![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
![]() |
I have the quirky DYK today, which is rare, and I don't quite know why music for peace was deemed quirky. - I took and picked the blue-and-yellow pic last year for May. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 14:06, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
We sang the song last Sunday, DYK? - today performances in Ukraine - for Ukraine - for peace, at the bottom an imaginary set of eight DYK - and more May pics-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 15:10, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
today more pics, and should this woman have an article? - or only her sons? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:23, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 09:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Helena Braun you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
The Most Comfortable Chair --
The Most Comfortable Chair (
talk)
04:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
The article
Fire and Sword you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Fire and Sword for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
ArcticSeeress --
ArcticSeeress (
talk)
15:01, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, i see you did a revert here. Your edit summary said that one user asked you to do it because there was an ongoing discussion.
In fact i started that discussione and the user who forwarded the request to you was the only one against it ( and the only one expressing himself until today) based on specious argument, first calling WP:COMMON and then backtracing it when results went against his personal preference. You can see it by yourself on the [ wikiproject talk page]. In those days no other user partecipated in the discussion, so following WP policy and objective result on the popularity name i proceeded to make the move.
Over and over wikipedia policy reminds their users to give valid arguments over changes/edits and that discussions are not votes. Also not to go against wikipedia policy and to follow WP:COMMON when choosing the title of an article.
I suggest you to reconsider your decision now that you have a more clear grasp of the situation, or to elaborate further your rationales behind it, if i didn't fairly represent it in this message. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Opencross ( talk • contribs) 17:05, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello @ DanCherek I hope you're doing good. I'm sruggling with adding the reception. Can you write the review from TOI. Thanks, for your consideration. C1K98V ( 💬 ✒️ 📂) 02:57, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, yes, that's definitely fine. Thanks for dealing with this. I judged that the request was uncontroversial because of the grammar and sources arguments, and the fact that there were no previous moves or RMs for the article. Do you think there's anything else I should have taken into account before making this move? Dr. Vogel ( talk) 15:03, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
i'd like to write an article about myself actually my Biography how can i go about it -- Tharemnant ( talk) 10:33, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Australia national cricket team record by opponent is changing by one idiot according to his will. I need help. He will Bangladesh dominate Australia in cricket records which is false. Idris Munaf Shaikh2 ( talk) 09:12, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
The In Amber article still doesn't appear in Google when typing a research with the words "In Amber album Hercules and Love Affair Wikipedia". Could you tell me which person(s) I could contact to make this article " patrolled". Thanks. Carliertwo ( talk) 16:49, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
19:01, 20 June 2022 DanCherek talk contribs m 3,748 bytes 0 DanCherek moved page Zionist Party to Ceire Cion without leaving a redirect: Requested by Mellohi! at WP:RM/TR : Per RM on talk page.
Hi Dan - The page ANYONE (band) is under attack by Issac Denwood who joined wikipedia a few hours ago and has contributed nothing but attacks to the ANYONE page. It seems the account was created specifically to attack the page. In addition to removing all but one of the pictures (claiming they are 'self promotional'?), he has removed entire sections of the article (all well cited with links) and has even nominated it for immediate deletion. The ANYONE page has been up for 23 years. Can you help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Togetherment ( talk • contribs) 15:25, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Diligent Librarian Barnstar | |
For exemplary service at the Resource Exchange, tirelessly delivering the reliable sources on which this encyclopedia depends, please accept this award. :) Thank you for your speedy fulfillment of Resource Exchange requests. Your help is greatly appreciated! Keep up the great work :) MrLinkinPark333 ( talk) 22:49, 22 June 2022 (UTC) |
Since you reviewed the last one before it went out, have you seen/can you take a look at the next draft. I'd like to sent it soon to get some wider notification of the backlog drive out before it starts. Thanks. MB 03:38, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello DanCherek,
At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000 [a] at the end of May.
Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size. [b]
In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).
While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).
A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by
buidhe and
Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up
here.
Barnstars will be awarded.
Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.
There is a new template available, {{
NPP backlog}}
, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:
Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 14863 articles, as of 14:00, 23 July 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot
There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.
{{subst:NPR invite}}on their talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello DanCherek:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long
Good Article Editathon event in July 2022!
Running from July 1 to 31, 2022, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event focused on the topic of women and the environment. Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works during the event period (with an emphasis on environmental links and topics). GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
Alanna the Brave ( talk) 12:56, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Hi Dan, and thank you for your work on this topic. Please correct the nationality of this composer: he was Indonesian and remained so throughout his lifetime. As a family member I am able to prove this definitively but am naturally reluctant to post private documents to this page. If you remain unconvinced, please get in touch with me. Not sure how this error crept in! Thanks in advance Andarisana ( talk) 13:39, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, it seems that you did a mistake by replacing the punctuation signs of the French apostrophe. Now I have to revert back to previous version because you modified some of the images files and changed their titles by modifying such orthogrpahical signs. Don't repeat the same mistake please, thank you anyways for trying to contribute. دانيالوه ( talk) 18:19, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello. I hope this message meets you well. If you aren't too busy, review this page Neo (BBNaija). Thanks. Amaekuma ( talk) 12:52, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
The article
Helena Braun you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Helena Braun for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
The Most Comfortable Chair --
The Most Comfortable Chair (
talk)
16:01, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
How to add photos -- Isaac Trappkid ( talk) 21:27, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
you're my mentor now or something
TheGoodDude22 (
talk)
21:30, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Henri Coutard you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Amitchell125 --
Amitchell125 (
talk)
08:01, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, DanCherek. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.
Please take a moment to review
Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially
the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow
post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect
is used. This can be done using
Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to
secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status
can be revoked.
Useful links:
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Primefac ( talk) 10:55, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() |
Ukrainian peace music is "on" today, with the conductor! - Pentecost (on last Sunday and Monday in Germany) brought a rich harvest of great music in two church services (one with me singing in choir) and two concerts with my brother in the orchestra, - four pictures I took besides the symphonic one. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 14:15, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello Mr Cherek. Yesterday you were kind enough to give me some guidance on attribution. Thank you! I was unaware of this need.
I have also used information from other wikis, specifically kiswahili wikipedia, and was wondering how to attribute it properly? In the few times I have done this I added a translation tag on the talk page with the wiki and page link to it. I have never added any attributions into my edit summary as you guided me yesterday.
Is there a more proper way to do this? Any templates like you gave me for the english wiki attributions?
Thank you for any advice, BevoLJ ( talk) 08:26, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Translating from [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.
If you want to go back and fix some unattributed translations, just make a small edit to the page with an edit summary like this:Content was translated from [[:fr:Exact name of French article]] on 21 June 2022; see its history for attribution.
so that it's clear when the translation occurred (replace the example date with the actual one). Let me know if you have any questions about that.
DanCherek (
talk)
11:12, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
I saw that you put a copyvio-revdel tag on 12Stone due to this edit, but I did want to point out that the IP only re-added the content, the offending copyvio has been part of the article since it's creation, and I only noticed and removed it on June 22. I don't know if or how it should be addressed since I know little about copyvio history deletion, but I thought I would point that the copyvio problem goes throughout the entire history of the article. - Aoidh ( talk) 19:43, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello , I apologize it’s part of my university assignment to weekly contribute in Wikipedia . You can block me but just wait for the professor to grade the contributions please — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hajar2022 ( talk • contribs) 13:33, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Please remove your report @dancherek just until my professor grades my contributions and I apologize for the unintentional copy rights violations Hajar2022 ( talk) 13:35, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
The article
Helena Braun you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Helena Braun for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
The Most Comfortable Chair --
The Most Comfortable Chair (
talk)
20:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
( t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
The article
Henri Coutard you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Henri Coutard for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Amitchell125 --
Amitchell125 (
talk)
15:01, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi DanCherek, I felt the need to delete wholesale your most recent edit on the Ajahn Brahm page. Apologies if in doing so, I also removed content that may have genuinely improved the article. The truth is, as I scrolled through the changes you had made, there was altogether too much material I felt had no place in the article, and it would have taken too much work on my part to selectively remove individual changes you had made. There is no need to add the type of excessive linking that you made to the article, as per WP:OVERLINK. In addition, some of the content you wrote, for example, regarding Brahm's education, does not bear much relevance to the article topic, especially as it relates more to the school itself, so that doesn't need to be there. If you feel that I have unfairly undone your work, please discuss it with me on the article talk page before reverting. Thank you. Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 04:38, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
The article
Henri Coutard you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Henri Coutard for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Amitchell125 --
Amitchell125 (
talk)
21:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Didn't see it copyrighted, did you? 49.184.21.68 ( talk) 19:22, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
All creative works are copyrighted, by international agreement, unless either they fall into the public domain or their copyright is explicitly disclaimed.It doesn't need a copyright notice to be protected by copyright, so please stop copying text from other websites to Wikipedia (you have done this on several articles now). DanCherek ( talk) 19:24, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi DanCherek,
You recently reverted several changes I made to the page titled "Fourth, fifth, and sixth derivatives of position." The reason for making these changes was the following statement that appears on said page:
"Unlike the first three derivatives, the higher-order derivatives rarely appear, and have little practical use..."
which is not only untrue, it is also disparaging toward a topic of active research in the dynamics community. The uses of higher-order derivatives are being investigated, and it appears that they *do* have practical uses. I was trying to address this untrue claim with illustrative examples from the literature. While I was at it, I also edited several related pages. I see those changes have been reverted as well.
If the Wiki community does not like my changes, that is one thing, but I assume that you value accuracy. How can I/we flag the above statement? 172.249.153.200 ( talk) 15:54, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Look, I am happy to remove the copyright violation, even if they aren't any, if you give me a few minutes. Just to let you know: factual statements are NOT COPYRIGHT protected, hence they can be copied without violating any copyright. In addition, if you BELIEVE there is a violation, please be specific, because there may be a half sentence or two that would may be "creative" and thus protected, but that can usually be fixed by changing a word or two, which is exactly what I willing to. Just reverting a whole page wholesale is just ridiculous. Peteruetz ( talk) 21:15, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Apologies, but I reverted your removal of the copyrighted material in favour of just tagging the draft for wholesale deletion under WP:G12. The only actual content on the page after your removal was the sentence stating where he was born, and that is it; the remainder is a malformatted sources list. Lider has been told how to properly cite sources via -en-help, but he refuses to do so in favour of plagiarising the PDF. — Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:25, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Could you pliz tall me how to used is -- Sajid khan mashsood ( talk) 19:45, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello: I was flagged several times for a copyright violation for adding information to the biography of New Jersey Supreme Court Chief Justice Joseph Weintraub Joseph Weintraub - Wikipedia
The information came from a website maintained by the New Jersey Courts. I work for the New Jersey Courts and have been asked to maintain the Wikipedia pages of our former chief justices, so I used the information from our website and pasted it to Wikipedia.
Please advise
Thank you. Mike Mathis (Redacted) CCRSocialMedia.Mbx ( talk) 16:50, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I want to add a business website to Wikipedia. How can I do that? -- Itsbloggerumair ( talk) 07:49, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Att DanCherek: You seem to be worried that content is copyrighted by greencarcongress.com. That is impossible. I never saw that webpage until I saw your post so it is not my source. My source is the reference that I put in this paragraph which is a GM press release itself. You might try comparing these 2 sources. You'll notice that greencarcongress.com copied the info from the GM press release. So, there is no copyright issue here whatsoever which is why I put back what you deleted. You might try not jumping to conclusions so quickly without doing your due diligence first. 108.6.237.202 ( talk) 21:01, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
i want to add this text because i am the one who said coined the term in 2010. i was interviewed about it and thought it had been said at a talk i attended. video review shows it was not so i thought of it at a talk i attended. i would like this text to be added as it is correct. i do not want to war here. it's my first time editing something on wiki and i don't know how to do it. i engaged with "josh" and he oked the edit and now i'm trying to engage with dancherek. thanks for your review and assistance!
(Redacted)
See page 8. This citation applies here as well https://via.library.depaul.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1151&context=etd Dalwan ( talk) 23:22, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello, good evening, sorry to bother you with this subject, but I could notice that both these articles are not complying with some rules, I ask you to read the message I left on the discussion page of a user in the wikipedia in Portuguese ok, because I called him because he who deleted these two articles in the wikipedia in Portuguese several times. ( READ HERE ) for you will understand what I am talking about. Soberano Sauron ( talk) 00:02, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello Dan, I want to add some images to a friend's Wikipedia page. Can you tell me if this is possible? Thank you, Harold -- HRWIII ( talk) 00:08, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
I really appreciate your attempted WP:RIA advice added to the edit history of Demographics of Ghana in this edit. It's nice to know I'm not the only one paying attention to such things (see here, for example). Otoh, I was a bit confused by your edit summary, which provided an attribution statement for content copied from Demographics of Pakistan; how could this added content containing several decades of Ghanaian vital statistics have come from an article about Pakistan? Am I missing something? (As a sidebar, you may have received a reversion notification about a subsequent edit of mine; this edit was directed at the addition of numeric data to the table which was unsourced, and had nothing to do with your edit, which was collateral damage; but since the whole point was the RIA in the summary history, I didn't think the undo of the dummy edit itself actually mattered one way or the other; nevertheless, my apologies for the undo notif, which has nothing to do with your edit.) Thanks again for worrying about copyright and copy attribution, and carry on! Mathglot ( talk) 00:45, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
In July 2022, the United Nations published its 2022 World Population Prospects, a biennially-updated database where key demographic indicators are estimated and projected worldwide down to the country level. They prepared the following estimates of demographic indicators in Ghana for every year from 1950 to 2021, as well as projections for future decades.which were definitely derived from the Pakistan article. Not the biggest deal, but enough to get flagged at CopyPatrol (which is where I noticed and dealt with it). Hope that makes sense! DanCherek ( talk) 01:23, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi DanCherek,
The drafted submission for Draft:Toby Ng (designer) has been revised after your declination with fuller references providing evidence of notability. Would you consider reviewing it again? Please and thank you in advance.
Noto4856 ( talk) 09:18, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Award by gusundol |
Thanks to your advice 구순돌 ( talk) 13:55, 15 July 2022 (UTC) |
How would I Write an article about my business? Sping World ( talk) 16:53, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Good day to you Sir.
Please assist me in creating a Wikipedia page.
Appreciatively, Xavier Serif -- Xavier Serif ( talk) 13:28, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Rommel Villa is an Oscar winner in the short film category… he is a rising Movie and television producer, director and screen writer… why should he not be added to list of prominent Bolivian Americans? -- Xavier Serif ( talk) 14:15, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
she already has a German wikipedia page. Why is her name in red on the English wikipedia page? Xavier Serif ( talk) 14:20, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi Dan, I was wondering if you might be able to tell me why you took down a lot of the content I added to the Wildlife Conservation Network article? There’s been a lot of changes at WCN in the past few years and I was trying to update it with more relevant information. 2600:1700:AF20:C970:E5B4:E35E:93EB:AD50 ( talk) 02:15, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi Dan, I’m not so sure that I would say it’s plagiarized in any lengthy way. A lot of that info is info that’s just summarized from the website. 2600:1700:AF20:C970:8D46:106C:70E7:97D3 ( talk) 00:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Logan Sapphire you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
PCN02WPS --
PCN02WPS (
talk)
15:40, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
I've added "{{ connected contributor}}" to the article as I'm the website administrator for the Houston Tidelanders. One reason I created this Wikipedia page is that I want to see the history of the Tidelanders preserved in more than one location. There are pieces of information on the Wikipedia page that aren't on the website and I did my best to condense, paraphrase, or present information differently. We own the copyright to the history listed on the website. I expect the differences to grow when our official historian has time to edit and add to the page. I can assure you that the information contained is historically accurate as far as I know as condensed from of our original historical documents. W.H. Anderson's observations is a direct quote from what I understand (I changed it to a quote".
The history of the BHS (aka SPEBSQSA) that I listed is a conglomeration of facts from multiple sources (the Tidelanders, the BHS, and another website that I found a tidbit of history from) but it's very condensed. From what I understand it's historically accurate but not nearly as detailed as as the history noted on the BHS website. Steve sings bass ( talk) 01:22, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
The article
Logan Sapphire you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Logan Sapphire for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
PCN02WPS --
PCN02WPS (
talk)
16:40, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
The article
Logan Sapphire you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Logan Sapphire for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
PCN02WPS --
PCN02WPS (
talk)
00:42, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
I am disappointed at what I consider the rather aggressive way you have handled this. The website I used as a source was evidently set up originally in part to encourage tourism and the contribution it could make to the local economy, and I carried out extensive edits to remove the florid elements and change the tone to a much simpler and more encyclopedic style. It seems to me that the result was not in violation of copyright rules, but this is naturally a matter of opinion.
I do not, of course, dispute the right of reviewers to police copyright rules, but I would like to see a more consensual approach. I can see that where there are flagrant issues such as potentially libellous statements about living persons then immediate action is needed, but in a case like this I think it would be more appropriate, rather than immediately to mutilate the work that contributors have done, to raise your issues with them and listen to their point of view. There are further background issues in this case, such as the fact that the original webpage was archived, and that its authorship was clearly by a voluntary community organisation concerned to encourage tourism, an objective which would only be advanced by the inclusion of further details on Wikipedia. I might mention that I have no personal connection or interest with the community involved; I simply stumbled across the article by accident and felt that the original authors had missed an obvious trick.
However, now that you have destroyed the work I did I am not going to waste time trying to make additional drafting changes to meet your objections. The community involved will have to make do without this little advertisement. Deipnosophista ( talk) 11:04, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
We Are Water Protectors you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
BennyOnTheLoose --
BennyOnTheLoose (
talk)
08:41, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
today: violin solo, yes, the Melody and you can listen Gerda Arendt ( talk) 14:12, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article
We Are Water Protectors you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:We Are Water Protectors for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
BennyOnTheLoose --
BennyOnTheLoose (
talk)
13:22, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I Joined wikipiedia because I want to make a page for a charity group I am involved with. I actually have no idea about the process on making a page. -- Bhandarikushal ( talk) 13:04, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi DanCherek! I've seen how helpful you been in the past with copyright issues so I thought I would ask to see if you could help me how to address possible copyright issues on article Seán Scanlan, as copyright issues on Wikipedia are not my forte. I was patrolling recent changes and I noticed that there was a large amount of information removed in the edit here: [1]. When I was looking for sources to see if I could re-add any information with a refence, I noticed the article was very similar to this source [2], which Earwig's tool seems to confirm: [3]. I proceeded to rewrite some of the article and wanted to see if you could take a look at it and make sure my rewrite meets guidelines and then also advice on how address this possible copyright issue. Thanks for any help and advice! Wikipedialuva ( talk) 03:12, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
why did you change my sex worker edit did ı do wrong? Volkan1881 ( talk) 14:54, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Dan Cherek Exactly, I want to learn the correct way to upload audio files and images and the correct way to work within the wiki community. -- Nourah.Alkhaldi79 ( talk) 22:23, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
This award is given to DanCherek for 30 reviews in the July NPP backlog reduction drive. Your contributions played a part in the 9895 reviews that took place during the drive. Thank you for your contributions. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 09:08, 3 August 2022 (UTC) |
I want my page to be called ANDSOFORTH how do I change that? -- Emstuandsoforth ( talk) 10:39, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Women in Green GA Editathon — July '22 | |
Thank you for your excellent contributions to We Are Water Protectors at the WiG "Women and the Environment" editathon event! All the best, Alanna the Brave ( talk) 15:44, 4 August 2022 (UTC) |
Hi Dan! A couple days ago, I started working on CopyPatrol after becoming aware of it through your RfA (which I am glad to see is going swimmingly), and I wanted to ask for your feedback on this case which I handled. I removed the copyright-violating text and instructed the editor that material must be presented in one's own words; the copyvio has since been revdel'd by an admin. The editor presented a re-phrased version of the material in question: the abstract of the journal which is the subject of the article. While I personally was satisfied with the re-wording, part of me is wondering if it still falls afoul of close paraphrasing due to the structural similarity between the article section as it currently stands, and the abstract. Do you think anything more needs to be done? Dylan620 (he/him · talk · edits) 14:13, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello DanCherek,
After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.
Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.
{{subst:NPR invite}}on their talk page.
Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
I added the "Performance" paragraph to the "Saturn-Shuttle" page after seeing this in the same description on nasa.fandom.com. I simply wanted to update the wikipedia entry. Bigmanhelperhouseman ( talk) 22:16, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Hey - I'm jumping the gun a bit here, but I don't think I'm going to jinx anything. Congratulations on what has been the least controversial RfA I can remember witnessing. Enjoy the new buttons :) Girth Summit (blether) 08:03, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
:P
firefly (
t ·
c )
10:46, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I am finishing up with a draft I am creating and I would like to change the name of the draft. Is that something that I can do? -- CheyenneDeBolt ( talk) 16:10, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, could you help me understand why my sources on the Shelem page don't meet reliability requirements? Most are news articles or links to his music repertoire. He is the subject of all the articles used. Would you mind looking over page for Shelem and help me understand how to improve? -- CheyenneDeBolt ( talk) 17:41, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations!
It is my great pleasure to inform you that
your Request for Adminship has
closed successfully and you are
now an administrator!
|
I was the first one to comment on your RfA, and I thought it would be nice to be the last supporter. But I was 20 minutes late. Anyways, welcome to the admin-corps.
If you have any questions or doubts, please feel to ask me, or any admins. Most of the admins are very co-operative, and helpful, not all of them though. The only thing currently confuses me is hist-merge. See you around :-) —usernamekiran (talk) 19:02, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations on your successful RFA! Carrying on a tradition, allow me to impart the words of wisdom I received from Katie after my RFA passed almost seven long, exhausting, and questionable years ago: |
|
DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales, because if it did, it would be much, much better. All rights released under GFDL. |
This is the second time this year I saw someone with a RfA of 0 opposes. (The previous one was Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Firefly.) Good job (but it's not a big deal)! weeklyd3 ( block | talk | contributions) 17:24, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
.sysop-show
are only shown to sysops and people who explicitly show them like me)
weeklyd3 (
block |
talk |
contributions)
17:57, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello @ DanCherek, Good day Congrats you're an admin now. I'm glad you assist me previously twice. I want to take up new role and replace you. Would you mind guiding me with the copy patrol tool. I have slight low experience with copyright violation and revdel. Thanks C1K98V ( 💬 ✒️ 📂) 04:51, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Dear Dan Cherek, I am creating a bio page and I saw that you deleted it. Why? The bot said that it was deleted because it references Amazon when that company is not included in the article. Bottom line how much do I have to pay for this free service? Thank you. Kyle Kyle Langdon-Weyrich ( talk) 17:42, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Congrats! -- Victor Trevor ( talk) 18:45, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations! — Diannaa ( talk) 18:54, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() | Congratulations DanCherek! Your RfA was successful. You are now an administrator on the English Wikipedia. I hope you have just as happy a time editing in the future as you did before your RfA. You may want to look at the admin guide to read up on any tools you are unfamiliar with. |
Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 18:59, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Congrats from me as well! – Kavyansh.Singh ( talk) 06:39, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Source is https://www.highschoolofdundee.org.uk/uploads/tinymce/Neil%20Douglas%20Tribute.pdf, not the Scotsman. Perhaps you could clean it up if problematic, rather than just deleting it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7E:4CCF:8E00:D9F8:1D89:26DD:5ADA ( talk) 22:59, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
A baton for you! |
Congratulations on a successful RfA. Between you,
Firefly, and myself, now all three records tracked at
RFX200 and
RFX300—highest unopposed, unanimous, and raw support—are held by 2022 RfAs, which is quite something given that there have only been 5 successful RfAs this year!
Stats geekery aside, I know you'll be an amazing admin. I'm sure you'll have access to counsel from admins much more experienced than me, but do know that I'm around. As you take my place as the juniormost admin, I thought I'd recognize that in some way by passing this baton on to you. Maybe when the next successful RfA occurs (which may be sometime soon, but
Mazel tov, new administrator. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 19:41, 9 August 2022 (UTC) |
I am not getting why you deleted it. The AfD was more than 1 year ago and most of the participants who voted for "Delete" wrongly predicted that the subject won't get any coverage after the controversy that was going on at the time. All of this has been proven wrong and the subject is still getting coverage. [5] [6] It is not even uncommon to re-create the article once the subject has gained more notability. A similar example would be this article which was created less than 2 months after the AfD [7] because the subject was more notable now.
It will absolutely end up being kept if an AfD is ever initiated. You should restore the article and its talk page. -- Yoonadue ( talk) 04:18, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'd like some help with referencing. I am using some of my sources in multiple parts of my article. How do I use the same source in various locations without creating a new "reference" in the list? ie if I want to use reference [1] first then use it after references [2,3,4] but don't want it to show as [5]. -- CheyenneDeBolt ( talk) 16:31, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Hey DanCherek. First off, congratulations on your successful RFA.
You declined my histmerge request on Cascade de Soulou with the reasoning of "a histmerge is not needed here as the content in both pages was added by the same editor, so there are no attribution issues that need to be repaired". The creation of the main article is currently attributed to me when it should be attributed to the other editor. I'm only listed as the creator because I draftified the original article, which left behind a redirect with a G2 CSD tag, and they pasted the content before the CSD could be reviewed. I'm new to requesting histmerge, so I won't be at all surprised if I'm wrong, but isn't this part of the reason that histmerges are done? Hey man im josh ( talk) 22:40, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
For over 100 article reviews during 2021. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 08:20, 16 August 2022 (UTC) |
Congrats on one of the most successful RfA ever! And thanks for mopping up three of my User drafts so quickly. Best wishes, Mr Serjeant Buzfuz ( talk) 14:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, i was wondering why my edit was removed? it included other sourced information apart from the encyclopedia one.
NameIsShaheer (
talk)
20:39, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
another ones are the famous love story of Sassi and Punnu whose love became a tale for many to remember. [1]The rest was copied from [8]. DanCherek ( talk) 20:44, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
References
I made this article by mistake here thinking it didn't exist, wondering if you could delete it.
My article:
Manuel Flaco Ibáñez
Original article (I though did not exist: Manuel "Flaco" Ibáñez Casint ( talk) 02:30, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
![]() |
I have the quirky DYK today, which is rare, and I don't quite know why music for peace was deemed quirky. - I took and picked the blue-and-yellow pic last year for May. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 14:06, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
We sang the song last Sunday, DYK? - today performances in Ukraine - for Ukraine - for peace, at the bottom an imaginary set of eight DYK - and more May pics-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 15:10, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
today more pics, and should this woman have an article? - or only her sons? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:23, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 09:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Helena Braun you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
The Most Comfortable Chair --
The Most Comfortable Chair (
talk)
04:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
The article
Fire and Sword you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Fire and Sword for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
ArcticSeeress --
ArcticSeeress (
talk)
15:01, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, i see you did a revert here. Your edit summary said that one user asked you to do it because there was an ongoing discussion.
In fact i started that discussione and the user who forwarded the request to you was the only one against it ( and the only one expressing himself until today) based on specious argument, first calling WP:COMMON and then backtracing it when results went against his personal preference. You can see it by yourself on the [ wikiproject talk page]. In those days no other user partecipated in the discussion, so following WP policy and objective result on the popularity name i proceeded to make the move.
Over and over wikipedia policy reminds their users to give valid arguments over changes/edits and that discussions are not votes. Also not to go against wikipedia policy and to follow WP:COMMON when choosing the title of an article.
I suggest you to reconsider your decision now that you have a more clear grasp of the situation, or to elaborate further your rationales behind it, if i didn't fairly represent it in this message. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Opencross ( talk • contribs) 17:05, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello @ DanCherek I hope you're doing good. I'm sruggling with adding the reception. Can you write the review from TOI. Thanks, for your consideration. C1K98V ( 💬 ✒️ 📂) 02:57, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, yes, that's definitely fine. Thanks for dealing with this. I judged that the request was uncontroversial because of the grammar and sources arguments, and the fact that there were no previous moves or RMs for the article. Do you think there's anything else I should have taken into account before making this move? Dr. Vogel ( talk) 15:03, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
i'd like to write an article about myself actually my Biography how can i go about it -- Tharemnant ( talk) 10:33, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Australia national cricket team record by opponent is changing by one idiot according to his will. I need help. He will Bangladesh dominate Australia in cricket records which is false. Idris Munaf Shaikh2 ( talk) 09:12, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
The In Amber article still doesn't appear in Google when typing a research with the words "In Amber album Hercules and Love Affair Wikipedia". Could you tell me which person(s) I could contact to make this article " patrolled". Thanks. Carliertwo ( talk) 16:49, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
19:01, 20 June 2022 DanCherek talk contribs m 3,748 bytes 0 DanCherek moved page Zionist Party to Ceire Cion without leaving a redirect: Requested by Mellohi! at WP:RM/TR : Per RM on talk page.
Hi Dan - The page ANYONE (band) is under attack by Issac Denwood who joined wikipedia a few hours ago and has contributed nothing but attacks to the ANYONE page. It seems the account was created specifically to attack the page. In addition to removing all but one of the pictures (claiming they are 'self promotional'?), he has removed entire sections of the article (all well cited with links) and has even nominated it for immediate deletion. The ANYONE page has been up for 23 years. Can you help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Togetherment ( talk • contribs) 15:25, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Diligent Librarian Barnstar | |
For exemplary service at the Resource Exchange, tirelessly delivering the reliable sources on which this encyclopedia depends, please accept this award. :) Thank you for your speedy fulfillment of Resource Exchange requests. Your help is greatly appreciated! Keep up the great work :) MrLinkinPark333 ( talk) 22:49, 22 June 2022 (UTC) |
Since you reviewed the last one before it went out, have you seen/can you take a look at the next draft. I'd like to sent it soon to get some wider notification of the backlog drive out before it starts. Thanks. MB 03:38, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello DanCherek,
At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000 [a] at the end of May.
Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size. [b]
In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).
While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).
A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by
buidhe and
Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up
here.
Barnstars will be awarded.
Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.
There is a new template available, {{
NPP backlog}}
, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:
Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 14863 articles, as of 14:00, 23 July 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot
There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.
{{subst:NPR invite}}on their talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello DanCherek:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long
Good Article Editathon event in July 2022!
Running from July 1 to 31, 2022, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event focused on the topic of women and the environment. Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works during the event period (with an emphasis on environmental links and topics). GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
Alanna the Brave ( talk) 12:56, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Hi Dan, and thank you for your work on this topic. Please correct the nationality of this composer: he was Indonesian and remained so throughout his lifetime. As a family member I am able to prove this definitively but am naturally reluctant to post private documents to this page. If you remain unconvinced, please get in touch with me. Not sure how this error crept in! Thanks in advance Andarisana ( talk) 13:39, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, it seems that you did a mistake by replacing the punctuation signs of the French apostrophe. Now I have to revert back to previous version because you modified some of the images files and changed their titles by modifying such orthogrpahical signs. Don't repeat the same mistake please, thank you anyways for trying to contribute. دانيالوه ( talk) 18:19, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello. I hope this message meets you well. If you aren't too busy, review this page Neo (BBNaija). Thanks. Amaekuma ( talk) 12:52, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
The article
Helena Braun you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Helena Braun for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
The Most Comfortable Chair --
The Most Comfortable Chair (
talk)
16:01, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
How to add photos -- Isaac Trappkid ( talk) 21:27, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
you're my mentor now or something
TheGoodDude22 (
talk)
21:30, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Henri Coutard you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Amitchell125 --
Amitchell125 (
talk)
08:01, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, DanCherek. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.
Please take a moment to review
Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially
the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow
post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect
is used. This can be done using
Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to
secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status
can be revoked.
Useful links:
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Primefac ( talk) 10:55, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() |
Ukrainian peace music is "on" today, with the conductor! - Pentecost (on last Sunday and Monday in Germany) brought a rich harvest of great music in two church services (one with me singing in choir) and two concerts with my brother in the orchestra, - four pictures I took besides the symphonic one. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 14:15, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello Mr Cherek. Yesterday you were kind enough to give me some guidance on attribution. Thank you! I was unaware of this need.
I have also used information from other wikis, specifically kiswahili wikipedia, and was wondering how to attribute it properly? In the few times I have done this I added a translation tag on the talk page with the wiki and page link to it. I have never added any attributions into my edit summary as you guided me yesterday.
Is there a more proper way to do this? Any templates like you gave me for the english wiki attributions?
Thank you for any advice, BevoLJ ( talk) 08:26, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Translating from [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.
If you want to go back and fix some unattributed translations, just make a small edit to the page with an edit summary like this:Content was translated from [[:fr:Exact name of French article]] on 21 June 2022; see its history for attribution.
so that it's clear when the translation occurred (replace the example date with the actual one). Let me know if you have any questions about that.
DanCherek (
talk)
11:12, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
I saw that you put a copyvio-revdel tag on 12Stone due to this edit, but I did want to point out that the IP only re-added the content, the offending copyvio has been part of the article since it's creation, and I only noticed and removed it on June 22. I don't know if or how it should be addressed since I know little about copyvio history deletion, but I thought I would point that the copyvio problem goes throughout the entire history of the article. - Aoidh ( talk) 19:43, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello , I apologize it’s part of my university assignment to weekly contribute in Wikipedia . You can block me but just wait for the professor to grade the contributions please — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hajar2022 ( talk • contribs) 13:33, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Please remove your report @dancherek just until my professor grades my contributions and I apologize for the unintentional copy rights violations Hajar2022 ( talk) 13:35, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
The article
Helena Braun you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Helena Braun for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
The Most Comfortable Chair --
The Most Comfortable Chair (
talk)
20:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
( t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
The article
Henri Coutard you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Henri Coutard for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Amitchell125 --
Amitchell125 (
talk)
15:01, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi DanCherek, I felt the need to delete wholesale your most recent edit on the Ajahn Brahm page. Apologies if in doing so, I also removed content that may have genuinely improved the article. The truth is, as I scrolled through the changes you had made, there was altogether too much material I felt had no place in the article, and it would have taken too much work on my part to selectively remove individual changes you had made. There is no need to add the type of excessive linking that you made to the article, as per WP:OVERLINK. In addition, some of the content you wrote, for example, regarding Brahm's education, does not bear much relevance to the article topic, especially as it relates more to the school itself, so that doesn't need to be there. If you feel that I have unfairly undone your work, please discuss it with me on the article talk page before reverting. Thank you. Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 04:38, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
The article
Henri Coutard you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Henri Coutard for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Amitchell125 --
Amitchell125 (
talk)
21:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Didn't see it copyrighted, did you? 49.184.21.68 ( talk) 19:22, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
All creative works are copyrighted, by international agreement, unless either they fall into the public domain or their copyright is explicitly disclaimed.It doesn't need a copyright notice to be protected by copyright, so please stop copying text from other websites to Wikipedia (you have done this on several articles now). DanCherek ( talk) 19:24, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi DanCherek,
You recently reverted several changes I made to the page titled "Fourth, fifth, and sixth derivatives of position." The reason for making these changes was the following statement that appears on said page:
"Unlike the first three derivatives, the higher-order derivatives rarely appear, and have little practical use..."
which is not only untrue, it is also disparaging toward a topic of active research in the dynamics community. The uses of higher-order derivatives are being investigated, and it appears that they *do* have practical uses. I was trying to address this untrue claim with illustrative examples from the literature. While I was at it, I also edited several related pages. I see those changes have been reverted as well.
If the Wiki community does not like my changes, that is one thing, but I assume that you value accuracy. How can I/we flag the above statement? 172.249.153.200 ( talk) 15:54, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Look, I am happy to remove the copyright violation, even if they aren't any, if you give me a few minutes. Just to let you know: factual statements are NOT COPYRIGHT protected, hence they can be copied without violating any copyright. In addition, if you BELIEVE there is a violation, please be specific, because there may be a half sentence or two that would may be "creative" and thus protected, but that can usually be fixed by changing a word or two, which is exactly what I willing to. Just reverting a whole page wholesale is just ridiculous. Peteruetz ( talk) 21:15, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Apologies, but I reverted your removal of the copyrighted material in favour of just tagging the draft for wholesale deletion under WP:G12. The only actual content on the page after your removal was the sentence stating where he was born, and that is it; the remainder is a malformatted sources list. Lider has been told how to properly cite sources via -en-help, but he refuses to do so in favour of plagiarising the PDF. — Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:25, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Could you pliz tall me how to used is -- Sajid khan mashsood ( talk) 19:45, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello: I was flagged several times for a copyright violation for adding information to the biography of New Jersey Supreme Court Chief Justice Joseph Weintraub Joseph Weintraub - Wikipedia
The information came from a website maintained by the New Jersey Courts. I work for the New Jersey Courts and have been asked to maintain the Wikipedia pages of our former chief justices, so I used the information from our website and pasted it to Wikipedia.
Please advise
Thank you. Mike Mathis (Redacted) CCRSocialMedia.Mbx ( talk) 16:50, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I want to add a business website to Wikipedia. How can I do that? -- Itsbloggerumair ( talk) 07:49, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Att DanCherek: You seem to be worried that content is copyrighted by greencarcongress.com. That is impossible. I never saw that webpage until I saw your post so it is not my source. My source is the reference that I put in this paragraph which is a GM press release itself. You might try comparing these 2 sources. You'll notice that greencarcongress.com copied the info from the GM press release. So, there is no copyright issue here whatsoever which is why I put back what you deleted. You might try not jumping to conclusions so quickly without doing your due diligence first. 108.6.237.202 ( talk) 21:01, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
i want to add this text because i am the one who said coined the term in 2010. i was interviewed about it and thought it had been said at a talk i attended. video review shows it was not so i thought of it at a talk i attended. i would like this text to be added as it is correct. i do not want to war here. it's my first time editing something on wiki and i don't know how to do it. i engaged with "josh" and he oked the edit and now i'm trying to engage with dancherek. thanks for your review and assistance!
(Redacted)
See page 8. This citation applies here as well https://via.library.depaul.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1151&context=etd Dalwan ( talk) 23:22, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello, good evening, sorry to bother you with this subject, but I could notice that both these articles are not complying with some rules, I ask you to read the message I left on the discussion page of a user in the wikipedia in Portuguese ok, because I called him because he who deleted these two articles in the wikipedia in Portuguese several times. ( READ HERE ) for you will understand what I am talking about. Soberano Sauron ( talk) 00:02, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello Dan, I want to add some images to a friend's Wikipedia page. Can you tell me if this is possible? Thank you, Harold -- HRWIII ( talk) 00:08, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
I really appreciate your attempted WP:RIA advice added to the edit history of Demographics of Ghana in this edit. It's nice to know I'm not the only one paying attention to such things (see here, for example). Otoh, I was a bit confused by your edit summary, which provided an attribution statement for content copied from Demographics of Pakistan; how could this added content containing several decades of Ghanaian vital statistics have come from an article about Pakistan? Am I missing something? (As a sidebar, you may have received a reversion notification about a subsequent edit of mine; this edit was directed at the addition of numeric data to the table which was unsourced, and had nothing to do with your edit, which was collateral damage; but since the whole point was the RIA in the summary history, I didn't think the undo of the dummy edit itself actually mattered one way or the other; nevertheless, my apologies for the undo notif, which has nothing to do with your edit.) Thanks again for worrying about copyright and copy attribution, and carry on! Mathglot ( talk) 00:45, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
In July 2022, the United Nations published its 2022 World Population Prospects, a biennially-updated database where key demographic indicators are estimated and projected worldwide down to the country level. They prepared the following estimates of demographic indicators in Ghana for every year from 1950 to 2021, as well as projections for future decades.which were definitely derived from the Pakistan article. Not the biggest deal, but enough to get flagged at CopyPatrol (which is where I noticed and dealt with it). Hope that makes sense! DanCherek ( talk) 01:23, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi DanCherek,
The drafted submission for Draft:Toby Ng (designer) has been revised after your declination with fuller references providing evidence of notability. Would you consider reviewing it again? Please and thank you in advance.
Noto4856 ( talk) 09:18, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Award by gusundol |
Thanks to your advice 구순돌 ( talk) 13:55, 15 July 2022 (UTC) |
How would I Write an article about my business? Sping World ( talk) 16:53, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Good day to you Sir.
Please assist me in creating a Wikipedia page.
Appreciatively, Xavier Serif -- Xavier Serif ( talk) 13:28, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Rommel Villa is an Oscar winner in the short film category… he is a rising Movie and television producer, director and screen writer… why should he not be added to list of prominent Bolivian Americans? -- Xavier Serif ( talk) 14:15, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
she already has a German wikipedia page. Why is her name in red on the English wikipedia page? Xavier Serif ( talk) 14:20, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi Dan, I was wondering if you might be able to tell me why you took down a lot of the content I added to the Wildlife Conservation Network article? There’s been a lot of changes at WCN in the past few years and I was trying to update it with more relevant information. 2600:1700:AF20:C970:E5B4:E35E:93EB:AD50 ( talk) 02:15, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi Dan, I’m not so sure that I would say it’s plagiarized in any lengthy way. A lot of that info is info that’s just summarized from the website. 2600:1700:AF20:C970:8D46:106C:70E7:97D3 ( talk) 00:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Logan Sapphire you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
PCN02WPS --
PCN02WPS (
talk)
15:40, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
I've added "{{ connected contributor}}" to the article as I'm the website administrator for the Houston Tidelanders. One reason I created this Wikipedia page is that I want to see the history of the Tidelanders preserved in more than one location. There are pieces of information on the Wikipedia page that aren't on the website and I did my best to condense, paraphrase, or present information differently. We own the copyright to the history listed on the website. I expect the differences to grow when our official historian has time to edit and add to the page. I can assure you that the information contained is historically accurate as far as I know as condensed from of our original historical documents. W.H. Anderson's observations is a direct quote from what I understand (I changed it to a quote".
The history of the BHS (aka SPEBSQSA) that I listed is a conglomeration of facts from multiple sources (the Tidelanders, the BHS, and another website that I found a tidbit of history from) but it's very condensed. From what I understand it's historically accurate but not nearly as detailed as as the history noted on the BHS website. Steve sings bass ( talk) 01:22, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
The article
Logan Sapphire you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Logan Sapphire for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
PCN02WPS --
PCN02WPS (
talk)
16:40, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
The article
Logan Sapphire you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Logan Sapphire for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
PCN02WPS --
PCN02WPS (
talk)
00:42, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
I am disappointed at what I consider the rather aggressive way you have handled this. The website I used as a source was evidently set up originally in part to encourage tourism and the contribution it could make to the local economy, and I carried out extensive edits to remove the florid elements and change the tone to a much simpler and more encyclopedic style. It seems to me that the result was not in violation of copyright rules, but this is naturally a matter of opinion.
I do not, of course, dispute the right of reviewers to police copyright rules, but I would like to see a more consensual approach. I can see that where there are flagrant issues such as potentially libellous statements about living persons then immediate action is needed, but in a case like this I think it would be more appropriate, rather than immediately to mutilate the work that contributors have done, to raise your issues with them and listen to their point of view. There are further background issues in this case, such as the fact that the original webpage was archived, and that its authorship was clearly by a voluntary community organisation concerned to encourage tourism, an objective which would only be advanced by the inclusion of further details on Wikipedia. I might mention that I have no personal connection or interest with the community involved; I simply stumbled across the article by accident and felt that the original authors had missed an obvious trick.
However, now that you have destroyed the work I did I am not going to waste time trying to make additional drafting changes to meet your objections. The community involved will have to make do without this little advertisement. Deipnosophista ( talk) 11:04, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
We Are Water Protectors you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
BennyOnTheLoose --
BennyOnTheLoose (
talk)
08:41, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
today: violin solo, yes, the Melody and you can listen Gerda Arendt ( talk) 14:12, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article
We Are Water Protectors you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:We Are Water Protectors for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
BennyOnTheLoose --
BennyOnTheLoose (
talk)
13:22, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I Joined wikipiedia because I want to make a page for a charity group I am involved with. I actually have no idea about the process on making a page. -- Bhandarikushal ( talk) 13:04, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi DanCherek! I've seen how helpful you been in the past with copyright issues so I thought I would ask to see if you could help me how to address possible copyright issues on article Seán Scanlan, as copyright issues on Wikipedia are not my forte. I was patrolling recent changes and I noticed that there was a large amount of information removed in the edit here: [1]. When I was looking for sources to see if I could re-add any information with a refence, I noticed the article was very similar to this source [2], which Earwig's tool seems to confirm: [3]. I proceeded to rewrite some of the article and wanted to see if you could take a look at it and make sure my rewrite meets guidelines and then also advice on how address this possible copyright issue. Thanks for any help and advice! Wikipedialuva ( talk) 03:12, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
why did you change my sex worker edit did ı do wrong? Volkan1881 ( talk) 14:54, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Dan Cherek Exactly, I want to learn the correct way to upload audio files and images and the correct way to work within the wiki community. -- Nourah.Alkhaldi79 ( talk) 22:23, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
This award is given to DanCherek for 30 reviews in the July NPP backlog reduction drive. Your contributions played a part in the 9895 reviews that took place during the drive. Thank you for your contributions. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 09:08, 3 August 2022 (UTC) |
I want my page to be called ANDSOFORTH how do I change that? -- Emstuandsoforth ( talk) 10:39, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Women in Green GA Editathon — July '22 | |
Thank you for your excellent contributions to We Are Water Protectors at the WiG "Women and the Environment" editathon event! All the best, Alanna the Brave ( talk) 15:44, 4 August 2022 (UTC) |
Hi Dan! A couple days ago, I started working on CopyPatrol after becoming aware of it through your RfA (which I am glad to see is going swimmingly), and I wanted to ask for your feedback on this case which I handled. I removed the copyright-violating text and instructed the editor that material must be presented in one's own words; the copyvio has since been revdel'd by an admin. The editor presented a re-phrased version of the material in question: the abstract of the journal which is the subject of the article. While I personally was satisfied with the re-wording, part of me is wondering if it still falls afoul of close paraphrasing due to the structural similarity between the article section as it currently stands, and the abstract. Do you think anything more needs to be done? Dylan620 (he/him · talk · edits) 14:13, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello DanCherek,
After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.
Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.
{{subst:NPR invite}}on their talk page.
Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
I added the "Performance" paragraph to the "Saturn-Shuttle" page after seeing this in the same description on nasa.fandom.com. I simply wanted to update the wikipedia entry. Bigmanhelperhouseman ( talk) 22:16, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Hey - I'm jumping the gun a bit here, but I don't think I'm going to jinx anything. Congratulations on what has been the least controversial RfA I can remember witnessing. Enjoy the new buttons :) Girth Summit (blether) 08:03, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
:P
firefly (
t ·
c )
10:46, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I am finishing up with a draft I am creating and I would like to change the name of the draft. Is that something that I can do? -- CheyenneDeBolt ( talk) 16:10, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, could you help me understand why my sources on the Shelem page don't meet reliability requirements? Most are news articles or links to his music repertoire. He is the subject of all the articles used. Would you mind looking over page for Shelem and help me understand how to improve? -- CheyenneDeBolt ( talk) 17:41, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations!
It is my great pleasure to inform you that
your Request for Adminship has
closed successfully and you are
now an administrator!
|
I was the first one to comment on your RfA, and I thought it would be nice to be the last supporter. But I was 20 minutes late. Anyways, welcome to the admin-corps.
If you have any questions or doubts, please feel to ask me, or any admins. Most of the admins are very co-operative, and helpful, not all of them though. The only thing currently confuses me is hist-merge. See you around :-) —usernamekiran (talk) 19:02, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations on your successful RFA! Carrying on a tradition, allow me to impart the words of wisdom I received from Katie after my RFA passed almost seven long, exhausting, and questionable years ago: |
|
DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales, because if it did, it would be much, much better. All rights released under GFDL. |
This is the second time this year I saw someone with a RfA of 0 opposes. (The previous one was Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Firefly.) Good job (but it's not a big deal)! weeklyd3 ( block | talk | contributions) 17:24, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
.sysop-show
are only shown to sysops and people who explicitly show them like me)
weeklyd3 (
block |
talk |
contributions)
17:57, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello @ DanCherek, Good day Congrats you're an admin now. I'm glad you assist me previously twice. I want to take up new role and replace you. Would you mind guiding me with the copy patrol tool. I have slight low experience with copyright violation and revdel. Thanks C1K98V ( 💬 ✒️ 📂) 04:51, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Dear Dan Cherek, I am creating a bio page and I saw that you deleted it. Why? The bot said that it was deleted because it references Amazon when that company is not included in the article. Bottom line how much do I have to pay for this free service? Thank you. Kyle Kyle Langdon-Weyrich ( talk) 17:42, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Congrats! -- Victor Trevor ( talk) 18:45, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations! — Diannaa ( talk) 18:54, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() | Congratulations DanCherek! Your RfA was successful. You are now an administrator on the English Wikipedia. I hope you have just as happy a time editing in the future as you did before your RfA. You may want to look at the admin guide to read up on any tools you are unfamiliar with. |
Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 18:59, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Congrats from me as well! – Kavyansh.Singh ( talk) 06:39, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Source is https://www.highschoolofdundee.org.uk/uploads/tinymce/Neil%20Douglas%20Tribute.pdf, not the Scotsman. Perhaps you could clean it up if problematic, rather than just deleting it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7E:4CCF:8E00:D9F8:1D89:26DD:5ADA ( talk) 22:59, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
A baton for you! |
Congratulations on a successful RfA. Between you,
Firefly, and myself, now all three records tracked at
RFX200 and
RFX300—highest unopposed, unanimous, and raw support—are held by 2022 RfAs, which is quite something given that there have only been 5 successful RfAs this year!
Stats geekery aside, I know you'll be an amazing admin. I'm sure you'll have access to counsel from admins much more experienced than me, but do know that I'm around. As you take my place as the juniormost admin, I thought I'd recognize that in some way by passing this baton on to you. Maybe when the next successful RfA occurs (which may be sometime soon, but
Mazel tov, new administrator. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 19:41, 9 August 2022 (UTC) |
I am not getting why you deleted it. The AfD was more than 1 year ago and most of the participants who voted for "Delete" wrongly predicted that the subject won't get any coverage after the controversy that was going on at the time. All of this has been proven wrong and the subject is still getting coverage. [5] [6] It is not even uncommon to re-create the article once the subject has gained more notability. A similar example would be this article which was created less than 2 months after the AfD [7] because the subject was more notable now.
It will absolutely end up being kept if an AfD is ever initiated. You should restore the article and its talk page. -- Yoonadue ( talk) 04:18, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'd like some help with referencing. I am using some of my sources in multiple parts of my article. How do I use the same source in various locations without creating a new "reference" in the list? ie if I want to use reference [1] first then use it after references [2,3,4] but don't want it to show as [5]. -- CheyenneDeBolt ( talk) 16:31, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Hey DanCherek. First off, congratulations on your successful RFA.
You declined my histmerge request on Cascade de Soulou with the reasoning of "a histmerge is not needed here as the content in both pages was added by the same editor, so there are no attribution issues that need to be repaired". The creation of the main article is currently attributed to me when it should be attributed to the other editor. I'm only listed as the creator because I draftified the original article, which left behind a redirect with a G2 CSD tag, and they pasted the content before the CSD could be reviewed. I'm new to requesting histmerge, so I won't be at all surprised if I'm wrong, but isn't this part of the reason that histmerges are done? Hey man im josh ( talk) 22:40, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
For over 100 article reviews during 2021. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 08:20, 16 August 2022 (UTC) |
Congrats on one of the most successful RfA ever! And thanks for mopping up three of my User drafts so quickly. Best wishes, Mr Serjeant Buzfuz ( talk) 14:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, i was wondering why my edit was removed? it included other sourced information apart from the encyclopedia one.
NameIsShaheer (
talk)
20:39, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
another ones are the famous love story of Sassi and Punnu whose love became a tale for many to remember. [1]The rest was copied from [8]. DanCherek ( talk) 20:44, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
References
I made this article by mistake here thinking it didn't exist, wondering if you could delete it.
My article:
Manuel Flaco Ibáñez
Original article (I though did not exist: Manuel "Flaco" Ibáñez Casint ( talk) 02:30, 20 August 2022 (UTC)