~ Riana ⁂ 10:32, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Andrey, I am always amazed and delighted by the periodic DYKs that appear on my talk page, largely thanks to the work you do on the raw material I provide on the Humanities Desk. We make an ideal partnership, a little like Marx and Engels, or Laurel and Hardie! All the very best from Anastasia. Clio the Muse 22:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
-- Peta 23:58, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, for the nth time, for your nominations. Daniel 06:41, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Made some additions based on Brook and an article by Ehud Ya'ari. They both call the site "Khumar". Should we rename the article "Khumarinskoye gorodishche" or "Khumar", as Skhimar seems a rather obscure Georgian designation? -- Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 03:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- are both just dic defs. I've left pleas in a couple of places, & can chip in myself, but I'm sure you could make a great job of them. Any chance? Johnbod 19:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for the late reply. I have been very busy lately. I will address the issue when I have time (hopefully tonight). Hajji Piruz 23:59, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Howdy partner, liked your storm page Meteoguy 18:26, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your additions to the Trans-Caspian Railway article! However, I am asking that it be moved from Central Asian Railway back to its original article name. While 'Central Asian Railway' is a correct translation from the Russian name, it is rarely (if ever) used in English. I have checked all my English-language Central Asia books, and all mentions of the railway (from both historical-based and modern works) call it the Trans-Caspian. A Google search also verifies that this is the more common English name.
Ditto for the 'Tashkent Railway' article, which already exists as Trans-Aral Railway. I added all your info from the Tashkent Railway article to the Trans-Aral article, and then added a re-direct. I just wanted to let you know. Cheers! Otebig 18:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
-- Carabinieri 22:17, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
Image:Rozh.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
MER-C 09:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Hi Ghirla,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Rozh.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on December 23, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-12-23. howcheng { chat} 18:49, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
-- Allen3 talk 23:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Would anyone like to comment on this? -- Joopercoopers 11:03, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi Girlandajo! You wrote on the talk page of the article on Uspenski Cathedral in Helsinki that: "There is no explanantion why a church in Helsinki should occupy this generic title". There definitely is an explanation: Finland and Russia happen to have a common history 1809-1917. Kindly read my comment on this on the talk page of the article. By the way, your analysis about Wikipedia on your user page is thoughtprovoking! Cheers! -- Tellervo 11:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Ghirla, hi, I'm needing the help of a Wikipedia editor who actually knows something about the Mongols (in particular about their activities in the late 1200s). Preferably someone who actually has access to reliable sources, as opposed to someone who's just doing Google searches through pseudohistory websites. :/ Would you be a good person to help with this, or could you point me at someone else that might be able to help? Thanks, El on ka 19:47, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, do we need two articles on the same topic Battle of the Dardanelles (1807)? I notice you haved edited at them both. Chessy999 00:40, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, just to let you know that I protested against the by-passing of the nomination process here regarding the Kazanowski Palace. -- Camptown 20:47, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
---- Anonymous Dissident Talk 02:50, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi there. I saw your suggestions at the Reference Desk thread. Do you know of anyone (maybe you?) who would be able to draw up a more complete list of the most famous "battle" and "war" paintings that we should have articles on? commons:Category:Battle paintings might help. The list so far is:
Any more ideas? Carcharoth 08:04, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
-- Allen3 talk 10:52, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
Image:Alexander Litovchenko - Ivan the Terrible Showing Treasures to the English Ambassador Jerome Horsey.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Chris B •
talk •
contribs 14:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Hi Ghirla,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Alexander Litovchenko - Ivan the Terrible Showing Treasures to the English Ambassador Jerome Horsey.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on January 4, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-01-04. howcheng { chat} 00:41, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi Ghirlandajo! Thank you very much for the star! I do appreciate very much! Best regards PHG 15:16, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
-- Allen3 talk 15:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
I think the general idea is good (temperature information is encyclopedic and useful), but I, too, don't care much about this particular implementation. Peacock colors aside, the template is so wide (regardless of whether it is hidden by default) that it would more often than not clash with infoboxes and images. In Irkutsk in particular, there is no way to fix this situation unless the "Geography and climate" section is expanded (more than twice) or moved down (which isn't desirable either), or if the infobox is removed. I don't really know if there is a good solution.— Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • ( yo?); 16:01, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
-- Carabinieri 11:25, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
You never answered my question - why did you retask an article you've never edited before? -- Golbez 14:21, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Since medieval history is your cup of tea, could you please look at the edit war at Berehynia. I wrote this short article long ago and now Hillock seems eager to make a change supported by sources that seem dubious to me. Could you comment on how serious these sources appear to you or maybe you know of any other literature on the subject. TIA, -- Irpen 04:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Dear Ghirlandajo, I was simply trying to show you that your admin abuse allegations are baseless. You may not agree with admins, you may not agree with deletions an admin made, but that's no reason to be desysoped. In the same vein, if someone disagrees with your edit, that's no reason take your priveleges away. As for the RfC, are you aware that there need to be two other users who certify the dispute? I highly doubt that will happen because of one of my deletions. Maxim (talk) 12:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Glad you liked it! I'll have to think on the caption - I'm never good at those. Cheers Johnbod 13:21, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
I don't have a problem with your sig, it just seemed a bit hypocritical of you to complain of someone else using Cyrillic in their sig. I'm not sure what you mean about IRC. — Random832 23:45, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
I now think he misunderstood the link to "Moscou": [1]. That is a hamlet where I lived for some time. The place was NOT called that way in honour of "the French victory at Borodino" as many French tourists think. It was named after a detachment of Cossacks, who stayed there in 1815 waiting for a Cossack general to return from England. During the Hundred Days, Louis XVIII came to Ghent, and was put under their protection. Ghent tourist guides still mention the story of the French King sweating in his carriage, waiting for his Cossack guard to take him from his Hotel in the Veldstraat to the French consulate at St Anne's (both the Hotel Steenhuize and St. Anne's French consulate still exist). Louis XVIII, "Lowie die zwiet" (Louis who transpires) is still a nickname in Ghent for a, er, rather fat man. After Waterloo, the cossacks seem to have left for Paris, which they may have entered together with Tsar Alexander, but I cannot source that. I am sure, however, that there were no Russian soldiers at Waterloo, though the French may have thought otherwise: a small part of the Russo-German legion (by then incorporated into the Prussian army) reached Waterloo and was still wearing their green (Russian) uniforms. This photograph was once put on the internet to show how "Russian" the architecture of Moscou is. But that dom is actually in Ledeberg, the cottage houses on the left are in Moscou.
There is a "famous" tram service from the main Ghent station to where I used to live. I can assure you that there are some American tourists who think that the "Moscou" tram really drives all the way to Russia. The Dutch spelling of the capital of Russia is actually MosKou. In any case, since he uses the same "travels and life" set up, Martin should have seen in my travels that Russia was marked with weeks only. Before turning me into a Russian, he should have noticed that there was something funny there. -- Pan Gerwazy 10:27, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
-- Carabinieri 16:09, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Regardless of my zero knowledge of the history behind all these matters, I said that because why should administrators stoop down to that level to communicate their point? It really isn't necessary and in the future if someone with or without a history uses the board inappropriately, I would really be disappointed to see another response like that. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 16:31, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
This is not PD-Russia, this image is copyrighted. Alex Spade 07:13, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Ah, so it was слово as in Слово о плъку Игоревѣ. That makes sense. I knew there was little chance that Saint Gregory would have mentioned Slavic water sprites back in the 4th century. Cheers. -- Folantin 18:53, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks Ghirlandajo! I do appreciate! PHG 18:48, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
1. I'm in a dispute here (by the way, your own input there would be appreciated) where Dojarca claims that Rodina-Mat' referred to the USSR and not Russia. However, was there not a revived Great Russian nationalism during the Great Patriotic War, with even the Church brought back to life? I suppose an article on the concept would be illuminating, but until then, I'll see what you may have to say.
2. I know ий can be transliterated either -iy or -y, but when, if ever, is one preferred over the other? See point 2 here for why I ask, and why I think -y should be used in that case.
3. I note we lack an article on the Domostroi - is that something which you would be interested in writing at some point?
Thank you for your help. Biruitorul 23:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Ghirla, I suspect that Professor Vize has been made up by a determined hoaxer whom I've caught at Talk:Huvadhu_Atoll, while following up leads on a hoaxer I uncovered at Bourges. What do you think of "Professor Vize" with all his legitimnate links?-- Wetman 02:15, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Ghirla, I know you have your hands full all the time but if you have a minute, please consider taking a look at the Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/House of Gediminas and improving it if needed. I know of no better expert in the princely genealogy than yourself. -- Irpen 03:34, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi Ghirla, please do not hesitate to drop by on the Talk:Franco-Mongol alliance page, as there is some dispute as the extent and nature of the alliance. Your expertise would be welcome. Best regards. PHG 07:27, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Ghirla. I hadn't spotted the use of Template:WPRDAC before, it's a great idea. Xn4 18:35, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
can we discuss this amicably? I realize there is a history to this, and I don't want to trample over things, but the pages have issues. Most conspicuously, the sheer scope overlap of Etymology of Rus and Rus' (people). I don't want to push this unduly, there is no deadline, but some cleanup is definitely in order. regards, dab (𒁳) 21:23, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi Ghirla,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Maslenitsa kustodiev.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on October 6, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-10-06. howcheng { chat} 23:35, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Regarding Vladimir Wiese, is there a reason why you chose the German spelling "Wiese" instead of "Vize"? I have noticed that, except for the works that he wrote in German, he is most of the times (like for example in the bibliographies that appear in W. Barr's books), referred to as Professor "V. Yu. Vize". Mohonu 03:41, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Do we have an article on dom tvorchestva? I'm curious of its translation if exists. -- Brand спойт 10:07, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you Ghirlandajo for your authoritative support. I do appreciate very much. Best regards. PHG 19:38, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Ghirla, hi, I have to admit that I'm very confused about something you said about me. Would it be alright if we talked about it for a moment? My impression of you is that you're a prolific editor, who cares deeply about Wikipedia. I've read your userpage, and I agree with much of what you say! To my knowledge, we've never actually worked together on an article, though if I'm misremembering something, please let me know.
A couple times now, I've seen you refer to me as someone who "has to be proven right." Each time you've said this, I have been perplexed as to how you got this impression. Indeed, I feel that I am often criticized for the opposite, for being too quick to compromise! So, if you don't mind, could we clear the air a bit? Could you be more specific as to what you think that I have done, which has given you this negative impression of me? I definitely see you as someone that I would like to have as an ally, and not as an enemy. If you could please let me know what I might be able to do, to help us put any disagreements behind us, I would be very appreciative. Thanks, El on ka 17:34, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
I have sent an email to a flickr user to see if we can use his photo. If that doesn't work, [7] are some other choices we have. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 06:46, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Sometime this summer (back in June), you made an edit suggesting that you would support reverting the article on the Russian Orthodox Church back to a 2006 version. I left a message on the Talk Page asking why but you never responded. Perhaps you never saw my message. In any event, would you mind reviewing the article and sharing with me your thoughts as to whether the quality of the article is degraded from 2006 and whether you still support reverting or if you think it can be fixed? Thanks. -- Richard 09:02, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Ghirlandajo, I am still in the old dispute over the House of Munsö with user:Pieter Kuiper. He wants to remove stuff, while I want to keep in things that I find interesting. Please, join the discussion and give your opinion.-- Berig 16:07, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Many thanks for my newcomer award, much appreciated. Glad to see you've developed Nikolai Yevreinov too; I'd like to get around to more of the theatre people in Russia in that period. One thing, though: why the move to that spelling? I know the Russian names into English isn't straightforward, so I was wondering what your thinking was? DionysosProteus 22:23, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
I enjoyed your article on the Demidovs. I was reading about Karl von Hügel selling off his famous garden in 1848: most of the plants were sold to Anatole Demidov. I had no idea who this man was, and didn't expect there to be an article on him. Lo and behold, he is so famous as to have a chicken dish named after him! Hesperian 12:24, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Greetings,
Unproven claims to age 110+ should be categorized as category: longevity claims. A category, category: Russian supercentenarians should only be used IF a case is based on proven/documented records that have been accepted by an established world authority, such as Guinness World Records or the Gerontology Research Group. Also, religious ideas about longevity, even if cited in newspapers, should not be presented as 'fact'. Claims that those in the Caucasian live longer have been debunked for 30+ years. No case has ever proven true.
If you would like to be pro-active, however, we would like to find out whatever happened to Maria Strelnikova. Note that since she came from extreme northwest Russia, where records kept were generally better, I do wonder if there are any documents to prove her age (or if/when she died).
Please discuss.
Sincerely Robert Young Ryoung122 00:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,908667-1,00.html
The debunking of the Izumi case from Japan, likewise, came from the Japanese themselves (Suzuki et al). Thus what we have is not nationalism but 'science vs. mythology'. Myths are not just something that existed in the past; many people still believe them. The issue is whether we should continue the cycle of mis-information or finally live up to a standard of proof.
Note that the USA also had its own myths at the time, see Charlie Smith (centenarian) for more.
Finally, I left another note under 'Summer 2007' by accident instead of here.
Sincerely, Robert Young
Ryoung122 04:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Ghirla, could you kindly check the Russian names in the Finnish_Orthodox_Church#Russian_Orthodox_Church_in_Finland, thanks. -- Drieakko 06:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Your objections are duly noted. The decision is, admittedly, a work in progress; if you believe that I've missed noting any of the habitualy incivil parties, please feel free to name them (and present the requisite evidence, obviously).
But I'm not sure if you realize that the ruling in the Piotrus case was intended as a final warning, not as mere idle chatter. The community of editors working on EE topics was told that their normal style of interaction was unacceptable. They have failed to improve it. And thus it has become necessary to use less gentle methods in order to bring this continual infighting to an end. Kirill 11:14, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
You wrote on the discussion page of Sergius of Valaam, that there is text about this possible founder of Valaam monastery in the internet. Yes, but in Kyrillic text! Would you kindly translate some portions of it to us who don't know Russian? -- Tellervo 17:09, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your edit in Ogygia, regarding original research. I have removed the tagged text and replaced it. You might like to check and comment on it. Odysses (☜) 10:09, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
During the FAC of Victoria Cross for Australia the validity of the copyright tag on Image:Malakhov2.jpg has been questioned. The author of the work died in 1928 and as such does not meet the requirements for +100 years. Could it be changed or updated? Although i have removed from the VC for OZ page, it would still be good to clear it up. Thanks. Woodym555 16:49, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
The 25 DYK Medal | ||
I noticed you didn't have the 25 DYK medal, so for a laugh I thought I'd give it you. Seriously though, you're a great wikipedian; it should be mandatory to look up to you. :) Cheers, Spawn Man 04:34, 11 October 2007 (UTC) |
Dear Ghirla. Thanks for your help and advice. I took your advice and have been sticking to content to see how it goes; it's worked, and I've decided finally not to leave wiki ... at least not for a while. Let me know if I can ever help you with anything. Best regards, Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk) 16:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Ciao, and sorry for the late answer, but I was (and, actually, I am still ;-)) on holidays. Of course I know this church! I visited it last spring, and I started to write an article about it in september. It should be ready by the end of October. I hope that it will appear on DYK, since the story of this small church is quite interesting. Cheers, Alex2006 13:46, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Ready to swab the decks! | ||
Another motley scallawag has joined the crew. Thanks for your comments at my RFA. Arrrgh! - - Jehochman Talk 05:18, 12 October 2007 (UTC) |
Sorry that I'm a bit late (due to the Toolserver replication lag), but I'm happy to congratulate you on this milestone. Good luck in further contributions! :) — Kalan ? 15:57, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Ghirlandajo. If you could give a source for this image on commons; someone transfered it to commons, but it still doesn't have a source. It would be appreciated. Thanks. 64.178.96.168 17:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
I saw your comment on Talk:Loire Valley about Vandalism. I have just reverted some Vandalism there and I will be putting a link to this article on my User Page to monitor it. Kathleen.wright5 13:00, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Посмотри фотографию, пожалуйста. Я так понимаю, ты её в ен-вики грузил. Может что скажешь? Представленного разрешения явно недостаточно. ~ kintup 21:02, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. Among the principles passed was At wit's end which states that necessary measures must be adopted by the Arbitration Committee in cases where repeated attempts to stop disruptive disputes have failed. As a result of the case, both Digwuren and Petri Krohn are banned for one year. There has also been a general restriction to all editors working on topis related to Eastern Europe and a warning to all those who may, in the future, attempt to use Wikipedia as a battleground that they may be banned when the matter is reported to the Committee. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Cbrown1023 talk 22:22, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Andrej, you split this off Medici, but I wonder whether such a "Florentine" calendar existed. Were you too trusting? I noted my doubts at Talk:Florentine calendar. What do you think, looking at the article again? -- Wetman 08:01, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:EltonJohnElectricitySingleCover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at
Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the
media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:40, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Andrey, would you look at my start on this interesting gent and correct any gaffes I've committed? There's surely a Russian wiki, yes?. -- Wetman 17:49, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey, Ghirla! A Swedish revisionist tries portray the Battle of Lesnaya (which the majority of sources calls a crushing defeat of the Swedes) as a draw. Some other moron has frozen the article. Could you please help in the discussion? Thank you. Voyevoda 22:35, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Здравствуйте. Проверьте, пожалуйста, почту. ru.Media 16:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Russia is currently a featured article candidate. Please feel free to leave comments here.-- Miyokan 11:54, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello Mr Ghirlandajo, can you take a look at this article which i translated yesterday from the German Wikipedia? I tried to change its name to Rumyantsev Museum and than i found out the name is already in use. Can you integrage this two, improve mine or change the redirect to your article? What would be the best? Taksen 09:03, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I'm gathering material together to create a little article on the Maly Theatre, Moscow, and I'm a little confused, so I wondered whether you might have a little time to help me clear something up? I don't speak/read Russian, which is probably where I'm going wrong. My draft scribblings are here.
I'm confused about when the theatre was created. I realise there was a company first, then the building came later. But when was the company set up?
The babel-fish translation of the Maly's own history page on their website seems to imply it was the Imperial decree in 1756 that founded the company, along with Moscow Uni (although the Wikipedia article for the uni says 1755, so that's odd), as does a Russian news-page saying they're celebrating 250yr anniversary. However, all the sources in books in English that I can find - Cambridge Guide to Theatre, Oxford Companion to Theatre say it was founded in 1805 or 1806. The new page about celebrating anniversary says it's the oldest professional theatre in Russia, but the actors were students at the Uni, which suggests amateur. Brockett's History of Theatre says 1805 when the crown purchased 74 serf actors; so I don't get how the students and serfs could be one company. I realise that all the theatres came under control of the government then, but it's a bit unclear how this worked. Then they got a building in 1824 (on this, the sources agree). From then on, it becomes first the House of Shchepkin then the House of Ostrovsky, and the sources settle down and start to agree with one another.
I'm leaving this note on Miyokan's page too. If you have time to look at it for me, I'd be grateful. The web sources in Russian are here:
Many thanks, DionysosProteus 14:05, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you uploaded the 19th century picture of the Kazan Cathedral. I'm wondering if you perhaps know the source of it; I would like to be able to cite the original source. Can you please reply to my discussion page?
Thanks much, Sir Pimpernel 02:03, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, can you please shed some light on the relation between the two and if indeed it was the same person? Thanks
StevanMD 13:40, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Volotsk.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Remember the dot ( talk) 02:48, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
As you have shown interest for Central Asian topics, for your information, the FA article on the Indo-Greek kingdom is under FA review. You may leave comments and vote at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Indo-Greek Kingdom. PHG ( talk) 18:24, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Can you think of anything to add here - we don't have very good coverage! Johnbod ( talk) 23:56, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Where's the source for this? As I understand, photos of sculptures are not necessarily in the public-domain by default. -- VegitaU ( talk) 01:09, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Гирландайо, несравненный %) вы не включите её в свой список наблюдения? А то там часто по-мелкому правят анонимы, а я, во-первых, не очень часто сюда заглядываю, а во-вторых, не настолько владею языком, чтобы оценить стилистические тонкости в акцентах, которые смещаются пристрастными товарищами. -- Shakko kitsune 12:14, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Halo I write article Sveneld in Polish wiki. I have question: from where (title article or book) originate, Gumilev theory about Sveneld?-- Polelum 15:27, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:Apollo&daphne.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the
media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.
VegitaU (
talk) 00:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Apollo&daphne.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following
this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a
non-free license (per
Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted
48 hours after 00:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
VegitaU (
talk) 00:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Dear Ghirla, we miss you here! Your vast diamond-quality contributions, your principled stand against various cranks and cooks, you felicitous remarks at various boards helped in forming the Wikipedia what it has become. I understand that you left due to stress and you would have been back if you were over it. So, I am not trying to rush you. Please take all the time you need to forget the stressful part but do come back when you are ready. Hope this will happen sooner... -- Irpen 03:45, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello Ghirla,
I just came across your 28-Feb-2006 comment on the Knyaz talk page, where you state that "There are no Slavic loans from Celtic, as best I know."
There are commonalities, but I don't know that I would refer to it as borrowing from one people to another. Consider, for example, the Gaelic name "MacGowan". The first syllable in the Gaelic "Mac" changes (called a mutatation), depending on its location in a sentence, and so is often spelled Mhic (the vowel becomes short, and the M mutates to a V), and it is pronounced Vic. Slavs put this at the end of a name, and Gaels put it before the name, but it is the same word, which you certainly recognize. Now, if you recognize Gowan as Kowal, then the name makes sense.
Regards, 24.178.228.14 ( talk) 18:01, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your very kind note on my Talk: page, it is much appreciated. Jayjg (talk) 03:12, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello! Could You move Daumantas of Pskov to Dovmont. I saw You were arguing for this move. I agree with You. 81.7.98.250 ( talk) 06:47, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Dear Ghirla,
I saw that you worked on the Uzbek people article. User:E104421 who is known for his Pan-Turkist bias and who is on a 1RR parole because of his edits in various Turkey- and Turks-related article has recently vandalized the Uzbek people article, deleting at least 5 academic sources: [8]
I have reverted his recent vandalism, but someone else with more experience should watch the article. The mentioned user is also deleting academic sources from other articles whenever he feels that those sources are against his nationalist views: [9].
Thank you for your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.83.159.59 ( talk) 23:59, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Poklonka.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Remember the dot ( talk) 18:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
I made changes, now refering from Mons family:
I started articles in German Wikipedia.
Yours sincerely, Simplicius ( talk) 21:27, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
I'm currently copyediting vampire, which includes quite a few sources in Russian and other slavic languages. Would you be so kind as to review my reference formatting to make sure I didn't do any major mess? Circeus ( talk) 21:04, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Phiale.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 14:44, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Scythian resurrection.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 14:57, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Vladimir by klodt.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at
Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the
media copyright questions page. Thank you. —
Remember the dot (
talk) 01:52, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered,
Image:Vladimir by klodt.jpg, has been listed at
Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the
image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at
the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —
Remember the dot (
talk) 06:34, 23 December 2007 (UTC) --—
Remember the dot (
talk) 06:34, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
And s nastupayushchim from me! -- Paul Pieniezny ( talk) 21:44, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Siysky.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Remember the dot ( talk) 03:15, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Toliatti.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Remember the dot ( talk) 05:43, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Ghirla, Happy Christmas & New Year! If you are still doing new stuff here, we could really use a short article on the precious metal icon-cover - I can't even remember the proper name for them. All the best. Johnbod ( talk) 20:23, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Kizhi old.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 20:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Nevsky.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at
Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the
media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (
talk) 21:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Obraztsov.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Rettetast (
talk) 14:00, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Severyn Nalivaiko.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 08:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Eskov.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BorgQueen ( talk) 07:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Ghirla! Your opinion would be highly appreciated at some of the current discussions at Talk:Franco-Mongol alliance. Best regards. PHG ( talk) 08:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Eskov.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 10:34, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Tana cornaro.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 08:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mchekhov.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:44, 28 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Remember the dot ( talk) 04:44, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Yarplan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 03:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ivanvasil.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 22:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ivanvasil2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 22:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Ghirlandajo. I am again being attacked by Elonka and some of her supporters at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Franco-Mongol alliance/Workshop. Could you kindly give your opinion? Thank you. PHG ( talk) 17:16, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:User no IRC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 21:38, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Ballada2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at
Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our
criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the
media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (
talk) 05:47, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Ghirla, I noticed you were the uploader of Image:Vasnetsov samolet.jpg. The textile arts project is running a featured portal drive and I've been doing a lot of image restorations. You've uploaded tons of images; if something else of yours relates to textiles and might become feature-worthy with a restoration, please drop me a link. Must be at least 1000px on a side and have good focus without .jpg artifacting. I can take care of dust and scratches. Cheers, Durova Charge! 20:19, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Ghirla:
Lately there have been a lot of problems in the Soviet Intervention in Afghanistan article. Two users, Raoulduke47 and Scythian1, are making all sorts of misbalanced, confused statements in the article. They are turning it into a farce.
I think my most recent edits (check the history) are the most objective way of handling the article, but these other two posters are blanking my edits and turing the article into a flame war.
They are claiming that the Soviet Union collapsed because of a "military defeat" in Afghanistan, and that the war had a "profound" and traumatic impact on the USSR.
They are citing an article published in 1999 to support their views. The views of the article's authors are isolated, and are regarded as farfetched by almost all other authorities on the subject.
From the way Raoulduke47 and Scythian1 write the article, you'd think they were talking about the impact of WW1/Brest-Litovsk or the 1241 Mongol invasion. They don't understand that the Afghan intervention was desultory skirmishing...just a sideshow to what was really happening in the USSR and the world at the time.
Isn't there any way the misblanced views of these contributors can be controlled?
Kenmore ( talk) 20:30, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
I have already explained why: 1) your sources are inadequate, and 2) why the sources should not form the cornerstone of the article’s perspective. Harvard historian Richard Pipes is regarded as the world’s leading Soviet/Russian scholar, and his views are far different than those of Reuveny and Prakash (whom you cite). So why brush aside Pipes in favor of Reuveny and Prakash? Ditto for Mark Urban. Urban’s book “War and Afghanistan” is widely regarded as one of the best and most reliable accounts of the Soviet-Afghan situation, and Urban’s conclusions are far different than those of your “sources”. So why ignore Urban? I could list dozens of other leading scholars to support my claim as well.
Reuveny and Prakash’s article is not very good. I knew a student at Johns Hopkins and when I asked him about the article, he laughed and called its argument “far fetched.” Reuveny and Prakash’s article is simply not a respected scholarly work on this subject and it should not be used as the basis of a Wikipedia account of the Soviet-Afghan epoch.
The other “sources” you cite – Viorst, Hilali, and Daugherty – consist of just isolated remarks in books that do not directly concern what happened on the ground in Afghanistan or in Soviet society following the war. Those books concern subjects that are tangential to the Soviet-Afghan conflict. To use these “sources” to set the tone and flow of the article is irresponsible.
My perspective is not pro Russian/Soviet either. I am merely trying to establish the truth about the Soviet-Afghan epoch. Richard Pipes, after all, is known for being vehemently anti-Soviet and he’s not especially sympathetic to post-USSR Russia, either. Yet even Pipes does not make the ridiculous, far fetched claims that Reuveny and Prakash do.
There was no Soviet military defeat in Afghanistan (read Urban). There war had no “profound” effect on Soviet society (read Pipes). Your sources – and the irresponsible claims you make based on those sources – need to go. Kenmore ( talk) 01:33, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
File:David,larry.JPG | My RFA | |
Thank you muchly for your support in
my recent request for adminship, which was successfully closed on 76%, finishing at 73 supports, 23 opposes and 1 neutral. The supports were wonderful, and I will keep in mind the points made in the useful opposes and try to suppress the Larry David in me! Now I'm off to issue some cool down blocks, just to get my money's worth!
Kidding btw. Hope you decide to come back here properly in the not too distant future. Really! All the best, Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk) 11:46, 5 March 2008 (UTC) |
Ghirla:
Could you take down or delete the "Battle of Krasnoi Peer Review" page you created in 2006? Very few people contributed to it, and right now it's just litter visible to anyone who does a "Krasnoi" google search. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/Battle_of_Krasnoi
I still intend to improve the Battle of Krasnoi and Battle of Vyazma articles in the future, by the way. They will definitely reach "A" status before long.
Thanks. Kenmore ( talk) 12:55, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Ghirla! Would you be interesting in providing a comment on this? Thanks!— Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • ( yo?); 13:26, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Zdorovo. I am stopping by to let you know that Template:Peacockterm has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — -- Y not be working? 23:49, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Ghirla, here's hoping this is up your alley. Found a beautiful image file on Commons in a clear high resolution version that might be featured picture material, but the voters will want more background than the uploader provided. Would you or one of the other Russian editors be able to help out? And perhaps conominate? Best regards, Durova Charge! 19:59, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
I suppose you may not want to answer this until your own Easter, but still felt like wishing you the best on this day. Feel free to delete this or transfer it to a later header on your own Easter, by the way.-- Paul Pieniezny ( talk) 18:01, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Indeed, Христос Воскресе! From your "confrontational" friend Biruitorul ( talk) 02:01, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Happy Easter, Ghirla! Hope to see you back here when the time is right for you. -- Irpen 08:12, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Can you keep an eye on this, my Russian history can be a little vague and awry at times. Thanks Giano ( talk) 11:13, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Lubyanka 1916.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 12:26, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Кириллов.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of
fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets
Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.
The following images also have this problem:
This is an automated notice by
FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see
Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
It would be immensely helpful to the project, and me, if you made a brief return to proper editing and wrote Elizabethan Baroque. You are the best one to do it, and I trust your edits as much as any reference book, probably more than one or two I can think of - what do you say? Giano ( talk) 17:44, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
I was in Russia in the fall of 2006 and took thousands of pictures. Some are in your area and I saw your picture of Sergiyev Posad. I was there also and would appreciate it if you can help identify some of the images I took. -- Ted-m ( talk) 02:01, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Would you mind improving the arcticle I did on Zhivoy (film)? The article Ru:Живой (фильм) is a bit larger.-- Ted-m ( talk) 02:46, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
I have been told you are an authority on Russian history.Hopefully, you will be able to help me out.I edited an article on Philippa of Hainault,whose maternal ancestry can be traced back to Elizabeth of Bosnia,who was the daughter of Kuthen,Khan of the Cumens and his Russian wife,a de Halicz/Galicie who is said to have been the daughter of Mstislav,Prince de Halicz (1175-1228)but the article on Mstislav in Wikipedia seems to indicate that she may have been his granddaughter.We need to link her to someone because many people are wondering who exactly she was and her precise relationship to Mstislav.Thank you very much. jeanne ( talk) 14:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Allatarasova.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following
this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a
non-free license (per
Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted
48 hours after 08:08, 18 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to
opt out of receiving this notice?
Kelly
hi! 08:08, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered,
Image:Annenkov.jpg, has been listed at
Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the
image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at
the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
Kelly
hi! 07:18, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Asmenshikov.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following
this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a
non-free license (per
Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted
48 hours after 15:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to
opt out of receiving this notice?
Kelly
hi! 15:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Athanasefet.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 15:22, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed you made a few edits to this a while ago. The template has changed recently, in a way I think is detrimental. If you have any opinions on what it's content or form should be, some input from you may be useful. Thanks Ha! ( talk) 17:38, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Could I ask you to make a pass through Channel One (Russia)? I did my best to clean up the citations, but my Russian is really minimal (it might be maybe my 10th-best language; I don't usually even count it); I made some use of Google Translate to try to understand some of the footnotes (though I didn't always follow it literally) and I did my best to cut some that really obviously did not meet our "reliable sources" criteria; I have my doubts about some of the ones that remain. Anyway, I think it could use some attention from a native Russian speaker who is also a good Wikipedian, hence my request to you. - Jmabel | Talk 23:35, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
In case you'll be concerned that I've gone from the Russian wiki, please, don't worry. I'll continue editing here. Maybe after a break, but I shall. Cmapm ( talk) 22:43, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Good morning Ghirla! You are very welcome, but thanks for what? Ciao, Alex2006 ( talk) 09:58, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Gauguin arles.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? BlueAzure ( talk) 05:39, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
May I alert you to a discussion on merging Ondine (Sir Frederick Ashton ballet) into Ondine (Henze)! — Robert Greer ( talk) 18:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, noticed you are the primary contributor in the article. Can you please use some inline citation in this article? Thanks. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 07:57, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
She is known in the West as Lydia Masterkova. See [13]. WWGB ( talk) 10:54, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Voinaimir.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.
BJBot (
talk) 12:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your support at my recent Request for adminship. I hope you find I live up to your expectations. Best, Risker ( talk) 16:13, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Abramstevo.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 14:04, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Althorv.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 00:39, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Antikiller.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 05:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Arkaim.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 07:52, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Arqaim.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 08:29, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Batalov.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's
criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to
the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at
Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page.
STBotI (
talk) 22:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bayanova.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 23:12, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Benoisoldiers.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's
criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to
the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at
Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page.
STBotI (
talk) 02:12, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Biblioteka.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's
criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to
the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at
Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page.
STBotI (
talk) 04:10, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Bondarchuk.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's
criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to
the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at
Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page.
STBotI (
talk) 10:47, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
For those of us unfamiliar with this, could you enlighten? Balloonman ( talk) 06:30, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Peresvet.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Hallo, it is nice to meet you again. Now I have another question. Every biblical manuscript has a symbol number according classification Gregory-Aland. I do not know what is symbol number for the Tribezond Gospel. There is List of New Testament minuscules, and I want to include the Trebizond Gospel to this list. You wrote an article ru:Фингалова пещера, I wrote pl:Grota Fingala, and also the monasteries of Athos, and the biblical manuscripts. Nice work. We have the same interests. By the way, can you correct ru:Список унциальных рукописей Нового Завета. We need articles: ru:Послания Павла, ru:Соборные послания. I can do that, but not quickly. Досвидания. Leszek Jańczuk ( talk) 11:10, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey Andrey. Long time no talk. I've been working recently on the Mordvins and Volga Finns articles. The Mordvins article was moved last November to Volgaic Finns. However, I reverted the move yesterday after discussing it with Untifler at User talk:Untifler#Question. The problem is that some of the surrounding articles are still quite a mess. For example, Moksha people is totally unsourced and doesn't even mention the Mordvins at all. Same with Erzya people. I think these articles need to be fixed up, but I also think that the underlying problem is that these articles are not clear at all on whether the Moksha and Erzya are supgroups of the Mordvins, or distinct ethnic groups in their own right. Do you know the history behind the term "Mordvin"? Perhaps you could help me clarify it in these articles. Also, the article about Tyushtya is totally unsourced and largely confusing. Maybe you could assist me in this page as well. Finally, Volga Finns needs to be expanded. If the info from ru:Волжские финны is reliable, neutral, and sourced, I guess someone could translate at least part of it into English. Please let me know if you're too busy, but thanks in advance. Khoi khoi 21:21, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Any updates? Just curious. Khoi khoi 22:11, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey,
Do you have a source (perhaps in Russian?) that she made it to 100 years old so that we can re-add her with a proper reference to the List of centenarians? I checked, but I couldn't find one (and I don't read Russian), so I was wondering if you had or knew of one. Cheers, CP 20:32, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello Ghirla, I was wondering where Nabokov wrote about Sergei Ozhegov [15] because I would like to read it. Could you please cite it in the article. Thanks in advance. Regards, dvdrw 01:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, some years ago you added "Parts of the Orkhon Valley Cultural Landscape are situated in this province." to the Orkhon Province article. Was this just a guess, or do you happen to have some source for the claim? Most of the significant parts of this world heritage site seem to be situated much further south. Regards, Yaan ( talk) 22:53, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Ghirla! Could you, please, explain, what in the world crossed your way in the Petrozavodsk article? Looking at the edits which allegedly "have no merit whatsoever", I actually see a mix of edits, some of which indeed have no such merit, some are fairly useful, some are mostly technical, and some are not very important but do no harm nevertheless. If you want to clean up the article, why not just clean up the truly problematic parts, whatever they are, instead of reverting to some random edit from the past? And what's up with the infobox? I don't know if I should be surprised that one day you hate the whole infobox concept, the other day you love them, and the following day you are back to hating them again, but this particular one happens to be quite complete and well-developed. You should know very well that if you take this infobox out, some poor well-intentioned soul will add it back weeks or months later, except that it will be one part empty and the other part filled with stuff that's laughably inaccurate. You and me might not be around at the time to fix it. What good will that do?
Anyway, I restored the article in its most recent condition. If there are some urgent problems I am just not seeing but which you don't have time to fix yourself, please post a list of them on the article's talk page. I'll try to have them fixed without such drastic measures as whole-sale reversals.
Nice to see you back, by the way. Cheers,— Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • ( yo?); 01:46, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, Ghirla, for confirming my Language Ref Desk query today. I'm gaining more confidence with reading and typing Cyrillic but remain at the level of individual letters, relatively few words, and zero grammar. As my in-house Russophone colleagues haven't much English, I prefer checking these subtle texts here. Your contribution is appreciated! -- Cheers, Deborahjay ( talk) 17:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Good morning Ghirla! I wrote another article about a church in Constantinople. Ciao, Alex2006 ( talk) 05:46, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Per ruling of the arbcom here: Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Orangemarlin#Arbitrator_views_and_discussion an RFAR on Orangemarlin has been opend here: Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#User:Orangemarlin. You are invited to submit your evidence and statements.. — Rlevse • Talk • 16:53, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Ghirla, Hello! I have been looking at the article Economy of Russia for some time now, and feel like it could use some major improvements. This actually motivated me to register: however, I’m new around here and don’t want to do anything too major without the guidance and support of a wikipedia veteran. You seem to be the only person on Economy of Russia’s talk page Talk:Economy of Russia who is currently active, so I decided to send you a message. Apart from putting in citations/citations needed tags, checking for accuracy of numbers, etc. some major things I’d like to do (or see happen) are 1.moving a large amount of the information into an Economic history of Russia page, and adding a lot of missing information about what has happened in the past 2-3 years. So, I have two questions for you. First, do you have any advice for me before I start doing anything drastic? Also, if I created a list of possible changes to Economy of Russia (since there are so many changes that need to be done) would I post that on the talk page, or would it belong somewhere else? Thanks, Dettoaltrimenti ( talk) 09:22, 1 July 2008 (UTC) P.S. I hope I posted this right on your talk page... sorry if I didn't.
Thanks for uploading Image:8thdukecroy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following
this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a
non-free license (per
Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted
48 hours after 06:50, 3 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
O
sama
K 06:50, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Could you please move Königsberg Schlossteich to current name? I see there is a Russian interwiki, but can't read azbuka properly. Thanks. - Darwinek ( talk) 09:58, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi Ghirla !
I've tried to translate your interesting article about Suyab. What do you think about the translation? If there is anything false, feel free to correct the mistakes. Thanks. Necrid Master ( talk) 20:09, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello Ghirla:
I believe you created the Battle of Krasnoi peer review page in 2006. Can you explain to me what I have to do to delete it completely? I do not want people to find it when they do a "krasnoi" google search. Please advise. Thank you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/Battle_of_Krasnoi
Kenmore ( talk) 03:21, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Hey Ghirla, what is this aggression and rudeness actually about? I certainly don't "own" Fish farming. You say the article is in a "sorry state". Please explain what you mean. As far as the template you refer to, there are another sixty of those templates relating to fishing and fisheries. Each one has a lead menu item which goes to the lead article for that template. The lead article and the template share the same image. This works across 900 articles in the fishing and fisheries project, and no-one has ever complained before. -- Geronimo20 ( talk) 06:10, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Good Morning Ghirla! I wrote a small article about the Church of St. Mary of Blachernae, and I have a question for you about the Icon of the Blachernitissa. In the related article it is written that the Icon escaped the distruction of the church and was brought first to the Athos and then to Russia. Now, none of my sources mentions this fact, but they say that all the relics burned in the fire which destroyed the church. According to your knowledge, is this translation of the Icon documented, or is only a legend? Many thanks, Cheers, Alex2006 ( talk) 07:19, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Aleksey_Arakcheyev.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. O sama K 13:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Молодец! Отлично! The words in the subject/headline and in the first lines of this paragraph are what my instructors have been writing on my homework, and so I write them to you for your excellent work here, and on ru:. I hope you don't mind that I nominated Ivan Pyryev for DYK after expanding it a little myself. Feel free to improve or rewrite the hook. [16] Regards, dvdrw 02:20, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent work on the above article. It looks alot better now and I'm definitely not as confused as I was before. Jasynnash2 ( talk) 08:37, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
-- JayHenry ( talk) 05:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Rudget ( logs) 11:30, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Rudget ( logs) 11:34, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi Ghirla, someone came to me with a question about a really famous photograph and whether it remains in the public domain under the new Russian copyright law: Image:The Commissar Vanishes 2.jpg. We can't find the photographer's name Googling English language sources. It looks like we'll need the photographer's name and date of death to determine whether this is still public domain. Otherwise, unfortunately, it needs to be deleted from Commons and reloaded locally to en:wiki with restricted placement per fair use guidelines. Could you assist with this research? I'd really like to keep this on Commons if we can. Best wishes, Durova Charge! 05:57, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
I just noticed that your excellent photo of this Russian scholar/professor needs some updating: Image:Golenishchev.jpg Perhaps, you or Rudget knows the correct tag for it? Regards, Leoboudv ( talk) 04:58, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:Elizaveta_vorontsova.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the
media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.
O
sama
K 11:26, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
--Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 18:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Dear Ghirla, please accept my belated but sincere thanks for your input on this perennial question. I once went as far as consulting the Slavic languages staff at the U.S. Library of Congress for advice on romanization of Cyrillic titles, but I think proper names are in a class by themselves and the jury's still out. I'll keep you in mind for future consultations, if you'd be so kind. -- Cheers, Deborahjay ( talk) 13:02, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
You may be interested in this. Martintg ( talk) 06:31, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Where did you get that his real name is Пугонькин? --Yuriy Lapitskiy ~ 16:36, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Piotrus 2/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Piotrus 2/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, — Coren (talk) 22:02, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Ghirla, how nice to again see your dauntless posts here and there around the site. About those imagebot posts that you don't care about... User:Tex explained to me that the {{nobots}} template doesn't work very well. But putting {{bots|deny=all}} on the page would probably keep the bots away. It seems to be working for me. Best, Bishonen | talk 21:08, 31 August 2008 (UTC).
Ghirla, hi, we're currently working on the essay Wikipedia:Tag team. Since you have a fair bit of experience in dealing with these groups, I would like to invite you to come and participate in the writing of the essay. If you're not interested, no problem, but I did want to make sure you were invited. :) -- El on ka 16:13, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading
Image:Zerkalo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by
Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from
Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an
image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our
criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Sfan00 IMG (
talk) 12:14, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Greetings, Ghirla, and thanks for your input on the discussion. I'm inviting you to look at what I added (in case you're not following the page). And colleagues express concern and wonder, "Why do you spend so much time on Wikipedia?"... much as I wonder, why do I spend relatively more time patrolling the Ref Desks rather than working on mainspace articles? Answer: because I do believe people read it, besides the Original Posters of queries (including the trollish sort), and there may be a way to get through to them. But it can get quite exhausting, y'know! As is living in a conflicted world. -- Cheers, Deborahjay ( talk) 20:52, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Hey Ghirla, we haven't really bumped into each other in the past, and I have read various discussions which you have had with others, and can understand your reasons for all but giving up on en:wiki, but the question is what do we have to do to get back here, and I mean back here with a "vengeance" (so to speak). I have started a proposal at WP:RUSSIA to merge several projects into one main WP:RUSSIA project, and hopefully start laying the groundwork for getting WP:RUSSIA where it should be as a project. But, it is going to require people with sense, people with experience, etc, and I am hoping that you may be able to take a look at the proposal, and comment on it as necessary -- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Russia/Proposal -- one of the main things that we at en:wiki need to do is to obtain more able editors from ru:wiki -- I can understand Russian editors wanting to improve ru:wiki first and foremost, but if we are able to lay the right framework here on en:wiki, perhaps we can convince more editors from ru:wiki to come across here as well. To see major Russian articles, such as Russia, Russian language, Moscow etc not being WP:FA, it's a shame, and it will require a joint, group effort to improve these ever-important articles, so perhaps we can get some comments from you on the proposal, and maybe, just maybe, get you in on the project also, and lending your expertise on occasion also? Cheers -- Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 15:46, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I know you pretty active when it comes to Russia related wiki so I wanted to bring your attention to new Russian history infobox that I made. I need your opinion and suggestions. Thanks. Zealander ( talk) 00:35, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello, as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force, I have conducted a Good Article reassessment of Mummy, to which you have been a major contributor. I have a few concerns that should be addressed if the article is to remain listed as a GA. If you are able to help out, the reassessment can be found here. Thanks, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 15:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello. If you have a moment, could you add the Russian alphabet version of the title of A Month in the Country (play) to its article? Many thanks, DionysosProteus ( talk) 13:40, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello, as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force, I have conducted a Good Article reassessment of Gnezdovo, to which you have been a major contributor. I have a few concerns that should be addressed if the article is to remain listed as a GA. If you are able to help out, the reassessment can be found here. Thanks, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 18:05, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Apollo&daphne.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 01:33, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Althorv.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 01:48, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed that among your many contributions to Mikhail Lermontov some years ago, you included Vladimir Nabokov's translation of a famous poem. Do you have some reason to believe this isn't a copyvio? Nabokov's works are still certainly under copyright, and his son is quite careful about defending those rights. — JerryFriedman (Talk) 23:57, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:Dudinska.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Guest9999 ( talk) 18:23, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Андрей, почему Вы посчитали неинформативными добавления, сделанные 31 January and 17 February 2007? Заметьте: второе добавление стандартизитровало описание сайта ЮНЕСКО. На мой взгляд, ссылка на ту страницу сайта ЮНЕСКО, где содержится информация о монастыре, весьма информативна. Кроме того, я не пойму, почему неинформативна ссылка на фотографии монастыря. Заметьте, что та Ваша ссылка, которую я недавно поправила, указывала совсем не на Views of the monastery, а на его описание, да и кроме того - на русскую версию. -- Galina ovt 23 November 2008
Would you please help this poor guy from Norway who has lost his way in the Åland arhipelago. See Talk:Battle of Gangut. -- Petri Krohn ( talk) 23:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello, found this as I'm having some concern regarding the contributions of Geronimo20. See my discussion page at User_talk:Wikigi#Fishing_templates and December 2008. It seems that the issue has been raised before by contributors like yourself and that all discussions have been later deleted by Geronimo20, he does edit his own talk page on a regular basis to remove all trace of conflicts or adverse opinions. Any support would be appreciated, thanks - Wikigi | talk to me | 22:38, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Astrakhan kremlin.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 06:53, 20 December 2008 (UTC) -- Magog the Ogre ( talk) 06:53, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Левитан.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 07:11, 20 December 2008 (UTC) -- Magog the Ogre ( talk) 07:11, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Bolotnikov.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 13:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC) -- Magog the Ogre ( talk) 13:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bolvanovka.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 13:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Boris & gleb.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:52, 23 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 13:52, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Borisogleb rostov.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 06:15, 24 December 2008 (UTC) -- Magog the Ogre ( talk) 06:15, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bouillonarms.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 06:37, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Glad to hear. С Новым годом тебя тоже! -- Ghirla -трёп- 21:53, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Although you aren't officially here anymore, your work lives on. Keep firing in the new year! YellowMonkey ( bananabucket) 03:55, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Ghirlandajo. Could you give a better source for that file, and the year so we can establish public domain? Thanks. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 07:30, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Левитан.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 09:03, 3 January 2009 (UTC) -- Magog the Ogre ( talk) 09:03, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Cherkasov.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 09:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC) -- Magog the Ogre ( talk) 09:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Faina1942.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 09:22, 3 January 2009 (UTC) -- Magog the Ogre ( talk) 09:22, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Dmitrov.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 13:31, 3 January 2009 (UTC) -- Magog the Ogre ( talk) 13:31, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Andrey, there's a discussion here about some of your edits, which I believe involved copying a public-domain text. Although that means there's no copyright issue, there's still the plagiarism aspect — given that the article's about a very important writer, it would be good if we could write it in our own words.
It would be very helpful if you could go through the text and attribute the parts of it that are taken from elsewhere. Then we can decide which bits to rewrite, and which to leave as quotations. Many thanks, SlimVirgin talk| contribs 00:22, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hermitageswan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 14:32, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
FAC that may interest you. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 16:29, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
This photo Bronzewar.jpg is captioned "The en:Bronze Horseman camouflaged from the German aircraft during the en:Siege of Leningrad, en:August 8, en:1941" and is used and similarly captioned in Bronze Horseman. I think 'camouflaged' is wrong and should be 'protected' or similar word. The statue is not meant to be hidden but protected. Camouflage is meant to blend with the surrounding and background which is not the case. GS3 ( talk) 00:11, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Sure. Done.— Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • ( yo?); 17:36, February 17, 2009 (UTC)
Oh for the love of chicken! I don't know what part of the MOS requires that these images be unstacked, but you've created an unsightly gap in the article for no discernible purpose. The second image is not discussed in the article, so why do you persist? Is there something in the MOS that prevents what I did? Must you be so possessive and anti-social? -- Y not? 22:22, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Likhachev.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle ( talk) 17:02, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
~ Riana ⁂ 10:32, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Andrey, I am always amazed and delighted by the periodic DYKs that appear on my talk page, largely thanks to the work you do on the raw material I provide on the Humanities Desk. We make an ideal partnership, a little like Marx and Engels, or Laurel and Hardie! All the very best from Anastasia. Clio the Muse 22:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
-- Peta 23:58, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, for the nth time, for your nominations. Daniel 06:41, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Made some additions based on Brook and an article by Ehud Ya'ari. They both call the site "Khumar". Should we rename the article "Khumarinskoye gorodishche" or "Khumar", as Skhimar seems a rather obscure Georgian designation? -- Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 03:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- are both just dic defs. I've left pleas in a couple of places, & can chip in myself, but I'm sure you could make a great job of them. Any chance? Johnbod 19:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for the late reply. I have been very busy lately. I will address the issue when I have time (hopefully tonight). Hajji Piruz 23:59, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Howdy partner, liked your storm page Meteoguy 18:26, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your additions to the Trans-Caspian Railway article! However, I am asking that it be moved from Central Asian Railway back to its original article name. While 'Central Asian Railway' is a correct translation from the Russian name, it is rarely (if ever) used in English. I have checked all my English-language Central Asia books, and all mentions of the railway (from both historical-based and modern works) call it the Trans-Caspian. A Google search also verifies that this is the more common English name.
Ditto for the 'Tashkent Railway' article, which already exists as Trans-Aral Railway. I added all your info from the Tashkent Railway article to the Trans-Aral article, and then added a re-direct. I just wanted to let you know. Cheers! Otebig 18:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
-- Carabinieri 22:17, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
Image:Rozh.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
MER-C 09:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Hi Ghirla,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Rozh.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on December 23, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-12-23. howcheng { chat} 18:49, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
-- Allen3 talk 23:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Would anyone like to comment on this? -- Joopercoopers 11:03, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi Girlandajo! You wrote on the talk page of the article on Uspenski Cathedral in Helsinki that: "There is no explanantion why a church in Helsinki should occupy this generic title". There definitely is an explanation: Finland and Russia happen to have a common history 1809-1917. Kindly read my comment on this on the talk page of the article. By the way, your analysis about Wikipedia on your user page is thoughtprovoking! Cheers! -- Tellervo 11:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Ghirla, hi, I'm needing the help of a Wikipedia editor who actually knows something about the Mongols (in particular about their activities in the late 1200s). Preferably someone who actually has access to reliable sources, as opposed to someone who's just doing Google searches through pseudohistory websites. :/ Would you be a good person to help with this, or could you point me at someone else that might be able to help? Thanks, El on ka 19:47, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, do we need two articles on the same topic Battle of the Dardanelles (1807)? I notice you haved edited at them both. Chessy999 00:40, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, just to let you know that I protested against the by-passing of the nomination process here regarding the Kazanowski Palace. -- Camptown 20:47, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
---- Anonymous Dissident Talk 02:50, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi there. I saw your suggestions at the Reference Desk thread. Do you know of anyone (maybe you?) who would be able to draw up a more complete list of the most famous "battle" and "war" paintings that we should have articles on? commons:Category:Battle paintings might help. The list so far is:
Any more ideas? Carcharoth 08:04, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
-- Allen3 talk 10:52, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
Image:Alexander Litovchenko - Ivan the Terrible Showing Treasures to the English Ambassador Jerome Horsey.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Chris B •
talk •
contribs 14:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Hi Ghirla,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Alexander Litovchenko - Ivan the Terrible Showing Treasures to the English Ambassador Jerome Horsey.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on January 4, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-01-04. howcheng { chat} 00:41, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi Ghirlandajo! Thank you very much for the star! I do appreciate very much! Best regards PHG 15:16, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
-- Allen3 talk 15:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
I think the general idea is good (temperature information is encyclopedic and useful), but I, too, don't care much about this particular implementation. Peacock colors aside, the template is so wide (regardless of whether it is hidden by default) that it would more often than not clash with infoboxes and images. In Irkutsk in particular, there is no way to fix this situation unless the "Geography and climate" section is expanded (more than twice) or moved down (which isn't desirable either), or if the infobox is removed. I don't really know if there is a good solution.— Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • ( yo?); 16:01, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
-- Carabinieri 11:25, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
You never answered my question - why did you retask an article you've never edited before? -- Golbez 14:21, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Since medieval history is your cup of tea, could you please look at the edit war at Berehynia. I wrote this short article long ago and now Hillock seems eager to make a change supported by sources that seem dubious to me. Could you comment on how serious these sources appear to you or maybe you know of any other literature on the subject. TIA, -- Irpen 04:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Dear Ghirlandajo, I was simply trying to show you that your admin abuse allegations are baseless. You may not agree with admins, you may not agree with deletions an admin made, but that's no reason to be desysoped. In the same vein, if someone disagrees with your edit, that's no reason take your priveleges away. As for the RfC, are you aware that there need to be two other users who certify the dispute? I highly doubt that will happen because of one of my deletions. Maxim (talk) 12:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Glad you liked it! I'll have to think on the caption - I'm never good at those. Cheers Johnbod 13:21, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
I don't have a problem with your sig, it just seemed a bit hypocritical of you to complain of someone else using Cyrillic in their sig. I'm not sure what you mean about IRC. — Random832 23:45, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
I now think he misunderstood the link to "Moscou": [1]. That is a hamlet where I lived for some time. The place was NOT called that way in honour of "the French victory at Borodino" as many French tourists think. It was named after a detachment of Cossacks, who stayed there in 1815 waiting for a Cossack general to return from England. During the Hundred Days, Louis XVIII came to Ghent, and was put under their protection. Ghent tourist guides still mention the story of the French King sweating in his carriage, waiting for his Cossack guard to take him from his Hotel in the Veldstraat to the French consulate at St Anne's (both the Hotel Steenhuize and St. Anne's French consulate still exist). Louis XVIII, "Lowie die zwiet" (Louis who transpires) is still a nickname in Ghent for a, er, rather fat man. After Waterloo, the cossacks seem to have left for Paris, which they may have entered together with Tsar Alexander, but I cannot source that. I am sure, however, that there were no Russian soldiers at Waterloo, though the French may have thought otherwise: a small part of the Russo-German legion (by then incorporated into the Prussian army) reached Waterloo and was still wearing their green (Russian) uniforms. This photograph was once put on the internet to show how "Russian" the architecture of Moscou is. But that dom is actually in Ledeberg, the cottage houses on the left are in Moscou.
There is a "famous" tram service from the main Ghent station to where I used to live. I can assure you that there are some American tourists who think that the "Moscou" tram really drives all the way to Russia. The Dutch spelling of the capital of Russia is actually MosKou. In any case, since he uses the same "travels and life" set up, Martin should have seen in my travels that Russia was marked with weeks only. Before turning me into a Russian, he should have noticed that there was something funny there. -- Pan Gerwazy 10:27, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
-- Carabinieri 16:09, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Regardless of my zero knowledge of the history behind all these matters, I said that because why should administrators stoop down to that level to communicate their point? It really isn't necessary and in the future if someone with or without a history uses the board inappropriately, I would really be disappointed to see another response like that. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 16:31, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
This is not PD-Russia, this image is copyrighted. Alex Spade 07:13, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Ah, so it was слово as in Слово о плъку Игоревѣ. That makes sense. I knew there was little chance that Saint Gregory would have mentioned Slavic water sprites back in the 4th century. Cheers. -- Folantin 18:53, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks Ghirlandajo! I do appreciate! PHG 18:48, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
1. I'm in a dispute here (by the way, your own input there would be appreciated) where Dojarca claims that Rodina-Mat' referred to the USSR and not Russia. However, was there not a revived Great Russian nationalism during the Great Patriotic War, with even the Church brought back to life? I suppose an article on the concept would be illuminating, but until then, I'll see what you may have to say.
2. I know ий can be transliterated either -iy or -y, but when, if ever, is one preferred over the other? See point 2 here for why I ask, and why I think -y should be used in that case.
3. I note we lack an article on the Domostroi - is that something which you would be interested in writing at some point?
Thank you for your help. Biruitorul 23:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Ghirla, I suspect that Professor Vize has been made up by a determined hoaxer whom I've caught at Talk:Huvadhu_Atoll, while following up leads on a hoaxer I uncovered at Bourges. What do you think of "Professor Vize" with all his legitimnate links?-- Wetman 02:15, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Ghirla, I know you have your hands full all the time but if you have a minute, please consider taking a look at the Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/House of Gediminas and improving it if needed. I know of no better expert in the princely genealogy than yourself. -- Irpen 03:34, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi Ghirla, please do not hesitate to drop by on the Talk:Franco-Mongol alliance page, as there is some dispute as the extent and nature of the alliance. Your expertise would be welcome. Best regards. PHG 07:27, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Ghirla. I hadn't spotted the use of Template:WPRDAC before, it's a great idea. Xn4 18:35, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
can we discuss this amicably? I realize there is a history to this, and I don't want to trample over things, but the pages have issues. Most conspicuously, the sheer scope overlap of Etymology of Rus and Rus' (people). I don't want to push this unduly, there is no deadline, but some cleanup is definitely in order. regards, dab (𒁳) 21:23, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi Ghirla,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Maslenitsa kustodiev.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on October 6, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-10-06. howcheng { chat} 23:35, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Regarding Vladimir Wiese, is there a reason why you chose the German spelling "Wiese" instead of "Vize"? I have noticed that, except for the works that he wrote in German, he is most of the times (like for example in the bibliographies that appear in W. Barr's books), referred to as Professor "V. Yu. Vize". Mohonu 03:41, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Do we have an article on dom tvorchestva? I'm curious of its translation if exists. -- Brand спойт 10:07, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you Ghirlandajo for your authoritative support. I do appreciate very much. Best regards. PHG 19:38, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Ghirla, hi, I have to admit that I'm very confused about something you said about me. Would it be alright if we talked about it for a moment? My impression of you is that you're a prolific editor, who cares deeply about Wikipedia. I've read your userpage, and I agree with much of what you say! To my knowledge, we've never actually worked together on an article, though if I'm misremembering something, please let me know.
A couple times now, I've seen you refer to me as someone who "has to be proven right." Each time you've said this, I have been perplexed as to how you got this impression. Indeed, I feel that I am often criticized for the opposite, for being too quick to compromise! So, if you don't mind, could we clear the air a bit? Could you be more specific as to what you think that I have done, which has given you this negative impression of me? I definitely see you as someone that I would like to have as an ally, and not as an enemy. If you could please let me know what I might be able to do, to help us put any disagreements behind us, I would be very appreciative. Thanks, El on ka 17:34, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
I have sent an email to a flickr user to see if we can use his photo. If that doesn't work, [7] are some other choices we have. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 06:46, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Sometime this summer (back in June), you made an edit suggesting that you would support reverting the article on the Russian Orthodox Church back to a 2006 version. I left a message on the Talk Page asking why but you never responded. Perhaps you never saw my message. In any event, would you mind reviewing the article and sharing with me your thoughts as to whether the quality of the article is degraded from 2006 and whether you still support reverting or if you think it can be fixed? Thanks. -- Richard 09:02, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Ghirlandajo, I am still in the old dispute over the House of Munsö with user:Pieter Kuiper. He wants to remove stuff, while I want to keep in things that I find interesting. Please, join the discussion and give your opinion.-- Berig 16:07, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Many thanks for my newcomer award, much appreciated. Glad to see you've developed Nikolai Yevreinov too; I'd like to get around to more of the theatre people in Russia in that period. One thing, though: why the move to that spelling? I know the Russian names into English isn't straightforward, so I was wondering what your thinking was? DionysosProteus 22:23, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
I enjoyed your article on the Demidovs. I was reading about Karl von Hügel selling off his famous garden in 1848: most of the plants were sold to Anatole Demidov. I had no idea who this man was, and didn't expect there to be an article on him. Lo and behold, he is so famous as to have a chicken dish named after him! Hesperian 12:24, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Greetings,
Unproven claims to age 110+ should be categorized as category: longevity claims. A category, category: Russian supercentenarians should only be used IF a case is based on proven/documented records that have been accepted by an established world authority, such as Guinness World Records or the Gerontology Research Group. Also, religious ideas about longevity, even if cited in newspapers, should not be presented as 'fact'. Claims that those in the Caucasian live longer have been debunked for 30+ years. No case has ever proven true.
If you would like to be pro-active, however, we would like to find out whatever happened to Maria Strelnikova. Note that since she came from extreme northwest Russia, where records kept were generally better, I do wonder if there are any documents to prove her age (or if/when she died).
Please discuss.
Sincerely Robert Young Ryoung122 00:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,908667-1,00.html
The debunking of the Izumi case from Japan, likewise, came from the Japanese themselves (Suzuki et al). Thus what we have is not nationalism but 'science vs. mythology'. Myths are not just something that existed in the past; many people still believe them. The issue is whether we should continue the cycle of mis-information or finally live up to a standard of proof.
Note that the USA also had its own myths at the time, see Charlie Smith (centenarian) for more.
Finally, I left another note under 'Summer 2007' by accident instead of here.
Sincerely, Robert Young
Ryoung122 04:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Ghirla, could you kindly check the Russian names in the Finnish_Orthodox_Church#Russian_Orthodox_Church_in_Finland, thanks. -- Drieakko 06:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Your objections are duly noted. The decision is, admittedly, a work in progress; if you believe that I've missed noting any of the habitualy incivil parties, please feel free to name them (and present the requisite evidence, obviously).
But I'm not sure if you realize that the ruling in the Piotrus case was intended as a final warning, not as mere idle chatter. The community of editors working on EE topics was told that their normal style of interaction was unacceptable. They have failed to improve it. And thus it has become necessary to use less gentle methods in order to bring this continual infighting to an end. Kirill 11:14, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
You wrote on the discussion page of Sergius of Valaam, that there is text about this possible founder of Valaam monastery in the internet. Yes, but in Kyrillic text! Would you kindly translate some portions of it to us who don't know Russian? -- Tellervo 17:09, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your edit in Ogygia, regarding original research. I have removed the tagged text and replaced it. You might like to check and comment on it. Odysses (☜) 10:09, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
During the FAC of Victoria Cross for Australia the validity of the copyright tag on Image:Malakhov2.jpg has been questioned. The author of the work died in 1928 and as such does not meet the requirements for +100 years. Could it be changed or updated? Although i have removed from the VC for OZ page, it would still be good to clear it up. Thanks. Woodym555 16:49, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
The 25 DYK Medal | ||
I noticed you didn't have the 25 DYK medal, so for a laugh I thought I'd give it you. Seriously though, you're a great wikipedian; it should be mandatory to look up to you. :) Cheers, Spawn Man 04:34, 11 October 2007 (UTC) |
Dear Ghirla. Thanks for your help and advice. I took your advice and have been sticking to content to see how it goes; it's worked, and I've decided finally not to leave wiki ... at least not for a while. Let me know if I can ever help you with anything. Best regards, Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk) 16:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Ciao, and sorry for the late answer, but I was (and, actually, I am still ;-)) on holidays. Of course I know this church! I visited it last spring, and I started to write an article about it in september. It should be ready by the end of October. I hope that it will appear on DYK, since the story of this small church is quite interesting. Cheers, Alex2006 13:46, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Ready to swab the decks! | ||
Another motley scallawag has joined the crew. Thanks for your comments at my RFA. Arrrgh! - - Jehochman Talk 05:18, 12 October 2007 (UTC) |
Sorry that I'm a bit late (due to the Toolserver replication lag), but I'm happy to congratulate you on this milestone. Good luck in further contributions! :) — Kalan ? 15:57, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Ghirlandajo. If you could give a source for this image on commons; someone transfered it to commons, but it still doesn't have a source. It would be appreciated. Thanks. 64.178.96.168 17:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
I saw your comment on Talk:Loire Valley about Vandalism. I have just reverted some Vandalism there and I will be putting a link to this article on my User Page to monitor it. Kathleen.wright5 13:00, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Посмотри фотографию, пожалуйста. Я так понимаю, ты её в ен-вики грузил. Может что скажешь? Представленного разрешения явно недостаточно. ~ kintup 21:02, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. Among the principles passed was At wit's end which states that necessary measures must be adopted by the Arbitration Committee in cases where repeated attempts to stop disruptive disputes have failed. As a result of the case, both Digwuren and Petri Krohn are banned for one year. There has also been a general restriction to all editors working on topis related to Eastern Europe and a warning to all those who may, in the future, attempt to use Wikipedia as a battleground that they may be banned when the matter is reported to the Committee. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Cbrown1023 talk 22:22, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Andrej, you split this off Medici, but I wonder whether such a "Florentine" calendar existed. Were you too trusting? I noted my doubts at Talk:Florentine calendar. What do you think, looking at the article again? -- Wetman 08:01, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:EltonJohnElectricitySingleCover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at
Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the
media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:40, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Andrey, would you look at my start on this interesting gent and correct any gaffes I've committed? There's surely a Russian wiki, yes?. -- Wetman 17:49, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey, Ghirla! A Swedish revisionist tries portray the Battle of Lesnaya (which the majority of sources calls a crushing defeat of the Swedes) as a draw. Some other moron has frozen the article. Could you please help in the discussion? Thank you. Voyevoda 22:35, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Здравствуйте. Проверьте, пожалуйста, почту. ru.Media 16:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Russia is currently a featured article candidate. Please feel free to leave comments here.-- Miyokan 11:54, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello Mr Ghirlandajo, can you take a look at this article which i translated yesterday from the German Wikipedia? I tried to change its name to Rumyantsev Museum and than i found out the name is already in use. Can you integrage this two, improve mine or change the redirect to your article? What would be the best? Taksen 09:03, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I'm gathering material together to create a little article on the Maly Theatre, Moscow, and I'm a little confused, so I wondered whether you might have a little time to help me clear something up? I don't speak/read Russian, which is probably where I'm going wrong. My draft scribblings are here.
I'm confused about when the theatre was created. I realise there was a company first, then the building came later. But when was the company set up?
The babel-fish translation of the Maly's own history page on their website seems to imply it was the Imperial decree in 1756 that founded the company, along with Moscow Uni (although the Wikipedia article for the uni says 1755, so that's odd), as does a Russian news-page saying they're celebrating 250yr anniversary. However, all the sources in books in English that I can find - Cambridge Guide to Theatre, Oxford Companion to Theatre say it was founded in 1805 or 1806. The new page about celebrating anniversary says it's the oldest professional theatre in Russia, but the actors were students at the Uni, which suggests amateur. Brockett's History of Theatre says 1805 when the crown purchased 74 serf actors; so I don't get how the students and serfs could be one company. I realise that all the theatres came under control of the government then, but it's a bit unclear how this worked. Then they got a building in 1824 (on this, the sources agree). From then on, it becomes first the House of Shchepkin then the House of Ostrovsky, and the sources settle down and start to agree with one another.
I'm leaving this note on Miyokan's page too. If you have time to look at it for me, I'd be grateful. The web sources in Russian are here:
Many thanks, DionysosProteus 14:05, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you uploaded the 19th century picture of the Kazan Cathedral. I'm wondering if you perhaps know the source of it; I would like to be able to cite the original source. Can you please reply to my discussion page?
Thanks much, Sir Pimpernel 02:03, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, can you please shed some light on the relation between the two and if indeed it was the same person? Thanks
StevanMD 13:40, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Volotsk.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Remember the dot ( talk) 02:48, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
As you have shown interest for Central Asian topics, for your information, the FA article on the Indo-Greek kingdom is under FA review. You may leave comments and vote at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Indo-Greek Kingdom. PHG ( talk) 18:24, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Can you think of anything to add here - we don't have very good coverage! Johnbod ( talk) 23:56, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Where's the source for this? As I understand, photos of sculptures are not necessarily in the public-domain by default. -- VegitaU ( talk) 01:09, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Гирландайо, несравненный %) вы не включите её в свой список наблюдения? А то там часто по-мелкому правят анонимы, а я, во-первых, не очень часто сюда заглядываю, а во-вторых, не настолько владею языком, чтобы оценить стилистические тонкости в акцентах, которые смещаются пристрастными товарищами. -- Shakko kitsune 12:14, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Halo I write article Sveneld in Polish wiki. I have question: from where (title article or book) originate, Gumilev theory about Sveneld?-- Polelum 15:27, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:Apollo&daphne.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the
media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.
VegitaU (
talk) 00:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Apollo&daphne.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following
this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a
non-free license (per
Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted
48 hours after 00:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
VegitaU (
talk) 00:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Dear Ghirla, we miss you here! Your vast diamond-quality contributions, your principled stand against various cranks and cooks, you felicitous remarks at various boards helped in forming the Wikipedia what it has become. I understand that you left due to stress and you would have been back if you were over it. So, I am not trying to rush you. Please take all the time you need to forget the stressful part but do come back when you are ready. Hope this will happen sooner... -- Irpen 03:45, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello Ghirla,
I just came across your 28-Feb-2006 comment on the Knyaz talk page, where you state that "There are no Slavic loans from Celtic, as best I know."
There are commonalities, but I don't know that I would refer to it as borrowing from one people to another. Consider, for example, the Gaelic name "MacGowan". The first syllable in the Gaelic "Mac" changes (called a mutatation), depending on its location in a sentence, and so is often spelled Mhic (the vowel becomes short, and the M mutates to a V), and it is pronounced Vic. Slavs put this at the end of a name, and Gaels put it before the name, but it is the same word, which you certainly recognize. Now, if you recognize Gowan as Kowal, then the name makes sense.
Regards, 24.178.228.14 ( talk) 18:01, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your very kind note on my Talk: page, it is much appreciated. Jayjg (talk) 03:12, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello! Could You move Daumantas of Pskov to Dovmont. I saw You were arguing for this move. I agree with You. 81.7.98.250 ( talk) 06:47, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Dear Ghirla,
I saw that you worked on the Uzbek people article. User:E104421 who is known for his Pan-Turkist bias and who is on a 1RR parole because of his edits in various Turkey- and Turks-related article has recently vandalized the Uzbek people article, deleting at least 5 academic sources: [8]
I have reverted his recent vandalism, but someone else with more experience should watch the article. The mentioned user is also deleting academic sources from other articles whenever he feels that those sources are against his nationalist views: [9].
Thank you for your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.83.159.59 ( talk) 23:59, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Poklonka.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Remember the dot ( talk) 18:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
I made changes, now refering from Mons family:
I started articles in German Wikipedia.
Yours sincerely, Simplicius ( talk) 21:27, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
I'm currently copyediting vampire, which includes quite a few sources in Russian and other slavic languages. Would you be so kind as to review my reference formatting to make sure I didn't do any major mess? Circeus ( talk) 21:04, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Phiale.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 14:44, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Scythian resurrection.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 14:57, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Vladimir by klodt.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at
Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the
media copyright questions page. Thank you. —
Remember the dot (
talk) 01:52, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered,
Image:Vladimir by klodt.jpg, has been listed at
Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the
image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at
the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —
Remember the dot (
talk) 06:34, 23 December 2007 (UTC) --—
Remember the dot (
talk) 06:34, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
And s nastupayushchim from me! -- Paul Pieniezny ( talk) 21:44, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Siysky.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Remember the dot ( talk) 03:15, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Toliatti.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Remember the dot ( talk) 05:43, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Ghirla, Happy Christmas & New Year! If you are still doing new stuff here, we could really use a short article on the precious metal icon-cover - I can't even remember the proper name for them. All the best. Johnbod ( talk) 20:23, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Kizhi old.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 20:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Nevsky.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at
Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the
media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (
talk) 21:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Obraztsov.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Rettetast (
talk) 14:00, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Severyn Nalivaiko.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 08:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Eskov.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BorgQueen ( talk) 07:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Ghirla! Your opinion would be highly appreciated at some of the current discussions at Talk:Franco-Mongol alliance. Best regards. PHG ( talk) 08:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Eskov.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 10:34, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Tana cornaro.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 08:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mchekhov.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:44, 28 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Remember the dot ( talk) 04:44, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Yarplan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 03:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ivanvasil.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 22:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ivanvasil2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 22:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Ghirlandajo. I am again being attacked by Elonka and some of her supporters at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Franco-Mongol alliance/Workshop. Could you kindly give your opinion? Thank you. PHG ( talk) 17:16, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:User no IRC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 21:38, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Ballada2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at
Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our
criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the
media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (
talk) 05:47, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Ghirla, I noticed you were the uploader of Image:Vasnetsov samolet.jpg. The textile arts project is running a featured portal drive and I've been doing a lot of image restorations. You've uploaded tons of images; if something else of yours relates to textiles and might become feature-worthy with a restoration, please drop me a link. Must be at least 1000px on a side and have good focus without .jpg artifacting. I can take care of dust and scratches. Cheers, Durova Charge! 20:19, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Ghirla:
Lately there have been a lot of problems in the Soviet Intervention in Afghanistan article. Two users, Raoulduke47 and Scythian1, are making all sorts of misbalanced, confused statements in the article. They are turning it into a farce.
I think my most recent edits (check the history) are the most objective way of handling the article, but these other two posters are blanking my edits and turing the article into a flame war.
They are claiming that the Soviet Union collapsed because of a "military defeat" in Afghanistan, and that the war had a "profound" and traumatic impact on the USSR.
They are citing an article published in 1999 to support their views. The views of the article's authors are isolated, and are regarded as farfetched by almost all other authorities on the subject.
From the way Raoulduke47 and Scythian1 write the article, you'd think they were talking about the impact of WW1/Brest-Litovsk or the 1241 Mongol invasion. They don't understand that the Afghan intervention was desultory skirmishing...just a sideshow to what was really happening in the USSR and the world at the time.
Isn't there any way the misblanced views of these contributors can be controlled?
Kenmore ( talk) 20:30, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
I have already explained why: 1) your sources are inadequate, and 2) why the sources should not form the cornerstone of the article’s perspective. Harvard historian Richard Pipes is regarded as the world’s leading Soviet/Russian scholar, and his views are far different than those of Reuveny and Prakash (whom you cite). So why brush aside Pipes in favor of Reuveny and Prakash? Ditto for Mark Urban. Urban’s book “War and Afghanistan” is widely regarded as one of the best and most reliable accounts of the Soviet-Afghan situation, and Urban’s conclusions are far different than those of your “sources”. So why ignore Urban? I could list dozens of other leading scholars to support my claim as well.
Reuveny and Prakash’s article is not very good. I knew a student at Johns Hopkins and when I asked him about the article, he laughed and called its argument “far fetched.” Reuveny and Prakash’s article is simply not a respected scholarly work on this subject and it should not be used as the basis of a Wikipedia account of the Soviet-Afghan epoch.
The other “sources” you cite – Viorst, Hilali, and Daugherty – consist of just isolated remarks in books that do not directly concern what happened on the ground in Afghanistan or in Soviet society following the war. Those books concern subjects that are tangential to the Soviet-Afghan conflict. To use these “sources” to set the tone and flow of the article is irresponsible.
My perspective is not pro Russian/Soviet either. I am merely trying to establish the truth about the Soviet-Afghan epoch. Richard Pipes, after all, is known for being vehemently anti-Soviet and he’s not especially sympathetic to post-USSR Russia, either. Yet even Pipes does not make the ridiculous, far fetched claims that Reuveny and Prakash do.
There was no Soviet military defeat in Afghanistan (read Urban). There war had no “profound” effect on Soviet society (read Pipes). Your sources – and the irresponsible claims you make based on those sources – need to go. Kenmore ( talk) 01:33, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
File:David,larry.JPG | My RFA | |
Thank you muchly for your support in
my recent request for adminship, which was successfully closed on 76%, finishing at 73 supports, 23 opposes and 1 neutral. The supports were wonderful, and I will keep in mind the points made in the useful opposes and try to suppress the Larry David in me! Now I'm off to issue some cool down blocks, just to get my money's worth!
Kidding btw. Hope you decide to come back here properly in the not too distant future. Really! All the best, Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk) 11:46, 5 March 2008 (UTC) |
Ghirla:
Could you take down or delete the "Battle of Krasnoi Peer Review" page you created in 2006? Very few people contributed to it, and right now it's just litter visible to anyone who does a "Krasnoi" google search. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/Battle_of_Krasnoi
I still intend to improve the Battle of Krasnoi and Battle of Vyazma articles in the future, by the way. They will definitely reach "A" status before long.
Thanks. Kenmore ( talk) 12:55, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Ghirla! Would you be interesting in providing a comment on this? Thanks!— Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • ( yo?); 13:26, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Zdorovo. I am stopping by to let you know that Template:Peacockterm has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — -- Y not be working? 23:49, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Ghirla, here's hoping this is up your alley. Found a beautiful image file on Commons in a clear high resolution version that might be featured picture material, but the voters will want more background than the uploader provided. Would you or one of the other Russian editors be able to help out? And perhaps conominate? Best regards, Durova Charge! 19:59, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
I suppose you may not want to answer this until your own Easter, but still felt like wishing you the best on this day. Feel free to delete this or transfer it to a later header on your own Easter, by the way.-- Paul Pieniezny ( talk) 18:01, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Indeed, Христос Воскресе! From your "confrontational" friend Biruitorul ( talk) 02:01, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Happy Easter, Ghirla! Hope to see you back here when the time is right for you. -- Irpen 08:12, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Can you keep an eye on this, my Russian history can be a little vague and awry at times. Thanks Giano ( talk) 11:13, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Lubyanka 1916.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 12:26, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Кириллов.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of
fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets
Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.
The following images also have this problem:
This is an automated notice by
FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see
Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
It would be immensely helpful to the project, and me, if you made a brief return to proper editing and wrote Elizabethan Baroque. You are the best one to do it, and I trust your edits as much as any reference book, probably more than one or two I can think of - what do you say? Giano ( talk) 17:44, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
I was in Russia in the fall of 2006 and took thousands of pictures. Some are in your area and I saw your picture of Sergiyev Posad. I was there also and would appreciate it if you can help identify some of the images I took. -- Ted-m ( talk) 02:01, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Would you mind improving the arcticle I did on Zhivoy (film)? The article Ru:Живой (фильм) is a bit larger.-- Ted-m ( talk) 02:46, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
I have been told you are an authority on Russian history.Hopefully, you will be able to help me out.I edited an article on Philippa of Hainault,whose maternal ancestry can be traced back to Elizabeth of Bosnia,who was the daughter of Kuthen,Khan of the Cumens and his Russian wife,a de Halicz/Galicie who is said to have been the daughter of Mstislav,Prince de Halicz (1175-1228)but the article on Mstislav in Wikipedia seems to indicate that she may have been his granddaughter.We need to link her to someone because many people are wondering who exactly she was and her precise relationship to Mstislav.Thank you very much. jeanne ( talk) 14:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Allatarasova.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following
this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a
non-free license (per
Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted
48 hours after 08:08, 18 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to
opt out of receiving this notice?
Kelly
hi! 08:08, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered,
Image:Annenkov.jpg, has been listed at
Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the
image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at
the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
Kelly
hi! 07:18, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Asmenshikov.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following
this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a
non-free license (per
Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted
48 hours after 15:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to
opt out of receiving this notice?
Kelly
hi! 15:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Athanasefet.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 15:22, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed you made a few edits to this a while ago. The template has changed recently, in a way I think is detrimental. If you have any opinions on what it's content or form should be, some input from you may be useful. Thanks Ha! ( talk) 17:38, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Could I ask you to make a pass through Channel One (Russia)? I did my best to clean up the citations, but my Russian is really minimal (it might be maybe my 10th-best language; I don't usually even count it); I made some use of Google Translate to try to understand some of the footnotes (though I didn't always follow it literally) and I did my best to cut some that really obviously did not meet our "reliable sources" criteria; I have my doubts about some of the ones that remain. Anyway, I think it could use some attention from a native Russian speaker who is also a good Wikipedian, hence my request to you. - Jmabel | Talk 23:35, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
In case you'll be concerned that I've gone from the Russian wiki, please, don't worry. I'll continue editing here. Maybe after a break, but I shall. Cmapm ( talk) 22:43, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Good morning Ghirla! You are very welcome, but thanks for what? Ciao, Alex2006 ( talk) 09:58, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Gauguin arles.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? BlueAzure ( talk) 05:39, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
May I alert you to a discussion on merging Ondine (Sir Frederick Ashton ballet) into Ondine (Henze)! — Robert Greer ( talk) 18:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, noticed you are the primary contributor in the article. Can you please use some inline citation in this article? Thanks. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 07:57, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
She is known in the West as Lydia Masterkova. See [13]. WWGB ( talk) 10:54, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Voinaimir.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.
BJBot (
talk) 12:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your support at my recent Request for adminship. I hope you find I live up to your expectations. Best, Risker ( talk) 16:13, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Abramstevo.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 14:04, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Althorv.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 00:39, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Antikiller.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 05:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Arkaim.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 07:52, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Arqaim.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 08:29, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Batalov.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's
criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to
the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at
Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page.
STBotI (
talk) 22:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bayanova.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 23:12, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Benoisoldiers.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's
criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to
the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at
Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page.
STBotI (
talk) 02:12, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Biblioteka.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's
criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to
the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at
Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page.
STBotI (
talk) 04:10, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Bondarchuk.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's
criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to
the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at
Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page.
STBotI (
talk) 10:47, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
For those of us unfamiliar with this, could you enlighten? Balloonman ( talk) 06:30, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Peresvet.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Hallo, it is nice to meet you again. Now I have another question. Every biblical manuscript has a symbol number according classification Gregory-Aland. I do not know what is symbol number for the Tribezond Gospel. There is List of New Testament minuscules, and I want to include the Trebizond Gospel to this list. You wrote an article ru:Фингалова пещера, I wrote pl:Grota Fingala, and also the monasteries of Athos, and the biblical manuscripts. Nice work. We have the same interests. By the way, can you correct ru:Список унциальных рукописей Нового Завета. We need articles: ru:Послания Павла, ru:Соборные послания. I can do that, but not quickly. Досвидания. Leszek Jańczuk ( talk) 11:10, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey Andrey. Long time no talk. I've been working recently on the Mordvins and Volga Finns articles. The Mordvins article was moved last November to Volgaic Finns. However, I reverted the move yesterday after discussing it with Untifler at User talk:Untifler#Question. The problem is that some of the surrounding articles are still quite a mess. For example, Moksha people is totally unsourced and doesn't even mention the Mordvins at all. Same with Erzya people. I think these articles need to be fixed up, but I also think that the underlying problem is that these articles are not clear at all on whether the Moksha and Erzya are supgroups of the Mordvins, or distinct ethnic groups in their own right. Do you know the history behind the term "Mordvin"? Perhaps you could help me clarify it in these articles. Also, the article about Tyushtya is totally unsourced and largely confusing. Maybe you could assist me in this page as well. Finally, Volga Finns needs to be expanded. If the info from ru:Волжские финны is reliable, neutral, and sourced, I guess someone could translate at least part of it into English. Please let me know if you're too busy, but thanks in advance. Khoi khoi 21:21, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Any updates? Just curious. Khoi khoi 22:11, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey,
Do you have a source (perhaps in Russian?) that she made it to 100 years old so that we can re-add her with a proper reference to the List of centenarians? I checked, but I couldn't find one (and I don't read Russian), so I was wondering if you had or knew of one. Cheers, CP 20:32, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello Ghirla, I was wondering where Nabokov wrote about Sergei Ozhegov [15] because I would like to read it. Could you please cite it in the article. Thanks in advance. Regards, dvdrw 01:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, some years ago you added "Parts of the Orkhon Valley Cultural Landscape are situated in this province." to the Orkhon Province article. Was this just a guess, or do you happen to have some source for the claim? Most of the significant parts of this world heritage site seem to be situated much further south. Regards, Yaan ( talk) 22:53, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Ghirla! Could you, please, explain, what in the world crossed your way in the Petrozavodsk article? Looking at the edits which allegedly "have no merit whatsoever", I actually see a mix of edits, some of which indeed have no such merit, some are fairly useful, some are mostly technical, and some are not very important but do no harm nevertheless. If you want to clean up the article, why not just clean up the truly problematic parts, whatever they are, instead of reverting to some random edit from the past? And what's up with the infobox? I don't know if I should be surprised that one day you hate the whole infobox concept, the other day you love them, and the following day you are back to hating them again, but this particular one happens to be quite complete and well-developed. You should know very well that if you take this infobox out, some poor well-intentioned soul will add it back weeks or months later, except that it will be one part empty and the other part filled with stuff that's laughably inaccurate. You and me might not be around at the time to fix it. What good will that do?
Anyway, I restored the article in its most recent condition. If there are some urgent problems I am just not seeing but which you don't have time to fix yourself, please post a list of them on the article's talk page. I'll try to have them fixed without such drastic measures as whole-sale reversals.
Nice to see you back, by the way. Cheers,— Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • ( yo?); 01:46, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, Ghirla, for confirming my Language Ref Desk query today. I'm gaining more confidence with reading and typing Cyrillic but remain at the level of individual letters, relatively few words, and zero grammar. As my in-house Russophone colleagues haven't much English, I prefer checking these subtle texts here. Your contribution is appreciated! -- Cheers, Deborahjay ( talk) 17:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Good morning Ghirla! I wrote another article about a church in Constantinople. Ciao, Alex2006 ( talk) 05:46, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Per ruling of the arbcom here: Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Orangemarlin#Arbitrator_views_and_discussion an RFAR on Orangemarlin has been opend here: Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#User:Orangemarlin. You are invited to submit your evidence and statements.. — Rlevse • Talk • 16:53, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Ghirla, Hello! I have been looking at the article Economy of Russia for some time now, and feel like it could use some major improvements. This actually motivated me to register: however, I’m new around here and don’t want to do anything too major without the guidance and support of a wikipedia veteran. You seem to be the only person on Economy of Russia’s talk page Talk:Economy of Russia who is currently active, so I decided to send you a message. Apart from putting in citations/citations needed tags, checking for accuracy of numbers, etc. some major things I’d like to do (or see happen) are 1.moving a large amount of the information into an Economic history of Russia page, and adding a lot of missing information about what has happened in the past 2-3 years. So, I have two questions for you. First, do you have any advice for me before I start doing anything drastic? Also, if I created a list of possible changes to Economy of Russia (since there are so many changes that need to be done) would I post that on the talk page, or would it belong somewhere else? Thanks, Dettoaltrimenti ( talk) 09:22, 1 July 2008 (UTC) P.S. I hope I posted this right on your talk page... sorry if I didn't.
Thanks for uploading Image:8thdukecroy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following
this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a
non-free license (per
Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted
48 hours after 06:50, 3 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
O
sama
K 06:50, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Could you please move Königsberg Schlossteich to current name? I see there is a Russian interwiki, but can't read azbuka properly. Thanks. - Darwinek ( talk) 09:58, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi Ghirla !
I've tried to translate your interesting article about Suyab. What do you think about the translation? If there is anything false, feel free to correct the mistakes. Thanks. Necrid Master ( talk) 20:09, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello Ghirla:
I believe you created the Battle of Krasnoi peer review page in 2006. Can you explain to me what I have to do to delete it completely? I do not want people to find it when they do a "krasnoi" google search. Please advise. Thank you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/Battle_of_Krasnoi
Kenmore ( talk) 03:21, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Hey Ghirla, what is this aggression and rudeness actually about? I certainly don't "own" Fish farming. You say the article is in a "sorry state". Please explain what you mean. As far as the template you refer to, there are another sixty of those templates relating to fishing and fisheries. Each one has a lead menu item which goes to the lead article for that template. The lead article and the template share the same image. This works across 900 articles in the fishing and fisheries project, and no-one has ever complained before. -- Geronimo20 ( talk) 06:10, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Good Morning Ghirla! I wrote a small article about the Church of St. Mary of Blachernae, and I have a question for you about the Icon of the Blachernitissa. In the related article it is written that the Icon escaped the distruction of the church and was brought first to the Athos and then to Russia. Now, none of my sources mentions this fact, but they say that all the relics burned in the fire which destroyed the church. According to your knowledge, is this translation of the Icon documented, or is only a legend? Many thanks, Cheers, Alex2006 ( talk) 07:19, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Aleksey_Arakcheyev.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. O sama K 13:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Молодец! Отлично! The words in the subject/headline and in the first lines of this paragraph are what my instructors have been writing on my homework, and so I write them to you for your excellent work here, and on ru:. I hope you don't mind that I nominated Ivan Pyryev for DYK after expanding it a little myself. Feel free to improve or rewrite the hook. [16] Regards, dvdrw 02:20, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent work on the above article. It looks alot better now and I'm definitely not as confused as I was before. Jasynnash2 ( talk) 08:37, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
-- JayHenry ( talk) 05:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Rudget ( logs) 11:30, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Rudget ( logs) 11:34, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi Ghirla, someone came to me with a question about a really famous photograph and whether it remains in the public domain under the new Russian copyright law: Image:The Commissar Vanishes 2.jpg. We can't find the photographer's name Googling English language sources. It looks like we'll need the photographer's name and date of death to determine whether this is still public domain. Otherwise, unfortunately, it needs to be deleted from Commons and reloaded locally to en:wiki with restricted placement per fair use guidelines. Could you assist with this research? I'd really like to keep this on Commons if we can. Best wishes, Durova Charge! 05:57, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
I just noticed that your excellent photo of this Russian scholar/professor needs some updating: Image:Golenishchev.jpg Perhaps, you or Rudget knows the correct tag for it? Regards, Leoboudv ( talk) 04:58, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:Elizaveta_vorontsova.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the
media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.
O
sama
K 11:26, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
--Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 18:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Dear Ghirla, please accept my belated but sincere thanks for your input on this perennial question. I once went as far as consulting the Slavic languages staff at the U.S. Library of Congress for advice on romanization of Cyrillic titles, but I think proper names are in a class by themselves and the jury's still out. I'll keep you in mind for future consultations, if you'd be so kind. -- Cheers, Deborahjay ( talk) 13:02, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
You may be interested in this. Martintg ( talk) 06:31, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Where did you get that his real name is Пугонькин? --Yuriy Lapitskiy ~ 16:36, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Piotrus 2/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Piotrus 2/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, — Coren (talk) 22:02, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Ghirla, how nice to again see your dauntless posts here and there around the site. About those imagebot posts that you don't care about... User:Tex explained to me that the {{nobots}} template doesn't work very well. But putting {{bots|deny=all}} on the page would probably keep the bots away. It seems to be working for me. Best, Bishonen | talk 21:08, 31 August 2008 (UTC).
Ghirla, hi, we're currently working on the essay Wikipedia:Tag team. Since you have a fair bit of experience in dealing with these groups, I would like to invite you to come and participate in the writing of the essay. If you're not interested, no problem, but I did want to make sure you were invited. :) -- El on ka 16:13, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading
Image:Zerkalo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by
Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from
Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an
image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our
criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Sfan00 IMG (
talk) 12:14, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Greetings, Ghirla, and thanks for your input on the discussion. I'm inviting you to look at what I added (in case you're not following the page). And colleagues express concern and wonder, "Why do you spend so much time on Wikipedia?"... much as I wonder, why do I spend relatively more time patrolling the Ref Desks rather than working on mainspace articles? Answer: because I do believe people read it, besides the Original Posters of queries (including the trollish sort), and there may be a way to get through to them. But it can get quite exhausting, y'know! As is living in a conflicted world. -- Cheers, Deborahjay ( talk) 20:52, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Hey Ghirla, we haven't really bumped into each other in the past, and I have read various discussions which you have had with others, and can understand your reasons for all but giving up on en:wiki, but the question is what do we have to do to get back here, and I mean back here with a "vengeance" (so to speak). I have started a proposal at WP:RUSSIA to merge several projects into one main WP:RUSSIA project, and hopefully start laying the groundwork for getting WP:RUSSIA where it should be as a project. But, it is going to require people with sense, people with experience, etc, and I am hoping that you may be able to take a look at the proposal, and comment on it as necessary -- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Russia/Proposal -- one of the main things that we at en:wiki need to do is to obtain more able editors from ru:wiki -- I can understand Russian editors wanting to improve ru:wiki first and foremost, but if we are able to lay the right framework here on en:wiki, perhaps we can convince more editors from ru:wiki to come across here as well. To see major Russian articles, such as Russia, Russian language, Moscow etc not being WP:FA, it's a shame, and it will require a joint, group effort to improve these ever-important articles, so perhaps we can get some comments from you on the proposal, and maybe, just maybe, get you in on the project also, and lending your expertise on occasion also? Cheers -- Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 15:46, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I know you pretty active when it comes to Russia related wiki so I wanted to bring your attention to new Russian history infobox that I made. I need your opinion and suggestions. Thanks. Zealander ( talk) 00:35, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello, as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force, I have conducted a Good Article reassessment of Mummy, to which you have been a major contributor. I have a few concerns that should be addressed if the article is to remain listed as a GA. If you are able to help out, the reassessment can be found here. Thanks, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 15:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello. If you have a moment, could you add the Russian alphabet version of the title of A Month in the Country (play) to its article? Many thanks, DionysosProteus ( talk) 13:40, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello, as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force, I have conducted a Good Article reassessment of Gnezdovo, to which you have been a major contributor. I have a few concerns that should be addressed if the article is to remain listed as a GA. If you are able to help out, the reassessment can be found here. Thanks, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 18:05, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Apollo&daphne.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 01:33, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Althorv.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 01:48, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed that among your many contributions to Mikhail Lermontov some years ago, you included Vladimir Nabokov's translation of a famous poem. Do you have some reason to believe this isn't a copyvio? Nabokov's works are still certainly under copyright, and his son is quite careful about defending those rights. — JerryFriedman (Talk) 23:57, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:Dudinska.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Guest9999 ( talk) 18:23, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Андрей, почему Вы посчитали неинформативными добавления, сделанные 31 January and 17 February 2007? Заметьте: второе добавление стандартизитровало описание сайта ЮНЕСКО. На мой взгляд, ссылка на ту страницу сайта ЮНЕСКО, где содержится информация о монастыре, весьма информативна. Кроме того, я не пойму, почему неинформативна ссылка на фотографии монастыря. Заметьте, что та Ваша ссылка, которую я недавно поправила, указывала совсем не на Views of the monastery, а на его описание, да и кроме того - на русскую версию. -- Galina ovt 23 November 2008
Would you please help this poor guy from Norway who has lost his way in the Åland arhipelago. See Talk:Battle of Gangut. -- Petri Krohn ( talk) 23:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello, found this as I'm having some concern regarding the contributions of Geronimo20. See my discussion page at User_talk:Wikigi#Fishing_templates and December 2008. It seems that the issue has been raised before by contributors like yourself and that all discussions have been later deleted by Geronimo20, he does edit his own talk page on a regular basis to remove all trace of conflicts or adverse opinions. Any support would be appreciated, thanks - Wikigi | talk to me | 22:38, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Astrakhan kremlin.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 06:53, 20 December 2008 (UTC) -- Magog the Ogre ( talk) 06:53, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Левитан.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 07:11, 20 December 2008 (UTC) -- Magog the Ogre ( talk) 07:11, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Bolotnikov.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 13:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC) -- Magog the Ogre ( talk) 13:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bolvanovka.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 13:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Boris & gleb.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:52, 23 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 13:52, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Borisogleb rostov.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 06:15, 24 December 2008 (UTC) -- Magog the Ogre ( talk) 06:15, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bouillonarms.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 06:37, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Glad to hear. С Новым годом тебя тоже! -- Ghirla -трёп- 21:53, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Although you aren't officially here anymore, your work lives on. Keep firing in the new year! YellowMonkey ( bananabucket) 03:55, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Ghirlandajo. Could you give a better source for that file, and the year so we can establish public domain? Thanks. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 07:30, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Левитан.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 09:03, 3 January 2009 (UTC) -- Magog the Ogre ( talk) 09:03, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Cherkasov.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 09:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC) -- Magog the Ogre ( talk) 09:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Faina1942.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 09:22, 3 January 2009 (UTC) -- Magog the Ogre ( talk) 09:22, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Dmitrov.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 13:31, 3 January 2009 (UTC) -- Magog the Ogre ( talk) 13:31, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Andrey, there's a discussion here about some of your edits, which I believe involved copying a public-domain text. Although that means there's no copyright issue, there's still the plagiarism aspect — given that the article's about a very important writer, it would be good if we could write it in our own words.
It would be very helpful if you could go through the text and attribute the parts of it that are taken from elsewhere. Then we can decide which bits to rewrite, and which to leave as quotations. Many thanks, SlimVirgin talk| contribs 00:22, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hermitageswan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 14:32, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
FAC that may interest you. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 16:29, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
This photo Bronzewar.jpg is captioned "The en:Bronze Horseman camouflaged from the German aircraft during the en:Siege of Leningrad, en:August 8, en:1941" and is used and similarly captioned in Bronze Horseman. I think 'camouflaged' is wrong and should be 'protected' or similar word. The statue is not meant to be hidden but protected. Camouflage is meant to blend with the surrounding and background which is not the case. GS3 ( talk) 00:11, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Sure. Done.— Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • ( yo?); 17:36, February 17, 2009 (UTC)
Oh for the love of chicken! I don't know what part of the MOS requires that these images be unstacked, but you've created an unsightly gap in the article for no discernible purpose. The second image is not discussed in the article, so why do you persist? Is there something in the MOS that prevents what I did? Must you be so possessive and anti-social? -- Y not? 22:22, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Likhachev.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle ( talk) 17:02, 25 February 2009 (UTC)