![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Walt Disney Animation Studios you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Forbidden User --
Forbidden User (
talk)
18:40, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
The article
Walt Disney Animation Studios you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Walt Disney Animation Studios for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Forbidden User --
Forbidden User (
talk)
19:01, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
I reverted your edits, the article needs to go through the good article nomination process before passing or failing good article status. You can not decided whether an article is a good article without a proper nomination by an independent user. Don't do that again. Secret account 19:06, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Ah, one more thing, I noticed that most of your edits lied under the scope of WikiProject Film and WikiProject Disney. A WikiProject is a group of contributors that band together to improve coverage of a certain topic or to complete a certain task on Wikipedia. If you are interested, you may add your name to the list of members on the projects' page, and view its to-do-list. I hope you consider it, and welcome to Wikipedia! ALittle Quenhi ( talk to me) 10:07, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Well, there are special tracking systems that they may use, like Nielsen SoundScan for digital singles and albums, etc. The 3,000,000 figure is not stated in the source, but it can easily be inferred from since the song has received the 3x Platinum certification from RIAA (stated officially on its site), and all 3x Platinum-certified single/album must have reached 3,000,000 copies milestone. Feel free to discuss with me. Happy editing! ALittle Quenhi ( talk to me) 09:23, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
What with the Disney nomination close to archiving, please take my advice and open a peer review for Disney rather than just list it again at FAC. A peer review will iron out all the problems and issues that the article may have and will make life a lot easier at FAC should you (or whoever) choose to re-nominate it. Cassianto talk 18:00, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Forbidden User! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
You are going to be reverted by the bot. You need to leave a note in the talk page note parameter of the nomination.-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:31, 18 May 2014 (UTC) Thanks. Forbidden User ( talk) 14:45, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Frozen (2013 film) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Prashant! --
Prashant! (
talk)
06:41, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Regarding your removal of the few links on Thu 22 May I personally felt that iMDB is a pretty reliable site that is often used on articles. I did not do any reverts etc but I do hope you reconsider iMDB as an external link. Thank you! :) Lesmiserables95 ( talk) 16:19, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
If you say so then, although I often see it on wiki links. :) Guess we have some cleaning up to do on that! ;) And yes the flu cough combination is irritating, but thank you for the well wishes. Have a nice day! Lesmiserables95 ( talk) 23:10, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Sorry for undoing your edits again. I know IMDb (and many other sites) is not reliable, since anyone can edit it, just like this Wikipedia. But we just link to it and say, "OK guys, I give you a number of links for references, but it's your choice how to use it." LOL Anyway, these links are already kind of "templates" for articles about films, so it's best we shouldn't break the accepted rule, OK? ALittle Quenhi ( talk to me) 01:18, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
I have no problems with both versions, considering how each has it's own justification. But Quenhitran has a pretty valid point that this is like a standard template for film articles. Till then, it's been a pleasure. :) Lesmiserables95 ( talk) 03:39, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Well, I think wikipedia policy/guideline has listed this. So it's fine you add them back. By the way, Lesmiserables95, I think you got the wrong guy? It's unimportant though. Forbidden User ( talk) 04:26, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Not actually sure what you mean by the wrong guy... but I'm sure it's not anything too important. :) Lesmiserables95 ( talk) 04:42, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Hope you don't mind my last reverting. Oops, sorry!
I'm happy that you've expressed your concerns about unreliable sources. And I'd like to discuss a bit about your recent removal. First, as far as I know, Box Office Mojo is a subsidiary of IMDb, both of which were owned by IMDb.com (IMDb.com were purchased by Amazon.com in 2008). Therefore, listing IMDb as "Publisher" and Box Office Mojo as "Work" is possible, and I've seen articles using this way of citation.
And one more thing, about Frozen Free Fall. I was the one who added this piece in the end of December 2013. Gamezebo.com is a professional rating sites that give reviews on newly released games quite regularly - it could be considered a reliable source (The "Reception" section of several articles about games cite Zebo). And in case you worry having two citations constitutes "Citation overkill", then some information included in this piece doesn't only come from Disney Games' Official Site, but also from Gamezebo. Perhaps we should create a separate article about Free Fall some time soon.
I'd like to hear your opinions on these two issues. By the way, you are the most friendly Wikipedia editor I've ever met, of my two-year experience in this community! Feel free to post on my talk page, I'm looking forward to them! ALittle Quenhi ( talk to me) 17:55, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Forbidden User, please keep whatever you like in my recent edit, and revert the rest. I enjoyed reading through the article.
I consider "and by 1930, despite their having sound, cartoons featuring Felix had faded from the screen after failing to gain attention" at the end of Mickey Mouse section to be dubious, if not one-sided. I remember growing up with both Mickey Mouse and Felix the Cat as my idols in the late 1950's, although I watched them on TV and not on theater screens. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_g1epc/is_tov/ai_2419100434 is noted as the ref on the part, but is a dead link for me. It is very possible the statement is true, and there was a resurrection of popularity for Felix the Cat on TV in the 1950s. If so, inclusion of such statement would make the article better, and come to think of it, description of the influence of TV on Disney (start of the TV series) in the 1950s may be lacking/insufficient in the article. Yiba ( talk | contribs) 03:56, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Please don't change these as it can be important to know when they were added. Thanks. Dougweller ( talk) 16:00, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Exceptional Newcomer Award |
Though you are relatively new, you made Frozen a GA. So congratulations! Kailash29792 ( talk) 16:38, 18 June 2014 (UTC) |
The article
Frozen (2013 film) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Frozen (2013 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Prashant! --
Prashant! (
talk)
03:21, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
I understand your concern, but as you said, it's kind of normal here. For instance, on Elsa's, today I reverted one and you reverted one, so obviously it can't be counted as persistent vandalism. Anna's is less popular, since I finished pushing it to GA, there haven't been many constructive edits, I had to add it to my watchlist and most of the edits since then are reverts. The thing here is that, although most of the last 50 edits there are vandalism, they happen in quite a long period of time, in a month or so. We can only request protection for pages that are vandalized (six to eight times) in one or two days' time. You may check the revision history of the Frozen article in the days around the Academy Awards ceremony (March 2-March 3), only in such cases may we report. ALittle Quenhi ( talk to me) 11:40, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Walt Disney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucasian ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:51, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Kristoff (Disney) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 17:02, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
You should be in touch with Nannah4, he/she seems experienced in this field. ALittle Quenhi ( talk to me) 04:50, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
That's redundant. We use front cover to identify the soundtrack, not the back one. Instead, the back cover will not pass the non-free review. I assume you want to upload the back cover to present all the producers' name? You don't have to do that, just cite the CD names, its ID or whatsoever, like books. ALittle Quenhi ( talk to me) 08:22, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Walt Disney you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
SNUGGUMS --
SNUGGUMS (
talk)
23:00, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
The article
Walt Disney you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Walt Disney for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
SNUGGUMS --
SNUGGUMS (
talk)
04:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tangled, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:54, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Please see WP:OWNTALK and WP:REMOVED. With a *few* exceptions which are mostly templates, users may delete what they choose from their own talk page. Naraht ( talk) 15:17, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Well, Is Walt Disney a Republican, or not?
I'm waiting for one of two major events: the OUAT season premiere (probably late September) or they confirm the musical is actually going into production. Remember, right now, it's in development, they're apparently waiting for the songwriters to finish drafting the additional songs they need. At that point then I think it will be safe to say Frozen has matured as a franchise in its own right (because now it has real spinoff media products, not just merch) and we can sever all that content into a separate article and summarize it in the film article. -- Coolcaesar ( talk) 16:29, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
In recognition of your recent useful work on popular culture and entertainment... RomanSpa ( talk) 11:30, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
I'm going away for a few days starting tomorrow, and I can't reply swiftly to stuff. Could you help me respond to the reviewer's comments on good article nomination of Evil Queen (Disney)? Thanks, ALittle Quenhi ( talk to me) 14:07, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Walt Disney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Fe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:53, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
You've make numerous attacks on me in the RFC and you are violating numerous policies ranging from WP:POLEMIC to WP:NPA and numerous talk page guidelines when you misquote and completely misunderstand a basic argument. This serves as an additional note to the one I made in the RFC - you are using highly inflammatory and creating a hostile WP:BATTLEGROUND while continuing to attack editors. I believe you are being too emotional. At first I believed it was mere ignorance of the terminology and history, but its clear you are not a new Wikipedia editor and your stance cannot be swayed or open to rational debate. The point is to build a conversation and go through the details, and sadly it seems that your only recourse to continue defending unsupported claims is because "other editors said it so it must be true". That is illogical, irrational and just more polemic tactics. You may be doing good work in the article space, but you do not seem capable of forming a positive discussion and the talk page of the RFC is thoroughly evident of your clearly non-new status. So, what's your previous account? ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 04:42, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
You put voting is evil at the beginning, but your opinion is that it should be demoted. Would you mind if I change voting is evil to Demote to clarify your opinion? Thank you. Forbidden User ( talk) 12:40, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
The article
Walt Disney Animation Studios you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Walt Disney Animation Studios for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Zanimum --
Zanimum (
talk)
02:40, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For making Walt Disney Animation Studios a GA! Kailash29792 ( talk) 03:07, 5 August 2014 (UTC) |
![]() | On 12 August 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Walt Disney Animation Studios, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Walt Disney Animation Studios has released 53 animated features to date, from Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937) to Frozen (2013)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Walt Disney Animation Studios. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 07:22, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
The gross threat and false accusation by the one attacking me above, who has failed to defend himself. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Just to remind you, WP:POLEMIC applies to user pages. Forbidden User ( talk) 17:42, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
|
The article
Walt Disney Animation Studios you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Walt Disney Animation Studios for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Zanimum --
Zanimum (
talk)
02:42, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Please do not accuse other editors of socking and do not draw attention to the revealing of the personal information - instead promptly and quietly report it to oversight so it can be removed from the record. You are not new to Wikipedia, but I doubt you understand the policies and procedures. The information has now been suppressed. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 19:49, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
P.S. Voting with multiple accounts without disclosure is socking. If anyone seeing this finds out that you've unintentionally dup voted, just strike one and make a short explanation, and/or replace your IP with your signature (~~~~). It won't be considered socking. Forbidden User ( talk) 11:33, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
Evil Queen (Disney) has been promoted as a good article, a significant portion of the process was done by you. Thanks a lot! ALittle Quenhi ( talk to me) 03:59, 20 August 2014 (UTC) |
Hi Forbidden. Remember how I said that I would do that merge between group dynamics and group behavior this month? Well it isn't going to happen. Sorry. It will happen on the 1st of September though. I am scheduling the time. Thanks for your patience. Cheers Andrew ( talk) 11:54, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Last call for opinions on RFC at Wikipedia page for page protection extension. Cheers. LawrencePrincipe ( talk) 14:09, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
I sent a request in on your behalf through the Wikipedia:Requests for oversight process. PaleAqua ( talk) 22:07, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
(Another warning) Stop removing (months old) comments from Wikipedia. Do this again and I will bring you ANI and ask that you be blocked. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 14:47, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to
Tangled: you may already know about them, but you might find
Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the
sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a
vandal when they've been previously warned. This refers to the edit you reverted by
User:Hammy23. Also, I'm aware of
WP:DTTR but the template wording is better than what I might write on my own. —
Bill W. (
Talk) (
Contrib) (User:Wtwilson3) —
13:25, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 August 25#Category:Disney_Princess. Thanks. —ALittle
Quenhi (
talk to me)
09:16, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, I didn't mean to edit war. The person who removed it said that it was already in but it wasn't so I assumed they were mistaken and put it back in. -- Morgenstern91 ( talk) 20:11, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I have seen your copy edit to the above article and I wanted to thank you for having a shot at trying to fix the troublesome sentence. Unfortunately, I don't think you've quite fixed the problem, so I've asked SchroCat to have another look at it and I have provided him with a possible solution. I have posted that solution on the peer review page and have pinged you so you can take a look and help discuss it. No obligations, obviously. Cassianto Talk 18:45, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Saw that, thank you all for making it an FA! Forbidden User ( talk) 16:33, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Forbidden User. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tangled original soundtrack.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob13 Talk 03:58, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Walt Disney Animation Studios you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Forbidden User --
Forbidden User (
talk)
18:40, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
The article
Walt Disney Animation Studios you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Walt Disney Animation Studios for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Forbidden User --
Forbidden User (
talk)
19:01, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
I reverted your edits, the article needs to go through the good article nomination process before passing or failing good article status. You can not decided whether an article is a good article without a proper nomination by an independent user. Don't do that again. Secret account 19:06, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Ah, one more thing, I noticed that most of your edits lied under the scope of WikiProject Film and WikiProject Disney. A WikiProject is a group of contributors that band together to improve coverage of a certain topic or to complete a certain task on Wikipedia. If you are interested, you may add your name to the list of members on the projects' page, and view its to-do-list. I hope you consider it, and welcome to Wikipedia! ALittle Quenhi ( talk to me) 10:07, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Well, there are special tracking systems that they may use, like Nielsen SoundScan for digital singles and albums, etc. The 3,000,000 figure is not stated in the source, but it can easily be inferred from since the song has received the 3x Platinum certification from RIAA (stated officially on its site), and all 3x Platinum-certified single/album must have reached 3,000,000 copies milestone. Feel free to discuss with me. Happy editing! ALittle Quenhi ( talk to me) 09:23, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
What with the Disney nomination close to archiving, please take my advice and open a peer review for Disney rather than just list it again at FAC. A peer review will iron out all the problems and issues that the article may have and will make life a lot easier at FAC should you (or whoever) choose to re-nominate it. Cassianto talk 18:00, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Forbidden User! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
You are going to be reverted by the bot. You need to leave a note in the talk page note parameter of the nomination.-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:31, 18 May 2014 (UTC) Thanks. Forbidden User ( talk) 14:45, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Frozen (2013 film) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Prashant! --
Prashant! (
talk)
06:41, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Regarding your removal of the few links on Thu 22 May I personally felt that iMDB is a pretty reliable site that is often used on articles. I did not do any reverts etc but I do hope you reconsider iMDB as an external link. Thank you! :) Lesmiserables95 ( talk) 16:19, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
If you say so then, although I often see it on wiki links. :) Guess we have some cleaning up to do on that! ;) And yes the flu cough combination is irritating, but thank you for the well wishes. Have a nice day! Lesmiserables95 ( talk) 23:10, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Sorry for undoing your edits again. I know IMDb (and many other sites) is not reliable, since anyone can edit it, just like this Wikipedia. But we just link to it and say, "OK guys, I give you a number of links for references, but it's your choice how to use it." LOL Anyway, these links are already kind of "templates" for articles about films, so it's best we shouldn't break the accepted rule, OK? ALittle Quenhi ( talk to me) 01:18, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
I have no problems with both versions, considering how each has it's own justification. But Quenhitran has a pretty valid point that this is like a standard template for film articles. Till then, it's been a pleasure. :) Lesmiserables95 ( talk) 03:39, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Well, I think wikipedia policy/guideline has listed this. So it's fine you add them back. By the way, Lesmiserables95, I think you got the wrong guy? It's unimportant though. Forbidden User ( talk) 04:26, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Not actually sure what you mean by the wrong guy... but I'm sure it's not anything too important. :) Lesmiserables95 ( talk) 04:42, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Hope you don't mind my last reverting. Oops, sorry!
I'm happy that you've expressed your concerns about unreliable sources. And I'd like to discuss a bit about your recent removal. First, as far as I know, Box Office Mojo is a subsidiary of IMDb, both of which were owned by IMDb.com (IMDb.com were purchased by Amazon.com in 2008). Therefore, listing IMDb as "Publisher" and Box Office Mojo as "Work" is possible, and I've seen articles using this way of citation.
And one more thing, about Frozen Free Fall. I was the one who added this piece in the end of December 2013. Gamezebo.com is a professional rating sites that give reviews on newly released games quite regularly - it could be considered a reliable source (The "Reception" section of several articles about games cite Zebo). And in case you worry having two citations constitutes "Citation overkill", then some information included in this piece doesn't only come from Disney Games' Official Site, but also from Gamezebo. Perhaps we should create a separate article about Free Fall some time soon.
I'd like to hear your opinions on these two issues. By the way, you are the most friendly Wikipedia editor I've ever met, of my two-year experience in this community! Feel free to post on my talk page, I'm looking forward to them! ALittle Quenhi ( talk to me) 17:55, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Forbidden User, please keep whatever you like in my recent edit, and revert the rest. I enjoyed reading through the article.
I consider "and by 1930, despite their having sound, cartoons featuring Felix had faded from the screen after failing to gain attention" at the end of Mickey Mouse section to be dubious, if not one-sided. I remember growing up with both Mickey Mouse and Felix the Cat as my idols in the late 1950's, although I watched them on TV and not on theater screens. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_g1epc/is_tov/ai_2419100434 is noted as the ref on the part, but is a dead link for me. It is very possible the statement is true, and there was a resurrection of popularity for Felix the Cat on TV in the 1950s. If so, inclusion of such statement would make the article better, and come to think of it, description of the influence of TV on Disney (start of the TV series) in the 1950s may be lacking/insufficient in the article. Yiba ( talk | contribs) 03:56, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Please don't change these as it can be important to know when they were added. Thanks. Dougweller ( talk) 16:00, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Exceptional Newcomer Award |
Though you are relatively new, you made Frozen a GA. So congratulations! Kailash29792 ( talk) 16:38, 18 June 2014 (UTC) |
The article
Frozen (2013 film) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Frozen (2013 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Prashant! --
Prashant! (
talk)
03:21, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
I understand your concern, but as you said, it's kind of normal here. For instance, on Elsa's, today I reverted one and you reverted one, so obviously it can't be counted as persistent vandalism. Anna's is less popular, since I finished pushing it to GA, there haven't been many constructive edits, I had to add it to my watchlist and most of the edits since then are reverts. The thing here is that, although most of the last 50 edits there are vandalism, they happen in quite a long period of time, in a month or so. We can only request protection for pages that are vandalized (six to eight times) in one or two days' time. You may check the revision history of the Frozen article in the days around the Academy Awards ceremony (March 2-March 3), only in such cases may we report. ALittle Quenhi ( talk to me) 11:40, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Walt Disney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucasian ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:51, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Kristoff (Disney) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 17:02, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
You should be in touch with Nannah4, he/she seems experienced in this field. ALittle Quenhi ( talk to me) 04:50, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
That's redundant. We use front cover to identify the soundtrack, not the back one. Instead, the back cover will not pass the non-free review. I assume you want to upload the back cover to present all the producers' name? You don't have to do that, just cite the CD names, its ID or whatsoever, like books. ALittle Quenhi ( talk to me) 08:22, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Walt Disney you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
SNUGGUMS --
SNUGGUMS (
talk)
23:00, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
The article
Walt Disney you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Walt Disney for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
SNUGGUMS --
SNUGGUMS (
talk)
04:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tangled, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:54, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Please see WP:OWNTALK and WP:REMOVED. With a *few* exceptions which are mostly templates, users may delete what they choose from their own talk page. Naraht ( talk) 15:17, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Well, Is Walt Disney a Republican, or not?
I'm waiting for one of two major events: the OUAT season premiere (probably late September) or they confirm the musical is actually going into production. Remember, right now, it's in development, they're apparently waiting for the songwriters to finish drafting the additional songs they need. At that point then I think it will be safe to say Frozen has matured as a franchise in its own right (because now it has real spinoff media products, not just merch) and we can sever all that content into a separate article and summarize it in the film article. -- Coolcaesar ( talk) 16:29, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
In recognition of your recent useful work on popular culture and entertainment... RomanSpa ( talk) 11:30, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
I'm going away for a few days starting tomorrow, and I can't reply swiftly to stuff. Could you help me respond to the reviewer's comments on good article nomination of Evil Queen (Disney)? Thanks, ALittle Quenhi ( talk to me) 14:07, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Walt Disney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Fe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:53, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
You've make numerous attacks on me in the RFC and you are violating numerous policies ranging from WP:POLEMIC to WP:NPA and numerous talk page guidelines when you misquote and completely misunderstand a basic argument. This serves as an additional note to the one I made in the RFC - you are using highly inflammatory and creating a hostile WP:BATTLEGROUND while continuing to attack editors. I believe you are being too emotional. At first I believed it was mere ignorance of the terminology and history, but its clear you are not a new Wikipedia editor and your stance cannot be swayed or open to rational debate. The point is to build a conversation and go through the details, and sadly it seems that your only recourse to continue defending unsupported claims is because "other editors said it so it must be true". That is illogical, irrational and just more polemic tactics. You may be doing good work in the article space, but you do not seem capable of forming a positive discussion and the talk page of the RFC is thoroughly evident of your clearly non-new status. So, what's your previous account? ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 04:42, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
You put voting is evil at the beginning, but your opinion is that it should be demoted. Would you mind if I change voting is evil to Demote to clarify your opinion? Thank you. Forbidden User ( talk) 12:40, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
The article
Walt Disney Animation Studios you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Walt Disney Animation Studios for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Zanimum --
Zanimum (
talk)
02:40, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For making Walt Disney Animation Studios a GA! Kailash29792 ( talk) 03:07, 5 August 2014 (UTC) |
![]() | On 12 August 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Walt Disney Animation Studios, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Walt Disney Animation Studios has released 53 animated features to date, from Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937) to Frozen (2013)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Walt Disney Animation Studios. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 07:22, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
The gross threat and false accusation by the one attacking me above, who has failed to defend himself. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Just to remind you, WP:POLEMIC applies to user pages. Forbidden User ( talk) 17:42, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
|
The article
Walt Disney Animation Studios you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Walt Disney Animation Studios for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Zanimum --
Zanimum (
talk)
02:42, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Please do not accuse other editors of socking and do not draw attention to the revealing of the personal information - instead promptly and quietly report it to oversight so it can be removed from the record. You are not new to Wikipedia, but I doubt you understand the policies and procedures. The information has now been suppressed. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 19:49, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
P.S. Voting with multiple accounts without disclosure is socking. If anyone seeing this finds out that you've unintentionally dup voted, just strike one and make a short explanation, and/or replace your IP with your signature (~~~~). It won't be considered socking. Forbidden User ( talk) 11:33, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
Evil Queen (Disney) has been promoted as a good article, a significant portion of the process was done by you. Thanks a lot! ALittle Quenhi ( talk to me) 03:59, 20 August 2014 (UTC) |
Hi Forbidden. Remember how I said that I would do that merge between group dynamics and group behavior this month? Well it isn't going to happen. Sorry. It will happen on the 1st of September though. I am scheduling the time. Thanks for your patience. Cheers Andrew ( talk) 11:54, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Last call for opinions on RFC at Wikipedia page for page protection extension. Cheers. LawrencePrincipe ( talk) 14:09, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
I sent a request in on your behalf through the Wikipedia:Requests for oversight process. PaleAqua ( talk) 22:07, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
(Another warning) Stop removing (months old) comments from Wikipedia. Do this again and I will bring you ANI and ask that you be blocked. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 14:47, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to
Tangled: you may already know about them, but you might find
Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the
sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a
vandal when they've been previously warned. This refers to the edit you reverted by
User:Hammy23. Also, I'm aware of
WP:DTTR but the template wording is better than what I might write on my own. —
Bill W. (
Talk) (
Contrib) (User:Wtwilson3) —
13:25, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 August 25#Category:Disney_Princess. Thanks. —ALittle
Quenhi (
talk to me)
09:16, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, I didn't mean to edit war. The person who removed it said that it was already in but it wasn't so I assumed they were mistaken and put it back in. -- Morgenstern91 ( talk) 20:11, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I have seen your copy edit to the above article and I wanted to thank you for having a shot at trying to fix the troublesome sentence. Unfortunately, I don't think you've quite fixed the problem, so I've asked SchroCat to have another look at it and I have provided him with a possible solution. I have posted that solution on the peer review page and have pinged you so you can take a look and help discuss it. No obligations, obviously. Cassianto Talk 18:45, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Saw that, thank you all for making it an FA! Forbidden User ( talk) 16:33, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Forbidden User. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tangled original soundtrack.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob13 Talk 03:58, 19 March 2017 (UTC)