Maybe, though it's an enormous can of worms to delve into at all. American (word) is already an unholy mess; and Pan-American (word) could probably be an unholy mess as well - nothing related to the Americas is easy or one-sentence-y, in my experience. Cheers, Wily D 11:57, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, in more detail than I provided in the article (because its quite complicated, but I thought people would be able to understand the wording and realise what I was talking about), the Queen is a 1st cousin, 4 times removed, to all of her children, due to them all being descendents of Queen Victoria and Princess Mary Adelaide of Cambridge, who were 1st cousins as grandchildren of King George III. The closer family connection was provided for when Victoria's grandson, the future George V, married Mary Adelaide's daughter, Mary of Teck. The source is the ancestry charts on Wiki which show the previous generations of the Royal Family. Nocrowx ( talk) 21:29, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I have given you a week to reply to my earlier section titled 'The Queen', which you have not yet done; I have been waiting for you to revert your last edit to the page in question as you promised you would do when I provided the justification for the inclusion of this noteworthy information. If you do not respond soon, I shall have to revert your edit for you and assume you are happy with the inclusion of my edit.
With best intentions, Nocrowx ( talk) 20:46, 24 January 2011 (UTC) ' information is gold '.
Oh of-course BE is American for over 100 years. Yogesh Khandke ( talk) 13:47, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
The correction inserted the country name to maintain a complete description of a location [1]. Please inform otherwise. > g2g886 ( talk) 02:49, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello Chipmunkdavis, I have recently discovered that File:Flag of Belarus.svg does not exist, but over 500 pages link to it, I do not have the capabilities to upload SVG from my computer and I was wondering if you could possibly upload one based on this PNG image. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 16:52, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello, can you exclude Romania Bulgaria and Cyprus from the map File:Schengen_Area.svg please. (because I don't know how to edit svg files :) -- Camoka4 ( talk) 14:59, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Im going to pretend you are 12 years old and i will word this in extremely simple English since you clearly failed to understand my last message. First question:
It would seem that the negative content in this article should be sourced or immediately removed. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 08:22, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello, it seem Denmark, which was shown as having legalised same sex marriage, isn't anymore in the new map you edited. Denmark do recognise these marriage. -- Aréat ( talk) 15:57, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
//The laws are to prevent children committing criminal offenses, but most countries with these laws put heavy penalties on anyone giving the alcohol to children, so there's no theoretical way for them to drink it.//
Without intending any insult or condescension, someone old enough to vote, sign contracts on one's own, and join the Army is not a child, and even though I'm now 25 myself, I still don't appreciate the implication that children can vote or join the Army because alcohol law makes it seem that way. Just because voting age and military age (and indeed draft age in the case of males) adults are forbidden from alcohol by an outdated series of laws, this does not make them minors. (For indeed they are not minors.)
Someday the powers that be will grow a pair, and the Amethyst Initiative and Choose Responsibility will finally succeed in changing the law, but until then this is something to consider when commenting. The Mysterious El Willstro ( talk) 06:15, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Pentecost falls on the tenth day after Ascension Thursday (40 days after Easter). The sentence above is formally confusing , on its face . This sentence is the last line of the introductory paragraph . I could delve into the formal reasons for this structure/meaning confusion ,but the obviousness of the problem , would argue against any such tiresome chore . The , all too apparent , shoddy syntax , could be easily remedied by the deletion of the parentheses and the addition of 2 words to render the phrase therein as a clausal construct . Well , " eezy-peezy " you might think - if your inner dialogue included late 90's idiom - but , as it turns out , not so . The last time I engaged in this sort of ad-hoc syntactical smoothing for the purpose of clarifying , not changing , a writer's meaning - I believe it was , as basic as, noun-verb number agreement - my virtual knuckles were smartly rapped with a threat to report and then brand me with some odious Acronym . Needless to say , I refrained from reverting , nor did I engage in disputation , for a number of reasons . At this point , I could go on , concerning the distinction between proof-reading and editorial concerns , but I won't -- And I won't alter the confused and confusing sentence that occasioned this overly prolix diatribe .Bjhodge8 (talk) 05:44, 27 January 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bjhodge8 ( talk • contribs)
I posted the above on the , /info/en/?search=Pentecost talk-page . I think I need some friendly guidance . B
Hi there, I did some digging, and I found out the notorious Georgian sockmaster Satt2, who had a frantic POV to try and push Georgia into Europe and break all its Asian bonds, really had a dislike for you. He created tons of socks over the span of many years all having the same insane obsession, namely "preaching" this Georgia is Europe agenda on Wikipedia. He often created socks with hate names referring to you ( "Meurtrierdechipmunk", "Chipmunkmustdie", etc.) as well. Does this all ring some bells, perhaps? Well, he has returned on a new sock and has managed to dodge the bullet for a few months now. Glad I found the SPI case. Considering you had alot of interaction with previous socks, would you mind presenting your opinion here on the SPI case?. Bests and thanks - LouisAragon ( talk) 01:57, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I've recently started to help out using the 'citation hunt' page. I need to know the etiquette regarding facially absurd, or, after considerable research, unsupported 'facts' that have been cite-tagged. Should I go ahead and cut the passage or post to talk-page first? Sorry to bother you with this. Thanks. Bjhodge8 ( talk) 22:04, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I've addressed the concerns you raised for Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Isha_Gramotsavam. Regstuff ( talk) 15:39, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Hey Chipmunkdavis. Do you mind if I set up a bot archive at Talk:Singapore from 2016 onwards? It is easier than the year based archives. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 03:01, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Hey, I thought I'd try additional input. I would appreciate your input there, as the only editor who's joined in the discussion from WP-en, and someone (who like Jedi on the other side) is willing to collaborate.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — kwami ( talk) 04:20, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Yeah, I couldn't figure out how to link to specific version of a map. — kwami ( talk) 02:21, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah ( talk) 15:26, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. It was hard to fix the plot section while in a house that was very loud because of a kid's birthday party, followed by a loud friend's apartment. I apologize if I sounded rude in my comments. SL93 ( talk) 02:42, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Alright. Thank you. I'll take a look at it. Herostratus ( talk) 00:21, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Sorry to push this more, I know it is disappointing for it to be delayed, but really I feel that our work will get barely any clicks at the very bottom of Queue 3, as opposed to being accompanied by an image; so I opened Wikipedia talk:Did you know § Jueteng. My own experience tells me this, as Deseret alphabet is my highest performing DYK clickwise, and had an image. Psiĥedelisto ( talk • contribs) please always ping! 21:49, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for the catch on that reference in Marcos jewels. I've added the references from elsewhere in the article to cover the forfeiture of all three collections, and the dismissal of the petition over the Malacanang collection (which I also clarified in the text), plus proposals for auction in 2016. I also did a search and added two entirely new references that refer to auction plans in 2014, 2019, and 2020. I tried to address everything in your tag in six edits linked here. Again, thank you for the catch! Yours, Chieharumachi ( talk) 13:40, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Chipmunkdavis, do you plan to return to your review here, or should I find someone else to finish it? Please let me know. Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 00:33, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for helping with the DYK nomination on K-23. Im still new to this, and was wondering how I can check the status on the DYK nomination? Thank you for your time. - 420Traveler ( talk) 01:53, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Which specific TC season articles were you mentioning? Noah Talk 13:48, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
In response to your edit summary, [4] that apparently wasn't just another copying from another Wikipedia article, but spinning a section off a main article and expanding that section into an article with more details, while downsizing that section within the main article according to summary style. Please enlighten on the relevant guideline for such edits, given most of these non-contentious and straightforward ones are performed all across Wikipedia without discussions. Thanks and regards. 219.73.29.243 ( talk) 02:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Proud of my African articles and pleased to see you added them to the 10,000 challenge. My prime driver is gender but its just part of the diversity and equality we strive for. Victuallers ( talk) 09:50, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Hey Chipmunkdavis, I know you had a problem with my recent AfD nominations but I just wanted to say I feel like the quote you have on your page is great and pretty relevant in our disagreement:
"There is a habit among editors to look at how the text of an article changes, rather than what the text says. There is a presumption that if text moves from one POV then it must be moving towards another POV (and so we see opposing POVs waxing and waning rather than seeing it for what it is: a settling at a NPOV)."
That's not meant to be snappy or sarcastic. I just genuinely feel like my WP:BOLD edits are helping build a WP:NPOV and add WP:VERIFIABLE information. Much of the information on the Ora (currency) article was incorrect and not supported by sources. I also personally believe, and you may disagree, that Orania Representative Council fails WP:GNG. I appreciate the engagement but I will say I was a bit perturbed by the immediate suggestion that I be topic banned or worse. If this message feels inappropriate, I understand and feel free to delete and ignore. Just wanted to reach out in good faith to explain why I am doing what I am doing. Desertambition ( talk) 10:23, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi CMD! I noticed that you're a member of WP:COUNTRIES and you've also been somewhat involved in the past at Henley Passport Index (which is produced by my employer, Henley & Partners), so I'm hoping you might have some familiarity with the subject matter and would be willing to help out with a content issue.
In short, I initiated a discussion at Talk:Henley & Partners#Major changes made without consensus after an editor made several sweeping changes without discussion in mid-March, most of which I considered either WP:COATRACK additions, additions that relied too heavily on a WP:BIASED source, or arbitrary removals of sourced content. Another editor, User:15, wrote that they largely agreed with me and said they would revert the bulk of the undiscussed changes. But then 15 abruptly stopped editing (their last edit was Apr. 5), so the article since then has remained basically unchanged in the non-consensus version - I have not done the revert myself due to my COI. Since then I've been in touch with an editor (Wtmitchell) who is active in articles about the topic of citizenship, who also agreed with 15's approach, but said he was too busy to get involved.
I'm hoping you can read the talk page discussion and, if you agree, revert the disputed changes ( 1, 2, 3) to whatever extent you feel is appropriate, to allow consensus to be reached properly. Thank you, Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 12:50, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I wanted to ask about why you didn't consider a redirect for Bricherhaff, I mean Eitermillen was redirected to Contern by a trusted user for the same reasons you proded Bricherhaff, what about WP:ATD?
Also about the article itslef, I agree, it's not good quality and right now it's non-notable, if I can find sources, that could change but until then, we are on the same page. N1TH Music ( talk) 14:29, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi, you reverted an edit that I made on the Kaktovik numerals page. The change simply reworded the link to the Eskimo-Aleut language family to more inclusively use the actual names of the relevant language sub-families, namely the Inuit and Yupik languages. If you could help me understand the revert, that would be very much appreciated! Thanks! Dowobeha ( talk) 07:04, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello @ Chipmunkdavis !
I am a fellow wikipedian, and I recently published a new article called Disability in Kenya, because I thought it was primordial to provide knowledge on disabilities in this specific country. This country's norms, perceptions, myths, and policies around persons with disabilities are unique, and as I am particularly close to Kenya, I think this article is valuabe.
But since I am quite new to Wikipedia, I wanted to know if I could get your feedback on this article. I saw that you commented on the Kenya talk page, so I thought it would be great to reach out to you!
Thank you in advance.
~~~~ Zp 2298 ( talk) 17:29, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Chipmunkdavis,
When I browsed Lunar New Year page, I saw the first sentence is "Lunar New Year is the beginning of a lunar calendar or lunisolar calendar year, whose months are moon cycles." I kinda suspect if that is correct. Since the pure lunar calendar does not have an intercalation that appears in lunisolar calendar, the date of new year does not aligned in these two calendars. IIRC, the difference will be around 11 days when both of them finished one year cycle. I cannot find and refer you a page of concrete calculation process, but I think the Wikipedia page of lunar calendar and lunisolar calendar are sufficient mentioned enough about the calendar difference. To avoid confusion for readers, I think there should be a better way to distinguish them. There may be some cultures call them as the equivalent, but this kind of case should be addressed separately. I am not sure how to submit the suggestion of this page, so I browsed contribution history and found you might be the right person to explain my thoughts.
Let me know what is your suggestion.
Best Hailaishoya ( talk) 04:25, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi CMD, hope you're doing well. We interacted several months ago when you took part in a discussion at Talk:Henley & Partners, and I'm hoping you won't mind doing so once more. I recently proposed two content changes at Talk:Henley & Partners#Fixing misleading language in two places. Can you please take a look, and implement my suggestions in the article if they seem reasonable to you? Thanks! Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 08:00, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Maybe, though it's an enormous can of worms to delve into at all. American (word) is already an unholy mess; and Pan-American (word) could probably be an unholy mess as well - nothing related to the Americas is easy or one-sentence-y, in my experience. Cheers, Wily D 11:57, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, in more detail than I provided in the article (because its quite complicated, but I thought people would be able to understand the wording and realise what I was talking about), the Queen is a 1st cousin, 4 times removed, to all of her children, due to them all being descendents of Queen Victoria and Princess Mary Adelaide of Cambridge, who were 1st cousins as grandchildren of King George III. The closer family connection was provided for when Victoria's grandson, the future George V, married Mary Adelaide's daughter, Mary of Teck. The source is the ancestry charts on Wiki which show the previous generations of the Royal Family. Nocrowx ( talk) 21:29, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I have given you a week to reply to my earlier section titled 'The Queen', which you have not yet done; I have been waiting for you to revert your last edit to the page in question as you promised you would do when I provided the justification for the inclusion of this noteworthy information. If you do not respond soon, I shall have to revert your edit for you and assume you are happy with the inclusion of my edit.
With best intentions, Nocrowx ( talk) 20:46, 24 January 2011 (UTC) ' information is gold '.
Oh of-course BE is American for over 100 years. Yogesh Khandke ( talk) 13:47, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
The correction inserted the country name to maintain a complete description of a location [1]. Please inform otherwise. > g2g886 ( talk) 02:49, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello Chipmunkdavis, I have recently discovered that File:Flag of Belarus.svg does not exist, but over 500 pages link to it, I do not have the capabilities to upload SVG from my computer and I was wondering if you could possibly upload one based on this PNG image. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 16:52, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello, can you exclude Romania Bulgaria and Cyprus from the map File:Schengen_Area.svg please. (because I don't know how to edit svg files :) -- Camoka4 ( talk) 14:59, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Im going to pretend you are 12 years old and i will word this in extremely simple English since you clearly failed to understand my last message. First question:
It would seem that the negative content in this article should be sourced or immediately removed. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 08:22, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello, it seem Denmark, which was shown as having legalised same sex marriage, isn't anymore in the new map you edited. Denmark do recognise these marriage. -- Aréat ( talk) 15:57, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
//The laws are to prevent children committing criminal offenses, but most countries with these laws put heavy penalties on anyone giving the alcohol to children, so there's no theoretical way for them to drink it.//
Without intending any insult or condescension, someone old enough to vote, sign contracts on one's own, and join the Army is not a child, and even though I'm now 25 myself, I still don't appreciate the implication that children can vote or join the Army because alcohol law makes it seem that way. Just because voting age and military age (and indeed draft age in the case of males) adults are forbidden from alcohol by an outdated series of laws, this does not make them minors. (For indeed they are not minors.)
Someday the powers that be will grow a pair, and the Amethyst Initiative and Choose Responsibility will finally succeed in changing the law, but until then this is something to consider when commenting. The Mysterious El Willstro ( talk) 06:15, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Pentecost falls on the tenth day after Ascension Thursday (40 days after Easter). The sentence above is formally confusing , on its face . This sentence is the last line of the introductory paragraph . I could delve into the formal reasons for this structure/meaning confusion ,but the obviousness of the problem , would argue against any such tiresome chore . The , all too apparent , shoddy syntax , could be easily remedied by the deletion of the parentheses and the addition of 2 words to render the phrase therein as a clausal construct . Well , " eezy-peezy " you might think - if your inner dialogue included late 90's idiom - but , as it turns out , not so . The last time I engaged in this sort of ad-hoc syntactical smoothing for the purpose of clarifying , not changing , a writer's meaning - I believe it was , as basic as, noun-verb number agreement - my virtual knuckles were smartly rapped with a threat to report and then brand me with some odious Acronym . Needless to say , I refrained from reverting , nor did I engage in disputation , for a number of reasons . At this point , I could go on , concerning the distinction between proof-reading and editorial concerns , but I won't -- And I won't alter the confused and confusing sentence that occasioned this overly prolix diatribe .Bjhodge8 (talk) 05:44, 27 January 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bjhodge8 ( talk • contribs)
I posted the above on the , /info/en/?search=Pentecost talk-page . I think I need some friendly guidance . B
Hi there, I did some digging, and I found out the notorious Georgian sockmaster Satt2, who had a frantic POV to try and push Georgia into Europe and break all its Asian bonds, really had a dislike for you. He created tons of socks over the span of many years all having the same insane obsession, namely "preaching" this Georgia is Europe agenda on Wikipedia. He often created socks with hate names referring to you ( "Meurtrierdechipmunk", "Chipmunkmustdie", etc.) as well. Does this all ring some bells, perhaps? Well, he has returned on a new sock and has managed to dodge the bullet for a few months now. Glad I found the SPI case. Considering you had alot of interaction with previous socks, would you mind presenting your opinion here on the SPI case?. Bests and thanks - LouisAragon ( talk) 01:57, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I've recently started to help out using the 'citation hunt' page. I need to know the etiquette regarding facially absurd, or, after considerable research, unsupported 'facts' that have been cite-tagged. Should I go ahead and cut the passage or post to talk-page first? Sorry to bother you with this. Thanks. Bjhodge8 ( talk) 22:04, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I've addressed the concerns you raised for Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Isha_Gramotsavam. Regstuff ( talk) 15:39, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Hey Chipmunkdavis. Do you mind if I set up a bot archive at Talk:Singapore from 2016 onwards? It is easier than the year based archives. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 03:01, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Hey, I thought I'd try additional input. I would appreciate your input there, as the only editor who's joined in the discussion from WP-en, and someone (who like Jedi on the other side) is willing to collaborate.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — kwami ( talk) 04:20, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Yeah, I couldn't figure out how to link to specific version of a map. — kwami ( talk) 02:21, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah ( talk) 15:26, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. It was hard to fix the plot section while in a house that was very loud because of a kid's birthday party, followed by a loud friend's apartment. I apologize if I sounded rude in my comments. SL93 ( talk) 02:42, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Alright. Thank you. I'll take a look at it. Herostratus ( talk) 00:21, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Sorry to push this more, I know it is disappointing for it to be delayed, but really I feel that our work will get barely any clicks at the very bottom of Queue 3, as opposed to being accompanied by an image; so I opened Wikipedia talk:Did you know § Jueteng. My own experience tells me this, as Deseret alphabet is my highest performing DYK clickwise, and had an image. Psiĥedelisto ( talk • contribs) please always ping! 21:49, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for the catch on that reference in Marcos jewels. I've added the references from elsewhere in the article to cover the forfeiture of all three collections, and the dismissal of the petition over the Malacanang collection (which I also clarified in the text), plus proposals for auction in 2016. I also did a search and added two entirely new references that refer to auction plans in 2014, 2019, and 2020. I tried to address everything in your tag in six edits linked here. Again, thank you for the catch! Yours, Chieharumachi ( talk) 13:40, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Chipmunkdavis, do you plan to return to your review here, or should I find someone else to finish it? Please let me know. Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 00:33, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for helping with the DYK nomination on K-23. Im still new to this, and was wondering how I can check the status on the DYK nomination? Thank you for your time. - 420Traveler ( talk) 01:53, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Which specific TC season articles were you mentioning? Noah Talk 13:48, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
In response to your edit summary, [4] that apparently wasn't just another copying from another Wikipedia article, but spinning a section off a main article and expanding that section into an article with more details, while downsizing that section within the main article according to summary style. Please enlighten on the relevant guideline for such edits, given most of these non-contentious and straightforward ones are performed all across Wikipedia without discussions. Thanks and regards. 219.73.29.243 ( talk) 02:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Proud of my African articles and pleased to see you added them to the 10,000 challenge. My prime driver is gender but its just part of the diversity and equality we strive for. Victuallers ( talk) 09:50, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Hey Chipmunkdavis, I know you had a problem with my recent AfD nominations but I just wanted to say I feel like the quote you have on your page is great and pretty relevant in our disagreement:
"There is a habit among editors to look at how the text of an article changes, rather than what the text says. There is a presumption that if text moves from one POV then it must be moving towards another POV (and so we see opposing POVs waxing and waning rather than seeing it for what it is: a settling at a NPOV)."
That's not meant to be snappy or sarcastic. I just genuinely feel like my WP:BOLD edits are helping build a WP:NPOV and add WP:VERIFIABLE information. Much of the information on the Ora (currency) article was incorrect and not supported by sources. I also personally believe, and you may disagree, that Orania Representative Council fails WP:GNG. I appreciate the engagement but I will say I was a bit perturbed by the immediate suggestion that I be topic banned or worse. If this message feels inappropriate, I understand and feel free to delete and ignore. Just wanted to reach out in good faith to explain why I am doing what I am doing. Desertambition ( talk) 10:23, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi CMD! I noticed that you're a member of WP:COUNTRIES and you've also been somewhat involved in the past at Henley Passport Index (which is produced by my employer, Henley & Partners), so I'm hoping you might have some familiarity with the subject matter and would be willing to help out with a content issue.
In short, I initiated a discussion at Talk:Henley & Partners#Major changes made without consensus after an editor made several sweeping changes without discussion in mid-March, most of which I considered either WP:COATRACK additions, additions that relied too heavily on a WP:BIASED source, or arbitrary removals of sourced content. Another editor, User:15, wrote that they largely agreed with me and said they would revert the bulk of the undiscussed changes. But then 15 abruptly stopped editing (their last edit was Apr. 5), so the article since then has remained basically unchanged in the non-consensus version - I have not done the revert myself due to my COI. Since then I've been in touch with an editor (Wtmitchell) who is active in articles about the topic of citizenship, who also agreed with 15's approach, but said he was too busy to get involved.
I'm hoping you can read the talk page discussion and, if you agree, revert the disputed changes ( 1, 2, 3) to whatever extent you feel is appropriate, to allow consensus to be reached properly. Thank you, Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 12:50, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I wanted to ask about why you didn't consider a redirect for Bricherhaff, I mean Eitermillen was redirected to Contern by a trusted user for the same reasons you proded Bricherhaff, what about WP:ATD?
Also about the article itslef, I agree, it's not good quality and right now it's non-notable, if I can find sources, that could change but until then, we are on the same page. N1TH Music ( talk) 14:29, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi, you reverted an edit that I made on the Kaktovik numerals page. The change simply reworded the link to the Eskimo-Aleut language family to more inclusively use the actual names of the relevant language sub-families, namely the Inuit and Yupik languages. If you could help me understand the revert, that would be very much appreciated! Thanks! Dowobeha ( talk) 07:04, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello @ Chipmunkdavis !
I am a fellow wikipedian, and I recently published a new article called Disability in Kenya, because I thought it was primordial to provide knowledge on disabilities in this specific country. This country's norms, perceptions, myths, and policies around persons with disabilities are unique, and as I am particularly close to Kenya, I think this article is valuabe.
But since I am quite new to Wikipedia, I wanted to know if I could get your feedback on this article. I saw that you commented on the Kenya talk page, so I thought it would be great to reach out to you!
Thank you in advance.
~~~~ Zp 2298 ( talk) 17:29, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Chipmunkdavis,
When I browsed Lunar New Year page, I saw the first sentence is "Lunar New Year is the beginning of a lunar calendar or lunisolar calendar year, whose months are moon cycles." I kinda suspect if that is correct. Since the pure lunar calendar does not have an intercalation that appears in lunisolar calendar, the date of new year does not aligned in these two calendars. IIRC, the difference will be around 11 days when both of them finished one year cycle. I cannot find and refer you a page of concrete calculation process, but I think the Wikipedia page of lunar calendar and lunisolar calendar are sufficient mentioned enough about the calendar difference. To avoid confusion for readers, I think there should be a better way to distinguish them. There may be some cultures call them as the equivalent, but this kind of case should be addressed separately. I am not sure how to submit the suggestion of this page, so I browsed contribution history and found you might be the right person to explain my thoughts.
Let me know what is your suggestion.
Best Hailaishoya ( talk) 04:25, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi CMD, hope you're doing well. We interacted several months ago when you took part in a discussion at Talk:Henley & Partners, and I'm hoping you won't mind doing so once more. I recently proposed two content changes at Talk:Henley & Partners#Fixing misleading language in two places. Can you please take a look, and implement my suggestions in the article if they seem reasonable to you? Thanks! Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 08:00, 16 February 2023 (UTC)