Chris Troutman (
talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! Welcome the 2024. Wishing you a happy and fruitful 2024 with good health and your wishes come true! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! May the 2024 go well for you.
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{
subst:
User:Pratyya Ghosh/Happy New Year}} to their talk page with a Happy New Year message.
Davey2010,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Katniss
May the odds be ever in your favor ♥
05:51, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Happy
New Year!
Send New Year cheer by adding {{
subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.
CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:58, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy New Year! |
Hello Davey2010: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary
blisters. |
Davey2010,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
—
Moops ⋠
T⋡
02:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠ T⋡ 02:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Greetings! I have restored this deleted subject, which you have previously edited, on the expectation that new sources will be found postdating the 2020 deletion of the article. If you are still interested in this subject, please add to this effort. Cheers! BD2412 T 14:47, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
I noticed you participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lil Snupe (2nd nomination). The article has been created for a third time, but it's mostly tributes after his death in 2013. Would you mind looking at the article? I'm wondering if it needs another AFD. Thank you. Magnolia677 ( talk) 19:04, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
I was sorry to see that you didn't approve of my decision to close the split discussion at Talk:Waterloo Road (TV series). As I stated in the result, revisiting the discussion could be fruitful after the BBC has made some announcement on the future of the series, and that might be an opportune time for you to open a new split discussion, if you think that is the best way forward. _ MB190417_ ( talk) 12:39, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I have posted Talk:Temu (company)#Request for more clean up and removing flag to ask for fixes to the page about Temu (company), the most downloaded app in the United States the last few months. [1] These tiny fixes address the last issues needed to remove the flag. . I have a conflict of interest as an employee of Temu and I would very much appreciate it if you might have time to take a look. Since you are a member of the WikiProject for Internet Culture, I thought you might possibly be interested in this internet cultural moment. [2], [3]. This page is in need of careful expansion in compliance with Wikipedia policy (and there is plenty of press coverage) but getting rid of the last tiny policy violations is a good place to start.
Thanks in advance for your consideration! Snowy2000 ( talk) 02:09, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter
This newsletter includes two key updates about the Editing team's work:
Talk pages project
The Editing team is nearly finished with this first phase of the Talk pages project. Nearly all new features are available now in the Beta Feature for Discussion tools.
It will show information about how active a discussion is, such as the date of the most recent comment. There will soon be a new "Add topic" button. You will be able to turn them off at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion. Please tell them what you think.
An A/B test for Discussion tools on the mobile site has finished. Editors were more successful with Discussion tools. The Editing team is enabling these features for all editors on the mobile site.
New Project: Edit Check
The Editing team is beginning a project to help new editors of Wikipedia. It will help people identify some problems before they click "Publish changes". The first tool will encourage people to add references when they add new content. Please watch that page for more information. You can join a conference call on 3 March 2023 to learn more.
– Whatamidoing (WMF) ( talk) 18:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Fix The Kings Ferry – Davey2010 Talk 16:54, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
You have recently made edits related to articles about
living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about
living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see
Wikipedia:Contentious topics.
Sideswipe9th (
talk)
23:44, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Which part of that's what commons is for are you having trouble with? Murgatroyd49 ( talk) 14:37, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Murgatroyd49 (
talk)
12:04, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi Davey2010 - just wanted to make sure you knew that when I said "you" I didn't mean you personally. I am just a little concerned with the current trend of people (imho needlessly) deleting articles all over the place. Someone just tried to delete Automotive timeline navboxes, I am sure a bunch of bus articles are next for the chopping block. Usually deletion discussions are not noticed until three editors have voted to delete, and to undelete can be near impossible. Mr.choppers | ✎ 00:05, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Please stop calling other editors snowflakes, as you did here and here. Consider this a formal warning. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 15:22, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Alexander Dash – Davey2010 Talk 17:36, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Please familiarise your self with
WP:SANDWICH that states: Multiple images can be staggered right and left. However, avoid sandwiching text between two images that face each other; or between an image and infobox.
Addung images immediately to the left of the infobox as you are seeking to do is contrary to this section of the Manual of Style.
Kermelei (
talk)
02:36, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
@ Davey2010 To avoid potentially triggering WP:3RR and to hopefully get a bit of clarity, could you please explain your rationale in reverting this and so many other bus articles' images to prior versions?
I'll outline mine first: I personally believe that Wikipedia pages of buses should have, if they exist, in-service photos of the buses with their first operator and in as best physical state as possible. In this article's case, I say preserved buses stand as an adequate equivalent, too. As-new photographs (or photos in as-new condition) highlight elements of the bus as they were intended by the manufacturer shortly after it rolled out the factory. In my opinion, they also help provide context for the history of the bus type - i.e. by demonstrating them with the operator they were most commonly used by at the time they were relatively new.
I don't see why, therefore, we seemingly can't part with the images as they now stand here. Why the insistence of sticking with photos from 2006-2009 and onwards from when the buses were near the end of their service life/with second or third-hand operators, when new photos can be made available that better demonstrates them? And please, tell me what constitutes "fine", " better" or " no issue" in your edit summaries? What precedence does the photo of the back of a Paladin Dart have over a photo of a one-in-four Paladin Atlantean in this article?
Another point that I'd like to pick up on is that as a regular mobile user (i.e. both through browser on iPad and Wikipedia app on my phone), I'm very mindful of making these pages accessible for other mobile users. As @ Kermelei also probably disputes, this image reorienting you have undertaken with this article, as well as on, say, Alexander ALX400 (why have you added a new image, by the way?), is causing quite a bit of sandwiching of the main body of text. I'll admit, I've done some arguably weird orienting of images on this article before, but that was to avoid sandwiching text between image and infobox and demonstrate the Atlantean rebody under its own heading. I'd just be mindful about that as you go on.
Again, all I ask is that you explain what it is you are trying to do without just leaving it in the edit summary as "past images were fine" or something as vague as that. What's the rationale, here? Why not allow these new images to stand? Hullian111 ( talk) 06:37, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi,
At this point, this is only just a suggestion. While Wikipedia is not censored, and we welcome lively collegiate debate, when commenting at AN/I, we tend to focus on calling out actions or behaviors. And calling someone a "coward", sounds like an attack to the person, and so, would seem to cross that line, and I'd like to respectfully suggest you might want to strike or refactor your comments. - jc37 00:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Did not mean to rollback you. Fat fingers + handheld device make for a poor combination. TrangaBellam ( talk) 14:27, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:1980 West Midlands Fire Service Dennis Dart.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:02, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I see you removed a reference from John Wells (Royal Navy officer) with the edit summary "rm spammy author". What does this actually mean? I'm not immediately seeing why this author, who in this instance is published [5] by the academic Boydell & Brewer, should be removed? Happy to be corrected on why the author shouldn't be used if that's so, but please do a full job removing references if you're going to do it. Edits like [6] that remove the reference but not the inline citation just make the text/reference more confusing. Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk) 18:06, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
XAM2175
(T)
12:36, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Scottywong. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Scottywong/Evidence. Please add your evidence by June 21, 2023, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Scottywong/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 19:21, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —
Ingenuity (
talk •
contribs)
19:33, 7 June 2023 (UTC)the dumbest thing in historythat
fixing obvious errors in the formatting of source code requires engaging in ten-year-long arguments; I don't know how you managed to read my entire comment completely backwards as a criticism of doing so. jp× g 13:06, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Comment While Davey's response was inappropriate, i would say that David Eppstein's comment was not the best i've seen from him about another user's edits. I don't think that Davey deserves this block, given that he removed his offensive response.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 19:51, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
MOS:LAYOUTEL is the relevant portion @ 10mmsocket is applying. XAM2175 (T) 15:17, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Davey, I share your irritation at the community's inability to deal with 'acceptable' incivility as was demonstrated repeatedly at that thread. You know what I mean... as long as no naughty words or mean names are used, it's okay to implicitly call someone a liar or laugh in their face while reverting them. I'm also more than a little annoyed right now; being gaslit is not a pleasant experience. But I think it might be best to step away for a few hours and maybe drink some tea in real life. I might do the same. I hope you have a pleasant Tuesday. LEPRICAVARK ( talk) 01:13, 13 June 2023 (UTC) |
Regarding this comment: I believe the editor was apologizing to the arbitration committee that the committee is now involved in this dispute, rather than it being handled through discussion elsewhere. isaacl ( talk) 22:25, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW/Evidence. Please add your evidence by June 30, 2023, which is when the evidence phase closes. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Sorry Davey2010 didn't mean to come of as passive aggressive. I'm 20k edits deep into clearing the category and my summaries have become formulaic. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆ transmissions∆ ° co-ords° 20:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
![]() | |
Eight years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:21, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I'm writing about two edits you made at "Wilts & Dorset" last month.
The span tags that you removed were produced by substituting Template:Anchor, and were there (in that article's case) to keep section links alive after the section names were changed. There is no need to restore the tags now as no such section liks exist (the only one that existed I changed earlier), but I wished to let you know that there are tags like that.
I will be grateful if you would think of that possiblity in the future, and if possible, contribute to raising awareness of such tags among CW project members. Thank you. YTRK ( talk) 10:22, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Davey2010,
I didn't mean for my relisting comment to be discouraging. This article could well deserve to be deleted. But it is so popular, with readers as well as vandals and sockpuppets, that if/when it is deleted, I expect it to be recreated again fairly soon. There is a stronger case for future CSD G4 deletion taggings if there was substantial support for an article's deletion and that just wasn't present yet in this AFD discussion. Sometimes it takes one or two relistings to bring an AFD discussion to the attention of a larger group of editors. But my relisting shouldn't be taken as a sign that I thought the article should be Kept or that you didn't make a good case. I usually relist when there is a deadlock of strong opinions (50/50) or when the participation in the AFD is low which can mean that the decision is later contested.
Perhaps this article warrants a 2nd AFD in the near future, that certainly has happened before. Thanks for your participation at AFD. Liz Read! Talk! 22:29, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
The proposed decision for the AlisonW case has been posted. Statements regarding the proposed decision are welcome at the talk page. Please note that comments must be made in your own section. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 15:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
The arbitration case Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW has been closed, and the final decision is viewable at the case page. The following remedy has been enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 17:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SmallCat dispute. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SmallCat dispute/Evidence. Please add your evidence by August 4, 2023, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SmallCat dispute/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:07, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
List of airline codes (A) – Davey2010 Talk 18:32, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
There is already an ongoing discussion at the talkpage. Go there instead of constantly reverting the main image. There is absolutely no need for the main pic to be of the most current generation, it's just a habit of some of our younger editors to add the newest generation of everything. WP:CARPIX has been the policy for ages. Mr.choppers | ✎ 16:50, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello Davey, I see your edits, and the banner posted, but can't find specific suggestions to allow revisions to change the page to remove the banner - could you please help with specifics? Re: NCEI TechwriterII ( talk) 20:37, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
WikiProject Eurovision
Dear Eurovision Wikipedian, Our project pages have undergone a full color change and now resemble the
Swedish flag
The new Archive tab will make it easier to find and view just about all of our archived pages. It is a work in progress. Issue 49 of the newsletter is currently pending delivery. While we await that, you can now receive daily and/or weekly Eurovision news updates. Sign up below have a wonderful week.
Cordially, |
Ktkvtsh (talk) 05:06, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
→
Issue 49 ←
Headlines
| |||||
At the time of publication the project statistics were as follows | |||||
Number of articles | Unassessed articles | Good articles | A-class articles | Featured articles | Number of members |
7263 ![]() |
0 ![]() |
171 ![]() |
0 ![]() |
4 ![]() |
105 ![]() |
•
HOME •
TALK •
NEWSDESK •
UNSUBSCRIBE •
ARCHIVES • |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:53, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The proposed decision in the SmallCat dispute has been posted. You are invited to review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 10:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
I had added a film called Inheritance to Inheritance (disambiguation)
You removed it, citing non-notability. Many other "Inheritance" entries remain that appear to me of equivalent notability. Is there a guideline for notability for disambiguation pages I can reference for my future edits?
Vipavipa ( talk) 13:24, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
It's sad how many articles have been deleted due to this human believing in Existence ≠ Notability. I'm sure your existence is notable to your parents but everyone else on the internet doesn't give two craps. Should we delete you for not being notable to the masses? You and the rest of the moderation team are hacks for removing all of those pages of unused/abandoned highways. I'm glad I stopped donating to Wikipedia, we need another form of documentation for the world. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.172.133.118 ( talk) 20:36, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Hey, would you kindly telt me why you reverted my Battle of Castellón edit? ... GELongstreet ( talk) 17:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
<br>
additions but I now see they actually didn't so apologies for this,<br>
they're on new lines respectively anyway?, Thanks –
Davey2010
Talk
18:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Hey Davey, I appreciate you fixing some of my mistakes as a new Wikipedia editor. Can I ask, why did you remove the source I added to Umalakotid? I looked at MOS:DABNOLINK and it didn't seem to apply to that article/source. Is there a rule not to add sources to (relatively) trivial geographical data like that? Thanks. Spacemarine22 ( talk) 15:29, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
1) Please do not revert blindly 2) Please compare revisions before reverting! Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:10, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Naug article - edited 9/10/23 1919 – Davey2010 Talk 18:19, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
I am probably wasting my time, but again can you please stop adding images that are in contravention of polict, namely. delete image causing sandwiching. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Buses/Archive 2#Images for more detail. Your response there of So then expand the articles? did not address the issue. Many editors have advised you that your position on images is against policy. Please have a read of the policy and understand why it exists. Kermelei ( talk) 00:23, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Happy birthday! Hi Davey2010! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:09, 22 October 2023 (UTC) |
![]() |
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
→
Issue 50 ←
Headlines
| |||||
At the time of publication the project statistics were as follows | |||||
Number of articles | Unassessed articles | Good articles | A-class articles | Featured articles | Number of members |
7263 ![]() |
0 ![]() |
178 ![]() |
0 ![]() |
4 ![]() |
108 ![]() |
•
HOME •
TALK •
NEWSDESK •
UNSUBSCRIBE •
ARCHIVES • |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 10:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi Davey2010, I asked you back in 2020 about how to "go retro" by using the Arial font on Wikipedia that was there before 2014 or so. Now on talk pages and Wikipedia namespace pages the Georgia font is back. Is there any code I can add or whatever (anything I can do) to revert to Arial? Thanks from Nearly but not perfect ( talk) 18:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Sent by NPP Coordination using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
A very happy Christmas and New Year to you! |
![]() |
|
Have a great Christmas, and may 2024 bring you joy, happiness – and no trolls, vandals or visits from
Krampus!
|
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! |
Hello Davey2010, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
-- Ozzie10aaaa ( talk) 22:30, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy Holidays! |
Hi, Davey2010! Have a happy and safe season, and a blessed new year!! Holiday cheers, -- Discographer ( talk) 23:23, 20 December 2023 (UTC) |
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! |
Hello Davey2010, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
★Trekker (
talk) is wishing you
Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user
Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
★Trekker ( talk) 12:15, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! |
Hello Davey2010, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:48, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
BOZ (
talk) is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer. :) BOZ ( talk) 00:16, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Onel5969 TT me 02:55, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello Davey2010: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 04:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 04:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
★Trekker (
talk) is wishing you
Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's
Solstice or
Christmas,
Diwali,
Hogmanay,
Hanukkah,
Lenaia,
Festivus or even the
Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:WereSpielChequers/Dec15b}} to your friends' talk pages.
★Trekker ( talk) 10:02, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! |
Hello Davey2010, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
I wish that you may have a very Happy Holiday!
Whether you celebrate
Christmas,
Hanukkah,
Kwanzaa,
Hogmanay,
Festivus or your hemisphere's
Solstice, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! May the New Year provide you joy and fulfillment! Thanks for everything you do here.
Jerium (
talk)
17:47, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:Coffee/Holidays}} to your fellow editors' talk pages.
Have a happy and safe holidayz :)
Jerium (
talk)
17:47, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
|
|
The 12 Days of Wikipedia
|
Thanks so much Chris, I wish you and yours a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year, Many Thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk 17:53, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
I hope that you are able to find holiday cheer this year and are able to spend time with loved ones. Merry Christmas, Davey! Wishing you the best in 2024 as well.
TheSandDoctor
Talk
07:20, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello Davey2010: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, -- Dustfreeworld ( talk) 12:42, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
RV ( talk) 17:37, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Davey2010! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T)
19:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Chris Troutman (
talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! Welcome the 2024. Wishing you a happy and fruitful 2024 with good health and your wishes come true! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! May the 2024 go well for you.
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{
subst:
User:Pratyya Ghosh/Happy New Year}} to their talk page with a Happy New Year message.
Davey2010,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Katniss
May the odds be ever in your favor ♥
05:51, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Happy
New Year!
Send New Year cheer by adding {{
subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.
CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:58, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy New Year! |
Hello Davey2010: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary
blisters. |
Davey2010,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
—
Moops ⋠
T⋡
02:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠ T⋡ 02:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Greetings! I have restored this deleted subject, which you have previously edited, on the expectation that new sources will be found postdating the 2020 deletion of the article. If you are still interested in this subject, please add to this effort. Cheers! BD2412 T 14:47, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
I noticed you participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lil Snupe (2nd nomination). The article has been created for a third time, but it's mostly tributes after his death in 2013. Would you mind looking at the article? I'm wondering if it needs another AFD. Thank you. Magnolia677 ( talk) 19:04, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
I was sorry to see that you didn't approve of my decision to close the split discussion at Talk:Waterloo Road (TV series). As I stated in the result, revisiting the discussion could be fruitful after the BBC has made some announcement on the future of the series, and that might be an opportune time for you to open a new split discussion, if you think that is the best way forward. _ MB190417_ ( talk) 12:39, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I have posted Talk:Temu (company)#Request for more clean up and removing flag to ask for fixes to the page about Temu (company), the most downloaded app in the United States the last few months. [1] These tiny fixes address the last issues needed to remove the flag. . I have a conflict of interest as an employee of Temu and I would very much appreciate it if you might have time to take a look. Since you are a member of the WikiProject for Internet Culture, I thought you might possibly be interested in this internet cultural moment. [2], [3]. This page is in need of careful expansion in compliance with Wikipedia policy (and there is plenty of press coverage) but getting rid of the last tiny policy violations is a good place to start.
Thanks in advance for your consideration! Snowy2000 ( talk) 02:09, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter
This newsletter includes two key updates about the Editing team's work:
Talk pages project
The Editing team is nearly finished with this first phase of the Talk pages project. Nearly all new features are available now in the Beta Feature for Discussion tools.
It will show information about how active a discussion is, such as the date of the most recent comment. There will soon be a new "Add topic" button. You will be able to turn them off at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion. Please tell them what you think.
An A/B test for Discussion tools on the mobile site has finished. Editors were more successful with Discussion tools. The Editing team is enabling these features for all editors on the mobile site.
New Project: Edit Check
The Editing team is beginning a project to help new editors of Wikipedia. It will help people identify some problems before they click "Publish changes". The first tool will encourage people to add references when they add new content. Please watch that page for more information. You can join a conference call on 3 March 2023 to learn more.
– Whatamidoing (WMF) ( talk) 18:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Fix The Kings Ferry – Davey2010 Talk 16:54, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
You have recently made edits related to articles about
living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about
living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see
Wikipedia:Contentious topics.
Sideswipe9th (
talk)
23:44, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Which part of that's what commons is for are you having trouble with? Murgatroyd49 ( talk) 14:37, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Murgatroyd49 (
talk)
12:04, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi Davey2010 - just wanted to make sure you knew that when I said "you" I didn't mean you personally. I am just a little concerned with the current trend of people (imho needlessly) deleting articles all over the place. Someone just tried to delete Automotive timeline navboxes, I am sure a bunch of bus articles are next for the chopping block. Usually deletion discussions are not noticed until three editors have voted to delete, and to undelete can be near impossible. Mr.choppers | ✎ 00:05, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Please stop calling other editors snowflakes, as you did here and here. Consider this a formal warning. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 15:22, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Alexander Dash – Davey2010 Talk 17:36, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Please familiarise your self with
WP:SANDWICH that states: Multiple images can be staggered right and left. However, avoid sandwiching text between two images that face each other; or between an image and infobox.
Addung images immediately to the left of the infobox as you are seeking to do is contrary to this section of the Manual of Style.
Kermelei (
talk)
02:36, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
@ Davey2010 To avoid potentially triggering WP:3RR and to hopefully get a bit of clarity, could you please explain your rationale in reverting this and so many other bus articles' images to prior versions?
I'll outline mine first: I personally believe that Wikipedia pages of buses should have, if they exist, in-service photos of the buses with their first operator and in as best physical state as possible. In this article's case, I say preserved buses stand as an adequate equivalent, too. As-new photographs (or photos in as-new condition) highlight elements of the bus as they were intended by the manufacturer shortly after it rolled out the factory. In my opinion, they also help provide context for the history of the bus type - i.e. by demonstrating them with the operator they were most commonly used by at the time they were relatively new.
I don't see why, therefore, we seemingly can't part with the images as they now stand here. Why the insistence of sticking with photos from 2006-2009 and onwards from when the buses were near the end of their service life/with second or third-hand operators, when new photos can be made available that better demonstrates them? And please, tell me what constitutes "fine", " better" or " no issue" in your edit summaries? What precedence does the photo of the back of a Paladin Dart have over a photo of a one-in-four Paladin Atlantean in this article?
Another point that I'd like to pick up on is that as a regular mobile user (i.e. both through browser on iPad and Wikipedia app on my phone), I'm very mindful of making these pages accessible for other mobile users. As @ Kermelei also probably disputes, this image reorienting you have undertaken with this article, as well as on, say, Alexander ALX400 (why have you added a new image, by the way?), is causing quite a bit of sandwiching of the main body of text. I'll admit, I've done some arguably weird orienting of images on this article before, but that was to avoid sandwiching text between image and infobox and demonstrate the Atlantean rebody under its own heading. I'd just be mindful about that as you go on.
Again, all I ask is that you explain what it is you are trying to do without just leaving it in the edit summary as "past images were fine" or something as vague as that. What's the rationale, here? Why not allow these new images to stand? Hullian111 ( talk) 06:37, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi,
At this point, this is only just a suggestion. While Wikipedia is not censored, and we welcome lively collegiate debate, when commenting at AN/I, we tend to focus on calling out actions or behaviors. And calling someone a "coward", sounds like an attack to the person, and so, would seem to cross that line, and I'd like to respectfully suggest you might want to strike or refactor your comments. - jc37 00:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Did not mean to rollback you. Fat fingers + handheld device make for a poor combination. TrangaBellam ( talk) 14:27, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:1980 West Midlands Fire Service Dennis Dart.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:02, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I see you removed a reference from John Wells (Royal Navy officer) with the edit summary "rm spammy author". What does this actually mean? I'm not immediately seeing why this author, who in this instance is published [5] by the academic Boydell & Brewer, should be removed? Happy to be corrected on why the author shouldn't be used if that's so, but please do a full job removing references if you're going to do it. Edits like [6] that remove the reference but not the inline citation just make the text/reference more confusing. Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk) 18:06, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
XAM2175
(T)
12:36, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Scottywong. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Scottywong/Evidence. Please add your evidence by June 21, 2023, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Scottywong/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 19:21, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —
Ingenuity (
talk •
contribs)
19:33, 7 June 2023 (UTC)the dumbest thing in historythat
fixing obvious errors in the formatting of source code requires engaging in ten-year-long arguments; I don't know how you managed to read my entire comment completely backwards as a criticism of doing so. jp× g 13:06, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Comment While Davey's response was inappropriate, i would say that David Eppstein's comment was not the best i've seen from him about another user's edits. I don't think that Davey deserves this block, given that he removed his offensive response.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 19:51, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
MOS:LAYOUTEL is the relevant portion @ 10mmsocket is applying. XAM2175 (T) 15:17, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Davey, I share your irritation at the community's inability to deal with 'acceptable' incivility as was demonstrated repeatedly at that thread. You know what I mean... as long as no naughty words or mean names are used, it's okay to implicitly call someone a liar or laugh in their face while reverting them. I'm also more than a little annoyed right now; being gaslit is not a pleasant experience. But I think it might be best to step away for a few hours and maybe drink some tea in real life. I might do the same. I hope you have a pleasant Tuesday. LEPRICAVARK ( talk) 01:13, 13 June 2023 (UTC) |
Regarding this comment: I believe the editor was apologizing to the arbitration committee that the committee is now involved in this dispute, rather than it being handled through discussion elsewhere. isaacl ( talk) 22:25, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW/Evidence. Please add your evidence by June 30, 2023, which is when the evidence phase closes. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Sorry Davey2010 didn't mean to come of as passive aggressive. I'm 20k edits deep into clearing the category and my summaries have become formulaic. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆ transmissions∆ ° co-ords° 20:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
![]() | |
Eight years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:21, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I'm writing about two edits you made at "Wilts & Dorset" last month.
The span tags that you removed were produced by substituting Template:Anchor, and were there (in that article's case) to keep section links alive after the section names were changed. There is no need to restore the tags now as no such section liks exist (the only one that existed I changed earlier), but I wished to let you know that there are tags like that.
I will be grateful if you would think of that possiblity in the future, and if possible, contribute to raising awareness of such tags among CW project members. Thank you. YTRK ( talk) 10:22, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Davey2010,
I didn't mean for my relisting comment to be discouraging. This article could well deserve to be deleted. But it is so popular, with readers as well as vandals and sockpuppets, that if/when it is deleted, I expect it to be recreated again fairly soon. There is a stronger case for future CSD G4 deletion taggings if there was substantial support for an article's deletion and that just wasn't present yet in this AFD discussion. Sometimes it takes one or two relistings to bring an AFD discussion to the attention of a larger group of editors. But my relisting shouldn't be taken as a sign that I thought the article should be Kept or that you didn't make a good case. I usually relist when there is a deadlock of strong opinions (50/50) or when the participation in the AFD is low which can mean that the decision is later contested.
Perhaps this article warrants a 2nd AFD in the near future, that certainly has happened before. Thanks for your participation at AFD. Liz Read! Talk! 22:29, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
The proposed decision for the AlisonW case has been posted. Statements regarding the proposed decision are welcome at the talk page. Please note that comments must be made in your own section. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 15:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
The arbitration case Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW has been closed, and the final decision is viewable at the case page. The following remedy has been enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 17:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SmallCat dispute. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SmallCat dispute/Evidence. Please add your evidence by August 4, 2023, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SmallCat dispute/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:07, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
List of airline codes (A) – Davey2010 Talk 18:32, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
There is already an ongoing discussion at the talkpage. Go there instead of constantly reverting the main image. There is absolutely no need for the main pic to be of the most current generation, it's just a habit of some of our younger editors to add the newest generation of everything. WP:CARPIX has been the policy for ages. Mr.choppers | ✎ 16:50, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello Davey, I see your edits, and the banner posted, but can't find specific suggestions to allow revisions to change the page to remove the banner - could you please help with specifics? Re: NCEI TechwriterII ( talk) 20:37, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
WikiProject Eurovision
Dear Eurovision Wikipedian, Our project pages have undergone a full color change and now resemble the
Swedish flag
The new Archive tab will make it easier to find and view just about all of our archived pages. It is a work in progress. Issue 49 of the newsletter is currently pending delivery. While we await that, you can now receive daily and/or weekly Eurovision news updates. Sign up below have a wonderful week.
Cordially, |
Ktkvtsh (talk) 05:06, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
→
Issue 49 ←
Headlines
| |||||
At the time of publication the project statistics were as follows | |||||
Number of articles | Unassessed articles | Good articles | A-class articles | Featured articles | Number of members |
7263 ![]() |
0 ![]() |
171 ![]() |
0 ![]() |
4 ![]() |
105 ![]() |
•
HOME •
TALK •
NEWSDESK •
UNSUBSCRIBE •
ARCHIVES • |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:53, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The proposed decision in the SmallCat dispute has been posted. You are invited to review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 10:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
I had added a film called Inheritance to Inheritance (disambiguation)
You removed it, citing non-notability. Many other "Inheritance" entries remain that appear to me of equivalent notability. Is there a guideline for notability for disambiguation pages I can reference for my future edits?
Vipavipa ( talk) 13:24, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
It's sad how many articles have been deleted due to this human believing in Existence ≠ Notability. I'm sure your existence is notable to your parents but everyone else on the internet doesn't give two craps. Should we delete you for not being notable to the masses? You and the rest of the moderation team are hacks for removing all of those pages of unused/abandoned highways. I'm glad I stopped donating to Wikipedia, we need another form of documentation for the world. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.172.133.118 ( talk) 20:36, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Hey, would you kindly telt me why you reverted my Battle of Castellón edit? ... GELongstreet ( talk) 17:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
<br>
additions but I now see they actually didn't so apologies for this,<br>
they're on new lines respectively anyway?, Thanks –
Davey2010
Talk
18:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Hey Davey, I appreciate you fixing some of my mistakes as a new Wikipedia editor. Can I ask, why did you remove the source I added to Umalakotid? I looked at MOS:DABNOLINK and it didn't seem to apply to that article/source. Is there a rule not to add sources to (relatively) trivial geographical data like that? Thanks. Spacemarine22 ( talk) 15:29, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
1) Please do not revert blindly 2) Please compare revisions before reverting! Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:10, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Naug article - edited 9/10/23 1919 – Davey2010 Talk 18:19, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
I am probably wasting my time, but again can you please stop adding images that are in contravention of polict, namely. delete image causing sandwiching. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Buses/Archive 2#Images for more detail. Your response there of So then expand the articles? did not address the issue. Many editors have advised you that your position on images is against policy. Please have a read of the policy and understand why it exists. Kermelei ( talk) 00:23, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Happy birthday! Hi Davey2010! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:09, 22 October 2023 (UTC) |
![]() |
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
→
Issue 50 ←
Headlines
| |||||
At the time of publication the project statistics were as follows | |||||
Number of articles | Unassessed articles | Good articles | A-class articles | Featured articles | Number of members |
7263 ![]() |
0 ![]() |
178 ![]() |
0 ![]() |
4 ![]() |
108 ![]() |
•
HOME •
TALK •
NEWSDESK •
UNSUBSCRIBE •
ARCHIVES • |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 10:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi Davey2010, I asked you back in 2020 about how to "go retro" by using the Arial font on Wikipedia that was there before 2014 or so. Now on talk pages and Wikipedia namespace pages the Georgia font is back. Is there any code I can add or whatever (anything I can do) to revert to Arial? Thanks from Nearly but not perfect ( talk) 18:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Sent by NPP Coordination using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
A very happy Christmas and New Year to you! |
![]() |
|
Have a great Christmas, and may 2024 bring you joy, happiness – and no trolls, vandals or visits from
Krampus!
|
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! |
Hello Davey2010, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
-- Ozzie10aaaa ( talk) 22:30, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy Holidays! |
Hi, Davey2010! Have a happy and safe season, and a blessed new year!! Holiday cheers, -- Discographer ( talk) 23:23, 20 December 2023 (UTC) |
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! |
Hello Davey2010, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
★Trekker (
talk) is wishing you
Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user
Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
★Trekker ( talk) 12:15, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! |
Hello Davey2010, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:48, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
BOZ (
talk) is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer. :) BOZ ( talk) 00:16, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Onel5969 TT me 02:55, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello Davey2010: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 04:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 04:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
★Trekker (
talk) is wishing you
Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's
Solstice or
Christmas,
Diwali,
Hogmanay,
Hanukkah,
Lenaia,
Festivus or even the
Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:WereSpielChequers/Dec15b}} to your friends' talk pages.
★Trekker ( talk) 10:02, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! |
Hello Davey2010, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
I wish that you may have a very Happy Holiday!
Whether you celebrate
Christmas,
Hanukkah,
Kwanzaa,
Hogmanay,
Festivus or your hemisphere's
Solstice, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! May the New Year provide you joy and fulfillment! Thanks for everything you do here.
Jerium (
talk)
17:47, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:Coffee/Holidays}} to your fellow editors' talk pages.
Have a happy and safe holidayz :)
Jerium (
talk)
17:47, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
|
|
The 12 Days of Wikipedia
|
Thanks so much Chris, I wish you and yours a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year, Many Thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk 17:53, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
I hope that you are able to find holiday cheer this year and are able to spend time with loved ones. Merry Christmas, Davey! Wishing you the best in 2024 as well.
TheSandDoctor
Talk
07:20, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello Davey2010: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, -- Dustfreeworld ( talk) 12:42, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
RV ( talk) 17:37, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Davey2010! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T)
19:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC)