![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
This user has a history of blanking celebrity bio pages and replacing them with profanity, or insults. Recently, he he slipped profanity into the Dane Cook page.
Special:Contributions/71.113.165.18
And the relevant WHOIS page. [1]
Thanks, - Kingoomieiii ( talk) 20:10, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Highways 2/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Highways 2/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, — Coren (talk) 22:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Mercury has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Happy New Year! Here is the latest edition of the WikiProject GA Newsletter! Dr. Cash ( talk) 04:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hey. I understand why you would like to keep WP:Ogg protected, but can you not semi-protect it instead? Us normal users now can't even do minor edits.-- Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves talk / contribs (join WP:PT) 05:46, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Has agreed to stop being disruptive. What are your thoughts on unblocking. Viridae Talk 01:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello Krimpet, I just wanted to say thank you for blocking Alfred Legrand. I would have done it earlier, but I was concerned that I had been in a dispute with this user over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. S. Wenocur, and blocking may have been abusive on my part. Thanks. Acalamari 17:28, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
I was reading your userpage and put your committed identity hash into an online ROT13 translator. I laughed. Great one. hbdragon88 ( talk) 02:31, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello Krimpet, I made these changes to your Ch2 importer to make it work on Safari. The changes are based on the importScript() function used in MediaWiki:Common.js The bug i was experiencing with the document.write() is that Safari (and the ecma spec as a matter of fact) do not guarantee where in the document you are writing. With Safari 3's multithreaded JS loading this means that sometimes stuff ends up randomly in the HTML. :( The DHMTL method of importScript seems to work with all major browsers. P.S. also made it load only when on the "Image" namespace. -- TheDJ ( talk • contribs) 19:37, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Why did you delete http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Log&page=Image:Greg_Luzinski_with_young_fan.jpg ?
It says "user request". Which user? If it was the uploader, then that makes sense. Greg at WR requested at WR that it be deleted. Is it deleted because Greg talked the uploader into the request? At WR they are acting like any image of a child uploaded under a copyleft copyright is immoral because it can be altered and used for evil purposes. Which is nonsense and an attempt to throw sand in the gears of Wikipedia and the free culture movement. WAS 4.250 ( talk) 10:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey, Krimpet. The St. Louis signer is back again. I had another admin ( User:TwinsMetsFan) block the range, but the user seems to have shifted to a different range, and TMF doesn't know how to determine ranges. The newest IP is 24.217.225.187. Thanks a lot for your continuing help. — Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 04:34, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
|
Thanks for your support at my
request for adminship, which passed
today with 42/0/0!
I would like to thank Wizardman for nominating me, Fran Rogers/Archive 7 and everyone else for their support and comments. I'll continue with contributing to the encyclopedia's content (hopefully writing an FA here and there :) and will help out with admin-related tasks which you just entrusted me with. If you need any help, don't hesitate to ask! Thanks again, —dima /talk/ 01:50, 26 January 2008 (UTC) |
![]() |
Thanks for participating in my RfA! | |
Although it failed 43/27/0, I'm happy because the outcome has been very helpful in many meaningful ways. Your support and remarks contributed so much to this. If you followed my RfA you know what happened. Most of the editors who posted opposing opinions have never edited with me. Some articles I edit deal with controversial topics and with respect to a very few of these, editors who didn't know much about me had some worries about confrontational editing and civility. Since I support their high standards I can easily (and will gladly) address this. The support and ecouragement to run again soon has been wonderful, thanks again. Cheers! Gwen Gale ( talk) 05:28, 26 January 2008 (UTC) |
Hey Krimpet, I just wanted to give you a quick thank you for your support at
my RFA. I was taken back by the amount of support I received and will work hard to live up to the community's expectations. If you ever need any help or have a question, feel free to come and ask! Thanks again!
Gonzo fan2007
talk ♦
contribs
18:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Because the WP:AN discussion has been resolved, I have deleted this page, per the intention you stated when undeleting it that this was temporary. Feel free to refactor this action if there is any sort of misunderstanding. Jehochman Talk 20:47, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
My effort to regain adminship was unsuccessful, But I wanted to thank you for taking some time out of your day to voice your opinion.-- MONGO 19:16, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
It appears your closure of the DRV was overturned. You may want to review the actions taken there and consider giving your input. ~Kylu ( u| t) 19:44, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi
Pls find below the content I would like to write an article on Fiorano Software and everytime I write I get it blocked.
Pls find below the article and suggest,
Fiorano Software
Fiorano Software Inc. is a software company, with headquarters in Los Gatos, California. Fiorano sells business integration software.
History Atul Saini founded the company as Modena Software in 1995 with the vision of bringing an architectural revolution in the realm of business integration.
One of the first entrepreneurs to realize the power of Java and JMS, Mr. Saini led Fiorano to become the first company to release a commercial Java product based on Sun Microsystem's Java Message Service in 1998. Today Fiorano's messaging product, FioranoMQ, is the acknowledged leading Java messaging server in the high growth messaging middleware market.
Mr. Saini has over 15 years of experience in the software industry. He has been a contributing member of the C++ Standards Committee and published an authoritative work on the subject "C++ Programming with the Standard Template Library" (Addison Wesley). Prior to founding Fiorano, Mr. Saini founded Modena Software Inc. which is a leading provider of C++ and Java Test Suites and Libraries. Prior to that, Mr. Saini led compiler development at HAL Computer Systems which was later acquired by Fujitsu of Japan. Mr. Saini holds a Master of Science degree in Computer Science from Indiana University in Bloomington, Indiana, and a Bachelor of Science degree in Computer Science from the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) at Madras. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Editorarshi ( talk • contribs) 07:19, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello,
I took and uploaded the photo at the above location and noticed today that the history now claims the photo was taken by someone else. I was poking around the discussion logs and noticed that you had deleted the picture at some point? http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Log&page=Image:Mont_St_Michel_with_sheep.jpg May I ask why? And may I ask your help in fixing the attribution problem. I've tagged the image with copyvio on commons but am not really sure what to proceed. This was my first image contribution (I only know the guidelines for text contributions and vios).
Thanks! Janet13 ( talk) 07:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
As a note Image:MontSTMichelfromtheparkinglot.JPG which was used on the same article, was also deleted from commons. perhaps a similar issue ? -- TheDJ ( talk • contribs) 17:12, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for doing that :) - Alison ❤ 16:10, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Something needed to be done - he's been given chance after chance to stop soapboxing, yet he only decided to escalate things :/ Now, about my sudden urge to join the Navy... krimpet ✽ 20:01, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
heh, love the pic...thanks! I was at my wits end (I had a copy of that poster on my barracks room wall when I was *in* the USN too!)... Legotech ( talk) 00:25, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't want to bother you, but I'm just making sure you see the note I left at User_talk:Krimpet/CommonsHelper_Helper#Bug. There's a slight bug in the latest CH2 code, which causes it not to load in my Firefox 2.0. It worked before the 1/24 change. Thanks again for the great script. Superm401 - Talk 07:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
The February 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash ( talk) 05:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hi Krimpet,
I noticed that The Teacher has been protected since last July because of edit warring. As I am not an administrator, I was hoping to convince you that the page should be either be redirected to Leigh Teabing or Teacher. Teacher (disambiguation) currently holds the same office as The Teacher, and does so with a more appropriate title. The only article I know of currently on Wikipedia that is known as "the teacher" rather than simply "teacher" is Leigh Teabing. If the spoiler aspect of this type of redirect is generally considered inappropriate, a redirect to Teacher is preferable over a duplicate disambiguation page. Leigh Teabing can then be listed on Teacher (disambiguation).
Neelix ( talk) 23:11, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I notice you deleted the version here on English Wikipedia of Image:Panorama of Humbug with Jenny Lind.jpg. PLEASE take second to check images on Commons before deleting versions here. The version here had a detailed description and information on author, and source-- NONE of which were listed at Commons. The version on Commons merely made referece to en:Wikipedia as the source (bad practice by the uploader there). I've taken care of copying the info from the deleted version on to Commons for this one. Thank you for your attention to prevent more of this sort of thing. Cheers, -- Infrogmation ( talk) 18:41, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Are you using or have you used a script to delete images? I'm asking in relation to the deletion log here. Hiding T 19:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
You blocked the above user indefinitely for disruption, but he is requesting to be unblocked. Your comments would be appreciated on his talk page. Thanks, - auburnpilot talk 20:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Just trying to point this out at you one last time :D There is still one bug left in the script by the return statement that is not actually in a function. User_talk:Krimpet/CommonsHelper_Helper#Bug -- TheDJ ( talk • contribs) 21:19, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
I recommend unblocking. He says he's the same as
User:John5Russell3Finley. His log
first edit shows he created the newer account after forgetting his password. His old userpages match. Most telling, his deleted contributions for both accounts line up on the
History of West Eurasia article.
It is possible that he is nevertheless User:MyWikiBiz but I think that if in doubt we should give him the benefit of the doubt. If I'm wrong, well mostly MyWikiBiz has been a minor irritant, not a big problem, in the last few months. I think it's better to live with the risk of a low-level MyWikiBiz presence here than to lose a productive editor. In any event, if this is MyWikiBiz, blocking won't stop his creation of a new sockpuppet. (Another observation -- many of his socks have been anagrams of something else but I'm not sure this user name is).
mywikibiz.com has slowly been adding content to its wiki; we'll probably see regular editors add more of their links over time. We've had a couple of regular editors also establish accounts over there.
Finally, it may be possible to check user both John Russ Finley accounts if the John5Russell3Finley data has not already been ditched.
Thanks for looking into this. -- A. B. (talk) 20:06, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Krimet - that image was very NSFW :( Viridae Talk 03:59, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Please do not tag editors with histories going back one and two years respectively; the CheckUser came back inconclusive and was registered by a CheckUser blocked sockpuppet of a banned user. Feel free to post on the talk pages that the CheckUser is in process, but tagging editors on the basis of an allegation made by a banned user with a history of paranoid abuse is a seriously bad idea - even if it were right. Note that if it is proven, several people will be upset, angry and extremely disappointed. Sensitive handling is called for. Guy ( Help!) 18:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
I realize that this account's recent image-related vandalism of Muhammad was utterly despicable, but the account has a history of constructive edits prior to this incident. Would you object to reducing your indefinite block to a one day one? I think that would still send the message that bigoted behavior is not allowed in any form on Wikipedia, while offering the account holder another chance to contribute productively. Regards, ˉˉ anetode ╦╩ 03:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
I don't see anywhere near the level of disruption there to justify an insta-block...
I'm going to respond on ANI, but I am strongly inclined to grant the unblock request on his talk page. This is overreaction. Nobody's done anything like enough good-faith discussion / work to see if he can be a positive article space contributor, or if his edits are sufficiently disruptive. Georgewilliamherbert ( talk) 04:57, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Could you help this user out or comment on his autoblock? It's not immediately apparent to me why his IP needs to be blocked as abusive open proxy. Sandstein ( talk) 14:27, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Your offer for help is thankfully accepted. Your CommonsHelperHelper: I don't have a userscript page yet. Do I just create this on Wp for instance? Just type in title user:Name/userscipttitleyourecommended and save? I think I'll manage from then on. Thanks LouisBB ( talk) 20:24, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
I think it might be time to reevaluate whether this user should have access to rollback. I'm seeing a lot of complaints on their talk page about invalid reverts. Pairadox ( talk) 22:56, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
|
I think it might be time to reevaluate whether this user should have access to rollback. I'm seeing a lot of complaints on their talk page about invalid reverts. Pairadox ( talk) 22:56, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
|
What exactly are you calling "edit warring" on this article? -- tariqabjotu 07:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
My point was that RFCs are supposed to be about the dispute, and I see nothing about it in the RFC. Nor do I see a RFC being certified by people actually being in dispute with the user. What I do see is people interpreting 'being in dispute' as being the mere act of alleging improper behavior which the accused disagrees with. This is, I feel, what the intention of requiring certification was exactly to avoid: problems being brought up by third parties not actually involved in the situation.
I don't see SirFozzie and Durova as legitimately involved in any dispute with Mantanmoreland or Samiharris - or if they are, it's not even discussed in the RFC. Matthew Brown (Morven) ( T: C) 05:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. A new user posted this comment, mentioning your name. I already left a message on his talk page, directing him to WP:AGF, but since it regards you directly, I thought you might want to know. Regards, Tiamut talk 15:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi there - can you tell me why you consider or are certain that 129.7.146.249 ( talk · contribs) is a sock? He is asking to be unblocked and I am tending to agree with that request - but if you could provide your evidence that will help me make a clear decision. Thank you.-- VS talk 23:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
You might want to put a header or something on the CFD to let people know a deletion review has already been opened on this one. I've never closed a CFD before and don't know how it's done. -- Veritas ( talk) 04:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
![]() ![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence
I hereby award you this barnstar in recognition of a combination of extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service particularly in dealing with the removal of pointy categories. -- Cat chi? 04:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC) |
Hi there. While 76.30.98.149 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) is pretty clearly both a troll and the same user as No Oven For Me ( talk · contribs), 1948remembered ( talk · contribs), etc, I'm not sure that we should indefinitely block the IP (since it might be reassigned at some point). What do you think about shortening the block to 1 month or so? MastCell Talk 04:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Mantanmoreland/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Mantanmoreland/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, — Rlevse • Talk • 23:07, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
|
Hi, I saw your post on my discussion page and figured you would be the person to contact about this. Should I file some sort of complaint about this person stealing my identity ? or maybe ask that maybe somewhere something get posted or deleted or something ? I did post a MSG on my discussion page denying that I was the same as John Russ Finley. Not real clear what the person's purpose was...I know I was taking a break, and am still none too sure that I'm all that happy, though I am still willing to try to maintain the articles I have already posted. Any assistance or input appreciated. John5Russell3Finley ( talk) 20:59, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi! I saw that you worked on OTRS Ticket#: 2008020110012458". I have worked on wiki on and off for three years and have never seen an OTRS before, I found the wiki page on OTRS, and its links, but found most of it procedural (like who can work on them) and not substantive. Is an OTRS a request from a person to remove their own wiki page? I thought the subject of a page could not have final say over whether a page exists for that person. Any guideline pages or a quick paragraph explanation would be appreciated.-- Jayrav ( talk) 20:52, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
hihi
I don't know where to go for help...tried the IRC channel and there seemed to be some heated bot related argument going on and I couldn't get anyone's attention :)
Anyway... If you check out the edit summaries on this guy: [ [5]] you can start to see the problem...then if you go a little deeper: [ [6]] Anyway, is there a warning or something I can put on his talk page? I know its an IP, but it seems pretty stable...perhaps a couple of people, one vandalizing strange articles and this guy who seems to be pretty steady on the dino stuff? Anyway...help? THANKS! (Oh, have you seen the latest on Tedius Z's page? he's "undecided" about getting unblocked:) Legotech ( talk) 00:39, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
You deleted this image without ensuring that either the description or the attribution had been preserved on Commons. Please fix it. Dragons flight ( talk) 18:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the
userpage of another user may be considered
vandalism. Specifically, your edit to
User:Animum/monobook.css may be offensive or unwelcome. If you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use
the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Take a look at our
introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. You had me worried! >:-I —
Animum (
talk)
17:10, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
This user has a history of blanking celebrity bio pages and replacing them with profanity, or insults. Recently, he he slipped profanity into the Dane Cook page.
Special:Contributions/71.113.165.18
And the relevant WHOIS page. [1]
Thanks, - Kingoomieiii ( talk) 20:10, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Highways 2/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Highways 2/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, — Coren (talk) 22:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Mercury has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Happy New Year! Here is the latest edition of the WikiProject GA Newsletter! Dr. Cash ( talk) 04:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hey. I understand why you would like to keep WP:Ogg protected, but can you not semi-protect it instead? Us normal users now can't even do minor edits.-- Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves talk / contribs (join WP:PT) 05:46, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Has agreed to stop being disruptive. What are your thoughts on unblocking. Viridae Talk 01:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello Krimpet, I just wanted to say thank you for blocking Alfred Legrand. I would have done it earlier, but I was concerned that I had been in a dispute with this user over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. S. Wenocur, and blocking may have been abusive on my part. Thanks. Acalamari 17:28, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
I was reading your userpage and put your committed identity hash into an online ROT13 translator. I laughed. Great one. hbdragon88 ( talk) 02:31, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello Krimpet, I made these changes to your Ch2 importer to make it work on Safari. The changes are based on the importScript() function used in MediaWiki:Common.js The bug i was experiencing with the document.write() is that Safari (and the ecma spec as a matter of fact) do not guarantee where in the document you are writing. With Safari 3's multithreaded JS loading this means that sometimes stuff ends up randomly in the HTML. :( The DHMTL method of importScript seems to work with all major browsers. P.S. also made it load only when on the "Image" namespace. -- TheDJ ( talk • contribs) 19:37, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Why did you delete http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Log&page=Image:Greg_Luzinski_with_young_fan.jpg ?
It says "user request". Which user? If it was the uploader, then that makes sense. Greg at WR requested at WR that it be deleted. Is it deleted because Greg talked the uploader into the request? At WR they are acting like any image of a child uploaded under a copyleft copyright is immoral because it can be altered and used for evil purposes. Which is nonsense and an attempt to throw sand in the gears of Wikipedia and the free culture movement. WAS 4.250 ( talk) 10:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey, Krimpet. The St. Louis signer is back again. I had another admin ( User:TwinsMetsFan) block the range, but the user seems to have shifted to a different range, and TMF doesn't know how to determine ranges. The newest IP is 24.217.225.187. Thanks a lot for your continuing help. — Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 04:34, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
|
Thanks for your support at my
request for adminship, which passed
today with 42/0/0!
I would like to thank Wizardman for nominating me, Fran Rogers/Archive 7 and everyone else for their support and comments. I'll continue with contributing to the encyclopedia's content (hopefully writing an FA here and there :) and will help out with admin-related tasks which you just entrusted me with. If you need any help, don't hesitate to ask! Thanks again, —dima /talk/ 01:50, 26 January 2008 (UTC) |
![]() |
Thanks for participating in my RfA! | |
Although it failed 43/27/0, I'm happy because the outcome has been very helpful in many meaningful ways. Your support and remarks contributed so much to this. If you followed my RfA you know what happened. Most of the editors who posted opposing opinions have never edited with me. Some articles I edit deal with controversial topics and with respect to a very few of these, editors who didn't know much about me had some worries about confrontational editing and civility. Since I support their high standards I can easily (and will gladly) address this. The support and ecouragement to run again soon has been wonderful, thanks again. Cheers! Gwen Gale ( talk) 05:28, 26 January 2008 (UTC) |
Hey Krimpet, I just wanted to give you a quick thank you for your support at
my RFA. I was taken back by the amount of support I received and will work hard to live up to the community's expectations. If you ever need any help or have a question, feel free to come and ask! Thanks again!
Gonzo fan2007
talk ♦
contribs
18:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Because the WP:AN discussion has been resolved, I have deleted this page, per the intention you stated when undeleting it that this was temporary. Feel free to refactor this action if there is any sort of misunderstanding. Jehochman Talk 20:47, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
My effort to regain adminship was unsuccessful, But I wanted to thank you for taking some time out of your day to voice your opinion.-- MONGO 19:16, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
It appears your closure of the DRV was overturned. You may want to review the actions taken there and consider giving your input. ~Kylu ( u| t) 19:44, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi
Pls find below the content I would like to write an article on Fiorano Software and everytime I write I get it blocked.
Pls find below the article and suggest,
Fiorano Software
Fiorano Software Inc. is a software company, with headquarters in Los Gatos, California. Fiorano sells business integration software.
History Atul Saini founded the company as Modena Software in 1995 with the vision of bringing an architectural revolution in the realm of business integration.
One of the first entrepreneurs to realize the power of Java and JMS, Mr. Saini led Fiorano to become the first company to release a commercial Java product based on Sun Microsystem's Java Message Service in 1998. Today Fiorano's messaging product, FioranoMQ, is the acknowledged leading Java messaging server in the high growth messaging middleware market.
Mr. Saini has over 15 years of experience in the software industry. He has been a contributing member of the C++ Standards Committee and published an authoritative work on the subject "C++ Programming with the Standard Template Library" (Addison Wesley). Prior to founding Fiorano, Mr. Saini founded Modena Software Inc. which is a leading provider of C++ and Java Test Suites and Libraries. Prior to that, Mr. Saini led compiler development at HAL Computer Systems which was later acquired by Fujitsu of Japan. Mr. Saini holds a Master of Science degree in Computer Science from Indiana University in Bloomington, Indiana, and a Bachelor of Science degree in Computer Science from the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) at Madras. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Editorarshi ( talk • contribs) 07:19, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello,
I took and uploaded the photo at the above location and noticed today that the history now claims the photo was taken by someone else. I was poking around the discussion logs and noticed that you had deleted the picture at some point? http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Log&page=Image:Mont_St_Michel_with_sheep.jpg May I ask why? And may I ask your help in fixing the attribution problem. I've tagged the image with copyvio on commons but am not really sure what to proceed. This was my first image contribution (I only know the guidelines for text contributions and vios).
Thanks! Janet13 ( talk) 07:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
As a note Image:MontSTMichelfromtheparkinglot.JPG which was used on the same article, was also deleted from commons. perhaps a similar issue ? -- TheDJ ( talk • contribs) 17:12, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for doing that :) - Alison ❤ 16:10, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Something needed to be done - he's been given chance after chance to stop soapboxing, yet he only decided to escalate things :/ Now, about my sudden urge to join the Navy... krimpet ✽ 20:01, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
heh, love the pic...thanks! I was at my wits end (I had a copy of that poster on my barracks room wall when I was *in* the USN too!)... Legotech ( talk) 00:25, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't want to bother you, but I'm just making sure you see the note I left at User_talk:Krimpet/CommonsHelper_Helper#Bug. There's a slight bug in the latest CH2 code, which causes it not to load in my Firefox 2.0. It worked before the 1/24 change. Thanks again for the great script. Superm401 - Talk 07:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
The February 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash ( talk) 05:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hi Krimpet,
I noticed that The Teacher has been protected since last July because of edit warring. As I am not an administrator, I was hoping to convince you that the page should be either be redirected to Leigh Teabing or Teacher. Teacher (disambiguation) currently holds the same office as The Teacher, and does so with a more appropriate title. The only article I know of currently on Wikipedia that is known as "the teacher" rather than simply "teacher" is Leigh Teabing. If the spoiler aspect of this type of redirect is generally considered inappropriate, a redirect to Teacher is preferable over a duplicate disambiguation page. Leigh Teabing can then be listed on Teacher (disambiguation).
Neelix ( talk) 23:11, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I notice you deleted the version here on English Wikipedia of Image:Panorama of Humbug with Jenny Lind.jpg. PLEASE take second to check images on Commons before deleting versions here. The version here had a detailed description and information on author, and source-- NONE of which were listed at Commons. The version on Commons merely made referece to en:Wikipedia as the source (bad practice by the uploader there). I've taken care of copying the info from the deleted version on to Commons for this one. Thank you for your attention to prevent more of this sort of thing. Cheers, -- Infrogmation ( talk) 18:41, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Are you using or have you used a script to delete images? I'm asking in relation to the deletion log here. Hiding T 19:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
You blocked the above user indefinitely for disruption, but he is requesting to be unblocked. Your comments would be appreciated on his talk page. Thanks, - auburnpilot talk 20:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Just trying to point this out at you one last time :D There is still one bug left in the script by the return statement that is not actually in a function. User_talk:Krimpet/CommonsHelper_Helper#Bug -- TheDJ ( talk • contribs) 21:19, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
I recommend unblocking. He says he's the same as
User:John5Russell3Finley. His log
first edit shows he created the newer account after forgetting his password. His old userpages match. Most telling, his deleted contributions for both accounts line up on the
History of West Eurasia article.
It is possible that he is nevertheless User:MyWikiBiz but I think that if in doubt we should give him the benefit of the doubt. If I'm wrong, well mostly MyWikiBiz has been a minor irritant, not a big problem, in the last few months. I think it's better to live with the risk of a low-level MyWikiBiz presence here than to lose a productive editor. In any event, if this is MyWikiBiz, blocking won't stop his creation of a new sockpuppet. (Another observation -- many of his socks have been anagrams of something else but I'm not sure this user name is).
mywikibiz.com has slowly been adding content to its wiki; we'll probably see regular editors add more of their links over time. We've had a couple of regular editors also establish accounts over there.
Finally, it may be possible to check user both John Russ Finley accounts if the John5Russell3Finley data has not already been ditched.
Thanks for looking into this. -- A. B. (talk) 20:06, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Krimet - that image was very NSFW :( Viridae Talk 03:59, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Please do not tag editors with histories going back one and two years respectively; the CheckUser came back inconclusive and was registered by a CheckUser blocked sockpuppet of a banned user. Feel free to post on the talk pages that the CheckUser is in process, but tagging editors on the basis of an allegation made by a banned user with a history of paranoid abuse is a seriously bad idea - even if it were right. Note that if it is proven, several people will be upset, angry and extremely disappointed. Sensitive handling is called for. Guy ( Help!) 18:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
I realize that this account's recent image-related vandalism of Muhammad was utterly despicable, but the account has a history of constructive edits prior to this incident. Would you object to reducing your indefinite block to a one day one? I think that would still send the message that bigoted behavior is not allowed in any form on Wikipedia, while offering the account holder another chance to contribute productively. Regards, ˉˉ anetode ╦╩ 03:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
I don't see anywhere near the level of disruption there to justify an insta-block...
I'm going to respond on ANI, but I am strongly inclined to grant the unblock request on his talk page. This is overreaction. Nobody's done anything like enough good-faith discussion / work to see if he can be a positive article space contributor, or if his edits are sufficiently disruptive. Georgewilliamherbert ( talk) 04:57, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Could you help this user out or comment on his autoblock? It's not immediately apparent to me why his IP needs to be blocked as abusive open proxy. Sandstein ( talk) 14:27, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Your offer for help is thankfully accepted. Your CommonsHelperHelper: I don't have a userscript page yet. Do I just create this on Wp for instance? Just type in title user:Name/userscipttitleyourecommended and save? I think I'll manage from then on. Thanks LouisBB ( talk) 20:24, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
I think it might be time to reevaluate whether this user should have access to rollback. I'm seeing a lot of complaints on their talk page about invalid reverts. Pairadox ( talk) 22:56, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
|
I think it might be time to reevaluate whether this user should have access to rollback. I'm seeing a lot of complaints on their talk page about invalid reverts. Pairadox ( talk) 22:56, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
|
What exactly are you calling "edit warring" on this article? -- tariqabjotu 07:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
My point was that RFCs are supposed to be about the dispute, and I see nothing about it in the RFC. Nor do I see a RFC being certified by people actually being in dispute with the user. What I do see is people interpreting 'being in dispute' as being the mere act of alleging improper behavior which the accused disagrees with. This is, I feel, what the intention of requiring certification was exactly to avoid: problems being brought up by third parties not actually involved in the situation.
I don't see SirFozzie and Durova as legitimately involved in any dispute with Mantanmoreland or Samiharris - or if they are, it's not even discussed in the RFC. Matthew Brown (Morven) ( T: C) 05:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. A new user posted this comment, mentioning your name. I already left a message on his talk page, directing him to WP:AGF, but since it regards you directly, I thought you might want to know. Regards, Tiamut talk 15:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi there - can you tell me why you consider or are certain that 129.7.146.249 ( talk · contribs) is a sock? He is asking to be unblocked and I am tending to agree with that request - but if you could provide your evidence that will help me make a clear decision. Thank you.-- VS talk 23:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
You might want to put a header or something on the CFD to let people know a deletion review has already been opened on this one. I've never closed a CFD before and don't know how it's done. -- Veritas ( talk) 04:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
![]() ![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence
I hereby award you this barnstar in recognition of a combination of extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service particularly in dealing with the removal of pointy categories. -- Cat chi? 04:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC) |
Hi there. While 76.30.98.149 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) is pretty clearly both a troll and the same user as No Oven For Me ( talk · contribs), 1948remembered ( talk · contribs), etc, I'm not sure that we should indefinitely block the IP (since it might be reassigned at some point). What do you think about shortening the block to 1 month or so? MastCell Talk 04:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Mantanmoreland/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Mantanmoreland/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, — Rlevse • Talk • 23:07, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
|
Hi, I saw your post on my discussion page and figured you would be the person to contact about this. Should I file some sort of complaint about this person stealing my identity ? or maybe ask that maybe somewhere something get posted or deleted or something ? I did post a MSG on my discussion page denying that I was the same as John Russ Finley. Not real clear what the person's purpose was...I know I was taking a break, and am still none too sure that I'm all that happy, though I am still willing to try to maintain the articles I have already posted. Any assistance or input appreciated. John5Russell3Finley ( talk) 20:59, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi! I saw that you worked on OTRS Ticket#: 2008020110012458". I have worked on wiki on and off for three years and have never seen an OTRS before, I found the wiki page on OTRS, and its links, but found most of it procedural (like who can work on them) and not substantive. Is an OTRS a request from a person to remove their own wiki page? I thought the subject of a page could not have final say over whether a page exists for that person. Any guideline pages or a quick paragraph explanation would be appreciated.-- Jayrav ( talk) 20:52, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
hihi
I don't know where to go for help...tried the IRC channel and there seemed to be some heated bot related argument going on and I couldn't get anyone's attention :)
Anyway... If you check out the edit summaries on this guy: [ [5]] you can start to see the problem...then if you go a little deeper: [ [6]] Anyway, is there a warning or something I can put on his talk page? I know its an IP, but it seems pretty stable...perhaps a couple of people, one vandalizing strange articles and this guy who seems to be pretty steady on the dino stuff? Anyway...help? THANKS! (Oh, have you seen the latest on Tedius Z's page? he's "undecided" about getting unblocked:) Legotech ( talk) 00:39, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
You deleted this image without ensuring that either the description or the attribution had been preserved on Commons. Please fix it. Dragons flight ( talk) 18:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the
userpage of another user may be considered
vandalism. Specifically, your edit to
User:Animum/monobook.css may be offensive or unwelcome. If you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use
the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Take a look at our
introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. You had me worried! >:-I —
Animum (
talk)
17:10, 17 February 2008 (UTC)