![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 125 | ← | Archive 127 | Archive 128 | Archive 129 | Archive 130 | Archive 131 | → | Archive 135 |
I saw you are one of the admins at Autopatrolled and I came across Pvmoutside who is a prolific stub creator, since over 10 years. At the beginning of his wikipedia career he also created some start class articles. Pvmoutside doesn't answer at the talk page, keeps creating basic stubs and was given the autopatrolled rights over 10 years ago by an editor who no longer is editing. I have seen other autopatrolled editors created mainly start class or better assessed articles before being granted autopatrolled. I wouldn't grant Pvmoutside autopatrolled and I wonder what your conclusion is. Paradise Chronicle ( talk) 11:07, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
"Ass In High Gear Award"
|
Your work as an admin is not being graded, |
Hi, recently you indefinitely blocked SapientiaLinguistica for their behavior (which was related to their activity on the article Chakavian). Yesterday was registered a new account Brack3tRedacted whose first edit was on the same article making same disruptive changes to the content. Maybe it is too soon to report them for sock investigation without further evidence (besides CheckUser). As they are not making any edits elsewhere it is enough to semi-protect the article. A long semi-protection would be good anyway. Miki Filigranski ( talk) 16:41, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Could you modify the block for 2a01:c23::/32 to include talk page access as well? see Special:Diff/1142619311 AP 499D25 ( talk) 12:54, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
In January, you blocked this IP because of the constant vandalism. Since the block expired, there have been 6 edits made from that IP, all vandalism. Wes sideman ( talk) 14:39, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello!
I really want to thank you so much for all the work that you do on Wikipedia, and for taking the time to reply to my permission request with some very helpful information and advice:)
I really want to chat about Wikipedia if that's okay? I have been very interested in being very heavily involved in Wikipedia, I would love to help a lot of people here.
I love editing on Wikipedia, it gives me something very positive to do and I really love it! I was wondering if I could ask for some advice? I really want to be extremely helpful and to see positive change done by myself. I would love to help articles become so much better and to see positive changes just like I can see on your Userpage!
Would you be able to help me? I'd love to one day have things like "50 articles heavily improved by my work" and things like that. Something to look at on my profile page and think look at this positive change I've done!
Also, what I have done so far...would you say there's some good in that?
Thanks so much I appreciate everything! MrBauer24 ( talk) 21:50, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
I presume that you did read this thread where multiple users noted GCB's baiting behaviour — including with inappropriate sexual innuendos — for a long span of time across multiple t/p(s) including threads w/o me? Also, Doug is a long time talk-page stalker with whom I have colloborated on S. Asian articles and I can assure you that he was not "warning" me. That said, you can always verify from the horse's mouth. TrangaBellam ( talk) 20:40, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I have already exceeded my limit in this discussion. However, can I give a one-two sentences answer to other participants of the discussion? Marcelus ( talk) 21:44, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Did you see my thread on VM's t/p; it was a misunderstanding on his part. Though I should have provided a diff. TrangaBellam ( talk) 16:43, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Thank you today for Operation Flavius, introduced (in 2014): "In 1988, at the height of "the Troubles" in Northern Ireland, an IRA team attempted to detonate a car bomb in Gibraltar. They were pursued by British special special forces, who shot dead three IRA members who later turned out be unarmed and not in possession of a bomb. The resulting chain reaction left another half a dozen people dead in Belfast, while a dispute over the legality of the SAS' actions raged for another seven years until a ruling from the European Court of Human Rights which left neither side entirely satisfied. This article documents that chain of events, with all its twists and turns. It's certainly been interesting, given that the subject matter is still controversial today ..."! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:22, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Joining the party on your talk page:
Although I am uninvolved in the pages in question, I posted about GCB at another page that Grabowski took issue with, Collaboration with the Axis Powers. (I was already working on the France section when I became aware of his article.) GCB was rather obstructive with respect to my attempts to verify some of his specific comments about that page, but I do not know if she realized that that is what they were. If my remarks at AE aren't helpful I'll withdraw them and file a separate ANI, but I've been working up to reporting Trangabellam, for exactly what Marcelus complains of, at a page unrelated to the Holocaust.
I have had issues with Marcelus in the past but I believe that he was similarly trying to improve deficiencies identified by Grabowski. I can probably find the link where he said that, if it would be helpful. I just read the history of the massacre article and I am not sure I agree with him, but he was trying to source it, I think.
I personally believe Trangabellam is the wrongest, but before I bring in completely unrelated subject matter I thought I should ask. The short version is that immediately after an attempt to AfD an article failed, they rewrote it to say that its topic was invalid, completely ignoring my repeated protests and attempts to discuss at the talk page. But this has nothing to do with Poland or the Holocaust.
I don't trust myself to discuss Gitz. He is, yes, polite. Anything else I would have to say about him would require diffs and I am trying to keep the scope of my comments narrow. Please ping me if you would like to see the link re Marcelus or diffs re Trangabellam at the board. Elinruby ( talk) 07:57, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
TrangaBellam rewrote it to say that its topic was invalid, completely ignoring my repeated protests and attempts to discuss at the talk page.has been discussed at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive315#Minaro123. See Elinruby's comments in part. TrangaBellam ( talk) 12:10, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Harry, Marcelus just made a proposal at Talk:Collaboration with the Axis powers (see BRD fail section), and I've invited him to develop it further. Can you please tailor whatever penalty you give him to allow that to continue? Make that page an exception or whatever? I promise not to get into a knife-fight with him, am familiar with his work, and welcome his input. It would be hard to discuss rewrites if he had a 0RR restriction. Thank you for any thought you give this. Elinruby ( talk) 00:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello HJ,
I do a lot of work reverting vandalism to Wikipedia and would like to use the tool AntiVandal. This requires Rollback, which I don’t have. I was looking at the permissions page and it looks like you are the one that reviews most requests. Do you think I am qualified? I have over 1,300 edits. I am very familiar with general Wikipedia policies and the policy on Rollback (only use on Vandalism). My CSD log may also show this. My thanks log may also be helpful. However, I have only been editing for a little over 2 weeks. I have seen editors with less edits than me get approved, but they have also had an account longer. I would also be open to a trial period. I don’t know if this would stop me from getting it, so I am asking your opinion.
If you don’t think I am qualified, tell me why, or how long I need to have been here for. If you think I am qualified, you can go ahead grant me the user right, or I can apply for it on the page.
I appreciate your feedback in advance. - 🔥 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 23:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
In addition, I was recently involved in this issue, that Rollback would be helpful in. - 🔥 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 00:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Don't you mean east of the Adriatic? Elinruby ( talk) 00:21, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
A kitten to get over the recent personal attacks directed towards you. We all are grateful for your contributions. Keep doing what you're doing.
❯❯❯
Raydann
(Talk)
20:30, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
See Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations/HuffSmurf. Not sure if the comments should be kept at all ( WP:DENY, WP:NOTHERE?). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:36, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
I don't know about page protection but the 500/30 restriction and these two ArbCom Amendments apply to that page like any other on Wikipedia [1] [2]. The 500/30 restriction was passed *precisely* to prevent this kind of nonsense. Volunteer Marek 13:52, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
21:29, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi HJ Mitchell, in the open Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 arbitration case, a remedy or finding of fact has been proposed which relates to you.
You are not directly affected by any proposed sanction; this is just for your information.
Your name appears on the page only once because you had partially blocked ZaniGiovanni, and this is mentioned in ZaniGiovanni's "sanction history" section.
Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 21:53, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Making personal attacks, [5] and a brief look over their contributions since returning from the block suggests much the same sort of edit warring and tendentious behavior as well as building an extensive "case" in their sandbox showing that they did not learn the lesson of the block at all. Andre 🚐 00:58, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
We're not going to "de-news" the opening sentence of the article of, um, Fox News. Their journalistic integrity is certainly in tatters as the Dominion lawsuit exposes a lot of nefarious, partisan activities behind the curtain. All of that can and should go into the article, but let's stay grounded in reality in how the lede describes the subject.
"a shot across the bow". I found that wording from the Admin curiously hostile and ironic, considering he admission that the block was for both the "run around processing" and incivility. The idea of being "shot and sunk" for non-compliance is quite a metaphorA shot across the bow means a warning. One you seem to have avoided heeding. You have continued to make unsubstantiated allegations such as
This is hallmark sealioning.As far as the discussion with @ Zaathras, Zaathras and I have a perfectly good and collegial relationship on wiki and probably agree on most things. I somewhat jocularly and sarcastically made a joke at Fox's expense (as indicated by the italics) but was saying that Zaathras was being reasonable. The only person out of line here is you with your continued aspersions and attacks. Andre 🚐 01:02, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello. I tried to notify you from the above user’s ( User talk:Aviram7) talk page that they are proving too hair-trigger in their use of their newly acquired rollback or rights, reverting a thank you I put on my own talk page to a welcome from User:Fragrant Peony as unconstructive. That, simply, is not cricket (even if their edit and my response to it on my talk page have since been erased by them). 2601:196:180:8D80:ADA2:986A:1D5F:F14D ( talk) 07:46, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
At User:IBangedUrDad666 1AmNobody24 ( talk) 19:21, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
I practically just got the e-mail out, went back to look, only to see the article and the AfD revdel'd and the offender indeffed, in a matter of moments. Damn fast work, and thank you! Ravenswing 20:50, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for what you did at
[14]. @
RegentsPark and @
Bishonen were trying to save Trangabellam as usual. (This time they failed.) Thanks for not falling for it and the logged warning. (I am sorry if speaking against admins in this way is a policy violation, but I don't know how to put it in any other way.)
Akshaypatill (
talk)
06:59, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Dear HJ Mitchell, Sorry for this request to but
I have exicted to remove vandalism, so I think i eligible for PCR rights because I aware about that my home Wikipedia is hi. Wikipedia but i like to editing on english Wikipedia i not more edits on here but i only revert vandalism on enwiki, this is a great work for me, If I get a chance to review other users' edits here, rest as you wish.kinds regards →
αѵίɾαʍ7
([ʆεt'ς tαʆƘ🇮🇳])←
15:56, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello sir, my name is TheManishPanwar. I am also interested in vandalism removal. But. [ Changes] will go quickly. So as I get it made, I am not able to remove it. Can you please give rollback rights. Manish Panwar ( talk) | Contribs) 06:37, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
You are reverting away from BRD. user boldly removed the content, I reverted. It is theirs to take to the talk page. We've hashed it out there before including source discussions: Talk:Laurence_Olivier/Archive 4#sfn "no target" error. As far as i can tell, SC simply waited several months to remove the content they didn't like, that was added by several editors. — Shibbolethink ( ♔ ♕) 13:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
As far as i can tell, SC simply waited several months to remove the content they didn't like, that was added by several editors”. Aside from it only being added by one editor ( you), rather than the “several” you claim, I can’t quite parse your comment with “
I don't think it was done in bad faith, and I'm not alleging any misconduct here”, which is exactly what you’re doing, but never mind. It’s also false to try and claim that I removed it because I “
didn't like” it. Please don’t try and assign motives to people when you don’t understand what your saying. - SchroCat ( talk) 16:54, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
you don’t understand what your saying.
Hi HJ I came across your commentary on the Prince Harry page and you seem reasonable. I think the page is out of control and continues to add too much information. I don’t think Wikipedia is supposed to be a replacement for buying a book or reading the news. So much on his page is propaganda from tabloids that he is currently in a lawsuit against for phone hacking and listening device inside home etc… The moderator is convinced that it’s reasonable to add whatever is reported or the tabloids find newsworthy. This has been an ongoing issue with same moderator for years. I mean to include how Harry lost his virginity? Just let people buy the book. Also, talking heads are paid to speak, I don’t want to go the route of adding talking heads that agree with Harry, I just don’t think it should be included at all. DigitialNomad ( talk) 18:43, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I have a problem with one of the users. I don't know if this behavior is normal and acceptable on Wikipedia, but I find it very unpleasant. I don't want to start AE or AI again, but if this behavior breaks any rules, I would ask you to say to this user not to that. I don't want any bans, sanctions, just simple intervention (if it's required).
As you know I have 0RR restrictions imposed on Eastern Europe. Pofka is taking advantage of this, and in every discussion we take part in brings up the sanctions imposed on me. Which is all the more strange because he himself recently had a complete block on editing in topics about Lithuania (and I think also Poland) for personal attacks against me. Recently, this ban was revoked. I would understand if the discussion was about my behavior, then invoking the sanctions would make sense. But these are always purely content-related discussions. In this situation, I feel that the constant bringing up of my sanctions is aimed at discrediting me, changing attitudes towards my arguments, etc.
Examples:
When I asked him to stop doing this, he simply deleted my question from his talk page. What do you think about it? Marcelus ( talk) 19:51, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello HJ Mitchell,
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland/Evidence. Please add your evidence by April 04, 2023, which is when the first evidence phase closes. Submitted evidence will be summarized by Arbitrators and Clerks at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland/Evidence/Summary. Owing to the summary style, editors are encouraged to submit evidence in small chunks sooner rather than more complete evidence later.
Details about the summary page, the two phases of evidence, a timeline and other answers to frequently asked questions can be found at the case's FAQ page.
For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration.
For the Arbitration Committee,
~ ToBeFree (
talk)
00:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I am curious if there is a page that explains what a recent changes patroller is, as I remember you saying something about that. I tried looking at the user access levels page but I can not find it. If you know of one can I see the page that explains it? -- Grapefanatic ( talk) 12:14, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I see you have protected the title “ Coke Studio Tamil” for being recreated several times. Therefore, I can not edit the title. However, I think it maybe redirected to Coke Studio (Indian TV program)#Coke Studio Tamil for reference. Can you create the redirection page? I will be glad if you ping me for any other opinion. Regards — Meghmollar2017 ( U T C) — 18:42, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi HJ Mitchell. Considering the fact that you are the administrator who deleted this article, I thought maybe I needed to bring this draft to your attention because it appears to be endorsing the same individual who has presented himself as a footballer or singer on multiple occasions. Can an administrator delete a draft, or should we just wait out on the incubating period which is usually 6 months if I'm not mistaken? Keivan.f Talk 14:47, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Harry, Is it time to put a "retired" notice on his user page? And hide the last para on being a current WMUK trustee etc? It's over 2 years since he edited, sadly. Perhaps you could ask the great man? Best Johnbod ( talk) 16:55, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi HJ, You blocked me for one week for "disruptive editing", although honestly I did not see anything disruptive in my editing. But, be that as it may, in my opinion the people who cheered for me to get blocked were much worse offenders of Wikipedia rules. Unfortunately, it appears to me that no one really bothered to read what I had to write, what others wrote, and the content I had attempted to edit. You write above that one should not assume bad faith on the part of other editors, but that is exactly what was done in my case. In fact, given the opportunity, I could, not only say but prove the same for some others (did I mention an editor or an admin? No :). Before I act against some who I believe violate Wikipedia rules knowingly and brazenly, and who claimed bad faith on my part while knowing better, I would like to learn your view of exactly why you went ahead and blocked me. Please write. I will not get upset, but I do consider sometimes how some people can get away with what they do, and that does upset me. Thank you. 70.164.212.36 ( talk) 22:32, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
HJ, I opened a thread about WWW at WP:ANI, and you are of course mentioned in the thread.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 14:23, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
I am not competent to argue Polish historigraphy but I don't think they are either. And IMHO they are WGR with a buzzsaw. See what Trangabellam is doing to Marcelus. This is baiting and it's exactly what they did to Minaro123 at Aryan Valley. This is wrong. Elinruby ( talk) 11:01, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for granting me the rollbacker rights. I will be using it at right place, for reverting the edits which are problematic, without removing the latter addition. Admantine123 ( talk) 18:20, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello HJ,
Last time we spoke, you granted me reviewer instead of rollbacker because of my account being too young to be familiar enough with policies. It has been a little while and I have definitely learned since then. Having to approve other users edits really tested my knowledge of policies. I understand to only use rollback on vandalism, and I am asking for you to grant rollback now.
I prefer to talk to you directly, here, as opposed to on the large public notice boards, if you were wondering why I am requesting here. - 🔥 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 19:24, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 125 | ← | Archive 127 | Archive 128 | Archive 129 | Archive 130 | Archive 131 | → | Archive 135 |
I saw you are one of the admins at Autopatrolled and I came across Pvmoutside who is a prolific stub creator, since over 10 years. At the beginning of his wikipedia career he also created some start class articles. Pvmoutside doesn't answer at the talk page, keeps creating basic stubs and was given the autopatrolled rights over 10 years ago by an editor who no longer is editing. I have seen other autopatrolled editors created mainly start class or better assessed articles before being granted autopatrolled. I wouldn't grant Pvmoutside autopatrolled and I wonder what your conclusion is. Paradise Chronicle ( talk) 11:07, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
"Ass In High Gear Award"
|
Your work as an admin is not being graded, |
Hi, recently you indefinitely blocked SapientiaLinguistica for their behavior (which was related to their activity on the article Chakavian). Yesterday was registered a new account Brack3tRedacted whose first edit was on the same article making same disruptive changes to the content. Maybe it is too soon to report them for sock investigation without further evidence (besides CheckUser). As they are not making any edits elsewhere it is enough to semi-protect the article. A long semi-protection would be good anyway. Miki Filigranski ( talk) 16:41, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Could you modify the block for 2a01:c23::/32 to include talk page access as well? see Special:Diff/1142619311 AP 499D25 ( talk) 12:54, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
In January, you blocked this IP because of the constant vandalism. Since the block expired, there have been 6 edits made from that IP, all vandalism. Wes sideman ( talk) 14:39, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello!
I really want to thank you so much for all the work that you do on Wikipedia, and for taking the time to reply to my permission request with some very helpful information and advice:)
I really want to chat about Wikipedia if that's okay? I have been very interested in being very heavily involved in Wikipedia, I would love to help a lot of people here.
I love editing on Wikipedia, it gives me something very positive to do and I really love it! I was wondering if I could ask for some advice? I really want to be extremely helpful and to see positive change done by myself. I would love to help articles become so much better and to see positive changes just like I can see on your Userpage!
Would you be able to help me? I'd love to one day have things like "50 articles heavily improved by my work" and things like that. Something to look at on my profile page and think look at this positive change I've done!
Also, what I have done so far...would you say there's some good in that?
Thanks so much I appreciate everything! MrBauer24 ( talk) 21:50, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
I presume that you did read this thread where multiple users noted GCB's baiting behaviour — including with inappropriate sexual innuendos — for a long span of time across multiple t/p(s) including threads w/o me? Also, Doug is a long time talk-page stalker with whom I have colloborated on S. Asian articles and I can assure you that he was not "warning" me. That said, you can always verify from the horse's mouth. TrangaBellam ( talk) 20:40, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I have already exceeded my limit in this discussion. However, can I give a one-two sentences answer to other participants of the discussion? Marcelus ( talk) 21:44, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Did you see my thread on VM's t/p; it was a misunderstanding on his part. Though I should have provided a diff. TrangaBellam ( talk) 16:43, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Thank you today for Operation Flavius, introduced (in 2014): "In 1988, at the height of "the Troubles" in Northern Ireland, an IRA team attempted to detonate a car bomb in Gibraltar. They were pursued by British special special forces, who shot dead three IRA members who later turned out be unarmed and not in possession of a bomb. The resulting chain reaction left another half a dozen people dead in Belfast, while a dispute over the legality of the SAS' actions raged for another seven years until a ruling from the European Court of Human Rights which left neither side entirely satisfied. This article documents that chain of events, with all its twists and turns. It's certainly been interesting, given that the subject matter is still controversial today ..."! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:22, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Joining the party on your talk page:
Although I am uninvolved in the pages in question, I posted about GCB at another page that Grabowski took issue with, Collaboration with the Axis Powers. (I was already working on the France section when I became aware of his article.) GCB was rather obstructive with respect to my attempts to verify some of his specific comments about that page, but I do not know if she realized that that is what they were. If my remarks at AE aren't helpful I'll withdraw them and file a separate ANI, but I've been working up to reporting Trangabellam, for exactly what Marcelus complains of, at a page unrelated to the Holocaust.
I have had issues with Marcelus in the past but I believe that he was similarly trying to improve deficiencies identified by Grabowski. I can probably find the link where he said that, if it would be helpful. I just read the history of the massacre article and I am not sure I agree with him, but he was trying to source it, I think.
I personally believe Trangabellam is the wrongest, but before I bring in completely unrelated subject matter I thought I should ask. The short version is that immediately after an attempt to AfD an article failed, they rewrote it to say that its topic was invalid, completely ignoring my repeated protests and attempts to discuss at the talk page. But this has nothing to do with Poland or the Holocaust.
I don't trust myself to discuss Gitz. He is, yes, polite. Anything else I would have to say about him would require diffs and I am trying to keep the scope of my comments narrow. Please ping me if you would like to see the link re Marcelus or diffs re Trangabellam at the board. Elinruby ( talk) 07:57, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
TrangaBellam rewrote it to say that its topic was invalid, completely ignoring my repeated protests and attempts to discuss at the talk page.has been discussed at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive315#Minaro123. See Elinruby's comments in part. TrangaBellam ( talk) 12:10, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Harry, Marcelus just made a proposal at Talk:Collaboration with the Axis powers (see BRD fail section), and I've invited him to develop it further. Can you please tailor whatever penalty you give him to allow that to continue? Make that page an exception or whatever? I promise not to get into a knife-fight with him, am familiar with his work, and welcome his input. It would be hard to discuss rewrites if he had a 0RR restriction. Thank you for any thought you give this. Elinruby ( talk) 00:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello HJ,
I do a lot of work reverting vandalism to Wikipedia and would like to use the tool AntiVandal. This requires Rollback, which I don’t have. I was looking at the permissions page and it looks like you are the one that reviews most requests. Do you think I am qualified? I have over 1,300 edits. I am very familiar with general Wikipedia policies and the policy on Rollback (only use on Vandalism). My CSD log may also show this. My thanks log may also be helpful. However, I have only been editing for a little over 2 weeks. I have seen editors with less edits than me get approved, but they have also had an account longer. I would also be open to a trial period. I don’t know if this would stop me from getting it, so I am asking your opinion.
If you don’t think I am qualified, tell me why, or how long I need to have been here for. If you think I am qualified, you can go ahead grant me the user right, or I can apply for it on the page.
I appreciate your feedback in advance. - 🔥 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 23:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
In addition, I was recently involved in this issue, that Rollback would be helpful in. - 🔥 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 00:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Don't you mean east of the Adriatic? Elinruby ( talk) 00:21, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
A kitten to get over the recent personal attacks directed towards you. We all are grateful for your contributions. Keep doing what you're doing.
❯❯❯
Raydann
(Talk)
20:30, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
See Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations/HuffSmurf. Not sure if the comments should be kept at all ( WP:DENY, WP:NOTHERE?). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:36, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
I don't know about page protection but the 500/30 restriction and these two ArbCom Amendments apply to that page like any other on Wikipedia [1] [2]. The 500/30 restriction was passed *precisely* to prevent this kind of nonsense. Volunteer Marek 13:52, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
21:29, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi HJ Mitchell, in the open Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 arbitration case, a remedy or finding of fact has been proposed which relates to you.
You are not directly affected by any proposed sanction; this is just for your information.
Your name appears on the page only once because you had partially blocked ZaniGiovanni, and this is mentioned in ZaniGiovanni's "sanction history" section.
Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 21:53, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Making personal attacks, [5] and a brief look over their contributions since returning from the block suggests much the same sort of edit warring and tendentious behavior as well as building an extensive "case" in their sandbox showing that they did not learn the lesson of the block at all. Andre 🚐 00:58, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
We're not going to "de-news" the opening sentence of the article of, um, Fox News. Their journalistic integrity is certainly in tatters as the Dominion lawsuit exposes a lot of nefarious, partisan activities behind the curtain. All of that can and should go into the article, but let's stay grounded in reality in how the lede describes the subject.
"a shot across the bow". I found that wording from the Admin curiously hostile and ironic, considering he admission that the block was for both the "run around processing" and incivility. The idea of being "shot and sunk" for non-compliance is quite a metaphorA shot across the bow means a warning. One you seem to have avoided heeding. You have continued to make unsubstantiated allegations such as
This is hallmark sealioning.As far as the discussion with @ Zaathras, Zaathras and I have a perfectly good and collegial relationship on wiki and probably agree on most things. I somewhat jocularly and sarcastically made a joke at Fox's expense (as indicated by the italics) but was saying that Zaathras was being reasonable. The only person out of line here is you with your continued aspersions and attacks. Andre 🚐 01:02, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello. I tried to notify you from the above user’s ( User talk:Aviram7) talk page that they are proving too hair-trigger in their use of their newly acquired rollback or rights, reverting a thank you I put on my own talk page to a welcome from User:Fragrant Peony as unconstructive. That, simply, is not cricket (even if their edit and my response to it on my talk page have since been erased by them). 2601:196:180:8D80:ADA2:986A:1D5F:F14D ( talk) 07:46, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
At User:IBangedUrDad666 1AmNobody24 ( talk) 19:21, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
I practically just got the e-mail out, went back to look, only to see the article and the AfD revdel'd and the offender indeffed, in a matter of moments. Damn fast work, and thank you! Ravenswing 20:50, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for what you did at
[14]. @
RegentsPark and @
Bishonen were trying to save Trangabellam as usual. (This time they failed.) Thanks for not falling for it and the logged warning. (I am sorry if speaking against admins in this way is a policy violation, but I don't know how to put it in any other way.)
Akshaypatill (
talk)
06:59, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Dear HJ Mitchell, Sorry for this request to but
I have exicted to remove vandalism, so I think i eligible for PCR rights because I aware about that my home Wikipedia is hi. Wikipedia but i like to editing on english Wikipedia i not more edits on here but i only revert vandalism on enwiki, this is a great work for me, If I get a chance to review other users' edits here, rest as you wish.kinds regards →
αѵίɾαʍ7
([ʆεt'ς tαʆƘ🇮🇳])←
15:56, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello sir, my name is TheManishPanwar. I am also interested in vandalism removal. But. [ Changes] will go quickly. So as I get it made, I am not able to remove it. Can you please give rollback rights. Manish Panwar ( talk) | Contribs) 06:37, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
You are reverting away from BRD. user boldly removed the content, I reverted. It is theirs to take to the talk page. We've hashed it out there before including source discussions: Talk:Laurence_Olivier/Archive 4#sfn "no target" error. As far as i can tell, SC simply waited several months to remove the content they didn't like, that was added by several editors. — Shibbolethink ( ♔ ♕) 13:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
As far as i can tell, SC simply waited several months to remove the content they didn't like, that was added by several editors”. Aside from it only being added by one editor ( you), rather than the “several” you claim, I can’t quite parse your comment with “
I don't think it was done in bad faith, and I'm not alleging any misconduct here”, which is exactly what you’re doing, but never mind. It’s also false to try and claim that I removed it because I “
didn't like” it. Please don’t try and assign motives to people when you don’t understand what your saying. - SchroCat ( talk) 16:54, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
you don’t understand what your saying.
Hi HJ I came across your commentary on the Prince Harry page and you seem reasonable. I think the page is out of control and continues to add too much information. I don’t think Wikipedia is supposed to be a replacement for buying a book or reading the news. So much on his page is propaganda from tabloids that he is currently in a lawsuit against for phone hacking and listening device inside home etc… The moderator is convinced that it’s reasonable to add whatever is reported or the tabloids find newsworthy. This has been an ongoing issue with same moderator for years. I mean to include how Harry lost his virginity? Just let people buy the book. Also, talking heads are paid to speak, I don’t want to go the route of adding talking heads that agree with Harry, I just don’t think it should be included at all. DigitialNomad ( talk) 18:43, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I have a problem with one of the users. I don't know if this behavior is normal and acceptable on Wikipedia, but I find it very unpleasant. I don't want to start AE or AI again, but if this behavior breaks any rules, I would ask you to say to this user not to that. I don't want any bans, sanctions, just simple intervention (if it's required).
As you know I have 0RR restrictions imposed on Eastern Europe. Pofka is taking advantage of this, and in every discussion we take part in brings up the sanctions imposed on me. Which is all the more strange because he himself recently had a complete block on editing in topics about Lithuania (and I think also Poland) for personal attacks against me. Recently, this ban was revoked. I would understand if the discussion was about my behavior, then invoking the sanctions would make sense. But these are always purely content-related discussions. In this situation, I feel that the constant bringing up of my sanctions is aimed at discrediting me, changing attitudes towards my arguments, etc.
Examples:
When I asked him to stop doing this, he simply deleted my question from his talk page. What do you think about it? Marcelus ( talk) 19:51, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello HJ Mitchell,
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland/Evidence. Please add your evidence by April 04, 2023, which is when the first evidence phase closes. Submitted evidence will be summarized by Arbitrators and Clerks at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland/Evidence/Summary. Owing to the summary style, editors are encouraged to submit evidence in small chunks sooner rather than more complete evidence later.
Details about the summary page, the two phases of evidence, a timeline and other answers to frequently asked questions can be found at the case's FAQ page.
For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration.
For the Arbitration Committee,
~ ToBeFree (
talk)
00:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I am curious if there is a page that explains what a recent changes patroller is, as I remember you saying something about that. I tried looking at the user access levels page but I can not find it. If you know of one can I see the page that explains it? -- Grapefanatic ( talk) 12:14, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I see you have protected the title “ Coke Studio Tamil” for being recreated several times. Therefore, I can not edit the title. However, I think it maybe redirected to Coke Studio (Indian TV program)#Coke Studio Tamil for reference. Can you create the redirection page? I will be glad if you ping me for any other opinion. Regards — Meghmollar2017 ( U T C) — 18:42, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi HJ Mitchell. Considering the fact that you are the administrator who deleted this article, I thought maybe I needed to bring this draft to your attention because it appears to be endorsing the same individual who has presented himself as a footballer or singer on multiple occasions. Can an administrator delete a draft, or should we just wait out on the incubating period which is usually 6 months if I'm not mistaken? Keivan.f Talk 14:47, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Harry, Is it time to put a "retired" notice on his user page? And hide the last para on being a current WMUK trustee etc? It's over 2 years since he edited, sadly. Perhaps you could ask the great man? Best Johnbod ( talk) 16:55, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi HJ, You blocked me for one week for "disruptive editing", although honestly I did not see anything disruptive in my editing. But, be that as it may, in my opinion the people who cheered for me to get blocked were much worse offenders of Wikipedia rules. Unfortunately, it appears to me that no one really bothered to read what I had to write, what others wrote, and the content I had attempted to edit. You write above that one should not assume bad faith on the part of other editors, but that is exactly what was done in my case. In fact, given the opportunity, I could, not only say but prove the same for some others (did I mention an editor or an admin? No :). Before I act against some who I believe violate Wikipedia rules knowingly and brazenly, and who claimed bad faith on my part while knowing better, I would like to learn your view of exactly why you went ahead and blocked me. Please write. I will not get upset, but I do consider sometimes how some people can get away with what they do, and that does upset me. Thank you. 70.164.212.36 ( talk) 22:32, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
HJ, I opened a thread about WWW at WP:ANI, and you are of course mentioned in the thread.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 14:23, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
I am not competent to argue Polish historigraphy but I don't think they are either. And IMHO they are WGR with a buzzsaw. See what Trangabellam is doing to Marcelus. This is baiting and it's exactly what they did to Minaro123 at Aryan Valley. This is wrong. Elinruby ( talk) 11:01, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for granting me the rollbacker rights. I will be using it at right place, for reverting the edits which are problematic, without removing the latter addition. Admantine123 ( talk) 18:20, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello HJ,
Last time we spoke, you granted me reviewer instead of rollbacker because of my account being too young to be familiar enough with policies. It has been a little while and I have definitely learned since then. Having to approve other users edits really tested my knowledge of policies. I understand to only use rollback on vandalism, and I am asking for you to grant rollback now.
I prefer to talk to you directly, here, as opposed to on the large public notice boards, if you were wondering why I am requesting here. - 🔥 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 19:24, 18 March 2023 (UTC)