Welcome!
Hello, Iamnotcreative, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the
guide for citing sources or come to the
new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{
helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sitush ( talk) 10:19, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing. Have you made any edits that weren't copied from elsewhere? Will you help us by removing all that you copied?
Dougweller (
talk)
12:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Your addition to
Kaukura has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
Sitush (
talk)
13:18, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
I have just spent some considerable time removing numerous of your contributions. I know that at least one other person has also removed a few today, and that various individuals have removed the odd one here and there in the interval between my welcome message above and today. As far as I can determine, just one of your contributions made over the last few weeks has survived, and that was a wikilink. All of the remainder have been removed as either being definite copyright violations or probable unattributed copy/pastes and completely unsourced.
This is not good enough, even though I am aware that you are a new-ish contributor. Please can you take a read of the blue links noted in the various messages above, and please be aware that if I have to spend yet another hour cleaning up the problems in, say, a week's time then it is possible that you will be
blocked from contributing until you demonstrate a commitment to change your ways. It is very time-consuming to sort out disruptive edits on this scale: most of us have better things that we could be doing. -
Sitush (
talk) 14:57, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of
your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
KATANAGOD (
talk) 11:16, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
KATANAGOD (
talk)
11:19, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Dougweller (
talk)
13:26, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Following your email I've unblocked you. I strongly suggest you carefully read and follow Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Dougweller ( talk) 13:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. –
GorillaWarfare
(talk)
18:32, 26 June 2012 (UTC)The article 4sync has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here
04:28, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Iamnotcreative, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the
guide for citing sources or come to the
new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{
helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sitush ( talk) 10:19, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing. Have you made any edits that weren't copied from elsewhere? Will you help us by removing all that you copied?
Dougweller (
talk)
12:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Your addition to
Kaukura has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
Sitush (
talk)
13:18, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
I have just spent some considerable time removing numerous of your contributions. I know that at least one other person has also removed a few today, and that various individuals have removed the odd one here and there in the interval between my welcome message above and today. As far as I can determine, just one of your contributions made over the last few weeks has survived, and that was a wikilink. All of the remainder have been removed as either being definite copyright violations or probable unattributed copy/pastes and completely unsourced.
This is not good enough, even though I am aware that you are a new-ish contributor. Please can you take a read of the blue links noted in the various messages above, and please be aware that if I have to spend yet another hour cleaning up the problems in, say, a week's time then it is possible that you will be
blocked from contributing until you demonstrate a commitment to change your ways. It is very time-consuming to sort out disruptive edits on this scale: most of us have better things that we could be doing. -
Sitush (
talk) 14:57, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of
your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
KATANAGOD (
talk) 11:16, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
KATANAGOD (
talk)
11:19, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Dougweller (
talk)
13:26, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Following your email I've unblocked you. I strongly suggest you carefully read and follow Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Dougweller ( talk) 13:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. –
GorillaWarfare
(talk)
18:32, 26 June 2012 (UTC)The article 4sync has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here
04:28, 27 August 2015 (UTC)