I have used these (amongst a few others) in Indonesia articles...
-- Merbabu ( talk) 05:41, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Please read this warning. Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 22:16, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Please forget about my previous deleted message okay, peace out! ( Toby323) ( talk)
Is "Recognised" suitable to describe English on the info-box in regards to this Section 2 of Article 82 on the Country's Constitution?
Article 82
Section 2 - An official version in the English language shall be provided of anything which, by this Constitution or by any written law or by the Standing Orders, is required to be printed or in writing, and such version shall, in addition to the official Malay version, be accepted as an authentic text. Alevero987 ( talk) 18:21, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
complication is exactly why there needs to be a link to that other page. Change the text if you want but leave the link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soaringbear ( talk • contribs) 18:52, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
I have added a reliable source i.e.,pew research center and I states that 99% are Sunni Muslims. Read it before making any reverts. http://www.pewforum.org/2011/01/27/future-of-the-global-muslim-population-sunni-and-shia/. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Septate ( talk • contribs) 16:26, 10 April 2014 (UTC) Read the whole article.
Hello User:Chipmunkdavis. You removed my tags on the East Timor article as being disruptive. I do think there is a citation needed because the source now given is a working document of a UN commission and not a document by the Timorese authorities. The document now cited doesn't establish facts on names of countries in official use by these countries persé, specially not when there are conflicting translations in use in other places. Like the constitution of the country in it's English translation. I will not challenge your revert however but I'd be happy to restore, for the time, the source I initially removed as failing, when I got involved in the situation yesterday evening. Thus restoring the source that was there, while not taking away anything that was added since. This for more clarity in the discussion that is bound to follow. Gerard von Hebel ( talk) 19:58, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
This has been long overdue so I am starting work on the Singapore lead. I have set up a talk page section for discussion. Talk:Singapore#POV_and_WP:UNDUE_in_lead. I would appreciate if you could help out. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 05:29, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Chipmunkdavis, I have just seen your bold edits, which is fine. Generally, I would agree with half of your removal but will revert/copy-edit others later or next two days, especially those which are sourced. Hope to avoid an edit-war and discuss on the Talk page. I would prefer that you state your stance since too much has gone on in the last few weeks. Is it fine with you? Wrigleygum ( talk) 14:14, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
"There is broad though not unanimous consensus that the lead needs to be trimmed, and that the statistics are overdone". What to trim? It will be by Consensus correct? Does trimming refer to just the stats or everything? One editor does not determine that. She bold-removed paragraph-5 with the edit summary "Unsourced boosterism", and my reply in Talk is "..all the statements are sourced in body content - widely acknowledged, not boosterism." - Wrigleygum ( talk) 16:18, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Chipmunkdavis! I've recently opened a discussion on Singapore Talk-page if you'd like to join, you could. Kinda regards. -- Luigi Boy ルアイヂ ボイ talk 12:25, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
I'm wondering if you are interesting in reviewing the article on Kingdom of Singapura as you have contributed to articles on Singapore before, also the issue is related to the founding of Malacca Sultanate, therefore indirectly connected to Malaysian History. I'm currently inviting reviews for the article - Wikipedia:Peer review/Kingdom of Singapura/archive1. The reason is mainly because I believe it needs to be overhauled, but it may not be easy because of the extensive amount that's written already, therefore I would like suggestions (or even edits) that can improve it. The main problem is the uncertainty in the history and what appears to be skewing of the narrative (some points raised in Talk:Kingdom of Singapura). Historians believe that many of the kings may be mythical, but the article is written in a way that is skewed towards the view that they are real. Suggestions or edits would be welcome. Hzh ( talk) 16:26, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Singapore, an article you have significantly edited, has been nominated for Good Article. It seems possible for it to become a Good Article, though it needs tidying up. If you are interested in helping out, see the review: Talk:Singapore/GA3. SilkTork ( talk) 16:12, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello, do you think it would be advisable to seek ECP for the Singapore page for perhaps a month? Considering that it has been targeted by Feiona socks endlessly, it is justified under ' abusive sockpuppetry'. A month long's ECP could act to deter the user and should he or she returns, extended accordingly. Seloloving ( talk) 11:29, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
You keep questioning about my view of WP:OWN on a discussion, So I show you the text which might help you understand. Hope you read this.
do you want to cover the history of Malay in Indonesia, the Malay tribe is native to Indonesia K mm aoak ( talk) 04:49, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
I cited a source. Singapore was kicked out of Malaysia, through action in the Malaysian government. So it was against their will. Do you own the article? I thought people didn't own articles on Wikipedia! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 747pilot ( talk • contribs) 02:59, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
I thought I would continue discussion of this topic on your talk page so that you don't need to keep an eye on mine.
I have in fact recently nominated a number of East Timor articles for DYK. The ones that have already appeared as DYKs are acknowledged on my talk page, and two more have recently been approved. I didn't nominate Tibar Bay, because I took too long to write it to my satisfaction. The German Wikipedia article about the history of Dili ( de:Geschichte Dilis) seems to be quite comprehensive, although I haven't looked at it very closely yet. I am able to translate German, but most German Wikipedia articles need significant improvement to comply with English Wikipedia expectations relating to referencing, etc.
More recently, I have added more content to National Stadium (East Timor), created Cape Fatucama, and upgraded Ombai Strait and Wetar Strait. The Stadium article needs some more refinement, but the basic factual material in it is already now pretty much all I have been able to find on the internet. I also intend to expand the two Strait articles further, and an improvement of Timorese Resistance Archive and Museum will be my next task. Bahnfrend ( talk) 10:17, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi CMD
Sorry for not replying yet to your request at my talk page... unfortunately my Wiki time has been dwindling considerably recently, and I'm about to go on vacation. So if you're still interested in my thoughts then, I can hopefully have a look at it in late April. I think your thoughts may be generally sensible from a very brief look. If you do decide to split out History into its own article, don't forget to leave a decent self-contained summary of appropriate length in the parent article. Its a bug-bear of mine when people just leave a section empty with a link to "main article", that's not how summary style is supposed to work, and why we have e.g. Rwanda#History and History of Rwanda as separate entities. Cheers — Amakuru ( talk) 17:46, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi CMD
If you're still interested in nominating something for DYK, you might want to consider Comoro River, which I started expanding on 6 April. A possible hook might be: "... the Berloi Waterfall forms part of a minor tributary of the Comoro River?" I intend to expand the river article a little bit further, by including some information to the effect that its lower reaches are flood prone. I will do that in the next day or so. Bahnfrend ( talk) 04:19, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I think you must see all official language of members of ASEAN. You can see all is putting ASEAN flag in their language example Thai language & Indonesian language article. If it wrong I think you also remove on their article Malayan Law ( talk) 05:49, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
The source same like what I do Malayan Law ( talk) 08:31, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
I have used these (amongst a few others) in Indonesia articles...
-- Merbabu ( talk) 05:41, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Please read this warning. Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 22:16, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Please forget about my previous deleted message okay, peace out! ( Toby323) ( talk)
Is "Recognised" suitable to describe English on the info-box in regards to this Section 2 of Article 82 on the Country's Constitution?
Article 82
Section 2 - An official version in the English language shall be provided of anything which, by this Constitution or by any written law or by the Standing Orders, is required to be printed or in writing, and such version shall, in addition to the official Malay version, be accepted as an authentic text. Alevero987 ( talk) 18:21, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
complication is exactly why there needs to be a link to that other page. Change the text if you want but leave the link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soaringbear ( talk • contribs) 18:52, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
I have added a reliable source i.e.,pew research center and I states that 99% are Sunni Muslims. Read it before making any reverts. http://www.pewforum.org/2011/01/27/future-of-the-global-muslim-population-sunni-and-shia/. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Septate ( talk • contribs) 16:26, 10 April 2014 (UTC) Read the whole article.
Hello User:Chipmunkdavis. You removed my tags on the East Timor article as being disruptive. I do think there is a citation needed because the source now given is a working document of a UN commission and not a document by the Timorese authorities. The document now cited doesn't establish facts on names of countries in official use by these countries persé, specially not when there are conflicting translations in use in other places. Like the constitution of the country in it's English translation. I will not challenge your revert however but I'd be happy to restore, for the time, the source I initially removed as failing, when I got involved in the situation yesterday evening. Thus restoring the source that was there, while not taking away anything that was added since. This for more clarity in the discussion that is bound to follow. Gerard von Hebel ( talk) 19:58, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
This has been long overdue so I am starting work on the Singapore lead. I have set up a talk page section for discussion. Talk:Singapore#POV_and_WP:UNDUE_in_lead. I would appreciate if you could help out. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 05:29, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Chipmunkdavis, I have just seen your bold edits, which is fine. Generally, I would agree with half of your removal but will revert/copy-edit others later or next two days, especially those which are sourced. Hope to avoid an edit-war and discuss on the Talk page. I would prefer that you state your stance since too much has gone on in the last few weeks. Is it fine with you? Wrigleygum ( talk) 14:14, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
"There is broad though not unanimous consensus that the lead needs to be trimmed, and that the statistics are overdone". What to trim? It will be by Consensus correct? Does trimming refer to just the stats or everything? One editor does not determine that. She bold-removed paragraph-5 with the edit summary "Unsourced boosterism", and my reply in Talk is "..all the statements are sourced in body content - widely acknowledged, not boosterism." - Wrigleygum ( talk) 16:18, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Chipmunkdavis! I've recently opened a discussion on Singapore Talk-page if you'd like to join, you could. Kinda regards. -- Luigi Boy ルアイヂ ボイ talk 12:25, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
I'm wondering if you are interesting in reviewing the article on Kingdom of Singapura as you have contributed to articles on Singapore before, also the issue is related to the founding of Malacca Sultanate, therefore indirectly connected to Malaysian History. I'm currently inviting reviews for the article - Wikipedia:Peer review/Kingdom of Singapura/archive1. The reason is mainly because I believe it needs to be overhauled, but it may not be easy because of the extensive amount that's written already, therefore I would like suggestions (or even edits) that can improve it. The main problem is the uncertainty in the history and what appears to be skewing of the narrative (some points raised in Talk:Kingdom of Singapura). Historians believe that many of the kings may be mythical, but the article is written in a way that is skewed towards the view that they are real. Suggestions or edits would be welcome. Hzh ( talk) 16:26, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Singapore, an article you have significantly edited, has been nominated for Good Article. It seems possible for it to become a Good Article, though it needs tidying up. If you are interested in helping out, see the review: Talk:Singapore/GA3. SilkTork ( talk) 16:12, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello, do you think it would be advisable to seek ECP for the Singapore page for perhaps a month? Considering that it has been targeted by Feiona socks endlessly, it is justified under ' abusive sockpuppetry'. A month long's ECP could act to deter the user and should he or she returns, extended accordingly. Seloloving ( talk) 11:29, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
You keep questioning about my view of WP:OWN on a discussion, So I show you the text which might help you understand. Hope you read this.
do you want to cover the history of Malay in Indonesia, the Malay tribe is native to Indonesia K mm aoak ( talk) 04:49, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
I cited a source. Singapore was kicked out of Malaysia, through action in the Malaysian government. So it was against their will. Do you own the article? I thought people didn't own articles on Wikipedia! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 747pilot ( talk • contribs) 02:59, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
I thought I would continue discussion of this topic on your talk page so that you don't need to keep an eye on mine.
I have in fact recently nominated a number of East Timor articles for DYK. The ones that have already appeared as DYKs are acknowledged on my talk page, and two more have recently been approved. I didn't nominate Tibar Bay, because I took too long to write it to my satisfaction. The German Wikipedia article about the history of Dili ( de:Geschichte Dilis) seems to be quite comprehensive, although I haven't looked at it very closely yet. I am able to translate German, but most German Wikipedia articles need significant improvement to comply with English Wikipedia expectations relating to referencing, etc.
More recently, I have added more content to National Stadium (East Timor), created Cape Fatucama, and upgraded Ombai Strait and Wetar Strait. The Stadium article needs some more refinement, but the basic factual material in it is already now pretty much all I have been able to find on the internet. I also intend to expand the two Strait articles further, and an improvement of Timorese Resistance Archive and Museum will be my next task. Bahnfrend ( talk) 10:17, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi CMD
Sorry for not replying yet to your request at my talk page... unfortunately my Wiki time has been dwindling considerably recently, and I'm about to go on vacation. So if you're still interested in my thoughts then, I can hopefully have a look at it in late April. I think your thoughts may be generally sensible from a very brief look. If you do decide to split out History into its own article, don't forget to leave a decent self-contained summary of appropriate length in the parent article. Its a bug-bear of mine when people just leave a section empty with a link to "main article", that's not how summary style is supposed to work, and why we have e.g. Rwanda#History and History of Rwanda as separate entities. Cheers — Amakuru ( talk) 17:46, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi CMD
If you're still interested in nominating something for DYK, you might want to consider Comoro River, which I started expanding on 6 April. A possible hook might be: "... the Berloi Waterfall forms part of a minor tributary of the Comoro River?" I intend to expand the river article a little bit further, by including some information to the effect that its lower reaches are flood prone. I will do that in the next day or so. Bahnfrend ( talk) 04:19, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I think you must see all official language of members of ASEAN. You can see all is putting ASEAN flag in their language example Thai language & Indonesian language article. If it wrong I think you also remove on their article Malayan Law ( talk) 05:49, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
The source same like what I do Malayan Law ( talk) 08:31, 10 July 2022 (UTC)