For the most part, they're not very informative, but they do help if some editor removes an image for a bad reason. Also, the image warning I just got was wrong -- there was nothing wrong with the poster image for 30 Days of Night, so I don't know why I got it. Thanks for the heads-up about that, though... maybe I'll consider usage down the road. — Erik ( talk • contrib) - 22:05, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Can someone please make this redirect for me, because I'm clueless about what the proper term is. TheBlazikenMaster ( talk) 09:15, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I want you just to know that I support the merge of the episodes. Maybe it's better if we create 3 articles, one for each season, instead of 1, so we keep as much information as possible but at the end we trim these huge plot descriptions. The vast majority contains only two lines of real-world information. If you go and do it, I'll support you. -- Magioladitis ( talk) 23:41, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
To be honest, and I know this will be sound really flippant, I just don't care. I already list my FAs on my userpage without being so egostistical to also include them in my userboxes or categorize myself as such. Alientraveller ( talk) 16:28, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
I agree that the article needs an image, but do you believe we can upload a better one other than a VHS/DVD cover? Best pic I could find was this. Please reply on your talk page, Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 18:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
The Minor Barnstar | ||
I award this Minor Barnstar to TheBlazikenMaster for your many constructive edits that go unnoticed. LAA Fan 19:46, 23 May 2008 (UTC) |
But I'm not done yet. I still have to put disclaimers to the talk pages. That will take a while. TheBlazikenMaster ( talk) 22:05, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey, do you think you could keep an eye on the articles for me? You do a great job already, but I'm heading off on a Wikibreak shortly, and I was wondering if you could keep an eye on them for me when I'm away? Cheers. Qst ( talk) 17:47, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Look, if you're going to complain about the "encyclopedic format" then at least rewrite your sections so they're understandable instead of just taking out the bullets please? Because when I first looked at it, it looks like thats exactly what happened, which is why I put them back in. The entire cultural reference section on the page I edited is darn near the most kludged section I've seen in a while. I won't edit any more FG pages because I apparently don't do it right, but if you're so worried about that section being formatted like an encyclopedia then modify it so it is, please. Don't just do sentence after sentence after sentence that doesn't make sense in a paragraph like that. My $0.02. → ClarkCT Talk @ 04:29, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry for the belated response. I think I know what I do about movies because I've done a bit of research for Wikipedia articles. I haven't just found online articles that talk about films; I've used subscription-only databases to find coverage from newspapers, magazines, and journals. I've actually been reading some film journal articles since I want to write a pretty hefty "Critical analysis" section for Fight Club. I guess in my research, I just see trends like how a film's release is not guaranteed until it actually begins production. I've kept up with future films and seen how they collapse for a wide variety of reasons. — Erik ( talk • contrib) - 01:16, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
How have you been, anyway? See any good films? Did you ever put up these YouTube reviews and the transcripts? — Erik ( talk • contrib) - 18:28, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
I think this is not yet serious enough for such a hidden note. Lets first wait to see how persistent this person is. If he/she is a troll, such a note might only work
feedy. Perhaps s/he will eventually just give up, or decides to talk to the rest. If the edits continue however, such a note might indeed be a good idea, as the person is using dynamic IPs, and it might be the only way to warn him/her directly.
At least one of the ranges the person used is 90.202.89.* (see the contributions of
90.202.89.2,
90.202.89.104 and
90.202.89.178). The address
90.211.190.146 was also used by this person, and might be dynamic as well. Cheers,
Face
15:17, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry to contradict you twice in one day! Please feel free to tell me I'm wrong and totally retawded. / edg ☺ ☭ 16:24, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
{{HelpMe}}
Why are
those discussions still open?
TheBlazikenMaster (
talk)
15:42, 25 June 2008 (UTC)}}
I tried that but it didn't work! Besides, I wasn't even asking you! -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 18:15, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
I am calm. I just don't even know you. Not that that's a bad thing. I just was surprised you answered my question! -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 18:19, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Oh no please! You're free to talk to us! I'm always up for making new friends! Let's just forget about what happened earlier because we started off on kind of the wrong foot. Here, I'll start. Hi, my name is Soccer5525 and I'm a fellow Wikipedian of yours! -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 19:36, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Thankyou, I just have a lot of practice undertaking prose reviews at GA. I don't want to disparage Qst, s/he has found and properly referenced the sources, collected the information and formatted the page all to a high standard. They just have a little problem with writing coherently and neatly. I'm not adding anything new to the article, just organising what is there into a more defined order and brushing up the prose.-- Jackyd101 ( talk) 00:56, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Soccer5525 has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. {{subst:if||| {{{message}}} ||subst=subst:}} To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
-- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 14:59, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
No prob. I just thought it would be a nice gesture. Hope we can keep in touch still. :) -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 00:56, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Lool very funny [1]. -- SkyWalker ( talk) 06:31, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your sympathy. But I guess you misunderstood what we're talking about. The person that died was a dog. Did you think it was a person? -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 19:26, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Even so, it's nice to hear that you care. I'll be sure to tell my friend that even complete strangers on Wikipedia still care about her dog. -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 19:29, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi, it's me again. I was just wondering.......have I done anything that could be awarded a Barnstar from you? I mean, am I a nice person. I just haven't been awarded a Barnstar yet, and would like one. I know, I sound pathetic, but you don't have to reply to this if you don't want to.... -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 19:40, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
I don't mind. If you don't give me one, I won't give you one. That's fair. :) -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 19:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
I agree! Personally, I'd rather have a cookie than a star. Cookies taste better. :) -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 19:57, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Please sign my new autograph book! -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 13:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
It's on the bottom of my userpage! You can't miss it! -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 13:34, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Haha, I can hear, just can't make out all the words. Besides, I'm in the living room with people conked out on the sofas and floor. Link me to it, I'll watch it without audio. — Erik ( talk • contrib) - 12:50, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Any comments for [2]?-- SkyWalker ( talk) 05:17, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
My apologies, I did not realize there had been a discussion about that at WT:FT. Sorry about that. Cirt ( talk) 21:20, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
omg, you SO have to hear this! I showed my BFFL Leah one of your youtube videos yesterday, and she totally thinks you're hott! she adores your hair too! -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 14:15, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
BFFL = Best Friend For Life. -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 14:17, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
She would tell you this herslf, but she doesn't have a Wikipedia or a Youtube account. -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 14:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
You know, I've been notcing something. Every friend I have or every person I talk to on Wikipeida is a boy. Why is that? And also, I've only told Erik about this but, one time on Wikipedia, a guy I don't even know called me a, (please excuse my language...) "sex kitten". I won't disclose his name, for that could cause issues. Do know any girls that I could befriend on Wikipedia? -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 14:50, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Well, you know what I mean! I doubt that you're even the least bit manly in real life either! For example, you're interested in Pokemon. Now I don't mean to be rude but, don't you think Pokemon is a little babyish for you? I mean, how old are you? --
Soccer
5525
(Tk •
Ctrb)
15:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Nevermind, it says that you're 19 on your Wikipedia page. I'm 16, so we're close to the same age. -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 15:27, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
How could you like that word? It's terrible! -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 15:49, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for understanding. So anyway, what do you think about be BFFFL thinking you're hott? (I don't think you're cute, no offense!) -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 16:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
How is it nice of that guy to call me that? -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 16:56, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Oh. I thought you emant the other thing. And she's a she by the way. -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 17:38, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
why did you want to see if we had things in common? -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 15:34, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Please leave a little message where you signed on my guestbook. As you can see, everyone else did. -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 22:36, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Because "Nite" is the way it was originally spelled in Pokémon Gold, Silver, and Crystal. So we should preserve that spelling. Artichoker talk 15:32, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Chev Chelios, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. P4k ( talk) 00:28, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
I saw you editing. Are you back? Cheers, Face 21:20, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
That's no problem. How many pages do you have on your watchlist? I have 357, but a lot of them are red links that I keep just in case an editor creates an film article too early. — Erik ( talk • contrib) - 01:22, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Had something of a "brain fart" on that one but thanks for the tip. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oosh ( talk • contribs) 23:00, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Could I ask for your comment here, please? I asked ThinkBlue to leave the situation open to comment, and it would be nice to see it. Best, Qst ( talk) 13:13, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi Blaziken. Ehm... I don't know, but I tend to see a slight anger in your words at my talk page and here. Sorry if I, in any way, offended you. But don't you think my idea at least sounds nice? Let Bulbapedia have the lawyers! *chuckles* - Face 22:56, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
I wanna say to you one thing, in the article List of Family Guy voice actors i'm looking the actors in Spanish audio, the Family Guy in Spanish is dubbed in two versions Spanish (European) and Latino-American. But here only just writting in the Latino audio, could be better added the European dubbing. What do you say? -- Ravave ( talk) 20:29, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Who i speak then?. I say to you that could create a column apart, i direct to you because you are of the Family Guy WP and i want to suggest you this. I know how call them the Spanish actors names, if you want, i same add they names. -- Ravave ( talk) 20:43, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
"His name is face because he is the Face of what's relevant and what isn't on Wikipedia. (I hope you don't get offended by what I assumed, Face.)" [4]
So... what does this means? Cheers, Face 21:56, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
I asked you a question here, because I thought that you had this page in Watchlist. 2 days passed, you haven't answered, so I assume I was wrong and inform you about this question here. Hope you answer ;). If you answer my another 3 questions that I posted there, it will be great too ;) Quolav ( talk) 23:37, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
That's bad news! I think only Artichoker and me are currently watching the lists, but Artichoker has many other interests. Other patrollers help out now and then, but sometimes I feel I'm the only one in the watchtower; help is certainly appreciated. I understand your decision though. Patrolling gets boring quickly if you don't feel that what you do is sensible. But he, someone's gotta do it. Lately, I haven't been very active on WP, but soon I'll be doing the regular patrolling again. Thanks for your notification, and good luck with whatever you're going to do. See you around, Face 18:27, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Girolamo Savonarola ( talk) 06:41, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
I and have reopened the discussion here [ [5]]. Would you care to chime in? thanks. Smatprt ( talk) 01:02, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry about the merge proposing. It's just the only alternative I know to just losing the info outright. And I don't think you should quit the project if you feel that something at least *should* be done.-- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 01:49, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Girolamo Savonarola ( talk) 21:25, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
I was removing an edit made to insert a vandal edit summary. Thanks, NawlinWiki ( talk) 16:43, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Instead of northest, check out northernmost. That should do the trick. — CactusWriter | needles 15:25, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
I just wanted to make sure you were aware that we will still have an IMDb link in the "External links" section of film articles. It's just an additional click of "External links" in the table of contents to jump down and see IMDb and other links. — Erik ( talk • contrib) - 22:48, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks! ZenCopain ( talk) 00:17, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
for the most part I removed spaces from the article that were at the end of paragraphs with a semi-bot run tool. A State Of Trance ( talk) 14:43, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Blaziken Master. You can join our Wikipedia:Wikiproject SpongeBob SquarePants. - Porchcrop ( talk| contributions) 03:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Where is this discussion that you have already been through deleting that template? I'd like to take a look. Also, why would you even give your opinion if you are saying it can be discounted. CTJF83 Talk 15:29, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
{{help|No, I'm not leaving just yet, but I'm thinking about it. Could someone tell me the best place to say goodbye if I decide to leave?
TheBlazikenMaster (
talk)
01:20, 23 October 2008 (UTC)}}
Please stay, but you can say goodbye on your userpage.-- Res 2216 firestar 01:24, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Well I had a valid point if you look at WP:Notability that an article still has to illustrate why an article is notable and have a verifiable source. The first criteria is "significant coverage". Before PC edited the article earlier all it said was "...is a short film directed by George Lucas". If it had even said is a "30 minute film directed by George Lucas about Coppola's film this would have seemingly addressed the problem. A subject isn't inherently notable if it is devoid of any content whatsoever. The reason why I removed my comment is because I don't want to see another tiff with Giro over something trivial and somethign which was only used as an example of redundant content from an obviously "notable" director. Best Blofeld of SPECTRE ( talk) 12:42, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
I will be checking this back this weekend though, but that's it. TheBlazikenMaster ( talk) 12:15, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Yay, glad you're sticking around! I'm trying to understand the issues you've had on Wikipedia, though... can you give me some examples of what has bothered you? — Erik ( talk • contrib) 01:21, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
I think that it would be fun to watch, especially if you liked Casino Royale. I don't usually go to theaters unless the movies are worth watching on a big screen with other people, but I'll go for Quantum of Solace. Trailer looks great, but from what I've heard, it won't have quite as much of the 007 humor of previous films. It's okay by me, though, I like the gritty take. Not to mention the contemporary situation of a villain pretending to be "green" is just wicked cool. — Erik ( talk • contrib) 14:02, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
I need some serious help here, I don't wanna be the inventor of a ridiculous word. TheBlazikenMaster ( talk) 09:27, 29 October 2008 (UTC)}}
Man, that is a lot of pressure to make your Halloween great. Are you wanting a recommendation for a good Halloween film? I have to admit I am not a huge fan of horror in general, and I am not sure what you like. I think that The Descent is one of the best horror films I've seen; it has a very claustrophobic atmosphere. Beyond that, I'm not sure what else there is... I tend to prefer thriller films, which have less to do with jump-out-and-scare and more to do with tension. Two great examples that come to mind are The Silence of the Lambs and Seven, but be warned, they are very adult films. I hope my recommendations at least come in handy. By the way, the redirect seems fine to me. It's close enough, I think. — Erik ( talk • contrib) 11:57, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Perfectly understandable, Blaziken. All the best. -- Altiris Helios Exeunt 14:43, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Hey, hope you've been well! To be honest, I am not sure if either movie is worth seeing in theaters. I tend to rely on Rotten Tomatoes, which normalizes the rating. (Meaning that with a large enough sample, then additional reviews will not change the rating much.) Pride and Glory has 34%, and I am not sure if I will ever see it, even though I like Edward Norton. Body of Lies has 50%, a little weak, but it might be enjoyable to see in theaters with the big action scenes. I will probably see Body of Lies on DVD when it comes out, more because it's not captioned in theater near me. Cheers! — Erik ( talk • contrib) 20:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Check my user page to see why I'm planning on leaving. I made this section so all goodbyes will be kept at ONE place, and I will merge any new "goodbye" section to this place if more people wanna say goodbye. TheBlazikenMaster ( talk) 01:26, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
You wrote: "In case you don't remember me, we used to watch the Pokémon lists on Wikipedia. I will miss you. TheBlazikenMaster ( talk) 01:01, 29 November 2008 (UTC)"
So, does that mean you don't quit entirely? Are you semi-retired? Cheers, Face 12:15, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
It could be a fun movie if you like Adam Sandler; I enjoyed Click but passed on You Don't Mess With the Zohan. I probably will not pursue Bedtime Stories... there are some award contenders that I'd rather see, like The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. — Erik ( talk • contrib) 14:10, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Woman tits ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. – iridescent 22:44, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated !!!! ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you.
Control-alt-delete ★ user◾ talk◾ contrib◾ favs 22:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Bad Boys III. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad Boys III. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:04, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated The word fuck ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Glenfarclas ( talk) 01:53, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
If you're watching this page, I just wanna let you know that I'm back. But I'm not going to be involved in a lot of discussions, from now on I will mainly revert vandalism. I obviously had no idea what the hell I was doing most of the times. I have created many unnecessary redirects, been involved in many discussions without even knowing what I was talking about, I even nominated some things for deletion or something like that without even knowing what I was doing. To avoid doing stuff like that today, I will only be watching out for vandalism. I will try to stay away from discussions. TheBlazikenMaster ( talk) 16:34, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles ( talk) 18:01, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
But the reason I left in the first place was because I felt like I was causing nothing but trouble. How can I be on Wikipedia and not feel that way?
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their
user talk page. |
I for one don't care what you've done. Just don't do it again, and you'll always be welcome here. onyx 321 13:08, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
So I look forward to being back. TheBlazikenMaster ( talk) 08:19, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Abraham Lincoln, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Vrenator talk 12:17, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
I will be better and try to help the encyclopedia rather than hurting it. And I will treat everyone with respect. If I do something wrong feel free to point it out to me. TheBlazikenMaster ( talk) 12:51, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
So I was reading the article about reliable sources, and all I saw in that article is that reliable source is public knowledge. Now let me tell you something. All websites have their share of lies, and just because most people believe something to be true doesn't mean it is. In fact most people could believe in total bullshit. So my question is, how can I trust those so-called reliable sources in articles? The truth is I don't. For example, I don't believe for a second that John F. Kennedy was a fucking hero. Sure, he did great things for his country, but am I honestly supposed to believe he didn't do any harm? Yeah, I refuse to believe he was an all-good president and seriously think the media is overrating him. I know he was a nice guy, but nice does not mean good. I don't trust the articles on this site. That is why I am going to go to a bunch of talk pages and question them. So what I wanna know is, how can I trust a reliable source? That's something I have hard times figuring out. BlazeTheMovieFan ( talk) 21:08, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
We have a guideline that explains what Wikipedia means by reliable source, but clearly that's not what you're asking about, and your statement/question really isn't relevant to Wikipedia. If you're not interested in improving the encyclopedia, perhaps your return wasn't such a good idea after all. — DoRD ( talk) 21:33, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their
user talk page. |
Here for example I want someone to reply to the things I say. I'd love to use tags to bring awareness, but I'm worried that if I did that I'd look like an attention whore, and I don't want that. So what should I do when nobody replies to a message I post on a talk page? BlazeTheMovieFan ( talk) 20:14, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Come on over to Talk:Coca-Cola Schmidt,' MICHAEL Q. 04:10, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
You are too negative. Your initial edit summary was negative too!! Yes, some people try to delete notable content, others try to search for it and start it like myself!! Try to remember that for every deletionist there is somebody who works hard to build notable content/. We should have 10 articles on Icelandic newsreaders.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:49, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, a lot of articles and uneven coverage just sucks. But we can each make a difference to that.♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:09, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Shane Dawson. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Jeandré, 2012-01-07 t19:42z 19:42, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
You know, I'd much rather vandalize this site than helping it. Because I don't find it fun to make good edits, not to mention looking for reliable sources is boring. But I know I can only do that for less than 4 edits before I get banned, ah well. BlazeTheMovieFan ( talk) 17:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
I said that the reason why I'm not active on Wikipedia is because I don't trust the site. But to be honest, I now remember the reason why I love the site. Despite popular belief you can't put EVERYTHING on the site, and it has a strict policy on what qualifies as reliable source. So I will come back some day, for real. But not yet. BlazeTheMovieFan ( talk) 19:09, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect This century. Since you had some involvement with the This century redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 19:29, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Your account has been
blocked indefinitely from editing because it is believed to have been
compromised. Note that edits to your user talk page might not indicate that you have regained control of your account. If your rights to e-mail and edit your user talk page have been revoked, contact ArbCom at arbcom-llists.wikimedia.org.
Reaper Eternal (
talk)
16:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect In Soviet Russia Wikipedia browses YOU. Since you had some involvement with the In Soviet Russia Wikipedia browses YOU redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MichaelSchumacherMercedes ( talk) 06:02, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect O. B. L.. Since you had some involvement with the O. B. L. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Jawadreventon ( talk) 18:02, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Epic Movie 2. Since you had some involvement with the Epic Movie 2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 14:44, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
As one of the previous contributors to {{ Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Current President of the United States. Since you had some involvement with the Current President of the United States redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The ChampionMan 1234 09:46, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Adult comedy. Since you had some involvement with the Adult comedy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. McGeddon ( talk) 19:43, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect What the ****. Since you had some involvement with the What the **** redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 05:19, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gosh darn. Since you had some involvement with the Gosh darn redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 05:37, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
For the most part, they're not very informative, but they do help if some editor removes an image for a bad reason. Also, the image warning I just got was wrong -- there was nothing wrong with the poster image for 30 Days of Night, so I don't know why I got it. Thanks for the heads-up about that, though... maybe I'll consider usage down the road. — Erik ( talk • contrib) - 22:05, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Can someone please make this redirect for me, because I'm clueless about what the proper term is. TheBlazikenMaster ( talk) 09:15, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I want you just to know that I support the merge of the episodes. Maybe it's better if we create 3 articles, one for each season, instead of 1, so we keep as much information as possible but at the end we trim these huge plot descriptions. The vast majority contains only two lines of real-world information. If you go and do it, I'll support you. -- Magioladitis ( talk) 23:41, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
To be honest, and I know this will be sound really flippant, I just don't care. I already list my FAs on my userpage without being so egostistical to also include them in my userboxes or categorize myself as such. Alientraveller ( talk) 16:28, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
I agree that the article needs an image, but do you believe we can upload a better one other than a VHS/DVD cover? Best pic I could find was this. Please reply on your talk page, Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 18:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
The Minor Barnstar | ||
I award this Minor Barnstar to TheBlazikenMaster for your many constructive edits that go unnoticed. LAA Fan 19:46, 23 May 2008 (UTC) |
But I'm not done yet. I still have to put disclaimers to the talk pages. That will take a while. TheBlazikenMaster ( talk) 22:05, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey, do you think you could keep an eye on the articles for me? You do a great job already, but I'm heading off on a Wikibreak shortly, and I was wondering if you could keep an eye on them for me when I'm away? Cheers. Qst ( talk) 17:47, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Look, if you're going to complain about the "encyclopedic format" then at least rewrite your sections so they're understandable instead of just taking out the bullets please? Because when I first looked at it, it looks like thats exactly what happened, which is why I put them back in. The entire cultural reference section on the page I edited is darn near the most kludged section I've seen in a while. I won't edit any more FG pages because I apparently don't do it right, but if you're so worried about that section being formatted like an encyclopedia then modify it so it is, please. Don't just do sentence after sentence after sentence that doesn't make sense in a paragraph like that. My $0.02. → ClarkCT Talk @ 04:29, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry for the belated response. I think I know what I do about movies because I've done a bit of research for Wikipedia articles. I haven't just found online articles that talk about films; I've used subscription-only databases to find coverage from newspapers, magazines, and journals. I've actually been reading some film journal articles since I want to write a pretty hefty "Critical analysis" section for Fight Club. I guess in my research, I just see trends like how a film's release is not guaranteed until it actually begins production. I've kept up with future films and seen how they collapse for a wide variety of reasons. — Erik ( talk • contrib) - 01:16, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
How have you been, anyway? See any good films? Did you ever put up these YouTube reviews and the transcripts? — Erik ( talk • contrib) - 18:28, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
I think this is not yet serious enough for such a hidden note. Lets first wait to see how persistent this person is. If he/she is a troll, such a note might only work
feedy. Perhaps s/he will eventually just give up, or decides to talk to the rest. If the edits continue however, such a note might indeed be a good idea, as the person is using dynamic IPs, and it might be the only way to warn him/her directly.
At least one of the ranges the person used is 90.202.89.* (see the contributions of
90.202.89.2,
90.202.89.104 and
90.202.89.178). The address
90.211.190.146 was also used by this person, and might be dynamic as well. Cheers,
Face
15:17, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry to contradict you twice in one day! Please feel free to tell me I'm wrong and totally retawded. / edg ☺ ☭ 16:24, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
{{HelpMe}}
Why are
those discussions still open?
TheBlazikenMaster (
talk)
15:42, 25 June 2008 (UTC)}}
I tried that but it didn't work! Besides, I wasn't even asking you! -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 18:15, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
I am calm. I just don't even know you. Not that that's a bad thing. I just was surprised you answered my question! -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 18:19, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Oh no please! You're free to talk to us! I'm always up for making new friends! Let's just forget about what happened earlier because we started off on kind of the wrong foot. Here, I'll start. Hi, my name is Soccer5525 and I'm a fellow Wikipedian of yours! -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 19:36, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Thankyou, I just have a lot of practice undertaking prose reviews at GA. I don't want to disparage Qst, s/he has found and properly referenced the sources, collected the information and formatted the page all to a high standard. They just have a little problem with writing coherently and neatly. I'm not adding anything new to the article, just organising what is there into a more defined order and brushing up the prose.-- Jackyd101 ( talk) 00:56, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Soccer5525 has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. {{subst:if||| {{{message}}} ||subst=subst:}} To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
-- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 14:59, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
No prob. I just thought it would be a nice gesture. Hope we can keep in touch still. :) -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 00:56, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Lool very funny [1]. -- SkyWalker ( talk) 06:31, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your sympathy. But I guess you misunderstood what we're talking about. The person that died was a dog. Did you think it was a person? -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 19:26, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Even so, it's nice to hear that you care. I'll be sure to tell my friend that even complete strangers on Wikipedia still care about her dog. -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 19:29, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi, it's me again. I was just wondering.......have I done anything that could be awarded a Barnstar from you? I mean, am I a nice person. I just haven't been awarded a Barnstar yet, and would like one. I know, I sound pathetic, but you don't have to reply to this if you don't want to.... -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 19:40, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
I don't mind. If you don't give me one, I won't give you one. That's fair. :) -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 19:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
I agree! Personally, I'd rather have a cookie than a star. Cookies taste better. :) -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 19:57, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Please sign my new autograph book! -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 13:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
It's on the bottom of my userpage! You can't miss it! -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 13:34, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Haha, I can hear, just can't make out all the words. Besides, I'm in the living room with people conked out on the sofas and floor. Link me to it, I'll watch it without audio. — Erik ( talk • contrib) - 12:50, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Any comments for [2]?-- SkyWalker ( talk) 05:17, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
My apologies, I did not realize there had been a discussion about that at WT:FT. Sorry about that. Cirt ( talk) 21:20, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
omg, you SO have to hear this! I showed my BFFL Leah one of your youtube videos yesterday, and she totally thinks you're hott! she adores your hair too! -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 14:15, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
BFFL = Best Friend For Life. -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 14:17, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
She would tell you this herslf, but she doesn't have a Wikipedia or a Youtube account. -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 14:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
You know, I've been notcing something. Every friend I have or every person I talk to on Wikipeida is a boy. Why is that? And also, I've only told Erik about this but, one time on Wikipedia, a guy I don't even know called me a, (please excuse my language...) "sex kitten". I won't disclose his name, for that could cause issues. Do know any girls that I could befriend on Wikipedia? -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 14:50, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Well, you know what I mean! I doubt that you're even the least bit manly in real life either! For example, you're interested in Pokemon. Now I don't mean to be rude but, don't you think Pokemon is a little babyish for you? I mean, how old are you? --
Soccer
5525
(Tk •
Ctrb)
15:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Nevermind, it says that you're 19 on your Wikipedia page. I'm 16, so we're close to the same age. -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 15:27, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
How could you like that word? It's terrible! -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 15:49, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for understanding. So anyway, what do you think about be BFFFL thinking you're hott? (I don't think you're cute, no offense!) -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 16:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
How is it nice of that guy to call me that? -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 16:56, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Oh. I thought you emant the other thing. And she's a she by the way. -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 17:38, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
why did you want to see if we had things in common? -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 15:34, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Please leave a little message where you signed on my guestbook. As you can see, everyone else did. -- Soccer 5525 (Tk • Ctrb) 22:36, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Because "Nite" is the way it was originally spelled in Pokémon Gold, Silver, and Crystal. So we should preserve that spelling. Artichoker talk 15:32, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Chev Chelios, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. P4k ( talk) 00:28, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
I saw you editing. Are you back? Cheers, Face 21:20, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
That's no problem. How many pages do you have on your watchlist? I have 357, but a lot of them are red links that I keep just in case an editor creates an film article too early. — Erik ( talk • contrib) - 01:22, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Had something of a "brain fart" on that one but thanks for the tip. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oosh ( talk • contribs) 23:00, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Could I ask for your comment here, please? I asked ThinkBlue to leave the situation open to comment, and it would be nice to see it. Best, Qst ( talk) 13:13, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi Blaziken. Ehm... I don't know, but I tend to see a slight anger in your words at my talk page and here. Sorry if I, in any way, offended you. But don't you think my idea at least sounds nice? Let Bulbapedia have the lawyers! *chuckles* - Face 22:56, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
I wanna say to you one thing, in the article List of Family Guy voice actors i'm looking the actors in Spanish audio, the Family Guy in Spanish is dubbed in two versions Spanish (European) and Latino-American. But here only just writting in the Latino audio, could be better added the European dubbing. What do you say? -- Ravave ( talk) 20:29, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Who i speak then?. I say to you that could create a column apart, i direct to you because you are of the Family Guy WP and i want to suggest you this. I know how call them the Spanish actors names, if you want, i same add they names. -- Ravave ( talk) 20:43, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
"His name is face because he is the Face of what's relevant and what isn't on Wikipedia. (I hope you don't get offended by what I assumed, Face.)" [4]
So... what does this means? Cheers, Face 21:56, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
I asked you a question here, because I thought that you had this page in Watchlist. 2 days passed, you haven't answered, so I assume I was wrong and inform you about this question here. Hope you answer ;). If you answer my another 3 questions that I posted there, it will be great too ;) Quolav ( talk) 23:37, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
That's bad news! I think only Artichoker and me are currently watching the lists, but Artichoker has many other interests. Other patrollers help out now and then, but sometimes I feel I'm the only one in the watchtower; help is certainly appreciated. I understand your decision though. Patrolling gets boring quickly if you don't feel that what you do is sensible. But he, someone's gotta do it. Lately, I haven't been very active on WP, but soon I'll be doing the regular patrolling again. Thanks for your notification, and good luck with whatever you're going to do. See you around, Face 18:27, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Girolamo Savonarola ( talk) 06:41, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
I and have reopened the discussion here [ [5]]. Would you care to chime in? thanks. Smatprt ( talk) 01:02, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry about the merge proposing. It's just the only alternative I know to just losing the info outright. And I don't think you should quit the project if you feel that something at least *should* be done.-- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 01:49, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Girolamo Savonarola ( talk) 21:25, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
I was removing an edit made to insert a vandal edit summary. Thanks, NawlinWiki ( talk) 16:43, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Instead of northest, check out northernmost. That should do the trick. — CactusWriter | needles 15:25, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
I just wanted to make sure you were aware that we will still have an IMDb link in the "External links" section of film articles. It's just an additional click of "External links" in the table of contents to jump down and see IMDb and other links. — Erik ( talk • contrib) - 22:48, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks! ZenCopain ( talk) 00:17, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
for the most part I removed spaces from the article that were at the end of paragraphs with a semi-bot run tool. A State Of Trance ( talk) 14:43, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Blaziken Master. You can join our Wikipedia:Wikiproject SpongeBob SquarePants. - Porchcrop ( talk| contributions) 03:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Where is this discussion that you have already been through deleting that template? I'd like to take a look. Also, why would you even give your opinion if you are saying it can be discounted. CTJF83 Talk 15:29, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
{{help|No, I'm not leaving just yet, but I'm thinking about it. Could someone tell me the best place to say goodbye if I decide to leave?
TheBlazikenMaster (
talk)
01:20, 23 October 2008 (UTC)}}
Please stay, but you can say goodbye on your userpage.-- Res 2216 firestar 01:24, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Well I had a valid point if you look at WP:Notability that an article still has to illustrate why an article is notable and have a verifiable source. The first criteria is "significant coverage". Before PC edited the article earlier all it said was "...is a short film directed by George Lucas". If it had even said is a "30 minute film directed by George Lucas about Coppola's film this would have seemingly addressed the problem. A subject isn't inherently notable if it is devoid of any content whatsoever. The reason why I removed my comment is because I don't want to see another tiff with Giro over something trivial and somethign which was only used as an example of redundant content from an obviously "notable" director. Best Blofeld of SPECTRE ( talk) 12:42, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
I will be checking this back this weekend though, but that's it. TheBlazikenMaster ( talk) 12:15, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Yay, glad you're sticking around! I'm trying to understand the issues you've had on Wikipedia, though... can you give me some examples of what has bothered you? — Erik ( talk • contrib) 01:21, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
I think that it would be fun to watch, especially if you liked Casino Royale. I don't usually go to theaters unless the movies are worth watching on a big screen with other people, but I'll go for Quantum of Solace. Trailer looks great, but from what I've heard, it won't have quite as much of the 007 humor of previous films. It's okay by me, though, I like the gritty take. Not to mention the contemporary situation of a villain pretending to be "green" is just wicked cool. — Erik ( talk • contrib) 14:02, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
I need some serious help here, I don't wanna be the inventor of a ridiculous word. TheBlazikenMaster ( talk) 09:27, 29 October 2008 (UTC)}}
Man, that is a lot of pressure to make your Halloween great. Are you wanting a recommendation for a good Halloween film? I have to admit I am not a huge fan of horror in general, and I am not sure what you like. I think that The Descent is one of the best horror films I've seen; it has a very claustrophobic atmosphere. Beyond that, I'm not sure what else there is... I tend to prefer thriller films, which have less to do with jump-out-and-scare and more to do with tension. Two great examples that come to mind are The Silence of the Lambs and Seven, but be warned, they are very adult films. I hope my recommendations at least come in handy. By the way, the redirect seems fine to me. It's close enough, I think. — Erik ( talk • contrib) 11:57, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Perfectly understandable, Blaziken. All the best. -- Altiris Helios Exeunt 14:43, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Hey, hope you've been well! To be honest, I am not sure if either movie is worth seeing in theaters. I tend to rely on Rotten Tomatoes, which normalizes the rating. (Meaning that with a large enough sample, then additional reviews will not change the rating much.) Pride and Glory has 34%, and I am not sure if I will ever see it, even though I like Edward Norton. Body of Lies has 50%, a little weak, but it might be enjoyable to see in theaters with the big action scenes. I will probably see Body of Lies on DVD when it comes out, more because it's not captioned in theater near me. Cheers! — Erik ( talk • contrib) 20:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Check my user page to see why I'm planning on leaving. I made this section so all goodbyes will be kept at ONE place, and I will merge any new "goodbye" section to this place if more people wanna say goodbye. TheBlazikenMaster ( talk) 01:26, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
You wrote: "In case you don't remember me, we used to watch the Pokémon lists on Wikipedia. I will miss you. TheBlazikenMaster ( talk) 01:01, 29 November 2008 (UTC)"
So, does that mean you don't quit entirely? Are you semi-retired? Cheers, Face 12:15, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
It could be a fun movie if you like Adam Sandler; I enjoyed Click but passed on You Don't Mess With the Zohan. I probably will not pursue Bedtime Stories... there are some award contenders that I'd rather see, like The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. — Erik ( talk • contrib) 14:10, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Woman tits ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. – iridescent 22:44, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated !!!! ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you.
Control-alt-delete ★ user◾ talk◾ contrib◾ favs 22:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Bad Boys III. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad Boys III. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:04, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated The word fuck ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Glenfarclas ( talk) 01:53, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
If you're watching this page, I just wanna let you know that I'm back. But I'm not going to be involved in a lot of discussions, from now on I will mainly revert vandalism. I obviously had no idea what the hell I was doing most of the times. I have created many unnecessary redirects, been involved in many discussions without even knowing what I was talking about, I even nominated some things for deletion or something like that without even knowing what I was doing. To avoid doing stuff like that today, I will only be watching out for vandalism. I will try to stay away from discussions. TheBlazikenMaster ( talk) 16:34, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles ( talk) 18:01, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
But the reason I left in the first place was because I felt like I was causing nothing but trouble. How can I be on Wikipedia and not feel that way?
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their
user talk page. |
I for one don't care what you've done. Just don't do it again, and you'll always be welcome here. onyx 321 13:08, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
So I look forward to being back. TheBlazikenMaster ( talk) 08:19, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Abraham Lincoln, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Vrenator talk 12:17, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
I will be better and try to help the encyclopedia rather than hurting it. And I will treat everyone with respect. If I do something wrong feel free to point it out to me. TheBlazikenMaster ( talk) 12:51, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
So I was reading the article about reliable sources, and all I saw in that article is that reliable source is public knowledge. Now let me tell you something. All websites have their share of lies, and just because most people believe something to be true doesn't mean it is. In fact most people could believe in total bullshit. So my question is, how can I trust those so-called reliable sources in articles? The truth is I don't. For example, I don't believe for a second that John F. Kennedy was a fucking hero. Sure, he did great things for his country, but am I honestly supposed to believe he didn't do any harm? Yeah, I refuse to believe he was an all-good president and seriously think the media is overrating him. I know he was a nice guy, but nice does not mean good. I don't trust the articles on this site. That is why I am going to go to a bunch of talk pages and question them. So what I wanna know is, how can I trust a reliable source? That's something I have hard times figuring out. BlazeTheMovieFan ( talk) 21:08, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
We have a guideline that explains what Wikipedia means by reliable source, but clearly that's not what you're asking about, and your statement/question really isn't relevant to Wikipedia. If you're not interested in improving the encyclopedia, perhaps your return wasn't such a good idea after all. — DoRD ( talk) 21:33, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their
user talk page. |
Here for example I want someone to reply to the things I say. I'd love to use tags to bring awareness, but I'm worried that if I did that I'd look like an attention whore, and I don't want that. So what should I do when nobody replies to a message I post on a talk page? BlazeTheMovieFan ( talk) 20:14, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Come on over to Talk:Coca-Cola Schmidt,' MICHAEL Q. 04:10, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
You are too negative. Your initial edit summary was negative too!! Yes, some people try to delete notable content, others try to search for it and start it like myself!! Try to remember that for every deletionist there is somebody who works hard to build notable content/. We should have 10 articles on Icelandic newsreaders.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:49, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, a lot of articles and uneven coverage just sucks. But we can each make a difference to that.♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:09, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Shane Dawson. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Jeandré, 2012-01-07 t19:42z 19:42, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
You know, I'd much rather vandalize this site than helping it. Because I don't find it fun to make good edits, not to mention looking for reliable sources is boring. But I know I can only do that for less than 4 edits before I get banned, ah well. BlazeTheMovieFan ( talk) 17:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
I said that the reason why I'm not active on Wikipedia is because I don't trust the site. But to be honest, I now remember the reason why I love the site. Despite popular belief you can't put EVERYTHING on the site, and it has a strict policy on what qualifies as reliable source. So I will come back some day, for real. But not yet. BlazeTheMovieFan ( talk) 19:09, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect This century. Since you had some involvement with the This century redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 19:29, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Your account has been
blocked indefinitely from editing because it is believed to have been
compromised. Note that edits to your user talk page might not indicate that you have regained control of your account. If your rights to e-mail and edit your user talk page have been revoked, contact ArbCom at arbcom-llists.wikimedia.org.
Reaper Eternal (
talk)
16:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect In Soviet Russia Wikipedia browses YOU. Since you had some involvement with the In Soviet Russia Wikipedia browses YOU redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MichaelSchumacherMercedes ( talk) 06:02, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect O. B. L.. Since you had some involvement with the O. B. L. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Jawadreventon ( talk) 18:02, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Epic Movie 2. Since you had some involvement with the Epic Movie 2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 14:44, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
As one of the previous contributors to {{ Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Current President of the United States. Since you had some involvement with the Current President of the United States redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The ChampionMan 1234 09:46, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Adult comedy. Since you had some involvement with the Adult comedy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. McGeddon ( talk) 19:43, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect What the ****. Since you had some involvement with the What the **** redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 05:19, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gosh darn. Since you had some involvement with the Gosh darn redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 05:37, 4 September 2015 (UTC)