![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
LinkNYC you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Esquivalience --
Esquivalience (
talk)
23:01, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
This is why I was extremely wary of your removal of all of the citations from the introduction at Fake news website at [1].
Please see discussion page at [2].
And please see the recent edits by Crossswords where he's tagging literally everything now in the introduction section with "citation needed" tags, directly against WP:CITELEAD.
Maybe it is better to avoid conflict and just add all those citations back into the introduction section again ?
Sagecandor ( talk) 05:02, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
"The necessity for citations in a lead should be determined on a case-by-case basis by editorial consensus. Complex, current, or controversial subjects may require many citations; others, few or none. The presence of citations in the introduction is neither required in every article nor prohibited in any article."
Your unilateral decision to remove all citations from the lead of Dakota Access Pipeline protests without seeking consensus has been noted. Some, myself included, might reasonably consider your behavior aggressive. SashiRolls ( talk) 21:28, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Since I see that you are also involved on the "Fake news website" page (which is quite rightly considered biased by most of those commenting), you might consider doing your work there, where it would be more useful. Incidentally, I'm not really cross with you, you did not delete references on DAPL protest, which is what I thought you had done when I first looked at it. I corrected the minor mistakes you introduced and note that you corrected one mistake I'd made (forgot a hyphen in high-profile). Thanks for that. Now, why don't you bring your LEADCITE zeal over to Fake news website, which is an article that really needs balancing attention (as the talk page attests).
Thanks! SashiRolls ( talk) 21:52, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Epicgenius, I've got concerns with a couple (hopefully good natured) copy editors.
At first, the first user came by and instead of copy editing, simply reverted to an older version of the article claiming all my copy edits were bad.
I happen to be a native English speaker with many years of school and much coursework over the years in writing, composition, copy editing, etc.
But that's neither here nor there, the main crux of the problem is: (1) wholesale reverting instead of discussing, (2) refusal to use the article talk page and ignoring my requests to do so, (3) enlisting friends to perform same reverts and same behavior of ignoring requests to use the talk page.
Asks friend to make same revert [6].
Friend shows up and makes same revert -- this time wholesale revert including reverting not just my copy editing but all of my additions of new content as well [7].
I've asked both the first user and the enlisted new friend 2nd user to come to the article talk page to discuss.
Both have either ignored me or refused to do so.
Not sure how to go from here? Sagecandor ( talk) 02:29, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Fake news websites are websites...is technically correct. Though it may seem redundant, we are confirming that fake news websites aren't something else. We may have to reword that, though. How about
Fake news websites are sites...? epicgenius ( talk) 05:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Significant concerns with [8] as related to [9]. Attention would be appreciated. Sagecandor ( talk) 16:04, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your work on the Aqueduct Racetrack article. Is there anything else I can help with on the article? Thanks-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 01:59, 30 November 2016 (UTC).
The article
Aqueduct Racetrack (IND Rockaway Line) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Aqueduct Racetrack (IND Rockaway Line) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Mackensen --
Mackensen (
talk)
03:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
75th Avenue (IND Queens Boulevard Line) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Mackensen --
Mackensen (
talk)
13:40, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
The article
75th Avenue (IND Queens Boulevard Line) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:75th Avenue (IND Queens Boulevard Line) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Mackensen --
Mackensen (
talk)
14:01, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
On 10 December 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 72nd Street (Second Avenue Subway), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 72nd, 86th, and 96th Street stations along the Second Avenue Subway are part of the New York City Subway's first major expansion in over half a century? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/72nd Street (Second Avenue Subway). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, 72nd Street (Second Avenue Subway)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
On 10 December 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 86th Street (Second Avenue Subway), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 72nd, 86th, and 96th Street stations along the Second Avenue Subway are part of the New York City Subway's first major expansion in over half a century? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/86th Street (Second Avenue Subway). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, 86th Street (Second Avenue Subway)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
On 10 December 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 96th Street (Second Avenue Subway), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 72nd, 86th, and 96th Street stations along the Second Avenue Subway are part of the New York City Subway's first major expansion in over half a century? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/96th Street (Second Avenue Subway). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, 96th Street (Second Avenue Subway)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi Epicgenius, hope you're doing well. How's this banner coming along? Best, Castncoot ( talk) 12:40, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Royal free city. Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
The article
75th Avenue (IND Queens Boulevard Line) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:75th Avenue (IND Queens Boulevard Line) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Mackensen --
Mackensen (
talk)
13:41, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi there Epicgenius. I was hanging out at WDW today, trying to see if I could capture a picture of the elusive 7 buses that we don't have a picture of (spoiler alert, I haven't found them). In my quest, I found 3 buses that, according to the table you so kindly created, do not exist (such as bus number 5199). I was wondering if you wouldn't mind adding them to the table, because I do not know the specs on them. I took pictures of their barcodes, which I posted to Flickr and not Commons to try to help you. Thanks, Elisfkc ( talk) 23:11, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Wednesday December 21, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC | |
---|---|
![]() ![]() You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop at Babycastles gallery by 14th Street / Union Square in Manhattan. This will be the holiday party! Celebrate a December holiday with us, or in wiki-fashion, edit the calendar itself and join us to celebrate any holiday of your choice regardless of when it usually happens. Featuring special guest presentations on structure data, university library meetups, metrics and reporting, and other topics. We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming edit-a-thons, and other outreach activities. We welcome the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from all educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects. After the main meeting, savory and sweet pies and refreshments and video games in the gallery!
We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! -- Pharos ( talk) 21:43, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
|
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
Hello Epicgenius: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, North America 1000 15:30, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Latest news from the Wikimedia Collaboration team, about Notifications, Flow and Edit Review Improvements. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you.
What's new?
A decision has been made about how the Recent Changes filtering scheme will affect current ORES beta feature users. When this new filtering system rolls out as part of the beta, it will replace the current ORES display on the Recent Changes page. That means the automatic color coding, the red “r” symbol and the “hide probably good edits” filter will go away, to be replaced by the new, more nuanced set of filters and user-defined color coding. All other pages that have ORES features, like Watchlist and Related Changes, will remain as they are now for ORES beta users. We think those pages could also benefit from the new filtering system. But we'll wait to see how users react to the beta test—and make any necessary changes—before we start spreading the new UI around. That's the plan as it currently stands. As always, please let us know if you have any thoughts, in any language.
Edit Review Improvements [ More information • Help pages]
Recent changes
Notifications [ More information • Help pages]
Problems
Flow [ More information • Help pages]
Recent changes
Miscellaneous
Collaboration team's newsletter prepared by the Collaboration team and posted by bot • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
10:09, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Aqueduct Racetrack (IND Rockaway Line) at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
North America
1000
19:57, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello Epicgenius/Archive/2016: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Tenebrae ( talk) 09:52, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for converting the bulleted list into prose. I had been intending to do that, but I have had school work to do. Also, thank you once again for your work on articles related to SAS, as well as the South Ferry article. We should nominated to be a GA. It is great working with you. Will you go to SAS on opening day? I am.-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 20:37, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Epicgenius. I am trying to split off some of the content from the History of the New York City Subway article. This, I thought, would be a good start. I have added some information. If possible, could you help by adding references, and improving the content to make it its own article. Once it is completed, the content should be summarized in the history article. Hopefully, then, we will able to do this for other timeframes. Then we could have an article on the more recent history of the subway system, and then we can split off some information from the New York City Subway article. Please tell me what you think. Thank you again.-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 03:22, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
I have also tried to revert the edits. On the 59th Street (BMT Fourth Avenue Line) infobox the W bullet shows up and I don't know how to remove it. Could you help with that? Thanks.-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 16:55, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
I have added a lot more information about the 1970s plans and construction to that article. I think that the content should be arranged differently. Could you possible help with this? Thanks. After Phase 1 opens, we should try to get this to become a featured article.-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 17:33, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
See recent edits by Special:Contributions/170.28.136.41, which I've reverted. I left notes on the talk page about the absence of towns in New York City, but I'm not sure that they're being read. Alansohn ( talk) 18:48, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
I don't know how to update NYCS const to update the date for the Q timetable. [16] By the way, they made a stupid mistake. The SAS stations are not listed as accessible.-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 02:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
I can't figure out how to add the (W) to the Fourth Avenue and Sea Beach template on here. DO you know hoe to do it? AahdTahar ( talk) 00:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi, epicgenius. The map for the Q train File:NYCS_map_Q.svg needs to be updated. When you have a chance, could you do this? Also, could you update the N train one. Thanks and some more stuff about SAS is available on the MTA website.-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 19:22, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
The article
LinkNYC you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:LinkNYC for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Esquivalience --
Esquivalience (
talk)
22:21, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
LinkNYC you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Esquivalience --
Esquivalience (
talk)
23:01, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
This is why I was extremely wary of your removal of all of the citations from the introduction at Fake news website at [1].
Please see discussion page at [2].
And please see the recent edits by Crossswords where he's tagging literally everything now in the introduction section with "citation needed" tags, directly against WP:CITELEAD.
Maybe it is better to avoid conflict and just add all those citations back into the introduction section again ?
Sagecandor ( talk) 05:02, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
"The necessity for citations in a lead should be determined on a case-by-case basis by editorial consensus. Complex, current, or controversial subjects may require many citations; others, few or none. The presence of citations in the introduction is neither required in every article nor prohibited in any article."
Your unilateral decision to remove all citations from the lead of Dakota Access Pipeline protests without seeking consensus has been noted. Some, myself included, might reasonably consider your behavior aggressive. SashiRolls ( talk) 21:28, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Since I see that you are also involved on the "Fake news website" page (which is quite rightly considered biased by most of those commenting), you might consider doing your work there, where it would be more useful. Incidentally, I'm not really cross with you, you did not delete references on DAPL protest, which is what I thought you had done when I first looked at it. I corrected the minor mistakes you introduced and note that you corrected one mistake I'd made (forgot a hyphen in high-profile). Thanks for that. Now, why don't you bring your LEADCITE zeal over to Fake news website, which is an article that really needs balancing attention (as the talk page attests).
Thanks! SashiRolls ( talk) 21:52, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Epicgenius, I've got concerns with a couple (hopefully good natured) copy editors.
At first, the first user came by and instead of copy editing, simply reverted to an older version of the article claiming all my copy edits were bad.
I happen to be a native English speaker with many years of school and much coursework over the years in writing, composition, copy editing, etc.
But that's neither here nor there, the main crux of the problem is: (1) wholesale reverting instead of discussing, (2) refusal to use the article talk page and ignoring my requests to do so, (3) enlisting friends to perform same reverts and same behavior of ignoring requests to use the talk page.
Asks friend to make same revert [6].
Friend shows up and makes same revert -- this time wholesale revert including reverting not just my copy editing but all of my additions of new content as well [7].
I've asked both the first user and the enlisted new friend 2nd user to come to the article talk page to discuss.
Both have either ignored me or refused to do so.
Not sure how to go from here? Sagecandor ( talk) 02:29, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Fake news websites are websites...is technically correct. Though it may seem redundant, we are confirming that fake news websites aren't something else. We may have to reword that, though. How about
Fake news websites are sites...? epicgenius ( talk) 05:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Significant concerns with [8] as related to [9]. Attention would be appreciated. Sagecandor ( talk) 16:04, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your work on the Aqueduct Racetrack article. Is there anything else I can help with on the article? Thanks-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 01:59, 30 November 2016 (UTC).
The article
Aqueduct Racetrack (IND Rockaway Line) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Aqueduct Racetrack (IND Rockaway Line) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Mackensen --
Mackensen (
talk)
03:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
75th Avenue (IND Queens Boulevard Line) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Mackensen --
Mackensen (
talk)
13:40, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
The article
75th Avenue (IND Queens Boulevard Line) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:75th Avenue (IND Queens Boulevard Line) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Mackensen --
Mackensen (
talk)
14:01, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
On 10 December 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 72nd Street (Second Avenue Subway), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 72nd, 86th, and 96th Street stations along the Second Avenue Subway are part of the New York City Subway's first major expansion in over half a century? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/72nd Street (Second Avenue Subway). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, 72nd Street (Second Avenue Subway)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
On 10 December 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 86th Street (Second Avenue Subway), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 72nd, 86th, and 96th Street stations along the Second Avenue Subway are part of the New York City Subway's first major expansion in over half a century? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/86th Street (Second Avenue Subway). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, 86th Street (Second Avenue Subway)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
On 10 December 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 96th Street (Second Avenue Subway), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 72nd, 86th, and 96th Street stations along the Second Avenue Subway are part of the New York City Subway's first major expansion in over half a century? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/96th Street (Second Avenue Subway). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, 96th Street (Second Avenue Subway)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi Epicgenius, hope you're doing well. How's this banner coming along? Best, Castncoot ( talk) 12:40, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Royal free city. Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
The article
75th Avenue (IND Queens Boulevard Line) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:75th Avenue (IND Queens Boulevard Line) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Mackensen --
Mackensen (
talk)
13:41, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi there Epicgenius. I was hanging out at WDW today, trying to see if I could capture a picture of the elusive 7 buses that we don't have a picture of (spoiler alert, I haven't found them). In my quest, I found 3 buses that, according to the table you so kindly created, do not exist (such as bus number 5199). I was wondering if you wouldn't mind adding them to the table, because I do not know the specs on them. I took pictures of their barcodes, which I posted to Flickr and not Commons to try to help you. Thanks, Elisfkc ( talk) 23:11, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Wednesday December 21, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC | |
---|---|
![]() ![]() You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop at Babycastles gallery by 14th Street / Union Square in Manhattan. This will be the holiday party! Celebrate a December holiday with us, or in wiki-fashion, edit the calendar itself and join us to celebrate any holiday of your choice regardless of when it usually happens. Featuring special guest presentations on structure data, university library meetups, metrics and reporting, and other topics. We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming edit-a-thons, and other outreach activities. We welcome the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from all educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects. After the main meeting, savory and sweet pies and refreshments and video games in the gallery!
We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! -- Pharos ( talk) 21:43, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
|
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
Hello Epicgenius: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, North America 1000 15:30, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Latest news from the Wikimedia Collaboration team, about Notifications, Flow and Edit Review Improvements. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you.
What's new?
A decision has been made about how the Recent Changes filtering scheme will affect current ORES beta feature users. When this new filtering system rolls out as part of the beta, it will replace the current ORES display on the Recent Changes page. That means the automatic color coding, the red “r” symbol and the “hide probably good edits” filter will go away, to be replaced by the new, more nuanced set of filters and user-defined color coding. All other pages that have ORES features, like Watchlist and Related Changes, will remain as they are now for ORES beta users. We think those pages could also benefit from the new filtering system. But we'll wait to see how users react to the beta test—and make any necessary changes—before we start spreading the new UI around. That's the plan as it currently stands. As always, please let us know if you have any thoughts, in any language.
Edit Review Improvements [ More information • Help pages]
Recent changes
Notifications [ More information • Help pages]
Problems
Flow [ More information • Help pages]
Recent changes
Miscellaneous
Collaboration team's newsletter prepared by the Collaboration team and posted by bot • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
10:09, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Aqueduct Racetrack (IND Rockaway Line) at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
North America
1000
19:57, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello Epicgenius/Archive/2016: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Tenebrae ( talk) 09:52, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for converting the bulleted list into prose. I had been intending to do that, but I have had school work to do. Also, thank you once again for your work on articles related to SAS, as well as the South Ferry article. We should nominated to be a GA. It is great working with you. Will you go to SAS on opening day? I am.-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 20:37, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Epicgenius. I am trying to split off some of the content from the History of the New York City Subway article. This, I thought, would be a good start. I have added some information. If possible, could you help by adding references, and improving the content to make it its own article. Once it is completed, the content should be summarized in the history article. Hopefully, then, we will able to do this for other timeframes. Then we could have an article on the more recent history of the subway system, and then we can split off some information from the New York City Subway article. Please tell me what you think. Thank you again.-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 03:22, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
I have also tried to revert the edits. On the 59th Street (BMT Fourth Avenue Line) infobox the W bullet shows up and I don't know how to remove it. Could you help with that? Thanks.-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 16:55, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
I have added a lot more information about the 1970s plans and construction to that article. I think that the content should be arranged differently. Could you possible help with this? Thanks. After Phase 1 opens, we should try to get this to become a featured article.-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 17:33, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
See recent edits by Special:Contributions/170.28.136.41, which I've reverted. I left notes on the talk page about the absence of towns in New York City, but I'm not sure that they're being read. Alansohn ( talk) 18:48, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
I don't know how to update NYCS const to update the date for the Q timetable. [16] By the way, they made a stupid mistake. The SAS stations are not listed as accessible.-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 02:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
I can't figure out how to add the (W) to the Fourth Avenue and Sea Beach template on here. DO you know hoe to do it? AahdTahar ( talk) 00:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi, epicgenius. The map for the Q train File:NYCS_map_Q.svg needs to be updated. When you have a chance, could you do this? Also, could you update the N train one. Thanks and some more stuff about SAS is available on the MTA website.-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 19:22, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
The article
LinkNYC you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:LinkNYC for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Esquivalience --
Esquivalience (
talk)
22:21, 30 December 2016 (UTC)