Please explain why you reverted an edit I made to the Frederic Chopin page. In the section "In literature, stage, film and television", I added the appearance of George Chakiris, an Oscar-winning actor, as Frederic Chopin in the BBC television series Notorious Woman. I don't understand why Chakiris' performance was removed from a section that includes television. Thank you. EnglishTea4me ( talk)
I am importuning close colleagues to look in, if they are inclined, at the peer review for Arthur Sullivan. Ssilvers and I are planning to take the article to FAC, and if you are inclined to look in at the peer review and give us your comments, it will be esteemed a favour. – Tim riley talk 22:54, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Cassianto,
I'm writing to ask whether you would consider having a look at the article. I'm aware that you've been significantly involved with PRs. I've given it a major rewrite and complete overhaul. I began working on the article late October when it looked like this and somehow ended up rewriting the whole thing and aiming for potentially FA. This isn't a process I've been through before, but I have been reading the reviews here in preparation, and am familiar with FAC demands. I would very much appreciate a fresh set of eyes and happily address any concerns you may have.
Thanks! Pseud 14 ( talk) 08:31, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
I blocked the IP that was hassling you but did you also want semi-protection on your page for a bit? ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 09:12, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font>
tags, which are causing
Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.
You are encouraged to change
'''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px Black;">[[User:Cassianto|<font face="Papyrus">Cassianto</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cassianto#top|<font face="Papyrus">Talk</font>]]</sup></span>'''
:
Cassianto
Talkto
'''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px Black;">[[User:Cassianto|<span style="font-family: Papyrus;">Cassianto</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cassianto#top|<span style="font-family: Papyrus;">Talk</span>]]</sup></span>'''
:
Cassianto
TalkRespectfully, Anomalocaris ( talk) 19:41, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Krimuk2.0, shall I tell you what is disappointing? It's having good faith advice rudely reverted and not being able to reply to it; so I'll do it here instead. If someone tells you to "fuck off", then take it as read that that is exactly what they want you to do. Whether the WP:CIVIL cretins at Wikipedia like it or not, it's the way humans interact with each other, or it certainly is around my neck of the woods. We are just as human behind a keyboard as we are in real life. If someone is rude to us in the street we don't go over a slap them with a template as in all reality, we'd probably slap them with a right hooker. So if you want to do neither, just tell them in a few succinct words so they get the message. More often than not, templating someone during a dispute is as bad as saying a naughty word. Cassianto Talk 18:27, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
The box wars are fueled by seemingly "nice", "polite" actions like "thanking" someone.
Nicely matched. Saturday's skirmish. We hope ( talk) 12:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
What a fake. You know the frequent infobox discussions are disruptive Gerda and here you are encouraging it. Clearly you have no respect for others. Worming around behind the scenes is worse in my book than if you commented in the discussions yourself.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:11, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Why do edits which encourage more time wasting and bickering deserving of thanks Gerda?♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:35, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
"What about the option to let an infobox stand, without wasting time of arguing (why call that "bickering"?), for the readers' sake?" Because we've had the same argument at least half a dozen times on the same article and it always results in unpleasantries. Encouraging further discussion is disruptive unless you think that every single article on Wikipedia should have an infobox like some sort of uniform and think that more important that pointless recurring arguments.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:05, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
For the use of the place | |
This bunch says thanks and we'll remember to sweep up after ourselves! ;) We hope ( talk) 15:31, 11 December 2017 (UTC) |
taken here We hope ( talk) 16:17, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi there! On a FAN of the article above ( /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Unlocked_(Alexandra_Stan_album)/archive5 ), you complained about "the article [being] still in two minds with regards to whether it wants to be in AmEng and BrEng". Would you have time to work with me to rectify such issues, as I would want to bring the article up to FAN soon. Best regards and thanks; Cartoon network freak ( talk) 21:34, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Seasonal Greetings and Good Wishes | ||
Seasonal greetings for 2017, and best wishes for 2018. Heartfelt thanks to you for your contributions, which have done much to enhance the encyclopedia and make me feel it's worthwhile to keep contributing. So here's to another year's productive editing, with old feuds put aside and peace, goodwill and friendship for all! Brianboulton ( talk) 23:39, 14 December 2017 (UTC) |
We wish you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year 2018! | |
Wishing you and yours a Merry Christmas, and a Happy, Glorious, Prosperous New Year! God bless! — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 10:37, 22 December 2017 (UTC) |
Merry Christmas Cassianto!!
Hi Cassianto, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,
Thanks for all your help and contributions on the 'pedia!
,
–
Davey2010
Merry Xmas / Happy New Year
13:26, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 17:03, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Martinevans123
(Santa's Drop-in Centre) ... sends you ...
... warmest seasonal wishes for ......
Nadolig Llawen a Blwyddyn Newydd Dda.
Hoping that Christmas may bless you with
peace, love and understanding... and wishing that you have a good
run in 2018!!
Happy Holidays | |
From Stave one of Dickens
A Christmas Carol
So you see even Charles was looking for a reliable source :-) Thank you for your contributions to the 'pedia. ~ MarnetteD| Talk 00:32, 24 December 2017 (UTC) |
Season's greetings! | |
I hope this holiday season is festive and fulfilling and filled with love and kindness, and that 2018 will be safe, successful and rewarding... Modernist ( talk) 12:00, 24 December 2017 (UTC) (UTC) |
Since some things never change , here's a useful tool for you . We hope ( talk) 15:02, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello Cassianto,
Please consider not poking at the block-evading IP troll on their talk page. Far better, in my opinion, to ignore them. If vile behavior from that IP resumes after their block expires, I will happily block for longer.
Happy New Year! Cullen328 Let's discuss it 02:38, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Happy New Year! | |
A happy, healthy and peaceful 2018 to you! We hope ( talk) 00:31, 1 January 2018 (UTC) |
Belated Merry Christmas | |
For standing up against anti-own template,warriors. This also goes to Shrodo, another astute voice pleading into the void. Ceoil ( talk) 00:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC) |
Hi Cass, and a very warm happy new year to you. A few months ago you were kind enough to comment on the PR for the Aberfan disaster. After a slight delay to allow some of the images to become PD, the article is now at FAC. Any further comments would be most welcome. Cheers - SchroCat ( talk) 13:21, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
For future reference, I have found that e-mailing a friendly WP:Administrator to ask for this works really well, and avoids the Streisand effect. Cheers. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 12:21, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Cassianto, I was wondering if I can ask for your help/or just tips in drafting a infobox criteria (that needs to be followed prior to any comment about including/not including infobox), similar to your input at Talk:Michael Hordern. As you mentioned, if gaming "consensus can change" is a problem, I was thinking perhaps having a streamlined prerequisite in WP:INFOBOX might be a good place to start to reduce future time sink. Best, Alex Shih ( talk) 07:17, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
May all your endeavours have a fruitful beginning and prosperous ending! — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 12:21, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Just curious, why'd you delete my notification about responding to your post on the Cary Grant discussion? Banaticus ( talk) 16:57, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
I can't force you to discuss on your talk page, it is yours to delete from. But I do want to state my opinion. And yet not edit-war. So, unfortunately, There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. GRuban ( talk) 19:52, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
"following user edits"—which, when done in the circumstances in which you're doing it, is an explicit breach of Wikipedia policy—is unwanted, I won't hesitate to take you to ANI, Arbcom, or block outright as appropriate if I see you harassing any of them again. If you want to make this official I can give a {{ Uw-harass4im}} on your talkpage, but you've been here long enough that I'd expect you to know a basic policy like WP:HARASS without having it explained to you. ‑ Iridescent 21:25, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to end the Mary Shelley infobox request please. I have decided that it is not needed there and even if it was. We will get no where with the lack of consensus. Thank you and have a nice weekend. In Memoriam A.H.H. ( talk) 20:03, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The Tin Foil Hat Award | |
For being attacked by people wearing them. :-D We hope ( talk) 01:43, 24 January 2018 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Johnson (1807–1878), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Camden ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:20, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Theatres designed by Frank Matcham, Cassianto!
Wikipedia editor TheLongTone just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
What a pleasure to come across this article while new page reviwing. I used to work in the theatre, and I much regret the fact that there are no specialised theatre architectsa anymore. IMO the 'theatre consultants' who now work with the architects make a pigs ear of things. The fouled up the Hackney empire by pissing around with the rake, ignorant of the fact that Matcham knew his craft better than they do.
To reply, leave a comment on TheLongTone's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
TheLongTone ( talk) 15:22, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
As you consistently apply high quality content to biographies, I would like you to take a look at this image removal and its explanation. I am unsure what is meant by "images should not look off the page" and I hope that you could provide some guidance. Many thanks in advance! Scr★pIron IV 17:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of John Johnson (1807-1878) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Philafrenzy ( talk) 18:16, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The Civility Barnstar | |
For all the baiting and trolling and outright liars you've faced on such a regular basis, there are very few who would have put up with what you've had to. Most of those attacking you at the moment do so from the safety of the mob, but none have been as productive as you, and most wouldn't be able to be as beneficial to the project as you have been. Cheers – SchroCat ( talk) 21:18, 26 January 2018 (UTC) |
The Purple Barnstar | ||
You've suffered at the hands of "twats and knobheads and fuck-knuckles and wankers". Stay you. The Rambling Man ( talk) 21:45, 26 January 2018 (UTC) |
The Special Barnstar | |
This place is going downhill rather quickly and it doesn't seem like it's getting any better!, I recall seeing a discussion somewhere about how we're losing our valuable content creators ..... no fucking wonder! - The community is aparently getting rid of everyone one by one and soon there won't be any fucker left on here!, Anyway thank you for all of the wonder articles you've created and thank you for your contributions here, Don't let the bastards win!, Take care Cass. – Davey2010 Talk 22:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC) |
The Writer's Barnstar | |
For the excellent Michael Hordern article, especially the most interesting section about his experiences in WW2. Mr Ernie ( talk) 17:59, 31 January 2018 (UTC) |
You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions/Evidence. Please add your evidence by February 17, 2018, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 11:50, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
On 26 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Johnson (architect, born 1807), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John Johnson and Alfred Meeson designed the Alexandra Palace (pictured) in north London? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, John Johnson (architect, born 1807)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:02, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Cassianto, in the open Civility in infobox discussions arbitration case, a remedy or finding of fact has been proposed which relates to you. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 19:02, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
I thought it was rather petty of you to revert my edit on the Olivier page. This information is useful since it's something that often comes up. I could add more references if you feel one is not enough to make the information "reliable", but I feel WP is already drowning in references. Best wishes, Adrian Dadge ( talk) 00:11, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
I've opened up a discussion mentioning you here:
Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Edward_Colston
I think your OneClickArchiver might be setup incorrectly. When you last used it the archived went to 1 instead of the most recent. Just a heads up! PackMecEng ( talk) 17:52, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Please explain why you reverted an edit I made to the Frederic Chopin page. In the section "In literature, stage, film and television", I added the appearance of George Chakiris, an Oscar-winning actor, as Frederic Chopin in the BBC television series Notorious Woman. I don't understand why Chakiris' performance was removed from a section that includes television. Thank you. EnglishTea4me ( talk)
I am importuning close colleagues to look in, if they are inclined, at the peer review for Arthur Sullivan. Ssilvers and I are planning to take the article to FAC, and if you are inclined to look in at the peer review and give us your comments, it will be esteemed a favour. – Tim riley talk 22:54, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Cassianto,
I'm writing to ask whether you would consider having a look at the article. I'm aware that you've been significantly involved with PRs. I've given it a major rewrite and complete overhaul. I began working on the article late October when it looked like this and somehow ended up rewriting the whole thing and aiming for potentially FA. This isn't a process I've been through before, but I have been reading the reviews here in preparation, and am familiar with FAC demands. I would very much appreciate a fresh set of eyes and happily address any concerns you may have.
Thanks! Pseud 14 ( talk) 08:31, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
I blocked the IP that was hassling you but did you also want semi-protection on your page for a bit? ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 09:12, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font>
tags, which are causing
Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.
You are encouraged to change
'''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px Black;">[[User:Cassianto|<font face="Papyrus">Cassianto</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cassianto#top|<font face="Papyrus">Talk</font>]]</sup></span>'''
:
Cassianto
Talkto
'''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px Black;">[[User:Cassianto|<span style="font-family: Papyrus;">Cassianto</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cassianto#top|<span style="font-family: Papyrus;">Talk</span>]]</sup></span>'''
:
Cassianto
TalkRespectfully, Anomalocaris ( talk) 19:41, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Krimuk2.0, shall I tell you what is disappointing? It's having good faith advice rudely reverted and not being able to reply to it; so I'll do it here instead. If someone tells you to "fuck off", then take it as read that that is exactly what they want you to do. Whether the WP:CIVIL cretins at Wikipedia like it or not, it's the way humans interact with each other, or it certainly is around my neck of the woods. We are just as human behind a keyboard as we are in real life. If someone is rude to us in the street we don't go over a slap them with a template as in all reality, we'd probably slap them with a right hooker. So if you want to do neither, just tell them in a few succinct words so they get the message. More often than not, templating someone during a dispute is as bad as saying a naughty word. Cassianto Talk 18:27, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
The box wars are fueled by seemingly "nice", "polite" actions like "thanking" someone.
Nicely matched. Saturday's skirmish. We hope ( talk) 12:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
What a fake. You know the frequent infobox discussions are disruptive Gerda and here you are encouraging it. Clearly you have no respect for others. Worming around behind the scenes is worse in my book than if you commented in the discussions yourself.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:11, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Why do edits which encourage more time wasting and bickering deserving of thanks Gerda?♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:35, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
"What about the option to let an infobox stand, without wasting time of arguing (why call that "bickering"?), for the readers' sake?" Because we've had the same argument at least half a dozen times on the same article and it always results in unpleasantries. Encouraging further discussion is disruptive unless you think that every single article on Wikipedia should have an infobox like some sort of uniform and think that more important that pointless recurring arguments.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:05, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
For the use of the place | |
This bunch says thanks and we'll remember to sweep up after ourselves! ;) We hope ( talk) 15:31, 11 December 2017 (UTC) |
taken here We hope ( talk) 16:17, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi there! On a FAN of the article above ( /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Unlocked_(Alexandra_Stan_album)/archive5 ), you complained about "the article [being] still in two minds with regards to whether it wants to be in AmEng and BrEng". Would you have time to work with me to rectify such issues, as I would want to bring the article up to FAN soon. Best regards and thanks; Cartoon network freak ( talk) 21:34, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Seasonal Greetings and Good Wishes | ||
Seasonal greetings for 2017, and best wishes for 2018. Heartfelt thanks to you for your contributions, which have done much to enhance the encyclopedia and make me feel it's worthwhile to keep contributing. So here's to another year's productive editing, with old feuds put aside and peace, goodwill and friendship for all! Brianboulton ( talk) 23:39, 14 December 2017 (UTC) |
We wish you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year 2018! | |
Wishing you and yours a Merry Christmas, and a Happy, Glorious, Prosperous New Year! God bless! — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 10:37, 22 December 2017 (UTC) |
Merry Christmas Cassianto!!
Hi Cassianto, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,
Thanks for all your help and contributions on the 'pedia!
,
–
Davey2010
Merry Xmas / Happy New Year
13:26, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 17:03, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Martinevans123
(Santa's Drop-in Centre) ... sends you ...
... warmest seasonal wishes for ......
Nadolig Llawen a Blwyddyn Newydd Dda.
Hoping that Christmas may bless you with
peace, love and understanding... and wishing that you have a good
run in 2018!!
Happy Holidays | |
From Stave one of Dickens
A Christmas Carol
So you see even Charles was looking for a reliable source :-) Thank you for your contributions to the 'pedia. ~ MarnetteD| Talk 00:32, 24 December 2017 (UTC) |
Season's greetings! | |
I hope this holiday season is festive and fulfilling and filled with love and kindness, and that 2018 will be safe, successful and rewarding... Modernist ( talk) 12:00, 24 December 2017 (UTC) (UTC) |
Since some things never change , here's a useful tool for you . We hope ( talk) 15:02, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello Cassianto,
Please consider not poking at the block-evading IP troll on their talk page. Far better, in my opinion, to ignore them. If vile behavior from that IP resumes after their block expires, I will happily block for longer.
Happy New Year! Cullen328 Let's discuss it 02:38, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Happy New Year! | |
A happy, healthy and peaceful 2018 to you! We hope ( talk) 00:31, 1 January 2018 (UTC) |
Belated Merry Christmas | |
For standing up against anti-own template,warriors. This also goes to Shrodo, another astute voice pleading into the void. Ceoil ( talk) 00:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC) |
Hi Cass, and a very warm happy new year to you. A few months ago you were kind enough to comment on the PR for the Aberfan disaster. After a slight delay to allow some of the images to become PD, the article is now at FAC. Any further comments would be most welcome. Cheers - SchroCat ( talk) 13:21, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
For future reference, I have found that e-mailing a friendly WP:Administrator to ask for this works really well, and avoids the Streisand effect. Cheers. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 12:21, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Cassianto, I was wondering if I can ask for your help/or just tips in drafting a infobox criteria (that needs to be followed prior to any comment about including/not including infobox), similar to your input at Talk:Michael Hordern. As you mentioned, if gaming "consensus can change" is a problem, I was thinking perhaps having a streamlined prerequisite in WP:INFOBOX might be a good place to start to reduce future time sink. Best, Alex Shih ( talk) 07:17, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
May all your endeavours have a fruitful beginning and prosperous ending! — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 12:21, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Just curious, why'd you delete my notification about responding to your post on the Cary Grant discussion? Banaticus ( talk) 16:57, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
I can't force you to discuss on your talk page, it is yours to delete from. But I do want to state my opinion. And yet not edit-war. So, unfortunately, There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. GRuban ( talk) 19:52, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
"following user edits"—which, when done in the circumstances in which you're doing it, is an explicit breach of Wikipedia policy—is unwanted, I won't hesitate to take you to ANI, Arbcom, or block outright as appropriate if I see you harassing any of them again. If you want to make this official I can give a {{ Uw-harass4im}} on your talkpage, but you've been here long enough that I'd expect you to know a basic policy like WP:HARASS without having it explained to you. ‑ Iridescent 21:25, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to end the Mary Shelley infobox request please. I have decided that it is not needed there and even if it was. We will get no where with the lack of consensus. Thank you and have a nice weekend. In Memoriam A.H.H. ( talk) 20:03, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The Tin Foil Hat Award | |
For being attacked by people wearing them. :-D We hope ( talk) 01:43, 24 January 2018 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Johnson (1807–1878), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Camden ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:20, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Theatres designed by Frank Matcham, Cassianto!
Wikipedia editor TheLongTone just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
What a pleasure to come across this article while new page reviwing. I used to work in the theatre, and I much regret the fact that there are no specialised theatre architectsa anymore. IMO the 'theatre consultants' who now work with the architects make a pigs ear of things. The fouled up the Hackney empire by pissing around with the rake, ignorant of the fact that Matcham knew his craft better than they do.
To reply, leave a comment on TheLongTone's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
TheLongTone ( talk) 15:22, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
As you consistently apply high quality content to biographies, I would like you to take a look at this image removal and its explanation. I am unsure what is meant by "images should not look off the page" and I hope that you could provide some guidance. Many thanks in advance! Scr★pIron IV 17:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of John Johnson (1807-1878) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Philafrenzy ( talk) 18:16, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The Civility Barnstar | |
For all the baiting and trolling and outright liars you've faced on such a regular basis, there are very few who would have put up with what you've had to. Most of those attacking you at the moment do so from the safety of the mob, but none have been as productive as you, and most wouldn't be able to be as beneficial to the project as you have been. Cheers – SchroCat ( talk) 21:18, 26 January 2018 (UTC) |
The Purple Barnstar | ||
You've suffered at the hands of "twats and knobheads and fuck-knuckles and wankers". Stay you. The Rambling Man ( talk) 21:45, 26 January 2018 (UTC) |
The Special Barnstar | |
This place is going downhill rather quickly and it doesn't seem like it's getting any better!, I recall seeing a discussion somewhere about how we're losing our valuable content creators ..... no fucking wonder! - The community is aparently getting rid of everyone one by one and soon there won't be any fucker left on here!, Anyway thank you for all of the wonder articles you've created and thank you for your contributions here, Don't let the bastards win!, Take care Cass. – Davey2010 Talk 22:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC) |
The Writer's Barnstar | |
For the excellent Michael Hordern article, especially the most interesting section about his experiences in WW2. Mr Ernie ( talk) 17:59, 31 January 2018 (UTC) |
You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions/Evidence. Please add your evidence by February 17, 2018, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 11:50, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
On 26 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Johnson (architect, born 1807), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John Johnson and Alfred Meeson designed the Alexandra Palace (pictured) in north London? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, John Johnson (architect, born 1807)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:02, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Cassianto, in the open Civility in infobox discussions arbitration case, a remedy or finding of fact has been proposed which relates to you. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 19:02, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
I thought it was rather petty of you to revert my edit on the Olivier page. This information is useful since it's something that often comes up. I could add more references if you feel one is not enough to make the information "reliable", but I feel WP is already drowning in references. Best wishes, Adrian Dadge ( talk) 00:11, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
I've opened up a discussion mentioning you here:
Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Edward_Colston
I think your OneClickArchiver might be setup incorrectly. When you last used it the archived went to 1 instead of the most recent. Just a heads up! PackMecEng ( talk) 17:52, 15 September 2020 (UTC)