This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
email me? Dougweller ( talk) 19:05, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
On 3 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article When We Die As Martyrs, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the song " When We Die As Martyrs" is performed by the Arab children's choir Birds of Paradise? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers ( talk) 14:49, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
See - asad ( talk) 17:07, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Brewcrewer! A bit late to notify, but I did what you requested, and completely agree that the name Bilu'im was unjustified. Cheers, Ynhockey ( Talk) 19:25, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
I proposed an article for deletion and am having my contributions attacked without having my reasoning addressed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Markvs88#My_deletion_tag_was_not_.22spurious.22 If others agree it shouldn't be deleted, ok, but I don't see why I deserve to be attacked and to have someone cast aspersions on my contributions. 74.108.181.97 ( talk) 01:46, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
He's complaining about me removing a delete tag he made as "spurious". It's much ado about his ego. Best, Markvs88 ( talk) 19:22, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Passionless ( talk) 04:37, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
As I posted on the talk page, your going to need a source when you make the claim that Hamas is firing missles at Israel. Passionless ( talk) 21:45, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
I suggest you self-revert before I report you for violating 1RR. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 00:53, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
As you seem like a reasonable i guy i suggest you take a look at this edit. [1] 208.115.203.14 ( talk) 14:58, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
You would be very kind fi you could take a look at this edit. [3] User:LibStar has been removing perfectley relevant and sourced content from Immigration and crime a number of times and some weeks ago he nominated it for deletion because it had "to little content" and covered "to few coutries". Link to is explanation for deletion: [4]. Greenleafr ( talk) 23:47, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
The edits you just performed are absolutely absurd. You essentially said you removed certain material in the lead because it was "cited" and they were "primary sources". So if that were truly the case and that was truly the reason why you removed it, then you would logically saw it better to keep the material and add the sources later on the the article. You also removed the part about Palestinians not having access to the site, but you didn't remove the part about Israelis not have access to the site? Can it get more blatantly POV than that. And BTW, on WP: LEAD it says determining the citations in the lead is something to be reached by consensus, something you DIDN'T do. - asad ( talk) 21:59, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
I am pleased to announce that I now have 100 talk page stalkers (though a smart ass or two will now unwatch me). [5] The 100th talk page stalker gets a nice barnstar as a prize if he or she reveals him/her-self to me (the emphasis of gender neutrality is surely one the attractions of this talk page).-- brew crewer (yada, yada) 01:50, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Maybe it was me since I saw you made that remark on my page. Could I get a bowl of porridge instead? A star will not put food on the table. GGdowney ( talk) 07:20, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Nope 2. Just didn't pay attention to the time when reading through your history. I guess I'll learn that lesson to keep track of the time printed after the messages. GGdowney ( talk) 08:10, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
No thanks. Closed means closed. And I think you would do well to actually read the 1RR restriction. It only applies to articles. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 06:46, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Noleander ( talk) 15:13, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Maybe I'm over-reacting, but I'd hoped the personal attacks would have stopped a while back. Here ya go. Sol ( talk) 19:00, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
I have asked you many times to come back to the discussion and stop making unilateral movements.
This is your last warning; the next time you move a page maliciously, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Passionless ( talk) 22:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Could you take a look at the recent twinkle reverts by User:This lousy T-shirt? It seems like the articles have lost quality after series of unexplained edits. [7] 188.120.234.45 ( talk) 04:35, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for creating Category:Łódź Ghetto]. I'd suggest you add it as the main category to Ghetto Litzmannstadt and transfer the categories from that article to the new main category. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 21:52, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Responded to your question at CFDS. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:41, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Are you planning to explain/justify labeling Falk as a member of a set of people when he says that he is not a member of that set on the talk page of the article so that others can chip in ? The sources you added are opinion pieces. It's a BLP. I assume you read Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Is_this_reasonable.3F and saw the quote. Sean.hoyland - talk 05:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
As a contributor to this article, you may be interested to know it has been nominated for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Page. Robofish ( talk) 01:49, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
I have opened an ANI thread about your edits to Richard A. Falk. [8] 71.141.88.54 ( talk) 11:44, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
email me? Dougweller ( talk) 19:05, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
On 3 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article When We Die As Martyrs, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the song " When We Die As Martyrs" is performed by the Arab children's choir Birds of Paradise? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers ( talk) 14:49, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
See - asad ( talk) 17:07, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Brewcrewer! A bit late to notify, but I did what you requested, and completely agree that the name Bilu'im was unjustified. Cheers, Ynhockey ( Talk) 19:25, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
I proposed an article for deletion and am having my contributions attacked without having my reasoning addressed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Markvs88#My_deletion_tag_was_not_.22spurious.22 If others agree it shouldn't be deleted, ok, but I don't see why I deserve to be attacked and to have someone cast aspersions on my contributions. 74.108.181.97 ( talk) 01:46, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
He's complaining about me removing a delete tag he made as "spurious". It's much ado about his ego. Best, Markvs88 ( talk) 19:22, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Passionless ( talk) 04:37, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
As I posted on the talk page, your going to need a source when you make the claim that Hamas is firing missles at Israel. Passionless ( talk) 21:45, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
I suggest you self-revert before I report you for violating 1RR. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 00:53, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
As you seem like a reasonable i guy i suggest you take a look at this edit. [1] 208.115.203.14 ( talk) 14:58, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
You would be very kind fi you could take a look at this edit. [3] User:LibStar has been removing perfectley relevant and sourced content from Immigration and crime a number of times and some weeks ago he nominated it for deletion because it had "to little content" and covered "to few coutries". Link to is explanation for deletion: [4]. Greenleafr ( talk) 23:47, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
The edits you just performed are absolutely absurd. You essentially said you removed certain material in the lead because it was "cited" and they were "primary sources". So if that were truly the case and that was truly the reason why you removed it, then you would logically saw it better to keep the material and add the sources later on the the article. You also removed the part about Palestinians not having access to the site, but you didn't remove the part about Israelis not have access to the site? Can it get more blatantly POV than that. And BTW, on WP: LEAD it says determining the citations in the lead is something to be reached by consensus, something you DIDN'T do. - asad ( talk) 21:59, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
I am pleased to announce that I now have 100 talk page stalkers (though a smart ass or two will now unwatch me). [5] The 100th talk page stalker gets a nice barnstar as a prize if he or she reveals him/her-self to me (the emphasis of gender neutrality is surely one the attractions of this talk page).-- brew crewer (yada, yada) 01:50, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Maybe it was me since I saw you made that remark on my page. Could I get a bowl of porridge instead? A star will not put food on the table. GGdowney ( talk) 07:20, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Nope 2. Just didn't pay attention to the time when reading through your history. I guess I'll learn that lesson to keep track of the time printed after the messages. GGdowney ( talk) 08:10, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
No thanks. Closed means closed. And I think you would do well to actually read the 1RR restriction. It only applies to articles. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 06:46, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Noleander ( talk) 15:13, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Maybe I'm over-reacting, but I'd hoped the personal attacks would have stopped a while back. Here ya go. Sol ( talk) 19:00, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
I have asked you many times to come back to the discussion and stop making unilateral movements.
This is your last warning; the next time you move a page maliciously, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Passionless ( talk) 22:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Could you take a look at the recent twinkle reverts by User:This lousy T-shirt? It seems like the articles have lost quality after series of unexplained edits. [7] 188.120.234.45 ( talk) 04:35, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for creating Category:Łódź Ghetto]. I'd suggest you add it as the main category to Ghetto Litzmannstadt and transfer the categories from that article to the new main category. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 21:52, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Responded to your question at CFDS. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:41, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Are you planning to explain/justify labeling Falk as a member of a set of people when he says that he is not a member of that set on the talk page of the article so that others can chip in ? The sources you added are opinion pieces. It's a BLP. I assume you read Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Is_this_reasonable.3F and saw the quote. Sean.hoyland - talk 05:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
As a contributor to this article, you may be interested to know it has been nominated for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Page. Robofish ( talk) 01:49, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
I have opened an ANI thread about your edits to Richard A. Falk. [8] 71.141.88.54 ( talk) 11:44, 30 January 2011 (UTC)