussion and consensus when started the new discussion about the content with " Due to the vandalism or disruptive edits by Miki Filigranski, a new subject is being made to explain the grosses on the suggestion of the Admin.", and again about vandalism because obviously didn't read WP:NOTVAND. I already see, and considering previous discussions, that a consensus will be hard to get...-- Miki Filigranski ( talk) 23:02, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
I don't know if a consensus was actually reaced, but the whole process of how this works has been explained as clearly as I can make it. This other guy says he's going to take a "walk" anyway and with another set of worldwide estimates coming down later the page could probably do with being unlocked now. Scabab ( talk) 12:32, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
I didn't give my opinion on the figures, they are what they are, you can't dispute factual information. That is what it grossed and you were wrong to remove it as you did with the Box Office Mojo gross yesterday multiple times despite it being reported. Movies make money daily hence the need to update it daily. Scabab ( talk) 17:54, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Please revoke talkpage access for user:70.26.162.197 . CLCStudent ( talk) 19:11, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, as a sort of follow up to User_talk:JJMC89/Archives/2019/January#G13_refund, see WT:CSD#G13 on sight?. Sorry for not pinging you earlier. – Uanfala (talk) 01:26, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
I looked at the stale draft report this morning and couldn't believe how many their were today. Thanks for plowing through all of them! -- Dolotta ( talk) 20:04, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
can we get some sort of idea as to why, like everything ?
but, immediately, just lately, why the changes that look exactly the same ? what changed in the codes that you needed to do the changes ? trying to learn rail line code ....
Dave Rave (
talk)
06:01, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
How do you submit drafts? There are a few that I want to submit.-- 27 is my favorite number. You can ask me why here. 19:06, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
{{subst:submit}}
at the top of the page and click Publish changes. —
JJMC89
03:29, 24 January 2019 (UTC)Gnome tips: even after this edit, the ISBN will still appear in Wikipedia:WikiProject Check Wikipedia/ISBN errors. In my experience, the best thing to do is this instead. There may be a better way, but I haven't discovered it yet. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 07:04, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Well, indeffing a new user for a single edit [14] feels pretty heavy handed, doesn't it? I did revert their only edit and warned them and this should normally be sufficient. Note that their user name (Cazzasim) is a form of their real name (Cameron Sim, going by the site they linked), no policy violation here. Cheers, — kashmīrī TALK 10:21, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
If you have time, could you take a look at WP:Database reports/Orphaned talk pages? There are a couple dozen orphaned talk pages from the stale draft run the other day. Thanks! -- Dolotta ( talk) 15:18, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, regarding your tagging of File:Emma Samms as Fallon Carrington.png, File:Fallon-Elizabeth Gillies.png, and File:Karen Cellini as Amanda Carrington.png for deletion per NFCC 3a. {{ Infobox soap character}} has three image parameters available because in this genre it is commonplace for multiple performers to portray a role over time, and for many years it has been regular practice to illustrate notable portrayers in this way in the hundreds of soap character articles monitored by WikiProject Soap Operas (when no free images are available, of course). Similarly, superhero character articles routinely include multiple images of various incarnations of the character in the body of the articles. If you really feel strongly that these images need to be deleted, I will open up the discussion more broadly, because this will affect many many articles. Thanks.— TAnthony Talk 15:46, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, is there any chance you might be able to restore Draft:Type theory with records? I can't recall why it was on my watchlist, so if it's utter rubbish, then there's no need. Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 13:34, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for that, but please give me a heads up and I will sort them, if I can. It is a bit annoying, having gone to all the trouble of sorting them out, to have you summarily delete them without asking for help first.-- Petebutt ( talk) 11:58, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm confused as to why this image has been removed from List of Chevrolet vehicles. Your bot claims that this is a copyright violation, yet why is this not an issue for the Blazer's Wikipedia article? The image has been removed twice, and I specified that it was not a copyright violation. Sincerely, Syntaxlord ( talk) 04:28, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia talk:Lua has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. {{3x|p}}ery ( talk) 23:06, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, could you undelete Draft talk:Slate Star Codex please? Benjamin ( talk) 08:51, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
What whas the justification for your move here, which appears to be undiscussed? Johnbod ( talk) 16:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:Explicit#Arena Football League logos. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 00:48, 29 January 2019 (UTC)