![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Yes. Yes, it does. Better than a blank page. InedibleHulk (talk) 22:12, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
( talk page stalker), but you already knew that – Back to wrestling for a sec, I watched Raw for the first time in a long time recently when I visited some friends and they had it on. Just before I was about to leave, Ryback comes out and one of them exclaims "Hey, look, it's Goldberg!". It was good for a quick laugh. In the previous segment, they showed this great close-up shot of Bray Wyatt. I wanted to blurt out "Wow, Blackjack Mulligan has much different facial hair!", but I knew that I would have completely lost them with that remark.
Anyway...I came across Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not/BJAODN the other day. I added something at the bottom which may be of interest/amusement to you. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 04:45, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
I am pissed. Wanna get Reigns over? Let him steal Sin Cara/Hunico's coolest move. starship .paint ~ ¡Olé! 06:00, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello!
Happy New Year!
Hope you good.
I was wondering if you can help me?
I need this section rewritten based in the link ( /info/en/?search=User_talk:Russell.mo#Rewriting_required). Can you help. A lot tried to help, I keep on muddling it up. I thought of you today...
( Russell.mo ( talk) 07:36, 9 January 2015 (UTC))
Haha! Me too, since 1980. Perhaps we should form a club with very strict rules.... μηδείς ( talk) 05:39, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
I'm not trying to beat you up or anything, it's just that there's such a thing as too much detail. Y2J is wrestling right now - let's deal with what he does when his current tour of duty ends when we get there.
Vjmlhds (talk) 00:19, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
you need this kind of reassurance, as I'm certain you do not, what with your hat strategically tipped below one eye and your other eye in the mirror as you watch yourself go by, but just in case: you are not meant and it doesn't fit. I find your contributions refreshing, even when off-topic, just don't wish to feed your oversized muscular green vanity, so no barnstar, soz. --- Sluzzelin talk 00:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
What you upto?
I'm tired and bored bro, doing my work 24/7. Thought of you again! Anything fun to do/you do, where you can join me?
( Russell.mo ( talk) 18:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC))
Yeah, you are right about COD (lol). I got GTA San Andreas. I loved Mortal Kombat, I played it in Sega Mega drive 2. Mortal Kombat Armageddon seems like it consist most of the characters, view List_of_Mortal_Kombat_characters#Character_overview, I'll search for it and buy it when I get the time. I've only played a Boxing game in Play Station 2, I think it was an EA Sports game, I'm not sure. I don't mind UFC, I'll search for it when I'm searching 'MK A'. I like fighting. I am very good at it in real life, though always get defeated when it comes to it, for 3 reasons, 1) secret, 2) secret, 3) I can take my revenge in the afterlife. I have saved a few games to play in the near future because my Laptop is in 32bit mode, it doesn't allow me to play any good games because of it. I can't change it to 64bit because of the Antivirus system installed (not a great one, but will last forever. In other words, until the person who gave it changes their company). I got it from Canada btw. I've been their for 3 months. Though someone from Wikipedia advised MSE, I still fear for virus issues from my past experiences. I cannot afford to lose this AV system anyway even in the near future because the Laptop was given to me as a gift by my dear ones. Its the most valuable thing I have in my life now, along with some extras that I bought to go with it.
In the near future (about 3 years or so) , when my work is finished, when I'm in a better situation, hopefully I'll have a home, new PC and internet (and definitely be back home then), I'll give you King of Fighters, I have all of them. 97, 98, 99 will never grow old and will turn into gold... I'll also let you know before I depart this country I'm in now, if you want any games/softwares. I'll get them and upload it to you...
( Russell.mo ( talk) 13:30, 20 January 2015 (UTC))
Hi; as you know I've stayed away from "that article" and its evil twin since all the fracas; don't know if you've noticed "his" hostile vote-call against me on an ANI whose subject he has nothing to do with, but note this re the missing archives from Oct 23 to November 14.....whaaaaat?!. Something's not right in wiki-land. But that's nothing new, either huh? Skookum1 ( talk) 10:07, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Elizium23. Your recent edit to the page
Pope Benedict XVI appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please
cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Benedict is still alive. Do not imply he is dead by using "was"
Elizium23 (
talk)
18:53, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
There is nothing for me to say. I guess people who know you, would understand what this means... Russell.mo ( talk) 19:37, 29 January 2015 (UTC) |
Sorry about the EC. I thought I'd avoided it.
Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie |
Say Shalom! 13 Shevat 5775
18:40, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for what you did at Talk:Anthony Johnson (fighter). Could you please leave a support or oppose vote on the page? Your opinion is highly valued. As well, do you believe consensus has been reached? Thanks again. WWE Batman131 ( talk) 23:34, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
I didn't know that day/month/year was British, WP:YR lists it first, I find it superior because we save on the comma. Ranze ( talk) 00:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Please comment at Talk:WrestleMania 32. Thanks. starship .paint ~ ¡Olé! 12:14, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Being as you've previously made edits to the Tony Blinken article, I was hoping you could look at some changes I've suggested for the page on the Talk Page. Since I work at a public relations agency, and since Tony Blinken is a personal friend of one of the principals at my PR firm, my making the changes directly could easily be seen as a conflict of interest, so I'm making my appeal to you.
I've gone ahead and offered suggested edits with solid sourcing for the page's career section; I've also addressed the need for new citations needed elsewhere in the article. Would you take a look and see if these changes are acceptable?
Thanks in advance!
( Bgluckman ( talk) 17:26, 19 February 2015 (UTC))
Hulk, I was just wondering ... has there been a main event winner at WrestleMania who was booed out of the building before? Other than at WrestleMania X-Seven when Austin turned? starship .paint ~ ¡Olé! 05:31, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
After this, I would pay to watch a Lesnar-Reigns shoot. Whoever said Brock couldn't talk was lying. On another note... starship .paint ~ ¡Olé! 07:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
(Note to any Twitter followers Robby Redpaw may have: Nobody calls on me to remove anything below. It's not even a hidden message, so don't feel stupid if you can't see it. Feel stupid for following Robby Redpaw.) InedibleHulk (talk) 09:16, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello! You have previously made edits to pages related to Ontario. I was hoping you could look at some changes I would like to suggest for the Ontario Ombudsman page. I work at the Ontario Ombudsman's Office; we are an independent office that investigates public complaints in Ontario. Since I work there, my making changes directly may be seen as a conflict of interest. I noted that another user had previously asked you to look at suggested edits, so I wanted to request the same. In the past I have made some edits to the page to correct inaccuracies, but I thought I should seek an independent third party to ensure my edits are acceptable to the Wiki community.
I will make the edits and post them on my personal User page in the coming few days if you're amenable to looking at them. I really appreciate your consideration in this. Thank you in advance. Abursey ( talk) 20:39, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you...for taking a look. Appreciate that. I'll let you know when something is posted. Abursey ( talk) 20:44, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
And just in case you're interested... Abursey ( talk) 21:23, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
We've also noticed similar edits on this page, which is a BLP. /info/en/?search=André_Marin Abursey ( talk) 21:31, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi InedibleHulk,
Saw your note about single purpose accounts re editing the O Ontario Ombudsman and Andre Marin pages. Both myself Thissilladia ( talk) 00:23, 1 March 2015 (UTC) and my partner FriendlyBillingsgate are new to Wikipedia and were not planning on spending so much time on on subject. However, it was so unbalanced, that is where I have ended-up (my partner has had enough and quit Wiki).
In all my editing I have attempted to cite clearly, accurately and copiously. As for the rumour, gossip, etc. edits without citations, or inserts into my edits so it looks like my citations cover their insertions, I have no idea about those.
Thanks for helping to balance these pages and for the helpful notes in your changes. Thissilladia ( talk) 00:23, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. FriendlyBillingsgate ( talk) 22:11, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I sometimes wonder if anyone has ever actually tried to eat you. Were you a willing participant in this rather intimate culinary event? What part did they choose first? How long did they chew you before determining you were inedible? Were you cooked first, or did they just take a chunk out of your raw body? Were you awake during the meal? Were you served with vegetables, or chips and salad? Did you need medical treatment afterwards? What caused you to become inedible, when the rest of us apparently taste much like chicken? Or is it that you just call yourself InedibleHulk in order to fend off those who view you with slavering mouths and gleeful eyes? How do you know their interest isn't just sexual? (not that that's anything to be downplayed, but it is rather less controversial than human cannibalism). Or maybe their consumption of your flesh was actually part of an interesting new sexual ritual? Have you ever performed culinary masturbation, by eating yourself for the purposes of sexual arousal? So many questions, so little time. If any of this is too personal to share openly, you can always email me. :) -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 19:20, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
The obvious next question is whether "big" also stacks. The answer: Yes, it does. That's something we probably don't want getting around, unless we want to make it easier for jerks to out themselves as such (maybe not a bad thing). ― Mandruss ☎ 13:38, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Please be careful not to accidentally violate WP:BEAN. Further accidents of this nature will result in this fluffball being removed from your talk page. You're also the first person ever to receive a kitten threat!
Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie |
Say Shalom! 12 Adar 5775
19:14, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
InedibleHulk moved my comment and then Itsmejudith left an unsigned comment. I have both reversed the moval and signed the unsignature. If either of you wishes to change this, feel free, but please don't move my comment again; double indenture is the proper method if you wish to add a comment above a prior comment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Medeis ( talk • contribs)
Thanks for improvements you've been doing at Ecological footprint; Lotsa good fixes there, keep it up! NewsAndEventsGuy ( talk) 00:13, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Does it really matter why the inductees were inducted by a certain person? Including it for every entry seems pointless and just takes up space. Besides, Larry Zbyszko (for example) isn't being inducted by Sammartino because they "Headlined final Showdown at Shea in a steel cage match". It's because he was trained by Sammartino and the two were associated for years before they had their feud which was considered one of the all-time classics and they were good friends. To say otherwise is misrepresentation. Also, let's say you do this for every single entry. Bret Hart was inducted by Steve Austin and the two had an amazing match at WM13. The problem is that this wasn't the only match the two had and Bret Hart headlined 3 WrestleManias and countless other pay-per-views. Why should that one match (as magnificent as it was) be singled out simply because Austin was chosen to induct him? -- Scorpion 0422 17:22, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() | On 28 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kayla Mueller, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that ISIL hostage Kayla Mueller once participated in the International Solidarity Movement in defending the homes of Palestinians? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kayla Mueller. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
I find it offensive to add Justin Roberts' butt hurt blog on here because he shamed the award and legacy of Ultimate Warrior. He is upset that WWE let him go and stopped including him on festivities held for Connor. I don't mind Connor because everybody has their opinions on that little boy. To give you an example lots of people keep asking why was he picked there are a lots of kids battling cancer. My issue is Justin Roberts got butt hurt so he had to write his blog and accuse WWE of milking Connor's cancer battle. They do a lot for the community and teamed up with the Make a Wish foundation and the Susan B. Komen foundation to help fight cancer. I feel Roberts disrespected Ultimate Warrior in general. I don't know if facebook counts for something but when I mentioned he was butt hurt he banned me from his page instead of giving me a response. His blog does not belong in the WWE Hall of Fame Warrior Award section. Dana Warrior also gave her full support and input when establishing this award at Ultimate Warrior's request.
I understand all of that I just felt he disrespected Ultimate Warrior so I felt Roberts' input shouldn't be included. It's all good.
Hi, finally someone who tries to solve this the right way. Please see my sections on his talk page (december, a while ago) and (the newer) on ANI. Shmayo ( talk) 07:34, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Generic noun requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix ( talk) 00:30, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
I think we ought to talk about the revisions and our disagreements on the page's talk page before it is too late. Surely you agree?
/info/en/?search=Talk:Palestinian_rocket_attacks_on_Israel#Last_paragraph_of_overview
Iwant2write ( talk) 00:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
The article Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel, like all articles related to the Arab–Israeli conflict broadly construed, is subject to a one-revert restriction (1RR). You can read more about 1RR here. I encourage you to read about the rules that apply to all articles related to the Arab–Israeli conflict broadly construed here. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 02:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.— Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 02:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
While this Freddie Gray thing rages on and on, I see that the Orioles and White Sox are going to have an "empty arena match", presumably for security reasons. While I don't find baseball to be as boring as many others do, I can't imagine that this could possibly stack up to the original. Speaking of the original, I also noticed that WWE is advertising a forthcoming Lawler DVD set, which includes that match. Somehow, I doubt we'll see "Lance Russell's Baxter suit passed away" or "Jimmy Valiant, I'm gonna go through you like Ex-Lax through a widow woman". There's probably enough out there to put together a DVD set consisting solely of promos. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 02:38, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Sorry that the Committee has to miss out on that Royal windfall. By way of sympathy here's a vintage clip for you (- yes that's only 38 years ago - he even had a satchel in those days, bless). Martinevans123 ( talk) 19:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
How are you?
Mr. Prophet ( talk) 19:04, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Please your completion fill out this Articles The volleyball team and other players. Development volleyball in wikipedia Are waiting you. Good luck. Jacilason ( talk) 21:01, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
I just want to thank you for your edits on the 2015 Waco shootout article. Several of them look very good to me. I came here to ask if you're interested in editing another article I created, specifically, this article about the recent family murder in Washington, D.C. I took about 30 minutes to create it, and I am pleased with how it turned out, but I think it could use more, so I'm just asking if you'd like to add any new information on the murders, I'd be happy to take the help. Thanks. :) SilverSurfingSerpant ( talk) 21:26, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello there, I had a question about Victor the Wrestling Bear that I thought maybe you knew the answer. I am trying to add Victor to the "List of individual bears" page for now (hopefully me or someone else will eventually write an article on him, there is certainly no shortage of source material). I understand Tuffy Truesdell had 2 Victors, an elder Victor who was actually a dark-furred Alaskan brown bear (i.e. grizzly bear) and a younger Victor who was a 700-pound black bear and Tuffy also took that one around to schools, etc. (Based on my admittedly basic knowledge of bear species, I can't imagine anyone taking a grizzly to visit a room full of school kids, but a black bear would probably be OK for that task, they tend to be fairly docile as long as you don't do anything stupid like pet them.) Apparently they both wrestled and the younger Victor was the one who bit off a guy's finger once near the end of his wrestling career.
So, here's my questions: 1) When and how did both Victors die? All I can find is that the authorities decided NOT to euthanize Victor the younger for the finger incident because they decided they didn't have legal jurisdiction or something.
2) I also read that one of the Victors died before a scheduled match and because lots of tickets had been sold, a guy in a bear suit filled in and wrestled that night. Which Victor was this and when/ where was the match? The story I read from a book left those details out.
If you have any info let me know...otherwise I imagine I will get to looking it up someday but it would be helpful to know in adding Victor to the bears page. Thanks! TheBlinkster ( talk) 04:22, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
...for the thanks :) DuncanHill ( talk) 23:16, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for sticking up for me. 82.28.140.226 ( talk) 22:48, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
(Continued here so as to not further derail the ref desk thread) You know, Tolkien stated adamantly several times that WWII had absolutely no effect on LOTR/Hobbit, and that there was in in no way any allegory there (essentially, I didn't look up the interviews before posting this). But I still don't buy it. I don't think you can see many of your closest friends die and your country bombed for years and not have that affect your writing. He can deny allegorical intent, but he can't deny that an allegorical reading is there. We're also talking about a guy who wrote an entire children's book about the editorial panel of the OED ( Farmer Giles of Ham see also here [4] where he basically says that he can't/won't write fun light-hearted stories anymore because "the woods and plains are aerodromes and bomb-practice targets"). So we know he can lay down one thing that looks like another without any problem at all. Hence, we're at a bit of an impasse - we can't believe him, but we can't disbelieve him either. The way out, IMO, is to distinguish content and aboutness from intent.
Authorial intent, in my mind, is not the sole determiner of what something is about, it's only the sole determiner of intent. As you know, things can come out sometimes that we didn't really intend... As for Puff, probably the only thing keeping me from putting it in the same category as LOTR allegory is that I haven't yet read the poem that it was based upon. And anyway, if they wanted to make a song with veiled drug references, they'd have done a much better job. Or maybe not, depends on you feel about the line from I Dig Rock and Roll Music - "But if I really say it, the radio won't play it/ Unless I lay it between the lines."
As for aboutness, our article doesn't really do it justice, I can probably dig up a better read on that if you're interested. As I understand the term, it is much broader than the notion of subject, and probably necessarily more flexible. For instance, this song is about more than its subject [5], right? SemanticMantis ( talk) 20:04, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Behold. "The only vinyl record with a health warning and the only double B-side", indeed. I think the last time I ever heard this was in the vicinity of two or three decades ago. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 00:59, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
(→Reactions: Not buring him for being a Paul, just because he had nothing to do with the city.) InedibleHulk, y u remove my Rand Paul edits when two other presidential candidates' comments are already included? He has polled higher than both in various polls. Or do you only care what a Clinton or a Bush has to say? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.95.187.124 ( talk) 19:50, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
I'm commenting here so as not to continue cluttering up the talk page with a discussion of what is or isn't terrorism, but if you accept that Roof had an ideological motive (i.e., advancing white supremacy), and (assuming this is accurate) deliberately left a survivor alive to tell the world what had happened, I genuinely don't understand how you can dispute that the Charleston shooting was an act of terrorism. Dyrnych ( talk) 21:56, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Thx for the point Hulk ;-) And yes you are right, I appreciate George: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rh6qqsmxNs . Bye -- 91.10.39.5 ( talk) 21:30, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Ups, our childhood heroes were villains ;-) I knew right away something was wrong with you. ;-) ;-) In my musical gift that (uncommon utterly compelling countertenor) voice is picking on someone's bad habit:
I was gently rebembering me/us of that bad habit... The magic of Secos & Molhados is how they wove texts of important poets like Cassiano Ricardo, Manuel Bandeira, Solano Trindade and Vinícius de Moraes into song lyrics. Maybe you're right again. There is something very Japanese in that makeup from wrestler Keiji Mutoh & bard Ney Matogrosso. Noh & Kabuki. Japan is my marvellous dreamland of culture and aesthetics, where embracing fantasy in everyday life is acceptable. Traditional culture and urban subcultures, traditional arts & crafts and high tech, architecture, gardening and the well-mannered people. And the food. The food. I love Washoku (traditional Japanese home cuisine) & my Wabocho (traditional style kitchen knives)... à propos, there's one song for Japan/Hiroshima on that first legendary album: A Rosa de Hiroxima, Vinícius de Moraes, Rio de Janeiro, 1954. A pacifist and antinuclear poem.
There is so much to love in Japanese culture, it even developed the Art of Peace between the both World Wars. Aikido - the Art of Fighting without Fighting, not being competitive, a way of life shaped by Morihei Ueshiba. Aikido uses the dynamic forces of geometry, bio-mechanics and mental & spiritual cultivation to create a unique examination of confrontations of all kinds. The Essence is to accept the spirit of the universe, keep the peace of the world, correctly produce, protect and cultivate all beings in nature. The Essence of Aike is love. My cup of sophistication, ☮ & ♥ -- 91.10.43.139 ( talk) 17:18, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Since you commented in the discussion at Talk:Charleston church shooting, I invite you to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Presidential candidates reactions to the Charleston church shooting. Thanks, Reywas92 Talk 00:04, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Talk:Death of Eric Garner#15 seconds. Thanks.
Pishcal —
♣
21:31, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Hey. I just noticed the comment you made on the talk page thread, and it makes a whole lot more sense than Ianmacm ( talk), who seems to think wikipedia should help support mainstream media.. I am treading cautiously as I add, because 98.207.226.90 ( talk) is liable to delete all adds. Since you have more experience than me, is there any reason I should avoid amending the conspiracy section as I have indicated I believe serves the article best? Thanks Ferociouslettuce ( talk) 15:21, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Intriguing argument indeed. I've left a reply on my page. I genuinely sympathize with either classification or non-classification but it seems this is a grey area. Regards-- Kieronoldham ( talk) 01:42, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
This is of course all putting aside what seems to be consensus among the thousands of people who have read this article over the prv. months. Regards, -- Kieronoldham ( talk) 03:22, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an
edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at
Charleston church shooting. Although repeatedly
reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges.
Please obtain consensus on these categories rather than trying to "force through" your edits; several editors have disagreed with your assessment on the talk page. VQuakr ( talk) 03:44, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Please
assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on
2012 Aurora shooting. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia.
"My case"!?. Oy. Read up on policy more before you continue editing, please.
VQuakr (
talk)
04:08, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:WWF Light Heavyweight belt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:40, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cremation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ash. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:49, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
I think it's this: [7] he's referring to. It took me a while to find it too. Connormah ( talk) 22:39, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I'm new to joining in on discussions and editing a Wikipedia page. I would never do so if I did not in fact know an edit is warranted. I would appreciate some help in this matter. I did not mean to post a debate publicly if I had. I would like to be in the know of a senior member as I believe I am in fact correct about an issue of an "edit war". Thank you so kindly :) Robyn MacEachern ( talk) 05:34, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi I have some screen shots showing validity of Ann Rule's date of birth. How would I send these to you to show validity of my editing the page? Thank you kindly! :) Robyn MacEachern ( talk) 05:57, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I won't edit anymore. This person is obviously on a huge power trip weilding his authority around and has had the page locked down by somebody else. I don't understand why people can't edit the page with full knowledge they are correct on an issue. He obviously had the need to be right or politically correct. I will keep my account open but I will never again attempt to edit the pages as I now see the Hell a person can get for attempting to do so. I appreciate your stepping up and attempting to see my point in the matter. I don't see how it was an issue in the first place; over an author's birth year. Good God. Never again will I try to edit a Wikipedia page. Thank you so much :) Robyn MacEachern ( talk) 06:35, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
don't understand why people can't edit the page with full knowledge they are correct on an issue- In a nutshell, the reason is that many people have full knowledge they are correct on an issue, and yet are incorrect. Not saying that's you, but we have to have one set of rules for all. ― Mandruss ☎ 07:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. We were both working on the Roddy Piper entry at the same time. I tweaked it so that it referenced his work in the NWA and WCW, bith which were very significant to his career. (I grew up watching him Wrestle in Portland, OR in the 1970s). I fixed his entry so that it matched the format of the Dusty Rhodes entry (June 11). Doing this allows for just the one mention of "Hall of Fame", however I went back and checked and the Professional Wrestling Hall of Fame is not included in any entries of past deceased wrestlers including Rhodes and Verne Gagne, who also died this year. It is unfortunate as this I believe is more prestigious than the WWE Hall-of-Fame which basically is an empty honor and often used as a marketing tool.
Piper entry: Roddy Piper, 61, Canadian Hall of Fame professional wrestler (WWE, NWA, WCW) and actor (They Live, Hell Comes to Frogtown, Body Slam), heart attack.
Rhodes entry: Dusty Rhodes, 69, American Hall of Fame professional wrestler, booker (NWA, WCW, WWE) and promoter (TCW), kidney failure.
Your thoughts? (By the way, have you given up on Douglas Cook? I hope not.) BurienBomber ( talk) 05:24, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Well, this is something. Talking shit about me behind my back, as if I edit to be an asshole specifically to you two or something. Is this a new Justice League or something? You two band together to double up and revert my edits if you disagree with me? You want civility with me, I can give civility, but not if this type of crap is going on.
To address some things:
It's no secret I come off as generally annoyed or pissed off about something. It's because I scarcely feel like i'm in a collaborative atmosphere. People act as if i'm an unregistered Ip coming in and writing "Justin Bieber sucks dicks" on his page. I get treat like an asshole, so over time I started acting like an asshole. It doesn't mean I don't want to discuss or collaborate. But if this is going on, where i'm being talked about behind my back and being assumed to be editing things to what I like, it's going to make discussing and collaborating with people who don't seem to like me that much harder. Rusted AutoParts 18:14, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Murray Maxwell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi! The source that you quote ("The Tweed Shire council is working against the clock to finish erosion protection works that will hopefully save the surf club" That' certainly suggests a current problem.) is 5 years old. Thankfully the surf club was saved and is under no threat. I have no strong feelings about the wording of the sentence, but I think it suggests that beach is currently eroded. Anyways, I leave it in your capable hands. Doctorhawkes ( talk) 08:51, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Teamwork Barnstar |
Thank you for participating in the mass effort to improve Roddy Piper's article so it could be featured on the main page as an RD. We did it! starship .paint ~ KO 01:58, 7 August 2015 (UTC) |
I still think your signature is ugly, but I enjoyed reading your commentary on ANI. Drmies ( talk) 02:40, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:17, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Norman Fell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spin-off. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
This is how it described the early career of Yoshiaki Yatsu, upon returning from his excursion in the United States:
The Scrape the excess meat squeezing the body, when you return home to become Horny, 1983 in Choshu force led by " Restoration Army to enter the ", it has been attracting attention as a young samurai of the Meiji Restoration Army.
Okay then. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 10:14, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Your recent contributions look constructive except for
this one, which looks like petty vandalism. Can you explain what you intended there? Thanks,
alanyst 04:31, 2 September 2015 (UTC) Never mind, I misread the diff in light of your edit summary, and thought you had dropped the "i"; hence the "vandalism" remark, which I now retract. Apologies.
alanyst
04:34, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
I've replied here to avoid WP:NOTAFORUM. In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, Flanagan's estate owns the copyright on the video. Whether anyone is interested in enforcing it is another matter. WP:NFCC is strict and does not allow arguments like "the copyright holder won't mind" etc. Flanagan uploaded the video to Twitter and Facebook, which would have given them some licensing rights for commercial use. [8] If Flanagan had been really smart, he would have uploaded the video to Commons and made it public domain. Also, he could have posted his suicide manifesto online instead of sending it as a fax. As a result, it is not possible to read the full 23-page document, only the extracts that the media has decided to publish.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 08:45, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Hey InedibleHulk. Regarding WP:RDM#Name of fetish?, I thought that SemanticMantis's response was great, as by answering it most quickly dismisses what seems likely a trolling question. I'd like to remove the follow-up (baseball-bug-itis) just an edit summary of " Wikipedia:No personal attacks", and would like permission to remove your reply to that comment at the same time. Cheers. -- ToE 12:58, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Nevermind. BB removed the entire thing. -- ToE 13:04, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, appropos of your recent response but not relevant to the thread- I thought you might like this quote from Tom Lehrer:
“ | Lehrer's song "The Old Dope Peddler" is sampled in rapper 2 Chainz's song "Dope Peddler", on his 2012 debut album, Based on a T.R.U. Story. The following year, Lehrer said he was "very proud" to have his song sampled "literally sixty years after I recorded it." Lehrer went on to describe his official response to the request to use his song: "As sole copyright owner of 'The Old Dope Peddler', I grant you motherfuckers permission to do this. Please give my regards to Mr. Chainz, or may I call him 2?" | ” |
SemanticMantis ( talk) 14:37, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phoenix Jones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strikeforce. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:29, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
I need help saving Little Miss Nobody from deletion. Urgently. LMN is Arizona's Boy in the Box. Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 00:22, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
No, this is a banned user and known troll. He's not looking to be educated. He's been around a while, we get rid of his stuff every day or two. Let it drop. -- Jayron 32 01:49, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi InedibleHulk, it should be noted that Bill McDermott continued working even after his accident. Would it be possible to clarify this in the article?
Despite the accident, Bill continued his work as CEO, attending important meetings and conferences. [1],, [2] [3] Harper70 ( talk) 19:32, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Harper70
Thanks so much for your time and for making the edits, Inedible Hulk!
In the interest of clarity, I think it’s quite important to note that Bill never stopped working, and his commitment to the company, its employees and shareholders remained resolute outside of just attending teleconferences. I know this article is in German, but it notes McDermott managed the company from afar.. [4]
Again, another German article, but the Financial Times Europe piece notes that SAP’s business was not affected.. [5]
The October reference in the original article was in McDermott’s ability to travel again, which is obviously beginning tomorrow. There were no restrictions on his ability to work following his surgery.
Would replacing the final sentence of the Personal Life section with “He continued leading SAP during his recuperation and is cleared to travel again as of October 1” be possible. Happy to discuss further! Thanks again. Harper70 ( talk) 19:29, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Harper70
Thank you!! Your edit definitely provides more clarity. I really appreciate your help! Harper70 ( talk) 22:54, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Harper70
Hi again, now that Bill McDermott has been back at HQ for a few months, would it be possible to delete the reference to the October timeframe? It would be great to update the article for readers. Thank you so much. Harper70 ( talk) 18:06, 18 December 2015 (UTC)Harper70
References
InedibleHulk, repent! ( Your Vandalism on last September 2 ) Your excellent https://www.google.ca/search?q=%22sources+say%22&tbs=qdr:d,sbd:1&tbm=nws dropped off some time between 09:15, 2 October 2015 (UTC) and 09:37, 2 October 2015 (UTC). I expect my computer to keeping on running - more on this, perhaps, later. Regards, Askedonty ( talk) 10:09, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
About Murder of the Grimes sisters... not being an Elvis Presley historian, I've just realised that the statement was probably not made by Elvis himself but rather by his "people" as Presley himself would have been far too busy. Not being certain, I'm wondering what call i should make as to what to do? Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 09:12, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
I am going to sleep, I want to further discuss the incidents you wanted to delete. (comment by Bolter21)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rebellion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boss. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:59, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Well, it turned out to be rather pointless and unsubstantiated now that this reaction has come to light, so I'm reverting the edits done and will wait until a proper consensus is reached. Versus001 ( talk) 06:05, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
I moved Murder of Ramona Moore back. Consider it this way: would you insist on retitling Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum theft under the same logic, that no one has been tried for the crime so therefore we can't say it's a theft without ruining their presumption of innocence? If so, what alternative title would you have in mind—" 1990 unauthorized removal of artwork from the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum", perhaps? (And please don't actually do this)
Also, if someone is tried for murder but winds up pleading to, or getting convicted of, manslaughter instead, what should we do? Retitle the article "Manslaughter of ..."? I'd like to know. Daniel Case ( talk) 06:27, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
"Homicide" is a distinction without a difference ... most people see the term and impute intent, despite the fact that technically it applies to self-defense and accidental killings of one person by another as well as murder.
Simply referring to someone's killing as a murder is not inherently libelous as you seem to think (unless you've gotten some case law somewhere to back you up; please share it if you do). What would be libelous is text in the article stating that a particular person did it before a conviction or confession to that effect (and in the former case we should always say "X was convicted of the crime" if they are still protesting their innocence or have not confessed). Legal niceties notwithstanding, "murder" is the most commonly used term for any killing found by investigative authorities to have occurred as a result of deliberate action by another.
I should add that in my state, New York, first-degree murder requires merely that the state prove intent (as well some other special situations), and second-degree murder also requires intent but covers a lot of other situations, including "the influence of extreme emotional disturbance for which there was a reasonable explanation or excuse, in other words what most people think is codified as manslaughter. Manslaughter is reserved for cases where the accused may have not intended to kill the victim but used force so recklessly against him (or with, as the prosecutors on Law & Order are always wont to try and argue, "depraved indifference"). So "murder" at least in New York where the Ramona Moore case took place, covers quite a bit of potential activity.
Using "murder" in the title of articles about deaths believed to have been deliberately caused fits with our naming conventions: "The title is one that readers are likely to look or search for and that editors would naturally use to link to the article from other articles. Such a title usually conveys what the subject is actually called in English." See, also, WP:RECOGNIZABLE, on the same page: "Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's 'official' name as an article title; it generally prefers to use the name that is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable sources." So, when the media starts using "homicide" more frequently, then we can and will. But not until. We reflect the world, we don't take it upon ourselves to change it to any greater extent than trying to put the sum of human knowledge at everyone's fingertips would.
I will grant some exceptions (exceptions that prove the rule) to "murder of ..." as a title:
Daniel Case ( talk) 15:46, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
http://www.exploreforensics.co.uk/blunt-force-trauma.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1882786
"Beaten" is NOT a scientific term...its just not....ever. Sunnydoo ( talk) 11:11, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Re this, I'll give you credit for knowing that it's not worth much. But I wonder whether you considered that many editors are better at counting than weighing, including, I believe, some in that discussion. Why complicate matters unnecessarily? ― Mandruss ☎ 21:16, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
I reverted that. "To protest" was originally synonymous in every context with "to proclaim" (scroll down here), and perhaps since legal usages change so slowly, if it all, "protesting one's innocence" is the only context in which it retains that meaning. See No. 2 under our definition of the verb at Wiktionary, as well as other online dictionaries, plus other such usages). Daniel Case ( talk) 15:30, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
I decided to take "disappearance" out; as her body has been recovered and neither Bonie nor anyone else has been charged with kidnapping or abducting her (yet), so there's no point in repeating a journalist's attempt to be melodramatic in their copy (I know, I was there once) when we can get the same point across with better use of the language. Daniel Case ( talk) 15:40, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
I took a second look at that thing (the ADD comes and goes) and learned that (1) it wasn't a criticism of you as I first thought, and (2) they stole some of my comments (I'm considering suing them for COPYVIO ;). (Guess I can't if they attributed them, on second thought.) Gossip-loving parasites. ― Mandruss ☎ 00:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Look, I now realize that I should have said, "Should I start an RfC on this?". I said it wrong, I apologize, but that fact doesn't outweigh status quo ante. Yeah, it's getting funkier, I agree. ― Mandruss ☎ 00:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Urraca Mesa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black bear. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:54, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I have reverted the edits you made last month to the Ronald Goldman article, as they clearly violate Wikipedia policy, along with common sense. Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman were indeed murdered, as a question of documented fact. The fact that O.J. Simpson was found liable in a wrongful death suit does not mean that there were "no murders", as you stated in your edit summary, since "wrongful death" is a legal term used in civil trials, and is not mutually exclusive from murder. Lastly, we do use terms like "alleged", as explained at WP:ALLEGED. Having amassed over 34,000 edits here since 2006, you should know these things by now. Nightscream ( talk) 13:04, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Central discussion has started; I invite you to improve consensus. -- George Ho ( talk) 23:02, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Hilarious Username |
Your username is quite amusing. Thanks for the chuckle! GrammarFascist contribs talk 17:45, 28 October 2015 (UTC) |
I changed my indentation and adjusted yours as well. Letting you know in case you want to unindent your comment. μηδείς ( talk) 21:19, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
I love your edit summaries and sometimes random comments and whatnot. Super funny. lol Cra sh Underride 05:07, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic UFC 193. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! This is George Ho actually ( Talk) 20:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Please read this notification carefully:
A
community decision has authorised the use of
general sanctions for pages related to the
Syrian Civil War and the
Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described
here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a
one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described
here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The image of the perpetrator is nominated as FFD. I invite you for commentary. -- George Ho ( talk) 19:34, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. In the interest of avoiding an edit war in Holly Holm, especially over something as silly as this, I want to politely point out that no one needs to find "one example of usage" in order to "have a leg to stand on." I only need to cite Wikipedia policy, which I've done.
But since you asked, check out the last sentence in the first paragraph of "Bantamweight championship" -- right above one of the hyphens that you've been removing.
". . .ending Rousey's undefeated streak and three-year reign as champion."
In that case, "three-year" is being used as an adjective for "reign," just like "combat-sports" is being used as an adjective for "history" below. This is a proper use of a hyphen, and there is no reason to keep removing it. If "Combat Sports" was captalized, then there would be no need for the hyphen, but it isn't, and shouldn't be. Of course, I'm not perfect. If you know of a Wikipedia policy that contradicts this, please cite it, and I'll respect that. I hope this resolves things. -- James26 ( talk) 02:16, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
[9] I didn't delete it because it was trolling, I deleted it because it was a stupid thing to say. -- Viennese Waltz 09:19, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Undid revision 692662431 by Diblidabliduu (talk) One man's "often" is another's "sometimes". "Has been" is clear enough.
Okay.
But does that mean there should be no "often" words visible on any politically volatile article, because it's not "unbiased" to have that? ( link) -- Diblidabliduu ( talk) 22:50, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy New Year! | |
Best wishes for a wonderful 2016!----
WV ●
✉
✓
00:08, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Goodness, this page needs archiving...lol -- Mr. Zoot Cig Bunner ( talk) 21:29, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
James JohnsonThis was my original point removing Portland. There is reasonable differentiation between his tenures with Cleveland (where he was a 2-time all-star) and Seattle (where he had his longest tenure and on a title) to just include those two. He had nearly identical tenures with Portland and Houston so it is silly to A) add one just to make it three entries, or B) list 3 of 4 total teams with an arbitrary cutoff. I get what you are saying about limits - so just leave it at Cleveland and Seattle and be done with it. Rikster2 ( talk) 17:28, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
A kitten for you!Here's a fierce jungle kitty for you and your wonderful sense of humor.
Crash
Under
ride
21:47, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Bloody FreakHey man, how are you? Take a look at this guy's contributions. He simply ignores sources based on that blind belief "per Sherdog". One that even elevates Sherdog to a x-ray doctor robot. Not only that, but he believes Sherdog can state a fight ended due to a "esophagus injury" and no source can remove that, even the ones that clearly can and are listed there. Funny thing is that he says this to a user on today's event page: The jaw did break but the submission was just a neck crank. You wouldn't say "Submission (broken arm due to armbar)". So you can't say that, but you can use Sherdog diagnosis on Oliveira's fight? Incredible how he can contradict himself like that though. What's your take on this? It seems clear he needs more people to show him that through a consensus. Gsfelipe94 ( talk) 06:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
ship versus boatThe Cutty Sark is a ship, not a boat - as per your edit summary. The difference, with exceptions, is size. A boat is a watercraft that can be lifted out of the water (often with some sort of mechanical equipment). Sorry to be picky.... And, incidentally, suffer has a number of related meanings - it does not just mean "experience pain/some other bad feeling". An online dictionary has a good example: "The business suffers from lack of capital." ThoughtIdRetired ( talk) 18:31, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
|
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Yes. Yes, it does. Better than a blank page. InedibleHulk (talk) 22:12, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
( talk page stalker), but you already knew that – Back to wrestling for a sec, I watched Raw for the first time in a long time recently when I visited some friends and they had it on. Just before I was about to leave, Ryback comes out and one of them exclaims "Hey, look, it's Goldberg!". It was good for a quick laugh. In the previous segment, they showed this great close-up shot of Bray Wyatt. I wanted to blurt out "Wow, Blackjack Mulligan has much different facial hair!", but I knew that I would have completely lost them with that remark.
Anyway...I came across Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not/BJAODN the other day. I added something at the bottom which may be of interest/amusement to you. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 04:45, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
I am pissed. Wanna get Reigns over? Let him steal Sin Cara/Hunico's coolest move. starship .paint ~ ¡Olé! 06:00, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello!
Happy New Year!
Hope you good.
I was wondering if you can help me?
I need this section rewritten based in the link ( /info/en/?search=User_talk:Russell.mo#Rewriting_required). Can you help. A lot tried to help, I keep on muddling it up. I thought of you today...
( Russell.mo ( talk) 07:36, 9 January 2015 (UTC))
Haha! Me too, since 1980. Perhaps we should form a club with very strict rules.... μηδείς ( talk) 05:39, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
I'm not trying to beat you up or anything, it's just that there's such a thing as too much detail. Y2J is wrestling right now - let's deal with what he does when his current tour of duty ends when we get there.
Vjmlhds (talk) 00:19, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
you need this kind of reassurance, as I'm certain you do not, what with your hat strategically tipped below one eye and your other eye in the mirror as you watch yourself go by, but just in case: you are not meant and it doesn't fit. I find your contributions refreshing, even when off-topic, just don't wish to feed your oversized muscular green vanity, so no barnstar, soz. --- Sluzzelin talk 00:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
What you upto?
I'm tired and bored bro, doing my work 24/7. Thought of you again! Anything fun to do/you do, where you can join me?
( Russell.mo ( talk) 18:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC))
Yeah, you are right about COD (lol). I got GTA San Andreas. I loved Mortal Kombat, I played it in Sega Mega drive 2. Mortal Kombat Armageddon seems like it consist most of the characters, view List_of_Mortal_Kombat_characters#Character_overview, I'll search for it and buy it when I get the time. I've only played a Boxing game in Play Station 2, I think it was an EA Sports game, I'm not sure. I don't mind UFC, I'll search for it when I'm searching 'MK A'. I like fighting. I am very good at it in real life, though always get defeated when it comes to it, for 3 reasons, 1) secret, 2) secret, 3) I can take my revenge in the afterlife. I have saved a few games to play in the near future because my Laptop is in 32bit mode, it doesn't allow me to play any good games because of it. I can't change it to 64bit because of the Antivirus system installed (not a great one, but will last forever. In other words, until the person who gave it changes their company). I got it from Canada btw. I've been their for 3 months. Though someone from Wikipedia advised MSE, I still fear for virus issues from my past experiences. I cannot afford to lose this AV system anyway even in the near future because the Laptop was given to me as a gift by my dear ones. Its the most valuable thing I have in my life now, along with some extras that I bought to go with it.
In the near future (about 3 years or so) , when my work is finished, when I'm in a better situation, hopefully I'll have a home, new PC and internet (and definitely be back home then), I'll give you King of Fighters, I have all of them. 97, 98, 99 will never grow old and will turn into gold... I'll also let you know before I depart this country I'm in now, if you want any games/softwares. I'll get them and upload it to you...
( Russell.mo ( talk) 13:30, 20 January 2015 (UTC))
Hi; as you know I've stayed away from "that article" and its evil twin since all the fracas; don't know if you've noticed "his" hostile vote-call against me on an ANI whose subject he has nothing to do with, but note this re the missing archives from Oct 23 to November 14.....whaaaaat?!. Something's not right in wiki-land. But that's nothing new, either huh? Skookum1 ( talk) 10:07, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Elizium23. Your recent edit to the page
Pope Benedict XVI appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please
cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Benedict is still alive. Do not imply he is dead by using "was"
Elizium23 (
talk)
18:53, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
There is nothing for me to say. I guess people who know you, would understand what this means... Russell.mo ( talk) 19:37, 29 January 2015 (UTC) |
Sorry about the EC. I thought I'd avoided it.
Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie |
Say Shalom! 13 Shevat 5775
18:40, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for what you did at Talk:Anthony Johnson (fighter). Could you please leave a support or oppose vote on the page? Your opinion is highly valued. As well, do you believe consensus has been reached? Thanks again. WWE Batman131 ( talk) 23:34, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
I didn't know that day/month/year was British, WP:YR lists it first, I find it superior because we save on the comma. Ranze ( talk) 00:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Please comment at Talk:WrestleMania 32. Thanks. starship .paint ~ ¡Olé! 12:14, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Being as you've previously made edits to the Tony Blinken article, I was hoping you could look at some changes I've suggested for the page on the Talk Page. Since I work at a public relations agency, and since Tony Blinken is a personal friend of one of the principals at my PR firm, my making the changes directly could easily be seen as a conflict of interest, so I'm making my appeal to you.
I've gone ahead and offered suggested edits with solid sourcing for the page's career section; I've also addressed the need for new citations needed elsewhere in the article. Would you take a look and see if these changes are acceptable?
Thanks in advance!
( Bgluckman ( talk) 17:26, 19 February 2015 (UTC))
Hulk, I was just wondering ... has there been a main event winner at WrestleMania who was booed out of the building before? Other than at WrestleMania X-Seven when Austin turned? starship .paint ~ ¡Olé! 05:31, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
After this, I would pay to watch a Lesnar-Reigns shoot. Whoever said Brock couldn't talk was lying. On another note... starship .paint ~ ¡Olé! 07:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
(Note to any Twitter followers Robby Redpaw may have: Nobody calls on me to remove anything below. It's not even a hidden message, so don't feel stupid if you can't see it. Feel stupid for following Robby Redpaw.) InedibleHulk (talk) 09:16, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello! You have previously made edits to pages related to Ontario. I was hoping you could look at some changes I would like to suggest for the Ontario Ombudsman page. I work at the Ontario Ombudsman's Office; we are an independent office that investigates public complaints in Ontario. Since I work there, my making changes directly may be seen as a conflict of interest. I noted that another user had previously asked you to look at suggested edits, so I wanted to request the same. In the past I have made some edits to the page to correct inaccuracies, but I thought I should seek an independent third party to ensure my edits are acceptable to the Wiki community.
I will make the edits and post them on my personal User page in the coming few days if you're amenable to looking at them. I really appreciate your consideration in this. Thank you in advance. Abursey ( talk) 20:39, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you...for taking a look. Appreciate that. I'll let you know when something is posted. Abursey ( talk) 20:44, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
And just in case you're interested... Abursey ( talk) 21:23, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
We've also noticed similar edits on this page, which is a BLP. /info/en/?search=André_Marin Abursey ( talk) 21:31, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi InedibleHulk,
Saw your note about single purpose accounts re editing the O Ontario Ombudsman and Andre Marin pages. Both myself Thissilladia ( talk) 00:23, 1 March 2015 (UTC) and my partner FriendlyBillingsgate are new to Wikipedia and were not planning on spending so much time on on subject. However, it was so unbalanced, that is where I have ended-up (my partner has had enough and quit Wiki).
In all my editing I have attempted to cite clearly, accurately and copiously. As for the rumour, gossip, etc. edits without citations, or inserts into my edits so it looks like my citations cover their insertions, I have no idea about those.
Thanks for helping to balance these pages and for the helpful notes in your changes. Thissilladia ( talk) 00:23, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. FriendlyBillingsgate ( talk) 22:11, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I sometimes wonder if anyone has ever actually tried to eat you. Were you a willing participant in this rather intimate culinary event? What part did they choose first? How long did they chew you before determining you were inedible? Were you cooked first, or did they just take a chunk out of your raw body? Were you awake during the meal? Were you served with vegetables, or chips and salad? Did you need medical treatment afterwards? What caused you to become inedible, when the rest of us apparently taste much like chicken? Or is it that you just call yourself InedibleHulk in order to fend off those who view you with slavering mouths and gleeful eyes? How do you know their interest isn't just sexual? (not that that's anything to be downplayed, but it is rather less controversial than human cannibalism). Or maybe their consumption of your flesh was actually part of an interesting new sexual ritual? Have you ever performed culinary masturbation, by eating yourself for the purposes of sexual arousal? So many questions, so little time. If any of this is too personal to share openly, you can always email me. :) -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 19:20, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
The obvious next question is whether "big" also stacks. The answer: Yes, it does. That's something we probably don't want getting around, unless we want to make it easier for jerks to out themselves as such (maybe not a bad thing). ― Mandruss ☎ 13:38, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Please be careful not to accidentally violate WP:BEAN. Further accidents of this nature will result in this fluffball being removed from your talk page. You're also the first person ever to receive a kitten threat!
Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie |
Say Shalom! 12 Adar 5775
19:14, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
InedibleHulk moved my comment and then Itsmejudith left an unsigned comment. I have both reversed the moval and signed the unsignature. If either of you wishes to change this, feel free, but please don't move my comment again; double indenture is the proper method if you wish to add a comment above a prior comment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Medeis ( talk • contribs)
Thanks for improvements you've been doing at Ecological footprint; Lotsa good fixes there, keep it up! NewsAndEventsGuy ( talk) 00:13, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Does it really matter why the inductees were inducted by a certain person? Including it for every entry seems pointless and just takes up space. Besides, Larry Zbyszko (for example) isn't being inducted by Sammartino because they "Headlined final Showdown at Shea in a steel cage match". It's because he was trained by Sammartino and the two were associated for years before they had their feud which was considered one of the all-time classics and they were good friends. To say otherwise is misrepresentation. Also, let's say you do this for every single entry. Bret Hart was inducted by Steve Austin and the two had an amazing match at WM13. The problem is that this wasn't the only match the two had and Bret Hart headlined 3 WrestleManias and countless other pay-per-views. Why should that one match (as magnificent as it was) be singled out simply because Austin was chosen to induct him? -- Scorpion 0422 17:22, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() | On 28 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kayla Mueller, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that ISIL hostage Kayla Mueller once participated in the International Solidarity Movement in defending the homes of Palestinians? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kayla Mueller. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
I find it offensive to add Justin Roberts' butt hurt blog on here because he shamed the award and legacy of Ultimate Warrior. He is upset that WWE let him go and stopped including him on festivities held for Connor. I don't mind Connor because everybody has their opinions on that little boy. To give you an example lots of people keep asking why was he picked there are a lots of kids battling cancer. My issue is Justin Roberts got butt hurt so he had to write his blog and accuse WWE of milking Connor's cancer battle. They do a lot for the community and teamed up with the Make a Wish foundation and the Susan B. Komen foundation to help fight cancer. I feel Roberts disrespected Ultimate Warrior in general. I don't know if facebook counts for something but when I mentioned he was butt hurt he banned me from his page instead of giving me a response. His blog does not belong in the WWE Hall of Fame Warrior Award section. Dana Warrior also gave her full support and input when establishing this award at Ultimate Warrior's request.
I understand all of that I just felt he disrespected Ultimate Warrior so I felt Roberts' input shouldn't be included. It's all good.
Hi, finally someone who tries to solve this the right way. Please see my sections on his talk page (december, a while ago) and (the newer) on ANI. Shmayo ( talk) 07:34, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Generic noun requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix ( talk) 00:30, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
I think we ought to talk about the revisions and our disagreements on the page's talk page before it is too late. Surely you agree?
/info/en/?search=Talk:Palestinian_rocket_attacks_on_Israel#Last_paragraph_of_overview
Iwant2write ( talk) 00:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
The article Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel, like all articles related to the Arab–Israeli conflict broadly construed, is subject to a one-revert restriction (1RR). You can read more about 1RR here. I encourage you to read about the rules that apply to all articles related to the Arab–Israeli conflict broadly construed here. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 02:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.— Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 02:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
While this Freddie Gray thing rages on and on, I see that the Orioles and White Sox are going to have an "empty arena match", presumably for security reasons. While I don't find baseball to be as boring as many others do, I can't imagine that this could possibly stack up to the original. Speaking of the original, I also noticed that WWE is advertising a forthcoming Lawler DVD set, which includes that match. Somehow, I doubt we'll see "Lance Russell's Baxter suit passed away" or "Jimmy Valiant, I'm gonna go through you like Ex-Lax through a widow woman". There's probably enough out there to put together a DVD set consisting solely of promos. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 02:38, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Sorry that the Committee has to miss out on that Royal windfall. By way of sympathy here's a vintage clip for you (- yes that's only 38 years ago - he even had a satchel in those days, bless). Martinevans123 ( talk) 19:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
How are you?
Mr. Prophet ( talk) 19:04, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Please your completion fill out this Articles The volleyball team and other players. Development volleyball in wikipedia Are waiting you. Good luck. Jacilason ( talk) 21:01, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
I just want to thank you for your edits on the 2015 Waco shootout article. Several of them look very good to me. I came here to ask if you're interested in editing another article I created, specifically, this article about the recent family murder in Washington, D.C. I took about 30 minutes to create it, and I am pleased with how it turned out, but I think it could use more, so I'm just asking if you'd like to add any new information on the murders, I'd be happy to take the help. Thanks. :) SilverSurfingSerpant ( talk) 21:26, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello there, I had a question about Victor the Wrestling Bear that I thought maybe you knew the answer. I am trying to add Victor to the "List of individual bears" page for now (hopefully me or someone else will eventually write an article on him, there is certainly no shortage of source material). I understand Tuffy Truesdell had 2 Victors, an elder Victor who was actually a dark-furred Alaskan brown bear (i.e. grizzly bear) and a younger Victor who was a 700-pound black bear and Tuffy also took that one around to schools, etc. (Based on my admittedly basic knowledge of bear species, I can't imagine anyone taking a grizzly to visit a room full of school kids, but a black bear would probably be OK for that task, they tend to be fairly docile as long as you don't do anything stupid like pet them.) Apparently they both wrestled and the younger Victor was the one who bit off a guy's finger once near the end of his wrestling career.
So, here's my questions: 1) When and how did both Victors die? All I can find is that the authorities decided NOT to euthanize Victor the younger for the finger incident because they decided they didn't have legal jurisdiction or something.
2) I also read that one of the Victors died before a scheduled match and because lots of tickets had been sold, a guy in a bear suit filled in and wrestled that night. Which Victor was this and when/ where was the match? The story I read from a book left those details out.
If you have any info let me know...otherwise I imagine I will get to looking it up someday but it would be helpful to know in adding Victor to the bears page. Thanks! TheBlinkster ( talk) 04:22, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
...for the thanks :) DuncanHill ( talk) 23:16, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for sticking up for me. 82.28.140.226 ( talk) 22:48, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
(Continued here so as to not further derail the ref desk thread) You know, Tolkien stated adamantly several times that WWII had absolutely no effect on LOTR/Hobbit, and that there was in in no way any allegory there (essentially, I didn't look up the interviews before posting this). But I still don't buy it. I don't think you can see many of your closest friends die and your country bombed for years and not have that affect your writing. He can deny allegorical intent, but he can't deny that an allegorical reading is there. We're also talking about a guy who wrote an entire children's book about the editorial panel of the OED ( Farmer Giles of Ham see also here [4] where he basically says that he can't/won't write fun light-hearted stories anymore because "the woods and plains are aerodromes and bomb-practice targets"). So we know he can lay down one thing that looks like another without any problem at all. Hence, we're at a bit of an impasse - we can't believe him, but we can't disbelieve him either. The way out, IMO, is to distinguish content and aboutness from intent.
Authorial intent, in my mind, is not the sole determiner of what something is about, it's only the sole determiner of intent. As you know, things can come out sometimes that we didn't really intend... As for Puff, probably the only thing keeping me from putting it in the same category as LOTR allegory is that I haven't yet read the poem that it was based upon. And anyway, if they wanted to make a song with veiled drug references, they'd have done a much better job. Or maybe not, depends on you feel about the line from I Dig Rock and Roll Music - "But if I really say it, the radio won't play it/ Unless I lay it between the lines."
As for aboutness, our article doesn't really do it justice, I can probably dig up a better read on that if you're interested. As I understand the term, it is much broader than the notion of subject, and probably necessarily more flexible. For instance, this song is about more than its subject [5], right? SemanticMantis ( talk) 20:04, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Behold. "The only vinyl record with a health warning and the only double B-side", indeed. I think the last time I ever heard this was in the vicinity of two or three decades ago. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 00:59, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
(→Reactions: Not buring him for being a Paul, just because he had nothing to do with the city.) InedibleHulk, y u remove my Rand Paul edits when two other presidential candidates' comments are already included? He has polled higher than both in various polls. Or do you only care what a Clinton or a Bush has to say? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.95.187.124 ( talk) 19:50, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
I'm commenting here so as not to continue cluttering up the talk page with a discussion of what is or isn't terrorism, but if you accept that Roof had an ideological motive (i.e., advancing white supremacy), and (assuming this is accurate) deliberately left a survivor alive to tell the world what had happened, I genuinely don't understand how you can dispute that the Charleston shooting was an act of terrorism. Dyrnych ( talk) 21:56, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Thx for the point Hulk ;-) And yes you are right, I appreciate George: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rh6qqsmxNs . Bye -- 91.10.39.5 ( talk) 21:30, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Ups, our childhood heroes were villains ;-) I knew right away something was wrong with you. ;-) ;-) In my musical gift that (uncommon utterly compelling countertenor) voice is picking on someone's bad habit:
I was gently rebembering me/us of that bad habit... The magic of Secos & Molhados is how they wove texts of important poets like Cassiano Ricardo, Manuel Bandeira, Solano Trindade and Vinícius de Moraes into song lyrics. Maybe you're right again. There is something very Japanese in that makeup from wrestler Keiji Mutoh & bard Ney Matogrosso. Noh & Kabuki. Japan is my marvellous dreamland of culture and aesthetics, where embracing fantasy in everyday life is acceptable. Traditional culture and urban subcultures, traditional arts & crafts and high tech, architecture, gardening and the well-mannered people. And the food. The food. I love Washoku (traditional Japanese home cuisine) & my Wabocho (traditional style kitchen knives)... à propos, there's one song for Japan/Hiroshima on that first legendary album: A Rosa de Hiroxima, Vinícius de Moraes, Rio de Janeiro, 1954. A pacifist and antinuclear poem.
There is so much to love in Japanese culture, it even developed the Art of Peace between the both World Wars. Aikido - the Art of Fighting without Fighting, not being competitive, a way of life shaped by Morihei Ueshiba. Aikido uses the dynamic forces of geometry, bio-mechanics and mental & spiritual cultivation to create a unique examination of confrontations of all kinds. The Essence is to accept the spirit of the universe, keep the peace of the world, correctly produce, protect and cultivate all beings in nature. The Essence of Aike is love. My cup of sophistication, ☮ & ♥ -- 91.10.43.139 ( talk) 17:18, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Since you commented in the discussion at Talk:Charleston church shooting, I invite you to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Presidential candidates reactions to the Charleston church shooting. Thanks, Reywas92 Talk 00:04, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Talk:Death of Eric Garner#15 seconds. Thanks.
Pishcal —
♣
21:31, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Hey. I just noticed the comment you made on the talk page thread, and it makes a whole lot more sense than Ianmacm ( talk), who seems to think wikipedia should help support mainstream media.. I am treading cautiously as I add, because 98.207.226.90 ( talk) is liable to delete all adds. Since you have more experience than me, is there any reason I should avoid amending the conspiracy section as I have indicated I believe serves the article best? Thanks Ferociouslettuce ( talk) 15:21, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Intriguing argument indeed. I've left a reply on my page. I genuinely sympathize with either classification or non-classification but it seems this is a grey area. Regards-- Kieronoldham ( talk) 01:42, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
This is of course all putting aside what seems to be consensus among the thousands of people who have read this article over the prv. months. Regards, -- Kieronoldham ( talk) 03:22, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an
edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at
Charleston church shooting. Although repeatedly
reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges.
Please obtain consensus on these categories rather than trying to "force through" your edits; several editors have disagreed with your assessment on the talk page. VQuakr ( talk) 03:44, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Please
assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on
2012 Aurora shooting. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia.
"My case"!?. Oy. Read up on policy more before you continue editing, please.
VQuakr (
talk)
04:08, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:WWF Light Heavyweight belt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:40, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cremation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ash. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:49, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
I think it's this: [7] he's referring to. It took me a while to find it too. Connormah ( talk) 22:39, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I'm new to joining in on discussions and editing a Wikipedia page. I would never do so if I did not in fact know an edit is warranted. I would appreciate some help in this matter. I did not mean to post a debate publicly if I had. I would like to be in the know of a senior member as I believe I am in fact correct about an issue of an "edit war". Thank you so kindly :) Robyn MacEachern ( talk) 05:34, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi I have some screen shots showing validity of Ann Rule's date of birth. How would I send these to you to show validity of my editing the page? Thank you kindly! :) Robyn MacEachern ( talk) 05:57, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I won't edit anymore. This person is obviously on a huge power trip weilding his authority around and has had the page locked down by somebody else. I don't understand why people can't edit the page with full knowledge they are correct on an issue. He obviously had the need to be right or politically correct. I will keep my account open but I will never again attempt to edit the pages as I now see the Hell a person can get for attempting to do so. I appreciate your stepping up and attempting to see my point in the matter. I don't see how it was an issue in the first place; over an author's birth year. Good God. Never again will I try to edit a Wikipedia page. Thank you so much :) Robyn MacEachern ( talk) 06:35, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
don't understand why people can't edit the page with full knowledge they are correct on an issue- In a nutshell, the reason is that many people have full knowledge they are correct on an issue, and yet are incorrect. Not saying that's you, but we have to have one set of rules for all. ― Mandruss ☎ 07:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. We were both working on the Roddy Piper entry at the same time. I tweaked it so that it referenced his work in the NWA and WCW, bith which were very significant to his career. (I grew up watching him Wrestle in Portland, OR in the 1970s). I fixed his entry so that it matched the format of the Dusty Rhodes entry (June 11). Doing this allows for just the one mention of "Hall of Fame", however I went back and checked and the Professional Wrestling Hall of Fame is not included in any entries of past deceased wrestlers including Rhodes and Verne Gagne, who also died this year. It is unfortunate as this I believe is more prestigious than the WWE Hall-of-Fame which basically is an empty honor and often used as a marketing tool.
Piper entry: Roddy Piper, 61, Canadian Hall of Fame professional wrestler (WWE, NWA, WCW) and actor (They Live, Hell Comes to Frogtown, Body Slam), heart attack.
Rhodes entry: Dusty Rhodes, 69, American Hall of Fame professional wrestler, booker (NWA, WCW, WWE) and promoter (TCW), kidney failure.
Your thoughts? (By the way, have you given up on Douglas Cook? I hope not.) BurienBomber ( talk) 05:24, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Well, this is something. Talking shit about me behind my back, as if I edit to be an asshole specifically to you two or something. Is this a new Justice League or something? You two band together to double up and revert my edits if you disagree with me? You want civility with me, I can give civility, but not if this type of crap is going on.
To address some things:
It's no secret I come off as generally annoyed or pissed off about something. It's because I scarcely feel like i'm in a collaborative atmosphere. People act as if i'm an unregistered Ip coming in and writing "Justin Bieber sucks dicks" on his page. I get treat like an asshole, so over time I started acting like an asshole. It doesn't mean I don't want to discuss or collaborate. But if this is going on, where i'm being talked about behind my back and being assumed to be editing things to what I like, it's going to make discussing and collaborating with people who don't seem to like me that much harder. Rusted AutoParts 18:14, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Murray Maxwell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi! The source that you quote ("The Tweed Shire council is working against the clock to finish erosion protection works that will hopefully save the surf club" That' certainly suggests a current problem.) is 5 years old. Thankfully the surf club was saved and is under no threat. I have no strong feelings about the wording of the sentence, but I think it suggests that beach is currently eroded. Anyways, I leave it in your capable hands. Doctorhawkes ( talk) 08:51, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Teamwork Barnstar |
Thank you for participating in the mass effort to improve Roddy Piper's article so it could be featured on the main page as an RD. We did it! starship .paint ~ KO 01:58, 7 August 2015 (UTC) |
I still think your signature is ugly, but I enjoyed reading your commentary on ANI. Drmies ( talk) 02:40, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:17, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Norman Fell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spin-off. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
This is how it described the early career of Yoshiaki Yatsu, upon returning from his excursion in the United States:
The Scrape the excess meat squeezing the body, when you return home to become Horny, 1983 in Choshu force led by " Restoration Army to enter the ", it has been attracting attention as a young samurai of the Meiji Restoration Army.
Okay then. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 10:14, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Your recent contributions look constructive except for
this one, which looks like petty vandalism. Can you explain what you intended there? Thanks,
alanyst 04:31, 2 September 2015 (UTC) Never mind, I misread the diff in light of your edit summary, and thought you had dropped the "i"; hence the "vandalism" remark, which I now retract. Apologies.
alanyst
04:34, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
I've replied here to avoid WP:NOTAFORUM. In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, Flanagan's estate owns the copyright on the video. Whether anyone is interested in enforcing it is another matter. WP:NFCC is strict and does not allow arguments like "the copyright holder won't mind" etc. Flanagan uploaded the video to Twitter and Facebook, which would have given them some licensing rights for commercial use. [8] If Flanagan had been really smart, he would have uploaded the video to Commons and made it public domain. Also, he could have posted his suicide manifesto online instead of sending it as a fax. As a result, it is not possible to read the full 23-page document, only the extracts that the media has decided to publish.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 08:45, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Hey InedibleHulk. Regarding WP:RDM#Name of fetish?, I thought that SemanticMantis's response was great, as by answering it most quickly dismisses what seems likely a trolling question. I'd like to remove the follow-up (baseball-bug-itis) just an edit summary of " Wikipedia:No personal attacks", and would like permission to remove your reply to that comment at the same time. Cheers. -- ToE 12:58, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Nevermind. BB removed the entire thing. -- ToE 13:04, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, appropos of your recent response but not relevant to the thread- I thought you might like this quote from Tom Lehrer:
“ | Lehrer's song "The Old Dope Peddler" is sampled in rapper 2 Chainz's song "Dope Peddler", on his 2012 debut album, Based on a T.R.U. Story. The following year, Lehrer said he was "very proud" to have his song sampled "literally sixty years after I recorded it." Lehrer went on to describe his official response to the request to use his song: "As sole copyright owner of 'The Old Dope Peddler', I grant you motherfuckers permission to do this. Please give my regards to Mr. Chainz, or may I call him 2?" | ” |
SemanticMantis ( talk) 14:37, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phoenix Jones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strikeforce. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:29, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
I need help saving Little Miss Nobody from deletion. Urgently. LMN is Arizona's Boy in the Box. Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 00:22, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
No, this is a banned user and known troll. He's not looking to be educated. He's been around a while, we get rid of his stuff every day or two. Let it drop. -- Jayron 32 01:49, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi InedibleHulk, it should be noted that Bill McDermott continued working even after his accident. Would it be possible to clarify this in the article?
Despite the accident, Bill continued his work as CEO, attending important meetings and conferences. [1],, [2] [3] Harper70 ( talk) 19:32, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Harper70
Thanks so much for your time and for making the edits, Inedible Hulk!
In the interest of clarity, I think it’s quite important to note that Bill never stopped working, and his commitment to the company, its employees and shareholders remained resolute outside of just attending teleconferences. I know this article is in German, but it notes McDermott managed the company from afar.. [4]
Again, another German article, but the Financial Times Europe piece notes that SAP’s business was not affected.. [5]
The October reference in the original article was in McDermott’s ability to travel again, which is obviously beginning tomorrow. There were no restrictions on his ability to work following his surgery.
Would replacing the final sentence of the Personal Life section with “He continued leading SAP during his recuperation and is cleared to travel again as of October 1” be possible. Happy to discuss further! Thanks again. Harper70 ( talk) 19:29, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Harper70
Thank you!! Your edit definitely provides more clarity. I really appreciate your help! Harper70 ( talk) 22:54, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Harper70
Hi again, now that Bill McDermott has been back at HQ for a few months, would it be possible to delete the reference to the October timeframe? It would be great to update the article for readers. Thank you so much. Harper70 ( talk) 18:06, 18 December 2015 (UTC)Harper70
References
InedibleHulk, repent! ( Your Vandalism on last September 2 ) Your excellent https://www.google.ca/search?q=%22sources+say%22&tbs=qdr:d,sbd:1&tbm=nws dropped off some time between 09:15, 2 October 2015 (UTC) and 09:37, 2 October 2015 (UTC). I expect my computer to keeping on running - more on this, perhaps, later. Regards, Askedonty ( talk) 10:09, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
About Murder of the Grimes sisters... not being an Elvis Presley historian, I've just realised that the statement was probably not made by Elvis himself but rather by his "people" as Presley himself would have been far too busy. Not being certain, I'm wondering what call i should make as to what to do? Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 09:12, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
I am going to sleep, I want to further discuss the incidents you wanted to delete. (comment by Bolter21)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rebellion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boss. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:59, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Well, it turned out to be rather pointless and unsubstantiated now that this reaction has come to light, so I'm reverting the edits done and will wait until a proper consensus is reached. Versus001 ( talk) 06:05, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
I moved Murder of Ramona Moore back. Consider it this way: would you insist on retitling Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum theft under the same logic, that no one has been tried for the crime so therefore we can't say it's a theft without ruining their presumption of innocence? If so, what alternative title would you have in mind—" 1990 unauthorized removal of artwork from the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum", perhaps? (And please don't actually do this)
Also, if someone is tried for murder but winds up pleading to, or getting convicted of, manslaughter instead, what should we do? Retitle the article "Manslaughter of ..."? I'd like to know. Daniel Case ( talk) 06:27, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
"Homicide" is a distinction without a difference ... most people see the term and impute intent, despite the fact that technically it applies to self-defense and accidental killings of one person by another as well as murder.
Simply referring to someone's killing as a murder is not inherently libelous as you seem to think (unless you've gotten some case law somewhere to back you up; please share it if you do). What would be libelous is text in the article stating that a particular person did it before a conviction or confession to that effect (and in the former case we should always say "X was convicted of the crime" if they are still protesting their innocence or have not confessed). Legal niceties notwithstanding, "murder" is the most commonly used term for any killing found by investigative authorities to have occurred as a result of deliberate action by another.
I should add that in my state, New York, first-degree murder requires merely that the state prove intent (as well some other special situations), and second-degree murder also requires intent but covers a lot of other situations, including "the influence of extreme emotional disturbance for which there was a reasonable explanation or excuse, in other words what most people think is codified as manslaughter. Manslaughter is reserved for cases where the accused may have not intended to kill the victim but used force so recklessly against him (or with, as the prosecutors on Law & Order are always wont to try and argue, "depraved indifference"). So "murder" at least in New York where the Ramona Moore case took place, covers quite a bit of potential activity.
Using "murder" in the title of articles about deaths believed to have been deliberately caused fits with our naming conventions: "The title is one that readers are likely to look or search for and that editors would naturally use to link to the article from other articles. Such a title usually conveys what the subject is actually called in English." See, also, WP:RECOGNIZABLE, on the same page: "Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's 'official' name as an article title; it generally prefers to use the name that is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable sources." So, when the media starts using "homicide" more frequently, then we can and will. But not until. We reflect the world, we don't take it upon ourselves to change it to any greater extent than trying to put the sum of human knowledge at everyone's fingertips would.
I will grant some exceptions (exceptions that prove the rule) to "murder of ..." as a title:
Daniel Case ( talk) 15:46, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
http://www.exploreforensics.co.uk/blunt-force-trauma.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1882786
"Beaten" is NOT a scientific term...its just not....ever. Sunnydoo ( talk) 11:11, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Re this, I'll give you credit for knowing that it's not worth much. But I wonder whether you considered that many editors are better at counting than weighing, including, I believe, some in that discussion. Why complicate matters unnecessarily? ― Mandruss ☎ 21:16, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
I reverted that. "To protest" was originally synonymous in every context with "to proclaim" (scroll down here), and perhaps since legal usages change so slowly, if it all, "protesting one's innocence" is the only context in which it retains that meaning. See No. 2 under our definition of the verb at Wiktionary, as well as other online dictionaries, plus other such usages). Daniel Case ( talk) 15:30, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
I decided to take "disappearance" out; as her body has been recovered and neither Bonie nor anyone else has been charged with kidnapping or abducting her (yet), so there's no point in repeating a journalist's attempt to be melodramatic in their copy (I know, I was there once) when we can get the same point across with better use of the language. Daniel Case ( talk) 15:40, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
I took a second look at that thing (the ADD comes and goes) and learned that (1) it wasn't a criticism of you as I first thought, and (2) they stole some of my comments (I'm considering suing them for COPYVIO ;). (Guess I can't if they attributed them, on second thought.) Gossip-loving parasites. ― Mandruss ☎ 00:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Look, I now realize that I should have said, "Should I start an RfC on this?". I said it wrong, I apologize, but that fact doesn't outweigh status quo ante. Yeah, it's getting funkier, I agree. ― Mandruss ☎ 00:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Urraca Mesa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black bear. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:54, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I have reverted the edits you made last month to the Ronald Goldman article, as they clearly violate Wikipedia policy, along with common sense. Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman were indeed murdered, as a question of documented fact. The fact that O.J. Simpson was found liable in a wrongful death suit does not mean that there were "no murders", as you stated in your edit summary, since "wrongful death" is a legal term used in civil trials, and is not mutually exclusive from murder. Lastly, we do use terms like "alleged", as explained at WP:ALLEGED. Having amassed over 34,000 edits here since 2006, you should know these things by now. Nightscream ( talk) 13:04, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Central discussion has started; I invite you to improve consensus. -- George Ho ( talk) 23:02, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Hilarious Username |
Your username is quite amusing. Thanks for the chuckle! GrammarFascist contribs talk 17:45, 28 October 2015 (UTC) |
I changed my indentation and adjusted yours as well. Letting you know in case you want to unindent your comment. μηδείς ( talk) 21:19, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
I love your edit summaries and sometimes random comments and whatnot. Super funny. lol Cra sh Underride 05:07, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic UFC 193. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! This is George Ho actually ( Talk) 20:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Please read this notification carefully:
A
community decision has authorised the use of
general sanctions for pages related to the
Syrian Civil War and the
Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described
here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a
one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described
here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The image of the perpetrator is nominated as FFD. I invite you for commentary. -- George Ho ( talk) 19:34, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. In the interest of avoiding an edit war in Holly Holm, especially over something as silly as this, I want to politely point out that no one needs to find "one example of usage" in order to "have a leg to stand on." I only need to cite Wikipedia policy, which I've done.
But since you asked, check out the last sentence in the first paragraph of "Bantamweight championship" -- right above one of the hyphens that you've been removing.
". . .ending Rousey's undefeated streak and three-year reign as champion."
In that case, "three-year" is being used as an adjective for "reign," just like "combat-sports" is being used as an adjective for "history" below. This is a proper use of a hyphen, and there is no reason to keep removing it. If "Combat Sports" was captalized, then there would be no need for the hyphen, but it isn't, and shouldn't be. Of course, I'm not perfect. If you know of a Wikipedia policy that contradicts this, please cite it, and I'll respect that. I hope this resolves things. -- James26 ( talk) 02:16, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
[9] I didn't delete it because it was trolling, I deleted it because it was a stupid thing to say. -- Viennese Waltz 09:19, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Undid revision 692662431 by Diblidabliduu (talk) One man's "often" is another's "sometimes". "Has been" is clear enough.
Okay.
But does that mean there should be no "often" words visible on any politically volatile article, because it's not "unbiased" to have that? ( link) -- Diblidabliduu ( talk) 22:50, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy New Year! | |
Best wishes for a wonderful 2016!----
WV ●
✉
✓
00:08, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Goodness, this page needs archiving...lol -- Mr. Zoot Cig Bunner ( talk) 21:29, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
James JohnsonThis was my original point removing Portland. There is reasonable differentiation between his tenures with Cleveland (where he was a 2-time all-star) and Seattle (where he had his longest tenure and on a title) to just include those two. He had nearly identical tenures with Portland and Houston so it is silly to A) add one just to make it three entries, or B) list 3 of 4 total teams with an arbitrary cutoff. I get what you are saying about limits - so just leave it at Cleveland and Seattle and be done with it. Rikster2 ( talk) 17:28, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
A kitten for you!Here's a fierce jungle kitty for you and your wonderful sense of humor.
Crash
Under
ride
21:47, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Bloody FreakHey man, how are you? Take a look at this guy's contributions. He simply ignores sources based on that blind belief "per Sherdog". One that even elevates Sherdog to a x-ray doctor robot. Not only that, but he believes Sherdog can state a fight ended due to a "esophagus injury" and no source can remove that, even the ones that clearly can and are listed there. Funny thing is that he says this to a user on today's event page: The jaw did break but the submission was just a neck crank. You wouldn't say "Submission (broken arm due to armbar)". So you can't say that, but you can use Sherdog diagnosis on Oliveira's fight? Incredible how he can contradict himself like that though. What's your take on this? It seems clear he needs more people to show him that through a consensus. Gsfelipe94 ( talk) 06:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
ship versus boatThe Cutty Sark is a ship, not a boat - as per your edit summary. The difference, with exceptions, is size. A boat is a watercraft that can be lifted out of the water (often with some sort of mechanical equipment). Sorry to be picky.... And, incidentally, suffer has a number of related meanings - it does not just mean "experience pain/some other bad feeling". An online dictionary has a good example: "The business suffers from lack of capital." ThoughtIdRetired ( talk) 18:31, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
|