![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Welcome!
Hello, Fakescientist8000, and welcome to Wikipedia! I have noticed that you are fairly new! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I also see that some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Derek Chauvin, show an interest in the use of images and/or photos on Wikipedia.
Did you know that ...
If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
On 2 June 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Samuel E. Wright, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 23:28, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
I believe you made this edit to List of Japanese supercentenarians? Reference 40 has an error message: Cite error: The named reference nbc was invoked but never defined. Would you please take a look at it? Maybe copy the reference if it is from another Wikipedia article? If you do copy across articles, it is requested that one attribute the source. Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia See WP:PATT on how to attribute. Cheers Adakiko ( talk) 08:39, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Hm. Thanks for letting me know - I’ll get a hold on that. Fakescientist8000 ( talk) 16:41, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with
your edits to Lock-out device, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edits had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept
uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by
reliable,
verifiable (usually
secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an
inline citation, which you can learn to make
here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of
my talk page. Thanks.
Nightscream (
talk)
19:47, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Fakescientist8000! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of
Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the
edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at [[Talk:Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates]], please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 02:58, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Scott Seiss, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
scope_creep
Talk
23:06, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
With this coming from a sockpuppet, I take this with honor.
|
---|
Nikolay Zak has considered that a DNA or blood test must be made to comfirm when Jeanne Calment died. I think you shall stop claiming that Zak is a liar, he is not at all any liar, it is you who is
|
On 23 March 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Merri Dee, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 23:25, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
On 26 March 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Barrington Patterson, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – Muboshgu ( talk) 04:55, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
On 1 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ernie Carroll, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 02:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Katie talk 23:58, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
On 8 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Bruce Johnson (journalist), which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 10:45, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi, you couldn't see yourself just fixing my mistake instead of undoing it alltogether? How many ways are there to cite some article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yungkleina ( talk • contribs) 19:55, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
On 9 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article C. W. McCall, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 01:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Hey, I edited this because the title that was previously in its place has not been officially confirmed by the band or their record label. I think until this is the case, this information should be treat as false. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ernest Victory ( talk • contribs) 15:55, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
"I think until this is the case, this information should be treat as false", which would be a straight up violation of CRYSTAL. Cheers! Fake scientist 8000 16:57, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Why did you revert an edit (by me) on Sinn Féin? (Not trying to sound aggressive just curious) 78.17.143.44 ( talk) 00:29, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
For your contributions in counter-vandalism....Keep it going! Volten001 ☎ 00:04, 19 April 2022 (UTC) |
Don't do it. WP:IPSAREPEOPLETOO. 174.212.227.192 ( talk) 04:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
May I ask you that, instead of trying to ominously warn me with a red link to a supposed policy or guideline, we can have a civil discussion about it? Cheers! Fake scientist 8000 11:12, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Do not make any edit if you can’t provide reliable sources. Secondly Bawal do not come in Jaat Land. And lastly Jaats population in Bawal is almost negligible. If you want to make the changes you may provide appropriate resources or you will be reported for glorifying a particular community. Regards Ravibhooria ( talk) 11:24, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
You were in voilation of WP:NPOV, WP:UNDUE. And i had no intention to threaten you, i just wanted you to please stop the disruptive editing. Ravibhooria ( talk) 02:19, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
you will be reported for glorifying a particular community", and I also cannot see how I violated WP:NPOV and/or WP:UNDUE. Cheers! Fake scientist 8000 14:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
With this coming from a sockpuppet, I take this with honor.
|
---|
Material about living persons added to any Wikipedia page must be written with the greatest care and attention to verifiability, neutrality, and avoidance of original research. Editors must take particular care when adding information about living persons to any Wikipedia page. Such material requires a high degree of sensitivity, and must adhere strictly to all applicable laws in the United States, to this policy, and to Wikipedia's three core content policies: Neutral point of view (NPOV) Verifiability (V) No original research (NOR) We must get the article right. Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources. All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by an inline citation to a reliable, published source. Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion. The section on is poorly sourced if you actually read the article. Previous versions of the article do a better job explaining the sensitive nature but appear to be COI. the current post simply states false information after reviewing sources. GenZXY ( talk) 18:31, 22 April 2022 (UTC) |
On 23 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ali Hamsa, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 09:02, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
On 23 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Renate Holm, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Cheers. Wime Pocy 03:25, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi Fakescientist8000. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY 22:46, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 12:09, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
I noticed that you've put Better Call Saul down as one of your favorite shows and as such I saw it fit to tell you I have created these Userboxes to better display this fact
P.S. Thanks for the idea to make a Guestbook! FishandChipper ( talk) 20:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
On 29 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Salvatore Pica, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 03:28, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
On 29 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Alabo Graham-Douglas, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 20:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Please be careful with reverting edits made to someone's own user talk. Per WP:BLANKING, it's acceptable, although not great practice, to blank your own user talk. Definitely shouldn't be a rollback edit. — GFOLEY FOUR!— 23:46, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
On 4 May 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ricardo Alarcón, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 22:38, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
On 6 May 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Biancamaria Frabotta, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 09:01, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Online harassment indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 00:35, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
I'm very concerned that you chose to remove my comment with the claim (which surely isn't in good faith) that it is Grossly inappropriate; elsewhere you have claimed it violated NPOV. Not only do I not see how it's inappropriate (as it provides context to how it's different), I certainly don't see how it's grossly inappropriate. And what in that bit violates NPOV? I'm genuinely confused here - to provide context, I don't recall every touching an issue on Wikipedia relating to the Troubles ... there are surely nuances to it that I'm missing. Nfitz ( talk) 18:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
2021 Gosar-Cortez Twitter incident at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at
your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
PCN02WPS (
talk |
contribs)
04:33, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 11:27, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
On 15 May 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Randy Weaver, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 20:13, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
On 16 May 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Andrew Symonds, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – Muboshgu ( talk) 15:35, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
If you're so sure the nomination is going nowhere, what's the harm in letting it breathe for more than five minutes? What's the fear? — swpb T • go beyond • bad idea 15:36, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
"it's highly unlikely the consensus will change [from majority opposition]". Cheers! Fake scientist 8000 16:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Sorry did I make any mistakes making the page or why was the page deleted? Noogometni urejevalec ( talk) 16:22, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for the explanation Noogometni urejevalec ( talk) 16:31, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Re WP:GARAGE: Traditionally, based on etymology and underlying meaning, "neither", when distinguishing between items that are themselves singular, always takes the singular. "Neither of the bands is ..." is the same thing as "Neither band is ...", which clarifies the matter because you wouldn't write "Neither band are ...".
On the other hand, with "neither" is well as with "none", I realize actual usage gives support to the plural verb. (By its original, it has historically been "None of the bands is", because "none" = "not one": "Not one of the bands is".) And, in addition, now that I see you also restored those links that I'd removed, I realize the point is to mimic a badly written article, which might indeed have such bogus links in it. I'm surprised I didn't notice that in the first place.
So all is well, though I did want to bring the point to your attention about the traditional prescribed usage of "neither". Regards, Largoplazo ( talk) 16:11, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Fakescientist8000!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cheers!
Fake
scientist
8000
13:43, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
|
I have restored my changes to the page on Mr Turner. The article now reflects the current situation ie that all allegations against him have been dismissed. It is highly likely that the allegations were malicious and made by Labour Party politicians for their own reasons.
You may have felt that my summary was tendentious and I have altered this.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.57.253.190 ( talk) 17:08, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Please read the process for reviewing and stop outright rejecting articles that have only been submitted once unless they are obviously vandalism or otherwise qualify for speedy deletion (in which case, just tag them.) PRAXIDICAE💕 17:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Please don't unilaterally move long-standing articles out of mainspace like you did here [1]. This is disruptive and equivalent to stealth deletion. Spicy ( talk) 14:00, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 11:36, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Dear Fakescientist8000: Greetings! I am William S. Bike, and I am asking you to reconsider your rejection of my draft of a Linda Howe page for Wikipedia, and that you will allow it to be posted.
You called Ms. Howe not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. I would like to respectfully disagree with this point. Ms. Howe is the author of four books—two with Sounds True Publishing and one with Hay House, which are major publishers in the self-help genre. Her fifth book will be published next month by yet another publisher, Modern Wisdom Press. Her books are therefore desirable among competitive publishers. Her book How to Read the Akashic Records is ranked #65 in the Parapsychology category on Amazon.com. Ms. Howe has sold thousands of books over the years. She therefore is a significant author.
Ms. Howe is the first person to make the Akashic Records (a subject long ago accepted for a listing on Wikipedia) accessible to the masses in several countries. She therefore is a significant pathbreaker. Since Wikipedia has that entry on the Akashic Records, if the Akashic Records are a significant enough subject for Wikipedia to allow an entry on it, it seems logical that a top author of books on the subject should be included on Wikipedia as well.
She also is one of the leading teachers of the Akashic Records in the world, having taught thousands of students in several countries. This makes her internationally significant.
Ms. Howe has won four awards from the Coalition of Visionary Resources, making her acknowledged as a significant figure from an important outside organization.
Let me give you some information about my own credentials. I’ve been successfully posting on Wikipedia for about 15 years. I am a career journalist and media expert. I’ve been published in over 65 venues, including the Chicago Sun-Times and university publications at Loyola University Chicago, DePaul University, the University of Chicago, the University of Illinois Chicago, the University of Illinois Springfield, and the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. I’ve been published in several peer-reviewed/refereed journals: the Delta Epsilon Sigma Journal, Nine: A Journal of Baseball History and Social Policy Perspectives, and the Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies. I have appeared on CNN, and been quoted in Forbes, USA Today, Epoch Times, and other major media. I am the author of four books. I’ve earned more than 60 journalism awards, including the Peter Lisagor Award—the top honor in Chicago journalism. As a career journalist, media commentator, and contributor to referred journals, I understand the importance of accurate and viable sourcing and information, and I believe sources and information about Ms. Howe are sound.
Wikipedia already has an entry on Linda Moulton Howe, a journalist and film maker who covers aliens, cow mutilation, and crop circle conspiricies. I believe differentiating two authors who happen to have similar names is important to both of them.
So I hope you will reconsider rejection of this article about Ms. Howe and allow it to be published. I would welcome any advice about suggested changes that will help the article be accepted for Wikipedia. Thank you for your attention to this matter, and I hope you have a great weekend! Billbike2 ( talk) 15:35, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
15:56, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Fake (and stalkers),
That's an impressive CV.
I'm a first-timer at submitting an article and was hoping you might be able to review and point out any issues or reasons it may not be published?
It's here: /info/en/?search=Draft:Raffaello_Degruttola
Really appreciate your time and help!
Rafffan
P.S. Hope this is my first article of many - let me know if I should quit while I'm ahead! :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rafffan ( talk • contribs) 15:30, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
On 31 May 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Angelo Sodano, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 11:26, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2022).
|
![]()
|
On 2 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Paul Gosar Twitter video incident, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Representative Paul Gosar once posted an anime video on Twitter depicting his killing Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and attacking President Joe Biden? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2021 Gosar-Cortez Twitter incident. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Paul Gosar Twitter video incident), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:02, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Hook update | |
Your hook reached 14,573 views (607.2 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of June 2022 – nice work! |
theleekycauldron ( talk • contribs) (she/ they) 03:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
I know what you're thinking with the RD, but there have been a tiny number of cases where a bio is fixed at the last minute. We've even posted a couple recently that have been archived, so RDs in a sense don't go stale. The monkeypox item is still under discussion, so unlikely but may still have some views to come. Thanks for your help though. Step hen 01:14, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi FakeScientist8000, I noticed that you have an interest in Massachusetts politics! I've been trying to get some edits made to the Stephanie Cutter article but so far have had no bites. She's a consultant from Massachusetts who worked in the Obama administration. Would you be interested in taking a look? I'd really appreciate it! I won't make any edits myself because I have a conflict of interest. Please let me know! PrecisionChristian ( talk) 13:27, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
On 7 June 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Barry Sussman, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 23:07, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Gosar Twitter video incident until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
TryKid dubious – discuss 09:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 11:32, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Fakescientist8000. Can you review Draft:Suki da again? I think it has been notable for now. PepeBonus ( talk) 11:13, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi FakeScientist8000, I made another request at the Stephanie Cutter Talk page and was wondering if you had seen it/would be willing to review? Please let me know! I really appreciate you reviewing my last request! Cheers, PrecisionChristian ( talk) 15:08, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Billy Kametz.png.webp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq ( talk) 00:27, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
On 16 June 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jim Ryan (politician), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 19:03, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:35, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi FakeScientist8000, I had responded to your note about the section headers on the Cutter article Talk page. Though I'd be inclined to agree with you that adding the headers should be noncontroversial, I don't want to risk any appearance of breaking the rules and would feel much more comfortable if you or another editor would consider adding them in. I also made another request at the Stephanie Cutter Talk page and was wondering if you would be willing to review it? I think it adds some good context about Cutter's work with Precision Strategies. I really appreciate all the time you've put into this! Cheers, PrecisionChristian ( talk) 15:09, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
On 27 June 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Tony Siragusa, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 21:08, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Welcome!
Hello, Fakescientist8000, and welcome to Wikipedia! I have noticed that you are fairly new! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I also see that some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Derek Chauvin, show an interest in the use of images and/or photos on Wikipedia.
Did you know that ...
If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
On 2 June 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Samuel E. Wright, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 23:28, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
I believe you made this edit to List of Japanese supercentenarians? Reference 40 has an error message: Cite error: The named reference nbc was invoked but never defined. Would you please take a look at it? Maybe copy the reference if it is from another Wikipedia article? If you do copy across articles, it is requested that one attribute the source. Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia See WP:PATT on how to attribute. Cheers Adakiko ( talk) 08:39, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Hm. Thanks for letting me know - I’ll get a hold on that. Fakescientist8000 ( talk) 16:41, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with
your edits to Lock-out device, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edits had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept
uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by
reliable,
verifiable (usually
secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an
inline citation, which you can learn to make
here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of
my talk page. Thanks.
Nightscream (
talk)
19:47, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Fakescientist8000! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of
Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the
edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at [[Talk:Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates]], please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 02:58, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Scott Seiss, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
scope_creep
Talk
23:06, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
With this coming from a sockpuppet, I take this with honor.
|
---|
Nikolay Zak has considered that a DNA or blood test must be made to comfirm when Jeanne Calment died. I think you shall stop claiming that Zak is a liar, he is not at all any liar, it is you who is
|
On 23 March 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Merri Dee, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 23:25, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
On 26 March 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Barrington Patterson, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – Muboshgu ( talk) 04:55, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
On 1 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ernie Carroll, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 02:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Katie talk 23:58, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
On 8 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Bruce Johnson (journalist), which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 10:45, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi, you couldn't see yourself just fixing my mistake instead of undoing it alltogether? How many ways are there to cite some article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yungkleina ( talk • contribs) 19:55, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
On 9 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article C. W. McCall, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 01:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Hey, I edited this because the title that was previously in its place has not been officially confirmed by the band or their record label. I think until this is the case, this information should be treat as false. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ernest Victory ( talk • contribs) 15:55, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
"I think until this is the case, this information should be treat as false", which would be a straight up violation of CRYSTAL. Cheers! Fake scientist 8000 16:57, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Why did you revert an edit (by me) on Sinn Féin? (Not trying to sound aggressive just curious) 78.17.143.44 ( talk) 00:29, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
For your contributions in counter-vandalism....Keep it going! Volten001 ☎ 00:04, 19 April 2022 (UTC) |
Don't do it. WP:IPSAREPEOPLETOO. 174.212.227.192 ( talk) 04:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
May I ask you that, instead of trying to ominously warn me with a red link to a supposed policy or guideline, we can have a civil discussion about it? Cheers! Fake scientist 8000 11:12, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Do not make any edit if you can’t provide reliable sources. Secondly Bawal do not come in Jaat Land. And lastly Jaats population in Bawal is almost negligible. If you want to make the changes you may provide appropriate resources or you will be reported for glorifying a particular community. Regards Ravibhooria ( talk) 11:24, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
You were in voilation of WP:NPOV, WP:UNDUE. And i had no intention to threaten you, i just wanted you to please stop the disruptive editing. Ravibhooria ( talk) 02:19, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
you will be reported for glorifying a particular community", and I also cannot see how I violated WP:NPOV and/or WP:UNDUE. Cheers! Fake scientist 8000 14:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
With this coming from a sockpuppet, I take this with honor.
|
---|
Material about living persons added to any Wikipedia page must be written with the greatest care and attention to verifiability, neutrality, and avoidance of original research. Editors must take particular care when adding information about living persons to any Wikipedia page. Such material requires a high degree of sensitivity, and must adhere strictly to all applicable laws in the United States, to this policy, and to Wikipedia's three core content policies: Neutral point of view (NPOV) Verifiability (V) No original research (NOR) We must get the article right. Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources. All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by an inline citation to a reliable, published source. Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion. The section on is poorly sourced if you actually read the article. Previous versions of the article do a better job explaining the sensitive nature but appear to be COI. the current post simply states false information after reviewing sources. GenZXY ( talk) 18:31, 22 April 2022 (UTC) |
On 23 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ali Hamsa, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 09:02, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
On 23 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Renate Holm, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Cheers. Wime Pocy 03:25, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi Fakescientist8000. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY 22:46, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 12:09, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
I noticed that you've put Better Call Saul down as one of your favorite shows and as such I saw it fit to tell you I have created these Userboxes to better display this fact
P.S. Thanks for the idea to make a Guestbook! FishandChipper ( talk) 20:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
On 29 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Salvatore Pica, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 03:28, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
On 29 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Alabo Graham-Douglas, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 20:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Please be careful with reverting edits made to someone's own user talk. Per WP:BLANKING, it's acceptable, although not great practice, to blank your own user talk. Definitely shouldn't be a rollback edit. — GFOLEY FOUR!— 23:46, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
On 4 May 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ricardo Alarcón, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 22:38, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
On 6 May 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Biancamaria Frabotta, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 09:01, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Online harassment indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 00:35, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
I'm very concerned that you chose to remove my comment with the claim (which surely isn't in good faith) that it is Grossly inappropriate; elsewhere you have claimed it violated NPOV. Not only do I not see how it's inappropriate (as it provides context to how it's different), I certainly don't see how it's grossly inappropriate. And what in that bit violates NPOV? I'm genuinely confused here - to provide context, I don't recall every touching an issue on Wikipedia relating to the Troubles ... there are surely nuances to it that I'm missing. Nfitz ( talk) 18:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
2021 Gosar-Cortez Twitter incident at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at
your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
PCN02WPS (
talk |
contribs)
04:33, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 11:27, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
On 15 May 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Randy Weaver, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 20:13, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
On 16 May 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Andrew Symonds, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – Muboshgu ( talk) 15:35, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
If you're so sure the nomination is going nowhere, what's the harm in letting it breathe for more than five minutes? What's the fear? — swpb T • go beyond • bad idea 15:36, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
"it's highly unlikely the consensus will change [from majority opposition]". Cheers! Fake scientist 8000 16:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Sorry did I make any mistakes making the page or why was the page deleted? Noogometni urejevalec ( talk) 16:22, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for the explanation Noogometni urejevalec ( talk) 16:31, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Re WP:GARAGE: Traditionally, based on etymology and underlying meaning, "neither", when distinguishing between items that are themselves singular, always takes the singular. "Neither of the bands is ..." is the same thing as "Neither band is ...", which clarifies the matter because you wouldn't write "Neither band are ...".
On the other hand, with "neither" is well as with "none", I realize actual usage gives support to the plural verb. (By its original, it has historically been "None of the bands is", because "none" = "not one": "Not one of the bands is".) And, in addition, now that I see you also restored those links that I'd removed, I realize the point is to mimic a badly written article, which might indeed have such bogus links in it. I'm surprised I didn't notice that in the first place.
So all is well, though I did want to bring the point to your attention about the traditional prescribed usage of "neither". Regards, Largoplazo ( talk) 16:11, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Fakescientist8000!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cheers!
Fake
scientist
8000
13:43, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
|
I have restored my changes to the page on Mr Turner. The article now reflects the current situation ie that all allegations against him have been dismissed. It is highly likely that the allegations were malicious and made by Labour Party politicians for their own reasons.
You may have felt that my summary was tendentious and I have altered this.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.57.253.190 ( talk) 17:08, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Please read the process for reviewing and stop outright rejecting articles that have only been submitted once unless they are obviously vandalism or otherwise qualify for speedy deletion (in which case, just tag them.) PRAXIDICAE💕 17:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Please don't unilaterally move long-standing articles out of mainspace like you did here [1]. This is disruptive and equivalent to stealth deletion. Spicy ( talk) 14:00, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 11:36, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Dear Fakescientist8000: Greetings! I am William S. Bike, and I am asking you to reconsider your rejection of my draft of a Linda Howe page for Wikipedia, and that you will allow it to be posted.
You called Ms. Howe not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. I would like to respectfully disagree with this point. Ms. Howe is the author of four books—two with Sounds True Publishing and one with Hay House, which are major publishers in the self-help genre. Her fifth book will be published next month by yet another publisher, Modern Wisdom Press. Her books are therefore desirable among competitive publishers. Her book How to Read the Akashic Records is ranked #65 in the Parapsychology category on Amazon.com. Ms. Howe has sold thousands of books over the years. She therefore is a significant author.
Ms. Howe is the first person to make the Akashic Records (a subject long ago accepted for a listing on Wikipedia) accessible to the masses in several countries. She therefore is a significant pathbreaker. Since Wikipedia has that entry on the Akashic Records, if the Akashic Records are a significant enough subject for Wikipedia to allow an entry on it, it seems logical that a top author of books on the subject should be included on Wikipedia as well.
She also is one of the leading teachers of the Akashic Records in the world, having taught thousands of students in several countries. This makes her internationally significant.
Ms. Howe has won four awards from the Coalition of Visionary Resources, making her acknowledged as a significant figure from an important outside organization.
Let me give you some information about my own credentials. I’ve been successfully posting on Wikipedia for about 15 years. I am a career journalist and media expert. I’ve been published in over 65 venues, including the Chicago Sun-Times and university publications at Loyola University Chicago, DePaul University, the University of Chicago, the University of Illinois Chicago, the University of Illinois Springfield, and the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. I’ve been published in several peer-reviewed/refereed journals: the Delta Epsilon Sigma Journal, Nine: A Journal of Baseball History and Social Policy Perspectives, and the Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies. I have appeared on CNN, and been quoted in Forbes, USA Today, Epoch Times, and other major media. I am the author of four books. I’ve earned more than 60 journalism awards, including the Peter Lisagor Award—the top honor in Chicago journalism. As a career journalist, media commentator, and contributor to referred journals, I understand the importance of accurate and viable sourcing and information, and I believe sources and information about Ms. Howe are sound.
Wikipedia already has an entry on Linda Moulton Howe, a journalist and film maker who covers aliens, cow mutilation, and crop circle conspiricies. I believe differentiating two authors who happen to have similar names is important to both of them.
So I hope you will reconsider rejection of this article about Ms. Howe and allow it to be published. I would welcome any advice about suggested changes that will help the article be accepted for Wikipedia. Thank you for your attention to this matter, and I hope you have a great weekend! Billbike2 ( talk) 15:35, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
15:56, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Fake (and stalkers),
That's an impressive CV.
I'm a first-timer at submitting an article and was hoping you might be able to review and point out any issues or reasons it may not be published?
It's here: /info/en/?search=Draft:Raffaello_Degruttola
Really appreciate your time and help!
Rafffan
P.S. Hope this is my first article of many - let me know if I should quit while I'm ahead! :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rafffan ( talk • contribs) 15:30, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
On 31 May 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Angelo Sodano, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 11:26, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2022).
|
![]()
|
On 2 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Paul Gosar Twitter video incident, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Representative Paul Gosar once posted an anime video on Twitter depicting his killing Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and attacking President Joe Biden? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2021 Gosar-Cortez Twitter incident. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Paul Gosar Twitter video incident), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:02, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Hook update | |
Your hook reached 14,573 views (607.2 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of June 2022 – nice work! |
theleekycauldron ( talk • contribs) (she/ they) 03:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
I know what you're thinking with the RD, but there have been a tiny number of cases where a bio is fixed at the last minute. We've even posted a couple recently that have been archived, so RDs in a sense don't go stale. The monkeypox item is still under discussion, so unlikely but may still have some views to come. Thanks for your help though. Step hen 01:14, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi FakeScientist8000, I noticed that you have an interest in Massachusetts politics! I've been trying to get some edits made to the Stephanie Cutter article but so far have had no bites. She's a consultant from Massachusetts who worked in the Obama administration. Would you be interested in taking a look? I'd really appreciate it! I won't make any edits myself because I have a conflict of interest. Please let me know! PrecisionChristian ( talk) 13:27, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
On 7 June 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Barry Sussman, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 23:07, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Gosar Twitter video incident until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
TryKid dubious – discuss 09:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 11:32, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Fakescientist8000. Can you review Draft:Suki da again? I think it has been notable for now. PepeBonus ( talk) 11:13, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi FakeScientist8000, I made another request at the Stephanie Cutter Talk page and was wondering if you had seen it/would be willing to review? Please let me know! I really appreciate you reviewing my last request! Cheers, PrecisionChristian ( talk) 15:08, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Billy Kametz.png.webp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq ( talk) 00:27, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
On 16 June 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jim Ryan (politician), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 19:03, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:35, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi FakeScientist8000, I had responded to your note about the section headers on the Cutter article Talk page. Though I'd be inclined to agree with you that adding the headers should be noncontroversial, I don't want to risk any appearance of breaking the rules and would feel much more comfortable if you or another editor would consider adding them in. I also made another request at the Stephanie Cutter Talk page and was wondering if you would be willing to review it? I think it adds some good context about Cutter's work with Precision Strategies. I really appreciate all the time you've put into this! Cheers, PrecisionChristian ( talk) 15:09, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
On 27 June 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Tony Siragusa, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 21:08, 27 June 2022 (UTC)