This is DementiaGaming's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Hello, DementiaGaming, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for
your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the
help desk, or place {{Help me}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages by clicking
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the
edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing!
KylieTastic (
talk)
19:29, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, DementiaGaming!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
KylieTastic (
talk)
19:29, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
|
Hello, DementiaGaming. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:S/2011 J3, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 20:03, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Carter00000. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2023, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I've added a source for the content. In future, please always add a source when inserting content into page. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Carter00000 ( talk) 16:14, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a
Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in
1990 Manjil–Rudbar earthquake, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Hi DG, thank you for improving the article.All citations on Wikipedia needs to be in a consistent format. All information should be added into a citation when referencing. Kindly see
Wikipedia:Citation templates for further information. You'll also be able to access these citation templates via your the editor toolbar on the source editor mode.
With reference with to the image, that's the editor toolbar. Under Advanced > Special characters > Help > Cite: the citations template is found under this capability. Drop-down option will enable the templates. Do reach out if you need further assistance! Cheers.
Dora the Axe-plorer (
explore)
13:42, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Carter00000 ( talk) 16:42, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Carter00000. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2023, but you didn't provide a reliable source, please provide a source when adding content in the future. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Carter00000 ( talk) 13:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Howdy. I think you might've made a boo boo, when removing collage images from the Decade pages. As I understood it, the RFC decision (since undone) was to delete collage images from only Year pages. Not the Decade or Century pages. GoodDay ( talk) 17:23, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Hey DementiaGaming. I saw your message and I wanted to see if you were interested in the weather. I edit a lot around the topic along with the WikiProject of Weather. My current project is working on a list of every deadly tornado. But, there is thousands of weather articles that need improvement or even creation. Again, I’m not sure if you are interested in editing around the topic, but if you are, feel free to message me. Cheers and keep up the amazing work on Wikipedia! The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 22:08, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
I saw your comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Years#RfC: Removal of image collages. I know discussions can get to be stressful. I hope you feel better. Best regards, Thinker78 (talk) 01:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Your removal of the 2020 collage was unjustified. You can add collages to ongoing decades, there is no rule relating to that. Please take this to the RFC. Indiana6724 ( talk) 01:41, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
I can't prove it. But suspect the IP & Mobile editors, are the same individual. Though I don't know who the individual is. GoodDay ( talk) 19:22, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Please don't remove collages in anticipation of the result of the RfC at WP:YEARS. Wait until it has been closed, and we can act accordingly. 🎄Cremastra 🎄 ( talk) 21:32, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
At this point, it looks like the RFC at Years isn't going to be closed until a consensus has been obtained for keeping the image collages. Suffice it to say, I won't be taking part in the never-ending disputes over which images should or shouldn't be kept in those collages. Kinda sad though, as I suspect 'most' of the keepers aren't interested in the Year, Decade or Millennium pages, bu only in having images. GoodDay ( talk) 14:46, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, DementiaGaming. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2023 Paris explosion, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 09:06, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi DementiaGaming. I'm an administrator, but I'm involved in all the articles and pages where I've observed your behavior, so please take this as a comment coming from a fellow editor.
Please stay civil in your edit summaries and comments. Please do not refer to good-faith contributors as "these idiots" ( diff). It is also uncivil to describe those same attempts as "slobbering over this page" ( diff). Separate from the civility issues, it's probably unwise to describe events in which people have died as ones "that nobody cares about". As far as I'm aware, you've been through the ringer with some debates over the way the years project will act, but please don't take it out on your fellow volunteers. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 03:59, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:DementiaGaming reported by User:33ABGirl (Result: ). Thank you. 33ABGirl ( talk) 15:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
16:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Hey DementiaGaming! So I saw you started Talk:2023#2023 collage picture candidates and I wanted to do a slight alternative proposal on how to handle them. Earlier, I had started nearly a duplicate discussion ( Talk:2023#RFC — Proposal for images to be in article) and it was decided that to solve for an WP:UNDUE issue, we need to separate RfCs or 2 unique consensus'. Here is what I was thinking:
That system would probably work best, as it allows people to put their candidates in without weird timeline style differences and allows for all voices/thoughts on the candidates to be held before the actual collage vote. So, with that idea in mind, I wanted to propose a WP:MUTUAL deletion, where we delete the "discussion" section (my comment as well as your comment) I added to your new collage picture candidates discussion and we convert your candidate discussion into that first RfC. It is a long process that I am proposing, but given the complexity of the recent RfC on collages, it is best to have that long of a process (i.e. 2 separate 30-day (at least) long discussions). Thoughts on this? The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 04:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello DementiaGaming. I was wondering why are you removing collages. Also, where is the discussion you mention in the edit summaries? Regards, Thinker78 (talk) 07:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
I've reverted your mass collage removals. You don't get to do a WP:FAITACCOMPLI by systematically introducing your desired state across this many articles, especially not after an RfC which decided to keep the collages. The collages are illustrative and each complements the text on the page it is on in some way. Some do it better, some a bit worse. Please discuss each and every one of the collages separately on respective talk pages, point to concrete issues and identify ways to improve each and every collage, seek input, and take your time with it. That is what is consistent with the result of the RfC, not what you have done. I support the collages and none of the collages have such critical problems to warrant wholesale removal. Don't take this the wrong way. Sincerely— Alalch E. 17:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
"Given the significantly wider scale of this discussion, any editor wishing to restore them may do so."You're removing material using edit summaries such as the "style of collage is under its own discussion" which as far as I can tell is not true. gobonobo + c 20:53, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
restore something where you know there has been a discussion, of which the outcome has not yet been agreed. That's not the description of the situation that I agree with. It would need to be a discussion that involves removal, and a discussion that ostensibly only involves changes but not removal does not necessitate removal while the outcome is being determined. — Alalch E. 16:08, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
deliberately intend[ing] to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose. 🌺 Cremastra ( talk) 02:21, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Do you think it belongs there? I noticed how in the past you removed entries that weren't popular until much later from their release year articles, such as removing Wikipedia from 2001. Would you have done the same for Roblox on the 2006 article? 35.141.142.199 ( talk) 22:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Collapsed
aspersions; this is currently at
WP:ANI.
|
---|
I am really happy the Wikipedia community doesn't let the encyclopedia be vandalized and destroyed by malevolent actors such as you. I appreciate that your vandalism was undone by consensus and hope that it serves as a lesson for you to never take destructive decisions for this marvelous project again. If you still feel pulsions to destroy parts of the encyclopedia,
|
This is DementiaGaming's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Hello, DementiaGaming, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for
your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the
help desk, or place {{Help me}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages by clicking
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the
edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing!
KylieTastic (
talk)
19:29, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, DementiaGaming!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
KylieTastic (
talk)
19:29, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
|
Hello, DementiaGaming. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:S/2011 J3, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 20:03, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Carter00000. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2023, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I've added a source for the content. In future, please always add a source when inserting content into page. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Carter00000 ( talk) 16:14, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a
Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in
1990 Manjil–Rudbar earthquake, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Hi DG, thank you for improving the article.All citations on Wikipedia needs to be in a consistent format. All information should be added into a citation when referencing. Kindly see
Wikipedia:Citation templates for further information. You'll also be able to access these citation templates via your the editor toolbar on the source editor mode.
With reference with to the image, that's the editor toolbar. Under Advanced > Special characters > Help > Cite: the citations template is found under this capability. Drop-down option will enable the templates. Do reach out if you need further assistance! Cheers.
Dora the Axe-plorer (
explore)
13:42, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Carter00000 ( talk) 16:42, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Carter00000. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2023, but you didn't provide a reliable source, please provide a source when adding content in the future. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Carter00000 ( talk) 13:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Howdy. I think you might've made a boo boo, when removing collage images from the Decade pages. As I understood it, the RFC decision (since undone) was to delete collage images from only Year pages. Not the Decade or Century pages. GoodDay ( talk) 17:23, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Hey DementiaGaming. I saw your message and I wanted to see if you were interested in the weather. I edit a lot around the topic along with the WikiProject of Weather. My current project is working on a list of every deadly tornado. But, there is thousands of weather articles that need improvement or even creation. Again, I’m not sure if you are interested in editing around the topic, but if you are, feel free to message me. Cheers and keep up the amazing work on Wikipedia! The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 22:08, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
I saw your comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Years#RfC: Removal of image collages. I know discussions can get to be stressful. I hope you feel better. Best regards, Thinker78 (talk) 01:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Your removal of the 2020 collage was unjustified. You can add collages to ongoing decades, there is no rule relating to that. Please take this to the RFC. Indiana6724 ( talk) 01:41, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
I can't prove it. But suspect the IP & Mobile editors, are the same individual. Though I don't know who the individual is. GoodDay ( talk) 19:22, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Please don't remove collages in anticipation of the result of the RfC at WP:YEARS. Wait until it has been closed, and we can act accordingly. 🎄Cremastra 🎄 ( talk) 21:32, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
At this point, it looks like the RFC at Years isn't going to be closed until a consensus has been obtained for keeping the image collages. Suffice it to say, I won't be taking part in the never-ending disputes over which images should or shouldn't be kept in those collages. Kinda sad though, as I suspect 'most' of the keepers aren't interested in the Year, Decade or Millennium pages, bu only in having images. GoodDay ( talk) 14:46, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, DementiaGaming. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2023 Paris explosion, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 09:06, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi DementiaGaming. I'm an administrator, but I'm involved in all the articles and pages where I've observed your behavior, so please take this as a comment coming from a fellow editor.
Please stay civil in your edit summaries and comments. Please do not refer to good-faith contributors as "these idiots" ( diff). It is also uncivil to describe those same attempts as "slobbering over this page" ( diff). Separate from the civility issues, it's probably unwise to describe events in which people have died as ones "that nobody cares about". As far as I'm aware, you've been through the ringer with some debates over the way the years project will act, but please don't take it out on your fellow volunteers. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 03:59, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:DementiaGaming reported by User:33ABGirl (Result: ). Thank you. 33ABGirl ( talk) 15:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
16:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Hey DementiaGaming! So I saw you started Talk:2023#2023 collage picture candidates and I wanted to do a slight alternative proposal on how to handle them. Earlier, I had started nearly a duplicate discussion ( Talk:2023#RFC — Proposal for images to be in article) and it was decided that to solve for an WP:UNDUE issue, we need to separate RfCs or 2 unique consensus'. Here is what I was thinking:
That system would probably work best, as it allows people to put their candidates in without weird timeline style differences and allows for all voices/thoughts on the candidates to be held before the actual collage vote. So, with that idea in mind, I wanted to propose a WP:MUTUAL deletion, where we delete the "discussion" section (my comment as well as your comment) I added to your new collage picture candidates discussion and we convert your candidate discussion into that first RfC. It is a long process that I am proposing, but given the complexity of the recent RfC on collages, it is best to have that long of a process (i.e. 2 separate 30-day (at least) long discussions). Thoughts on this? The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 04:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello DementiaGaming. I was wondering why are you removing collages. Also, where is the discussion you mention in the edit summaries? Regards, Thinker78 (talk) 07:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
I've reverted your mass collage removals. You don't get to do a WP:FAITACCOMPLI by systematically introducing your desired state across this many articles, especially not after an RfC which decided to keep the collages. The collages are illustrative and each complements the text on the page it is on in some way. Some do it better, some a bit worse. Please discuss each and every one of the collages separately on respective talk pages, point to concrete issues and identify ways to improve each and every collage, seek input, and take your time with it. That is what is consistent with the result of the RfC, not what you have done. I support the collages and none of the collages have such critical problems to warrant wholesale removal. Don't take this the wrong way. Sincerely— Alalch E. 17:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
"Given the significantly wider scale of this discussion, any editor wishing to restore them may do so."You're removing material using edit summaries such as the "style of collage is under its own discussion" which as far as I can tell is not true. gobonobo + c 20:53, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
restore something where you know there has been a discussion, of which the outcome has not yet been agreed. That's not the description of the situation that I agree with. It would need to be a discussion that involves removal, and a discussion that ostensibly only involves changes but not removal does not necessitate removal while the outcome is being determined. — Alalch E. 16:08, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
deliberately intend[ing] to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose. 🌺 Cremastra ( talk) 02:21, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Do you think it belongs there? I noticed how in the past you removed entries that weren't popular until much later from their release year articles, such as removing Wikipedia from 2001. Would you have done the same for Roblox on the 2006 article? 35.141.142.199 ( talk) 22:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Collapsed
aspersions; this is currently at
WP:ANI.
|
---|
I am really happy the Wikipedia community doesn't let the encyclopedia be vandalized and destroyed by malevolent actors such as you. I appreciate that your vandalism was undone by consensus and hope that it serves as a lesson for you to never take destructive decisions for this marvelous project again. If you still feel pulsions to destroy parts of the encyclopedia,
|