This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
My 100 Favorite Albums Of All Time. These are my 100 favorite albums of all time. This list is arranged in order of preference, starting with my #1 favorite. Grundle2600 ( talk) 22:25, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Well, 1 out of 100 at least; the pre-sellout Liz Phair. Tarc ( talk) 15:11, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
My 50 Favorite Movies Of All Time. These are my 50 favorite movies of all time. This list is arranged in order of preference, starting with my #1 favorite. Grundle2600 ( talk) 00:17, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bill Gates public domain mugshot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 07:07, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Pro gay-marriage, pro-choice, pro-healthcare reform, STAUNCHLY anti-obama? Interesting... -- King Öomie 19:32, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Haha. Why don't more people realize that "a long time ago" is catching up with us? Grsz 11 06:30, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Unable to resist bacon's temptations, rogue editors have kicked off the Bacon Challenge 2010 before the New Year even starts! This is a fun and collegial event and all are welcome. There are many non-pork articles for editors who enjoy some sizzle, but object to or don't like messing with pig products. This year's event also includes a Bacon WikiCup 2010 for those who may want to keep score and enjoy engaging in friendly competition. Given the critical importance of this subject matter, I know you will want to participate, so remember to sign up today and get started A.S.A.P. ALL ARE WELCOME!!! The more the merrier. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 22:39, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Please don't add utterly meaningless diagrams to Climatic Research Unit e-mail hacking incident that have nothing to do with the hacking incident whatsoever. Also, please don't use diagrams culled from a blog written by a climate change skeptic, sourced from Willis Eschenbach who is a well-known climate change denier. At least make some effort to be neutral! -- Scjessey ( talk) 00:20, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Oh, come on Grundle. If an article (which is a blog) starts with:"James Delingpole is a writer, journalist and broadcaster who is right about everything. He is the author of numerous fantastically entertaining books..." you should see the red flags w/o the need of someone pointing it out to you. I usually wouldn't bother to tell you but you're doing this over and over again, not reading a news article in whole, edit and then leave it to others to "fix" it. The Artificial intelligence's article comes to my mind where I had to fix some minor but yet fundamental facts of your edit which would have not been necessary if you just would have done some simple research on your own before editing. You can do better than this. The Magnificent Clean-keeper ( talk) 01:01, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Stick to the facts. It's irrelevant what Robin Williams has to say about genitals. Enigma msg 03:35, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Please keep jokes off the talk page as well. I'm sure you can find an appropriate webforum for those.-- Chaser ( talk) 04:30, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Seriously [please see edit summary [1] ]: Could it be that all your "problems" you've encountered here on Wiki are just the result of missing blood flow to a certain upper area within your human body at times? The Magnificent Clean-keeper ( talk) 18:42, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
"Hint": Start with information, not with alleged wp:or and wp:synth hypocorism.-- The Magnificent Clean-keeper ( talk) 00:56, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Please stop trying to suppress information.
What?????????? (copy and paste post from my talkpage to keep it together) Millions of people turn to wikipedia every day for information. On websites, blogs, and message boards all over the internet, people are referring to the Diane Francis wikipedia article's claim that she has two children. The fact that you removed such information in this edit is something which should be of concern to anyone who favor wikipedia's policy of openness. It is very common for wikipedia biographies to cite the children of the article's subject. Please stop trying to remove this relevant, well sourced information from this article. Grundle2600 ( talk) 22:38, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
I seem to have joined the ranks of those "supprsessing information" according to your talk message. Your obsession with this looks unhealthy; please try to remain calm William M. Connolley ( talk) 08:23, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Hypocrisy seems to be epidemic. Maybe science will develop an antidote or a vaccine against it some day. This would be far more useful than the current focus on perfecting tricks to push personal agendas while fighting disclosure and transparency. Enjoy your fame and fortune. ;) Cheers. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 18:13, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Materialscientist ( talk) 02:42, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. You know better than that. Stop it. PhGustaf ( talk) 19:46, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
My 100 Favorite Albums Of All Time. These are my 100 favorite albums of all time. This list is arranged in order of preference, starting with my #1 favorite. Grundle2600 ( talk) 22:25, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Well, 1 out of 100 at least; the pre-sellout Liz Phair. Tarc ( talk) 15:11, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
My 50 Favorite Movies Of All Time. These are my 50 favorite movies of all time. This list is arranged in order of preference, starting with my #1 favorite. Grundle2600 ( talk) 00:17, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bill Gates public domain mugshot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 07:07, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Pro gay-marriage, pro-choice, pro-healthcare reform, STAUNCHLY anti-obama? Interesting... -- King Öomie 19:32, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Haha. Why don't more people realize that "a long time ago" is catching up with us? Grsz 11 06:30, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Unable to resist bacon's temptations, rogue editors have kicked off the Bacon Challenge 2010 before the New Year even starts! This is a fun and collegial event and all are welcome. There are many non-pork articles for editors who enjoy some sizzle, but object to or don't like messing with pig products. This year's event also includes a Bacon WikiCup 2010 for those who may want to keep score and enjoy engaging in friendly competition. Given the critical importance of this subject matter, I know you will want to participate, so remember to sign up today and get started A.S.A.P. ALL ARE WELCOME!!! The more the merrier. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 22:39, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Please don't add utterly meaningless diagrams to Climatic Research Unit e-mail hacking incident that have nothing to do with the hacking incident whatsoever. Also, please don't use diagrams culled from a blog written by a climate change skeptic, sourced from Willis Eschenbach who is a well-known climate change denier. At least make some effort to be neutral! -- Scjessey ( talk) 00:20, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Oh, come on Grundle. If an article (which is a blog) starts with:"James Delingpole is a writer, journalist and broadcaster who is right about everything. He is the author of numerous fantastically entertaining books..." you should see the red flags w/o the need of someone pointing it out to you. I usually wouldn't bother to tell you but you're doing this over and over again, not reading a news article in whole, edit and then leave it to others to "fix" it. The Artificial intelligence's article comes to my mind where I had to fix some minor but yet fundamental facts of your edit which would have not been necessary if you just would have done some simple research on your own before editing. You can do better than this. The Magnificent Clean-keeper ( talk) 01:01, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Stick to the facts. It's irrelevant what Robin Williams has to say about genitals. Enigma msg 03:35, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Please keep jokes off the talk page as well. I'm sure you can find an appropriate webforum for those.-- Chaser ( talk) 04:30, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Seriously [please see edit summary [1] ]: Could it be that all your "problems" you've encountered here on Wiki are just the result of missing blood flow to a certain upper area within your human body at times? The Magnificent Clean-keeper ( talk) 18:42, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
"Hint": Start with information, not with alleged wp:or and wp:synth hypocorism.-- The Magnificent Clean-keeper ( talk) 00:56, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Please stop trying to suppress information.
What?????????? (copy and paste post from my talkpage to keep it together) Millions of people turn to wikipedia every day for information. On websites, blogs, and message boards all over the internet, people are referring to the Diane Francis wikipedia article's claim that she has two children. The fact that you removed such information in this edit is something which should be of concern to anyone who favor wikipedia's policy of openness. It is very common for wikipedia biographies to cite the children of the article's subject. Please stop trying to remove this relevant, well sourced information from this article. Grundle2600 ( talk) 22:38, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
I seem to have joined the ranks of those "supprsessing information" according to your talk message. Your obsession with this looks unhealthy; please try to remain calm William M. Connolley ( talk) 08:23, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Hypocrisy seems to be epidemic. Maybe science will develop an antidote or a vaccine against it some day. This would be far more useful than the current focus on perfecting tricks to push personal agendas while fighting disclosure and transparency. Enjoy your fame and fortune. ;) Cheers. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 18:13, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Materialscientist ( talk) 02:42, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. You know better than that. Stop it. PhGustaf ( talk) 19:46, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |