This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Hello. I'm currently going through Wikinews portals (which are being deprecated in favour of categories). I was alerted to n:Portal:Drink, which I'd redirected to n:Category:Drink, but it appears the portal is being used by your bot to update {{ Wikinewshas/Drink}}. The bot also updates {{ Wikinewshas/Film}}, {{ Wikinewshas/Hawaii}}, and {{ Wikinewshas/Indiana}}. Could the bot be re-coded to retrieve information from the relevant Wikinews categories, so we can proceed with redirecting these portals? Cheers. Green Giant ( talk) 00:07, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the user welcone! MARY G. Mary G. ( talk) 23:02, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
The political party is called Nepal Communist Party (NCP), with the brackets. That's the official name. It's not unnecessary to include the brackets. Please restore the previous page. SimulationWig ( talk) 04:50, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
You have repeatedly removed this logo from the Firefly Balloons article and now finally tagged the image file for lacking a list of articles it is used in and/or insufficient rationale. I have asked you to discuss instead of reverting, but you have continued to revert. I have checked the image file and it seem to have a standard template rationale and also lists the sole article it is used in. I hope this will address whatever your concerns were, but if not then please detail them, or better yet, fix the image file, so this can be resolved without removing the logo file. - Ahunt ( talk) 12:52, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
|article=
parameter which probably explains why a bot or JJMC89 kept removing the logo. Minor thing perhaps, but it is still a NFCC#10c violation. It's probably something you didn't notice when you checked the rationale and re-added the file to the article the first time around. --
Marchjuly (
talk)
13:01, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Could I ask why you did this removal? The image seems perfectly appropriate to me. DS ( talk) 18:36, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Would you mind running this report again? User:JJMC89 bot/report/AfC decline counts It just got much more useful now that WP:NMFD has been modified by RFC. Thanks Legacypac ( talk) 23:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello JJMC89, I think the issues about this page have been solved. I don't know what you think about it. The page is similar to those of the author's noted colleagues Harry Halbreich, Pierre Vidal (composer) and Marc Vignal. Maybe you can suppress the frame about issues after checking and reading the page once more. Kind regards, Paul-Eric Langevin ( talk) 15:45, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Hey JJMC89, my understanding is that the non-free logo in question is the File:European Court of Justice.png for the Court of Justice of the European Union, which is one of the 7 official EU institutions, and that the European Court of Justice (ECJ) is a child organisation that uses the same logo. Currently the ECJ article uses the logo, but the CJEU, which represents the whole judiciary, and to which the logo ultimately belongs does not. The logo is synonymous with both. Luxofluxo ( talk) 05:35, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
|
Hi, just noting that JJMC89 bot appears to have stopped replacing BSicon redirects again (although the process was running when I checked it). If it is working the file here should be replaced soon. Jc86035 ( talk) 00:34, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. I'm not discounting the reasons why you've nominated files such as File:Otto Dix Sy von Harden.jpg for discussion at WP:FFD. In fact, I agree they probably need to be discussed, and that this discussion is over do. However, just based upon past personal experiences in similar discussons, these types of FFD discussions can get very contentious fairly quickly and often devolve into "common sense image user" vs. "image nazi/deletionist" type of discusisons. That doesn't mean these discussions shouldn't take place just to avoid the chance of things getting a bit nasty, but there might be little things that can be done to try and lessen the chance of that happening.
So, it might be a good idea to either add {{ ffdc}} to the individual files, or perhaps a more general notice like {{ Please see}} to the article talk page or to the relevant WikiProject page. Not many people are probably watching the file pages as the articles themselves and the uploaders often aren't the editors adding the files to these various articles. Which means there is almost always someone who shows up later claiming they weren't properly notified. These additional notifications are not mandatory per WP:FFD, but they don't really take any extra time to do and nobody can try and make an issue out this later on. Anyway, just a suggestion. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 02:36, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
https://quarry.wmflabs.org/ShakespeareFan00
Any of these useful for image patrol? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:57, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
The bot that used to generate user talk page messages for drafts that would soon be eligible for G13 deletion (roughly at the five-month mark, I think) doesn't seem to be working. It might be a good idea to delay tagging eligible drafts for G13 until after the five-month warning messages have been sent. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 06:29, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Thank you very much! Rhinen —Preceding undated comment added 13:59, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Can you explain this edit to me? Is it simply that the image file is linked to the wrong article title (" How Many More Times" instead of " How Many More Years") - which presumably can be readily corrected as a simple error - or is there another reason? Ghmyrtle ( talk) 20:06, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Hello. I'm currently going through Wikinews portals (which are being deprecated in favour of categories). I was alerted to n:Portal:Drink, which I'd redirected to n:Category:Drink, but it appears the portal is being used by your bot to update {{ Wikinewshas/Drink}}. The bot also updates {{ Wikinewshas/Film}}, {{ Wikinewshas/Hawaii}}, and {{ Wikinewshas/Indiana}}. Could the bot be re-coded to retrieve information from the relevant Wikinews categories, so we can proceed with redirecting these portals? Cheers. Green Giant ( talk) 00:07, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the user welcone! MARY G. Mary G. ( talk) 23:02, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
The political party is called Nepal Communist Party (NCP), with the brackets. That's the official name. It's not unnecessary to include the brackets. Please restore the previous page. SimulationWig ( talk) 04:50, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
You have repeatedly removed this logo from the Firefly Balloons article and now finally tagged the image file for lacking a list of articles it is used in and/or insufficient rationale. I have asked you to discuss instead of reverting, but you have continued to revert. I have checked the image file and it seem to have a standard template rationale and also lists the sole article it is used in. I hope this will address whatever your concerns were, but if not then please detail them, or better yet, fix the image file, so this can be resolved without removing the logo file. - Ahunt ( talk) 12:52, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
|article=
parameter which probably explains why a bot or JJMC89 kept removing the logo. Minor thing perhaps, but it is still a NFCC#10c violation. It's probably something you didn't notice when you checked the rationale and re-added the file to the article the first time around. --
Marchjuly (
talk)
13:01, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Could I ask why you did this removal? The image seems perfectly appropriate to me. DS ( talk) 18:36, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Would you mind running this report again? User:JJMC89 bot/report/AfC decline counts It just got much more useful now that WP:NMFD has been modified by RFC. Thanks Legacypac ( talk) 23:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello JJMC89, I think the issues about this page have been solved. I don't know what you think about it. The page is similar to those of the author's noted colleagues Harry Halbreich, Pierre Vidal (composer) and Marc Vignal. Maybe you can suppress the frame about issues after checking and reading the page once more. Kind regards, Paul-Eric Langevin ( talk) 15:45, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Hey JJMC89, my understanding is that the non-free logo in question is the File:European Court of Justice.png for the Court of Justice of the European Union, which is one of the 7 official EU institutions, and that the European Court of Justice (ECJ) is a child organisation that uses the same logo. Currently the ECJ article uses the logo, but the CJEU, which represents the whole judiciary, and to which the logo ultimately belongs does not. The logo is synonymous with both. Luxofluxo ( talk) 05:35, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
|
Hi, just noting that JJMC89 bot appears to have stopped replacing BSicon redirects again (although the process was running when I checked it). If it is working the file here should be replaced soon. Jc86035 ( talk) 00:34, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. I'm not discounting the reasons why you've nominated files such as File:Otto Dix Sy von Harden.jpg for discussion at WP:FFD. In fact, I agree they probably need to be discussed, and that this discussion is over do. However, just based upon past personal experiences in similar discussons, these types of FFD discussions can get very contentious fairly quickly and often devolve into "common sense image user" vs. "image nazi/deletionist" type of discusisons. That doesn't mean these discussions shouldn't take place just to avoid the chance of things getting a bit nasty, but there might be little things that can be done to try and lessen the chance of that happening.
So, it might be a good idea to either add {{ ffdc}} to the individual files, or perhaps a more general notice like {{ Please see}} to the article talk page or to the relevant WikiProject page. Not many people are probably watching the file pages as the articles themselves and the uploaders often aren't the editors adding the files to these various articles. Which means there is almost always someone who shows up later claiming they weren't properly notified. These additional notifications are not mandatory per WP:FFD, but they don't really take any extra time to do and nobody can try and make an issue out this later on. Anyway, just a suggestion. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 02:36, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
https://quarry.wmflabs.org/ShakespeareFan00
Any of these useful for image patrol? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:57, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
The bot that used to generate user talk page messages for drafts that would soon be eligible for G13 deletion (roughly at the five-month mark, I think) doesn't seem to be working. It might be a good idea to delay tagging eligible drafts for G13 until after the five-month warning messages have been sent. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 06:29, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Thank you very much! Rhinen —Preceding undated comment added 13:59, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Can you explain this edit to me? Is it simply that the image file is linked to the wrong article title (" How Many More Times" instead of " How Many More Years") - which presumably can be readily corrected as a simple error - or is there another reason? Ghmyrtle ( talk) 20:06, 26 June 2018 (UTC)