![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Legacypac ( talk) 04:28, 26 June 2018 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin ( talk) 18:06, 29 June 2018 (UTC)Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Horse-eye jack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Snook ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:14, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
AmericanAir88 ( talk) 02:04, 15 July 2018 (UTC)If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Jon Landry (politician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 16:19, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
The article Jon Landry (politician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable politician, per WP:POLITICIAN. Formerly one of seven council members for a city with a population of 25,000. Main claim of significance is an alleged sex scandal.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
12:30, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
L293D ( ☎ • ✎) 15:52, 24 July 2018 (UTC)Hello, Horse Eye Jack. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's Connecticut-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining
WikiProject Connecticut? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's Connecticut-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the
list of participants. Please see our
list of open tasks for ideas on where to get started.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! ― Matthew J. Long -Talk- ☖ 21:07, 3 February 2019 (UTC) |
I will note that pl wiki has a separate entry on it: pl:TK-3 Eventually we should too. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:28, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Horse Eye Jack,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Lisa Wilson-Foley should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Wilson-Foley .
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Meatsgains( talk) 02:01, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
@ Meatsgains: Im curious as to how you consider the notability requirements not to be met, don’t the dozen plus articles (including multiple full stories in the NYT) and a book not go well above and beyond general notability WP:BIO requirements? Horse Eye Jack ( talk) 15:17, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar | |
For level headed impartiality and good Wikipedia work! Lubbad85 ( ☎) 00:18, 29 April 2019 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
For your proper Wikipedian efforts Lubbad85 ( ☎) 17:12, 30 April 2019 (UTC) |
Seems we both have had similar issues with this IP. Just dropping this note in case you were curious. – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 02:16, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
== [[User:2602:252:d91:e650:1006:1361:4bc3:27f2]] reported by [[User:Horse Eye Jack]] (Result: ) == '''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Eddie Perez (politician)}} <br /> '''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|2602:252:d91:e650:1006:1361:4bc3:27f2}} Previous version reverted to: [https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Eddie_Perez_(politician)&diff=895709959&oldid=895709665] Diffs of the user's reverts: [https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Eddie_Perez_(politician)&diff=895719843&oldid=895718379] [https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Eddie_Perez_(politician)&diff=895716945&oldid=895713251] [https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Eddie_Perez_(politician)&diff=895713019&oldid=895712320] Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Eddie_Perez_(politician)&diff=895722747&oldid=755772555] Comments: New user, has only edited the page of a political candidate and his opponent. I’ve never filled one of these out before, apologies in advance for any errors. ~~~~
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Icewhiz ( talk) 15:26, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Icewhiz ( talk) 15:26, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greg Abbott, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Hayden ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:07, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for writing Connecticut Juvenile Training School! I appreciate that very much!
A few things:
Happy editing! WhisperToMe ( talk) 00:36, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello Horse Eye Jack,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged George A. Tomasso for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 08:17, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Horse Eye Jack,
Thanks for creating George A. Tomasso! I edit here too, under the username Chris troutman and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
I'm not sure WP:GNG reaches that far, but others may disagree, which is why I'm not nominating this for deletion. I think better sourcing is needed.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chris troutman}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Chris Troutman ( talk) 17:55, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Horse Eye Jack,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Copper Hill Golf Club, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to prevent the deletion:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Publish Changes
button.But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969 TT me 02:02, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Horse Eye Jack,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Shari Cantor, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to prevent the deletion:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Publish Changes
button.But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969 TT me 02:09, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Shari Cantor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 TT me 02:10, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shari Cantor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shari Cantor (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 12:16, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Hey Horse Eye Jack! As a high output editor, I'd love to see you at this even in New Haven. It's this August 10th. Would you be able to attend?
Details can be found here: [1]
Cheers, – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 02:27, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Criticism of Huawei, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wired ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 11:54, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saudi Arabia–Taiwan relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ROCAF ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:42, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I think the situation with the IP editor 140.96.152.23 could have been handled a bit better. The edit summary here and the extra text in the {{ uw-paid1}} message [2] was WP:BITE-y. Notifying undisclosed paid editors is crucial, but let's educate them and avoid public shaming. If they knowingly and repeatedly flout the rules, then we can wikt:lower the boom. -- Drm310 🍁 ( talk) 15:08, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Menachem Mendel Schneerson shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jayjg (talk) 20:27, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Daveburstein ( talk) 23:05, 30 July 2019 (UTC) Fair comment so I looked again. Per comments, reviewed my changes and accepted reversions in many cases. I left things clearly historically accurate even if old. But most of what I took out was not just old but non-neutral i.e. the Nortel section, on which I reported heavily at the time. The claim of "crucial government support" is disputed and not neutral, as the question of whether Huawei is government-supported is part of the attack and unbalanced. I did pull old non-neutral and possibly inaccurate claims, such as Nortel destruction and crucial government support. Because "white label" is much less important today, I replaced "provides" with "has provided." The article is now slightly more neutral and contains numerous criticisms of Huawei. If you choose to reinsert them, I will not revert because we both have better things to do.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adam Everett Livix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IDF ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:15, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
is not banned. Please stop striking through their comments or reverting their edits on that basis. WP:BANREVERT applies to banned accounts, not blocked ones. nableezy - 16:14, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
I *choose* to revert any edit by the sock of a banned user I find. Horse Eye Jack ( talk) 16:20, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced or
poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at
List of LGBT Jews. Content of this nature could be regarded as
defamatory and is in violation of
Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Jayjg
(talk)
17:30, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Regarding this edit, it's actually not good enough to merely Google the individual's name and "Jewish"; turns out you have to actually read the source too, to make sure it supports the claim. This source, for example, stated that Hoylman "had not formally converted to Judaism". So that would mean not Jewish. Maybe wait until he converts? Jayjg (talk) 18:04, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Horse Eye Jack,
Thanks for creating Mari Stull! I edit here too, under the username Chris troutman and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
It's not clear subject passes WP:GNG; please see WP:LOWPROFILE and WP:BLP1E
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chris troutman}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Chris Troutman ( talk) 17:35, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Read this Harassment#Wikihounding, carefully, and reflect on this series of edits and how they will look when reported on an administrative board: [9], [10], [11], [12]. Here come the Suns ( talk) 14:29, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Could you explain how you found yourself at [[Talk:NumbersUSA}], a page you have never edited before, commenting on a discussion I am having and disagreeing with my position? Here come the Suns ( talk) 14:50, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
What a pita! You're reverting stuff that hasn't even been tagged, is referenced on the same page and elsewhere, & is very well known. Some of us like to add stuff here, but we seem to be outnumbered by those who just like to remove. Johnbod ( talk) 03:21, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Mar-A-Lago Crowd, does not have enough sources and citations as written to show that this is a distinctive and standard term used to describe the group being discussed, I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
DGG (
talk )
09:21, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Horse Eye Jack,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Copper Hill Golf Club, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to prevent the deletion:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Publish Changes
button.But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969 TT me 01:25, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
– MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 11:35, 31 August 2019 (UTC)A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Copper Hill Golf Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Copper Hill Golf Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 12:20, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
If you want to work on it, do it at Draft:Ammar Campa-Najjar, the deleted revision of the article from last year, which meets wiki policies in a way that what you are edit warring over doesn't. Nothing has changed since the AfD last year. – Muboshgu ( talk) 20:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello Horse Eye Jack! I was removing what I believe is unencyclopedic content from a BLP article because who they are fans of is typically not relevant, even if it is sourced. Is there a particular reason you believe otherwise? Thanks! S0091 ( talk) 00:43, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello. I am unsure of why you have an issue with my verified facts on the page of Mari Stull & I am confused as to why you are reporting my edits as vandalism when they are clearly not. Also, what is your interest in Mari Stull? You seem to be very active on editing her page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by USAfactchecker ( talk • contribs) 03:39, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Debresser ( talk) 23:03, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
changes of “Taiwan” to “Republic of China” and “China” to “Mainland China” I would remind you that the consensus is that we call these east asian nations Taiwan and China.WP:AT applies only to article titles, and not article text. The trope
These edits appear to make up a significant portion of your total edits and have for yearsis an irrelevant attempt to poison the well, let alone numerically inaccurate. CaradhrasAiguo ( leave language) 03:58, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
joining into discussions on random user talk pages is generally frowned uponNope, completely made up, and the "slow edit war", that you mentioned TaerkastUA was warned over, has nothing to do with Greater China and is yet another ad hominem (not to mention the absurd, evidence-free contention that I somehow "selectively edit" my user talk) irrelevant to the inherent 'discussion' on naming. CaradhrasAiguo ( leave language) 13:40, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Horse_Eye_Jack reported by User:CaradhrasAiguo (Result: ). Thank you. CaradhrasAiguo (
leave language)
13:21, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia clearly and unequivocally provided a notification at the top citing that that page clearly looks like it was a campaign page and promotional. It is need I’m Revision. YOU DIDNT REVISE ANYTHING. You simply put back everything that Wikipedia said they didn’t want. Zzannoni1956 ( talk) 03:41, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for defending me at Talk:KAI T-50 Golden Eagle. I finally figured out that volunteers don't get paid enough to endure abuse like that for years on end. I was actually considering unretiring, but now I remember why I retired in the first place. Thanks for stepping in. - BilCat ( talk) 23:19, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Horse Eye Jack!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Bearcat (
talk)
20:25, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
|
You will do well to stop harassing me, especially as not in a situation where you ultimately embarass yourself by being on the wrong side of policy. CaradhrasAiguo ( leave language) 16:29, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pyras Technology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pyras Technology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Abishe ( talk) 11:12, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
I’m new to Wikipedia. What is OR? Many thanks Alainlambert ( talk) 01:51, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make
personal attacks on other people, as you did at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.
Bbb23 (
talk)
02:26, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Your repeated tagging of Li Xianyu is getting disruptive. As a major general, she satisfies WP:MILPEOPLE #2; as a researcher, she satisfies WP:NACADEMIC #3. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies and guidelines before adding more tags. I see that you've been warned recently for harassment and edit warring. If you insist on adding more unwarranted tags you'll leave me with no choice but reporting you for disruptive editing. - Zanhe ( talk) 21:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Template:Did you know nominations/Liao I-chiu at the
Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in
step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{
db-g7}}, or ask a
DYK admin. Thank you.
DYKHousekeepingBot (
talk)
13:28, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Xinjiang re-education camps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:11, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maritime industries of Taiwan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taswell ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:44, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
How is my contribution to the discussion disrupting? It may be different from your opinions or point of view, but true. In fact some of it is in reply to others such as yourself. If you disagree, then you can point it out in the discussion and talk instead of deleting my contributions and stifle discussion. How can you improve the article if you wipe out a balanced discussion. You must stop your bias. 81.158.205.115 ( talk) 12:08, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
You know where that lies. And, with an order of edits more than you, in highly controversial domains, you can be certain that I know where I am stepping into. ∯WBG converse 18:18, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Legacypac ( talk) 04:28, 26 June 2018 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin ( talk) 18:06, 29 June 2018 (UTC)Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Horse-eye jack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Snook ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:14, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
AmericanAir88 ( talk) 02:04, 15 July 2018 (UTC)If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Jon Landry (politician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 16:19, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
The article Jon Landry (politician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable politician, per WP:POLITICIAN. Formerly one of seven council members for a city with a population of 25,000. Main claim of significance is an alleged sex scandal.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
12:30, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
L293D ( ☎ • ✎) 15:52, 24 July 2018 (UTC)Hello, Horse Eye Jack. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's Connecticut-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining
WikiProject Connecticut? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's Connecticut-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the
list of participants. Please see our
list of open tasks for ideas on where to get started.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! ― Matthew J. Long -Talk- ☖ 21:07, 3 February 2019 (UTC) |
I will note that pl wiki has a separate entry on it: pl:TK-3 Eventually we should too. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:28, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Horse Eye Jack,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Lisa Wilson-Foley should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Wilson-Foley .
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Meatsgains( talk) 02:01, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
@ Meatsgains: Im curious as to how you consider the notability requirements not to be met, don’t the dozen plus articles (including multiple full stories in the NYT) and a book not go well above and beyond general notability WP:BIO requirements? Horse Eye Jack ( talk) 15:17, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar | |
For level headed impartiality and good Wikipedia work! Lubbad85 ( ☎) 00:18, 29 April 2019 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
For your proper Wikipedian efforts Lubbad85 ( ☎) 17:12, 30 April 2019 (UTC) |
Seems we both have had similar issues with this IP. Just dropping this note in case you were curious. – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 02:16, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
== [[User:2602:252:d91:e650:1006:1361:4bc3:27f2]] reported by [[User:Horse Eye Jack]] (Result: ) == '''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Eddie Perez (politician)}} <br /> '''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|2602:252:d91:e650:1006:1361:4bc3:27f2}} Previous version reverted to: [https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Eddie_Perez_(politician)&diff=895709959&oldid=895709665] Diffs of the user's reverts: [https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Eddie_Perez_(politician)&diff=895719843&oldid=895718379] [https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Eddie_Perez_(politician)&diff=895716945&oldid=895713251] [https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Eddie_Perez_(politician)&diff=895713019&oldid=895712320] Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Eddie_Perez_(politician)&diff=895722747&oldid=755772555] Comments: New user, has only edited the page of a political candidate and his opponent. I’ve never filled one of these out before, apologies in advance for any errors. ~~~~
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Icewhiz ( talk) 15:26, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Icewhiz ( talk) 15:26, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greg Abbott, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Hayden ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:07, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for writing Connecticut Juvenile Training School! I appreciate that very much!
A few things:
Happy editing! WhisperToMe ( talk) 00:36, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello Horse Eye Jack,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged George A. Tomasso for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 08:17, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Horse Eye Jack,
Thanks for creating George A. Tomasso! I edit here too, under the username Chris troutman and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
I'm not sure WP:GNG reaches that far, but others may disagree, which is why I'm not nominating this for deletion. I think better sourcing is needed.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chris troutman}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Chris Troutman ( talk) 17:55, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Horse Eye Jack,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Copper Hill Golf Club, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to prevent the deletion:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Publish Changes
button.But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969 TT me 02:02, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Horse Eye Jack,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Shari Cantor, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to prevent the deletion:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Publish Changes
button.But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969 TT me 02:09, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Shari Cantor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 TT me 02:10, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shari Cantor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shari Cantor (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 12:16, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Hey Horse Eye Jack! As a high output editor, I'd love to see you at this even in New Haven. It's this August 10th. Would you be able to attend?
Details can be found here: [1]
Cheers, – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 02:27, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Criticism of Huawei, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wired ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 11:54, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saudi Arabia–Taiwan relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ROCAF ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:42, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I think the situation with the IP editor 140.96.152.23 could have been handled a bit better. The edit summary here and the extra text in the {{ uw-paid1}} message [2] was WP:BITE-y. Notifying undisclosed paid editors is crucial, but let's educate them and avoid public shaming. If they knowingly and repeatedly flout the rules, then we can wikt:lower the boom. -- Drm310 🍁 ( talk) 15:08, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Menachem Mendel Schneerson shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jayjg (talk) 20:27, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Daveburstein ( talk) 23:05, 30 July 2019 (UTC) Fair comment so I looked again. Per comments, reviewed my changes and accepted reversions in many cases. I left things clearly historically accurate even if old. But most of what I took out was not just old but non-neutral i.e. the Nortel section, on which I reported heavily at the time. The claim of "crucial government support" is disputed and not neutral, as the question of whether Huawei is government-supported is part of the attack and unbalanced. I did pull old non-neutral and possibly inaccurate claims, such as Nortel destruction and crucial government support. Because "white label" is much less important today, I replaced "provides" with "has provided." The article is now slightly more neutral and contains numerous criticisms of Huawei. If you choose to reinsert them, I will not revert because we both have better things to do.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adam Everett Livix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IDF ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:15, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
is not banned. Please stop striking through their comments or reverting their edits on that basis. WP:BANREVERT applies to banned accounts, not blocked ones. nableezy - 16:14, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
I *choose* to revert any edit by the sock of a banned user I find. Horse Eye Jack ( talk) 16:20, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced or
poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at
List of LGBT Jews. Content of this nature could be regarded as
defamatory and is in violation of
Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Jayjg
(talk)
17:30, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Regarding this edit, it's actually not good enough to merely Google the individual's name and "Jewish"; turns out you have to actually read the source too, to make sure it supports the claim. This source, for example, stated that Hoylman "had not formally converted to Judaism". So that would mean not Jewish. Maybe wait until he converts? Jayjg (talk) 18:04, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Horse Eye Jack,
Thanks for creating Mari Stull! I edit here too, under the username Chris troutman and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
It's not clear subject passes WP:GNG; please see WP:LOWPROFILE and WP:BLP1E
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chris troutman}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Chris Troutman ( talk) 17:35, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Read this Harassment#Wikihounding, carefully, and reflect on this series of edits and how they will look when reported on an administrative board: [9], [10], [11], [12]. Here come the Suns ( talk) 14:29, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Could you explain how you found yourself at [[Talk:NumbersUSA}], a page you have never edited before, commenting on a discussion I am having and disagreeing with my position? Here come the Suns ( talk) 14:50, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
What a pita! You're reverting stuff that hasn't even been tagged, is referenced on the same page and elsewhere, & is very well known. Some of us like to add stuff here, but we seem to be outnumbered by those who just like to remove. Johnbod ( talk) 03:21, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Mar-A-Lago Crowd, does not have enough sources and citations as written to show that this is a distinctive and standard term used to describe the group being discussed, I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
DGG (
talk )
09:21, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Horse Eye Jack,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Copper Hill Golf Club, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to prevent the deletion:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Publish Changes
button.But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969 TT me 01:25, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
– MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 11:35, 31 August 2019 (UTC)A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Copper Hill Golf Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Copper Hill Golf Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 12:20, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
If you want to work on it, do it at Draft:Ammar Campa-Najjar, the deleted revision of the article from last year, which meets wiki policies in a way that what you are edit warring over doesn't. Nothing has changed since the AfD last year. – Muboshgu ( talk) 20:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello Horse Eye Jack! I was removing what I believe is unencyclopedic content from a BLP article because who they are fans of is typically not relevant, even if it is sourced. Is there a particular reason you believe otherwise? Thanks! S0091 ( talk) 00:43, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello. I am unsure of why you have an issue with my verified facts on the page of Mari Stull & I am confused as to why you are reporting my edits as vandalism when they are clearly not. Also, what is your interest in Mari Stull? You seem to be very active on editing her page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by USAfactchecker ( talk • contribs) 03:39, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Debresser ( talk) 23:03, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
changes of “Taiwan” to “Republic of China” and “China” to “Mainland China” I would remind you that the consensus is that we call these east asian nations Taiwan and China.WP:AT applies only to article titles, and not article text. The trope
These edits appear to make up a significant portion of your total edits and have for yearsis an irrelevant attempt to poison the well, let alone numerically inaccurate. CaradhrasAiguo ( leave language) 03:58, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
joining into discussions on random user talk pages is generally frowned uponNope, completely made up, and the "slow edit war", that you mentioned TaerkastUA was warned over, has nothing to do with Greater China and is yet another ad hominem (not to mention the absurd, evidence-free contention that I somehow "selectively edit" my user talk) irrelevant to the inherent 'discussion' on naming. CaradhrasAiguo ( leave language) 13:40, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Horse_Eye_Jack reported by User:CaradhrasAiguo (Result: ). Thank you. CaradhrasAiguo (
leave language)
13:21, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia clearly and unequivocally provided a notification at the top citing that that page clearly looks like it was a campaign page and promotional. It is need I’m Revision. YOU DIDNT REVISE ANYTHING. You simply put back everything that Wikipedia said they didn’t want. Zzannoni1956 ( talk) 03:41, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for defending me at Talk:KAI T-50 Golden Eagle. I finally figured out that volunteers don't get paid enough to endure abuse like that for years on end. I was actually considering unretiring, but now I remember why I retired in the first place. Thanks for stepping in. - BilCat ( talk) 23:19, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Horse Eye Jack!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Bearcat (
talk)
20:25, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
|
You will do well to stop harassing me, especially as not in a situation where you ultimately embarass yourself by being on the wrong side of policy. CaradhrasAiguo ( leave language) 16:29, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pyras Technology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pyras Technology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Abishe ( talk) 11:12, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
I’m new to Wikipedia. What is OR? Many thanks Alainlambert ( talk) 01:51, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make
personal attacks on other people, as you did at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.
Bbb23 (
talk)
02:26, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Your repeated tagging of Li Xianyu is getting disruptive. As a major general, she satisfies WP:MILPEOPLE #2; as a researcher, she satisfies WP:NACADEMIC #3. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies and guidelines before adding more tags. I see that you've been warned recently for harassment and edit warring. If you insist on adding more unwarranted tags you'll leave me with no choice but reporting you for disruptive editing. - Zanhe ( talk) 21:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Template:Did you know nominations/Liao I-chiu at the
Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in
step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{
db-g7}}, or ask a
DYK admin. Thank you.
DYKHousekeepingBot (
talk)
13:28, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Xinjiang re-education camps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:11, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maritime industries of Taiwan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taswell ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:44, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
How is my contribution to the discussion disrupting? It may be different from your opinions or point of view, but true. In fact some of it is in reply to others such as yourself. If you disagree, then you can point it out in the discussion and talk instead of deleting my contributions and stifle discussion. How can you improve the article if you wipe out a balanced discussion. You must stop your bias. 81.158.205.115 ( talk) 12:08, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
You know where that lies. And, with an order of edits more than you, in highly controversial domains, you can be certain that I know where I am stepping into. ∯WBG converse 18:18, 21 December 2019 (UTC)