This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This user was a participant in the 2nd Great Wikipedia Dramaout, improving articles from January 18–22, 2010. |
Please always free free to post friendly messages on my talk page, even during the dramaout.
For those of you who wish to file ANI complaints to get me blocked or banned, please wait until the dramaout is over. Thank you.
Grundle2600 ( talk) 03:47, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Mhmm, you seem to repeat Republican talking points there. Any personal ("self-made") thoughts about this from your side? Sorry, but I can't post over there as I don't subscribe to political forums, I just read them. Although you made it clear that you stand for what you think and write, if you'd prefer to keep such things rather private I'll promise to respond to your off-wiki posts by e-mail in the future (if I have an itch to say or ask you something). Best, The Magnificent Clean-keeper ( talk) 20:31, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Just a quick reminder that the Second Great Wikipedia Dramaout has begun. Please log any work you do at Wikipedia:The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/2nd/Log. Good luck! -- Jayron 32 01:56, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the picture, ChildofMidnight! Grundle2600 ( talk) 18:09, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
I predict Martha Coakley wins. I don't think Massachusetts is ready for real change. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 19:04, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Uh oh! What happened to Heart Kun's photo??? More censorship? Speaking of which, it's an interesting Supreme Court decision that came down. I think it's strange that individual political contributions are so limited (which has helped encourage all these shady PACs) while groups are allowed to spend unlimited amounts. I'm not sure I disagree with the decision, but it seems counter to the previous decision and McCain Feingold. The idea that you or I could't spend money making a political movie does seem undemocratic. I think campaign speech should be allowed in all cases as long as there is transparency. McCain really fouled that one up. And how about this John Edwards saga. And now he's in Haiti making even more children? Crazy. Two Americas indeed. I'll stick with mine and leave Al Gore, John Edwards, the Clintons, and all these wacko cultist bullies running around here to there's, thank you very much. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 00:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
That video could've been funny if it wouldn't be so extremely offensive. If you just would know and understand the original words (even so they are from a movie) you wouldn't have posted it. But as usual, you don't think about what you see and read; you just repeat. Shame on you? Not really, because you just don't know better and that's the pity and shame.-- The Magnificent Clean-keeper ( talk) 20:09, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
And BTW: Ron Paul didn't and sure never would endorse such crap. He's way much smarter than this (and probably would kick your ass to outher space just for posting such shit). The Magnificent Clean-keeper ( talk) 20:18, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Markus (prostitute) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —
Ecw.Technoid.Dweeb |
contributions |
talk |
☮✌☮ 21:04, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
I love the name you gave this file!! File:Tramp Stamp Barbie.jpg. Have you seen File:Oreo Fun Barbie.jpg? ROFL Dillard 421♂♂ ( talk to me) 03:08, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Chimpcam, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chimpcam. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 16:36, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
I hope you'll do DYKs for them. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 21:05, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Materialscientist ( talk) 18:01, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Please stop POV-pushing all over Wikipedia. It amazes me that you haven't been indefinitely blocked for your appalling behavior. -- Scjessey ( talk) 01:58, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Who else besides me is planning to watch Puppy Bowl VI on February 7? Grundle2600 ( talk) 02:48, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Grundle, McCartney clearly doesn’t say “fuck”, so what is the point here? A lot of pointless things have been published about the band over time, and surely we have to discriminate between what is relevant and what is just wrong? Stuff like this is distracting, and devalues the article, I think. Also, highlighting fuck just makes it look like you’re trying to be mischievous. I would like to remove it all. What do you say? -- Patthedog ( talk) 12:16, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
I think this is an interesting editorial [2]. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 17:53, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Your not a true libertarian. Don't you realize that it is communist to support universal healthcare? 199.8.158.121 ( talk) 20:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Murder of Jennifer Daugherty requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
-Zeus-
u|
c 22:29, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Murder of Jennifer Daugherty, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Jennifer Daugherty. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -Zeus- u| c 22:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Look at this guy. He is a fucking scumbag! John Asfukzenski ( talk) 16:55, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Listen to his phone calls [3] [4] John Asfukzenski ( talk) 21:19, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Joe Stack, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Stack. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Paranormal Skeptic ( talk) 20:30, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
There is a larger article on the overall climategate issue in incubation. This is an invitation for you to contribute. TMLutas ( talk) 17:08, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Squirrel fishing. FYI. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 18:53, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Climate change exaggeration, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Climate change exaggeration. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist ( talk) 02:03, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
You are dancing on the edge of your topic ban. I'm not going to call you on it, but eventually someone will, and you're at your fourth or fifth last chance. PhGustaf ( talk) 02:39, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Climate change delusion, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_070908/content/01125109.guest.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 20:01, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Grundle2600 violating his topic ban?. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 05:25, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first. The block is for violation of the topic ban enacted here. The edit in violation is here. - TexasAndroid ( talk)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This user was a participant in the 2nd Great Wikipedia Dramaout, improving articles from January 18–22, 2010. |
Please always free free to post friendly messages on my talk page, even during the dramaout.
For those of you who wish to file ANI complaints to get me blocked or banned, please wait until the dramaout is over. Thank you.
Grundle2600 ( talk) 03:47, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Mhmm, you seem to repeat Republican talking points there. Any personal ("self-made") thoughts about this from your side? Sorry, but I can't post over there as I don't subscribe to political forums, I just read them. Although you made it clear that you stand for what you think and write, if you'd prefer to keep such things rather private I'll promise to respond to your off-wiki posts by e-mail in the future (if I have an itch to say or ask you something). Best, The Magnificent Clean-keeper ( talk) 20:31, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Just a quick reminder that the Second Great Wikipedia Dramaout has begun. Please log any work you do at Wikipedia:The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/2nd/Log. Good luck! -- Jayron 32 01:56, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the picture, ChildofMidnight! Grundle2600 ( talk) 18:09, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
I predict Martha Coakley wins. I don't think Massachusetts is ready for real change. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 19:04, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Uh oh! What happened to Heart Kun's photo??? More censorship? Speaking of which, it's an interesting Supreme Court decision that came down. I think it's strange that individual political contributions are so limited (which has helped encourage all these shady PACs) while groups are allowed to spend unlimited amounts. I'm not sure I disagree with the decision, but it seems counter to the previous decision and McCain Feingold. The idea that you or I could't spend money making a political movie does seem undemocratic. I think campaign speech should be allowed in all cases as long as there is transparency. McCain really fouled that one up. And how about this John Edwards saga. And now he's in Haiti making even more children? Crazy. Two Americas indeed. I'll stick with mine and leave Al Gore, John Edwards, the Clintons, and all these wacko cultist bullies running around here to there's, thank you very much. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 00:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
That video could've been funny if it wouldn't be so extremely offensive. If you just would know and understand the original words (even so they are from a movie) you wouldn't have posted it. But as usual, you don't think about what you see and read; you just repeat. Shame on you? Not really, because you just don't know better and that's the pity and shame.-- The Magnificent Clean-keeper ( talk) 20:09, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
And BTW: Ron Paul didn't and sure never would endorse such crap. He's way much smarter than this (and probably would kick your ass to outher space just for posting such shit). The Magnificent Clean-keeper ( talk) 20:18, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Markus (prostitute) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —
Ecw.Technoid.Dweeb |
contributions |
talk |
☮✌☮ 21:04, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
I love the name you gave this file!! File:Tramp Stamp Barbie.jpg. Have you seen File:Oreo Fun Barbie.jpg? ROFL Dillard 421♂♂ ( talk to me) 03:08, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Chimpcam, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chimpcam. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 16:36, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
I hope you'll do DYKs for them. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 21:05, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Materialscientist ( talk) 18:01, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Please stop POV-pushing all over Wikipedia. It amazes me that you haven't been indefinitely blocked for your appalling behavior. -- Scjessey ( talk) 01:58, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Who else besides me is planning to watch Puppy Bowl VI on February 7? Grundle2600 ( talk) 02:48, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Grundle, McCartney clearly doesn’t say “fuck”, so what is the point here? A lot of pointless things have been published about the band over time, and surely we have to discriminate between what is relevant and what is just wrong? Stuff like this is distracting, and devalues the article, I think. Also, highlighting fuck just makes it look like you’re trying to be mischievous. I would like to remove it all. What do you say? -- Patthedog ( talk) 12:16, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
I think this is an interesting editorial [2]. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 17:53, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Your not a true libertarian. Don't you realize that it is communist to support universal healthcare? 199.8.158.121 ( talk) 20:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Murder of Jennifer Daugherty requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
-Zeus-
u|
c 22:29, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Murder of Jennifer Daugherty, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Jennifer Daugherty. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -Zeus- u| c 22:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Look at this guy. He is a fucking scumbag! John Asfukzenski ( talk) 16:55, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Listen to his phone calls [3] [4] John Asfukzenski ( talk) 21:19, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Joe Stack, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Stack. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Paranormal Skeptic ( talk) 20:30, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
There is a larger article on the overall climategate issue in incubation. This is an invitation for you to contribute. TMLutas ( talk) 17:08, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Squirrel fishing. FYI. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 18:53, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Climate change exaggeration, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Climate change exaggeration. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist ( talk) 02:03, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
You are dancing on the edge of your topic ban. I'm not going to call you on it, but eventually someone will, and you're at your fourth or fifth last chance. PhGustaf ( talk) 02:39, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Climate change delusion, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_070908/content/01125109.guest.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 20:01, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Grundle2600 violating his topic ban?. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 05:25, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first. The block is for violation of the topic ban enacted here. The edit in violation is here. - TexasAndroid ( talk)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |