Hey there! What do you think about this article about Dom? It's being nominated for deletion. The Optimistic One ( talk) 18:57, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Is this an edit war over Söldner: Secret Wars? You have the cite for the official website of the game and you will not recognize that as sufficient proof the site is down? You have exceeded the maximum reverts and now need to seek some consensus and get some others with you before you continue. You can read these to learn more about this topic. Wikipedia:Edit_warring Wikipedia:Reverting — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.182.1.239 ( talk) 17:19, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
As an editor who commented at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film between Jan. 1, 2019, and today, you may wish to join a discussion at that page, here.-- Tenebrae ( talk) 00:00, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi, you recently reverted a change that I made, stating as a reason "Not notable unless covered by a reliable third-party source". I started a discussion whether the section I added should be part of the page. You may want to participate. If there is no opposition to my suggestion there, I'm planning to make the changes. -- Martinkunev ( talk) 18:50, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Please explain which guidelines you feel were violated to cause your reversion 02:40, 28 February 2020 ("Reducing gameplay section to essentials, avoiding WP:GAMECRUFT") of Grand Prix Legends. BMJ-pdx ( talk) 12:52, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Are you a DCS player? The modules table is insanely useful for considering whether one of my favorite aircraft is available to purchase. I can't believe you deleted it. Nelsonblaha ( talk) 01:02, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
you tell me to search for a source, but i cannot pinpoint a single link. if you look at comments of multiple videos, websites, etc. you will see most people praise it's soundtrack, so maybe can you just add as a source to "Search in google" or that many people say on the internet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by HenriDeadMort ( talk • contribs) 23:43, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Could we please discuss the merits of the "reliability" of the provided sources? Yes, they aren't third-party, but it's a big game company and such announcements as the release dates, gameplay detail and naming could be trusted IMO. Zxmerlin ( talk) 10:59, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
why would you revert my edit in the mu online page! global mu left his server there and you deleted mine! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:8E03:3D00:90D4:5E60:EA1B:424 ( talk) 02:01, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Eik, in this edit, you stripped out the emojis in several editors' signatures. Do you have something installed in your browser that does that? I've fixed this instance, but it bears looking into. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 20:38, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
This user removed interesting and informative and helpful information from pages that I love Sport.07GamerDet ( talk) 18:33, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Please revert these edits😑😤 Sport.07GamerDet ( talk) 18:35, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Still some things might need to be added because they have a lot of gaps in some places. And some of that stuff was okay for that page. Sport.07GamerDet ( talk) 18:40, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Hey, what's the problem with what I've written? I understand if it isn't useful. Thanks :) Andrew012p ( talk) 18:42, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for helping clean up the Bob the builder character page. There are a few things I wanted to bring to your attention. First the characters from the 2015 series should be in its own page and not on the list about the Bob The Builder characters as those characters are part of a reboot and are totally different than the original series. Another thing is some of the characters like Mr. Bentley, bird, pilchard and the other minor characters played an important role in the show, so therefore should not be deleted. Most of the Human characters playing important role in the show. The voice actors I can see being deleted however you’re only deleting half sentences and not the whole thing. The final factor is that some of the machines only appear every so often and you’re labeling them incorrectly. Mr. Smilie ( talk) 22:53, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Can you support this Danish page, because after some time it will be deleted "Maskinoversættelse og/eller tvivlsomt indhold" and "Denne side virker ikke som en encyklopædisk artikel" on this page https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dansk_tilbagetr%C3%A6kning_fra_EU ? Wname1 ( talk) 20:59, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, thanks for notifying me about GAMECRUFT #7 on the MFS2020 article. I feel like there could be an importance to add info about the exclusive planes and airports included though. I am thinking on giving the list of exclusive planes and airports in prose as I view it as concise. What do you think? Gerald WL ✉ 12:45, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
FlyingsCool ( talk) 01:25, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
I can't say I like the idea of removing the lists of aircraft and airports. The chart that was in the Wiki was the most concise I could find anywhere, and it is very important to users who are considering purchasing the game and want to understand which version to buy. Not to mention the links to pictures of the planes were also very helpful in understanding what's in the game. I also disagree with "sort of" listing the planes in text. I find that very confusing, and for someone who doesn't know the planes, useless. That, too me, falls under the first section of #7
I have not found any other sources that listed this very important information as concisely as had been done here. All the ones I've found are too long winded and unreadable.
I think providing a link to a sub-wiki that lists the planes and airports as they were would be helpful if they can't be put back in. But, overall, these two charts were very important to me and I think critical in understanding what you're purchasing and what's there. To me, this falls directly under "Sometimes a concise summary is appropriate if it is essential to understanding the game or its significance in the industry. " - FlyingsCool ( talk) 01:24, 24 August 2020 (UTC)FlyingsCool - Tom Perry
Hi Eik Corell. The main references you wanted are the following:
In any case, after you intervened in the article, my understanding is that no lists of aircraft should be visible on the article dealing with the video game. BUT... I could create, and I think this should be fine, I could create a list article especially intended to show those lists (the following is an example of such kind of list: List of Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic characters). Just tell me what you think about the above. Kind regards. Kintaro ( talk) 23:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello, you made a few pretty major changes in the article a while back, removing the list of modules citing WP:GAMECRUFT, but since then an IP user has added a pretty lame version back. Would it be appropriate to remove it again? It is quite cluttered and really I doubt anyone cares. HarryKernow (talk) 02:31, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Sometimes I take a look at what other editors in the same IP range as me have been doing and I noticed that Avatar: The Last Airbender – Into the Inferno was in need of some improvement. Please note that I am a different editor from the person you recently reverted. I invite you to review my edits. Also I'm wondering where that Metacritic PlayStation 2 score could possibly have come from. -- 109.76.198.1 ( talk) 08:58, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for helping me roll back the vandal's edits! Tommy has a great username ( talk) 00:15, 4 November 2020 (UTC) |
Hi Eik. I just want to let you know that you should be OK to report the Cancelled Platforms to AIV user whenever they pop up with a new IP. I've seen you typically are very quick at reverting them as well, so thank you for that; it's much appreciated! If you're ever unsure on reporting them, just check their IP geolocation to see if it's in Ireland and that should be enough considering how blatant their edits usually are. (Apologizes if this is patronizing—I'm not sure how familiar you are with AIV, despite you being a much more experienced editor than I am.) Perryprog ( talk) 17:19, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Anyway—your point still stands, and you absolutely have more experience and expertise in this area than I do, although I personally think if an IP is being particularly persistent, it's worth reporting to AIV (as long as it's a documented LTA of course—otherwise they need to be warned). Perryprog ( talk) 01:03, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
I spent a lot of time adding the cast section to the article. I thing that information is extremely important. I think you should undo your edit that removes it. Nosecone33 ( talk) 00:40, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
You're right about the lack of sources, however this is common in articles translated from French and basically all articles on pre-modern history. I moved this text here from the article about the rebellion, where it was definitely WP:UNDUE.
I plan, unless you strenously object, to put this on the talk page as requiring work. There actually are people starting to work on Algerian history now and one of them will possibly know the ancient saga this story is probably from. At that point someone can improve the reference format and take a stand at improving the tone. But it does provide information that likely *can* be sourced. There's plenty more of this in French medieval history if you are looking for work, but it's a bit arbitrary to just delete actual information in just one article IMHO, and I'm requesting that in future you take reference issues you may have about any given articles to the talk page in future; constructive criticism is great. Elinruby ( talk) 01:24, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Eik Corell,
Just a reminder that any time you tag a page for deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/TFD/CFD/etc.), you should post a notice on the talk page of the page creator to inform them. Sometimes, there are steps they can take to eliminate the problem with the page. I recommend using Twinkle because, once you set up your Preferences, the program will automatically post this notification for you, whenever you tag a page. This really speeds things up and makes things easy. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 00:04, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaush until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
I understand you are just trying to remove vandalism but nobody will help improve this page, its disgusting and finding non-wiki sources for this game is impossible while still having a nice page, so please.. help me, T4C deserves better than this crap, I have personally talked to Erik Ashley and Francis Lahaie and you dont have to tell me that; that isn't a source and not reliable.. i already know. you will not find anything great about this game to write home about and yet the fans of this game have to see a dead article. How can we show good information on a games history if all the good history is from old BBS forums that dont exist anymore and are not on wayback machine. so i ask again, instead of deleting please help find a solution. Matthew Smith ( talk)
I was trying to make the List of Samurai Jack Episodes summaries more consistent in length with those of Season 5. Other TV series episodes list in this encyclopedia get more than one or two sentences per episode. Why should this be the exception? 67.169.3.238 ( talk) 08:21, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
For the mostly thankless, and even sometimes criticised, task of dealing with a seemingly innocuous but prolific vandalism farm. CMD ( talk) 04:20, 5 October 2021 (UTC) |
Please, remane page Albatross cx to Korolupy who was the origin name. See the history of the page. See also cs:Korolupy and other languages. Thanks. Petr Tomasovsky ( talk) 15:01, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
For trying. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 18:42, 23 November 2021 (UTC) |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Command: Modern Air Naval Operations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DLC.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:56, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
I see that you spend a lot of time reverting and so destroying additions which are respectful and useful... what is your aim, to discourage valid contributions from other users? I thought Wikipedia was intended as open to voluntary contributions and that no one should be allowed to vandalize proper work made by others. Corrado72 ( talk) 15:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hey there! What do you think about this article about Dom? It's being nominated for deletion. The Optimistic One ( talk) 18:57, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Is this an edit war over Söldner: Secret Wars? You have the cite for the official website of the game and you will not recognize that as sufficient proof the site is down? You have exceeded the maximum reverts and now need to seek some consensus and get some others with you before you continue. You can read these to learn more about this topic. Wikipedia:Edit_warring Wikipedia:Reverting — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.182.1.239 ( talk) 17:19, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
As an editor who commented at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film between Jan. 1, 2019, and today, you may wish to join a discussion at that page, here.-- Tenebrae ( talk) 00:00, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi, you recently reverted a change that I made, stating as a reason "Not notable unless covered by a reliable third-party source". I started a discussion whether the section I added should be part of the page. You may want to participate. If there is no opposition to my suggestion there, I'm planning to make the changes. -- Martinkunev ( talk) 18:50, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Please explain which guidelines you feel were violated to cause your reversion 02:40, 28 February 2020 ("Reducing gameplay section to essentials, avoiding WP:GAMECRUFT") of Grand Prix Legends. BMJ-pdx ( talk) 12:52, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Are you a DCS player? The modules table is insanely useful for considering whether one of my favorite aircraft is available to purchase. I can't believe you deleted it. Nelsonblaha ( talk) 01:02, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
you tell me to search for a source, but i cannot pinpoint a single link. if you look at comments of multiple videos, websites, etc. you will see most people praise it's soundtrack, so maybe can you just add as a source to "Search in google" or that many people say on the internet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by HenriDeadMort ( talk • contribs) 23:43, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Could we please discuss the merits of the "reliability" of the provided sources? Yes, they aren't third-party, but it's a big game company and such announcements as the release dates, gameplay detail and naming could be trusted IMO. Zxmerlin ( talk) 10:59, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
why would you revert my edit in the mu online page! global mu left his server there and you deleted mine! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:8E03:3D00:90D4:5E60:EA1B:424 ( talk) 02:01, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Eik, in this edit, you stripped out the emojis in several editors' signatures. Do you have something installed in your browser that does that? I've fixed this instance, but it bears looking into. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 20:38, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
This user removed interesting and informative and helpful information from pages that I love Sport.07GamerDet ( talk) 18:33, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Please revert these edits😑😤 Sport.07GamerDet ( talk) 18:35, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Still some things might need to be added because they have a lot of gaps in some places. And some of that stuff was okay for that page. Sport.07GamerDet ( talk) 18:40, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Hey, what's the problem with what I've written? I understand if it isn't useful. Thanks :) Andrew012p ( talk) 18:42, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for helping clean up the Bob the builder character page. There are a few things I wanted to bring to your attention. First the characters from the 2015 series should be in its own page and not on the list about the Bob The Builder characters as those characters are part of a reboot and are totally different than the original series. Another thing is some of the characters like Mr. Bentley, bird, pilchard and the other minor characters played an important role in the show, so therefore should not be deleted. Most of the Human characters playing important role in the show. The voice actors I can see being deleted however you’re only deleting half sentences and not the whole thing. The final factor is that some of the machines only appear every so often and you’re labeling them incorrectly. Mr. Smilie ( talk) 22:53, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Can you support this Danish page, because after some time it will be deleted "Maskinoversættelse og/eller tvivlsomt indhold" and "Denne side virker ikke som en encyklopædisk artikel" on this page https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dansk_tilbagetr%C3%A6kning_fra_EU ? Wname1 ( talk) 20:59, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, thanks for notifying me about GAMECRUFT #7 on the MFS2020 article. I feel like there could be an importance to add info about the exclusive planes and airports included though. I am thinking on giving the list of exclusive planes and airports in prose as I view it as concise. What do you think? Gerald WL ✉ 12:45, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
FlyingsCool ( talk) 01:25, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
I can't say I like the idea of removing the lists of aircraft and airports. The chart that was in the Wiki was the most concise I could find anywhere, and it is very important to users who are considering purchasing the game and want to understand which version to buy. Not to mention the links to pictures of the planes were also very helpful in understanding what's in the game. I also disagree with "sort of" listing the planes in text. I find that very confusing, and for someone who doesn't know the planes, useless. That, too me, falls under the first section of #7
I have not found any other sources that listed this very important information as concisely as had been done here. All the ones I've found are too long winded and unreadable.
I think providing a link to a sub-wiki that lists the planes and airports as they were would be helpful if they can't be put back in. But, overall, these two charts were very important to me and I think critical in understanding what you're purchasing and what's there. To me, this falls directly under "Sometimes a concise summary is appropriate if it is essential to understanding the game or its significance in the industry. " - FlyingsCool ( talk) 01:24, 24 August 2020 (UTC)FlyingsCool - Tom Perry
Hi Eik Corell. The main references you wanted are the following:
In any case, after you intervened in the article, my understanding is that no lists of aircraft should be visible on the article dealing with the video game. BUT... I could create, and I think this should be fine, I could create a list article especially intended to show those lists (the following is an example of such kind of list: List of Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic characters). Just tell me what you think about the above. Kind regards. Kintaro ( talk) 23:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello, you made a few pretty major changes in the article a while back, removing the list of modules citing WP:GAMECRUFT, but since then an IP user has added a pretty lame version back. Would it be appropriate to remove it again? It is quite cluttered and really I doubt anyone cares. HarryKernow (talk) 02:31, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Sometimes I take a look at what other editors in the same IP range as me have been doing and I noticed that Avatar: The Last Airbender – Into the Inferno was in need of some improvement. Please note that I am a different editor from the person you recently reverted. I invite you to review my edits. Also I'm wondering where that Metacritic PlayStation 2 score could possibly have come from. -- 109.76.198.1 ( talk) 08:58, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for helping me roll back the vandal's edits! Tommy has a great username ( talk) 00:15, 4 November 2020 (UTC) |
Hi Eik. I just want to let you know that you should be OK to report the Cancelled Platforms to AIV user whenever they pop up with a new IP. I've seen you typically are very quick at reverting them as well, so thank you for that; it's much appreciated! If you're ever unsure on reporting them, just check their IP geolocation to see if it's in Ireland and that should be enough considering how blatant their edits usually are. (Apologizes if this is patronizing—I'm not sure how familiar you are with AIV, despite you being a much more experienced editor than I am.) Perryprog ( talk) 17:19, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Anyway—your point still stands, and you absolutely have more experience and expertise in this area than I do, although I personally think if an IP is being particularly persistent, it's worth reporting to AIV (as long as it's a documented LTA of course—otherwise they need to be warned). Perryprog ( talk) 01:03, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
I spent a lot of time adding the cast section to the article. I thing that information is extremely important. I think you should undo your edit that removes it. Nosecone33 ( talk) 00:40, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
You're right about the lack of sources, however this is common in articles translated from French and basically all articles on pre-modern history. I moved this text here from the article about the rebellion, where it was definitely WP:UNDUE.
I plan, unless you strenously object, to put this on the talk page as requiring work. There actually are people starting to work on Algerian history now and one of them will possibly know the ancient saga this story is probably from. At that point someone can improve the reference format and take a stand at improving the tone. But it does provide information that likely *can* be sourced. There's plenty more of this in French medieval history if you are looking for work, but it's a bit arbitrary to just delete actual information in just one article IMHO, and I'm requesting that in future you take reference issues you may have about any given articles to the talk page in future; constructive criticism is great. Elinruby ( talk) 01:24, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Eik Corell,
Just a reminder that any time you tag a page for deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/TFD/CFD/etc.), you should post a notice on the talk page of the page creator to inform them. Sometimes, there are steps they can take to eliminate the problem with the page. I recommend using Twinkle because, once you set up your Preferences, the program will automatically post this notification for you, whenever you tag a page. This really speeds things up and makes things easy. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 00:04, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaush until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
I understand you are just trying to remove vandalism but nobody will help improve this page, its disgusting and finding non-wiki sources for this game is impossible while still having a nice page, so please.. help me, T4C deserves better than this crap, I have personally talked to Erik Ashley and Francis Lahaie and you dont have to tell me that; that isn't a source and not reliable.. i already know. you will not find anything great about this game to write home about and yet the fans of this game have to see a dead article. How can we show good information on a games history if all the good history is from old BBS forums that dont exist anymore and are not on wayback machine. so i ask again, instead of deleting please help find a solution. Matthew Smith ( talk)
I was trying to make the List of Samurai Jack Episodes summaries more consistent in length with those of Season 5. Other TV series episodes list in this encyclopedia get more than one or two sentences per episode. Why should this be the exception? 67.169.3.238 ( talk) 08:21, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
For the mostly thankless, and even sometimes criticised, task of dealing with a seemingly innocuous but prolific vandalism farm. CMD ( talk) 04:20, 5 October 2021 (UTC) |
Please, remane page Albatross cx to Korolupy who was the origin name. See the history of the page. See also cs:Korolupy and other languages. Thanks. Petr Tomasovsky ( talk) 15:01, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
For trying. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 18:42, 23 November 2021 (UTC) |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Command: Modern Air Naval Operations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DLC.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:56, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
I see that you spend a lot of time reverting and so destroying additions which are respectful and useful... what is your aim, to discourage valid contributions from other users? I thought Wikipedia was intended as open to voluntary contributions and that no one should be allowed to vandalize proper work made by others. Corrado72 ( talk) 15:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)