Cheers from Canada! ;-) -- Rob NS 02:30, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
"Hi there RobNS, thank you for your wishes, that's very nice of you." Gryffindor 21:19, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
The template {{nobots}} is supposed to help. You might want to check out the Template:Bots page for fuller information. Bishonen | talk 19:44, 12 May 2008 (UTC).
Gryffindor, as much as I prefer royal titles, I must say that the recent moves of some archdukes should probably be discussed. Are you going to move Otto von Habsburg to Otto, Crown Prince of Austria? Where WP:NC(NT) is concerned is only when royal titling is included in the name and then what form it takes. It doesn't mean that all titled people absolutely must have titles. Also, few of the Habsburgs use the -Lothringen part. Habsburg friends of friends of mine don't. On that basis, why didn't you move Francesca to Francesca Habsburg-Lothringen to match her husband or why didn't you move both of them, to Archduchess Francesca of Austria and Archduke Karl of Austria? I think you should revert the moves are start a move request. Now, if you want to move Franz Joseph I of Austria to Francis Joseph I of Austria... Charles 23:49, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Image:Wiener Zeitung.PNG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Wiener Zeitung.PNG|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
BJ
Talk
13:56, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BZÖ Logo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Geniac ( talk) 14:52, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
HI I am informing you on the following discussions referring to the usage of diacritics on en.wiki. It seem there is a movement/campaign of some peple (moreover administrators) which try to eliminate them from the usage on en .wiki. Or at least to minimize , even for personal names in Latin script
Since I have seen your name in some discussions I thought it would be nice to inform you. Pay attention to the following pages : WP:UE , Wikipedia:Usage of diacritics and similar ones if you are interested. Anto ( talk) 20:04, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi! Since you have been involved in the interminable Alto Adige/South Tyrol/Province of Bolzano-Bozen debate I'd like your opinion on some heavy editing which is being done on the History of South Tyrol page by an anonymous user. I have made my objections clear on the talk page, it would be nice to have some more users take a look at the situation. Thanks, Pcassitti ( talk) 18:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
The Turkish Barnstar of National Merit | ||
I, CeeGee, award you the Turkish Barnstar of National Merit in appreciation of your continuous efforts to create and improve Culture of the Ottoman Empire related pages in English Wikipedia. Keep it up! CeeGee ( talk) 15:41, 25 June 2008 (UTC) |
Why have you moved this page from its correct name, with no discussion or consultatation? Please see talk page. Giano ( talk) 15:20, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
As with many things in Wikipedia, figuring out just how to nominate an entry to be considered for deletion is taking far longer than I currently have the time for. This would be my first such article, as I have a pretty high tolerance for "notablity." Yet this one fairly screams for it: Party Unity My Ass. For one, that's not the name of the organization (see the reference section). Another, there are virtually no sources for any of the material concerning the make up of these related organizations. RoyBatty42 ( talk) 23:00, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi.
If I implemented the same changes (particularly the more discreet wrapsensitive dividers and cross-browser-compliant linewrap handling) to the Royal Palaces UK template -- perhaps itself renamed to
Template:Royal palaces in the United Kingdom -- would you feel able to accept them?
Also, please forgive my ignorance, but why is Eski Palace singled out as "historical"?
Sardanaphalus (
talk)
01:03, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
{{nowrap begin}}
before a string of links, attach {{·w}}
to the end of each link, then place {{nowrap begin}}
after the string of links);Thanks for uploading Image:Grand Duchess Maria Vladimirovna of Russia.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ( ESkog)( Talk) 17:35, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Princess Stephanie of Windisch-Graetz.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn ( talk) 18:06, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Your recent name change for this article troubles me. To be blunt, my preference would be to disagree, to dispute, to revert what you've done. Unfortunately, I can only think of favorable arguments which support your edit as entirely appropriate and as WP:MOS-consistent. In the absence of anything substantive, I'm forced to conclude not only that your edit was justified, but that I was just plain wrong. Puzzling, but there you have it. If this feeble dissent comes to represent the worst criticism you encounter over the course of the summer, then clearly -- you must have done something praiseworthy. For now, I guess I'll just have to ponder a bit more ... and maybe I'll come up with something a bit more constructive. -- Tenmei ( talk) 19:09, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey Gryffindor, just want to let you know that I mentioned your name at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (names and titles)#Anglocentric. Cheers, Olessi ( talk) 01:39, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
|
This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from
this list.
As a side note, Gryffindor, because you have the nobots string on your page, I had to deliver this by hand. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please let me know and I will be sure to remove you from the list. Shalom-
L'Aquatique
happy fourth!
04:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
As you took part in the last Great Beer Cat Discussion, I thought you might be interested in this one: A discussion has been opened on changes that have been made to the existing Beer category system. The changes reverse the decision made by the Project in April 2006. The changes were based on agreement by only two people, and by a discussion that took place outside the Beer Project. There may be some merit in the changes, and to prevent future conflict it is important that there is some discussion of the matter. If you're interested, please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Beer#Brewery_cats. SilkTork * YES! 18:22, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
If you had looked at the Cfd debate you would have seen you have set up a duplicate to this long-standing category. In any case we do NOT just remove Cfd tags we don't like - see WP:CFD. Now you have set up the oddly named Category:Secular and Ecclesiastical Treasury, for what is known in English as the Imperial Treasury Schatzkammer, or just the Schatzkammer, Vienna. Johnbod ( talk) 21:53, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Members of the House of Savoy use(d) the title "prince(ss) of Savoy" even when the head of the house was king of Sicily, or king of Sardinia, or king of Italy. Just because the head of a house uses a particular title, does not necessarily mean that the cadet members use a comparable one - another example is the Hohenzollerns (the head was German Emperor, the heir was German Crown Prince, the cadets were "only" princes of Prussia). Noel S McFerran ( talk) 23:02, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi again. Looked like the template was missing the "name" entry and a </noinclude> tag. Seems to be working okay now. Sardanaphalus ( talk) 22:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia's image policy states numerous images used in an article must be relevant to the text of the article, not necessarily the subject. As stated in my edit summary, multiple images are not needed in a tour article unless they demonstrate something significant about the article's content. Your images do not do that, they just display Minogue performing during the various acts thus their inclusion in the article is completely irrelevant. I understand that this is your own work and you would like to display it but Wikipedia is not a personal website nor is it a hosting server. Having a link to your images to Wiki Commons is suitable enough for the article. Dancefloor royalty ( talk) 09:02, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi! I'm working on Austrian legislative election, 2008 and remember working together with you some time ago on Austrian political parties; I could use your help: I'm trying to locate photos of Faymann, Molterer and Dinkhauser (and a short article on Faymann couldn't hurt, either). Could you help me with any of that? — Nightstallion 11:34, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Girolamo Savonarola ( talk) 07:08, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Hey - long time no talk. Been pretty busy. Need your administrative help in deleting a copied image. As you will see on the Provinces of Italy page, User:Supparluca is causing trouble trying to replace an image I had with alternate naming (from commons) with one he copied from me and is trying to put in based on Italian language only. The image should be deleted (Image Trentino-Alto Adige Provinces.png) and Supparluca needs to be told to cease his actions. Rarelibra ( talk) 19:16, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
I wonder if you might have a view to express in the following context:
I have expressed an opinion, but I'm not certain that my views are necessarily more important than anyone else's. -- Tenmei ( talk) 17:51, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
I see that you are an admin but please do not move article titles that possibly have consensus, unilaterally. I am confident that if you decide to put in a request for move, the current title, Holy Crown of Hungary which is most well known and correct (the current crown is not actually the same as the one worn by Saint Stephen), will be retained during the discussion. Hobartimus ( talk) 23:24, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
I could use your input HERE. THanks! Rarelibra ( talk) 19:10, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Please read Talk:El Escorial, where I set out my reasons for moving it back to the common name and pointed out the big differences between El Escorial and Versailles. Wikipedia policy is to use common name - absolutely nobody calls it the "Royal Seat of San Lorenzo de El Escorial"! Discuss before you make a move like this. There were good reasons for it to be named this in the first place. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 08:51, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
I added the map you uploaded to the Judenplatz article. Hope you don't mind. One day perhaps it would be beneficial to add a key and some locations to it maybe zooming in on the square. This image is another really powerful addition to the article. Thanks for your uploads, its good to see your photography on this article. DVD 19:26, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Plavalaguna, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rodhull andemu 02:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Plavalaguna, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plavalaguna. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Rodhull andemu 03:00, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi Gryffindor. Sorry to give you that trouble. However, I still think the names can be shortened, namely the ones with lots of surnames. It seems to me that the rule #8 "No family or middle names" (even though it is for monarchs) could be applied here. Besides, that seems to be the overall feeling of the section "Other royals" (not sure this applies to dukes too, either, but anyway, what I'm talking about here is simplification of overly long article titles). Finally, there's also the rule #4: Numerals are not generally used. Example: Prince Richard, Duke of Gloucester, not "Prince Richard, 2nd Duke of Gloucester".(in section "Royals with a substantive title"). So what do you say to all this? -- Waldir talk 19:41, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 10:22, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
What do you meen by "Better image"? I put the previous image in the template because it fitted better than the rest of the tall buildings images. The template does not look very simetric right now. Cheers! Mario 1987 09:26, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
I tried to put another image of a tall building in my hometown, one of the tallest in Romania but the other editors didn't agree. Sorry and cheers! Mario 1987 20:15, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Cheers from Canada! ;-) -- Rob NS 02:30, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
"Hi there RobNS, thank you for your wishes, that's very nice of you." Gryffindor 21:19, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
The template {{nobots}} is supposed to help. You might want to check out the Template:Bots page for fuller information. Bishonen | talk 19:44, 12 May 2008 (UTC).
Gryffindor, as much as I prefer royal titles, I must say that the recent moves of some archdukes should probably be discussed. Are you going to move Otto von Habsburg to Otto, Crown Prince of Austria? Where WP:NC(NT) is concerned is only when royal titling is included in the name and then what form it takes. It doesn't mean that all titled people absolutely must have titles. Also, few of the Habsburgs use the -Lothringen part. Habsburg friends of friends of mine don't. On that basis, why didn't you move Francesca to Francesca Habsburg-Lothringen to match her husband or why didn't you move both of them, to Archduchess Francesca of Austria and Archduke Karl of Austria? I think you should revert the moves are start a move request. Now, if you want to move Franz Joseph I of Austria to Francis Joseph I of Austria... Charles 23:49, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Image:Wiener Zeitung.PNG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Wiener Zeitung.PNG|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
BJ
Talk
13:56, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BZÖ Logo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Geniac ( talk) 14:52, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
HI I am informing you on the following discussions referring to the usage of diacritics on en.wiki. It seem there is a movement/campaign of some peple (moreover administrators) which try to eliminate them from the usage on en .wiki. Or at least to minimize , even for personal names in Latin script
Since I have seen your name in some discussions I thought it would be nice to inform you. Pay attention to the following pages : WP:UE , Wikipedia:Usage of diacritics and similar ones if you are interested. Anto ( talk) 20:04, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi! Since you have been involved in the interminable Alto Adige/South Tyrol/Province of Bolzano-Bozen debate I'd like your opinion on some heavy editing which is being done on the History of South Tyrol page by an anonymous user. I have made my objections clear on the talk page, it would be nice to have some more users take a look at the situation. Thanks, Pcassitti ( talk) 18:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
The Turkish Barnstar of National Merit | ||
I, CeeGee, award you the Turkish Barnstar of National Merit in appreciation of your continuous efforts to create and improve Culture of the Ottoman Empire related pages in English Wikipedia. Keep it up! CeeGee ( talk) 15:41, 25 June 2008 (UTC) |
Why have you moved this page from its correct name, with no discussion or consultatation? Please see talk page. Giano ( talk) 15:20, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
As with many things in Wikipedia, figuring out just how to nominate an entry to be considered for deletion is taking far longer than I currently have the time for. This would be my first such article, as I have a pretty high tolerance for "notablity." Yet this one fairly screams for it: Party Unity My Ass. For one, that's not the name of the organization (see the reference section). Another, there are virtually no sources for any of the material concerning the make up of these related organizations. RoyBatty42 ( talk) 23:00, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi.
If I implemented the same changes (particularly the more discreet wrapsensitive dividers and cross-browser-compliant linewrap handling) to the Royal Palaces UK template -- perhaps itself renamed to
Template:Royal palaces in the United Kingdom -- would you feel able to accept them?
Also, please forgive my ignorance, but why is Eski Palace singled out as "historical"?
Sardanaphalus (
talk)
01:03, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
{{nowrap begin}}
before a string of links, attach {{·w}}
to the end of each link, then place {{nowrap begin}}
after the string of links);Thanks for uploading Image:Grand Duchess Maria Vladimirovna of Russia.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ( ESkog)( Talk) 17:35, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Princess Stephanie of Windisch-Graetz.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn ( talk) 18:06, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Your recent name change for this article troubles me. To be blunt, my preference would be to disagree, to dispute, to revert what you've done. Unfortunately, I can only think of favorable arguments which support your edit as entirely appropriate and as WP:MOS-consistent. In the absence of anything substantive, I'm forced to conclude not only that your edit was justified, but that I was just plain wrong. Puzzling, but there you have it. If this feeble dissent comes to represent the worst criticism you encounter over the course of the summer, then clearly -- you must have done something praiseworthy. For now, I guess I'll just have to ponder a bit more ... and maybe I'll come up with something a bit more constructive. -- Tenmei ( talk) 19:09, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey Gryffindor, just want to let you know that I mentioned your name at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (names and titles)#Anglocentric. Cheers, Olessi ( talk) 01:39, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
|
This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from
this list.
As a side note, Gryffindor, because you have the nobots string on your page, I had to deliver this by hand. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please let me know and I will be sure to remove you from the list. Shalom-
L'Aquatique
happy fourth!
04:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
As you took part in the last Great Beer Cat Discussion, I thought you might be interested in this one: A discussion has been opened on changes that have been made to the existing Beer category system. The changes reverse the decision made by the Project in April 2006. The changes were based on agreement by only two people, and by a discussion that took place outside the Beer Project. There may be some merit in the changes, and to prevent future conflict it is important that there is some discussion of the matter. If you're interested, please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Beer#Brewery_cats. SilkTork * YES! 18:22, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
If you had looked at the Cfd debate you would have seen you have set up a duplicate to this long-standing category. In any case we do NOT just remove Cfd tags we don't like - see WP:CFD. Now you have set up the oddly named Category:Secular and Ecclesiastical Treasury, for what is known in English as the Imperial Treasury Schatzkammer, or just the Schatzkammer, Vienna. Johnbod ( talk) 21:53, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Members of the House of Savoy use(d) the title "prince(ss) of Savoy" even when the head of the house was king of Sicily, or king of Sardinia, or king of Italy. Just because the head of a house uses a particular title, does not necessarily mean that the cadet members use a comparable one - another example is the Hohenzollerns (the head was German Emperor, the heir was German Crown Prince, the cadets were "only" princes of Prussia). Noel S McFerran ( talk) 23:02, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi again. Looked like the template was missing the "name" entry and a </noinclude> tag. Seems to be working okay now. Sardanaphalus ( talk) 22:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia's image policy states numerous images used in an article must be relevant to the text of the article, not necessarily the subject. As stated in my edit summary, multiple images are not needed in a tour article unless they demonstrate something significant about the article's content. Your images do not do that, they just display Minogue performing during the various acts thus their inclusion in the article is completely irrelevant. I understand that this is your own work and you would like to display it but Wikipedia is not a personal website nor is it a hosting server. Having a link to your images to Wiki Commons is suitable enough for the article. Dancefloor royalty ( talk) 09:02, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi! I'm working on Austrian legislative election, 2008 and remember working together with you some time ago on Austrian political parties; I could use your help: I'm trying to locate photos of Faymann, Molterer and Dinkhauser (and a short article on Faymann couldn't hurt, either). Could you help me with any of that? — Nightstallion 11:34, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Girolamo Savonarola ( talk) 07:08, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Hey - long time no talk. Been pretty busy. Need your administrative help in deleting a copied image. As you will see on the Provinces of Italy page, User:Supparluca is causing trouble trying to replace an image I had with alternate naming (from commons) with one he copied from me and is trying to put in based on Italian language only. The image should be deleted (Image Trentino-Alto Adige Provinces.png) and Supparluca needs to be told to cease his actions. Rarelibra ( talk) 19:16, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
I wonder if you might have a view to express in the following context:
I have expressed an opinion, but I'm not certain that my views are necessarily more important than anyone else's. -- Tenmei ( talk) 17:51, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
I see that you are an admin but please do not move article titles that possibly have consensus, unilaterally. I am confident that if you decide to put in a request for move, the current title, Holy Crown of Hungary which is most well known and correct (the current crown is not actually the same as the one worn by Saint Stephen), will be retained during the discussion. Hobartimus ( talk) 23:24, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
I could use your input HERE. THanks! Rarelibra ( talk) 19:10, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Please read Talk:El Escorial, where I set out my reasons for moving it back to the common name and pointed out the big differences between El Escorial and Versailles. Wikipedia policy is to use common name - absolutely nobody calls it the "Royal Seat of San Lorenzo de El Escorial"! Discuss before you make a move like this. There were good reasons for it to be named this in the first place. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 08:51, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
I added the map you uploaded to the Judenplatz article. Hope you don't mind. One day perhaps it would be beneficial to add a key and some locations to it maybe zooming in on the square. This image is another really powerful addition to the article. Thanks for your uploads, its good to see your photography on this article. DVD 19:26, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Plavalaguna, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rodhull andemu 02:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Plavalaguna, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plavalaguna. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Rodhull andemu 03:00, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi Gryffindor. Sorry to give you that trouble. However, I still think the names can be shortened, namely the ones with lots of surnames. It seems to me that the rule #8 "No family or middle names" (even though it is for monarchs) could be applied here. Besides, that seems to be the overall feeling of the section "Other royals" (not sure this applies to dukes too, either, but anyway, what I'm talking about here is simplification of overly long article titles). Finally, there's also the rule #4: Numerals are not generally used. Example: Prince Richard, Duke of Gloucester, not "Prince Richard, 2nd Duke of Gloucester".(in section "Royals with a substantive title"). So what do you say to all this? -- Waldir talk 19:41, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 10:22, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
What do you meen by "Better image"? I put the previous image in the template because it fitted better than the rest of the tall buildings images. The template does not look very simetric right now. Cheers! Mario 1987 09:26, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
I tried to put another image of a tall building in my hometown, one of the tallest in Romania but the other editors didn't agree. Sorry and cheers! Mario 1987 20:15, 22 December 2008 (UTC)