This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Henley & Partners article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Henley & Partners. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
I have read the disputed article and I am not able to find an NPOV nor a COI issue. The text is written objectively and properly backed by sources. I suggest deleting the maintenance template.
Have a great day. - User:Modurr —Preceding undated comment added 09:01, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Agree in principle, whilst this article does seem to have been biased initially when setup, it appears that objective and has been adequately addressed a since flagging this. Looks like a dormant discussion on this 78.24.33.244 ( talk) 14:41, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Since no person has responded, can I suggest we delete the NPOV & COI Dispute templates? Waterpr8f ( talk) 11:45, 06 June 2019 (UTC)
I saw this on other pages on Wikipedia before: There are several companies/people blamed on Wikipedia that they are involved in the Daphne Galizia case. However, by now it is clear who the perpetrators were and those companies accused on Wikipedia have nothing to do with it. There are certainly other editors with more experience than me but I personally don't think that those blaming-paragraphs are correct. Can I suggest deleting them? Fisherman887 ( talk) 19:55, 04 February 2020 (UTC)
In my opinion, it is fair to have the discussions (pros- and cons) about the Maltese Individual Investor Programme under Criticism and Controversy but I agree, the connection to Daphne Galizia is outdated and misleading and the Shift News as a source might also be critical. Waterpr8f ( talk) 10:58, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
I have tagged this article {{ undisclosed paid}}; it has been heavily targeted by the GlobeClimber/KraYa sockfarm and suffers from promo issues. This is confirmed UPE, I can provide more detail to OTRS members on request. Blablubbs| talk 09:32, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. [see below] |
Hi, my name is Sarah and I work for Henley & Partners. I recently introduced myself to User:Blablubbs, who encouraged me to propose a redrafted, shorter version of this article to facilitate the removal of the "undisclosed paid" tag. My draft, which can be found at User:Sarah Nicklin/Henley & Partners, is heavily derived from this old revision from April 2018, which was just before the undisclosed paid editing began, as far as I understand. I made sure to leave in content that appears to have been added by legitimate editors.
I have several suggestions in mind for improving and expanding the article, but my first priority is to start over with a clean slate, and only then begin proposing changes here on the Talk page.
Pinging 15 and Blablubbs. Please take a look at the draft and let me know if you think it's a constructive first step in resolving the article's problems, or if it doesn't go far enough, or even if goes too far. Thank you, Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 10:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
The firm has also developed the annual Global Citizen Award, which consists of a USD 50,000 monetary prize.+ sources), given that it has received independent coverage and is hence due for inclusion.
Henley & Partners denied these allegations, confirming that Low was never a client and was specifically rejected as such in 2015.+ source), but replace "confirming" with "asserting" or similar. I'm happy that
Henley & Partners was criticized from time to time [...]was removed from the criticism section in your draft given that it is only loosely related. 15 ( talk) 10:31, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
In addition to advising private clients and governments, Kälin is a speaker and writer[15] who is regularly quoted in the international media.[16][17][18][19][20] Having coined the term ius doni as a stand-in for citizenship-by-investment, Kälin introduced the concept of ius doni into the contemporary legal and political theory of citizenship by providing the first comprehensive academic analysis of the subject.[21]in User:Sarah Nicklin/Henley & Partners § Notes and I'm happy for you to implement the changes (=copy over your draft article and replace the current version with it). It reads too promotional and the level of detail is unneeded, given that Kälin has his own article. There is also a possible sourcing issue with ius doni, which might be best discussed at Kälin's article. 15 ( talk) 22:00, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi Ethanbas, are there specific parts you suggest should be rewritten or trimmed from the article? I am afraid that the tags themselves are not very helpful to me without any further explanation, particularly given the recent rewrite. Best, 15 ( talk) 10:11, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
I'd like to request that the contents of the "Criticism and controversy" section be integrated into the History section, per WP:CSECTION.
Also, please remove the third paragraph (about The Shift News) entirely, as the two sources cited in the paragraph are both from The Shift News, which should not be considered a legitimate source of information about itself. (I also don't think the incident described here is noteworthy enough to merit inclusion in an encyclopedia article about the company, but that may be a moot point due to the improper sourcing.)
Pinging 15 - it would be great if you could weigh in here. Thanks, Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 13:31, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi, this is Sarah from Henley & Partners, here again to propose a few more changes to the article, specifically to the lead section and the History section.
Lead:
Please add the following as the second sentence of the article: "It is the largest investment migration consultancy in the world." The source is the Quartz article that is already cited later in the lead. (This sentence should probably be followed by a paragraph break, though one might legitimately disagree.)
History:
References
Skift
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).Pinging 15 once again - thank you for bearing with me here! Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 14:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
information on post-2015 developmentsto the History section, we can also add the following sentence: In February 2022, Henley & Partners, in partnership with Deep Knowledge Analytics, launched the Best Investment Migration Real Estate Index, an index that compares countries by how welcoming they are for people seeking a secondary residence or citizenship. [1] [2]
References
Henley & Partners advise an undercover journalist about Malta's golden passports" Times of Malta April 23,2021 [1]
Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. |
Hello, it's Sarah again, with a few more proposed changes and additions.
Later history
Publications
References
Pinging 15 - thanks in advance! Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 15:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Recently, this article was overhauled in a single edit with no edit summary and no Talk page discussion. Several very significant changes were made, including summarily replacing the primary description of the company in the lead, tossing out large chunks of well-sourced consensus-based content throughout the article and adding multiple paragraphs of WP:COATRACK content framed inappropriately as criticism of the article's subject.
The impetus for these changes appears to have been the recent publication of an investigative report by the OCCRP. While the OCCRP does have editorial control and other hallmarks of good journalism, most Wikipedia editors will surely agree that it is a biased and opinionated source (see the organization's own description of itself and its mission) and thus the content it produces should be given in-text attribution and appropriate counterbalance on Wikipedia - not used to effectively override other reliable sources and treated as the final word on the subject.
I would request that the edit in question be reverted (of course, I will not do so myself due to my conflict of interest) and the changes discussed here on the Talk page first. Pinging 15 and Snooganssnoogans as a courtesy. Thank you, Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 09:12, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
The merger proposal - I propose merging Henley Passport Index into Henley & Partners. I think the content in Henley Passport Index can easily be explained in the context of Henley & Partners, and a merger would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in Henley & Partners. The existence of the Henley Passport Index page is purely promotional. Thenightaway ( talk) 16:21, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
The merger proposal - I propose merging Quality of Nationality Index into Henley & Partners. I think the content in Quality of Nationality Index can easily be explained in the context of Henley & Partners, and a merger would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in Henley & Partners. The existence of the Quality of Nationality Index page is purely promotional. Thenightaway ( talk) 16:25, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
For all my edits on any other page, everything goes well. On this particular page, user:Thenightaway is always destroying my edits. I have already discussed on teahouse and wanted to post this here before taking it to WP:ANI. Such actions are definitely making me feel unsafe in this environment. I make sure that only key information with WP:RS sources are provided. I am politely requesting the community to help me with this. user:Thenightaway, I am also requesting you to participate in this discussion. You never replied to my discussion on Teahouse either. I am trying to understand why you only have a problem with my edits on this particular page. Although, my expertise lies in topics I have mentioned on my talk page, I only include important information and correct sources. ANLgrad ( talk) 16:42, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Based on the discussion on teahouse regarding building up of Publications section and consensus for the same, I am pasting the discussion link here for others to refer to - /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive_1171#Building_up_a_section ANLgrad ( talk) 15:56, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. |
Hi everyone. I'd like to propose restoring the "Impact" section, which was deleted several months ago along with most of its content, with the terse edit summary "these are not rs." The content of the section that was deleted (not including the sentence about the Global Citizen Award, which was partly preserved elsewhere in the article) is as follows:
The claim that the prominent Maltese news outlets Malta Today and The Malta Independent are "not rs" is baseless, and the content itself is pertinent, encyclopedic and WP:DUE, so I would ask that the section be restored.
In addition, the Impact section could reasonably be bolstered by other encyclopedic information, as follows:
References
Thank you, Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 13:16, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi everyone. There are two places where I've noticed the language is still misleading.
Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 09:20, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I’d like to start a discussion here on the current version of the article. It is very alarming that this page always seems to attract negative information in big chunks and positive/neutral information in minimal updates. There are tons of news stories which reflect Henley & Partners in a positive light, but don’t see its way on the page. There is no ownership of any sort, and therefore a neutral mix of edits should be allowed and tolerated on the page. Recently, a few lines with sources which were neutral and fact-based have been removed.
Removal of such content doesn’t seem to be appropriate and fair. I urge the Wikipedia community to check and add it back as this is unfair. In the Malta subsection, a huge piece of negative information has been added with undue weight to the English PEN statement along with a blockquote which is not required. In that case many positive blockquotes should be added too. This is done just to sabotage the page and if someone can be kind enough to correct this.
References
"supporting economic recovery, improving key macroeconomic balances and boosting bank liquidity"
National Development and Social Fund (NDSF). The fund receives 70 percent of its contributions from the country's citizenship program. These initiatives and projects are intended to develop and improve the economy, public services, and the general well-being of present and future generations.
Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 19:06, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi everyone, this is Sarah from Henley & Partners here again to propose a few more changes to the article. I'd like to propose fixing of the information that was recently added.
I am hoping other editors will pitch in here so we can get to a neutral version of the article. Pinging 15 and SMcCandlish to help please. Thank you.
References
Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 19:09, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
In May 2018 company representatives told a European Parliament delegation that was investigating the rule of law in Malta, "The point of the email was to ask the government if they would be ok with a legal action H&P was planning to take (which can have political repercussions)."
So it is clear to everyone, I am reproducing in full the paragraph in question from just before my first edit, and as a result of my last edit:
By SMcCandlish at 17:10, 21 June 2023:
In 2017, Henley colluded with top Maltese politicians to launch lawsuits against investigative journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia who was reporting on Henley's programs in Malta. Leaked email exchanges between top Henley officials (including CEO Christian Kalin), Malta prime minister Joseph Muscat, Justice Minister Owen Bonnici and Individual Investment Program CEO Jonathan Cardona discussing launching a SLAPP (Strategic lawsuit against public participation) lawsuit against Galizia that was intended to financially cripple her for her reporting.
By Xan747 at 22:38, 2 July 2023:
In May 2017, Maltese journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia accused Kälin of "collusion" with top Maltese politicians to threaten her and "three media houses" with lawsuits over their coverage of the company's activities in the country. She said that she had obtained leaked email exchanges between Kälin, Malta prime minister Joseph Muscat, Justice Minister Owen Bonnici and Individual Investment Program CEO Jonathan Cardona wherein they planned to send threats of filing "financially ruinous and extremely cumbersome" SLAPP (Strategic lawsuit against public participation) lawsuits in UK courts. She said that the emails also discussed sending legal threats to opposition MP Jason Azzopardi, but that a decision was ultimately made to focus the threats solely on herself. In May 2018 company representatives told a European Parliament delegation that was investigating the rule of law in Malta, "The point of the email was to ask the government if they would be ok with a legal action H&P was planning to take (which can have political repercussions)." As of February 2023, no legal inquiries have been initiated against Henley or Kälin. In September 2020, her son, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Matthew Caruana Galizia, provided a court of inquiry with copies of her notes, some call logs, and the leaked emails. He testified that Henley had picked the UK for its "friendly libel laws" and because it wanted a "sympathetic judge".
Italics added to highlight addition of material defending Henley's actions. Now to address the concerns in your original edit request:
You later requested to change "conspire" to "discussed" because, according to you, that's the term RS used. SMcCandlish argued that RS need not use a term for Wikipedia editors to use it, and their edit changed "conspired" to "colluded", using Wikipedia's voice. I personally feel that such a loaded term should not be done in Wikivoice, but clearly attributed inline to source(s). I found that colluded is the term Carunana Galizia used, so I changed the first sentence of the paragraph to put the collusion allegation into her voice. This is entirely proper and consistent with Wikipedia policy--but it did make the sentence wordier than it had been before.
That brings us to the overall length of the Malta section. There were not "multiple editors who agreed on truncating it as per WP:PROPORTION", there was one: Brenthaven, and their main truncating edits were the PEN blockquote and the assassination mention, neither of which I undid because I agree with them. The only other editor who expressed that the section could be shorter was SMcCandlish, "simply as a matter of article length", not PROPORTION. I don't think the article is too long.
In sum, I dispute that my edits "brought the part back to square one thus ruining efforts of multiple editors who were addressing this issue." I added information in defense of your firm in almost equal proportion to information critical of it. That did have the overall effect of increasing the size of the Malta section, but hardly undid the efforts of other editors.
Reviewing my edit, there is some fat that can be trimmed on the basis of wordiness and extraneous information, and I will get to work on that when I'm done with this note. But I think the substance of my edits gave additional necessary context to the episode that are not only reliably-sourced, but entirely WP:DUE.
Regards, Xan747 ( talk) 20:18, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
your statement that there were no multiple editors who agreed to truncate the verbiage is incorrect.
"multiple editors who agreed on truncating it as per WP:PROPORTION"
In 2017, Henley conspired with top Maltese politicians to launch lawsuits against investigative journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia who was reporting on Henley's programs in Malta. Leaked email exchanges between top Henley officials (including CEO Christian Kalin), Malta prime minister Joseph Muscat, Justice Minister Owen Bonnici and Individual Investment Program CEO Jonathan Cardona discussing launching a SLAPP (Strategic lawsuit against public participation) lawsuit against Galizia that was intended to financially cripple her for her reporting. She was assassinated later that year.
The human rights organization English PEN released a public statement on 1 May 2018 about Caruana Galizia and Henley:
Prime Minister Joseph Muscat is also pursuing a libel case against Caruana Galizia's son Matthew Caruana Galizia. The Shift News, an independent media outlet launched after Caruana Galizia's assassination which has pursued a number of her stories, is currently facing the threat of a financially crippling SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) from the Jersey-based firm Henley & Partners, who had taken legal proceedings against Daphne Caruana Galizia prior to her death. PEN is seriously concerned about the fact that senior government officials including Prime Minister Joseph Muscat are insisting on trying 34 libel cases against Daphne Caruana Galizia, which have now been assumed by her family. PEN believes that these proceedings are in direct reprisal for her work in investigating corruption within the current Maltese government.
In May 2017, Maltese journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia accused Kälin of "collusion" with top Maltese politicians to sue her and "three media houses" over their coverage, and also opposition MP Jason Azzopardi. She published leaked email exchanges between Kälin, Malta prime minister Joseph Muscat, Justice Minister Owen Bonnici and IIP CEO Jonathan Cardona planning threats of "financially ruinous" SLAPP lawsuits in UK courts. In September 2020, her son, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Matthew Caruana Galizia, gave a Maltese court of inquiry her notes, call logs, and the leaked emails. He testified the UK was chosen for its "friendly libel laws" and desire for a "sympathetic judge".
In May 2018, English PEN and The Guardian reported that Henley had threatened to sue Malta-based The Shift News, which continued many of Caruana Galizia's investigations after her death, including her reporting on Henley.
In 2017, Henley colluded with top Maltese politicians to launch lawsuits against investigative journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia who was reporting on Henley's programs in Malta. Leaked email exchanges between top Henley officials (including CEO Christian Kalin), Malta prime minister Joseph Muscat, Justice Minister Owen Bonnici and Individual Investment Program CEO Jonathan Cardona discussing launching a SLAPP (Strategic lawsuit against public participation) lawsuit against Galizia that was intended to financially cripple her for her reporting.
On 1 May 2018, the human rights organization English PEN released a public statement about concerns around the libels cases, from senior government officials of Malta and Henley & Partners, faced by Caruana Galizia’s family and The Shift News, an independent media outlet.
In May 2018 company representatives told a European Parliament delegation that was investigating the rule of law in Malta, "The point of the email was to ask the government if they would be ok with a legal action H&P was planning to take (which can have political repercussions). As a concessionaire of the IIP programme, we wanted to inform the government. We would not go ahead with something like that unless we got at least an informal 'OK' of the key decision makers." As of February 2023, no legal inquiries have been initiated against Henley or Kälin.
Also, a few lines with sources which were neutral and fact-based have been removed. Please restore them as they were factually correct, appropriate and sourced.I think I know which ones you're talking about, and am inclined to restore them, but you need to specify exactly what text you wish to have added back.
“It disgusts me. Henley and Partners is a hacker firm. It targets states where institutions are fragile to expand its business,” says Matthew Caruana Galizia. A Pulitzer Prize winner, he is the son of Daphne Caruana Galizia, a famous investigative journalist who long investigated golden passports before she was murdered in 2017.
According to him, the passport sales program has generated an unhealthy climate and suspicions of corruption. "The institutions have been weakened by the collusion between Christian Kälin and the political world in Malta", he denounces. After the murder of Daphne Caruana Galizia, several Maltese politicians had to resign. Neither Henley and Partners nor Christian Kälin have been the subject of legal inquiries.
As of February 2023, no legal inquiries have been initiated against Henley or Kälin.
In May 2018, English PEN and The Guardian reported that Henley had threatened to sue Malta-based The Shift News, which continued many of Caruana Galizia's investigations after her death, including her reporting on Henley.I think stating it this way makes it more clear that new threats of litigation were issued against other parties after her death. Xan747 ( talk) 20:41, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
In place of "colluded" in a phrase like "In 2017, Henley colluded with top Maltese politicians to launch lawsuits against investigative journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia", we could probably use "cooperated" in Wikipedia's own voice, which has no negative connotation. But there is certainly nothing wrong with a direct quotation (as long as the translation is accurate, if English was not the original language used and the quotations are appropriate under WP:DUE) like 'In May 2017, Maltese journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia accused Kälin of "collusion" with top Maltese politicians to sue her', and "The institutions have been weakened by the collusion between Christian Kälin and the political world in Malta". We're not going to censor use of "collude" in original source material. Not sure I've got anything else particular to advise, because I've not been following these edits in great detail. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 19:50, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
In May 2017, Maltese journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia accused Kälin and other Maltese politicians of collusion to sue her, opposition MP Jason Azzopardi and three media houses over their coverage.
I have in my possession evidence, in the form of email exchanges between the addressees of this message, that Henley & Partners' threat/decision to sue me in the UK courts was taken on instruction from, and in collusion with you, the Prime Minister, Joseph Muscat, his chief of staff, Keith Schembri, and the Justice Minister, Owen Bonnici.The same source also uses the word "colluded" in its own voice, in the lede.
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi everyone, this is Sarah and I'd like to propose a minor addition on the Company infobox to include two fields, Industry and Services. The current version does not include these two fields and are easily available on the company's website and media for the purpose of verification.
Add
Company type | Private |
---|---|
Industry | Consultancy |
Founded | 1997 |
Headquarters | |
Area served | Worldwide |
Key people |
|
Services | Residence-by-investment, Citizenship-by-investment and Real estate advisory |
References
Thanks in advance! Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 15:38, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Edit request implemented Spintendo 18:11, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
I have restored content that was deleted by @ Thenightaway an editor that has displayed sustained negative editorial bias on the page WP:TENDENTIOUS. Constant disruptive editing and possible vandalism. Well referenced neutral content should not be removed again without an explanation on the talk page. ANLgrad ( talk) 22:44, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi Thenightaway, this is regarding your recent edits on the page.
Can you help understand why you have removed WP:RS referenced content from the lead paragraph "despite economic benefits to both the countries"? This line was WP:NPOV neutral and cited.
This WP:RS referenced content that you have removed required an explanation in the edit summary. Can you help understand why you have not left an appropriate edit summary for this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Henley_%26_Partners&diff=prev&oldid=1190101836 I would like to direct you to this page for better understanding of edit summaries WP:SUMMARYNO and WP:EDITSUMCITE
Also you have added contested content back to the page without a consensus. Disputed content should not be added back on the page without a discussion and consensus. I encourage you to understand other editor's perspectives also. I'd like to point you to the contested edits here https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Henley_%26_Partners&diff=prev&oldid=1187863893
ANLgrad ( talk) 00:31, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Based on the discussion on teahouse regarding addition of a line for neutrality - /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive_1213#Showing_both_sides_of_the_picture_for_neutrality
Current text in the lead paragraph - It has been criticised for its core business model, which detractors believe to threaten the fight against cross-border corruption and crime. Henley's immigrant investor programs in Malta and in St. Kitts and Nevis have stirred controversy.
To fairly present the overall impact and for neutrality, the text above could be updated to read as follows-
It has been criticised for its core business model, which detractors believe to threaten the fight against cross-border corruption and crime. Henley's immigrant investor programs in Malta and in St. Kitts and Nevis have stirred controversy. According to a report by the International Monetary Fund, the program has helped St. Kitts and Nevis come out of a four-year recession.
As in WP:RS citation source - https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/st-kitts-and-nevis-citizenship
Viewpoints from teahouse
Remsense - I think this is likely a good start. Talk page discussion will likely further nuance how the points are presented.
ANLgrad ( talk) 00:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
Hi, this is Sarah from H&P. I am proposing one addition along with references.
Please add a new subsection 'Antigua & Barbuda' under the 'History' section after 'St. Kitts and Nevis' subsection for chronological arrangement.
In 2012, Henley & Partners designed Antigua and Barbuda’s Citizenship-by-Investment Programme (CIP) under a government mandate. Through the programme, the country received investments in several sectors which reduced dependency on traditional industries like tourism. [1] [2]
References
Thanks in advance!
Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 10:06, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
@ Buidhe: thanks for weighing in here and I understand your point about the second line and the second source. Can you kindly add the first line and the first source.
In 2012, Henley & Partners designed Antigua and Barbuda’s Citizenship-by-Investment Programme (CIP) under a government mandate. [1]
Thanks in advance!
Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 07:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
The user below has a request that an edit be made to
Henley & Partners. That user has an
actual or apparent
conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is high. Please be very patient. There are currently 168 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
Hi, this is Sarah again from H&P. I am proposing a one line addition along with reference from a reputed newspaper.
Please add a new subsection 'Antigua & Barbuda' under the 'History' section after 'St. Kitts and Nevis' subsection for chronological arrangement.
In 2012, Henley & Partners designed Antigua and Barbuda’s Citizenship-by-Investment Programme (CIP) under a government mandate. [2]
References
Thanks in advance!
Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 07:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Henley & Partners article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Henley & Partners. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
I have read the disputed article and I am not able to find an NPOV nor a COI issue. The text is written objectively and properly backed by sources. I suggest deleting the maintenance template.
Have a great day. - User:Modurr —Preceding undated comment added 09:01, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Agree in principle, whilst this article does seem to have been biased initially when setup, it appears that objective and has been adequately addressed a since flagging this. Looks like a dormant discussion on this 78.24.33.244 ( talk) 14:41, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Since no person has responded, can I suggest we delete the NPOV & COI Dispute templates? Waterpr8f ( talk) 11:45, 06 June 2019 (UTC)
I saw this on other pages on Wikipedia before: There are several companies/people blamed on Wikipedia that they are involved in the Daphne Galizia case. However, by now it is clear who the perpetrators were and those companies accused on Wikipedia have nothing to do with it. There are certainly other editors with more experience than me but I personally don't think that those blaming-paragraphs are correct. Can I suggest deleting them? Fisherman887 ( talk) 19:55, 04 February 2020 (UTC)
In my opinion, it is fair to have the discussions (pros- and cons) about the Maltese Individual Investor Programme under Criticism and Controversy but I agree, the connection to Daphne Galizia is outdated and misleading and the Shift News as a source might also be critical. Waterpr8f ( talk) 10:58, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
I have tagged this article {{ undisclosed paid}}; it has been heavily targeted by the GlobeClimber/KraYa sockfarm and suffers from promo issues. This is confirmed UPE, I can provide more detail to OTRS members on request. Blablubbs| talk 09:32, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. [see below] |
Hi, my name is Sarah and I work for Henley & Partners. I recently introduced myself to User:Blablubbs, who encouraged me to propose a redrafted, shorter version of this article to facilitate the removal of the "undisclosed paid" tag. My draft, which can be found at User:Sarah Nicklin/Henley & Partners, is heavily derived from this old revision from April 2018, which was just before the undisclosed paid editing began, as far as I understand. I made sure to leave in content that appears to have been added by legitimate editors.
I have several suggestions in mind for improving and expanding the article, but my first priority is to start over with a clean slate, and only then begin proposing changes here on the Talk page.
Pinging 15 and Blablubbs. Please take a look at the draft and let me know if you think it's a constructive first step in resolving the article's problems, or if it doesn't go far enough, or even if goes too far. Thank you, Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 10:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
The firm has also developed the annual Global Citizen Award, which consists of a USD 50,000 monetary prize.+ sources), given that it has received independent coverage and is hence due for inclusion.
Henley & Partners denied these allegations, confirming that Low was never a client and was specifically rejected as such in 2015.+ source), but replace "confirming" with "asserting" or similar. I'm happy that
Henley & Partners was criticized from time to time [...]was removed from the criticism section in your draft given that it is only loosely related. 15 ( talk) 10:31, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
In addition to advising private clients and governments, Kälin is a speaker and writer[15] who is regularly quoted in the international media.[16][17][18][19][20] Having coined the term ius doni as a stand-in for citizenship-by-investment, Kälin introduced the concept of ius doni into the contemporary legal and political theory of citizenship by providing the first comprehensive academic analysis of the subject.[21]in User:Sarah Nicklin/Henley & Partners § Notes and I'm happy for you to implement the changes (=copy over your draft article and replace the current version with it). It reads too promotional and the level of detail is unneeded, given that Kälin has his own article. There is also a possible sourcing issue with ius doni, which might be best discussed at Kälin's article. 15 ( talk) 22:00, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi Ethanbas, are there specific parts you suggest should be rewritten or trimmed from the article? I am afraid that the tags themselves are not very helpful to me without any further explanation, particularly given the recent rewrite. Best, 15 ( talk) 10:11, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
I'd like to request that the contents of the "Criticism and controversy" section be integrated into the History section, per WP:CSECTION.
Also, please remove the third paragraph (about The Shift News) entirely, as the two sources cited in the paragraph are both from The Shift News, which should not be considered a legitimate source of information about itself. (I also don't think the incident described here is noteworthy enough to merit inclusion in an encyclopedia article about the company, but that may be a moot point due to the improper sourcing.)
Pinging 15 - it would be great if you could weigh in here. Thanks, Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 13:31, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi, this is Sarah from Henley & Partners, here again to propose a few more changes to the article, specifically to the lead section and the History section.
Lead:
Please add the following as the second sentence of the article: "It is the largest investment migration consultancy in the world." The source is the Quartz article that is already cited later in the lead. (This sentence should probably be followed by a paragraph break, though one might legitimately disagree.)
History:
References
Skift
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).Pinging 15 once again - thank you for bearing with me here! Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 14:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
information on post-2015 developmentsto the History section, we can also add the following sentence: In February 2022, Henley & Partners, in partnership with Deep Knowledge Analytics, launched the Best Investment Migration Real Estate Index, an index that compares countries by how welcoming they are for people seeking a secondary residence or citizenship. [1] [2]
References
Henley & Partners advise an undercover journalist about Malta's golden passports" Times of Malta April 23,2021 [1]
Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. |
Hello, it's Sarah again, with a few more proposed changes and additions.
Later history
Publications
References
Pinging 15 - thanks in advance! Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 15:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Recently, this article was overhauled in a single edit with no edit summary and no Talk page discussion. Several very significant changes were made, including summarily replacing the primary description of the company in the lead, tossing out large chunks of well-sourced consensus-based content throughout the article and adding multiple paragraphs of WP:COATRACK content framed inappropriately as criticism of the article's subject.
The impetus for these changes appears to have been the recent publication of an investigative report by the OCCRP. While the OCCRP does have editorial control and other hallmarks of good journalism, most Wikipedia editors will surely agree that it is a biased and opinionated source (see the organization's own description of itself and its mission) and thus the content it produces should be given in-text attribution and appropriate counterbalance on Wikipedia - not used to effectively override other reliable sources and treated as the final word on the subject.
I would request that the edit in question be reverted (of course, I will not do so myself due to my conflict of interest) and the changes discussed here on the Talk page first. Pinging 15 and Snooganssnoogans as a courtesy. Thank you, Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 09:12, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
The merger proposal - I propose merging Henley Passport Index into Henley & Partners. I think the content in Henley Passport Index can easily be explained in the context of Henley & Partners, and a merger would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in Henley & Partners. The existence of the Henley Passport Index page is purely promotional. Thenightaway ( talk) 16:21, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
The merger proposal - I propose merging Quality of Nationality Index into Henley & Partners. I think the content in Quality of Nationality Index can easily be explained in the context of Henley & Partners, and a merger would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in Henley & Partners. The existence of the Quality of Nationality Index page is purely promotional. Thenightaway ( talk) 16:25, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
For all my edits on any other page, everything goes well. On this particular page, user:Thenightaway is always destroying my edits. I have already discussed on teahouse and wanted to post this here before taking it to WP:ANI. Such actions are definitely making me feel unsafe in this environment. I make sure that only key information with WP:RS sources are provided. I am politely requesting the community to help me with this. user:Thenightaway, I am also requesting you to participate in this discussion. You never replied to my discussion on Teahouse either. I am trying to understand why you only have a problem with my edits on this particular page. Although, my expertise lies in topics I have mentioned on my talk page, I only include important information and correct sources. ANLgrad ( talk) 16:42, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Based on the discussion on teahouse regarding building up of Publications section and consensus for the same, I am pasting the discussion link here for others to refer to - /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive_1171#Building_up_a_section ANLgrad ( talk) 15:56, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. |
Hi everyone. I'd like to propose restoring the "Impact" section, which was deleted several months ago along with most of its content, with the terse edit summary "these are not rs." The content of the section that was deleted (not including the sentence about the Global Citizen Award, which was partly preserved elsewhere in the article) is as follows:
The claim that the prominent Maltese news outlets Malta Today and The Malta Independent are "not rs" is baseless, and the content itself is pertinent, encyclopedic and WP:DUE, so I would ask that the section be restored.
In addition, the Impact section could reasonably be bolstered by other encyclopedic information, as follows:
References
Thank you, Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 13:16, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi everyone. There are two places where I've noticed the language is still misleading.
Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 09:20, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I’d like to start a discussion here on the current version of the article. It is very alarming that this page always seems to attract negative information in big chunks and positive/neutral information in minimal updates. There are tons of news stories which reflect Henley & Partners in a positive light, but don’t see its way on the page. There is no ownership of any sort, and therefore a neutral mix of edits should be allowed and tolerated on the page. Recently, a few lines with sources which were neutral and fact-based have been removed.
Removal of such content doesn’t seem to be appropriate and fair. I urge the Wikipedia community to check and add it back as this is unfair. In the Malta subsection, a huge piece of negative information has been added with undue weight to the English PEN statement along with a blockquote which is not required. In that case many positive blockquotes should be added too. This is done just to sabotage the page and if someone can be kind enough to correct this.
References
"supporting economic recovery, improving key macroeconomic balances and boosting bank liquidity"
National Development and Social Fund (NDSF). The fund receives 70 percent of its contributions from the country's citizenship program. These initiatives and projects are intended to develop and improve the economy, public services, and the general well-being of present and future generations.
Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 19:06, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi everyone, this is Sarah from Henley & Partners here again to propose a few more changes to the article. I'd like to propose fixing of the information that was recently added.
I am hoping other editors will pitch in here so we can get to a neutral version of the article. Pinging 15 and SMcCandlish to help please. Thank you.
References
Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 19:09, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
In May 2018 company representatives told a European Parliament delegation that was investigating the rule of law in Malta, "The point of the email was to ask the government if they would be ok with a legal action H&P was planning to take (which can have political repercussions)."
So it is clear to everyone, I am reproducing in full the paragraph in question from just before my first edit, and as a result of my last edit:
By SMcCandlish at 17:10, 21 June 2023:
In 2017, Henley colluded with top Maltese politicians to launch lawsuits against investigative journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia who was reporting on Henley's programs in Malta. Leaked email exchanges between top Henley officials (including CEO Christian Kalin), Malta prime minister Joseph Muscat, Justice Minister Owen Bonnici and Individual Investment Program CEO Jonathan Cardona discussing launching a SLAPP (Strategic lawsuit against public participation) lawsuit against Galizia that was intended to financially cripple her for her reporting.
By Xan747 at 22:38, 2 July 2023:
In May 2017, Maltese journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia accused Kälin of "collusion" with top Maltese politicians to threaten her and "three media houses" with lawsuits over their coverage of the company's activities in the country. She said that she had obtained leaked email exchanges between Kälin, Malta prime minister Joseph Muscat, Justice Minister Owen Bonnici and Individual Investment Program CEO Jonathan Cardona wherein they planned to send threats of filing "financially ruinous and extremely cumbersome" SLAPP (Strategic lawsuit against public participation) lawsuits in UK courts. She said that the emails also discussed sending legal threats to opposition MP Jason Azzopardi, but that a decision was ultimately made to focus the threats solely on herself. In May 2018 company representatives told a European Parliament delegation that was investigating the rule of law in Malta, "The point of the email was to ask the government if they would be ok with a legal action H&P was planning to take (which can have political repercussions)." As of February 2023, no legal inquiries have been initiated against Henley or Kälin. In September 2020, her son, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Matthew Caruana Galizia, provided a court of inquiry with copies of her notes, some call logs, and the leaked emails. He testified that Henley had picked the UK for its "friendly libel laws" and because it wanted a "sympathetic judge".
Italics added to highlight addition of material defending Henley's actions. Now to address the concerns in your original edit request:
You later requested to change "conspire" to "discussed" because, according to you, that's the term RS used. SMcCandlish argued that RS need not use a term for Wikipedia editors to use it, and their edit changed "conspired" to "colluded", using Wikipedia's voice. I personally feel that such a loaded term should not be done in Wikivoice, but clearly attributed inline to source(s). I found that colluded is the term Carunana Galizia used, so I changed the first sentence of the paragraph to put the collusion allegation into her voice. This is entirely proper and consistent with Wikipedia policy--but it did make the sentence wordier than it had been before.
That brings us to the overall length of the Malta section. There were not "multiple editors who agreed on truncating it as per WP:PROPORTION", there was one: Brenthaven, and their main truncating edits were the PEN blockquote and the assassination mention, neither of which I undid because I agree with them. The only other editor who expressed that the section could be shorter was SMcCandlish, "simply as a matter of article length", not PROPORTION. I don't think the article is too long.
In sum, I dispute that my edits "brought the part back to square one thus ruining efforts of multiple editors who were addressing this issue." I added information in defense of your firm in almost equal proportion to information critical of it. That did have the overall effect of increasing the size of the Malta section, but hardly undid the efforts of other editors.
Reviewing my edit, there is some fat that can be trimmed on the basis of wordiness and extraneous information, and I will get to work on that when I'm done with this note. But I think the substance of my edits gave additional necessary context to the episode that are not only reliably-sourced, but entirely WP:DUE.
Regards, Xan747 ( talk) 20:18, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
your statement that there were no multiple editors who agreed to truncate the verbiage is incorrect.
"multiple editors who agreed on truncating it as per WP:PROPORTION"
In 2017, Henley conspired with top Maltese politicians to launch lawsuits against investigative journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia who was reporting on Henley's programs in Malta. Leaked email exchanges between top Henley officials (including CEO Christian Kalin), Malta prime minister Joseph Muscat, Justice Minister Owen Bonnici and Individual Investment Program CEO Jonathan Cardona discussing launching a SLAPP (Strategic lawsuit against public participation) lawsuit against Galizia that was intended to financially cripple her for her reporting. She was assassinated later that year.
The human rights organization English PEN released a public statement on 1 May 2018 about Caruana Galizia and Henley:
Prime Minister Joseph Muscat is also pursuing a libel case against Caruana Galizia's son Matthew Caruana Galizia. The Shift News, an independent media outlet launched after Caruana Galizia's assassination which has pursued a number of her stories, is currently facing the threat of a financially crippling SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) from the Jersey-based firm Henley & Partners, who had taken legal proceedings against Daphne Caruana Galizia prior to her death. PEN is seriously concerned about the fact that senior government officials including Prime Minister Joseph Muscat are insisting on trying 34 libel cases against Daphne Caruana Galizia, which have now been assumed by her family. PEN believes that these proceedings are in direct reprisal for her work in investigating corruption within the current Maltese government.
In May 2017, Maltese journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia accused Kälin of "collusion" with top Maltese politicians to sue her and "three media houses" over their coverage, and also opposition MP Jason Azzopardi. She published leaked email exchanges between Kälin, Malta prime minister Joseph Muscat, Justice Minister Owen Bonnici and IIP CEO Jonathan Cardona planning threats of "financially ruinous" SLAPP lawsuits in UK courts. In September 2020, her son, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Matthew Caruana Galizia, gave a Maltese court of inquiry her notes, call logs, and the leaked emails. He testified the UK was chosen for its "friendly libel laws" and desire for a "sympathetic judge".
In May 2018, English PEN and The Guardian reported that Henley had threatened to sue Malta-based The Shift News, which continued many of Caruana Galizia's investigations after her death, including her reporting on Henley.
In 2017, Henley colluded with top Maltese politicians to launch lawsuits against investigative journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia who was reporting on Henley's programs in Malta. Leaked email exchanges between top Henley officials (including CEO Christian Kalin), Malta prime minister Joseph Muscat, Justice Minister Owen Bonnici and Individual Investment Program CEO Jonathan Cardona discussing launching a SLAPP (Strategic lawsuit against public participation) lawsuit against Galizia that was intended to financially cripple her for her reporting.
On 1 May 2018, the human rights organization English PEN released a public statement about concerns around the libels cases, from senior government officials of Malta and Henley & Partners, faced by Caruana Galizia’s family and The Shift News, an independent media outlet.
In May 2018 company representatives told a European Parliament delegation that was investigating the rule of law in Malta, "The point of the email was to ask the government if they would be ok with a legal action H&P was planning to take (which can have political repercussions). As a concessionaire of the IIP programme, we wanted to inform the government. We would not go ahead with something like that unless we got at least an informal 'OK' of the key decision makers." As of February 2023, no legal inquiries have been initiated against Henley or Kälin.
Also, a few lines with sources which were neutral and fact-based have been removed. Please restore them as they were factually correct, appropriate and sourced.I think I know which ones you're talking about, and am inclined to restore them, but you need to specify exactly what text you wish to have added back.
“It disgusts me. Henley and Partners is a hacker firm. It targets states where institutions are fragile to expand its business,” says Matthew Caruana Galizia. A Pulitzer Prize winner, he is the son of Daphne Caruana Galizia, a famous investigative journalist who long investigated golden passports before she was murdered in 2017.
According to him, the passport sales program has generated an unhealthy climate and suspicions of corruption. "The institutions have been weakened by the collusion between Christian Kälin and the political world in Malta", he denounces. After the murder of Daphne Caruana Galizia, several Maltese politicians had to resign. Neither Henley and Partners nor Christian Kälin have been the subject of legal inquiries.
As of February 2023, no legal inquiries have been initiated against Henley or Kälin.
In May 2018, English PEN and The Guardian reported that Henley had threatened to sue Malta-based The Shift News, which continued many of Caruana Galizia's investigations after her death, including her reporting on Henley.I think stating it this way makes it more clear that new threats of litigation were issued against other parties after her death. Xan747 ( talk) 20:41, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
In place of "colluded" in a phrase like "In 2017, Henley colluded with top Maltese politicians to launch lawsuits against investigative journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia", we could probably use "cooperated" in Wikipedia's own voice, which has no negative connotation. But there is certainly nothing wrong with a direct quotation (as long as the translation is accurate, if English was not the original language used and the quotations are appropriate under WP:DUE) like 'In May 2017, Maltese journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia accused Kälin of "collusion" with top Maltese politicians to sue her', and "The institutions have been weakened by the collusion between Christian Kälin and the political world in Malta". We're not going to censor use of "collude" in original source material. Not sure I've got anything else particular to advise, because I've not been following these edits in great detail. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 19:50, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
In May 2017, Maltese journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia accused Kälin and other Maltese politicians of collusion to sue her, opposition MP Jason Azzopardi and three media houses over their coverage.
I have in my possession evidence, in the form of email exchanges between the addressees of this message, that Henley & Partners' threat/decision to sue me in the UK courts was taken on instruction from, and in collusion with you, the Prime Minister, Joseph Muscat, his chief of staff, Keith Schembri, and the Justice Minister, Owen Bonnici.The same source also uses the word "colluded" in its own voice, in the lede.
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi everyone, this is Sarah and I'd like to propose a minor addition on the Company infobox to include two fields, Industry and Services. The current version does not include these two fields and are easily available on the company's website and media for the purpose of verification.
Add
Company type | Private |
---|---|
Industry | Consultancy |
Founded | 1997 |
Headquarters | |
Area served | Worldwide |
Key people |
|
Services | Residence-by-investment, Citizenship-by-investment and Real estate advisory |
References
Thanks in advance! Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 15:38, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Edit request implemented Spintendo 18:11, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
I have restored content that was deleted by @ Thenightaway an editor that has displayed sustained negative editorial bias on the page WP:TENDENTIOUS. Constant disruptive editing and possible vandalism. Well referenced neutral content should not be removed again without an explanation on the talk page. ANLgrad ( talk) 22:44, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi Thenightaway, this is regarding your recent edits on the page.
Can you help understand why you have removed WP:RS referenced content from the lead paragraph "despite economic benefits to both the countries"? This line was WP:NPOV neutral and cited.
This WP:RS referenced content that you have removed required an explanation in the edit summary. Can you help understand why you have not left an appropriate edit summary for this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Henley_%26_Partners&diff=prev&oldid=1190101836 I would like to direct you to this page for better understanding of edit summaries WP:SUMMARYNO and WP:EDITSUMCITE
Also you have added contested content back to the page without a consensus. Disputed content should not be added back on the page without a discussion and consensus. I encourage you to understand other editor's perspectives also. I'd like to point you to the contested edits here https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Henley_%26_Partners&diff=prev&oldid=1187863893
ANLgrad ( talk) 00:31, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Based on the discussion on teahouse regarding addition of a line for neutrality - /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive_1213#Showing_both_sides_of_the_picture_for_neutrality
Current text in the lead paragraph - It has been criticised for its core business model, which detractors believe to threaten the fight against cross-border corruption and crime. Henley's immigrant investor programs in Malta and in St. Kitts and Nevis have stirred controversy.
To fairly present the overall impact and for neutrality, the text above could be updated to read as follows-
It has been criticised for its core business model, which detractors believe to threaten the fight against cross-border corruption and crime. Henley's immigrant investor programs in Malta and in St. Kitts and Nevis have stirred controversy. According to a report by the International Monetary Fund, the program has helped St. Kitts and Nevis come out of a four-year recession.
As in WP:RS citation source - https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/st-kitts-and-nevis-citizenship
Viewpoints from teahouse
Remsense - I think this is likely a good start. Talk page discussion will likely further nuance how the points are presented.
ANLgrad ( talk) 00:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
Hi, this is Sarah from H&P. I am proposing one addition along with references.
Please add a new subsection 'Antigua & Barbuda' under the 'History' section after 'St. Kitts and Nevis' subsection for chronological arrangement.
In 2012, Henley & Partners designed Antigua and Barbuda’s Citizenship-by-Investment Programme (CIP) under a government mandate. Through the programme, the country received investments in several sectors which reduced dependency on traditional industries like tourism. [1] [2]
References
Thanks in advance!
Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 10:06, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
@ Buidhe: thanks for weighing in here and I understand your point about the second line and the second source. Can you kindly add the first line and the first source.
In 2012, Henley & Partners designed Antigua and Barbuda’s Citizenship-by-Investment Programme (CIP) under a government mandate. [1]
Thanks in advance!
Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 07:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
The user below has a request that an edit be made to
Henley & Partners. That user has an
actual or apparent
conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is high. Please be very patient. There are currently 168 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
Hi, this is Sarah again from H&P. I am proposing a one line addition along with reference from a reputed newspaper.
Please add a new subsection 'Antigua & Barbuda' under the 'History' section after 'St. Kitts and Nevis' subsection for chronological arrangement.
In 2012, Henley & Partners designed Antigua and Barbuda’s Citizenship-by-Investment Programme (CIP) under a government mandate. [2]
References
Thanks in advance!
Sarah Nicklin ( talk) 07:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)